TJS Kazbegi Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TJS Kazbegi Assessment Report Transboundary Joint Secretariat for the Southern Caucasus Promoting cooperation in nature conservation Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the KfW Entwicklungsbank of Germany or of the Agency of Protected Areas of Georgia. These opinions are based on observations by the authors and on information obtained from the quoted documents and as provided by stakeholders that were interviewed during the mission. The derived conclusions and recommendations are particularly formulated for the purpose and objectives of this assessment. TJS disclaims all liability to any third party who may place reliance on this report. - i - Impact Assessment of Investments on Assessment Report Kazbegi National Park Development November 2012 Disclaimer: Table of Contents A. Executive Summary................................................................................................... 1 B. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 B.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 7 B.2 The Objectives and Scope of the Assignment........................................................ 9 C. Methodology............................................................................................................ 10 D. Results of the Mission ............................................................................................. 11 D.1 Dariali Hydropower Project (DHPP) ..................................................................... 11 D.1.1 Present Situation.......................................................................................... 11 D.1.2 Findings from Meetings and Interviews ........................................................ 17 D.1.3 Potential Environmental Impacts and Risks ................................................. 19 D.1.4 Mitigation Measures and Monitoring............................................................. 20 D.2 Larsi Hydropower Plant ....................................................................................... 21 D.2.1 Present Situation.......................................................................................... 21 D.2.2 Larsi Impacts and Mitigation ........................................................................ 21 D.3 Khadistskali (/Kazbegi) Hydropower Plant ........................................................... 21 D.3.1 Present Situation.......................................................................................... 21 D.3.2 Khadistskali Impact and Mitigation ............................................................... 22 D.4 National Park Forest Land near Stepantsminda Proposal for Hotel Use .............. 22 D.4.1 Findings from Meetings and Documents ...................................................... 22 D.4.2 The Present Situation .................................................................................. 23 D.4.3 Impacts and Risks........................................................................................ 23 D.4.4 Recommendations....................................................................................... 25 D.5 Natural Monuments as Compensation Areas....................................................... 25 D.5.1 Present Situation.......................................................................................... 25 D.5.2 Environmental Impacts................................................................................. 26 E. Impact on the Overall Objectives of German Financial Cooperation ........................ 28 F. Conclusions and Recommendations on Impact on Biodiversity Conservation.............. 29 F.1 Conclusions and Recommendations for Hotel Rooms Plans ............................... 30 List of Annexes Annex 1. Terms of Reference 32 Annex 2. Impact of investments on the LogFrame of the SPPA 36 Annex 3. Mitigation Implementation Plan 39 Annex 4. Relevant Regulations Establishing Kazbegi National Park 41 Annex 5. Itinerary 45 Annex 6. Persons Met 46 Annex 7. Work Plan 48 Annex 8. Document References 49 Annex 9. Debriefing Presentation (29 October in Tbilisi and 31 October in Frankfurt) 50 List of Figures Figure 1. Run-of-River Option for Dariali HPP 13 Figure 2. Proposed Project Headwork Infrastructure 14 Figure 3. Project Tunnel and Construction Activity 15 Figure 4. Main Tergi Gorge (view to south with Stepantsminda at the end) 16 - ii - Impact Assessment of Investments on Assessment Report Kazbegi National Park Development November 2012 Figure 5. Water Flows in Tergi River with and without Dariali Project 16 Figure 6. Larsi Headworks under construction 21 Figure 7. Khadistskali River and Power Station 22 Figure 8. Photos of Stepantsminda National Park forest area and Rooms Hotel 24 Figure 9. Truso Travertines and Abano Mineral Lake 25 Figure 