The Ecology of Raoiella Indica (Hirst: Tenuipalpidae) In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ecology of Raoiella Indica (Hirst: Tenuipalpidae) In The ecology of Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) in India and Trinidad The ecology of Raoiella indica (Hirst: Tenuipalpidae) in India and Trinidad: Host plant relations and predator: prey relationships Arabella Bryony K. Taylor (CID: 00459677) PhD Thesis June 2017 Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences CABI Egham, UK 1 The ecology of Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) in India and Trinidad Copyright declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. I certify that the contents of this thesis are my own work and the works by other authors are appropriately referenced. Some of the work described in chapter 4 of this thesis has been previously published in Taylor et al. (2011). 2 The ecology of Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) in India and Trinidad Abstract Red Palm Mite, Raoiella indica (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) (RPM), an Old World species first recorded in India (1924), was reported historically on a small number of host species of Arecaceae (palms) throughout Asia and the Middle East. In 2004, the mite invaded the New World resulting in high population densities and apparent new host associations- including Musa spp. (bananas and plantains). Subsequently, RPM has become widely established in the tropical Americas. The aim of the work was to understand some of the factors underlying the differences in RPM population status between the two regions by comparing morphological and molecular characteristics, investigating Old World host relations and comparing predator–prey interactions in India and Trinidad. Field population densities on main host Cocos nucifera were significantly higher in Trinidad compared to India. Substantial RPM field densities and breeding colonies were confirmed on Musa spp. in Trinidad, but not India; although RPM was shown to survive and lay eggs on Musa spp. in vitro in India. Arthropod predator diversity in India was higher on C. nucifera and lower on Musa spp. compared to Trinidad. Surveys on both host species only recorded predatory mites in Trinidad, whereas predatory insects and mites were recorded in India. Although molecular studies were unsuccessful, morphological studies showed that, independent of host plant, RPM had significantly longer lateral setae in the Caribbean compared to India. Adventive range populations may have resulted from a genetic bottleneck upon introduction. Assays in Trinidad showed that RPM with droplets on dorsal setae were contacted and consumed by Amblyseius largoensis on fewer occasions than those without. Setae may also play a role in defence against A. largoensis. Studies confirmed differences in RPM severity and status on host plants between regions and suggest natural enemies play a role in maintaining a narrow host range in India. 3 The ecology of Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) in India and Trinidad Contents Copyright declaration................................................................................................................. 2 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 Raoiella indica: A literature review ................................................................................... 12 2.1 Mites, the Tenuipalpidae and the genus Raoiella .......................................................... 12 2.2 Raoiella indica: life cycle .............................................................................................. 13 2.3 Host plants of Raoiella indica........................................................................................ 17 2.4 Biogeography ................................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Predator relations ........................................................................................................... 22 2.6 Raoiella indica- Population dynamics ........................................................................... 27 2.7 Invasion ecology theories .............................................................................................. 28 2.8 Host association, host races and biotypes. ..................................................................... 31 2.9 Questions relating to observations of invasive populations of RPM ............................. 33 2.9.1 Has RPM expanded its host range in the New World and if so, what are the factors behind this expansion? ..................................................................................................... 33 2.9.2 How accurate are the reports relating to the increase in RPM population density between Old and New World regions? If accurate, what factors may be driving the differences? ...................................................................................................................... 34 3.0 The morphological and molecular characterisation and comparison of RPM from India and the Caribbean .................................................................................................................... 36 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 36 3.2 General approaches ........................................................................................................ 38 3.2.1 Morphological comparison ..................................................................................... 38 3.2.2 Molecular techniques .............................................................................................. 