Centrosome Separation Driven by Actin- Microfilaments During Mitosis Is Mediated by Centrosome-Associated Tyrosine-Phosphorylated Cortactin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Centrosome Separation Driven by Actin- Microfilaments During Mitosis Is Mediated by Centrosome-Associated Tyrosine-Phosphorylated Cortactin 1334 Research Article Centrosome separation driven by actin- microfilaments during mitosis is mediated by centrosome-associated tyrosine-phosphorylated cortactin Wenqi Wang*, Luyun Chen*, Yubo Ding, Jing Jin and Kan Liao‡ State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, Peopleʼs Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work ‡Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 31 January 2008 Journal of Cell Science 121, 1334-1343 Published by The Company of Biologists 2008 doi:10.1242/jcs.018176 Summary The regulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation is an phosphorylation sites in the truncated C-terminus of cortactin important aspect during the cell cycle. From G2-M transition and found that the C-terminus could no longer interfere with to mitotic anaphase, phosphorylation of Tyr421, Tyr466 and centrosome separation process. Our study shows that, cortactin Tyr482 of cortactin, an actin-filament associated protein, is phosphorylated at Tyr421, Tyr466 and Tyr482 mediates the dramatically induced. The phosphorylated cortactin is almost actin-filament-driven centrosome separation at G2-M transition exclusively associated with centrosomes or spindle poles by providing a bridge between the centrosome and actin- during mitosis. At G2-M transition prior to the breakdown of filaments. the nuclear envelope, two duplicated centrosomes migrate towards opposite ends of the nucleus to form the spindle poles. This centrosome-separation process and also the start of mitosis Supplementary material available online at are inhibited or delayed by the depolymerization of actin http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/121/8/1334/DC1 filaments. Also inhibited is the separation of centrosomes when a truncated form of cortactin is expressed, whose C-terminus Key words: Cortactin, Cortactin tyrosine phosphorylation, contains the tyrosine phosphorylation region but lacks the actin- Centrosome separation, Actin-filament, Focal adhesion points, Src Journal of Cell Science binding domains. We introduced mutations at the tyrosine kinase Introduction regulation of cell motility and formation of lamellipodia and Cortactin is an actin-filament-binding protein (Olazabal and membrane ruffles (Lua and Low, 2005). Machesky, 2001; Weed and Parsons, 2001). It has initially been During mitosis the complex sequence of events is dominated by described as a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in cells infected with the formation and activity of the microtubule spindle. The initiation v-Src and is a direct substrate of Src kinase (Kanner et al., 1990; of the microtubule spindle is governed by the centrosome, also Wu et al., 1991). Its association with F-actin stabilizes the known as the microtubule-spindle-organization center (Bornens, microfilament network (Huang et al., 1997; Olazabal and Machesky, 2002; Rieder et al., 2001; Kellogg et al., 1994; Joshi, 1993; Mishima 2001; Pant et al., 2006). Of the all the different domains in cortactin, et al., 2004). Consequently, the separation and positioning of the N-terminal acidic region, the F-actin-binding repeats, the helix centrosomes determines the formation and orientation of spindles. domain and the SH3 domain at the C-terminus are relatively The centrosome cycle progresses in a precise order: (1) the conserved from invertebrates to vertebrates (Weed and Parsons, centrosome is duplicated at G1-S transition, (2) cohesion between 2001). The proline-rich domain between the helix domain and C- two duplicated centrosomes is broken in G2 phase, (3) two terminal SH3 domain, however, is only conserved in vertebrates, centrosomes migrate apart in G2-M transition and the separated but not between vertebrates and invertebrates (Weed and Parsons, centrosomes initiate the spindle microtubules to form bipolar 2001). The proline-rich domain of Drosophila melanogaster has spindle in early mitotic phase (Meraldi and Nigg, 2002; Tsou and only 15% homology with its counterpart in mouse. The proline- Stearns, 2006). Therefore, the