10. Sakhazinari Cliff Columns 26 List of Maps Map 1. Areas set aside for DHPP, other HPP locations, area considered by Rooms and mitigation areas added to the Kazbegi National Park 2 Map 2. Land Excluded from the National Park for DHPP and Required by Rooms Hotel 12 Map 3. Location of Rooms Hotel, Stepantsminda KNP Forest Area and Monastery land 24 List of Tables Table 1. Impact Assessment of DHHP and Private Development Stepantsminda Forest NR against Objectives & Outputs of German Financial Cooperation 5 Table 2. Impact Assessment of DHHP and Private Development Stepantsminda Forest KNP against Objectives & Outputs of the Support Programme for Protected Areas 28 ABBREVIATIONS APA Agency for Protected Areas BMZ German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation & Development CO2 Carbon Dioxide EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan ENP Ecoregional Nature Protection Programme ha hectare IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KfW KfW Entwicklungsbank - German Bank for Reconstruction and Development km kilometre km2 Square kilometre kW kilowatt KNP Kazbegi National Park DHPP Dariali Hydropower Plant HPP Hydropower Plant l litre m3/s cubic meters per second masl metres above sea level MoEP Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources MW Mega Watt NGO Non Governmental Organisation PA Protected Area SPPA Support Programme for Protected Areas TJS Transboundary Joint Secretariat US$ US Dollar WWF World Wide Fund for Nature - iii - Impact Assessment of Investments on Assessment Report Kazbegi National Park Development November 2012 A. Executive Summary Background The German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) supports economic, social and political development in the South Caucasus through the “Caucasus Initiative”. A significant part of BMZ’s Caucasus Initiative is the Ecoregional Nature Protection Programme (ENP) for the Southern Caucasus. Under the ENP BMZ finances through KfW three Financial Cooperation (FC) components: i) support programme for individual protected areas, ii) contributions to the Caucasus Nature Fund and iii) running of a “Transboundary Joint Secretariat” (TJS) for Nature Conservation in the Southern Caucasus. The FC financed Support Programme to Protected Areas (SPPA) aims to improve the management of natural resources and protected areas, and simultaneously improve living conditions of the adjacent communities. The activities are to be based on participatory approaches for management planning, biodiversity and nature conservation, and for socio- economic development. Financing and Separate Agreement for the SPPA is to be concluded with the Government of Georgia for implementing this programme. The Kazbegi National Park (KNP) will be one of the target Protected Areas, where boundaries will be redesigned for more effective biodiversity conservation, along with capacity building, preparing a management plan and socio-economic development activities. In 2011 the Government of Georgia singed an agreement with Dariali Energy Company to construct the new Dariali Hydro Power Plant (DHPP). The DHPP is being constructed at a site partially within and for other parts immediately adjacent to the Kazbegi National Park (KNP), north of Stepantsminda town. As construction activities are not allowed in protected areas, 20 ha of protected area was removed from the KNP. As compensation 339 ha of land have been added to the KNP. Early September 2012 it became known that an additional 47 ha is proposed to be removed from KNP for use by a new hotel. The removal of these areas and possible impact on biodiversity conservation has raised concerns on possible risks for achieving the SPPA objectives for the expanded KNP under the SPPA. KfW expressed these concerns to the Agency for Protected Areas (APA)1. Consequently, following consultations, APA requested that TJS employ the services of an international and a national environmental expert to assess the impacts of these developments on the KNP SPPA project. The Objectives and Scope of the Impact Assessment Assignment The assignment was to assess the impact to the two areas of KNP affected (20ha for DHHP and 47ha for the Hotel site see Map 1) and to comment on the addition of the natural monument compensation areas on: • the biodiversity conservation and nature protection objectives in the KNP project area (as described in the feasibility study), and • on the objectives of the Protected Area development support provided by German Development cooperation within the context of the SPPA. 1 )
Recommended publications
  • Spatial Analysis Used in Baseline Study for the Preparation of Management Plan of Kazbegi Protected Areas
