DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Proposal for an Orkney Scallop Regulating Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Proposal for an Orkney Scallop Regulating Order 2014 Draft Proposal for an Orkney Scallop Regulating Order Orkney Sustainable 4 Ferry Terminal Bu Kirkwall Pier, Kirkwall Orkney KW15 1HU orkneysustainablefi [1] Application to Establish a Regulating Order in terms of Sea Fisheries (Shellfish) Act 1967 for Scallop Species in and around Orkney Executive Summary Scallop fishermen in Orkney understand the principles of, and operate to ensure that, the Orkney scallop fishery can be handed as a sustainable fishery for the next generation. A result of their observation and their recent industry initiated research project ‘Spatial Dynamics in the Orkney Dive Fishery’ ( Annex VII) has prompted these fishermen seek a Regulating Order to provide for the maintenance and improvement of the fisheries for King Scallop (Pecten maximus) and Queen Scallop (Pecten opercularis) (known as queenies). As the effort being directed against the Orkney Scallop fishery does not solely arise from the operation of these progressive fishermen, having examined all the possibilities to ensure a sustainable fishery have concluded that the obtaining of a Regulating Order will be the most effective action in obtaining their objective. The King Scallop fishery makes an important contribution to Orkney’s total shellfish and whitefish industry and to the isles’ economy in general. Some shellfish stocks such as Buckies (Buccinum) and Queen Scallops in Orkney waters have been over-fished in the past and as a result their stocks have collapsed which means they can no longer contribute to the local economy nor be used as part of a flexible seasonal fishing plan by fishermen. Without proper evidence it is not possible to say what the state of many stocks are. For the King Scallop fishery however there is a picture of increased effort into the fishery and every prospect of this continuing to increase. There is concern among the King Scallop sector that uncontrolled increase in exploitation will result in over fishing causing stock collapse which in turn will have negative social and economic impacts. Some species like Queen Scallop which are economically vulnerable through over-exploitation, could benefit from stock enhancement measures managed within a regulatory framework. In response to the views of the local scallop and other fishermen Orkney Sustainable Fisheries (OSF) Ltd has undertaken to apply for and administer the powers granted by the Regulating Order with the aims of maintaining and improving the Orkney King Scallop and Queen Scallop fisheries and thus contributing to the long-term sustainability of this important local industry. One of the paramount aims of the Regulating Order will be manage sustainably a currently uncontrolled fishery for the benefit of the environment and the stock utilising mutually beneficial management measures for both. [2] [3] Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 The Regulating Order Area ...................................................................................................... 8 1.2 The Fishery .............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3 The Regulatory System ........................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Scallop Regulations ....................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 How is it introduced? .................................................................................................... 11 2 The Approach to Management ..................................................................................................... 13 2.1 The Scallop Fishery ................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 The Queen Scallop Fishery .................................................................................................... 13 3 Background Information ............................................................................................................... 15 3.1 General background Orkney ................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Fishing General...................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Other marine users ............................................................................................................... 17 3.3.1 Energy and Shipping ...................................................................................................... 18 3.3.2 Renewables Development ............................................................................................ 18 3.3.3 Leisure and Recreation ................................................................................................. 