Comparative Root and Stem Anatomy of Four Rare Onobrychis Mill
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S. -
Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem
Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem JOACHIM W. KADEREIT1*, DIRK C. ALBACH2, FRIEDRICH EHRENDORFER3, MERCÈ GALBANY-CASALS4, NÚRIA GARCIA-JACAS5, BERIT GEHRKE1, GUDRUN KADEREIT6,1, NORBERT KILIAN7, JOHANNES T. KLEIN1, MARCUS A. KOCH8, MATTHIAS KROPF9, CHRISTOPH OBERPRIELER10, MICHAEL D. PIRIE1,11, CHRISTIANE M. RITZ12, MARTIN RÖSER13, KRZYSZTOF SPALIK14, ALFONSO SUSANNA5, MAXIMILIAN WEIGEND15, ERIK WELK16, KARSTEN WESCHE12,17, LI-BING ZHANG18 & MARKUS S. DILLENBERGER1 Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? Version of record irst published online on 24 March 2016 ahead of inclusion in April 2016 issue. Abstract: The use of DNA sequence data in plant systematics has brought us closer than ever to formulating well- founded hypotheses about phylogenetic relationships, and phylogenetic research keeps on revealing that plant genera as traditionally circumscribed often are not monophyletic. Here, we assess the monophyly of all genera of vascular plants found in Germany. Using a survey of the phylogenetic literature, we discuss which classiications would be consistent with the phylogenetic relationships found and could be followed, provided monophyly is accepted as the primary criterion for circumscribing taxa. We indicate whether and which names are available when changes in ge- neric assignment are made (but do not present a comprehensive review of the nomenclatural aspects of such names). Among the 840 genera examined, we identiied c. 140 where data quality is suiciently high to conclude that they are not monophyletic, and an additional c. 20 where monophyly is questionable but where data quality is not yet suicient to reach convincing conclusions. While it is still iercely debated how a phylogenetic tree should be trans- lated into a classiication, our results could serve as a guide to the likely consequences of systematic research for the taxonomy of the German lora and the loras of neighbouring countries. -
A New Subfamily Classification of The
LPWG Phylogeny and classification of the Leguminosae TAXON 66 (1) • February 2017: 44–77 A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) Recommended citation: LPWG (2017) This paper is a product of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group, who discussed, debated and agreed on the classification of the Leguminosae presented here, and are listed in alphabetical order. The text, keys and descriptions were written and compiled by a subset of authors indicated by §. Newly generated matK sequences were provided by a subset of authors indicated by *. All listed authors commented on and approved the final manuscript. Nasim Azani,1 Marielle Babineau,2* C. Donovan Bailey,3* Hannah Banks,4 Ariane R. Barbosa,5* Rafael Barbosa Pinto,6* James S. Boatwright,7* Leonardo M. Borges,8* Gillian K. Brown,9* Anne Bruneau,2§* Elisa Candido,6* Domingos Cardoso,10§* Kuo-Fang Chung,11* Ruth P. Clark,4 Adilva de S. Conceição,12* Michael Crisp,13* Paloma Cubas,14* Alfonso Delgado-Salinas,15 Kyle G. Dexter,16* Jeff J. Doyle,17 Jérôme Duminil,18* Ashley N. Egan,19* Manuel de la Estrella,4§* Marcus J. Falcão,20 Dmitry A. Filatov,21* Ana Paula Fortuna-Perez,22* Renée H. Fortunato,23 Edeline Gagnon,2* Peter Gasson,4 Juliana Gastaldello Rando,24* Ana Maria Goulart de Azevedo Tozzi,6 Bee Gunn,13* David Harris,25 Elspeth Haston,25 Julie A. Hawkins,26* Patrick S. Herendeen,27§ Colin E. Hughes,28§* João R.V. Iganci,29* Firouzeh Javadi,30* Sheku Alfred Kanu,31 Shahrokh Kazempour-Osaloo,32* Geoffrey C. -
Endemism in Mainland Regions – Case Studies