    Earth Sciences 2017; 6(5-1): 93-110 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/earth doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2017060501.24 ISSN: 2328-5974 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5982 (Online) Spatial Analysis Used in Baseline Study for the Preparation of Management Plan of Kazbegi Protected Areas Tamar Bakuradze1, *, Andrei Kandaurov2, *, Marine Mosulishvili3, *, Dali Nikolaishvili4, *, Mamuka Gvilava1, *, Sophiko Kenkebashvili1, * 1GIS and Remote Sensing Consulting Center “GeoGraphic”, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 3Institute of Botanic, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 4Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University (TSU), Tbilisi, Georgia Email address: [email protected] (T. Bakuradze), [email protected] (A. Kandaurov), [email protected] (M. Mosulishvili), [email protected] (D. Nikolaishvili), [email protected] (M. Gvilava), [email protected] (S. Kenkebashvili) *Corresponding author To cite this article: Tamar Bakuradze, Andrei Kandaurov, Marine Mosulishvili, Dali Nikolaishvili, Mamuka Gvilava, Sophiko Kenkebashvili. Spatial Analysis Used in Baseline Study for the Preparation of Management Plan of Kazbegi Protected Areas. Earth Sciences. Special Issue: New Challenge for Geography: Landscape Dimensions of Sustainable Development. Vol. 6, No. 5-1, 2017, pp. 93-110. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2017060501.24 Received: August 4, 2017; Accepted: August 7, 2017; Published: August 23, 2017 Abstract: Collected data were separated in three generalized subsystem: environment (its main elements: air, land and water) as an Abiotic subsystems; flora and fauna, as the elements of a Biotic subsystem and Cultural environment, as a third subsystem, with its historical-cultural heritage and existing infrastructure. Interpretation and evaluation of the data were made for each component (Abiotic, Biotic and Cultural) through the use of criteria of significance and description of constraints (limiting factors) which were elaborated under the project SPPA/CS/2015-5/RE1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazbegi Project ANNEX of the DRAFT FINAL REPORT Feasibility Study
    GEORGIA Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources (MEPNR) Agency for Protected Areas (APA) Ecoregional Programme III (Georgia), Kazbegi Project ANNEX of the DRAFT FINAL REPORT Feasibility Study for the Ecoregional Programme III (Georgia), Kazbegi Project ANNEX German Financial Cooperation with Georgia 1 April 2010 Deutsche Forstservice GmbH AGEG Consultants eG GEO - ERP III Draft Final Report Feasibility Study Kazbegi 1 LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1 Situation Analysis Annex 1.1: List of Contacts Annex 1.2: Biophysical Framework Annex 1.3: List of Plant Species Annex 1.4: List of Vertebrates of Kazbegi District (excl. birds) Annex 1.5: List of Birds Annex 1.6: List of Mammals of Kazbegi Region Annex 1.7: List of Endangered Species Annex 1.8: Summary List of Village Profiles Annex 1.9: Report on the Tourism Sector of the Kazbegi Region Annex 1.10: Waste Management State and Environmental Pollution Annex 1.11: Legal Framework Analysis Biosphere Reserve Annex 1.12: Stakeholder Analysis Annex 2 Options for Meeting Goals and Objectives Annex 2.1: Decision Support Tool Discussion Biosphere Reserve vs. National Park and Support Zone Annex 3 Proposed Project Area and Zoning Annex 3.1: Gudauri SWOT Analysis Annex 3.2: Setting Site-Based Conservation Priorities Annex 4 Proposed Project Annex 4.1: Logframe Annex 4.2: Midterm Report: Quick-Start Measures and Priority Interventions Annex 4.3: Recommendations on the Waste Management Annex 4.4: Recommendations on the Toursm Sector Development Feasibility Study for the Ecoregional Programme III
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions
    Environmental Impact Assessment December 2018 First Draft GEO: North–South Corridor (Kvesheti-Kobi) Road Project Part 3 (Sections D-E) Prepared by JV Anas International Enterprise S.P.A., Gestione Progetti Ingegneria S.R.L., and IRD Engineering S.R.L. for the Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Environmental Impact Assessment for the Kvesheti-Kobi Road Section D. EnvironMental Laws, Standards and Regulations D.1 Overview 332. This section of the EIA provides a summary of: (i) Environmental Legislation of Georgia; (ii) The Administrative Framework; (iii) Environmental Regulations and Standards of Georgia; (iv) National Technical Regulations Relevant to the Project; (v) Environmental Permitting Procedure; (vi) Permit and Licenses Required for Off-site Works During Construction; (vii) International Conventions Relevant to the Project Ratified by Georgia; (viii) An overview of the ADB and EBRD safeguard policies / performance requirements. D.2 General 333. Georgian legislation comprises the Constitution, environmental laws, international agreements, subordinate legislation, normative acts, presidential orders and governmental decrees, ministerial orders, instructions and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Caucasus Glacier Inventory (Russia/Georgia/Azerbaijan) Levan G
