PARLIAMENT OF

rt

I

Its

PAHt JAMI-N I ()F IHF Rl-l'Ulll lC ()F lr('Al.ll)A o

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL ECONOMY ON THE pRoposAL By GoVERNMENT TO BORROW UP TO JPY 13.6598N (US$ 125.1M1 FROM JAPAN TNTERNATTONAL COOPERATTON AGENCY (JrCAl TO FINANCE THE I(AMPALA METROPOLITAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.

a G/ \ NW

MARCH 2018

11,'- yA 'tL lA ffi\ 1.O Introduction Rt. Hon. Speaker, Hon. Members, the Committee on National Economy considered the request by Government to borrow JPY 13.659 billion (US$125.1M) from the .Iapan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to finance the Mctropolitan Transmission System Improvement Project in accordance with Rule 175 (2) (b) of the Parliamentary Rules of Procedure.

The request was presented to this House by the Hon. Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development on 9.5.2O17 and was accordingly referred to the Committee on National Economy for consideration. o The Committee considered and scrutinized the rcquest and now begs to report. 2.O METHODOLOGY

2.L Meetings

The Committee held meetings with the following:

i. The Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development; ii. The Minister of Energy and Mineral Development; and iii. Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited.

a 2.2 Documentary review The Committee studied and made reference to the following documents

The Ministbr of Finance, Planning and Economic Development's brief on the loan request;

11 The Draft Loan Agrccmcnt bctween Japan International Cooperation (.llCA) and thc (iovernment of Uganda;

2l,P.a g e \/n-- # \$\ lll The minutes of the discussion on the preparatory survey on Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area Transmission Systems Project between

UETCL and .JICA(.J ur-rc,20 1 6) ;

IV The final report on the preparatory survey on Greater Kampala

Metropolitan Area Transmission Systems Project (Septemeber,20 16) ;

V The Final Environment Impact Assessment Report (July, 2016);

VI Final Report of the Abbreviated Resettlcment Action Plan (July, 2076); and

v1l The Projcct Implementation Plan (Ui)TCl,, April 2Ol7).

2.3 Field visits o The Committee conducted a field visit to some of the existing power substations in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area (GKMA) namely, Clock Tower, and Mukono to acccss thcir cffcctivcncss in transmitting the current and future power required in GKMA in the medium to long term.

3.O BACKGROUND Uganda s National Development Plan (NDP) puts emphasis on sustainable economic growth while aiming at poverty reduction. Electricity serves as the vital engine for accelerating economic growth. Its peak demand in the country a presently stands at about 5O0MW, which is estimated to be doubled in coming 10 years. However, the country's power generation, transmission, and distribution capacity fails to meet the growing demand, which poses serious constraints on Uganda's economic activities.

In rcsponse to thc incrcasing power demand, the Government of Uganda regards the improvemcnt of power generation an urgent issue. As a result, government has over the past decade been promoting the power generation development plan, such as hydropower, thermal and geothermal. On the other hand, the d t of transmission and distribution network is lagging

@' behind and has continued to provide negative effects to the economic development, public adminislration and peoplc.'s hves in Kampala through the unstable power supply andlor frequent planned power outages.

At present, there exists a 132kV transmission system ring in Kampala metropolitan area. However, from the power flow simulation and analysis conducted, considering the current growth rate, it was observed that the system will fundamentally lack capacity within thc medium term (10 to 15 years).

Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL) has incorporated The Kampala Metropolitan Transmission System Improvement Project in the o Grid Development Plan 2014 to 2030. The project aims at the effective use of 22O kV transmission lines for power supply to Kampala Metropolitan Area as well as improve the transmission capacity of 132kV Transmission lines and substations. The project shall meet part of the ener5/ needs of Uganda's population for social and economic development in an environmentally sustainable manner. It will also contribute to the reduction of the risk of scheduled power outage and stable power supply in the GKMA, thus the relevance of this project is considered to be high.

4.O THE PROJECT AND COUNTRY STRATEGY o The project is in line with the National Development Plan II, which is the national development policy of the Government of Uganda for the period 2OL6 - 2021. In the NDPII, "promotion of development of infrastructures" is one of critical areas of focus of thc Government in order to achieve the devclopment Soals-htglli ghted in thc plan O -.''t iNl /// \- v-aa-- .,

/" ^0ft/ 4lPage A The project is also in line with the UETCL Grid Development Plan 2014-2030 in that highlights the mid- to long-term distribution facility plan for the entire country.