Chapter 7 Endemism in Mainland Regions – Case Studies Sula E. Vanderplank, Andres´ Moreira-Munoz,˜ Carsten Hobohm, Gerhard Pils, Jalil Noroozi, V. Ralph Clark, Nigel P. Barker, Wenjing Yang, Jihong Huang, Keping Ma, Cindy Q. Tang, Marinus J.A. Werger, Masahiko Ohsawa, and Yongchuan Yang 7.1 Endemism in an Ecotone: From Chaparral to Desert in Baja California, Mexico Sula E. Vanderplank () Department of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA e-mail: [email protected] S.E. Vanderplank () Department of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA e-mail: [email protected] A. Moreira-Munoz˜ () Instituto de Geograf´ıa, Pontificia Universidad Catolica´ de Chile, Santiago, Chile e-mail: [email protected] C. Hobohm () Ecology and Environmental Education Working Group, Interdisciplinary Institute of Environmental, Social and Human Studies, University of Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany e-mail: hobohm@uni-flensburg.de G. Pils () HAK Spittal/Drau, Karnten,¨ Austria e-mail: [email protected] J. Noroozi () Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty Centre of Biodiversity, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Plant Science Department, University of Tabriz, 51666 Tabriz, Iran e-mail: [email protected] V.R. Clark • N.P. Barker () Department of Botany, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa e-mail: [email protected] C. Hobohm (ed.), Endemism in Vascular Plants, Plant and Vegetation 9, 205 DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6913-7 7, © Springer -
Evidence from Phylogenetic Analyses Based on Five Nuclear and Five Plastid Sequences
RESEARCH ARTICLE Hedysarum L. (Fabaceae: Hedysareae) Is Not Monophyletic ± Evidence from Phylogenetic Analyses Based on Five Nuclear and Five Plastid Sequences Pei-Liang Liu1, Jun Wen2*, Lei Duan3, Emine Arslan4, Kuddisi Ertuğrul4, Zhao- Yang Chang1* a1111111111 1 College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 2 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., United States of America, a1111111111 3 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical a1111111111 Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 4 Department of Biology, Faculty a1111111111 of Science, SelcËuk University, Konya, Turkey a1111111111 * [email protected] (ZYC); [email protected] (JW) Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Liu P-L, Wen J, Duan L, Arslan E, Ertuğrul The legume family (Fabaceae) exhibits a high level of species diversity and evolutionary K, Chang Z-Y (2017) Hedysarum L. (Fabaceae: success worldwide. Previous phylogenetic studies of the genus Hedysarum L. (Fabaceae: Hedysareae) Is Not Monophyletic ± Evidence from Hedysareae) showed that the nuclear and the plastid topologies might be incongruent, and Phylogenetic Analyses Based on Five Nuclear and the systematic position of the Hedysarum sect. Stracheya clade was uncertain. In this Five Plastid Sequences. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170596 study, phylogenetic relationships of Hedysarum were investigated based on the nuclear ITS, ETS, PGDH, SQD1, TRPT and the plastid psbA-trnH, trnC-petN, trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG, Editor: Shilin Chen, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, petN-psbM sequences. Both nuclear and plastid data support two major lineages in Hedy- CHINA sarum: the Hedysarum s.s. -
Legume Phylogeny and Classification in the 21St Century: Progress, Prospects and Lessons for Other Species-Rich Clades
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades Legume Phylogeny Working Group ; Bruneau, Anne ; Doyle, Jeff J ; Herendeen, Patrick ; Hughes, Colin E ; Kenicer, Greg ; Lewis, Gwilym ; Mackinder, Barbara ; Pennington, R Toby ; Sanderson, Michael J ; Wojciechowski, Martin F ; Koenen, Erik Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-78167 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Legume Phylogeny Working Group; Bruneau, Anne; Doyle, Jeff J; Herendeen, Patrick; Hughes, Colin E; Kenicer, Greg; Lewis, Gwilym; Mackinder, Barbara; Pennington, R Toby; Sanderson, Michael J; Wojciechowski, Martin F; Koenen, Erik (2013). Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon, 62(2):217-248. TAXON 62 (2) • April 2013: 217–248 LPWG • Legume phylogeny and classification REVIEWS Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: Progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades The Legume Phylogeny Working Group1 This paper was compiled by Anne Bruneau,2 Jeff J. Doyle,3 Patrick Herendeen,4 Colin Hughes,5 Greg Kenicer,6 Gwilym Lewis,7 Barbara Mackinder,6,7 R. Toby Pennington,6 Michael J. Sanderson8 and Martin F. Wojciechowski9 who were equally responsible and listed here in alphabetical order only, with contributions from Stephen Boatwright,10 Gillian Brown,11 Domingos Cardoso,12 Michael Crisp,13 Ashley Egan,14 Renée H. Fortunato,15 Julie Hawkins,16 Tadashi Kajita,17 Bente Klitgaard,7 Erik Koenen,5 Matt Lavin18, Melissa Luckow,3 Brigitte Marazzi,8 Michelle M. -
