The Blood Systems of Safoella and Spirographis. by D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Some Quantitative Aspects of Feeding in Sabellid and Serpulid Fan Worms
J. mar. bioI. Ass. U.K. (I957) 36, 309-316 309 Printed in Great Britain SOME QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF FEEDING IN SABELLID AND SERPULID FAN WORMS By R. PHILLIPS DALES Bedford College, University of London INTRODUCTION It is apparent, from J0rgensen's recent review (1955) of quantitative aspects of filter feeding in invertebrates, that virtually nothing is known of the rate of filtering in polychaete suspension feeders, of which the sabellid and serpulid fan worms are perhaps the most important. There seems to be little variation in the filter-feeding mechanism in different sabellid and serpulid polychaetes. The most detailed account of the feeding mechanism of these worms is that of Sabella published by Nicol (1930) with a resume of earlier work on sabellids and serpulids. Some in• formation on feeding and the anatomy of the crown in other genera may be found in the works of Soulier, 1891 (Serpula, Hydroides, Protula, Branchi• omma, Spirographis and Myxicola), Johansson, 1927 (Serpula and Pomato• ceros) and Thomas, 1940 (Pomatoceros). That the crown arises as a paired structure from the prostomium was shown by Wilson (1936) in Branchiomma. In adults, the crown may retain a clearly divided form, as in many serpulids such as Pomatoceros, or form an almost continuous single cone as in Myxicola or Salmacina. It is not, however, the purpose of the present paper to describe these variations in morphology, but to present some quantitative data on the filtering process. The species investigated were those which could be ob• tained in sufficient quantity at Plymouth. The results of experiments on the sabellids, Myxicola infundibulum (Renier) and Sabella pavonina Savigny, and on the serpulids, Pomatoceros triqueter (L.), Hydroides norvegica (Gunnerus), Spirorbis borealis Daudin, and Salmacina dysteri (Huxley) are presented here. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) Based on 18S Rdna Sequence Data, and Implications for Opercular Evolution Janina Lehrkea,Ã, Harry A
ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2007) 195–206 www.elsevier.de/ode Phylogenetic relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) based on 18S rDNA sequence data, and implications for opercular evolution Janina Lehrkea,Ã, Harry A. ten Hoveb, Tara A. Macdonaldc, Thomas Bartolomaeusa, Christoph Bleidorna,1 aInstitute for Zoology, Animal Systematics and Evolution, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Koenigin-Luise-Street 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany bZoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands cBamfield Marine Sciences Centre, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada, V0R 1B0 Received 19 December 2005; accepted 2 June 2006 Abstract Phylogenetic relationships of (19) serpulid taxa (including Spirorbinae) were reconstructed based on 18S rRNA gene sequence data. Maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and maximum parsimony methods were used in phylogenetic reconstruction. Regardless of the method used, monophyly of Serpulidae is confirmed and four monophyletic, well- supported major clades are recovered: the Spirorbinae and three groups hitherto referred to as the Protula-, Serpula-, and Pomatoceros-group. Contrary to the taxonomic literature and the hypothesis of opercular evolution, the Protula- clade contains non-operculate (Protula, Salmacina) and operculate taxa both with pinnulate and non-pinnulate peduncle (Filograna vs. Vermiliopsis), and most likely is the sister group to Spirorbinae. Operculate Serpulinae and poorly or non-operculate Filograninae are paraphyletic. It is likely that lack of opercula in some serpulid genera is not a plesiomorphic character state, but reflects a special adaptation. r 2007 Gesellschaft fu¨r Biologische Systematik. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Serpulidae; Phylogeny; Operculum; 18S rRNA gene; Annelida; Polychaeta Introduction distinctive calcareous tubes and bilobed tentacular crowns, each with numerous radioles that bear shorter Serpulids are common members of marine hard- secondary branches (pinnules) on the inner side. -
DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1. -
Mapping and Distribution of Sabella Spallanzanii in Port Phillip Bay Final
