DOCSLIB.ORG

Farnes East Rmcz Summary Site Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Farnes East Rmcz Summary Site Report Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Contract Reference: MB0120 Report Number: 3 Version 10 March 2015 Project Title: Coordination of the Defra MCZ data collection programme Report No 3. Title: Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Project Code: MB0120 Defra Contract Manager: Carole Kelly Funded by: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Marine Science and Evidence Unit Marine Directorate Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY Authorship: Jacqueline Eggleton Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] David Stephens Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Dr Markus Diesing Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Dr Sue Ware Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Matthew Curtis Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) [email protected] Acknowledgements We thank Dr Roger Coggan (Cefas) for editing the text of earlier drafts of this report. Disclaimer: The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views of Defra, nor is Defra liable for the accuracy of information provided, or responsible for any use of the reports content. Although the data provided in this report has been quality assured, the final products - e.g. habitat maps – may be subject to revision following any further data provision or once they have been used in SNCB advice or assessments. Cefas Document Control Title: Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report Submitted to: Marine Protected Areas Survey Co-ordination & Evidence Delivery Group Date submitted: March 2015 Project Manager: David Limpenny Report compiled by: Jackie Eggleton, David Stephens, Markus Diesing, Sue Ware, Matt Curtis Quality control by: Roger Coggan, Christopher Barrio Approved by & date: Keith Weston (02/03/2015) Version: V10 Version Control History Author Date Comment Version Jackie Eggleton et al. 20/08/2012 First draft V1 Jackie Eggleton et al. 03/09/2012 Edited draft following internal QA V2 Jackie Eggleton et al. 27/09/2012 Re-edited draft to include partner logos and V3 version control document Jackie Eggleton et al. 14/11/2012 Edited following Project Steering Group V4 review Jackie Eggleton et al. 11/01/2013 Final edits ready for sign-off V5 Jackie Eggleton et al. 28/02/2013 Edited following additional PSG comments V6 and peer review Jackie Eggleton et al. 26/03/2013 Cefas final QA V7 Christopher Barrio 01/04/2014 Revised following updated mud HOCI V8 definitions Jackie Eggleton et al. 10/12/2014 Updated habitat map and report text using V9 data collected on CEND0514 Jackie Eggleton et al. 27/02/2015 PSG comments addressed V10 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ i List of Tables .............................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................. iv 1 Executive Summary: Report Card ................................................................. 1 1.1 Features proposed in the SAD for inclusion within the MCZ designation ...... 1 1.2 Features present but not proposed in the SAD for inclusion within the rMCZ designation .................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Evidence of human activities within the rMCZ ............................................... 2 2 Introduction ................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location of the rMCZ ..................................................................................... 4 2.2 Rationale for the site position and designation .............................................. 4 2.3 Rationale for prioritising this rMCZ for additional evidence collection ........... 5 2.4 Survey aims and objectives .......................................................................... 6 3 Methods ........................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Acoustic data acquisition ............................................................................... 7 3.2 Ground truth sample acquisition .................................................................... 7 3.3 Production of the updated habitat map ......................................................... 9 3.4 Quality of the updated map ......................................................................... 14 4 Results ........................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Site Assessment Document (SAD) habitat map .......................................... 16 4.2 Updated habitat map based on new survey data ........................................ 16 4.3 Quality of the updated habitat map ............................................................. 19 4.4 Broadscale habitats identified ..................................................................... 19 4.5 Habitat FOCI identified ................................................................................ 20 4.6 Species FOCI identified .............................................................................. 21 4.7 Other features identified .............................................................................. 22 4.8 Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) ...................................... 22 4.9 Data limitations and adequacy of the updated habitat map ......................... 