18 3.4 Other Stakeholders in the Regulating Order Area ................................................................ 18 3.5 Marine Spatial Planning ........................................................................................................ 19 3.6 Marine Environment ............................................................................................................. 20 3.6.1 Inshore aggregations of non-breeding water birds ...................................................... 20 3.6.2 Offshore aggregations of seabirds ................................................................................ 20 3.6.3 Marine Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) ................................................................ 21 3.6.4 European Protected Species ......................................................................................... 21 3.6.5 EU and Ospar Priority Marine Features (PMFs) in Scotland’s seas ............................... 21 3.6.6 Marine Protected Areas (Orkney) ................................................................................. 23 Rousay and Wyre proposed MPA ................................................................................................. 23 3.7 The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan ............................................................................ 26 3.8 Fauna ..................................................................................................................................... 27 3.8.1 Seals .............................................................................................................................. 28 3.8.2 Otters ............................................................................................................................ 28 3.8.3 Turtles ........................................................................................................................... 29 3.8.4 Cetaceans Whales and Dolphins ................................................................................... 29 3.8.5 Fish ................................................................................................................................ 29 [4] 3.8.6 Crustaceans ................................................................................................................... 29 3.8.7 Molluscs ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.8.8 Birds .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.9 The Physical environment ..................................................................................................... 30 3.9.1 Agriculture ..................................................................................................................... 31 3.9.2 Orkney Marine Habitats ................................................................................................ 31 3.9.3 Climate Change ............................................................................................................. 33 3.10 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................ 34 3.10.1 Designated Shellfish Waters in Scotland ...................................................................... 34 3.10.2 Pollution threats ........................................................................................................... 35 3.11 Biology of King Scallop .......................................................................................................... 36 3.12 Biology of Queen Scallop ...................................................................................................... 37 4 The Orkney Scallop Fishery ........................................................................................................... 39 4.1 Description of the fishery ...................................................................................................... 39 4.1.1 Hand-gathering ............................................................................................................. 39 4.1.2 Dredging from a vessel .................................................................................................. 40 4.1.3 Trawling for Queen Scallops ......................................................................................... 40 4.1.4 Seasonal fishing patterns .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epibenthic and Mobile Species Colonisation of a Geotextile Artificial Surf Reef on the South Coast of England
