Atlas Insectes Provisoire De Belgique
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Redalyc.CLEPTOPARASITE BEES, with EMPHASIS on THE
Acta Biológica Colombiana ISSN: 0120-548X [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Colombia ALVES-DOS-SANTOS, ISABEL CLEPTOPARASITE BEES, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE OILBEES HOSTS Acta Biológica Colombiana, vol. 14, núm. 2, 2009, pp. 107-113 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319027883009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Acta biol. Colomb., Vol. 14 No. 2, 2009 107 - 114 CLEPTOPARASITE BEES, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE OILBEES HOSTS Abejas cleptoparásitas, con énfasis en las abejas hospederas coletoras de aceite ISABEL ALVES-DOS-SANTOS1, Ph. D. 1Departamento de Ecologia, IBUSP. Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 321, trav 14. São Paulo 05508-900 Brazil. [email protected] Presentado 1 de noviembre de 2008, aceptado 1 de febrero de 2009, correcciones 7 de julio de 2009. ABSTRACT Cleptoparasite bees lay their eggs inside nests constructed by other bee species and the larvae feed on pollen provided by the host, in this case, solitary bees. The cleptoparasite (adult and larvae) show many morphological and behavior adaptations to this life style. In this paper I present some data on the cleptoparasite bees whose hosts are bees specialized to collect floral oil. Key words: solitary bee, interspecific interaction, parasitic strategies, hospicidal larvae. RESUMEN Las abejas Cleptoparásitas depositan sus huevos en nidos construídos por otras especies de abejas y las larvas se alimentan del polen que proveen las hospederas, en este caso, abejas solitarias. -
Fauna Helvetica 9. Apidae 4
Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 163, 2008 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1317 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) BOOK REVIEW AMIET F., HERRMANN M., MÜLLER A. & NEUMEYER R.: FAUNA figures of some characters, taxonomic classification of species HELVETICA 9. APIDAE 4 (Anthidum, Chelostoma, and commentary on the individual species (description of Coelioxys, Dioxys, Heriades, Lithurgus, Megachile, Osmia & females and males, distribution of each species with a map of Stelis). Centre suisse de cartographie de la faune (CSCF), the records for Switzerland, flight period, cleptoparasites or host Neuchâtel, 2004, 272 pp., 249 figs, 117 distrib. maps. ISSN and additional notices). The records are graphically presented as 1422-6367. Hb: ISBN 2-88414-021-2. Price CHF 45.00. recent or old (before 1970). In the 5th volume, the recent records are further categorised as before of after 1990. At the end of AMIET F., HERRMANN M., MÜLLER A. & NEUMEYER R.: FAUNA each book there are references and a species index. HELVETICA 20. APIDAE 5 (Ammobates, Ammobatoides, The keys are well constructed. They are suitable for identifi- Anthophora, Biastes, Ceratina, Dasypoda, Epeoloides, Epeolus, cation by beginners. The identification keys are constructed as a Eucera, Macropis, Melecta, Melitta, Nomada, Pasites, Tetralo- sensu lato; for example, the Osmia key includes species of seve- nia, Thyreus, Xylocopa). Centre suisse de cartographie de la ral other supraspecific taxons (Hoplosmia, Hoplitis, Metalli- faune (CSCF), Neuchâtel, 2007, 356 pp., 423 figs, 142 distrib. nella, Neosmia, Protosmia, Erythrosmia and Tergosmia). I maps. ISSN 1422-6367. Hb: ISBN 978-2-88414-032-4. Price prefer identification keys that branch according to supraspecific CHF 50.00. -
Pollinators in Peril: a Systematic Status Review of North American
POLLINATORS in Peril A systematic status review of North American and Hawaiian native bees Kelsey Kopec & Lori Ann Burd • Center for Biological Diversity • February 2017 Executive Summary hile the decline of European honeybees in the United States and beyond has been well publicized in recent years, the more than 4,000 species of native bees in North W America and Hawaii have been much less documented. Although these native bees are not as well known as honeybees, they play a vital role in functioning ecosystems and also provide more than $3 billion dollars in fruit-pollination services each year just in the United States. For this first-of-its-kind analysis, the Center for Biological Diversity conducted a systematic review of the status of all 4,337 North American and Hawaiian native bees. Our key findings: • Among native bee species with sufficient data to assess (1,437), more than half (749) are declining. • Nearly 1 in 4 (347 native bee species) is imperiled and at increasing risk of extinction. • For many of the bee species lacking sufficient population data, it’s likely they are also declining or at risk of extinction. Additional research is urgently needed to protect them. • A primary driver of these declines is agricultural intensification, which includes habitat destruction and pesticide use. Other major threats are climate change and urbanization. These troubling findings come as a growing body of research has revealed that more than 40 percent of insect pollinators globally are highly threatened, including many of the native bees critical to unprompted crop and wildflower pollination across the United States. -
