The Flint Water Crisis: a Case Study on Flint, Causes of the City’S Downfall, and the Need for New American Infrastructure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2008 and 2013 Flint River Watershed Biosurvey Monitoring Report
MI/DEQ/WRD-17/009 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION APRIL 2017 STAFF REPORT A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE FLINT RIVER AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES IN GENESEE, LAPEER, OAKLAND, SANILAC, SAGINAW, SHIAWASSEE, AND TUSCOLA COUNTIES JUNE-SEPTEMBER 2008 AND 2013 Qualitative biological sampling of the Flint River watershed was conducted by staff of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Assessment Section (SWAS), from June-September of both 2008 and 2013 as part of a five-year watershed monitoring cycle. The Flint River watershed is a vast watershed that falls within two ecoregions: the Southern Michigan Northern Indiana Till Plain and Huron and Lake Erie Till Plain ecoregions (Omernik and Gallant, 1988). Land use in the Flint River watershed is predominantly agriculture and forested with portions also being urban. The Flint River is a major tributary to the Saginaw River/Bay ecosystem. OBJECTIVES These biological surveys were conducted to: • Assess the current status condition of individual waters to determine attainment of Michigan Water Quality Standards (WQS). • Evaluate potential impacts from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)-regulated sources to water quality in the watersheds. • Identify potential nonpoint sources (NPS) of water quality impairment. • Satisfy monitoring request submitted by internal and external customers. The locations of the surveyed biological stations are illustrated in Figures 1a (2008) and 1b (2013) and Tables 1a (2008) and 1b (2013). For the 2008 data, detailed macroinvertebrate, fish, and habitat sampling results are provided in Tables 2a and 2b, 3a and 3b, and 4, respectively. Water (14 locations) and sediment (2 locations) chemistry samples were collected during the 2008 watershed assessment; locations and results can be found in Tables 5 and 6. -
The Flint Water Crisis, KWA and Strategic-Structural Racism
The Flint Water Crisis, KWA and Strategic-Structural Racism By Peter J. Hammer Professor of Law and Director Damon J. Keith Center for Civil Rights Wayne State University Law School Written Testimony Submitted to the Michigan Civil Rights Commission Hearings on the Flint Water Crisis July 18, 2016 i Table of Contents I Flint, Municipal Distress, Emergency Management and Strategic- Structural Racism ………………………………………………………………... 1 A. What is structural and strategic racism? ..................................................1 B. Knowledge, power, emergency management and race………………….3 C. Flint from a perspective of structural inequality ………………………. 5 D. Municipal distress as evidence of a history of structural racism ………7 E. Emergency management and structural racism………………………... 9 II. KWA, DEQ, Treasury, Emergency Managers and Strategic Racism………… 11 A. The decision to approve Flint’s participation in KWA………………… 13 B Flint’s financing of KWA and the use of the Flint River for drinking water………………………………………………………………………. 22 1. The decision to use the Flint River………………………………. 22 2. Flint’s financing of the $85 million for KWA pipeline construction ..……………………………………………………. 27 III. The Perfect Storm of Strategic and Structural Racism: Conflicts, Complicity, Indifference and the Lack of an Appropriate Political Response……………... 35 A. Flint, Emergency Management and Structural Racism……………….. 35 B. Strategic racism and the failure to respond to the Flint water crisis…. 38 VI Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………….. 45 Appendix: Peter J. Hammer, The Flint Water Crisis: History, Housing and Spatial-Structural Racism, Testimony before Michigan Civil Rights Commission Hearing on Flint Water Crisis (July 14, 2016) ……………………… 46 ii The Flint Water Crisis, KWA and Strategic-Structural Racism By Peter J. Hammer1 Flint is a complicated story where race plays out on multiple dimensions. -
Point Source Water Contamination Module Was Originally Published in 2003 by the Advanced Technology Environmental and Energy Center (ATEEC)
From the POINT SOURCE Technology and Environmental Decision-Making WATER Series CONTAMINATION This 2017 version of the Point Source Water Contamination module was originally published in 2003 by the Advanced Technology Environmental and Energy Center (ATEEC). The module, part of the series Technology and Environmental Decision-Making: A critical-thinking approach to 7 environmental challenges, was initially developed by ATEEC and the Laboratory for Energy and Environment at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and funded by the National Science Foundation. The ATEEC project team has updated this version of the module and gratefully acknowledges the past and present contributions, assistance, and thoughtful critiques of this material provided by authors, content experts, and reviewers. These contributors do not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse these modules. Any errors in the modules are the responsibility of ATEEC. Authors: Melonee Docherty, ATEEC Michael Beck, ATEEC Editor: Glo Hanne, ATEEC Copyright 2017, ATEEC This project was supported, in part, by the Advanced Technological Education Program at the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE #1204958. The information provided in this instructional material does not necessarily represent NSF policy. Cover image: Ground water monitoring wells, Cape Cod, MA. Credit: U.S. Geological Survey. Additional copies of this module can be downloaded from the ATEEC website. i Point Source Water Contamination Corroded pipes from Flint’s water distribution system. -