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Epibenthic and mobile species colonisation of a geotextile artificial surf reef on the south coast of England Roger J. H. Herbert1☯*, Ken Collins2☯, Jenny Mallinson2, Alice E. Hall1, Josephine Pegg3, Kathryn Ross4, Leo Clarke1, Tom Clements2 1 Bournemouth University, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom, 2 School of Ocean and Earth Science, a1111111111 University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, European Way, a1111111111 Southampton, United Kingdom, 3 University Centre Sparsholt, Sparsholt, Winchester, Hampshire, United a1111111111 Kingdom, 4 British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, Norfolk, United Kingdom a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS With increasing coastal infrastructure and use of novel materials there is a need to investi- Citation: Herbert RJH, Collins K, Mallinson J, Hall gate the colonisation of assemblages associated with new structures, how these differ to AE, Pegg J, Ross K, et al. (2017) Epibenthic and mobile species colonisation of a geotextile artificial natural and other artificial habitats and their potential impact on regional biodiversity. The surf reef on the south coast of England. PLoS ONE colonisation of Europe's first artificial surf reef (ASR) was investigated at Boscombe on the 12(9): e0184100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. south coast of England (2009±2014) and compared with assemblages on existing natural pone.0184100 and artificial habitats. The ASR consists of geotextile bags filled with sand located 220m Editor: Maura (Gee) Geraldine Chapman, University offshore on a sandy sea bed at a depth of 0-5m.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 9, 2008 Molluscan species of minor commercial interest in Hellenic seas: Distribution, exploitation and conservation status KATSANEVAKIS S. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra LEFKADITOU E. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources, Agios Kosmas, P.C. 16610, Elliniko, Athens GALINOU-MITSOUDI S. Fisheries & Aquaculture Technology, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, 63200, Nea Moudania KOUTSOUBAS D. University of the Aegean, Department of Marine Science, University Hill, 81100 Mytilini ZENETOS A. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources, Agios Kosmas, P.C. 16610, Elliniko, Athens https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.145 Copyright © 2008 To cite this article: KATSANEVAKIS, S., LEFKADITOU, E., GALINOU-MITSOUDI, S., KOUTSOUBAS, D., & ZENETOS, A. (2008). Molluscan species of minor commercial interest in Hellenic seas: Distribution, exploitation and conservation status. Mediterranean Marine Science, 9(1), 77-118. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.145 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 27/09/2021 17:44:35 | Review Article Mediterranean Marine Science Volume 9/1, 2008, 77-118 Molluscan species of minor commercial interest in Hellenic seas: Distribution, exploitation and conservation status S. KATSANEVAKIS1, E. LEFKADITOU1, S. GALINOU-MITSOUDI2, D. KOUTSOUBAS3 and A. ZENETOS1 1 Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Norwegian Sea Slugs (Nudibranchia): New Species to Norwegian Coastal Waters and New Data on Distribution of Rare Species
    Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 32: 45-52. ISSN: 1502-4873 Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species Jussi Evertsen1 and Torkild Bakken1 Evertsen J, Bakken T. 2013. Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species. Fauna norvegica 32: 45-52. A total of 5 nudibranch species are reported from the Norwegian coast for the first time (Doridoxa ingolfiana, Goniodoris castanea, Onchidoris sparsa, Eubranchus rupium and Proctonotus mucro- niferus). In addition 10 species that can be considered rare in Norwegian waters are presented with new information (Lophodoris danielsseni, Onchidoris depressa, Palio nothus, Tritonia griegi, Tritonia lineata, Hero formosa, Janolus cristatus, Cumanotus beaumonti, Berghia norvegica and Calma glau- coides), in some cases with considerable changes to their distribution. These new results present an update to our previous extensive investigation of the nudibranch fauna of the Norwegian coast from 2005, which now totals 87 species. An increase in several new species to the Norwegian fauna and new records of rare species, some with considerable updates, in relatively few years results mainly from sampling effort and contributions by specialists on samples from poorly sampled areas. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1576. Received: 2012-12-02. Accepted: 2012-12-20. Published on paper and online: 2013-02-13. Keywords: Nudibranchia, Gastropoda, taxonomy, biogeography 1. Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author: Jussi Evertsen E-mail: [email protected] IntRODUCTION the main aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report LR22
    Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report Benthic Invertebrate Component - 2017/18 LR22 26 March 2018 Author: Tim Worsfold Reviewer: David Hall, NMBAQCS Project Manager Approved by: Myles O'Reilly, Contract Manager, SEPA Contact: [email protected] MODULE / EXERCISE DETAILS Module: Laboratory Reference (LR) Exercises: LR22 Data/Sample Request Circulated: 10th July 2017 Sample Submission Deadline: 31st August 2017 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 7 Number of LR Received: 4 Contents Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Table 2. Summary of identification policy differences in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (original identifications in brackets). Appendix. LR22 individual summary reports for participating laboratories. Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Taxonomic Major Taxonomic Group LabCode Edits Polychaeta Oligochaeta Crustacea Mollusca Other Spio symphyta (Spio filicornis ) - Leucothoe procera (Leucothoe ?richardii ) - - Scolelepis bonnieri (Scolelepis squamata ) - - - - BI_2402 5 Laonice (Laonice sarsi ) - - - - Dipolydora (Dipolydora flava ) - - - - Goniada emerita (Goniadella bobrezkii ) - Nebalia reboredae (Nebalia bipes ) - - Polydora sp. A (Polydora cornuta ) - Diastylis rathkei (Diastylis cornuta ) - - BI_2403 7 Syllides? (Anoplosyllis edentula ) - Abludomelita obtusata (Tryphosa nana ) - in mixture - - Spirorbinae (Ditrupa arietina ) - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos
    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum MOLLUSCA
    285 MOLLUSCA: SOLENOGASTRES-POLYPLACOPHORA Phylum MOLLUSCA Class SOLENOGASTRES Family Lepidomeniidae NEMATOMENIA BANYULENSIS (Pruvot, 1891, p. 715, as Dondersia) Occasionally on Lafoea dumosa (R.A.T., S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 42-49 fm., on Lafoea dumosa (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368): Eddystone, 29 fm., 1920 (R.W.): 7, 3, 1 and 1 in 4 hauls N.E. of Eddystone, 1948 (V.F.) Breeding: gonads ripe in Aug. (R.A.T.) Family Neomeniidae NEOMENIA CARINATA Tullberg, 1875, p. 1 One specimen Rame-Eddystone Grounds, 29.12.49 (V.F.) Family Proneomeniidae PRONEOMENIA AGLAOPHENIAE Kovalevsky and Marion [Pruvot, 1891, p. 720] Common on Thecocarpus myriophyllum, generally coiled around the base of the stem of the hydroid (S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 43-49 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 367): S. of Rame Head, 27 fm., 1920 (R.W.): N. of Eddystone, 29.3.33 (A.J.S.) Class POLYPLACOPHORA (=LORICATA) Family Lepidopleuridae LEPIDOPLEURUS ASELLUS (Gmelin) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 407, as Chiton; Matthews, 1953, p. 246] Abundant, 15-30 fm., especially on muddy gravel (S.P.): at 9 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 40-43 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368, as Craspedochilus onyx) SALCOMBE. Common in dredge material (Allen and Todd, 1900, p. 210) LEPIDOPLEURUS, CANCELLATUS (Sowerby) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 410, as Chiton; Matthews. 1953, p. 246] Wembury West Reef, three specimens at E.L.W.S.T. by J. Brady, 28.3.56 (G.M.S.) Family Lepidochitonidae TONICELLA RUBRA (L.) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p.
    [Show full text]
  • PMNHS Bulletin Number 6, Autumn 2016
    ISSN 2054-7137 BULLETIN of the PORCUPINE MARINE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Autumn 2016 — Number 6 Bulletin of the Porcupine Marine Natural History Society No. 6 Autumn 2016 Hon. Chairman — Susan Chambers Hon. Secretary — Frances Dipper National Museums Scotland 18 High St 242 West Granton Road Landbeach Edinburgh EH5 1JA Cambridge CB25 9FT 07528 519465 [email protected] [email protected] Hon. Membership Secretary — Roni Robbins Hon. Treasurer — Jon Moore ARTOO Marine Biology Consultants, Ti Cara, Ocean Quay Marina, Point Lane, Belvidere Road, Cosheston, Southampton SO14 5QY Pembroke Dock, [email protected] Pembrokeshire SA72 4UN 01646 687946 Hon. Records Convenor — Julia Nunn [email protected] Cherry Cottage 11 Ballyhaft Road Hon. Editor — Vicki Howe Newtownards White House, Co. Down BT22 2AW Penrhos, [email protected] Raglan NP15 2LF 07779 278841 — Tammy Horton [email protected] Hon. Web-site Officer National Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, Newsletter Layout & Design European Way, — Teresa Darbyshire Southampton SO14 3ZH Department of Natural Sciences, 023 80 596 352 Amgueddfa Cymru — National Museum Wales, [email protected] Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP Porcupine MNHS welcomes new members- scientists, 029 20 573 222 students, divers, naturalists and lay people. [email protected] We are an informal society interested in marine natural history and recording particularly in the North Atlantic and ‘Porcupine Bight’. Members receive 2 Bulletins per year which include proceedings