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Summary of Public Comments Explanatory Statement for Final Regulations
STATE OF CONNECTICUT 4/15/2015 Page 1 of 22 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS EXPLANATORY STATEMENT FOR FINAL REGULATIONS Proposed amendments to sections 26-306-4, 26-306-5, and 26-306-6 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. Proposed Amendments to Endangered, Threatened, and Species of Special Concern STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: As authorized pursuant to CGS section 26-306, the proposed amendments are to update the lists of species which are endangered, threatened or of special concern. Pursuant to CGS 26-307, the commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEEP) is required to review, at least every five years, the designation of species to determine whether species should be: (1) Added or removed from the list; or, if necessary, (2) change the designation. The Department held a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed amendment on March 31, 2015. The hearing record was open until April 14, 2015 at 4:30 pm for submission of written comments. Following is the wording of the proposed amendment as presented at the public hearing, a summary of comments received and the Department’s responses, and the recommended final wording for the amendment. Proposed Amendments at Time of Public Hearing of March 31, 2015 Section 1. Section 26-306-4 of the Regulations of State Agencies is amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-306-4. List of endangered species (a) The following mammal species are determined to be endangered: Cryptotis parva Least shrew Myotis leibii Eastern -
Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4. -
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife
Natural Heritage Macropis Cuckoo Bee & Endangered Species Epeoloides pilosula Program State Status: None www.mass.gov/nhesp Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: The Macropis Cuckoo Bee is a native bee, generally dark overall. As for many native bees, consultation of a technical manual is needed for accurate identification. For a complete description of male and female Macropis Cuckoo Bees, see: http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?search=Epeolo ides+pilosula HABITAT: Open sparsely vegetated areas. LIFE HISTORY: E. pilosula is a parasite in the nests of three species of Macropis bees in Massachusetts. It flies in June and July and has been recorded nectaring on species of Apocynum, Galax, Houstonia, and Rubus. Female Epeoloides pilosula. Photo courtesy of The Packer Lab – Bee Tribes of the World GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Michigan to New England and south to Georgia. STATUS AND THREATS: Currently, only one record is known from Massachusetts. Threats to the species are unknown. REFERENCES: Ascher, J.S., and J. Pickering. 2015. Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_spe cies Michener, C.D. 2000. The Bees of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. Male Epeoloides pilosula. Photo courtesy of The Packer Lab – Bee Tribes of the World Prepared 2015 A Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the Massachusetts State Wildlife Action Plan Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife 1 Rabbit Hill Rd., Westborough, MA; tel: 508-389-6300; fax: 508-389-7890; www.mass.gov/dfw Please allow the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program to continue to conserve the biodiversity of Massachusetts with a contribution for ‘endangered wildlife conservation’ on your state income tax form, as these donations comprise a significant portion of our operating budget. -
Bees of Ohio: a Field Guide
