Gayeski and Tuohy – Brep Performance Progress Report – July 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gayeski and Tuohy – Brep Performance Progress Report – July 2018 EVALUATION OF POUND NETS AS STOCK SELECTIVE FISHING TOOLS IN THE LOWER COLUMBIA SUB-BASIN AWARD # NA17NMF4720255 BREP PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT Award Period – July 1st, 2017 - June 30th, 2018 Reporting Period – January 1st, 2018 – June 30th, 2018 Submitted To: Erin Wilkinson NOAA Fisheries 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Submitted By: Nick Gayeski, Ph.D. Adrian Tuohy, M.S. Wild Fish Conservancy P.O Box 402 Duvall, WA 98019 July 2018 GAYESKI AND TUOHY – BREP PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT – JULY 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without funding received under award NA17NMF4720255 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service, in cooperation with the Bycatch Reduction Engineering Program (BREP). We are grateful for additional support and funding provided by the Washington Coastal Restoration Initiative, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and the Patagonia World Trout Grant Initiative. We would like to thank the many people that collaborated and contributed to this study to make it a success: Blair Peterson for his knowledge of traps and skill as a commercial fisherman; Dr. John Skalski and Dr. Thomas Quinn of the University of Washington for technical guidance, support, and review; Ron Warren and Bill Tweit of WDFW for administrative support; the community of Cathlamet, WA for its generous hospitality; and volunteers Blake Joplin and Mary Valentine for their remarkable endurance and commitment to quality. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations from this performance progress report are those of Wild Fish Conservancy and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA Fisheries. 2 GAYESKI AND TUOHY – BREP PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT – JULY 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................2 II. ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................4 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................5 IV. PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................7 A. Description of the Problem...........................................................................................7 B. Objectives of the Project .............................................................................................12 V. APPROACH ............................................................................................................................13 A. Description of the Work Performed ..........................................................................13 B. Project Management ...................................................................................................25 VI. FINDINGS..............................................................................................................................27 A. Actual Accomplishments and Findings .....................................................................27 B. Significant Problems ...................................................................................................41 C. Need for Additional Work ..........................................................................................41 VII. EVALUATION ....................................................................................................................42 A. Attainment of Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................42 B. Dissemination of Project Results ...............................................................................50 C. Applications, Benefits, and Conclusions ...................................................................52 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................54 APPENDICES ..............................................................................................................................65 A. Bayesian Survival Analysis ........................................................................................65 B. Project Photographs ....................................................................................................72 C. Catch Totals .................................................................................................................84 3 GAYESKI AND TUOHY – BREP PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT – JULY 2018 II. ABSTRACT Gillnets and other conventional harvest techniques utilized in mixed-stock commercial salmon fisheries frequently result in bycatch mortality. In many parts of the U.S Pacific Northwest, bycatch and hatchery impacts impede the recovery of Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed salmonids and constrain commercial fishing opportunities. For the benefit of wild salmon, threatened ecosystems, and coastal fishing communities, a post-release survival study was conducted on the lower Columbia River to evaluate the potential of an alternative commercial gear—an experimental pound net trap—as a live-capture, stock-selective harvest technique. Expanding upon a 2016 pilot study, a modified trap was constructed and operated under a variety of tidal stages, light levels, and weather conditions between August 26 and September 27, 2017. Utilizing a paired mark-release-recapture procedure with Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags, post-release survival from the trap was estimated through the Cormack- Jolly-Seber method; catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and covariates of CPUE were analyzed through Generalized Linear Models (GLM). Results demonstrated that pound net traps can effectively target commercially viable quantities of hatchery reared fall Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and coho salmon (O. kisutch) while reducing cumulative bycatch mortality of ESA- listed species relative to conventional and alternative commercial gears. During the study period, 7,129 salmonids were captured and released. The ratio of wild to hatchery-origin salmonids captured was approximately 1:3. Cumulative survival to McNary Dam ranged from 94.4% for steelhead trout (O. mykiss) to 99.5% for Chinook salmon, warranting application of the gear as a stock-selective harvest tool in commercial salmon fisheries. 