The project will hence contribute to effective use of the hydroelectric power stations developed in conlormity with the cncrfX/ sector policy in order to supply power to the GKMA.

5.O PERFORMANCE OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PROJECTS There are 12 approved projects (lncluding Isimba and Karuma Hydropower Prr4ccts) that are dircctlf in-rplcmentcd by UtrTCL amounting to US$ 2.52 o billion, of which US$ 514.66 million has bccn disbursed representing a disbursement rate of 20.4oh as at 31"1 March,20 17. Howcvcr, this includes the Isimba and Karuma Hydropower Projects together with their associated transmission lines (Funded by China Exim Bank) that amounts to US$1.92 billion. The disbursement rates as at 31"t March,2OlT for Isimba HPP stood at 48.loh and that for Karuma HPP stood at 11.5%.

In addition, there are 3 projects i.e. the Kampala - power transmission line project funded by KFW from Germany, construction of 4 Industrial Parks Substations of Luzira, Mukono, Iganga and funded by China Exim Bank, and the Grid Expansion and Reinforcement Project funded by the World o Bank that had zero disburserncnts as at 31'1 Merrc.-h,2Oi7. The total amount committed for these 3 projects amount to USD$ 2O5.4 million.

6.0 PROJECT OBJECTIVE The objective of the Project is to improve transmission system in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Arca (GKMA) through construction and renovation of substations, improvement o[ transmission lines and introduction of a mobile substation. This will contribute to the improvement of power supply and eao evelopment in GKMA. sl €Etsd* nt{/- tc\ 6.1 PROJECT SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES

The project has the following specific objectives; i. To increase the existing transmission line capacity to deliver electricity to Kampala Metropolitan Arca, including the industrial park substations under construction (i.e. Mukono, Namanve and Luzira) and thc Standard Gauge Railway Traction Substations. ii. To provide adequate capacity and reliable supply to the Oil Pipeline terminal planned at . iii. To create substations that facilitate absorption of electricity generated at Karuma dam into Kampala Metropolitan Area grid. iv. To increase the Capacity of Bujagali Substation to take up o electricity generated at Isimba dam. v. To reconstruct and improve the capacity and reliability of Kawaala Substation. vi. To improvc thc rchability of Mutundwc Substation by upgrade to a double-busbar su bstation. vii. Procure a mobile substation for UETCL to improve emergency preparedness and minimize outage during maintenance of major substation equipment. 7.O PROJECT COMPONENTS

Thcprolest has the following 7 components as sh<>wn in table 1; o CL a-' N4*

a ry 6lP A

\K$r Table 1: Project components

No. Component Description Specification ,

1 Buloba Substation 22O I 132 kV Transformer 125MVA X 2 Units 132 I 33 kV Transformer 40MVAX2Units 22O kV Switchgear 1 Lot 132 kV Switchgear 1 Lot 33 kV Switchgear 1 Lot Control building 1 Building 22okn Tran smission Line Approx 0.9 km x 4cct 1 32kv Transmission Line Approx 0.8 km x2cct 2 Upgrading of I 132k-.v Switch Gcar 1 Lot Substation J Bujagali Substatton 22olr32l33kv 250MVA X lUnit Trernsformer 1 Lot 22O kV Switchgear 1 Lot 132 kV Switchgear o 4 Construction of New 22Olr32l33kv 125MVA X 3 Units Mukono Substation Transformer 1 Lot t 22O kV Gas Insulated 1 Lot Switchgear 1 Building 132 kV Gas Insulated Approx 0.3 km x 2ccL Switchgear Approx 4.2 km x 4cct Control building Approx 0.4 km x 2cct 732kv Transmission Line 5 Upgrading of Kawaala 132133 kv Transformer 40MVA X 3 Units Substation | 132111 kv Transformer 20MVA X 1 Units 132 kV Gas Insulated 1 Lot , Switchgear 1 Lot 33 kV Switchgear 1 Lot 11 kV Switchgear i Building Control building 6 Reconductoring of Mukono Branch Point Approx 25.4 krn x lcct 132kv lines Mutundwe Substation Approx 10.2 km x 2cct o Lugogo Substation Approx 5.3 km x 2cct Kawala Substation Approx 0.1 km x2cct 7 Procurement of Mobilc Mobile Substation 2OMVA X 1 Unit Substation I Source: source: iroject Implementation Plan ltniCl, lprit ZOtz 8.O PROJECT COMPONENTS AND COST

The total budgeted cost inclusive of taxes for the Kampala Metropolitan Project te) at USD 138.7 million project investment costs include: The

7 .r P, e

( I w r-)----- equrpment design, supply, ir-rsLerllation, testing, cLc; Project Management; RAP Implementation Supervision; Land Acquisition; Taxes; and Price Contingencies.