separation and positioning of rich domain of murine cortactin has six identified phosphorylation centrosomes are crucial for the correct formation of a bipolar spindle, sites (four tyrosine sites and two serine sites) (Huang et al., 1997; which governs the chromosome segregation and the fate of daughter Head et al., 2003; Lua and Low, 2005; Martin et al., 2006). All cells. four identified tyrosine phosphorylation sites are missing in In order to drive the centrosomes to opposite ends of nucleus, Drosophila cortactin (Genebank: AAF55840). The current motion force needs to be generated. It has been reported that actin knowledge regarding the function of cortactin and its tyrosine microfilaments and myosin II are required for centrosome separation phosphorylation mostly concerns actin-network organization, and positioning during mitosis, thus making them ideal candidates Cortactin and centrosome separation 1335 for providing the migration force (Rosenblatt et al., 2004; Burakov constant throughout the cell cycle (Fig. 1B). Similar phosphorylation et al., 2003; Waters et al., 1993). When F-actin is depolymerized and dephosphorylation on Tyr466 and Tyr482 was also observed by addition of latrunculin, centrosome separation is blocked and (data not shown). cells enter mitosis with unseparated centrosomes (Uzbekov et al., In the mitotic phase, the spindle structure is predominantly 2002). In HeLa cells, one major pathway for centrosome separation formed by microtubules, whereas no distinct structure is formed by that occurs prior to nuclear-envelope breakdown is dependent on actin-filaments. As an F-actin-associated protein, cortactin was an intact actin cytoskeleton (Whitehead et al., 1996). These studies evenly distributed in cytoplasm of mitotic cells (Fig. 2A and indicate or imply that actin-filaments provide the essential driving supplementary material Fig. S1). However, P-Tyr-cortactin was force for centrosome separation, which means that a regulatory almost exclusively located at the mitotic spindle poles, identified attachment of actin-filaments to centrosome is required at G2-M by staining for γ-tubulin (Fig. 2B) (Joshi, 1993). Individual transition. Here we show that cortactin phosphorylation at tyrosine antibodies against cortactin phosphorylated at Tyr421 (P-Tyr421- residues is induced in mitotic cells and phospho-cortactin (P- cortactin), Tyr466 (P-Tyr466-cortactin) or Tyr482 (P-Tyr466- cortactin) is associated with centrosomes or spindle poles at G2-M cortactin) (anti-P-Tyr421-cortactin, anti-P-Tyr466-cortactin or anti- transition until mitotic anaphase. We found that the cortactin C- P-Tyr482-cortactin antibodies, respectively) were used to stain terminal region, which can bind to centrosomes but does not mediate spindle poles (Fig. 2B). When mitotic spindles were revealed using the F-actin association, inhibited the centrosome separation prior anti-α-tubulin antibody, P-Tyr-cortactin was found to be located to nuclear envelope breakdown. We also found P-cortactin to be exactly at the spindle poles (Fig. 2C). P-cortactin, which is anchored at the tips of actin fibers in interphase cell. These associated with the spindle poles, was phosphorylated at least on observations indicate that centrosome or spindle-pole-associated P- one of the three Src kinase sites, at Tyr421, Tyr466 or Tyr482 (Fig. cortactin provide the anchor on the centrosome or spindle pole for 2B) (Kanner et al., 1990; Wu et al., 1991; Huang et al., 1997). F-actin attachment. However, this association did not enrich the spindle poles with just phosphorylated tyrosine residues (Fig. 2D). The spindle poles were Results distinct for P-Tyr-cortactin (Fig. 2B,C). Even the overexposed Induction of tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin, and immunofluorescence images show that P-Tyr-cortactin was only association of P-Tyr-cortactin with centrosomes or spindle detected at spindle poles (supplementary material Fig. S1). poles in G2-M cells Besides the staining for P-Tyr-cortactin at centrosomes and In our study of hormone-induced 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation spindle poles, we detected an interaction between P-Tyr-cortactin and mitotic clonal expansion (Jin et al., 2000), an accumulated and the centrosomal protein γ-tubulin (Fig. 1C). Anti-P-Tyr421- tyrosine-phosphorylated protein was identified