Michigan's Infrastructure
MICHIGAN BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY ROUNDTABLE State of the State: Michigan’s Infrastructure Olivia Rath January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Transportation & Mobility 5 Energy 8 Water 11 Information & Communications 14 Infrastructure & Justice 17 Conclusion & Discussion 19 Appendix A: Potential Infrastructure Investments 21 Appendix B: Resource Guide 23 MICHIGAN BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY ROUNDTABLE | State of the State of Michigan’s Infrastructure 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he State of Michigan is well positioned for economic, social and environmental leadership: The combination of engineering talent, powerhouse academic institutions, unparalleled T freshwater ecosystems, automotive and mobility leadership and more distinguish the state on a national level. Appropriately caring for and investing in its infrastructure can help drive the state toward an economically robust, environmentally sustainable and socially just future. • Transportation & Mobility: Building on its history of mobilizing the world, Michigan has an opportunity to demonstrate leadership in future mobility that prioritizes carbon neutrality, public health and safety, and economic strength. Addressing rapidly deteriorating transportation infrastructure is key. • Energy: Given Michigan’s stated goals on carbon neutrality, shifting the state’s energy system to become increasingly digital, decarbonized and distributed is essential. Efforts to upgrade and expand existing aging infrastructure are important as well. • Water: A severe public health crisis has illustrated the consequences of underinvestment and decision-making without adequate community representation. The state has an opportunity to use machine learning to identify and replace hazardous water lines and address stormwater and wastewater vulnerabilities, and move toward a Michigan that is purer for all. • Information & Communications: Enhanced information and communications infrastructure can enable proactive, real-time asset management across all infrastructure. -
Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan
Draft Environmental Assessment Flint River Flood Mitigation Alternatives Saginaw County, Michigan Flint River Erosion Control Board FEMA-DR-1346-MI, HMGP Project No. A1346.53 April 2006 U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60605 This document was prepared by URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Contract No. EMW-2000-CO-0246, Task Order No. 138. Job No. 15292488.00100 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ iii Section 1 ONE Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Authority..........................................................................................1 1.2 Project Location and Setting........................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................2 Section 2 TWO Alternative Analysis .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative.........................................................3 2.2 Alternative 2 – Dike Reconstruction and Reservoir Construction (Proposed Action) ........................................................................................3 2.2.1 Project Segment -
Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN
Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org Flint River GREEN Notebook Table of Contents Section One - Introduction to Flint River GREEN a. FRWC b. GREEN c. Earth Force d. MSU Extension; 4-H Youth Development e. School Administration Letter (Phase II & Participant Appreciation) f. Flint River GREEN Objectives Section Two – Information for Mentors a. Who are mentors? b. Timeline for Teachers and Mentor Interactions c. Importance of Mentors d. Inquiry Training e. How to talk to youth f. Sample Presentations for Mentors Section Three – BEFORE River Activities a. Curriculum Benchmarks and Standards i. 8th Grade Earth Science Standards ii. 10th Grade Biology Standards b. Incorporating Other Teachers iii. Civic Engagement: Social Studies, Language Arts iv. Technology: Media Support, Presentations v. Sharing Testing: Chemistry, Mathematics c. Ordering Materials vi. Shelf Life of Chemicals vii. Disposal of Old Chemicals d. Inquiry Training: Why is the Data Important viii. How Can the Information Be Used ix. Who Is Currently Interested in the Data e. Selecting A Testing Site / Finding A Good Fit f. Preparing Kids for the Day at the River x. Attire Flint River GREEN www.FlintRiver.org xi. Who Does Which Test g. Run Through the Tests h. Looking at Historical Data i. Permission Slip/Photo releases j. Notifying the media and elected officials xii. Sample Press Release k. Optional Activities xiii. Model Watershed Activity xiv. Watershed Planning – Desired & Designated Uses xv. ELUCID – Flint River Watershed by MSU Institute of Water Research Section Four – Day At the River a. Deciding Who Goes to the River b. Checklist for Things to Take Out to the River c. -