Table 2: Project components by Cost

Project Component Cost (USD million) Loan GoU Part Total Share "9"JmgI,g,t 19.5 19.5 14.loh Construction of New Buloba Substation

6.2 6.2 4.5.k Upgrading of Mutundwe Substatton

7.4 7.4 5.30k Upgrading of Bujagali Substatton

Construction of New Mukono Substation 36.6 36.6 26.4Yo Upgradrng of Kawaala Substatron 22.1 22.1 15.9o/o a Procurement of Mobile Substation 3.9 3.9 2.80h

Construction Supervisron (Consultancl ) 9.7 9.7 7 .Oo/. RAP Implementatron supervlslon 0.6 0.6 O.4o/o (Consultancy) Price Escalation (l .6% on Yen and 5.67o on 7.6 7.6 5.5% r.JGX)

Physical Contingency ( 1O%) tt.4 tt.4 8.20h Land Acquisition 2.6 2.6 l.9o/" NIiMA Lev-y (1%o of l)ro.1ect Cost) 1.3 1.3 o.9"k NFA Biodiversity offset at Nandagi 1.5 1.5 1.10k CF'R(Estrmate) UETCL Administration Cost 2.5 2.5 l.goh Revaluatrons o.5 0.5 o.40h vAT (18%) 4.6 4.6 3.3o/. o Tax on Land Transfer 0.1 0.1 O.lo/o Interr:st dunng constru<'tron 1 0.i 0.1 o.10k Other Costs (Utrlrtl' Connectrons,'l'cmporan, 0.5 O.4%o 0.5 Access Diversion of utilitres Total Project Costs 125.1 13.6 138.7 100% Source: Project Implementation Plan (UETCL, April 2OL7l, DRS & PBO Computations Table 2 shows that the construction of new substations (Buloba & Mukono) will cost 40.4% (USD 56.1 million) of the project cost followed by the upgrading of cxis,ting substations (Kawaala, tsujagair & Mutundwc) at 25.7o/o (USD 35.7 \ -.' million 8.2% of the project cos -% 11.4 million) will be spent on physical

Page ct {4 i ^K/( contingencies, 5.5%o of the project costs (USD 7.6 million) will be spent on price contingencres,T.4oh (USD iO.3 million) on Consultancy services for construction and RAP supervisions ,3.4oh (USD 4.7 million) on taxes,l.9oh (USD 2.6 miltion) on land acquisition, 2.8oh (USD 3.9 million) on procurement of a mobile substation , 1.8oh (USD 2.5 million) on UETCL project staff and O.sVo (USD 0.35 million) on Public Awareness Campaign & Outreach.

9.O PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

The project will be implemented by the Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL). A project implementation unit will be established using the existing functional structure of the organization. a The overall time for the completion of the project , after procurement of consultant for Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Tendering and Project Management and ending with the commissioning of the project plant is estimated to be about 5.5 years including the Defect Liability Period (DLP) (2 years).

1O.O ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL RATE OF RETURN

Based on the Project Preparatory Survey report, the Economic and Financial Internal Rates of Return (EIRR/FIRR) for the project are estimated at 40.8 percent and 13.2 percent respectively. o 11.O LOAN TERMS, CONDITIONS AND BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS 1 1. 1 LOAN TERMS.