as P-Tyr-cortactin cortactin antibody immunoprecipitated γ-tubulin in mitotic cells and (data not shown). In hydroxylurea synchronized 3T3-L1 cells, we anti-γ-tubulin antibody immunoprecipitated P-Tyr-cortactin (Fig. observed cell-cycle-dependent phosphorylation of cortactin at 1C). In addition, centrosomal fraction isolated by sucrose-density Tyr421 (Fig. 1A,B). Levels of P-Tyr-cortactin were low in gradient from nocodazole-arrested mitotic cells contained P-Tyr- interphase, G1-S transition or S phase cells. However, it was cortactin (Fig. 1D) (Moudjou and Bornens, 1994). Furthermore, in dramatically increased after cells reached G2 phase. The P-cortactin cells expressing eGFP-tagged cortactin, GFP-cortactin fusion Journal of Cell Science was then dephosphorylated when the cells finished mitosis and protein was visualized at the spindle pole (supplementary material returned to G1 phase (Fig. 1B). Cortactin protein levels were Fig. S1). Fig. 1. Cell-cycle dependent cortactin phosphorylation at Tyr421. (A) Hydroxylurea-synchronized 3T3-L1 cells. Int, control interphase cells; HU, cells arrested
Recommended publications
  • The Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome: the Actin Cytoskeleton and Immune Cell Function
    Disease Markers 29 (2010) 157–175 157 DOI 10.3233/DMA-2010-0735 IOS Press The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: The actin cytoskeleton and immune cell function Michael P. Blundella, Austen Wortha,b, Gerben Boumaa and Adrian J. Thrashera,b,∗ aMolecular Immunology Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK bDepartment of Immunology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK Abstract. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare X-linked recessive primary immunodeficiency characterised by immune dysregulation, microthrombocytopaenia, eczema and lymphoid malignancies. Mutations in the WAS gene can lead to distinct syndrome variations which largely, although not exclusively, depend upon the mutation. Premature termination and deletions abrogate Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) expression and lead to severe disease (WAS). Missense mutations usually result in reduced protein expression and the phenotypically milder X-linked thrombocytopenia (XLT) or attenuated WAS [1–3]. More recently however novel activating mutations have been described that give rise to X-linked neutropenia (XLN), a third syndrome defined by neutropenia with variable myelodysplasia [4–6]. WASP is key in transducing signals from the cell surface to the actin cytoskeleton, and a lack of WASp results in cytoskeletal defects that compromise multiple aspects of normal cellular activity including proliferation, phagocytosis, immune synapse formation, adhesion and directed migration. Keywords: Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, actin polymerization, lymphocytes,
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Significant
    Table 2. Significant (Q < 0.05 and |d | > 0.5) transcripts from the meta-analysis Gene Chr Mb Gene Name Affy ProbeSet cDNA_IDs d HAP/LAP d HAP/LAP d d IS Average d Ztest P values Q-value Symbol ID (study #5) 1 2 STS B2m 2 122 beta-2 microglobulin 1452428_a_at AI848245 1.75334941 4 3.2 4 3.2316485 1.07398E-09 5.69E-08 Man2b1 8 84.4 mannosidase 2, alpha B1 1416340_a_at H4049B01 3.75722111 3.87309653 2.1 1.6 2.84852656 5.32443E-07 1.58E-05 1110032A03Rik 9 50.9 RIKEN cDNA 1110032A03 gene 1417211_a_at H4035E05 4 1.66015788 4 1.7 2.82772795 2.94266E-05 0.000527 NA 9 48.5 --- 1456111_at 3.43701477 1.85785922 4 2 2.8237185 9.97969E-08 3.48E-06 Scn4b 9 45.3 Sodium channel, type IV, beta 1434008_at AI844796 3.79536664 1.63774235 3.3 2.3 2.75319499 1.48057E-08 6.21E-07 polypeptide Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RIKEN cDNA 2310040G17 gene 1417619_at 4 3.38875643 1.4 2 2.69163229 8.84279E-06 0.0001904 BC056474 15 12.1 Mus musculus cDNA clone 1424117_at H3030A06 3.95752801 2.42838452 1.9 2.2 2.62132809 1.3344E-08 5.66E-07 MGC:67360 IMAGE:6823629, complete cds NA 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1454696_at -3.46081884 -4 -1.3 -1.6 -2.6026947 8.58458E-05 0.0012617 beta 1 Gnb1 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1417432_a_at H3094D02 -3.13334396 -4 -1.6 -1.7 -2.5946297 1.04542E-05 0.0002202 beta 1 Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RAD23a homolog (S.
