DOCSLIB.ORG

Relationships Between Muslims and Christians in Colonial Latin America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relationships Between Muslims and Christians in Colonial Latin America Contesting belonging: Relationships between Muslims and Christians in colonial Latin America Karoline Cook In the early modern period, Muslims and Moriscos (Iberian converts from Islam to Catholicism) played an often overlooked role in social and reli- gious transformations in colonial Latin America. More scholarly atten- tion has been paid to their presence in Brazil and the Caribbean, where a significant population of enslaved African Muslims who laboured in sugar production rose up in a series of well-documented rebellions dur- ing the 19th century.1 In contrast to the Portuguese, British, and French empires, the Spanish Crown prohibited the passage of Muslims, converts from Islam, and their descendants to the lands it claimed in the west- ern hemisphere. The legal restrictions faced by Muslims and Moriscos in Spanish America, and the ways the Crown projected its image glob- ally as a Catholic empire, had a direct impact on everyday relationships between Muslims and Christians in the ‘New World’. By the late 15th century, the Spanish and Portuguese Crowns were in competition for control over Atlantic maritime routes. They negotiated a series of treaties and each sought papal support to bolster their claims. Competition intensified following Christopher Columbus’s return to Castile in March 1493, as news of distant islands across the Atlantic, thought to be located near the shores of East Asia, prompted a new round of negotiations. When Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabel of Cas- tile approached Pope Alexander VI (r. 1492-1503), he issued the Bull Inter caetera (1493) upholding the Spanish Crown’s jurisdiction over any peoples they encountered.2 The text of Inter caetera made explicit 1 For Brazil and the Caribbean, see especially J.J. Reis, Slave rebellion in Brazil. The Muslim uprising of 1835 in Bahia, Baltimore MD, 1993; M. Barcia, West African warfare in Bahia and Cuba. Soldier slaves in the Atlantic world, 1807-1844, Oxford, 2014. For an excel- lent work on enslaved Muslims in the Americas, see S.A. Diouf, Servants of Allah. African Muslims enslaved in the Americas, New York, 1998. On Muslims and Moriscos in Spanish America, see K.P. Cook, Forbidden passages. Muslims and Moriscos in colonial Spanish America, Philadelphia PA, 2016. 2 A copy of the Bull Inter caetera in Spanish translation, thought to have been printed in 1511, is held at the John Carter Brown Library in Providence, Rhode Island, Copia dela 726 contesting belonging reference to Ferdinand and Isabel’s recent conquest of the Nāṣrid Emir- ate of Granada in 1492, making them well-suited as the self-styled ‘Catho- lic monarchs’ to continue the expansion of Christianity overseas. The Spanish and Portuguese monarchs subsequently negotiated the Treaty of Tordesillas (1494) to divide their respective authorities in the western and eastern hemispheres along a meridian located 370 leagues west of the Cape Verde Islands. Granted jurisdiction over the lands west of the meridian, the Spanish Crown soon issued legislation that would promote Christian settlement of the Caribbean islands and any other lands to be ‘discovered’ by them. The privileged status bestowed on the Spanish monarchs by the bull Inter caetera formed the basis not only of the Crown’s ongoing interest in evangelisation, but also of its policies shaping emigration and the devel- opment of colonial society. As noted by Alexander VI in Inter caetera, privileges over the islands and mainland to be discovered by future expe- ditions were granted to Spain in recognition ‘that you [the Catholic mon- archs] have long since dedicated to this purpose your whole soul and all your endeavours – as witnessed in these times with so much glory to the Divine Name in your recovery of the kingdom of Granada from the yoke of the Saracens – we therefore are rightly led, and hold it as our duty, to grant you … those things, whereby with effort each day … you may be enabled for the honour of God himself and the spread of the Christian rule to carry forward your holy and praiseworthy purpose so pleasing to immortal God.’3 Assuming the role of ‘Catholic monarchs’, Ferdinand and Isabel emphasised the conversion of indigenous peoples to Christianity to justify Spain’s jurisdiction over the Americas. Facing growing challenges from England and France by the 16th century over their claims to the continent, Spain’s rulers continued to promote poli- cies that included restricting emigration to ‘old Christians’ who could prove they had no Muslim or Jewish ancestors. From the early 16th cen- tury, the Spanish Crown issued royal decrees or cédulas prohibiting Mus- lim and Morisco presence in the Americas.4 bula dela concession q[ue] hizo el papa Alexandre sexto al Rey [y] ala Reyna nuestros señores: de las Indias: In nomine d[omi]ni. Amen. Nouerint vniuersi hoc presens publicu[m] trasumptu[m] inspecturi q[uo]d nos Jacobus co[n]chillos dei [et] apostolice sedis gratia e[pisco]pus Cathaniensis. 