4 GAYESKI AND TUOHY – BREP PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT – JULY 2018 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With continuation of salmonid hatchery programs in the Columbia River Basin and elsewhere in the U.S Pacific Northwest, development and implementation of stock-selective commercial harvest tools for improved targeting of hatchery-origin fishes and reduction of bycatch impacts has been recognized as a necessary means to enable and expand commercial fishing opportunities while minimizing take of threatened and endangered salmonids under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). To benefit wild salmonid recovery and fisheries of the lower Columbia River, Wild Fish Conservancy (WFC) received funding from NOAA Fisheries Service BREP to expand upon a 2016 pilot study evaluating the potential of an alternative commercial gear—an experimental pound net trap—as a stock-selective, sustainable harvest technique. The project had three major goals: 1) test and refine deployment and operation of a modified pound net trap in the lower Columbia River; 2) determine the effectiveness of the harvest method in capturing salmon relative to previously tested alternative gears in the region; and 3) evaluate the ability of the gear to protect non-target species through identification of capture and release conditions, immediate survival, and post-release survival of fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead trout (O. mykiss). The experimental pound net trap was successfully constructed by WFC and a local commercial fisherman in August 2017. Modifications were made based upon previous experiences in the 2016 pilot season and the designs of other alternative fishing gears tested throughout the Pacific Northwest. Test fishing and research activities proceeded from August 26 through September 27, 2017. Mirroring prior alternative gear evaluations in the lower Columbia River, WFC utilized a paired mark-release-recapture methodology with Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags to estimate post-release survival from the experimental trap. Upstream detections of tagged and released fall Chinook salmon and steelhead trout were compared to that of a control source of fish through the Cormack-Jolly-Seber method; total catch, CPUE, capture/release conditions, immediate survival, and CPUE covariates were measured and analyzed. By September 27, 2017, a total of 2,851 treatment and control Chinook salmon and steelhead trout were PIT tagged and released at the experimental trap site. All tagged fish were queried for detections at PIT tag arrays at various dams and hatcheries located upstream. Unique tag detection histories were recovered through the PIT Tag Recovery Information System (PTAGIS). Results demonstrated that pound net traps can effectively target commercially viable quantities of hatchery reared fall Chinook and coho salmon (O. kisutch) while reducing cumulative bycatch mortality of ESA-listed species relative to conventional and alternative commercial gears. During the study period, 7,129 salmonids were captured and released. The ratio of wild to hatchery-origin salmonids captured was approximately
Recommended publications
  • Stone Tidal Weirs, Underwater Cultural Heritage Or Not? Akifumi
    Stone Tidal Weirs, Underwater Cultural Heritage or Not? Akifumi Iwabuchi Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 135-8533 Email: [email protected] Abstract The stone tidal weir is a kind of fish trap, made of numerous rocks or reef limestones, which extends along the shoreline on a colossal scale in semicircular, half-quadrilateral, or almost linear shape. At the flood tide these weirs are submerged beneath the sea, while they emerge into full view at the ebb. Using with nets or tridents, fishermen, inside the weirs at low tides, catch fish that fails to escape because of the stone walls. They could be observed in the Pacific or the Yap Islands, in the Indian Ocean or the east African coast, and in the Atlantic or Oleron and Ré Islands. The UNESCO’s 2001 Convention regards this weir as underwater cultural heritage, because it has been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, for at least 100 years; stone tidal weirs have been built in France since the 11th century and a historical record notes that one weir in the Ryukyu Islands was built in the 17th century. In Japan every weir is considered not to be buried cultural property or cultural heritage investigated by archaeologists, but to be folk cultural asset studied by anthropologists, according to its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties. Even now in many countries stone tidal weirs are continuously built or restored by locals. Owing to the contemporary trait, it is not easy to preserve them under the name of underwater cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Trap Nets?