Mapping and distribution of Sabellaspallanzanii in Port Phillip Bay Final Report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC Project 94/164) G..D. Parry, M.M. Lockett, D.P. Crookes, N. Coleman and M.A. Sinclair May 1996 Mapping and distribution of Sabellaspallanzanii in Port Phillip Bay Final Report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC Project 94/164) G.D. Parry1, M. Lockett1, D. P. Crookes1, N. Coleman1 and M. Sinclair2 May 1996 1Victorian Fisheries Research Institute Departmentof Conservation and Natural Resources PO Box 114, Queenscliff,Victoria 3225 2Departmentof Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Monash University Clayton Victoria 3068 Contents Page Technical and non-technical summary 2 Introduction 3 Background 3 Need 4 Objectives 4 Methods 5 Results 5 Benefits 5 Intellectual Property 6 Further Development 6 Staff 6 Final cost 7 Distribution 7 Acknow ledgments 8 References 8 Technical and Non-technical Summary • The sabellid polychaete Sabella spallanzanii, a native to the Mediterranean, established in Port Phillip Bay in the late 1980s. Initially it was found only in Corio Bay, but during the past fiveyears it has spread so that it now occurs throughout the western half of Port Phillip Bay. • Densities of Sabella in many parts of the bay remain low but densities are usually higher (up to 13/m2 ) in deeper water and they extend into shallower depths in calmer regions. • Sabella larvae probably require a 'hard' surface (shell fragment, rock, seaweed, mollusc or sea squirt) for initial attachment, but subsequently they may use their own tube as an anchor in soft sediment . • Changes to fish communities following the establishment of Sabella were analysed using multidimensional scaling and BACI (Before, After, Control, Impact) design analyses of variance. -
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber ......................................................................... -
Allozyme Variation in the Marine Fanworm Sabella Spallanzanii: Comparison of Native European and Introduced Australian Populations
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 152: 131-143, 1997 Published June 26 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1 Allozyme variation in the marine fanworm Sabella spallanzanii: comparison of native European and introduced Australian populations Jane Andrew, Robert D. Ward* CSIRO Division of Marine Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart. Tasmania 7001, Australia ABSTRACT. Three Austral~an(Cockburn Sound, Western Australia, Adelaide, South Australia. Port Ph~llipBay, Victoria) and four European (Roscoff, Atlantic; Alicante, Carteau, and Marseille, all from the Mediterranean Sea) populations of Sabella spallanzanii were exam~nedfor variation at 23 allozyme loci. Levels of genetlc variation were high, with average heterozygosities per locus ranging from 0.20 to 0.21 for the Australian collections, and from 0.23 to 0.27 for the European collections. The 3 Australian collections were genetically very closely related to one another, with no stat~st~callysignificant differ- ences at any of the 15 variable locl. This suggests either an introduction to one port, with a subsequent spread to other areas, or separate introductions with subsequent extensive gene flow. The 4 European collections showed I~m~ted,but significant, d~fferent~ationamong themselves at 10 of 18 variable loc~ Much of the: heterogeneity reflected differences betlveen the Roscoff (Atlantic) collection and the 3 Mediterranean collect~ons.The Koscoff collect~onwas Iess variable, In terms of both heterozygos~ty and mean numbers of allelrs, than the hiled~terraneancollections The Australian collect~onswere more closely rclated to the Xlrditerranean collections (mean Nei distance = 0.040) than to the Roscoff collection (mean Nei distance = 0.084). If a Mediterranean origin is assumed, then the introduction to Australia was accompanied by the loss of about 18% of the original variation. -
Chaetal Loss and Replacement in Pseudopotamilla Reniformis (Sabellida, Annelida)
Invertebrate Biology 133(3): 261–273. © 2014, The American Microscopical Society, Inc. DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12061 Chaetal loss and replacement in Pseudopotamilla reniformis (Sabellida, Annelida) Glafira D. Kolbasova,1,a Alexander B. Tzetlin,2 and Elena K. Kupriyanova3 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia 2 Pertsov White Sea Biological Station, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia 3 The Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia Abstract. Chaetae are continually being replaced during the life of a polychaete, but the process of chaetal degeneration during replacement is still poorly known. Chaetal loss occurs either one at a time through special degenerative sites, or all chaetae in a chaetal sac are lost simultaneously in the absence of degenerative sites. Old chaetae can be either resorbed inside the coelom or shed. This study describes chaetal degradation, loss, and sub- sequent replacement during experimentally induced regeneration in the sabellid polychaete Pseudopotamilla reniformis. During post-traumatic