    [Show full text]
  • Seasearch Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report Summary Report
    Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report report prepared by Kate Lock, South and West Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Liz MorMorris,ris, North Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Chris Wood, National coco----ordinatorordinator Seasearch Wales 2012 Seasearch is a volunteer marine habitat and species surveying scheme for recreational divers in Britain and Ireland. It is coordinated by the Marine Conservation Society. This report summarises the Seasearch activity in Wales in 2012. It includes summaries of the sites surveyed and identifies rare or unusual species and habitats encountered. These include a number of Welsh Biodiversity Action Plan habitats and species. It does not include all of the detailed data as this has been entered into the Marine Recorder database and supplied to Natural Resources Wales for use in its marine conservation activities. The data is also available on-line through the National Biodiversity Network. During 2012 we continued to focus on Biodiversity Action Plan species and habitats and on sites that had not been previously surveyed. Data from Wales in 2012 comprised 192 Observation Forms, 154 Survey Forms and 1 sea fan record. The total of 347 represents 19% of the data for the whole of Britain and Ireland. Seasearch in Wales is delivered by two Seasearch regional coordinators. Kate Lock coordinates the South and West Wales region which extends from the Severn estuary to Aberystwyth. Liz Morris coordinates the North Wales region which extends from Aberystwyth to the Dee. The two coordinators are assisted by a number of active Seasearch Tutors, Assistant Tutors and Dive Organisers. Overall guidance and support is provided by the National Seasearch Coordinator, Chris Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Trivialnamen Für Mollusken Des Meeres Und Brackwassers in Deutschland (Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Scaphopoda Et Cephalopoda)
    > Mollusca 27 (1) 2009 3 3 – 32 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1864-5127, 15.04.2009 Trivialnamen für Mollusken des Meeres und Brackwassers in Deutschland (Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Scaphopoda et Cephalopoda) FRITZ GOSSELCK 1, ALEXANDER DARR 1, JÜRGEN H. JUNGBLUTH 2 & MICHAEL L. ZETTLER 3 1 Institut für Angewandte Ökologie GmbH, Alte Dorfstraße 11, D-18184 Broderstorf, Germany [email protected] 2 In der Aue 30e, D-69118 Schlierbach, Germany PROJEKTGRUPPE MOLLUSKENKARTIERUNG © [email protected] 3 Leibniz-Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde, Seestraße 15, D-18119 Rostock, Germany [email protected] Received on July 11, 2008, accepted on February 10, 2009. Published online at www.mollusca-journal.de > Abstract German common names for marine and brackish water molluscs. – A list of common names of German marine and brackish water molluscs was compiled for the German coastal waters and the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the North and Baltic Seas. Main aim of this compilation is to give interested non-professionals better access to and understanding of sea shells and squids. As often long-lived and relatively stationary species, molluscs can provide a key function as water quality indicators. The taxonomic classifi cation was based on the Mollusca databases CLEMAM and ERMS (MARBEF). The list includes 309 species. > Kurzfassung Eine Liste deutscher Namen der marinen und Brackwasser-Mollusken der deutschen Küstengewässer und der Ausschließlichen Wirtschaftszone (AWZ) der Nord- und Ostsee wurde erstellt. Ziel der Zusammenstellung ist es, mit den Trivialnamen dem interessierten Laien die marinen Schnecken, Muscheln und Tintenfi sche etwas näher zu bringen.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusc Fauna of Iskenderun Bay with a Checklist of the Region