Government of Uganda will obtain a loan of JPY 13.659 Billion (USD 125.1 Million) from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) to implement the Kqmrqala Metropolitan'lransmission System Improvement Project. Table 3 p'lftrws loan terms

t\t'L 9lPage NW 7q v Table 3: Loan Terms ITEM TERMS Loan amount JPY 13.659 Billion_lU,qD_ 125.1 Million) Maturi Period 40 ars Repayment Period 30 Years Interest rate O.Olo/o a on disbursed and outstan amount Source: Draft Loan Agreement between GoU and JICA

Tablc 3 shows that an inlcrcst raLe of O.O7o/u will bc applied on the amount of money drawn down (disburscd) by Lhe.JICA during the gracc period. Therefore, the interest cost of the loan at 0.01% per annum on the loan outstanding and disbursed is lower than the standard discount rate used of 5o/o o recommended by IMF and World Bank.

LL.z LEVEL OF CONCESSIONALITY OF THE LOAN

Table 4: Level of concessionality of the loan Item Levell Amount/Rate Maturity 40 years Grace period 10 years Present value of the loan(PV) JPY 4.32 billion Total Debt Senrice of the loan .IPY 13.69 billion Grant Element (%l '!i" 68% Discount Rate 5% interest'rate" Source: Draft Loan Agreement between GoU and JICA and PBO Computations o From table 4 above, the present discounted vaiues of the loan from JICA is smaller than the nominal value of the loan contracted at JPY 13.659 billion. This implies that the toterl future payment of the loans is cheaper than the proposed amount to be borrowed in present terms. The total future payment of thc loan r,,,ill amount to JPY 13.69 billion after thc loan period of 40 years

from JICA is concessional, since its grant element (68%) is large r than the shold of 35oh, recommended by IMF/World Bank t

lPage NtL k s 11.3 CONDITIONS TO LOAN EFFECTIVENESS

In addition to the entry into force of the loan agreement by the submission to .JICA of the Attorney (ieneral's legal Opinion on the legal validity of the loan documentation to the Government, the following conditions are attached to the loans; i. A Copy of a duly passed Resolution of approving the borrowing; and ii. An evidence of authority for the person(s)who will make, sign and deliver documents necessary for the implementation of the loan agreement, together with an authenticated specimen signature of each such person. o 11.3 BUDGETARY IMPLICATION

The project is included in the FY 20L7 l18 approved budget under vote 017- Ministry of Energr and Mineral Development with Government of Uganda contribution of Ushs 1.77 blllion towards Engineering and Design Studies for capital works and an external finance provision of Ushs 23.5 billion towards Machinery and Equipmenl.

Lz,O THE LOAN AND THE CURRENT DEBT SITUATION OF THE COUNTRY

This loan will increase the country's public debt that has been on the rise over the years. As at end of June, 2OL7 the public debt stood at Ushs 34,409.83 o billion, which is equivalent to 38oh of GDP. The external debt amounted to Ushs 22,358.63 billion w'hilc lhe domestic dcbl amountcd to Ushs 12,051.2 bittion. The External debt exposure stood at US$ 17.37 billion equivalent to 43.3o/oolGDP, of which US$ 6.23 billion was outstanding and disbursed, while

l US$ 5.15 billion was committed but undisbursed \-

\TL tF\ 11 lPage 4 o

N At the end of June, 2077, the PV of public sector debt to GDP stood al27 .1o/o, the PV of external public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) debt to GDP stood at 14.4oh while the present value of domestic debt to GDP stood at 13.19o/o.

13.O OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Thc Committec made thc following obscrvations and recommendations

1. Development process of generation and transmission projects. The committee observed the slow realrzation of electricity infrastructure projects particularly in the gencration and transmission segments. While some a progrcss has been rcgistcrcd on the mini-hydros, large projects tend to take too long in the development phase.

Recommendation:

The committee recommends that Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development and UETCL, should accelerate the development process of projects in the generation and transmission segments in order to attract long-term financing in the electricity sector.

ll Low Disbursement rates among UETCL debt financed Projects. The committee noted the low average disbursements (2O.4%) of direct UETCL Loans against Origrnal Project lifetime as aL 3l"t March 2017. The low e disbursement rates are attributed to poor project preparedness of UETCL especially through lack of detailed project feasibility studies, lengthy procurement process for goods and services, lack of sites for contractors to start the works, delays in government counterpart funds, and delays in compensa ns of Project Affected Persons (PAPs), among others (

NL 1 12 lPagr: ,ff

ftr"".--, r$h Recommendation:

The committee recommends government should ensure that all proposed electricity infrastructure projects presented before Cabinet should be scrutinized to ensure that preparatory phases such as feasibility studies, Compensation of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) have been carried before they are further submitted to Parliament for their approval.

llt. Government Counterpart Funding. The committee noted that Government enters into financing agrcements with various dcvclopment partners, in which it commits to provide counterpart funding through various implementing agencies. Among the lessons learnt from the implementation of projects o especially those financed by externally borrowed funds, is the insufficient and untimely release of government counterpart funding and the low absorption capacities of project implementing agencies. Government will contribute USD 13.6 Million towards the tmpicmentation of this project.