    [Show full text]
  • TLR4 Endocytic Trafficking in Macrophages Modulates TLR4
    Glia Maturation Factor-γ Negatively Modulates TLR4 Signaling by Facilitating TLR4 Endocytic Trafficking in Macrophages This information is current as Wulin Aerbajinai, Kevin Lee, Kyung Chin and Griffin P. of September 28, 2021. Rodgers J Immunol 2013; 190:6093-6103; Prepublished online 15 May 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203048 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/12/6093 Downloaded from References This article cites 47 articles, 19 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/12/6093.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 28, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Glia Maturation Factor-g Negatively Modulates TLR4 Signaling by Facilitating TLR4 Endocytic Trafficking in Macrophages Wulin Aerbajinai, Kevin Lee, Kyung Chin, and Griffin P. Rodgers TLR4 signaling must be tightly regulated to provide both effective immune protection and avoid inflammation-induced pathology. Thus, the mechanisms that negatively regulate the TLR4-triggered inflammatory response are of particular importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrosome Positioning in Vertebrate Development
    Commentary 4951 Centrosome positioning in vertebrate development Nan Tang1,2,*,` and Wallace F. Marshall2,` 1Department of Anatomy, Cardiovascular Research Institute, The University of California, San Francisco, USA 2Department Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of California, San Francisco, USA *Present address: National Institute of Biological Science, Beijing, China `Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Journal of Cell Science 125, 4951–4961 ß 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi: 10.1242/jcs.038083 Summary The centrosome, a major organizer of microtubules, has important functions in regulating cell shape, polarity, cilia formation and intracellular transport as well as the position of cellular structures, including the mitotic spindle. By means of these activities, centrosomes have important roles during animal development by regulating polarized cell behaviors, such as cell migration or neurite outgrowth, as well as mitotic spindle orientation. In recent years, the pace of discovery regarding the structure and composition of centrosomes has continuously accelerated. At the same time, functional studies have revealed the importance of centrosomes in controlling both morphogenesis and cell fate decision during tissue and organ development. Here, we review examples of centrosome and centriole positioning with a particular emphasis on vertebrate developmental systems, and discuss the roles of centrosome positioning, the cues that determine positioning and the mechanisms by which centrosomes respond to these cues. The studies reviewed here suggest that centrosome functions extend to the development of tissues and organs in vertebrates. Key words: Centrosome, Development, Mitotic spindle orientation Introduction radiating out to the cell cortex (Fig. 2A). In some cases, the The centrosome of animal cells (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Focal Adhesion Kinase in Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Potential As a Therapeutic Target
    cancers Review Role of Focal Adhesion Kinase in Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target Frank Aboubakar Nana 1,2 , Marie Vanderputten 1 and Sebahat Ocak 1,3,* 1 Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL et Dermatologie (PNEU), Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 1200 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] (F.A.N.); [email protected] (M.V.) 2 Division of Pneumology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, UCL, 1200 Brussels, Belgium 3 Division of Pneumology, CHU UCL Namur (Godinne Site), UCL, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-2-764-9448; Fax: +32-2-764-9440 Received: 15 September 2019; Accepted: 24 October 2019; Published: 29 October 2019 Abstract: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 15% of all lung cancers and it is clinically the most aggressive type, being characterized by a tendency for early metastasis, with two-thirds of the patients diagnosed with an extensive stage (ES) disease and a five-year overall survival (OS) as low as 5%. There are still no effective targeted therapies in SCLC despite improved understanding of the molecular steps leading to SCLC development and progression these last years. After four decades, the only modest improvement in OS of patients suffering from ES-SCLC has recently been shown in a trial combining atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, with carboplatin and etoposide, chemotherapy agents. This highlights the need to pursue research efforts in this field. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase that is overexpressed and activated in several cancers, including SCLC, and contributing to cancer progression and metastasis through its important role in cell proliferation, survival, adhesion, spreading, migration, and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrosome Impairment Causes DNA Replication Stress Through MLK3