    www.trjfas.org ISSN 1303-2712 Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 12: 171-184 (2012) DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v12_1_20 SHORT PAPER Mollusc Fauna of Iskenderun Bay with a Checklist of the Region Banu Bitlis Bakır1, Bilal Öztürk1*, Alper Doğan1, Mesut Önen1 1 Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Hydrobiology Bornova, Izmir. * Corresponding Author: Tel.: +90. 232 3115215; Fax: +90. 232 3883685 Received 27 June 2011 E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 13 December 2011 Abstract This study was performed to determine the molluscs distributed in Iskenderun Bay (Levantine Sea). For this purpose, the material collected from the area between the years 2005 and 2009, within the framework of different projects, was investigated. The investigation of the material taken from various biotopes ranging at depths between 0 and 100 m resulted in identification of 286 mollusc species and 27542 specimens belonging to them. Among the encountered species, Vitreolina cf. perminima (Jeffreys, 1883) is new record for the Turkish molluscan fauna and 18 species are being new records for the Turkish Levantine coast. A checklist of Iskenderun mollusc fauna is given based on the present study and the studies carried out beforehand, and a total of 424 moluscan species are known to be distributed in Iskenderun Bay. Keywords: Levantine Sea, Iskenderun Bay, Turkish coast, Mollusca, Checklist İskenderun Körfezi’nin Mollusca Faunası ve Bölgenin Tür Listesi Özet Bu çalışma İskenderun Körfezi (Levanten Denizi)’nde dağılım gösteren Mollusca türlerini tespit etmek için gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla, 2005 ve 2009 yılları arasında sürdürülen değişik proje çalışmaları kapsamında bölgeden elde edilen materyal incelenmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Systematic Distribution of Mollusca in the British Museum
    PRESENTED ^l)c trustee*. THE BRITISH MUSEUM. California Swcademu 01 \scienceb RECEIVED BY GIFT FROM -fitoZa£du^4S*&22& fo<?as7u> #yjy GUIDE TO THK SYSTEMATIC DISTRIBUTION OK MOLLUSCA IN III K BRITISH MUSEUM PART I HY JOHN EDWARD GRAY, PHD., F.R.S., P.L.S., P.Z.S. Ac. LONDON: PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES 1857. PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. PREFACE The object of the present Work is to explain the manner in which the Collection of Mollusca and their shells is arranged in the British Museum, and especially to give a short account of the chief characters, derived from the animals, by which they are dis- tributed, and which it is impossible to exhibit in the Collection. The figures referred to after the names of the species, under the genera, are those given in " The Figures of Molluscous Animals, for the Use of Students, by Maria Emma Gray, 3 vols. 8vo, 1850 to 1854 ;" or when the species has been figured since the appear- ance of that work, in the original authority quoted. The concluding Part is in hand, and it is hoped will shortly appear. JOHN EDWARD GRAY. Dec. 10, 1856. ERRATA AND CORRIGENDA. Page 43. Verenad.e.—This family is to be erased, as the animal is like Tricho- tropis. I was misled by the incorrectness of the description and figure. Page 63. Tylodinad^e.— This family is to be removed to PleurobrancMata at page 203 ; a specimen of the animal and shell having since come into my possession.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaderno 26.Pmd
    Quaderno di Studi e Notizie di Storia Naturale della Romagna Quad. Studi Nat. Romagna, 26: 1-80 giugno 2008 ISSN 1123-6787 Cesare Tabanelli ASSOCIAZIONI DI PALEOCOMUNITÁ BATIALI A MOLLUSCHI BENTONICI NEL PLIOCENE DELLA ROMAGNA Metodologie ed indicazioni per nuove tematiche Riassunto L’autore analizza l’importanza che i fattori temperatura e batimetria hanno sulla distribuzione del bentos marino. Esamina poi i riferimenti bibliografici secondo i quali durante il Pliocene il Mare Mediterraneo era contrassegnato da una circolazione delle acque di tipo oceanico. Stando a questo modello erano presenti due corpi d’acqua aventi peculiarità termiche diverse: uno superiore di acque temperate calde (termosfera) ed uno inferiore di acque profonde fredde (psicrosfera). Conseguentemente essi dovevano essere separati da una zona di transizione (termoclino). Attualmente in Mediterraneo vige invece uno stato di omotermia calda. L’autore propone quindi di inquadrare le paleocomunità a molluschi bentonici relative al piano batiale, in tre diversi tipi di associazioni così denominate: - Associazione delle Paleocomunità soggette all’influenza della Termosfera (A.P.T.). - Associazione delle Paleocomunità soggette all’influenza della Psicrosfera (A.P.P.). - Associazione delle Paleocomunità Interposte (A.P.I.), ubicate nella zona del termoclino. Le prime due associazioni sono soprannominate “primarie” e le relative specie, sulla base dei dati riscontrati in campagna e desunti dalla bibliografia, vengono distinte in “esclusive” e “preferenziali”. Con il termine “abituali” sono state invece indicate quelle specie euriterme capaci di adattarsi sia sui fondali sottoposti all’influenza della termosfera che della psicrosfera. Questa suddivisione in categorie ha condotto alla realizzazione della tabella 1. Questa tiene conto solo delle specie ritrovate nei depositi profondi della successione romagnola e conseguentemente fa riferimento anche a dati inediti.
    [Show full text]