23 4.10 Observations of human activities within the rMCZ ...................................... 23 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 25 5.1 Presence and extent of broadscale habitats ............................................... 25 5.2 Presence and extent of FOCI habitats ........................................................ 25 5.3 Presence and distribution of species FOCI ................................................. 26 5.4 Evidence of human activities within the rMCZ ............................................. 26 References ............................................................................................................... 27 Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report i Data sources ............................................................................................................ 30 Annexes ................................................................................................................... 31 Annex 1. Broadscale habitat features listed in the ENG ...................................... 31 Annex 2. Habitat FOCI listed in the ENG. ............................................................ 32 Annex 3. Low or limited mobility species FOCI listed in the ENG. ....................... 33 Annex 4. Highly mobile species FOCI listed in the ENG. ..................................... 34 Annex 5. Video and stills processing protocol ..................................................... 35 Appendices .............................................................................................................. 37 Appendix 1. ........................................................................................................... 37 Appendix 2. Outputs from Acoustic Surveys ........................................................ 44 Appendix 3. Evidence of human activities within the rMCZ ................................. 46 Appendix 4. Species List ..................................................................................... 47 Appendix 5. Analyses of sediment samples: classification and composition ....... 63 Appendix 6. BSH/EUNIS Level 3 descriptions derived from video and stills ........ 67 Appendix 7. Example images from survey for broadscale habitats ..................... 75 Appendix 8. Example images from survey for habitat FOCI ................................ 77 Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report ii List of Tables Table 1. Broadscale habitats for which this rMCZ was proposed for designation. .... 5 Table 2. Habitat FOCI for which this rMCZ was proposed for designation. ............... 5 Table 3. Species FOCI for which this rMCZ was proposed for designation. .............. 5 Table 4. Description of derivatives calculated for bathymetry and backscatter (where specified). ........................................................................................................ 11 Table 5. Broadscale habitats identified in this rMCZ. .............................................. 20 Table 6. Habitat FOCI identified in Farnes East rMCZ. ........................................... 20 Table 7. Species FOCI identified in this rMCZ. ....................................................... 21 Table 8. Details of human activities found in the bathymetry data. ......................... 24 Farnes East rMCZ Post-survey Site Report iii List of Figures Figure 1. Location of the Farnes East rMCZ in the context of other rMCZs in the area.................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Location of ground truth sampling sites collected on CEND0412 and CEND0514 at
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mesh-Size Matters in Epibenthic Surveys
    J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. 12002), 82,1^8 Printed in the United Kingdom Mesh-size matters in epibenthic surveys Ruth Callaway*P, Simon JenningsP, John Lancaster* and John CotterO *University ofWales Swansea, School ofBiological Sciences, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales, SA2 8PP. OCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, Norfolk, NR33 0HT. PCorresponding author 1ne¨ eR.Zu« hlke): e-mail: [email protected] This study aimed to identify the e¡ects of di¡erent sieve mesh-sizes on processing time, the number of species retained, diversity measures and multivariate community analysis in the North Sea. Samples were collected at 63 sites throughout the North Sea and washed through two successive sieves, 10-mm and 5-mm mesh respectively. Processing time for whole samples 15- and 10-mm fraction) averaged 91 Æ25 min compared with 55 Æ16 min for the 10-mm mesh fraction. Altogether 40% of free-living species and 9% of attached species were recorded exclusively in the 5-mm fraction. The majority of these species were rare. Spatial gradients of species diversity and community structure were identical, independent ofthe mesh-size used. Multivariate community analysis showed no signi¢cant di¡erence between descriptions ofcommunity structure based on fauna from 10-mm or 5-mm mesh. The use ofcoarser sieving mesh would save time and money, ifthe aims ofan epibenthic survey were to describe broad patterns ofcommunity structure and relative diversity. It would be possible to process approximately 50% more samples, ifthe time saved with 10-mm mesh were allocated to additional sampling. However, ifinformation on single species is required, then sorting with the ¢ner sieve mesh will yield crucial information.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Quantitative Aspects of Feeding in Sabellid and Serpulid Fan Worms