40 3.3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................... 42 3.3.1 Selection of populations .......................................................................................... 42 3.3.2 Collection of mites .................................................................................................. 42 3.3.3 Morphological measurements ................................................................................. 43 3.3.4 Statistical analysis of morphological measurements .............................................. 43 3.3.5 Molecular analysis .................................................................................................. 46 4 The ecology of Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) in India and Trinidad 3.3.6 DNA extraction ....................................................................................................... 46 3.3.7 PCR methodology ................................................................................................... 47 3.3.8 Gel electrophoresis.................................................................................................. 47 3.3.9 Sequencing .............................................................................................................. 47 3.3.10 Improved PCR methodology ................................................................................ 48 3.4 Results ............................................................................................................................ 49 3.5 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 72 4.0 Host plant relations in the Old World ................................................................................ 77 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 77 4.2 Methods.......................................................................................................................... 81 4.2.1 Hypothesis 1............................................................................................................ 81 4.2.2 Hypothesis 2............................................................................................................ 89 4.2.3 Analyses .................................................................................................................. 90 4.3 Results ............................................................................................................................ 92 4.3.1 Hypothesis 1............................................................................................................ 92 4.3.2 Hypothesis 2.......................................................................................................... 108 Survival and reproduction of RPM on natal host compared to alternative host ............ 108 4.4 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 115 5.0 A comparison of RPM and related predator complex between the adventive range (Trinidad) and
Recommended publications
  • Biological Control of Thrips and Whiteflies by a Shared Predator: Two Pests Are Better Than One
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Biological control of thrips and whiteflies by a shared predator: Two pests are better than one Messelink, G.J.; van Maanen, R.; van Steenpaal, S.E.F.; Janssen, A. Published in: Biological Control DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.10.017 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Messelink, G. J., van Maanen, R., van Steenpaal, S. E. F., & Janssen, A. (2008). Biological control of thrips and whiteflies by a shared predator: Two pests are better than one. Biological Control, 44(3), 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.10.017 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) Download date: 27 Aug 2019 Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Biological Control 44 (2008) 372–379 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Biological control of thrips and whiteflies by a shared predator: Two pests are better than one Gerben J.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • The Predatory Mite (Acari, Parasitiformes: Mesostigmata (Gamasina); Acariformes: Prostigmata) Community in Strawberry Agrocenosis
    Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology, 2004, Vol. 676, pp. 87–95 The predatory mite (Acari, Parasitiformes: Mesostigmata (Gamasina); Acariformes: Prostigmata) community in strawberry agrocenosis Valentîna Petrova*, Ineta Salmane, Zigrîda Çudare Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Miera 3, Salaspils LV-2169, Latvia *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Altogether 37 predatory mite species from 14 families (Parasitiformes and Acariformes) were collected using leaf sampling and pit-fall trapping in strawberry fi elds (1997 - 2001). Thirty- six were recorded on strawberries for the fi rst time in Latvia. Two species, Paragarmania mali (Oud.) (Aceosejidae) and Eugamasus crassitarsis (Hal.) (Parasitidae) were new for the fauna of Latvia. The most abundant predatory mite families (species) collected from strawberry leaves were Phytoseiidae (Amblyseius cucumeris Oud., A. aurescens A.-H., A. bicaudus Wainst., A. herbarius Wainst.) and Anystidae (Anystis baccarum L.); from pit-fall traps – Parasitidae (Poecilochirus necrophori Vitz. and Parasitus lunaris Berl.), Aceosejidae (Leioseius semiscissus Berl.) and Macrochelidae (Macrocheles glaber Müll). Key words: agrocenosis, diversity, predatory mites, strawberry. Introduction Predatory mites play an important ecological role in terrestrial ecosystems and they are increasingly being used in management for biocontrol of pest mites, thrips and nematodes (Easterbrook 1992; Wright, Chambers 1994; Croft et al. 1998; Cuthbertson et al. 2003). Many of these mites have a major infl uence on nutrient cycling, as they are predators on other arthropods (Santos 1985; Karg 1993; Koehler 1999). In total, investigations of mite fauna in Latvia were made by Grube (1859), who found 28 species, Eglītis (1954) – 50 species, Kuznetsov and Petrov (1984) – 85 species, Lapiņa (1988) – 207 species, and Salmane (2001) – 247 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaper's Guide Working with Palms In