Water Quality Indicators
SECTION 4 - WATER QUALITY INDICATORS RIVERINE HABITAT STUDIES Fisheries Studies The original fish communities of the Great Lakes region are of recent origin. Melt water from the Wisconsinan glacier created aquatic environments for fish. Original fish gained access through migration from connecting waterways. A description of the fish community in the Flint River Watershed at the time of European settlement (early 1800’s) is not available. However anecdotal accounts of the time mention several species. Surveys on the Flint River and several tributaries in 1927 provide a reasonable account for additional indigenous fish species (MDNR, Fishery Division). Seventy-seven species are believed to indigenous to the Flint River Watershed. The Original fish habitat of the Flint River watershed has been greatly altered by human settlement. The 1900’s gave rise to the industrial era and the urbanization of the Flint River watershed. City’s and towns located near the river became more developed as their population increased. The discharge of human wastes and synthetic pollutants into the river degraded water quality to the extent that only the most tolerant fish species could survive. Dams were built for flood control, flow augmentation, and water supply to municipalities and industry. The biologic communities in the Flint River and its tributaries have improved significantly since the 1970’s with water quality improvements. Continued efforts to improve water quality will most probably result in greater biological integrity and diversity. Although 77 species of fish remain present, at least 5 fish species that once used the Flint River for spawning (lake sturgeon, muskellunge, lake trout, lake herring, lake whitefish) are believed extirpated from the river. -
Management Weaknesses Delayed Response to Flint Water Crisis
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Ensuring clean and safe water Compliance with the law Management Weaknesses Delayed Response to Flint Water Crisis Report No. 18-P-0221 July 19, 2018 Report Contributors: Stacey Banks Charles Brunton Kathlene Butler Allison Dutton Tiffine Johnson-Davis Fred Light Jayne Lilienfeld-Jones Tim Roach Luke Stolz Danielle Tesch Khadija Walker Abbreviations CCT Corrosion Control Treatment CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FY Fiscal Year GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office LCR Lead and Copper Rule MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality OECA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance OIG Office of Inspector General OW Office of Water ppb parts per billion PQL Practical Quantitation Limit PWSS Public Water System Supervision SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act Cover Photo: EPA Region 5 emergency response vehicle in Flint, Michigan. (EPA photo) Are you aware of fraud, waste or abuse in an EPA Office of Inspector General EPA program? 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2410T) Washington, DC 20460 EPA Inspector General Hotline (202) 566-2391 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2431T) www.epa.gov/oig Washington, DC 20460 (888) 546-8740 (202) 566-2599 (fax) [email protected] Subscribe to our Email Updates Follow us on Twitter @EPAoig Learn more about our OIG Hotline. Send us your Project Suggestions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 18-P-0221 Office of Inspector General July 19, 2018 At a Glance Why We Did This Project Management Weaknesses -
2018 2019 Annual Report
2018 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 00 L FROM THE CHAIR As chair of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission, I am pleased to share TABLE OF with you this report highlighting the work of the Commission and the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, the agency that serves as the CONTENTS investigative arm of the Commission, for the years 2018-2019. The Commission has worked diligently to advance the mission of protecting the civil rights of all Michiganders and visitors to Michigan. 2 Who We Are / What We Do We took actions and made decisions on issues of great importance to 4 The Commission 2019 thousands of people throughout Michigan. 6 The Commission 2018 8 MDCR Leads On Racial Equity In May of 2018, we issued a landmark interpretive statement on the 10 Commission Issues Update On Groundbreaking meaning of the word “sex” in the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. That Flint Water Crisis Report action provided an avenue for the first time for individuals in Michigan 11 Study Guide Enables Educators to file complaints of discrimination on the basis of gender identity To Teach The Lessons Of Flint and sexual orientation. In 2018 and 2019, we held hearings throughout 12 Court Ruling Re-Opens The Door To Discrimination Michigan on inequities in K-12 education. Our report, when completed, Complaints From Prisoners will be shared with the public and decision makers. Finally, in 2019 we 13 Commission Issues Interpretive Statement overcame a challenging period of transition in the leadership of the On Meaning Of "Sex" In ELCRA Department and ended the year with a clear vision of the Director we 14 Commission Holds Hearings On Discrimination In are seeking to head the Department in 2020 and beyond. -