    WHAT ARE TRAP NETS? HOW TO AVOID TRAP NETS Trap nets are large commercial fishing nets used by n Look for red, orange or black flag markers, buoys licensed commercial fisherman to catch fish in the HOW TO IDENTIFY TRAP NETS and floats marking the nets. Great Lakes. With many components, these stationary Some anglers mark the n Trap nets are generally fished perpendicular to the n Give wide berth when passing trap net buoys nets can pose a potential risk to recreational boaters lead end, anchor end or and flag markers, as nets have many anchor lines and anglers. The following facts will help anglers and shoreline (from shallow to deep water). A flag buoy or both ends with a double float marks the lead end of a trap net (closest to shore) flag. Pennsylvania uses the extending in all directions. boaters recognize and avoid trap nets on the open double flag. water. and the main anchor end (lakeward). n Do not pass or troll between trap net buoys, as n Red, orange or black flags attached to a staff buoy at the propeller blades and/or fishing gear may easily pot must be at least 4 feet above the surface of the water. Flags will be approximately 12 inches snag net lines. HOW DO square and bear the license number of the commercial fishing operation. Be aware! During rough water or heavy currents, these flags can lay down or be obscured by high waves. TRAP NETS IF TANGLED IN A TRAP NET n Floats may also mark the ends of the wings and/or each anchor.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Diverse Fishing Techniques In
    International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com Volume No 04, Special Issue No. 01, May 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537 USE OF DIVERSE FISHING TECHNIQUES IN MID- HIMALAYAN LANDSCAPE OF CENTRAL HIMALAYA, UTTARAKHAND Rakesh Verma Department of Zoology, Government Post Graduate College Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand, (India) ABSTRACT Fishes are protein providing main exploitable resources of the aquatic ecosystems. Fishing nets and gears are refers to those devices having different shape and sizes and used in the water body to capture different sizes of fishs. Present study deals with fishing techniques in Uttarakhand where fishing has its good scope. Fishing methods was observed and collected through intensive field survey, structured questionnaire, direct observation, interview methods and direct conversation to the fishermen. Various fishing nets, fish poison and use of explosives were main part of this state fishing methods. Fishing techniques adopted in Uttarakhand were simple, mostly old-fashioned, indigenous and locally manufactured. Paper also focuses on various techniques as well as their independent contribution in state fishing. Gill net, Cast net, Dragged net, Dip net, Hand net, Hanging rope, Trap, Hook, Line and Explosives were mainly used other than that six chemical poisons and thirteen Icthyo-toxic plants were observe which was used by the local fishermen. Explosives and Icthyo-poisons were polluting and damaging aquatic ecosystem by various ways and was one of the main causes of aquatic biodiversity loss. Keywords: Central Himalaya, Fishing Techniques, Fishing Gears, Fishing Nets, Fish Poison, Hill Stream Fishing I. INTRODUCTION The fishes are one of the main exploitable resources of the aquatic ecosystems that provide a major source of protein.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Fishing Regulations
    HAWAI‘I FISHING REGULATIONS August 2015 CONTENTS Regulated marine species . 4 How to measure and determine sex . .14 Scientific names of regulated species . 16 Regulated freshwater species . .18 Regulated fishing areas O‘ahu . .20 Hawai‘i . 28 Kaua‘i. .39 Maui . 46 Lāna‘i . .49 Moloka‘i . .51 Other management areas . .52 Northwestern Hawaiian Islands . .53 Gear restrictions . 54 Special provisions, licenses, permits . .57 Commercial fishing . .58 Bottom fishing . .59 Sharks and manta rays . 62 David Y. Ige, Governor Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) . 62 Division of Aquatic Resources (DAR) offices . .63 To report violations . .63 What’s new in this revision O‘ahu: New rules pertain to aquarium fishing (p. 55). BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES Maui: New minimum size and bag limit rules pertain to all parrotfish and goat- fish species (pp. 4-7). Hā‘ena, Kaua‘i: New Community Based Subsistence Fishing area established Suzanne D. Case, Chairperson (p. 44). This information is presented to acquaint sport and commercial fishermen with Members State laws and rules pertaining to fishing in Hawai‘i. It is not to be used as a legal document. Failure to include complete statutes or administrative rules in this summary does not relieve persons from abiding by those statutes and Keith "Keone" Downing James A. Gomes rules. Any discrepancies between this summary and the statutes or rules from which it was prepared will be enforced and adjudicated according to the official statutes and rules in effect on the date the activity took place. The full text of Thomas Oi Stanley H. Roehrig the statutes and rules is available for review at most public libraries in the State and at Division of Aquatic Resources (DAR) and Division of Conservation and Ulalia Woodside Christopher Yuen Resources Enforcement (DOCARE) offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Fishing on a Polynesian Atoll by Michael D