    J. mar. bioI. Ass. U.K. (I957) 36, 309-316 309 Printed in Great Britain SOME QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF FEEDING IN SABELLID AND SERPULID FAN WORMS By R. PHILLIPS DALES Bedford College, University of London INTRODUCTION It is apparent, from J0rgensen's recent review (1955) of quantitative aspects of filter feeding in invertebrates, that virtually nothing is known of the rate of filtering in polychaete suspension feeders, of which the sabellid and serpulid fan worms are perhaps the most important. There seems to be little variation in the filter-feeding mechanism in different sabellid and serpulid polychaetes. The most detailed account of the feeding mechanism of these worms is that of Sabella published by Nicol (1930) with a resume of earlier work on sabellids and serpulids. Some in• formation on feeding and the anatomy of the crown in other genera may be found in the works of Soulier, 1891 (Serpula, Hydroides, Protula, Branchi• omma, Spirographis and Myxicola), Johansson, 1927 (Serpula and Pomato• ceros) and Thomas, 1940 (Pomatoceros). That the crown arises as a paired structure from the prostomium was shown by Wilson (1936) in Branchiomma. In adults, the crown may retain a clearly divided form, as in many serpulids such as Pomatoceros, or form an almost continuous single cone as in Myxicola or Salmacina. It is not, however, the purpose of the present paper to describe these variations in morphology, but to present some quantitative data on the filtering process. The species investigated were those which could be ob• tained in sufficient quantity at Plymouth. The results of experiments on the sabellids, Myxicola infundibulum (Renier) and Sabella pavonina Savigny, and on the serpulids, Pomatoceros triqueter (L.), Hydroides norvegica (Gunnerus), Spirorbis borealis Daudin, and Salmacina dysteri (Huxley) are presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) Based on 18S Rdna Sequence Data, and Implications for Opercular Evolution Janina Lehrkea,Ã, Harry A
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2007) 195–206 www.elsevier.de/ode Phylogenetic relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) based on 18S rDNA sequence data, and implications for opercular evolution Janina Lehrkea,Ã, Harry A. ten Hoveb, Tara A. Macdonaldc, Thomas Bartolomaeusa, Christoph Bleidorna,1 aInstitute for Zoology, Animal Systematics and Evolution, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Koenigin-Luise-Street 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany bZoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands cBamfield Marine Sciences Centre, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada, V0R 1B0 Received 19 December 2005; accepted 2 June 2006 Abstract Phylogenetic relationships of (19) serpulid taxa (including Spirorbinae) were reconstructed based on 18S rRNA gene sequence data. Maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and maximum parsimony methods were used in phylogenetic reconstruction. Regardless of the method used, monophyly of Serpulidae is confirmed and four monophyletic, well- supported major clades are recovered: the Spirorbinae and three groups hitherto referred to as the Protula-, Serpula-, and Pomatoceros-group. Contrary to the taxonomic literature and the hypothesis of opercular evolution, the Protula- clade contains non-operculate (Protula, Salmacina) and operculate taxa both with pinnulate and non-pinnulate peduncle (Filograna vs. Vermiliopsis), and most likely is the sister group to Spirorbinae. Operculate Serpulinae and poorly or non-operculate Filograninae are paraphyletic. It is likely that lack of opercula in some serpulid genera is not a plesiomorphic character state, but reflects a special adaptation. r 2007 Gesellschaft fu¨r Biologische Systematik. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Serpulidae; Phylogeny; Operculum; 18S rRNA gene; Annelida; Polychaeta Introduction distinctive calcareous tubes and bilobed tentacular crowns, each with numerous radioles that bear shorter Serpulids are common members of marine hard- secondary branches (pinnules) on the inner side.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Norwegian Sea Slugs (Nudibranchia): New Species to Norwegian Coastal Waters and New Data on Distribution of Rare Species
    Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 32: 45-52. ISSN: 1502-4873 Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species Jussi Evertsen1 and Torkild Bakken1 Evertsen J, Bakken T. 2013. Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species. Fauna norvegica 32: 45-52. A total of 5 nudibranch species are reported from the Norwegian coast for the first time (Doridoxa ingolfiana, Goniodoris castanea, Onchidoris sparsa, Eubranchus rupium and Proctonotus mucro- niferus). In addition 10 species that can be considered rare in Norwegian waters are presented with new information (Lophodoris danielsseni, Onchidoris depressa, Palio nothus, Tritonia griegi, Tritonia lineata, Hero formosa, Janolus cristatus, Cumanotus beaumonti, Berghia norvegica and Calma glau- coides), in some cases with considerable changes to their distribution. These new results present an update to our previous extensive investigation of the nudibranch fauna of the Norwegian coast from 2005, which now totals 87 species. An increase in several new species to the Norwegian fauna and new records of rare species, some with considerable updates, in relatively few years results mainly from sampling effort and contributions by specialists on samples from poorly sampled areas. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1576. Received: 2012-12-02. Accepted: 2012-12-20. Published on paper and online: 2013-02-13. Keywords: Nudibranchia, Gastropoda, taxonomy, biogeography 1. Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author: Jussi Evertsen E-mail: [email protected] IntRODUCTION the main aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report LR22
    Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report Benthic Invertebrate Component - 2017/18 LR22 26 March 2018 Author: Tim Worsfold Reviewer: David Hall, NMBAQCS Project Manager Approved by: Myles O'Reilly, Contract Manager, SEPA Contact: [email protected] MODULE / EXERCISE DETAILS Module: Laboratory Reference (LR) Exercises: LR22 Data/Sample Request Circulated: 10th July 2017 Sample Submission Deadline: 31st August 2017 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 7 Number of LR Received: 4 Contents Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Table 2. Summary of identification policy differences in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (original identifications in brackets). Appendix. LR22 individual summary reports for participating laboratories. Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Taxonomic Major Taxonomic Group LabCode Edits Polychaeta Oligochaeta Crustacea Mollusca Other Spio symphyta (Spio filicornis ) - Leucothoe procera (Leucothoe ?richardii ) - - Scolelepis bonnieri (Scolelepis squamata ) - - - - BI_2402 5 Laonice (Laonice sarsi ) - - - - Dipolydora (Dipolydora flava ) - - - - Goniada emerita (Goniadella bobrezkii ) - Nebalia reboredae (Nebalia bipes ) - - Polydora sp. A (Polydora cornuta ) - Diastylis rathkei (Diastylis cornuta ) - - BI_2403 7 Syllides? (Anoplosyllis edentula ) - Abludomelita obtusata (Tryphosa nana ) - in mixture - - Spirorbinae (Ditrupa arietina ) - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • PMNHS Bulletin Number 6, Autumn 2016
    ISSN 2054-7137 BULLETIN of the PORCUPINE MARINE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Autumn 2016 — Number 6 Bulletin of the Porcupine Marine Natural History Society No. 6 Autumn 2016 Hon. Chairman — Susan Chambers Hon. Secretary — Frances Dipper National Museums Scotland 18 High St 242 West Granton Road Landbeach Edinburgh EH5 1JA Cambridge CB25 9FT 07528 519465 [email protected] [email protected] Hon. Membership Secretary — Roni Robbins Hon. Treasurer — Jon Moore ARTOO Marine Biology Consultants, Ti Cara, Ocean Quay Marina, Point Lane, Belvidere Road, Cosheston, Southampton SO14 5QY Pembroke Dock, [email protected] Pembrokeshire SA72 4UN 01646 687946 Hon. Records Convenor — Julia Nunn [email protected] Cherry Cottage 11 Ballyhaft Road Hon. Editor — Vicki Howe Newtownards White House, Co. Down BT22 2AW Penrhos, [email protected] Raglan NP15 2LF 07779 278841 — Tammy Horton [email protected] Hon. Web-site Officer National Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, Newsletter Layout & Design European Way, — Teresa Darbyshire Southampton SO14 3ZH Department of Natural Sciences, 023 80 596 352 Amgueddfa Cymru — National Museum Wales, [email protected] Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP Porcupine MNHS welcomes new members- scientists, 029 20 573 222 students, divers, naturalists and lay people. [email protected] We are an informal society interested in marine natural history and recording particularly in the North Atlantic and ‘Porcupine Bight’. Members receive 2 Bulletins per year which include proceedings
    [Show full text]
  • Tsmm.Pdf 5.573 Mb
    ANÀLISI DELS DESCARTAMENTS EFECTUATS PER LA FLOTA D’ARROSSEGAMENT EN EL GOLF DE LLEÓ Sandra MALLOL MARTÍNEZ ISBN: 84-689-4625-7 Dipòsit legal: GI-1170-2005 Anàlisi dels descartaments efectuats per la fl ota d’arrossegament en el Golf de Lleó Sandra Mallol i Martínez Memòria redactada per Sandra Mallol i Martínez, 2005 inscrita al programa de doctorat de Biologia Ambiental, del Departament de Ciències Ambientals, per optar al grau de Doctor en Biologia per la Universitat de Girona. Aquest treball s’ha realitzat a l’Àrea de Zoologia del Departament de Ciències Ambientals de la Universitat de Girona sota la direcció de la Dra. Margarida Casadevall Masó i el Dr. Emili García-Berthou. coberta_SMallol.indd 1 23/05/2005, 11:49 Tesi Doctoral Anàlisi dels descartaments efectuats per la flota d’arrossegament en el Golf de Lleó Memòria redactada per Sandra Mallol i Martínez, inscrita al programa de doctorat de Biologia Ambiental del Departament de Ciències Ambientals, per a optar al grau de Doctora en Biologia per la Universitat de Girona. El present treball s’ha realitzat a l’Àrea de Zoologia de la Universitat de Girona sota la codirecció de la Dra. Margarida Casadevall Masó i el Dr. Emili García-Berthou. Sandra Mallol i Martínez Vist-i-plau dels directors, Dra. Margarida Casadevall Masó Dr. Emili García-Berthou Professora titular Professor titular Àrea de Zoologia Àrea d’Ecologia Departament de Ciències Ambientals Departament de Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Girona Universitat de Girona Girona, 2005 Al meu avi Falet, per haver-me ensenyat a estimar tant la mar Agraïments Quan un arriba al final de l’odissea de la tesi es fa difícil escriure aquest apartat sobretot per la por a obliadar-te d’algú, perdoneu si es dóna el cas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctenostomatous Bryozoa from São Paulo, Brazil, with Descriptions of Twelve New Species