    The Cryosphere Discuss., doi:10.5194/tc-2017-48, 2017 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 3 April 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC-BY 3.0 License. The Greater Caucasus Glacier Inventory (Russia/Georgia/Azerbaijan) Levan G. Tielidze1,3, Roger D. Wheate2 1Department of Geomorphology, Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane, Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, 6 Tamarashvili st., Tbilisi, Georgia, 0177 5 2Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, Canada, V2N 4Z9 3Department of Earth Sciences, Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 52 Rustaveli Ave., Tbilisi, Georgia, 0108 Correspondence to: Levan G. Tielidze ([email protected]) 10 Abstract While there are a large number of glaciers in the Greater Caucasus, the region is not fully represented in modern glacier databases with previous incomplete inventories. Here, we present an expanded glacier inventory for this region over the 1960- 1986-2014 period. Large scale topographic maps and satellite imagery (Landsat 5, Landsat 8 and ASTER) were used to 15 conduct a remote sensing survey of glacier change in the Greater Caucasus mountains. Glacier margins were mapped manually and reveal that, in 1960, the mountains contained 2349 glaciers, with a total glacier surface area of 1674.9±35.2 km2. By 1986, glacier surface area had decreased to 1482.1±32.2 km2 (2209 glaciers), and by 2014, to 1193.2±27.0 km2 (2020 glaciers). This represents a 28.8±2.2% (481±10.6 km2) reduction in total glacier surface area between 1960 and 2014 and a marked acceleration in the rate of area loss since 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruka-Avtobani Da Strategia.Pdf
    saqarTvelos saavtomobilo gzebis qselis ganviTarebis gegma leseliZe gagra Ü bzifi qluxoris uR. - 2616 m. D gudauTa tita lenkvaSi ruseTis federacia nakra sguriSi lawomba caleri tvebiSi mazeri yari Cubari Woxuldi xidas uR. - 2333 m. kacxi fari soxumi dizi zagari zardlaSi Rvebra devra mestia JabeSi qvemo marRi lewferi yvana ebudidoli soli Z JamuSi D yazayi ifxi kalaSisvifi kaeri wvirmi laxami lahili aci qedani xelra zegani tviberilezgara ieli adiSi luxiWeri muxaSera gulrifSi xaiSi usgviri Wale zeda wirmindi viCnaSixe xalde idlianiSgedi lentexi-mestiis damakavSirebeli laskraliagrai ToTani CaJaSi yoruldaSi s/gzis da gvirabis mSenebloba murymeliD Z barjaSi atkveris (zagaris) uR. - 2623 m. zesxo tyvarCeli cana muwditvibi cxumaldi duraSi mami bavari Stvili fanaga mananauri luji Wvelfi xaCeSi fayi macxvarlamezuri benieri xeledi sasaSi lkeaxnutraeyxariiSi xeriamele gona lentexi mebeci Robi focxo-eweri Skedi naka lamanaSuri Rebi olori patara Rebi oCamCire naSamgu Cqvaleri mazaSi muJava xofuri Wiora Wale wiflakakia gveleTi ewerferdi naguru oWane yvedreSi mamisonis uR. - 2829 m. Wvele faxulani kuxeSi lara laRarvaSi glola lia saCino doRuraSi wyouSi jgali naRomari D cdo paluri eweri orbelis uR. - 1000 m. muxuriqoyo zeda luxvano gveso amRa gali tyaia leqarde kurcobi xideSlebi resi tefi stefanwminda miqava qulbaqci ageri uravi stefanwminda axieli Satili Cxoria Taia lajDana uwera sno-juTa-roSka-Satili-omalo- lejolixe zumi Cqumi Ru sakaoborco gimara fanSeti giorgwminda riye walenjixa abari gadamSi cocolTa ToTi WimRa xadori-bawara-axmetas WkaduaSi uluria
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment GEO: North–South Corridor
    Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 51257-001 April 2019 GEO: North–South Corridor (Kvesheti–Kobi) Road Project Part 5 (Section E) Prepared by JV Anas International Enterprise S.P.A., Gestione Progetti Ingegneria S.R.L., and IRD Engineering S.R.L. for the Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Environmental Impact Assessment for the Kvesheti-Kobi Road Section E. Description of the Environment 487. This section of the report discusses the existing environmental and social conditions within the Project area under the following headings: • Physical Resources (air quality, hydrology, topography, etc.); • Ecological Resources (notable habitats, notable species, etc.); • Economic Resources (infrastructure, land use, etc.); • Social and Cultural Resources (health, education, noise, cultural resources, etc.) 488. The methodology for the collection of the baseline data is provided by Appendix H. 489. The potential impacts of the Project on its surrounding physical and biological environments include air and water quality impacts, noise generation, land transformation and changes to soil.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prelude to the Caucasus Barcode of Life Platform (Cabol): Biodiversity Days in Georgia in 2018 and 2019