    Landscaper’s Guide Landscapers & Working with Nurseries Palms in the Purchasing restricted Palms outside of the quarantine Coachella Valley area and transporting into the protected area is prohibited by law. If you are caught, expect the following actions against you— ♦ Civil Administrative ♦ Criminal ♦ Civil Action Penalties will be imposed on violators. Riverside County PROOF OF PURCHASE MANDATORY Agricultural Commissioner Headquarters & District Office Plant materials found in 4080 Lemon Street, Room 19, Basement P.O. Box 1089, Riverside, CA 95202-1089 violation of the Quarantine Office: (951) 955-3045 law shall be removed at the Facsimile: (951) 955-3012 owner’s expense. Civil fines Indio District Office and Jail time may apply to Office: (760) 863-8291 each violation. Facsimile: (760) 863-7702 California Date Commission P.O. Box 1736 Indio, Ca 92202 Office: (760) 347-4510 Facsimile: (760) 347-6374 Email: [email protected] Website: www.DatesAreGreat.com 04/08 Susceptible Palms Infectious to palm frond; discoloration of leaves on one side of a palm frond and branches. Date Palm Disease the Date Palm, Phoenix dactylifera The disease can be carried on: InteriorInterior QuarantineQuarantine Not Allowable for Transporting and ⇒ Seeds Planting into a Protected Area ⇒ Plants Adopted by the California Department ⇒ Saws Canary Island Date Palm, Phoenix canariensis of Food and Agriculture in 1980, this ⇒ Knives and other tools used quarantine was established to protect “This palm is a known carrier of fusarium wilt for trimming or pruning date fungus infectious to the Senegal Date Palm, P. the California Date industry from palms reclinata and Date Palm P. dactylifera” Fusarium oxysporum, a soil-borne These precautionary measures should be taken Clump Palm (Senegal Date Palm), Phoenix reclinata fungus spread with the Canary Island to prevent the disease from spreading when working on palm trees in the Coachella Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 52: 1-415 Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Editors Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez and Mark T. Strong Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2005 ABSTRACT Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro and Mark T. Strong. Monocots and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, volume 52: 415 pages (including 65 figures). The present treatment constitutes an updated revision for the monocotyledon and gymnosperm flora (excluding Orchidaceae and Poaceae) for the biogeographical region of Puerto Rico (including all islets and islands) and the Virgin Islands. With this contribution, we fill the last major gap in the flora of this region, since the dicotyledons have been previously revised. This volume recognizes 33 families, 118 genera, and 349 species of Monocots (excluding the Orchidaceae and Poaceae) and three families, three genera, and six species of gymnosperms. The Poaceae with an estimated 89 genera and 265 species, will be published in a separate volume at a later date. When Ackerman’s (1995) treatment of orchids (65 genera and 145 species) and the Poaceae are added to our account of monocots, the new total rises to 35 families, 272 genera and 759 species. The differences in number from Britton’s and Wilson’s (1926) treatment is attributed to changes in families, generic and species concepts, recent introductions, naturalization of introduced species and cultivars, exclusion of cultivated plants, misdeterminations, and discoveries of new taxa or new distributional records during the last seven decades.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius Andersoni (Chant) As a Potential Biocontrol Agent Against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants
    insects Article A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) as a Potential Biocontrol Agent against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants Ewa Puchalska 1,* , Stanisław Kamil Zagrodzki 1, Marcin Kozak 2, Brian G. Rector 3 and Anna Mauer 1 1 Section of Applied Entomology, Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (S.K.Z.); [email protected] (A.M.) 2 Department of Media, Journalism and Social Communication, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS, Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, 920 Valley Rd., Reno, NV 89512, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) is a predatory mite frequently used as a biocontrol agent against phytophagous mites in greenhouses, orchards and vineyards. In Europe, it is an indige- nous species, commonly found on various plants, including conifers. The present study examined whether A. andersoni can develop and reproduce while feeding on two key pests of ornamental coniferous plants, i.e., Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) and Pentamerismus taxi (Haller). Pinus sylvestris L. pollen was also tested as an alternative food source for the predator. Both prey species and pine pollen were suitable food sources for A. andersoni. Although higher values of population parameters Citation: Puchalska, E.; were observed when the predator fed on mites compared to the pollen alternative, we conclude that Zagrodzki, S.K.; Kozak, M.; pine pollen may provide adequate sustenance for A.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Article Effect of Fertilization on Yield and NPK