regeneration in P. reniformis, abdominal- type chaetae fall from the chaetal sac simultaneously without degenerative sites, and are replaced by thoracic-type chaetae. Chaetal sac degradation occurs in three main stages: (1) formation of numerous lysosomes and small electron-transparent vesicles in follicle cell cytoplasm; (2) disintegration of follicular cell membranes; and (3) disintegration of follicular cell cytoplasm. Description of changes during parapodial transformation allows identifica- tion of signs of degradation that can serve as histological indicators of chaetal degeneration in a wide range of polychaetes. Our study suggests that chaetal degeneration and loss in polychaetes can occur either with degenerative sites or without them, depending on the type of chaetal replacement. -
A3a.2 BENTHOS A3a.2.1 Introduction A3a.2.2 UK Context
Offshore Energy SEA A3a.2 BENTHOS A3a.2.1 Introduction Available information relating to the benthos of the UKCS has been reviewed in successive SEAs – where appropriate in terms of three divisions; offshore, nearshore (to approximately 5km) from shore, and intertidal (littoral). These distinctions also correspond broadly to differences in survey methods and the coverage of both individual studies and regional programmes. In recent years there have been a number of additional data compilations and analyses, notably the Marine Natural Area profile (Jones et al. 2004) by English Nature (now Natural England), the UKSeaMap marine landscape classification (Connor et al. 2006) and the Mapping European Seabed Habitats (MESH) programme (MESH Partnership 2008), and some additional acquisition of data. Similarly, there have been developments in terms of conservation with OSPAR establishing a list of threatened and/or declining species and habitats in the North-East Atlantic, revisions to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan, and site designations. Increasing attention has also been focused on the assessment of changes in benthic community structure and function, in relation to the effects of regional climate change. A3a.2.2 UK context Over a period of nearly one hundred years, the biology of the seabed has been studied in the context of fisheries ecology and, latterly, in relation to biogeographical patterns of species distribution. More recently, numerous smaller spatial scale investigations of the seabed have been carried out, concerned primarily with environmental monitoring of various industrial activities (e.g. oil and gas developments, aggregate extraction, and sewage sludge dumping. Benthic communities identified by various authors show consistency at a high level, and strong correlation with habitat (or substrate) type. -
Joko Pamungkas" CACING Lalit DAN KEINDAHANNYA
Oseana, Volume XXXVI, Nomor 2, Tahun 2011: 21-29 ISSN 0216- 1877 CACING LAlIT DAN KEINDAHANNYA Oleh Joko Pamungkas" ABSTRACT MARINE WORMS AND THEIR BEAUTY. Many people generally assume that a worm is always ugly. Nonetheless, particular species of polychaete marine worms (Annelida) belonging to the family Serpulidae and Sabel/idae reveal something different. They are showy, beautiful and attractive. Moreover, they are unlike a worm. For many years, these species of seaworms have been fascinating many divers. For their unique shape, these animals are well known as jan worm't'peacock worm'Z'feather-duster worm' (Sabella pavonina Savigny, 1822) and 'christmas-tree worm' iSpirobranchus giganteus Pallas, 1766). PENDAHULUAN bahwa hewan yang dijumpai tersebut adalah seekor cacing. Hal ini karena morfologi eaeing Apa yang terbersit dalam benak tersebut jauh bcrbeda dengan wujud eacing kita manakala kata "cacing ' disebut? yang biasa dijurnpai di darat. Membayangkannya, asosiasi kita biasanya Cacing yang dimaksud ialab cacing laut langsung tertuju pada makhluk buruk rupa yang Polikaeta (Filum Annelida) dari jenis Sabella hidup di tcmpat-tempat kotor, Bentuknya yang pavonina Sevigny, 1822 (Suku Sabellidae) dan filiform dengan wama khas kernerahan kerap membuat hewan inidicap sebagai binatang yang Spirobranchus giganteus Pallas, 1766 (Suku menjijikkan.Cacing juga sering dianggap Serpulidae). Dua fauna laut inisetidaknya dapat sebagai sumber penyakit yang harus dijaubi dianggap sebagai penghias karang yang telah karena dalam dunia medis beberapa penyakit memikat begitu banyak penyelam. Sebagai memang disebabkan oleh fauna ini. cacing, mereka memiliki benmk tubuh yang Padahal, anggapan terscbut tidak "tidak lazirn" narmm sangat menarik. sepenuhnya benar. Di a1am bawah laut, Tulisan ini mengulas beberapa aspek khususnya zona terumbu karang, kita bisa biologi cacing laut polikaeta dari jenis S. -
Sabella Spallanzanii (Gmelin, 1791)