3 Translated in F.G. Davenport (ed.), European treaties bearing on the history of the United States and its dependencies to 1648, Washington DC, 1917, p. 61. 4 The entry on ‘Legislation restricting Muslim presence in colonial Spanish America’ in this volume provides further detail concerning the royal decrees and their significance..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The “Doctrine of Discovery” and Terra Nullius: a Catholic Response
    1 The “Doctrine of Discovery” and Terra Nullius: A Catholic Response The following text considers and repudiates illegitimate concepts and principles used by Europeans to justify the seizure of land previously held by Indigenous Peoples and often identified by the terms Doctrine of Discovery and terra nullius. An appendix provides an historical overview of the development of these concepts vis-a-vis Catholic teaching and of their repudiation. The presuppositions behind these concepts also undergirded the deeply regrettable policy of the removal of Indigenous children from their families and cultures in order to place them in residential schools. The text includes commitments which are recommended as a better way of walking together with Indigenous Peoples. Preamble The Truth and Reconciliation process of recent years has helped us to recognize anew the historical abuses perpetrated against Indigenous peoples in our land. We have also listened to and been humbled by courageous testimonies detailing abuse, inhuman treatment, and cultural denigration committed through the residential school system. In this brief note, which is an expression of our determination to collaborate with First Nations, Inuit and Métis in moving forward, and also in part a response to the Calls to Action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, we would like to reflect in particular on how land was often seized from its Indigenous inhabitants without their consent or any legal justification. The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB), the Canadian Catholic Aboriginal Council and other Catholic organizations have been reflecting on the concepts of the Doctrine of Discovery and terra nullius for some time (a more detailed historical analysis is included in the attached Appendix).
    [Show full text]
  • From Papal Bull to Racial Rule: Indians of the Americas, Race, and the Foundations of International Law
    Vera: From Papal Bull to Racial Rule: Indians of the Americas, Race, an FROM PAPAL BULL TO RACIAL RULE: INDIANS OF THE AMERICAS, RACE, AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW KIM BENITA VERA* The "discovery" and conquest of the "New World" marked the inauguration of international law,' and constituted a watershed moment in the emergence of race in European thought.2 What might the coterminous rise of formative. moments in race thinking and international law suggest? In my provisional reflections on this question that follow, I trace juridical and religio-racial conceptions of indigenous peoples of the Americas as a central thread in the evolution of international law. I will begin with a discussion of the fifteenth-century papal bulls issued in regard to the Portugal-Spain disputes over lands in Africa and the Americas. I will then proceed to follow some strands of racial and juridical thought in the accounts of Francisco de Vitoria and Hugo Grotius, two founding figures in international law. I suggest that Vitoria's treatise, On the Indians Lately Discovered,3 evinces the beginnings of the shift Carl Schmitt identifies from the papal authority of the respublica Christiana to modern international law.4 Vitoria's account, moreover, is both proto-secular and proto-racial. * Assistant Professor, Legal Studies Department, University of Illinois at Springfield, J.D./Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2006. 1. See, e.g., CARL ScHMrT, THE NOMOS OF THE EARTH IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE Jus PUBLICUM EUROPAEUM 49 (G. L. Ulmen trans., 2003). 2. DAVID THEO GOLDBERG, RACIST CULTURE: PHILOSOPHY AND THE POLITICS OF MEANING 62 (1993).