    1 Original Research Article 2 Effect of fertilization on yield and NPK contents 3 in red ginger 4 65 7 ABSTRACT 8 Aim: The aim of the research was to evaluate the effect of NPK fertilization on red ginger yield and nutrient content of mature plants. Study design: 16 treatments were defined from N, P and K combinations, with three replications in complete random blocks. The experimental unit was one cluster with stems. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted from February 2012 to January 2013 on a 10-years-old commercial plantation. The plantation is located at 18° 17’ 43.49’’ NL and 93° 12’ 28.68’’ WL in Comalcalco, Tabasco, Mexico. Methodology: Each 15 days along a year were recorded variables for the cluster, and for commercial stems and flowers. Then one plant per experimental unit was separated into flower, leaf, stem and rhizome to analyze NPK. With the data, an analysis of variance, means comparison (Tukey, P ≤ 0.05), and Pearson correlation were performed. Results: With the doses of 216-00-00 kg NPK ha-1, the plants developed the largest stem (2.17 cm) and flower (6.33 cm) diameters and the highest dry commercial (28.89 g) and total (199.3 g) biomass. The highest fresh weight of the non-commercial biomass (383.2 g) was found in plants fertilized with 322-04-90, but this value was statistically equal to that obtained with the doses 216-00-00 (335.81 g). The NPK content found in red ginger leaf, stem, flower and rhizome satisfied the requirements established for P, but not for N and K.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Palm Mite, Raoiella Indica Hirst (Arachnida: Acari: Tenuipalpidae)1 Marjorie A
    EENY-397 Red Palm Mite, Raoiella indica Hirst (Arachnida: Acari: Tenuipalpidae)1 Marjorie A. Hoy, Jorge Peña, and Ru Nguyen2 Introduction Description and Life Cycle The red palm mite, Raoiella indica Hirst, a pest of several Mites in the family Tenuipalpidae are commonly called important ornamental and fruit-producing palm species, “false spider mites” and are all plant feeders. However, has invaded the Western Hemisphere and is in the process only a few species of tenuipalpids in a few genera are of of colonizing islands in the Caribbean, as well as other areas economic importance. The tenuipalpids have stylet-like on the mainland. mouthparts (a stylophore) similar to that of spider mites (Tetranychidae). The mouthparts are long, U-shaped, with Distribution whiplike chelicerae that are used for piercing plant tissues. Tenuipalpids feed by inserting their chelicerae into plant Until recently, the red palm mite was found in India, Egypt, tissue and removing the cell contents. These mites are small Israel, Mauritius, Reunion, Sudan, Iran, Oman, Pakistan, and flat and usually feed on the under surface of leaves. and the United Arab Emirates. However, in 2004, this pest They are slow moving and do not produce silk, as do many was detected in Martinique, Dominica, Guadeloupe, St. tetranychid (spider mite) species. Martin, Saint Lucia, Trinidad, and Tobago in the Caribbean. In November 2006, this pest was found in Puerto Rico. Adults: Females of Raoiella indica average 245 microns (0.01 inches) long and 182 microns (0.007 inches) wide, are In 2007, the red palm mite was discovered in Florida. As of oval and reddish in color.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization in the Genus Phoenix: a Review
    Emir. J. Food Agric. 2013. 25 (11): 831-842 doi: 10.9755/ejfa.v25i11.16660 http://www.ejfa.info/ REVIEW ARTICLE Hybridization in the genus Phoenix: A review Muriel Gros-Balthazard* University of Fribourg, Department of Biology, Biochemistry, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland Abstract The genus Phoenix is composed of 14 species naturally distributed in the Old World. This genus comprises the date palm, Phoenix dactylifera L., cultivated for its fruits, the dates, while other species are grown for food, ornament and religious purposes. Phoenix species were, for these reasons, spread out of their natural distribution area. It is therefore common to find species not naturally sympatric, growing together, in cultivation or in the wild. Phoenix species are interfertile and crossing distinct species leads to fertile hybrid offspring (interspecific hybridization). The introduction of a species in the wild generates gene flows leading to the creation of new hybrids and has conservation implications. In cultivation, such crossings may be spontaneous or are the result of artificial pollination, as several reasons impel doing so. Crossing gives rise to beautiful hybrids and is also useful for the conservation of old palm groves threatened by pests. Moreover, artificial pollination of date palms using another Phoenix species can be of interest given the metaxenic pollen effects. In addition, this process may have some potential benefits in date palm improvements, by the creation of hybrid cultivars. Thus, an increasing need of hybrid detection and characterization exists, particularly as morphology alone is not sufficient for this task. Besides new methods such as traditional and geometric morphometrics that may bring new clues, the advent of genetic and molecular markers helps to detect hybrids, especially based on the combination of nuclear and chloroplastic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mite Composition Comprising a Predatory Mite and Immobilized