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 68 (2): 275–296 ISSN 2190–7307 2019 · Thormann J. et al. http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2019.68.2.275 Report** A prelude to the Caucasus Barcode of Life Platform (CaBOL): Biodiversity Days in Georgia in 2018 and 2019 Jana Thormann1, Dirk Ahrens1, Cort Anderson2, Jonas J. Astrin1,*, Levan Mumladze3, Björn Rulik1, David Tarkhnishvili1, Marianne Espeland1, Matthias Geiger1, Nils Hein4, Giorgi Iankoshvili2, Elisabeth Karalashvili2, Ximo Mengual1, Carsten Morkel5, Marco T. Neiber6, Ralph S. Peters1, André Reimann7, Axel Ssymank8, Thomas Wesener1, Joachim Ziegler9 & Bernhard Misof1,* 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Center for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 2 Center of Biodiversity Studies, Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Cholokashvili ave.3/5, GE-0169 Tbilisi, Georgia 3 Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Cholokashvili ave.3/5, GE-0169 Tbilisi, Georgia 4 School of Natural Sciences and Engineering Ilia State University, 3/5 Choloqashvili Ave, GE-Tbilisi 0162, Georgia 5 Institute for Applied Entomology, Bartholomäusstrasse 24, D-37688 Beverungen 6 Centrum für Naturkunde (CeNak) – Center of Natural History, Abteilung Biodiversität der Tiere, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany 7 Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 8 Falkenweg 6, D-53343 Wachtberg 9 Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany * Corresponding authors: Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. Here we report on collaborative expeditions run by ISU (Ilia State University, Tbilisi), ZFMK (Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn) and external taxonomists in Georgia in 2018 and 2019 as part of the rene- wed close cooperation between Germany and Caucasus countries aiming at the exploration of biodiversity in the Caucasus region.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report
    “Darial Energy” LLC Dariali Hydro Power Plant Construction and Operation Project Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report Executors Scientific Research Firm “Gamma" President : V. Gvakharia “Stucky Caucasus“ LLC General Director : B. Quigley 2011 SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FIRM “GAMMA 17a. Guramishvili av, 0192, Tbilisi, Georgia tel: +(995 32) 260 44 33 +(995 32) 260 15 27 e-mail: [email protected] EIA-Dariali_HPP 2 / 205 Table of Content 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................7 1.1 General Overview ...........................................................................................................................................7 1.2 Basis and Goals of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report ...................................................7 2 Legal-institutional framework............................................................................................................8 2.1 Georgian legislation and institutional framework.........................................................................................8 2.1.1 State policy objectives ................................................................................................................................8 2.1.2 Regional and international cooperation ....................................................................................................9 2.1.2.1 Regional cooperation .........................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Sector in Kazbegi Municipality
    The Overview of Kazbegi General Development Potential Baseline study 1st December 2015 (Revised on March 9, 2016) Disclaimer “This publication has been produced with the assistance of the EuropeanUnion. The contents of this publicationare the sole responsibility of GeoWel Research and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union." Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 7 Desciption of Kazbegi municipality ............................................................................................... 8 Demographics and statistical profile of the Kazbegi population ................................................ 10 Kazbegi strategic documents and legislation .............................................................................. 12 Economic activities in Kazbegi .................................................................................................... 13 Government and private services in Kazbegi .............................................................................. 16 Annex 1: Questionnaire of the socio-economic survey of the Kazbegi municipality ................. 20 Annex 2: The number of individuals and households
    [Show full text]
  • Download Map (PDF | 4.04