    12 SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin #4 September 1994 Only once did we have some bad weather, and that After the project was competed and the report fell on a weekend. Familiarity with the fishing prepared, copies were sent back to the council of methods, how they are usually conducted, and chiefs and to Woleai Atoll. On subsequent visits to what minor alterations were needed to satisfy the the atoll Smith has continued to answer questions scientific objectives was also essential to the project’s concerning fisheries management posed by the success. This was achieved because of the familiar- chiefs and fishermen. ity with the island’s culture and fishing methods acquired by Smith during the traditional fisheries Reference project. The fact that Smith is married to a woman from Woleai probably also contributed to some Smith, A. & P. Dalzell. 1993. Fisheries resources and degree to the co-operation we received. management investigations in Woleai Atoll, Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia. Inshore Payment of the fishermen, hiring of the necessary Fisheries Research Project Technical Document boats, and provision of outboard motor fuel for the No.4. South Pacific Commission, Noumea, New time spent fishing ensured the men’s continued Caledonia. interest. Payments were made after the completion of work at each of the four fishing sites. Prior to the field work, considerable time and effort was put into ensuring that the fishermen would be paid in cash, rather than the usual government cheques which can take months to be issued. Traditional fishing on a Polynesian atoll by Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Management (General) Regulations 2007 Under the Fisheries Management Act 2007
    Version: 1.7.2016 South Australia Fisheries Management (General) Regulations 2007 under the Fisheries Management Act 2007 Contents 1 Short title 3 Interpretation 4 Commercial quantity 5 Corresponding laws 6 Protected species 7 Classes of fishing activities prescribed for purposes of section 70 of Act 8 Sale, purchase or possession of aquatic resources 8A Possession of prescribed quantity of aquatic resource in prescribed circumstances 9 Aquatic or benthic animals 10 Registration of devices for non-commercial fishing 11 Duty to produce certificate of registration 12 Section 53(2) of Act not to apply to rods and lines and hand lines used for commercial fishing 13 Requirements relating to buoys and tags 14 Carriage of explosive devices in specified areas 15 Carriage of certain devices while using scuba etc 16 Carriage of devices near lock and weirs of Murray River 17 Distinguishing marks on boats 18 Mutilation of certain fish 19 Provisions relating to abalone fishing 20 Keeping of fish in corfs 21 Keeping of rock lobster 21A Taking rock lobster or setting rock lobster pots in Northern Zone during closed season 22 Duty to clip tail fan of rock lobster 23 Berleying 24 Commercial bait nets not to be left unattended 25 Requirement to remove anchors etc from nets removed from Lakes and Coorong Fishery 26 Marking of receptacles in which aquatic resources are transported, consigned for sale etc 27 Notice of seizure of device 28 Duty to notify Minister of change of address 29 Evidentiary provision 30 Expiation of alleged offences Schedule 1—Permitted
    [Show full text]
  • The Cryptic and Transboundary Nature of Ghost Gear in the Maldivian Archipelago