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.09.898684; this version posted January 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Centrosome impairment causes DNA replication stress through MLK3/MK2 signaling and R-loop formation Zainab Tayeh 1, Kim Stegmann 1, Antonia Kleeberg 1, Mascha Friedrich 1, Josephine Ann Mun Yee Choo 1, Bernd Wollnik 2, and Matthias Dobbelstein 1* 1) Institute of Molecular Oncology, Göttingen Center of Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany 2) Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany *Lead Contact. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M. D. (e-mail: [email protected]; ORCID 0000-0001-5052-3967) Running title: Centrosome integrity supports DNA replication Key words: Centrosome, CEP152, CCP110, SASS6, CEP152, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4), DNA replication, DNA fiber assays, R-loops, MLK3, MK2 alias MAPKAPK2, Seckel syndrome, microcephaly. Highlights: • Centrosome defects cause replication stress independent of mitosis. • MLK3, p38 and MK2 (alias MAPKAPK2) are signalling between centrosome defects and DNA replication stress through R-loop formation. • Patient-derived cells with defective centrosomes display replication stress, whereas inhibition of MK2 restores their DNA replication fork progression and proliferation. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.09.898684; this version posted January 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitin in Influenza Virus Entry and Innate Immunity
    viruses Review Ubiquitin in Influenza Virus Entry and Innate Immunity Alina Rudnicka 1 and Yohei Yamauchi 1,2,3,* 1 Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK 3 Structural Biology Research Center, Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-117-331-2067 Academic Editors: Eric Freed and Thomas Klimkait Received: 14 September 2016; Accepted: 14 October 2016; Published: 24 October 2016 Abstract: Viruses are obligatory cellular parasites. Their mission is to enter a host cell, to transfer the viral genome, and to replicate progeny whilst diverting cellular immunity. The role of ubiquitin is to regulate fundamental cellular processes such as endocytosis, protein degradation, and immune signaling. Many viruses including influenza A virus (IAV) usurp ubiquitination and ubiquitin-like modifications to establish infection. In this focused review, we discuss how ubiquitin and unanchored ubiquitin regulate IAV host cell entry, and how histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6), a cytoplasmic deacetylase with ubiquitin-binding activity, mediates IAV capsid uncoating. We also discuss the roles of ubiquitin in innate immunity and its implications in the IAV life cycle. Keywords: ubiquitin; unanchored ubiquitin; HDAC6; aggresome processing; influenza virus; virus entry; virus uncoating; innate immunity; virus–host interactions 1. Ubiquitin and Ubiquitination Ubiquitin is a small, 8.5 kDa protein composed of 76 amino acids expressed in different tissues and present in different subcellular compartments.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Regulation of the Actin-Regulatory Protein Hs1 in Tcr Signaling
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Fall 2009 Role and Regulation of the Actin-Regulatory Protein Hs1 in Tcr Signaling Esteban Carrizosa University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Cell Biology Commons, and the Immunology and Infectious Disease Commons Recommended Citation Carrizosa, Esteban, "Role and Regulation of the Actin-Regulatory Protein Hs1 in Tcr Signaling" (2009). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 91. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/91 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/91 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Role and Regulation of the Actin-Regulatory Protein Hs1 in Tcr Signaling Abstract Numerous aspects of T cell function, including TCR signaling, migration, and execution of effector functions, depend on the actin cytoskeleton. Cytoskeletal rearrangements are driven by the action of actin-regulatory proteins, which promote or antagonize the assembly of actin filaments in esponser to external cues. In this work, we have examined the regulation and function of HS1, a poorly-understood actin regulatory protein, in T cells. This protein, which becomes tyrosine phosphorylated upon T cell activation, is thought to function primarily by stabilizing existing branched actin filaments. Loss of HS1 results in unstable actin responses upon TCR engagement and defective Ca2+ responses, leading to poor activation of the IL2 promoter. TCR engagement leads to phosphorylation of HS1 at Tyr 378 and Tyr 397, creating binding sites for SH2 domain-containing proteins, including Vav1 and Itk. Phosphorylation at these residues is required for Itk-dependent recruitment of HS1 to the IS, Vav1 IS localization, and HS1-dependent actin reorganization and IL2 production.