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Doctrine of Discovery
    The Christian Doctrine of Discovery By Dan Whittemore, Denver, Colorado, USA For centuries, indigenous peoples around the world have suffered the disastrous impact of European colonization. As a Christian, descended from Europeans, I am remorseful and repentant because I am complicit in this problem. Undoubtedly some of my ancestors helped create the situation that has resulted in discrimination and prejudicial and derogatory concepts of the original inhabitants. Broken contracts, ignorance of native culture and spirituality, and illegitimate appropriation of lands have contributed to poverty and psychological damage that persist. We are challenged to examine the root causes and make corrections. The centuries-old Christian Doctrine of Discovery, if repudiated, could initiate justice for all indigenous people. The Doctrine of Discovery is the premise that European Christian explorers who “discovered” other lands had the authority to claim those lands and subdue, even enslave, peoples simply because they were not Christian. This concept has become embedded in the legal policies of countries throughout the world. This is an issue of greed, oppression, colonialism, and racism. The doctrine’s origins can be traced to Pope Nicholas V, who issued the papal bull1 Romanus Pontifex in 1455 CE. The bull allowed Portugal to claim and conquer lands in West Africa. After Christopher Columbus began conquering newly “found” lands in the Americas, Pope Alexander VI granted to Spain the right to claim these lands with the papal bull, Inter caetera, issued in 1493. The Treaty of Tordesillas settled competition between Spain and Portugal. It established two principles: 1) that only non-Christian lands could be taken, and 2) that potential discoveries would be allocated between Portugal and Spain by drawing a line of demarcation.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Daughter of Babylon?
    WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF BABYLON? ● Babylon was initially a minor city-state, and controlled little surrounding territory; its first four Amorite rulers did not assume the title of king. The older and more powerful states of Assyria, Elam, Isin, and Larsa overshadowed Babylon until it became the capital of Hammurabi's short-lived empire about a century later. Hammurabi (r. 1792–1750 BC) is famous for codifying the laws of Babylonia into the Code of Hammurabi. He conquered all of the cities and city states of southern Mesopotamia, including Isin, Larsa, Ur, Uruk, Nippur, Lagash, Eridu, Kish, Adab, Eshnunna, Akshak, Akkad, Shuruppak, Bad-tibira, Sippar, and Girsu, coalescing them into one kingdom, ruled from Babylon. Hammurabi also invaded and conquered Elam to the east, and the kingdoms of Mari and Ebla to the northwest. After a protracted struggle with the powerful Assyrian king Ishme-Dagan of the Old Assyrian Empire, he forced his successor to pay tribute late in his reign, spreading Babylonian power to Assyria's Hattian and Hurrian colonies in Asia Minor. After the reign of Hammurabi, the whole of southern Mesopotamia came to be known as Babylonia, whereas the north had already coalesced centuries before into Assyria. From this time, Babylon supplanted Nippur and Eridu as the major religious centers of southern Mesopotamia. Hammurabi's empire destabilized after his death. Assyrians defeated and drove out the Babylonians and Amorites. The far south of Mesopotamia broke away, forming the native Sealand Dynasty, and the Elamites appropriated territory in eastern Mesopotamia. The Amorite dynasty remained in power in Babylon, which again became a small city-state.