    The cryptic and transboundary nature of ghost gear in the Maldivian Archipelago Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Stelfox, Martin Citation Stelfox, M. (2019). 'The cryptic and transboundary nature of ghost gear in the Maldivian archipelago'. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Derby: University of Derby. Publisher University of Derby Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Download date 06/10/2021 14:39:16 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10545/625352 UNIVERSITY OF DERBY The cryptic and transboundary nature of ghost gear in the Maldivian Archipelago Martin Richard Stelfox Doctor of Philosophy 2020 1 Sensitivity: Internal THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 Sensitivity: Internal Contents Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 6 Figures........................................................................................................................................ 7 Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 10 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 12 Preface.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Patch Reef Fishes in a Subtropical Pacific Atoll
    THE ECOLOGY OF PATCH REEF FISHES IN A SUBTROPICAL PACIFIC ATOLL: RECRUITl~lT VARIABILITY, COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND EFFECTS OF FISHING PREDATORS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILUtENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY MAY 1989 By Robert E. Schroeder Dissertation Committee: J maes D. Parr ish, Chairraan Leonard A, Freed Ernst $. Reese Stephen V. Ralston Leighton R. Taylor Kent: W. Bridges We certify that ve have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology. Dissertation Committee: onar ree Ernst S. Reese ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I sincerely thank the members of my committee for their helpful comments, which greatly improved the quality of this dissertation. Dr. Parrish deserves special recognition for conceiving the idea for the predation experiment, serving as the principal investigator on the Sea Grant projects which largely supported this work, and for going out of his way repeatedly, to support me personally and the proper completion of this research effort. The field work required for this dissertation was labor intensive and physically demanding. I thank all the people who painstakingly contributed their assistance many in a major way! to the long days in the water, often under severe conditions, and late evenings of data transcription and field preparation. Jim Norris deserves special thanks in this regard, having done an excellent job in serving as my main dive buddy during most of the Midway cruises. I am indeed grateful to the many students who contributed to the necessary laboratory work and assisted with data and manuscript preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fishing Guide
    2021 Michigan Fishing Guide Rules apply from April 1, 2021 - March 31, 2022 Get the digital guide at Michigan.gov/DNRDigests MICHIGAN FISHING LICENSE INFORMATION & REQUIREMENTS License Items & Fees Purchase your fshing license (and more) online at Michigan.gov/DNRLicenses. Item Type Fee DNR Sportcard $1 All -Species Fishing Licenses Resident Annual $26* Nonresident Annual $76* Senior Annual (Residents 65 or older or Residents who are legally blind – see p. 6) $11* Daily Fish (Resident or Nonresident) $10/day Angler can buy from 1 to 6 consecutive days Voluntary Youth (16 and under) $2* Combo Hunt/Fish Licenses (Base, Annual Fishing, 2 Deer) Hunt/Fish Resident $76* Hunt/Fish Senior Resident $43* Hunt/Fish Nonresident $266* Lost Licenses Lost your license? See the gray box below for instructions on getting a replacement. Fishing license fees are waived for Michigan residents who are veterans with 100% disability or active-duty military (see p. 6). All fshing licenses are good for all species allowed for harvest as indicated in this Fishing Guide. A $1 surcharge is included in the combo hunt and fsh licenses, resident annual, nonresident annual, and senior annual fshing licenses, as noted with the asterisk (*). Revenue generated from these funds will be used to educate the public on the benefts of hunting, fshing and trapping in Michigan, and the impact of these activities on the conservation, preservation and management of the state’s natural resources in accordance with statute. Learn more at Michigan.gov/DNR. Who needs a Michigan fshing license? Any adult actively assisting a minor must have A license is required when targeting fsh, a fshing license.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING- See Page 27 GUIDE