Sabella spallanzanii (Gmelin, 1791) AphiaID: 130969 ESPIRÓGRAFO Animalia (Reino) > Annelida (Filo) > Polychaeta (Classe) > Sedentaria (Subclasse) > Canalipalpata (Infraclasse) > Sabellida (Ordem) > Sabellidae (Familia) © Vasco Ferreira Vasco Ferreira © Vasco Ferreira Vasco Ferreira 1 © Vasco Ferreira © Vasco Ferreira Estatuto de Conservação Sinónimos Amphitrite ventilabrum [sensu Lamarck, 1818] Amphitrite ventilabrum Gmelin, 1791 Corallina Tubularia-Melitensis Ellis, 1755 Nereis lutraria Pallas, 1766 Sabella gracillima Kinberg, 1866 Sabella penicillum [auct. misspelling] Sabella penicillus (Linnaeus, 1758) Sabella sarsi [auct. misspelling] Sabella sarsii Krøyer, 1856 Sabella unispira Cuvier, 1816 Sabella viola Grube, 1863 Sabella viridis Milne Edwards in Quatrefages, 1866 Serpula penicillus Linnaeus, 1758 Spirographis elegans Quatrefages, 1866 Spirographis gracilis Hansen, 1882 Spirographis imperialis Hansen, 1882 Spirographis longispira Quatrefages, 1866 Spirographis spallanzanii (Viviani, 1805) Tubularia spallanzanii Gmelin, 1791 2 Referências additional source Biosis; Index To Organism Names, available online at http://www.biosis.org.uk/ion/results.asp [details] additional source Bellan, Gerard. (2001). Polychaeta, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels. 50: pp. 214-231. [details] original description Gmelin, J.F. (1791). Vermes. In: Gmelin J.F. (Ed.) Caroli a Linnaei Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Ed. 10. Tome 1(6). G.E. Beer, Lipsiae [Leipzig]. pp. 3021-3910. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/83098#5 [details] additional source Fattorini, Daniele and Regoli, Francesco 2006. Arsenic speciation in tissues of the Mediterranean Polychaete Sabella spallanzanii. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23(8):1881-1887 [details] redescription Knight-Jones, Phyllis and Perkins, Thomas H. -
Monitoring and Surveillance for Non-Indigenous Species in UK Marine Waters
Cefas contract report C5955 (objective 2) Monitoring and surveillance for non-indigenous species in UK marine waters Authors: Paul Stebbing, Joanna Murray, Paul Whomersley and Hannah Tidbury Issue date: 21/10/14 Cefas Document Control Monitoring and surveillance for non-indigenous species in UK marine waters Submitted to: Deborah Hembury (Defra) Date submitted: 21/10/14 Project Manager: Paul Stebbing Report compiled by: Paul Stebbing Quality control by: Paul Stebbing, Joanne Murray, Hannah Tidbury, Paul Whomersley Approved by & date: Dr. Edmund Peeler Version: 3 Version Control History Author Date Comment Version J. Murray et al. 11/04/14 Comments received 1 from Defra and NRW P. Stebbing et al 23/6/14 Response to 2 comments from NRW and Defra P.Stebbing et al 21/10/14 Response to 3 comments from NRW and project steering group Monitoring and surveillance for non-indigenous species in the marine environment Page i Monitoring and surveillance for non-indigenous species in UK marine waters Page ii Monitoring and surveillance for non-indigenous species in UK marine waters Paul Stebbing, Joanna Murray, Paul Whomersley and Hannah Tidbury Issue date: 21/10/14 Head office Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK Tel +44 (0) 1502 56 2244 Fax +44 (0) 1502 51 3865 www.cefas.co.uk Cefas is an executive agency of Defra Monitoring and surveillance for non-indigenous species in UK marine waters Page iii Executive Summary The threat non-indigenous species (NIS) pose to global biodiversity loss is considered to be second only to habitat destruction since NIS have devastated terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems across all continents. -
Farnes East Rmcz Summary Site Report
Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Contract Reference: MB0120 Report Number: 3 Version 10 March 2015 Project Title: Coordination of the Defra MCZ data collection programme Report No 3. Title: Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Project Code: MB0120 Defra Contract Manager: Carole Kelly Funded by: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Marine Science and Evidence Unit Marine Directorate Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY Authorship: Jacqueline Eggleton Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] David Stephens Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Dr Markus Diesing Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Dr Sue Ware Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Matthew Curtis Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Acknowledgements We thank Dr Roger Coggan (Cefas) for editing the text of earlier drafts of this report. Disclaimer: The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views of Defra, nor is Defra liable for the accuracy of information provided, or responsible for any use of the reports content. Although the data provided in this report has been quality assured, the final products - e.g. habitat maps – may be subject to revision following