    [Show full text]
  • John Marshall and Indian Land Rights: a Historical Rejoinder to the Claim of “Universal Recognition” of the Doctrine of Discovery
    WATSON 1-9-06 FINAL.DOC 1/9/2006 8:36:03 AM John Marshall and Indian Land Rights: A Historical Rejoinder to the Claim of “Universal Recognition” of the Doctrine of Discovery Blake A. Watson∗ I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................481 II. JOHNSON V. MCINTOSH ...................................................................483 III. ROGER WILLIAMS AND “THE SINNE OF THE PATTENTS” .................487 IV. EUROPEAN VIEWS OF INDIAN LAND RIGHTS DURING “THE AGE OF DISCOVERY” ......................................................................498 A. Spanish Views of Indian Land Rights ................................499 B. French Views of Indian Land Rights .................................511 C. Dutch and Swedish Views of Indian Land Rights .............517 D. Early English and Colonial Views of Indian Land Rights ..................................................................................520 V. “THE SINNE OF THE PATTENTS” REDUX: INDIAN TITLE IN NEW JERSEY ............................................................................................540 I. INTRODUCTION John Marshall was a historian as well as a jurist. In 1804, in the introductory volume of his five-volume series entitled The Life of George Washington, Marshall sought to place Washington’s life in con- text by presenting a lengthy narrative “of the principal events preceding our revolutionary war.”1 Almost twenty years later, when crafting the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v. McIntosh,2 Marshall relied heavily on his history of America “from its discovery to the present day” in order to proclaim “the universal rec- ognition” of two legal principles: (1) that European discovery of lands in America “gave exclusive title to those who made it”; and (2) that ∗ Professor of Law, University of Dayton School of Law. J.D. 1981, Duke Univer- sity School of Law; B.A. 1978, Vanderbilt University. Research for this Article was supported by the University of Dayton School of Law through a summer research grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctrine of Discovery: Questions and Answers
    Doctrine of Discovery: Questions and Answers Q. What is the Doctrine of Discovery? The Doctrine of Discovery is a principle of international law dating from the late 15th century. It has its roots in a papal decree issued by Pope Nicholas V in 1452 that specifically sanctioned and promoted the conquest, colonization, and exploitation of non-Christian territories and peoples. Hundreds of years of decisions and laws continuing right up to our own time can ultimately be traced back to the Doctrine of Discovery—laws that invalidate or ignore the rights, sovereignty, and humanity of indigenous peoples in the United States and around the world. Q. Why does the Doctrine of Discovery still matter when it is over 500 years old? It is still in effect and is written into settled US law since 1823 about a land dispute between two individuals (Under Chief Justice John Marshall). It forms the basis for “Manifest Destiny,” the expansion into Indian lands. It is used to justify legal and forcible takeover of indigenous lands, without just compensation. The Discovery Doctrine is a concept of public international law expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most notably Johnson v. McIntosh in 1823. In this Supreme Court case, Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in the unanimous decision held "that the principle of discovery gave European nations an absolute right to New World lands." In essence, American Indians had only a right of occupancy, which could be abolished.” (Source: www.redlakenationnews.com/story/2017/06/15/news/doctrine- of-discovery-repudiated/61672.html) It is used to interpret Indian Treaties in a way that has undermined treaty rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The LEGACY of CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS in the AMERICAS New Nations and a Transatlantic Discourse of Empire
    The LEGACY of CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS in the AMERICAS New Nations and a Transatlantic Discourse of Empire Elise Bartosik-Vélez The Legacy of Christopher Columbus in the Americas The LEGACY of CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS in the AMERICAS New Nations and a Transatlantic Discourse of Empire Elise Bartosik-Vélez Vanderbilt University Press NASHVILLE © 2014 by Vanderbilt University Press Nashville, Tennessee 37235 All rights reserved First printing 2014 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data on file LC control number 2013007832 LC classification number e112 .b294 2014 Dewey class number 970.01/5 isbn 978-0-8265-1953-5 (cloth) isbn 978-0-8265-1955-9 (ebook) For Bryan, Sam, and Sally Contents Acknowledgments ................................. ix Introduction .......................................1 chapter 1 Columbus’s Appropriation of Imperial Discourse ............................ 15 chapter 2 The Incorporation of Columbus into the Story of Western Empire ................. 44 chapter 3 Columbus and the Republican Empire of the United States ............................. 66 chapter 4 Colombia: Discourses of Empire in Spanish America ............................ 106 Conclusion: The Meaning of Empire in Nationalist Discourses of the United States and Spanish America ........................... 145 Notes ........................................... 153 Works Cited ..................................... 179 Index ........................................... 195 Acknowledgments any people helped me as I wrote this book. Michael Palencia-Roth has been an unfailing mentor and model of Methical, rigorous scholarship and human compassion. I am grate- ful for his generous help at many stages of writing this manu- script. I am also indebted to my friend Christopher Francese, of the Department of Classical Studies at Dickinson College, who has never hesitated to answer my queries about pretty much any- thing related to the classical world.