    2019 Stop Aquatic Invasive Species: Clean, Drain and Dry Your Boat FISHING- See Page 27 GUIDE • Regulations • State Records • Master Angler Awards • Public Fishing Areas INFORMATION FOR: INFORMATION OutdoorNebraska.org OutdoorNebraska.org | 1 Paid Advertisement TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS GUIDE New for 2019 �������������������������������������������������������6 The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission's Fishing Fishing Permit Information . 7 Guide is a summary of Nebraska’s regulations, orders Fishing Permit Prices . 9 and statutes pertaining to fishing. It is not intended Hook-and-Line Regulations ��������������������������������10 to be a complete digest of regulations, orders and Catch-and-Release Only ����������������������������������� 11 statutes. A complete listing may be found at: Special Daily Bag Limits . 11 Regulations and Orders: Length Limits ����������������������������������������������������� 12 http://outdoornebraska.org/regulations/ Statewide Bag and Possession Limits ��������������13 Statutes: Bait Regulations. 15 http://law.justia.com/codes/nebraska/2017/ Archery and Spearfishing. .20 chapter-37/ Paddlefish Regulations ��������������������������������������22 Paid advertisements included in this publication do Fishing Tournaments . .26 not represent an endorsement by the Commission Aquatic Invasive Species �����������������������������������27 for the products, services or claims made by the State Records and Master Anglers . .29 advertisers. The Commission reserves the right to reject any advertising for any reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Gear Design and Production
    http://www.unaab.edu.ng COURSE CODE: FIS304 COURSE TITLE: Fishing Gear Design and Production NUMBER OF UNITS: 3 Units COURSE DURATION: Three hours per week COURSECOURSE DETAILS:DETAILS: Course Coordinator: Dr. D.O. Odulate Email: [email protected] Office Location: Room D203, COLERM Other Lecturers: Dr. W.O. Abdul COURSE CONTENT: Study of types of fishing gears and fishing crafts. Classification of fishing gears and crafts gear selectivity. Properties of the materials used in the construction of fish gears. The design and construction of different types of gears and graft. Assessment of fishing gear efficiency. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: This is a compulsory course for all students in Department of Aquaculture & Fisheries Management. In view of this, students are expected to participate in all the course activities and have minimum of 75% attendance to be eligible to write the final examination. READING LIST: FAO CDR: Fishing gear selectivity and performance. Being a paper presented at the expert consultation on the regulation of fishing efforts Sparre, P. and S.C. Venema (1992).Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1 &2 manual. FAO Fisheries Tecch. Paper No 306 .1, Rev.1. Rome, 376p E LECTURE NOTES FISH GEAR DESIGN AND PRODUCTION FISHING METHODS IN NIGERIA . Fishing is an act of harvesting fish. Equipment or devices used for fishing are called fishing gears. The various types of fishing gears and the ways they are used on Nigerian waters are http://www.unaab.edu.ng dependent on the following factors: o Financial status of fisherman o Seasons of the year o Species of fish targeted o Tribes of the fisherman o Shoreline pattern o Depth of the water METHODS o Traditional o Modern In almost every fishing community in Nigeria, nets from nylon are prevalently used.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNE, 1938 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER? Vol
    # s^a**/ OFFICIAL STATE JUNE, 1938 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER? Vol. 7—No. 6 »9»S apt" PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS Ten cents a copy — 50 cents a year CHARLES A. FRENCH Commissioner of Fisheries 1*1 MEMBERS OF BOARD CHARLES A. FRENCH, Chairman ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor Ellwood City South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MILTON L. PEEK Radnor HARRY E. WEBER Philipsburg SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT NOTE Dalton Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER EDGAR W. NICHOLSON should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either Philadelphia by check or money order payable to the Common­ wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. FRED McKEAN Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. New Kensington H. R. STACKHOUSE Secretary to Board PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ tions and photos of catches from its readers. Proper credit will be given to contributors. All contributions returned if accompanied by first C. R. BULLER class postage. Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte «»= S^ IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given ANNUAL BASS NUMBER Cover Painting by FRED EVERETT Vol. 7 No. 6 ^ANGLER/ JUNE, 1938 EDITORIAL LOSE A HOOK AND SPARE A BASS F there is finer sport than bass fishing, thousands of Pennsylvania fishermen would like to know about it. Opening of the bass season on July I this year is certain to attract one of the greatest numbers of anglers in the history of the Fish Commis­ sion to warm water lakes and streams yielding this hard-fighting game fish.
    [Show full text]