T.C. Selçuk Ünġversġtesġ Fen Bġlġmlerġ Enstġtüsü
T.C. SELÇUK ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ FEN BĠLĠMLERĠ ENSTĠTÜSÜ GLYCYRRHIZA ICONICA HUB.-MOR. ve SARTORIA HEDYSAROIDES BOISS. & HELDR. (FABACEAE) ÜZERĠNE MORFOLOJĠK ve ANATOMĠK BĠR ÇALIġMA Veli ĠLHAN YÜKSEK LĠSANS TEZĠ Biyoloji Anabilim Dalını Ay-2012 KONYA Her Hakkı Saklıdır iv ÖZET YÜKSEK LĠSANS GLYCYRRHIZA ICONICA HUB.-MOR. ve SARTORIA HEDYSAROIDES BOISS. & HELDR. (FABACEAE) ÜZERĠNE MORFOLOJĠK VE ANATOMĠK BĠR ÇALIġMA Veli ĠLHAN Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı DanıĢmanlar: Prof. Dr. Hüseyin DURAL Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet TEMEL 2012, x+84 Sayfa Jüri DanıĢmanın Prof. Dr. Hüseyin DURAL Prof. Dr. Kuddisi ERTUĞRUL Doç. Dr. Mustafa KARGIOĞLU Bu çalıĢmada Fabaceae familyasına ait ve ülkemiz için endemik olan Sartoria hedysaroides Boiss & Heldr. ve Glycyrrhiza iconica Hub.- Mor. türlerinin kök, gövde, rizom ve yapraklarına ait anatomik yapıları ile morfolojik özellikleri ortaya konmuĢtur. Ülkemizde yetiĢen Glycyrrhiza türlerinden Glycyrrhiza iconica hariç diğerlerinin gerek anatomik gerekse morfolojik özellikleri daha önce ortaya konmuĢtur. Glycyrrhiza iconica‟nın özellikle anatomik sonuçları daha önce yapılan bu çalıĢma sonuçları ile karĢılaĢtırılmıĢtır. Morfolojik olarak kök, gövde ve rizom boyutları bakımından diğer Glycyrrhiza taksonlarından oldukça küçük yapıda olduğu tespit edilmiĢtir. Sartoria hedysaroides monotipik bir cinsin türüdür. Bu tür Konya‟da iki farklı lokaliteden toplandı. Rakım olarak yüksek yerden toplanan örnekler kısa boylu (procumbens), rakım olarak düĢük yerden toplanan örnekler ise uzun boylu (ascendens) -
Microsoft Word
Subfamily Faboideae Scientific Classification Kingdom: Plantae Subkingdom: Tracheobionta (Vascular plants/Piante vascolari) Superdivision: Spermatophyta (Seed plants/Piante con semi) Division: Magnoliophyta (Flowering plants/Piante con fiori) Class: Rosopsida Batsch, 1788 Subclass: Rosidae Takht., 1967 SuperOrder: Fabanae R. Dahlgren ex Reveal, 1993 Order: Fabales Family: Fabaceae o Papilionacee Subfamily: Faboideae o Papilionoideae Faboideae is a subfamily of the flowering plant family Fabaceae . An acceptable alternative name for the subfamily is Papilionoideae . This subfamily is widely distributed and members are adapted to a wide variety of environments. Faboideae may be trees, shrubs or herbs. The flowers are classically pea shaped and root nodulation is very common. Flowers: Zygomorphic, papilionaceous; hypan-thium present; petals 5 [1 banner or standard petal outermost, 2 free lateral wing petals, and 2 petals fused to form the keel]; stamens 10, usually diadelphous (9 connate, 1 free), sometimes monadelphous or all free Inflorescences: Racemes, spikes, or heads Fruits: Diverse legumes Seeds: Without endosperm; lacking pleurogram Habit: Mostly herbs, some trees and shrubs; temperate, subtropical, and tropical Leaves: Usually pinnately compound, sometimes palmately compound, rarely simple, alternate, with stipules The belonging genera to the Faboideae family are: • Abrus • Craspedolobium • Kummerowia • Podalyria • Acosmium • Cratylia • Lablab • Podocytisus • Adenocarpus • Crotalaria • Laburnum • Poecilanthe • Adenodolichos • Cruddasia -
Multiple Facets of Biodiversity: Assembly Processes, Trait Composition, and Functionality Along Tropical Elevation Gradients
Multiple facets of biodiversity: Assembly processes, trait composition, and functionality along tropical elevation gradients Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer.nat.) dem Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg vorgelegt von Yvonne Christin Tiede aus Gifhorn Marburg an der Lahn, Oktober 2017 Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg als Dissertation am 21.11.2017 angenommen. Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Nina Farwig Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Roland Brandl Tag der mündlichen Prüfung am: 07.12.2017 Land of the Sun! Where joyous green-robes Spring And leaf-crowned Summer deck the Earth for ever; No Winter stern their sweet embrace to sever And numb to silence every living thing, But bird and insect ever on the wing, Flitting ‚mid forest glades and tangled bowers, While the life-giving orb’s effulgent beams Through all the circling year call forth the flowers. Here graceful palms, here luscious fruits have birth; The fragrant coffee, life-sustaining rice, Sweet canes, and wondrous gums, and odorous spice; While Flora`s choicest treasures crowd the teeming earth. Beside each cot the golden Orange stands, And broad-leaved Plantain, pride of Tropic lands. Alfred R. Wallace Table of contents Table of contents Chapter 1 General introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Biodiversity as the backbone of functioning ecosystems .......................................................................... -