    [Show full text]
  • Bartolomé De Las Casas, Soldiers of Fortune, And
    HONOR AND CARITAS: BARTOLOMÉ DE LAS CASAS, SOLDIERS OF FORTUNE, AND THE CONQUEST OF THE AMERICAS Dissertation Submitted To The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Damian Matthew Costello UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio August 2013 HONOR AND CARITAS: BARTOLOMÉ DE LAS CASAS, SOLDIERS OF FORTUNE, AND THE CONQUEST OF THE AMERICAS Name: Costello, Damian Matthew APPROVED BY: ____________________________ Dr. William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Chair ____________________________ Dr. Sandra Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member ____________________________ Dr. Anthony B. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member _____________________________ Dr. Roberto S. Goizueta, Ph.D. Committee Member ii ABSTRACT HONOR AND CARITAS: BARTOLOMÉ DE LAS CASAS, SOLDIERS OF FORTUNE, AND THE CONQUEST OF THE AMERICAS Name: Costello, Damian Matthew University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. William L. Portier This dissertation - a postcolonial re-examination of Bartolomé de las Casas, the 16th century Spanish priest often called “The Protector of the Indians” - is a conversation between three primary components: a biography of Las Casas, an interdisciplinary history of the conquest of the Americas and early Latin America, and an analysis of the Spanish debate over the morality of Spanish colonialism. The work adds two new theses to the scholarship of Las Casas: a reassessment of the process of Spanish expansion and the nature of Las Casas’s opposition to it. The first thesis challenges the dominant paradigm of 16th century Spanish colonialism, which tends to explain conquest as the result of perceived religious and racial difference; that is, Spanish conquistadors turned to military force as a means of imposing Spanish civilization and Christianity on heathen Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doctrine of Discovery, 1493 Introduction Questions for Discussion
    1 The Doctrine of Discovery, 1493 Introduction The Papal Bull “Inter Caetera,” issued by Pope Alexander VI on May 4, 1493, played a central role in the Spanish conquest of the New World. The document supported Spain’s strategy to ensure its exclusive right to the lands discovered by Columbus the previous year. It established a demarcation line one hundred leagues west of the Azores and Cape Verde Islands and assigned Spain the exclusive right to acquire territorial possessions and to trade in all lands west of that line. All others were forbidden to approach the lands west of the line without special license from the rulers of Spain. This effectively gave Spain a monopoly on the lands in the New World. The Bull stated that any land not inhabited by Christians was available to be “discovered,” claimed, and exploited by Christian rulers and declared that “the Catholic faith and the Christian religion be exalted and be everywhere increased and spread, that the health of souls be cared for and that barbarous nations be overthrown and brought to the faith itself.” This “Doctrine of Discovery” became the basis of all European claims in the Americas as well as the foundation for the United States’ western expansion. In the US Supreme Court in the 1823 case Johnson v. McIntosh, Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in the unanimous decision held “that the principle of discovery gave European nations an absolute right to New World lands.” In essence, American Indians had only a right of occupancy, which could be abolished. The Bull Inter Caetera made headlines again throughout the 1990s and in 2000, when many Catholics petitioned Pope John Paul II to formally revoke it and recognize the human rights of indigenous “non-Christian peoples.” Questions for Discussion Read the introduction and the document transcript in order to answer these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Image Credits, Indian Ocean in World History, March 28, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREHISTORIC ERA .......................................................................................................................................... 2 ANCIENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 CLASSICAL ERA ............................................................................................................................................ 