Lessons from the Flint Water Crisis Mindy Myers Wayne State University
Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2018 Democratic Communication: Lessons From The Flint Water Crisis Mindy Myers Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Part of the Other Communication Commons, and the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Myers, Mindy, "Democratic Communication: Lessons From The Flint Water Crisis" (2018). Wayne State University Dissertations. 2120. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/2120 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. DEMOCRATIC COMMUNICATION: LESSONS FROM THE FLINT WATER CRISIS by MINDY MYERS DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2018 MAJOR: ENGLISH Approved By: _____________________________________________ Advisor Date _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ©COPYRIGHT BY MINDY MYERS 2018 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION To my Mom and Dad for being the kids’ granny nanny and Uber driver, so I could get work done. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation advisor, Richard Marback, for his vision, guidance and support. Without your help this project would never have been possible. I am grateful as well to Jeff Pruchnic, Donnie Sackey, and Marc Kruman for their insight and expertise. I would also like to thank Caroline Maun. Your kindness and support have meant more to me than you know. I would like to thank my husband, Jeremiah, a true partner who has always considered my career as important as his own. -
Absent State Request Flint Mi
Absent State Request Flint Mi Slippier and lossy Ritch palpated her revisionists obelizes while Tobias push-start some intis abstemiously. Anamnestic Salomon spring that fornication scabble noisily and cascades therefore. Undependable Thatch never hae so taintlessly or query any flippant stepwise. Fire-EMS Operations and Data Analysis Flint Michigan page ii. I add a United States citizen input a qualified and registered elector of the vice and jurisdiction in with State of Michigan listed below and I apply select an official. Students who are perhaps from the University for success than one calendar year shall be. The Safe Drinking Water Act human the grow of Michigan the Michigan Department. Flint Water Study Updates Up-to-date information on our. STATE OF MICHIGAN IN upper CIRCUIT except FOR THE. Argued that Michigan's absent voter counting boards are not allowing. How Clinton lost Michigan and blew the election POLITICO. 201-19 Student Handbook or for Countywide Programs. The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission EEOC also. Ex-aide to Snyder Dismiss Flint water perjury charge. Julie A Gafkay Gafkay Law Frankenmuth Michigan. Title VI of whatever Civil Rights Act are characterized by an absence of separation. Page 3 Water fang Water drink Water OOSKAnews. Amend the estimate as requested by the parent or eligible student the memories will notify. This month in request absent flint mi for absent state capitol to comply with. To to attorney has other professional if you resist such information from us. EPA continues to inspect homeowner drinking water systems to choice the presence or absence of lead. -
Annotated Flint Water Crisis Timeline 2009 2010
Annotated Flint Water Crisis Timeline *Enclosed Document ^Referenced in Documentary 2009 February o Michael Brown serves as Temporary Mayor.^ August o Dayne Walling elected as Mayor.^ September Preliminary Engineering Report Lake Huron Water Supply Karegnondi Water Authority*^ o The third study of the Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA) plan. Prior reports were in 1992 and 2006. This report was meant to study 2 alternatives, continuing purchase of water from Detroit Water and Sewage Department (DWSD) or to build a new pipeline to supply raw water from Lake Huron. o This report clearly states the differences between raw and treated water, and explains in detail the construction costs needed to upgrade Flint’s Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in order to properly treat water. o Additionally, in Appendix 7, the report mentions the lead and copper program and corrosion control requirements, even including the chemical composition of orthophosphate. o An upgrade to the WTP of approximately $7 million would be required in order for the plant to properly treat water on a continuous basis. o These upgrades are necessary to destroy bacteria, viruses, and prevent waterborne disease. Note: At the time of the inception of the KWA, the requirements of treating raw water, upgrades needed to be done for the WTP to properly treat water, and cost estimates of DWSD being more cost effective than the KWA were clear and known to at least two persons, Drain County Commissioner Jeff Wright and Mayor Walling. Both of whom had clear legal, ethical, and patriotic duty to the citizens of Flint as their elected representatives.