    (19) TZZ _ __T (11) EP 2 612 551 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A01K 67/033 (2006.01) A01N 63/00 (2006.01) 05.11.2014 Bulletin 2014/45 A01N 35/02 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 12189587.4 (22) Date of filing: 23.10.2012 (54) Mite composition comprising a predatory mite and immobilized prey contacted with a fungus reducing agent and methods and uses related to the use of said composition Milbenzusammensetzung mit einer Raubmilbenart und mit einem Pilzreduktionsmittel in Kontakt gekommenes immobilisiertes Beutetier sowie Verfahren und Verwendungen im Zusammenhang mit dem Einsatz dieser Zusammensetzung Composition d’acariens comprenant des acariens prédateurs et proie immobilisée mise en contact avec un agent réducteur de champignon et procédés et utilisations associés à l’utilisation de ladite composition (84) Designated Contracting States: EP-A1- 2 380 436 WO-A1-2007/075081 AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO • CROSS J V ET AL: "EFFECT OF REPEATED PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR FOLIAR SPRAYS OF INSECTICIDES OR FUNGICIDES ON ORGANOPHOSPHATE- (30) Priority: 04.01.2012 US 201261583152 P RESISTANT STRAINS OF THE ORCHARD PREDATORY MITE TYPHLODROMUS PYRI ON (43) Date of publication of application: APPLE", CROP PROTECTION, ELSEVIER 10.07.2013 Bulletin 2013/28 SCIENCE, GB, vol. 13, 1 January 1994 (1994-01-01), pages 39-44, XP000917959, ISSN: (73) Proprietor: Koppert B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 503 the Vascular Plants Of
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 503 THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF MAJURO ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS BY NANCY VANDER VELDE ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST 2003 Uliga Figure 1. Majuro Atoll THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF MAJURO ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS ABSTRACT Majuro Atoll has been a center of activity for the Marshall Islands since 1944 and is now the major population center and port of entry for the country. Previous to the accompanying study, no thorough documentation has been made of the vascular plants of Majuro Atoll. There were only reports that were either part of much larger discussions on the entire Micronesian region or the Marshall Islands as a whole, and were of a very limited scope. Previous reports by Fosberg, Sachet & Oliver (1979, 1982, 1987) presented only 115 vascular plants on Majuro Atoll. In this study, 563 vascular plants have been recorded on Majuro. INTRODUCTION The accompanying report presents a complete flora of Majuro Atoll, which has never been done before. It includes a listing of all species, notation as to origin (i.e. indigenous, aboriginal introduction, recent introduction), as well as the original range of each. The major synonyms are also listed. For almost all, English common names are presented. Marshallese names are given, where these were found, and spelled according to the current spelling system, aside from limitations in diacritic markings. A brief notation of location is given for many of the species. The entire list of 563 plants is provided to give the people a means of gaining a better understanding of the nature of the plants of Majuro Atoll.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of the Pre-Human Avifauna of the Mascarene Islands
    – 195 – Paleornithological Research 2013 Proceed. 8th Inter nat. Meeting Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution Ursula B. Göhlich & Andreas Kroh (Eds) A synopsis of the pre-human avifauna of the Mascarene Islands JULIAN P. HUME Bird Group, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Tring, UK Abstract — The isolated Mascarene Islands of Mauritius, Réunion and Rodrigues are situated in the south- western Indian Ocean. All are volcanic in origin and have never been connected to each other or any other land mass. Despite their comparatively close proximity to each other, each island differs topographically and the islands have generally distinct avifaunas. The Mascarenes remained pristine until recently, resulting in some documentation of their ecology being made before they rapidly suffered severe degradation by humans. The first major fossil discoveries were made in 1865 on Mauritius and on Rodrigues and in the late 20th century on Réunion. However, for both Mauritius and Rodrigues, the documented fossil record initially was biased toward larger, non-passerine bird species, especially the dodo Raphus cucullatus and solitaire Pezophaps solitaria. This paper provides a synopsis of the fossil Mascarene avifauna, which demonstrates that it was more diverse than previously realised. Therefore, as the islands have suffered severe anthropogenic changes and the fossil record is far from complete, any conclusions based on present avian biogeography must be viewed with caution. Key words: Mauritius, Réunion, Rodrigues, ecological history, biogeography, extinction Introduction ily described or illustrated in ships’ logs and journals, which became the source material for The Mascarene Islands of Mauritius, Réunion popular articles and books and, along with col- and Rodrigues are situated in the south-western lected specimens, enabled monographs such as Indian Ocean (Fig.
    [Show full text]