10 MEDIEVAL ERA ............................................................................................................................................ 16 FIRST GLOBAL ERA ...................................................................................................................................... 23 INDUSTRIAL AND IMPERIAL ERA ................................................................................................................. 31 20TH CENTURY AND MODERN ERA .............................................................................................................. 39 1 Image Credits, Indian Ocean in World History, March 28, 2010 PREHISTORIC ERA Arabian or Persian Gulf 1-2. © NASA, Washington, DC Blombos Cave Artifacts 1-3. © Blombos Cave Project, Cape Town Bridge to Ice Age Sahul 1. © NASA, Washington, DC 2. Courtesy of Eco Lodges Indonesia, Satwa Sumatra Eco Elephant Lodges Description of the Indian Ocean 1. © Intute, University of Manchester Dr. Li Jin © National
    [Show full text]
  • Doctrine of Discovery
    United Nations E/C.19/2010/13 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 February 2010 Original: English Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Ninth session New York, 19-30 April 2010 Items 4 and 7 of the provisional agenda* Human rights Future work of the Permanent Forum, including issues of the Economic and Social Council and emerging issues Preliminary study of the impact on indigenous peoples of the international legal construct known as the Doctrine of Discovery Submitted by the Special Rapporteur Summary At its eighth session in May 2009, the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues decided to appoint as Special Rapporteur Tonya Gonnella Frichner, a member of the Permanent Forum, to conduct a preliminary study of the impact on indigenous peoples of the international legal construct known as the Doctrine of Discovery, which has served as the foundation of the violation of their human rights, and to report thereon to the Forum at its ninth session. This preliminary study establishes that the Doctrine of Discovery has been institutionalized in law and policy, on national and international levels, and lies at the root of the violations of indigenous peoples’ human rights, both individual and collective. This has resulted in State claims to and the mass appropriation of the lands, territories and resources of indigenous peoples. Both the Doctrine of Discovery and a holistic structure that we term the Framework of Dominance have resulted in centuries of virtually unlimited resource extraction from the traditional territories of indigenous peoples. This, in turn, has resulted in the dispossession and impoverishment of indigenous peoples, and the host of problems that they face today on a daily basis.
    [Show full text]
  • RELIGION and CONFLICT in AFRICA with a SPECIAL FOCUS on EAST AFRICA Bjørn Møller DIIS REPORT 2006:6 DIIS REPORT DIIS
    DIIS REPORT 2006:6 RELIGION AND CONFLICT IN AFRICA WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON EAST AFRICA Bjørn Møller DIIS REPORT 2006:6 DIIS REPORT DIIS DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 1 DIIS REPORT 2006:6 © Copenhagen 2006 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK -1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Layout: Allan Lind Jørgensen Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN: 87-7605-145-5 Price: DKK 50.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk Hardcopies can be ordered at www.diis.dk This publication is part of DIIS’s Defence and Security Studies project which is funded by a grant from the Danish Ministry of Defence. Bjørn Møller, Senior Research Fellow, DIIS,DIIS, [email protected]@diis.dk The author holds an MA in History and a Ph.D. in International Relations, both from the University of Copenhagen. Since 1985, he has been (senior) research fellow, subsequently programme director at the Copenhagen Peace Research Institute (COPRI), which in 2003 became part of the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). He served as Secretary General of the International Peace Research Association (IPRA) from 1997 to 2000, and has been External Lecturer at the Institute of Political Studies, University of Copenhagen since 1994 and at the Centre of African Studies since 2002. In the academic year 2003/04, he served as Visiting Associate Professor at the research centre on Development and International Relations (DIR) at Aalborg University, where he is pres- ently external lecturer.
    [Show full text]