    Zootaxa 3889 (4): 485–524 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3889.4.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0256CD93-AE8A-475F-8EB7-2418DF510AC2 Ctenostomatous Bryozoa from São Paulo, Brazil, with descriptions of twelve new species LEANDRO M. VIEIRA1,2, ALVARO E. MIGOTTO2 & JUDITH E. WINSTON3 1Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE 50670-901, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 2Centro de Biologia Marinha, Universidade de São Paulo, São Sebastião, SP 11600–000, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 3Smithsonian Marine Station, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34949, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper describes 21 ctenostomatous bryozoans from the state of São Paulo, Brazil, based on specimens observed in vivo. A new family, Jebramellidae n. fam., is erected for a newly described genus and species, Jebramella angusta n. gen. et sp. Eleven other species are described as new: Alcyonidium exiguum n. sp., Alcyonidium pulvinatum n. sp., Alcyonidium torquatum n. sp., Alcyonidium vitreum n. sp., Bowerbankia ernsti n. sp., Bowerbankia evelinae n. sp., Bow- erbankia mobilis n. sp., Nolella elizae n. sp., Panolicella brasiliensis n. sp., Sundanella rosea n. sp., Victorella araceae n. sp. Taxonomic and ecological notes are also included for nine previously described species: Aeverrillia setigera (Hincks, 1887), Alcyonidium hauffi Marcus, 1939, Alcyonidium polypylum Marcus, 1941, Anguinella palmata van Beneden, 1845, Arachnoidella evelinae (Marcus, 1937), Bantariella firmata (Marcus, 1938) n. comb., Nolella sawayai Marcus, 1938, Nolella stipata Gosse, 1855 and Zoobotryon verticillatum (delle Chiaje, 1822).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Physical Dynamics of Marine Pockmarks with Insights Into the Organic Carbon Cycling on the Malin Shelf and in the Dunmanus Bay, Ireland
    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL DYNAMICS OF MARINE POCKMARKS WITH INSIGHTS INTO THE ORGANIC CARBON CYCLING ON THE MALIN SHELF AND IN THE DUNMANUS BAY, IRELAND BY Michal Szpak, M.Sc. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Dr Brian Kelleher Dublin City University School of Chemical Sciences March, 2012 Declaration I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ____________ (Candidate) ID No.: ___________ Date: _______ Abstract Pockmarks are specific type of marine geological setting resembling craters or pits. They are considered surface expression of fluid flow in the marine subsurface. Pockmarks are widespread in the aquatic environment but the understanding of their formation mechanisms, relationship with marine macro- and micro-biota and their geochemistry remains limited. Despite numerous findings of these features in Irish waters they received little attention and remain poorly studied. In this work extensive geophysical data sets collected by the Irish National Seabed Survey and its successor the INFOMAR project as well in situ sediment samples were utilized to provide baseline information on the nature of some of these features, the processes they are fuelled by and their geochemical characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasearch Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report Summary Report
    Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report report prepared by Kate Lock, South and West Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Liz MorMorris,ris, North Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Chris Wood, National coco----ordinatorordinator Seasearch Wales 2012 Seasearch is a volunteer marine habitat and species surveying scheme for recreational divers in Britain and Ireland. It is coordinated by the Marine Conservation Society. This report summarises the Seasearch activity in Wales in 2012. It includes summaries of the sites surveyed and identifies rare or unusual species and habitats encountered. These include a number of Welsh Biodiversity Action Plan habitats and species. It does not include all of the detailed data as this has been entered into the Marine Recorder database and supplied to Natural Resources Wales for use in its marine conservation activities. The data is also available on-line through the National Biodiversity Network. During 2012 we continued to focus on Biodiversity Action Plan species and habitats and on sites that had not been previously surveyed. Data from Wales in 2012 comprised 192 Observation Forms, 154 Survey Forms and 1 sea fan record. The total of 347 represents 19% of the data for the whole of Britain and Ireland. Seasearch in Wales is delivered by two Seasearch regional coordinators. Kate Lock coordinates the South and West Wales region which extends from the Severn estuary to Aberystwyth. Liz Morris coordinates the North Wales region which extends from Aberystwyth to the Dee. The two coordinators are assisted by a number of active Seasearch Tutors, Assistant Tutors and Dive Organisers. Overall guidance and support is provided by the National Seasearch Coordinator, Chris Wood.
    [Show full text]