Tribe Cicereae
Tribe Cicereae Scientific Classification Kingdom: Plantae Subkingdom: Tracheobionta (Vascular plants) Superdivision: Spermatophyta (Seed plants) Division: Magnoliophyta (Flowering plants) Class: Rosopsida Batsch, 1788 Subclass: Rosidae Takht., 1967 SuperOrder: Fabanae R. Dahlgren ex Reveal, 1993 Order: Fabales Family: Fabaceae o Papilionacee Subfamily: Faboideae o Papilionoideae Tribe: Cicereae Aleféld. Fruit a legume; unilocular; 1.8–3.6; 0.7–2 cm; with deciduous calyx; without orifice formed by curving of fruit or fruit segments; straight; not plicate; not twisted; symmetrical; elliptic to oblong to obovate to rhombic (elongate); not inflated; terete; without beak; short tapered at apex; apex aligned with longitudinal axis of fruit; short tapered at base; base aligned with longitudinal axis of fruit; with the apex and base uniform in texture; membranous; seed chambers externally invisible. Fruit margin not constricted; without sulcus; plain. Fruit wings absent. Fruit nonstipitate. Fruit with all layers dehiscing; splitting along sutures. Dehiscence of valves along both sutures; apical and down; active or passive; with valves twisting. Replum invisible. Epicarp dull; monochrome; brown or yellow (-brown); glabrous or pubescent and indurate; with 1 type of pubescence; pilose; with pubescence gray; with pubescence uniformly distributed; with simple hairs; pliable; with hair bases plain; glandular or eglandular; with glandular hairs; without spines; not smooth; with elevated features; obliquely veined relative to fruit length; not tuberculate; not exfoliating; without cracks. Mesocarp thin; 1-layered; without balsamic vesicles; without fibers; solid; coriaceous. Endocarp glossy; monochrome; tan; smooth; nonseptate; chartaceous; not exfoliating; remaining fused to mesocarp and epicarp; entire. Seeds 1–2(–7); touching, or neither overlapping nor touching; in 1 series. -
Character List
Character List #1. Subfamily:/ 1. Caesalpinioideae/ 2. Mimosoideae/ 3. Faboideae/ #2. Phylogenetic number:/ #3. Tribe: <of Caesalpinioideae>/ 1. Caesalpinieae/ 2. Cassieae/ 3. Cercideae/ 4. Detarieae/ 5. Amherstieae/ #4. Tribe: <of Mimosoideae>/ 1. Parkieae/ 2. Mimozygantheae/ 3. Mimoseae/ 4. Acacieae/ 5. Ingeae/ #5. Tribe: <of Faboideae>/ 1. Swartzieae/ 2. Sophoreae/ 3. Dipteryxeae/ 4. Dalbergieae/ 5. Abreae/ 6. Amorpheae/ 7. Millettieae/ 8. Robinieae <including Sesbanieae>/ 9. Indigofereae/ 10. Phaseoleae/ 11. Desmodieae/ 12. Psoraleeae/ 13. Loteae/ 14. Aeschynomeneae/ 15. Adesmieae/ 16. Galegeae/ 17. Carmichaelieae/ 18. Hedysareae/ 19. Fabeae/ 20. Cicereae/ 21. Trifolieae/ 22. Brongniartieae/ 23. Bossiaeeae/ 24. Mirbelieae/ 25. Podalyrieae/ 26. Hypocalypteae/ 27. Crotalarieae/ 28. Euchresteae/ 29. Thermopsideae/ 30. Genisteae/ #6. Subtribe:/ #7. Group:/ 1130 #8. Species: <studied>/ studied/ #9. Species: <in genus>/ in genus/ FRUIT CHARACTERS #10. Fruit <recording of morphology>/ 1. internal and external morphology recorded/ 2. external morphology only recorded/ 3. internal morphology only recorded/ 4. morphology not recorded/ #11. Fruit a <type>/ 1. legume <including dehiscent and indehiscent 1-seeded fruits>/ 2. loment (or a loment segment) <multiseeded, breaking into 1-seeded, usually indehiscent, segments SEE loment characters further back>/ 3. nutlet <SEE nutlet characters further back>/ #12. Fruit <number of locules in legume, 1 or 2>/ 1. unilocular/ 2. bilocular/ #13. Fruit <length, from apex to base of fruit>/ cm long/ #14. Fruit <width, before dehiscence, at widest part>/ cm wide/ #15. Fruit <thickness, before dehiscence, at thickest part>/cm thick/ #16. Fruit <relationship of length to width>/ 1. length less than twice as long as width/ 2. 2-9 times longer than wide/ 3. more than 9 times longer than wide/ 4.