Bees of Ohio: A Field Guide North American Native Bee Collaborative The Bees of Ohio: A Field Guide (Version 1.1.1 , 5/2020) was developed based on Bees of Maryland: A Field Guide, authored by the North American Native Bee Collaborative Editing and layout for The Bees of Ohio : Amy Schnebelin, with input from MaLisa Spring and Denise Ellsworth. Cover photo by Amy Schnebelin Copyright Public Domain. 2017 by North American Native Bee Collaborative Public Domain. This book is designed to be modified, extracted from, or reproduced in its entirety by any group for any reason. Multiple copies of the same book with slight variations are completely expected and acceptable. Feel free to distribute or sell as you wish. We especially encourage people to create field guides for their region. There is no need to get in touch with the Collaborative, however, we would appreciate hearing of any corrections and suggestions that will help make the identification of bees more accessible and accurate to all people. We also suggest you add our names to the acknowledgments and add yourself and your collaborators. The only thing that will make us mad is if you block the free transfer of this information. The corresponding member of the Collaborative is Sam Droege ([email protected]). First Maryland Edition: 2017 First Ohio Edition: 2020 ISBN None North American Native Bee Collaborative Washington D.C. Where to Download or Order the Maryland version: PDF and original MS Word files can be downloaded from: http://bio2.elmira.edu/fieldbio/handybeemanual.html. -
The Biology and External Morphology of Bees
3?00( The Biology and External Morphology of Bees With a Synopsis of the Genera of Northwestern America Agricultural Experiment Station v" Oregon State University V Corvallis Northwestern America as interpreted for laxonomic synopses. AUTHORS: W. P. Stephen is a professor of entomology at Oregon State University, Corval- lis; and G. E. Bohart and P. F. Torchio are United States Department of Agriculture entomolo- gists stationed at Utah State University, Logan. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The research on which this bulletin is based was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants Nos. 3835 and 3657. Since this publication is largely a review and synthesis of published information, the authors are indebted primarily to a host of sci- entists who have recorded their observations of bees. In most cases, they are credited with specific observations and interpretations. However, information deemed to be common knowledge is pre- sented without reference as to source. For a number of items of unpublished information, the generosity of several co-workers is ac- knowledged. They include Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., Charles Osgood, Glenn Hackwell, Elbert Jay- cox, Siavosh Tirgari, and Gordon Hobbs. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Leland Chandler and Dr. Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., for reviewing the manuscript and for many helpful suggestions. Most of the drawings were prepared by Mrs. Thelwyn Koontz. The sources of many of the fig- ures are given at the end of the Literature Cited section on page 130. The cover drawing is by Virginia Taylor. The Biology and External Morphology of Bees ^ Published by the Agricultural Experiment Station and printed by the Department of Printing, Ore- gon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1969. -
Historical Changes in Northeastern US Bee Pollinators Related to Shared Ecological Traits Ignasi Bartomeusa,B,1, John S
Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits Ignasi Bartomeusa,b,1, John S. Ascherc,d, Jason Gibbse, Bryan N. Danforthe, David L. Wagnerf, Shannon M. Hedtkee, and Rachael Winfreea,g aDepartment of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901; bDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden; cDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024-5192; dDepartment of Biological Sciences, Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117546; eDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; fDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3043; and gDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved February 1, 2013 (received for review October 24, 2012) Pollinators such as bees are essential to the functioning of ter- characterized by particularly intensive land use and may not be restrial ecosystems. However, despite concerns about a global representative of changes in the status of bees in other parts of pollinator crisis, long-term data on the status of bee species are the world. Thus, the existence of a widespread crisis in pollinator limited. We present a long-term study of relative rates of change declines, as often portrayed in the media and elsewhere (4), rests for an entire regional bee fauna in the northeastern United States, on data of limited taxonomic or geographic scope. based on >30,000 museum records representing 438 species. Over Environmental change affects species differentially, creating a 140-y period, aggregate native species richness weakly de- “losers” that decline with increased human activity, but also creased, but richness declines were significant only for the genus “winners” that thrive in human-altered environments (14). -
Macropis Cuckoo Bee (Epeoloides Pilosulus) in Canada
PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Macropis Cuckoo Bee (Epeoloides pilosulus) in Canada Macropis Cuckoo Bee 2021 1 Recommended citation: 2 3 Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2021. Recovery Strategy for the Macropis 4 Cuckoo Bee (Epeoloides pilosulus) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act 5 Recovery Strategy Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. 6 vii + 12 pp. 7 8 9 10 Official version 11 The official version of the recovery documents is the one published in PDF. All 12 hyperlinks were valid as of date of publication. 13 14 Non-official version 15 The non-official version of the recovery documents is published in HTML format and all 16 hyperlinks were valid as of date of publication. 17 18 19 20 For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, 21 including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) 22 Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery 23 documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. 24 25 26 27 Cover illustration: 28 Macropis Cuckoo Bee (male). Photo by Sam Droege 29 30 31 32 Également disponible en français sous le titre 33 « Programme de rétablissement de l’abeille•coucou de Macropis (Epeoloides pilosulus) 34 au Canada [Proposition] » 35 36 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of 37 Environment and Climate Change, 2021. All rights reserved. 38 ISBN 39 Catalogue no. 40 41 42 Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate 43 credit to the source. -
Addition to the Checklist of IUCN European Wild Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) International Journal of Entomology ISSN: 0037-9271 (Print) 2168-6351 (Online) Journal homepage: http://tandfonline.com/loi/tase20 Addition to the checklist of IUCN European wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Pierre Rasmont, Jelle Devalez, Alain Pauly, Denis Michez & Vladimir G. Radchenko To cite this article: Pierre Rasmont, Jelle Devalez, Alain Pauly, Denis Michez & Vladimir G. Radchenko (2017) Addition to the checklist of IUCN European wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), 53:1, 17-32, DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2017.1307696 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2017.1307696 Published online: 27 Apr 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tase20 Download by: [Universite De Mons-Hainaut] Date: 27 April 2017, At: 09:54 Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), 2017 Vol.53,No.1,17–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2017.1307696 Addition to the checklist of IUCN European wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Pierre Rasmonta*, Jelle Devalezb, Alain Paulyc, Denis Micheza & Vladimir G. Radchenkod aLaboratory of Zoology, Institute of Biosciences, University of Mons, Place du Parc 23, B-70000 Mons, Belgium; bLaboratory of Biogeography & Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, University Hill, Geography Building, GR-81100 Mytilene, Greece; cOD Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; dDepartment of Ethology and Social Biology of Insects, Institute for Evolutionary Ecology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, acad. -
Citizen Scientist Pollinator Monitoring Guide
Pennsylvania Native Bee Survey Citizen Scientist Pollinator Monitoring Guide Revised for Pennsylvania By: Leo Donovall and Dennis vanEngelsdorp Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture The Pennsylvania State University Based on the “California Pollinator Project: Citizen Scientist Pollinator Monitoring Guide” Developed By: Katharina Ullmann, Tiffany Shih, Mace Vaughan, and Claire Kremen The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation University of California at Berkeley The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation is an international, nonprofit, member-supported organization dedicated to preserving wildlife and its habitat through the conservation of invertebrates. The Society promotes protection of invertebrates and their habitat through science-based advocacy, conservation, and education projects. Its work focuses on three principal areas – endangered species, watershed health, and pollinator conservation. For more information about the Society or on becoming a member, please visit our website (www.xerces.org) or call us at (503) 232-6639. Through its pollinator conservation program, the Society offers practical advice and technical support on habitat management for native pollinator insects. University of California Berkeley collaborates with the Xerces Society on monitoring pollinator communities and pollination function at farm sites before and after restoration. University of California Berkeley conducts studies to calibrate the observational data collected by citizen scientists against the specimen-based data collected by scientists