    [Show full text]
  • Hax-1 Is Required for Rac1-Cortactin Interaction and Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Migration
    www.impactjournals.com/Genes & Cancer/ Genes & Cancer, Vol. 5 (3-4), March 2014 Hax-1 is required for Rac1-Cortactin interaction and ovarian carcinoma cell migration Rohini Gomathinayagam1,*, Muralidharan Jayaraman1,*, Ji Hee Ha1,*, Lakshmi Varadarajalu1, and Danny N. Dhanasekaran1 1 Stephenson Cancer Center and Department of Cell Biology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, OK * These Authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Danny N. Dhanasekaran, email: [email protected] Keywords: Hax-1, Rac1, cortactin, cell migration, Metastasis, Ovarian Cancer Received: April 11, 2014 Accepted: May 14, 2014 Published: May 14, 2014 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Hax-1 is a multifunctional protein, which is involved in diverse cellular signaling pathways including tumor cell survival and migration. We have shown previously that cell migration stimulated by the oncogenic G protein, G13, requires Hax-1 for the formation of a functional complex involving Gα13, Rac1, and cortactin. However, the role of Hax-1 in cancer cell migration or its role in Rac1-cortactin complex formation, which is known to be required for such migration remains to be characterized. Results focused on resolving the role of Hax-1 in ovarian cancer pathophysiology indicate that Hax-1 is overexpressed in ovarian cancer cells and the silencing of Hax-1 inhibits lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)- or fetal bovine serum-stimulated migration of these cells. In addition, silencing of Hax-1 greatly reduces Rac1-cortactin interaction and their colocalization in SKOV3 cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortactin: Coupling Membrane Dynamics to Cortical Actin Assembly
    Oncogene (2001) 20, 6418 ± 6434 ã 2001 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/onc Cortactin: coupling membrane dynamics to cortical actin assembly Scott A Weed*,1 and J Thomas Parsons2 1Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, CO 80262, USA; 2Department of Microbiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, VA 22903, USA Exposure of cells to a variety of external signals causes consists of a highly organized meshwork of ®lamentous rapid changes in plasma membrane morphology. Plasma (F-) actin closely associated with the overlying plasma membrane dynamics, including membrane rue and membrane (Small et al., 1995). In motile cells, F-actin microspike formation, fusion or ®ssion of intracellular underlies two main types of protrusive membranes; vesicles, and the spatial organization of transmembrane lamellipodia, which contain short ®laments of F-actin proteins, is directly controlled by the dynamic reorgani- linked into orthogonal arrays and ®lopodia, comprised zation of the underlying actin cytoskeleton. Two of bundled, crosslinked actin ®laments (Rinnerthaler et members of the Rho family of small GTPases, Cdc42 al., 1988). Work within the last decade has demon- and Rac, have been well established as mediators of strated that Rac and Cdc42, two members of the Rho extracellular signaling events that impact cortical actin family of small GTPases, govern lamellipodia and organization. Actin-based signaling through Cdc42 and ®lopodia formation (Hall, 1998). Cdc42 and Rac play a Rac ultimately results in activation of the actin-related pivotal role in the transmission of extracellular signals protein (Arp) 2/3 complex, which promotes the forma- that induce cortical cytoskeletal rearrangement (Zig- tion of branched actin networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortactin Overexpression Inhibits Ligand-Induced Down-Regulation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
    Research Article Cortactin Overexpression Inhibits Ligand-Induced Down-regulation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Paul Timpson,1 Danielle K. Lynch,1 Daniel Schramek,1 Francesca Walker,2 and Roger J. Daly1 1Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales and 2Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne Tumour Biology Branch, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia Abstract factor receptor signaling, thereby avoiding aberrant cellular Ligand-induced receptor down-regulation by endocytosis is a stimulation (3, 4). In brief, ligand-induced activation of the EGFR critical process regulating the intensity and duration of leads to the assembly of protein signaling complexes that relay receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Ubiquitylation of specific various biological signals. Concomitantly, recruitment of the receptor tyrosine kinases, for example, the epidermal growth endocytic machinery occurs and subsequently leads to endosomal factor receptor (EGFR) by the E3 ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl, sorting which can result in lysosomal degradation of the receptor provides a sorting signal for lysosomal degradation and leads and termination of the signal or recycling of the receptor back to to termination of receptor signaling. Cortactin, which couples the cell surface (5–8). The relative efficiency of lysosomal the endocytic machinery to dynamic actin networks, is degradation versus recycling determines the potency of EGFR signaling (9). encoded by EMS1, a gene commonly amplified in breast and head and neck cancers. One mechanism whereby cortactin The recruitment of c-Cbl, a ubiquitin ligase that directs activated overexpression contributes to tumor progression is by receptor tyrosine kinases to lysosomal degradation by tagging them enhancing tumor cell invasion and metastasis.
    [Show full text]