    South Ossetia & Area Adjacent to South Ossetia GEORGIA: UN Security Phases 26 Jan 2009 K K N U Gveleti N ! U ShoviCHAN Glola ! CH ! AK HI LEGEND Tsdo NARI ! I N O International Boundary I R O U HD NI NK MIK MA Resi ! Setepi ! Kazbegi RUSSIANSOUTH OSSETIA FEDERATION ZAKA Phase VI ! Phase III (Area Adjacent to South Ossetia - AA to SO) TE Pansheti R ! G NK ! I Suatisi U ! Toti ! ! ! 1 x Soft Skin Vehicle Tsotsilta Karatkau ! Achkhoti GaiboteniArsha! ! ! SN O Tkarsheti ST Phase III (Area Adjacent to South Ossetia - AA to SO) ! Mna U ! Garbani S ! ! K A N A GARUL K Sioni L Abano ! I ! 1 x Hard Skin Vehicle ! Sno Pkh!elshe Vardisubani Khurtisi ! ! Ketrisi ! ! Kvadja U ! N Kanobi K ! Shua Kozi Zemo Okrokana ! ! Shua Sba Sevardeni Kvemo Kozi ! ! ! H! City ! Kvemo Okrokana !Kvemo Jomaga Nogkau Zemo Roka ! ! Zemo Jomaga Kvemo Sba ! Shua Roka ! ! Kvedi ! Artkhmo ! Kobi ! Village Cheliata ! ! Almasiani Ukhati ! ! Leti ! ! Zgubiri ! Skhanari Kvemo Roka ! ! Kevselta ! Vezuri ! Road Network ! A Kabuzta OR Edisa ! Khodzi J ! ! ! Tsedisi Tamagini JE ! ! ! Bzita ! Zaseta Kiro!vi ! Nadarbazevi! ! Railway Chasavali Nakreba ! Kvaisi ! Kobeti Akhsagrina ! ! ! Britata Iri ! Sagilzazi ! ! Sheubani ! ! Kvemo Ermani ! Shua Ermani ! PHASE I Non-seasonal river Shembuli ! Zemo Bakarta Khadisari ! ! Batra Martgajina Kvemo Bakarta ! ! Duodonastro ! ! Litsi Lakes Tlia ! Kasagini ! ! Nogkau ! A Zamtareti S Lesora ! Kvemo Machkhara T ! ! A Tlia P ! Tskere Tsarita Palagkau ! ! ! Keshelta !Gudauri Kola ! Bajigata Mugure ! ! ! !Khugata Chagata Shiboita ! Saritata ! ! Kvemo
    [Show full text]
  • DEBRIS FLOWS: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection
    DEBRIS FLOWS: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Tbilisi, Georgia, 1-5 October 2018 Editors S.S. Chernomorets, G.V. Gavardashvili Publishing House “Universal” Tbilisi 2018 СЕЛЕВЫЕ ПОТОКИ: катастрофы, риск, прогноз, защита Труды 5-й Международной конференции Тбилиси, Грузия, 1-5 октября 2018 г. Ответственные редакторы С.С. Черноморец, Г.В. Гавардашвили Издательство Универсал Тбилиси 2018 ღვარცოფები: კატასტროფები, რისკი, პროგნოზი, დაცვა მე–5 საერთაშორისო კონფერენციის მასალები თბილისი, საქართველო, 1–5 ოქტომბერი, 2018 რედაქტორები ს.ს. ჩერნომორეც, გ.ვ. გავარდაშვილი გამომცემლობა "უნივერსალი" თბილისი 2018 УДК 551.311.8 ББК 26.823 Селевые потоки: катастрофы, риск, прогноз, защита. Труды 5-й Международной конференции. Тбилиси, Грузия, 1-5 октября 2018 г. – Отв. ред. С.С. Черноморец, Г.В. Гавардашвили. – Тбилиси: Универсал, 2018, 671 с. Debris Flows: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. Tbilisi, Georgia, 1-5 October 2018. – Ed. by S.S. Chernomorets, G.V. Gavardashvili. – Tbilisi: Publishing House “Universal”, 2018, 671 p. ღვარცოფები: კატასტროფები, რისკი, პროგნოზი, დაცვა. მე–5 საერთაშორისო კონფერენციის მასალები. თბილისი, საქართველო, 1–5 ოქტომბერი, 2018. გამომცემლობა "უნივერსალი", თბილისი 2018, 671 გვ. პასუხისმგებელი რედაქტორები ს.ს. ჩერნომორეც, გ.ვ. გავარდაშვილი. Ответственные редакторы С.С. Черноморец, Г.В. Гавардашвили Edited by S.S. Chernomorets, G.V. Gavardashvili Верстка: С.С. Черноморец, К.С. Висхаджиева, Е.А. Савернюк Page-proofs: S.S. Chernomorets, K.S. Viskhadzhieva, E.A. Savernyuk При создании логотипа конференции использован рисунок из книги С.М. Флейшмана «Селевые потоки» (Москва: Географгиз, 1951, с. 51). Conference logo is based on a figure from S.M. Fleishman’s book on Debris Flows (Moscow: Geografgiz, 1951, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Feasibility Study – Kazbegi Project
    GEORGIA Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources (MEPNR) Agency for Protected Areas (APA) Ecoregional Programme III (Georgia), Kazbegi Project Feasibility Study for the Ecoregional Programme III (Georgia), Kazbegi Project Final REPORT German Financial Cooperation with Georgia March 2010 Deutsche Forstservice GmbH AGEG Consultants eG GEO - ERP Draft Report Feasibility Study Kazbegi i TABLE OF CONTENT Table of Content.............................................................................................................i List of Figures............................................................................................................... iii List of Tables................................................................................................................ iii Abbreviations and Acronyms........................................................................................ iii Contact Persons and Addresses .................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................. iii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................3 1.1 Background...................................................................................................3 1.2 Constraints and Limitations to the Feasibility Study.......................................3 1.3 Methodological Approach..............................................................................3
    [Show full text]