Recommendation:

The Committee recommends that Government ensures that adequate counterpart funds for this project are timely integrated into the national budget during the project implementation period. The committee further recommends that the Sectoral Parliamentary committees should critically examine the budgets of MDAs that are beneficiaries of externally borrowed o funds to ensure that the budgets of the MDAs explicitly provide for all the required counterpart funds during that financial year for the projects that are under their implementation.

iv. High dependence on consultancies. Thc committee observed the high dependency on consultancy services in conducting feasibility studies and designing transmission lines projects by UETCL despite their successful 1m ntation of several electricity transmission prolects There has been \ t-, NlfU s re slow progress in translating this success into building sufficient capacttres within UETCL in condncting feasibility studics and designing clectricity transmission projects. For this projectT.4o/o of the total project costs (USD 10.3 million) will finance the procurement of Consultancy services for construction and RAp supervisions. The over dependency on consultancies posses an agency risk especially where the consultant objectives end up not coinciding with UETCL objectives, which tends to cause delays in project implementation'

Recommendation:

The committee recommends that UETCL scales up plans for building the capacity of UETCL staff especially in conducting feasibility studies and O designing electricity transmission projects in order to cut down on the exorbitant amounts of project funds spent on consultancy serrrices towards conducting feasibility studies and designing transmission projects.

v procurement. The Committee observed the construction and consultancy by firms to be financed under the loan/ or the GoU/UETCL will be awarded contracts in accordancc' with the PPDA rcgulations or the financier's rcgulations, u,hichcvcr is applicable. However, dcbt financed infrastructure projects in Ugand a are faced with procurement bottlenecks including lengthy o bidding that have continued to negatively affect the timely implementation of electricity transmission projects. Administrative reviews also prolong the procurements when bidclcrs arc not satisficd or if they fccl that they have been treated unfairy. tw7 Recommendation: The committee recommends that government should strictly undertake process for debt financed projects ahead of time prior -!_[e procurement arliamentary approval. In addition, the ongoing process of amending I

lPage cb i" a. N{- \\s\ ( the PPDA Act, 2OO3 should be fast tracked by Government in order to further address the existing inefficiencies in the Procurement cycle and promote value of debt financed projects.

vl. Plan for Using Local Contractors, Equipment and Materials. The Committee notcd that the skilled labor and rcgular workers for the construction and rn,ork for substation facilitrcs, civil works, buildings and transmission lines for the Project can be ordered with local contractors, local contractors will be hired for the Project implementation plan.

The committee further notes that the aggregate, cement, rebar and other matcrials to bc uscd in Lhc civil wc-rrks aurd irr construction and upgrading o of new and existing substations and foundation work for the transmission towers can be purchased locally, equipment and materials will to be purchased locally to the extent possible in this Project. However, most of substation facilities and transmission equipment and materials for the scale equivalent to the project to be procured are not manufactured in the

country and thus thcl, '67i11 be procured from .Japan or third countries in consideration of past introduction of the existing facilities and Operation & Maintenance capacity of UECTL.

Recommendation: o The committee recommends that government develops technical skill transfer programs in all projects contracted to foreign companies to facilitate development of a critical mass of local skilled labour to be used to maintain the established infrastructure. In this case the consultant should provide onsite training /knowledge transfer to UET.CL/REA counterpart project engineers on the various supervision s of electricity transmission line at no additional cost. cb

15 e ^/y- tr rFh Where local capacity exists in the production of inputs to any public project, government should support local producers in meeting quality and other specifications required for supply to the projects.

vii. Environmental and Social Issues. The Committee noted that a detailed ESIA study for the project was conducted and approved by NEMA. The ESIA report outlined the ecological and social issues that have to be monitored during project implementation.

Recommendation: The committee recommends that UETCL should strictly ensure that the negative environmental impacts in the ESIA O document are timely mitigated in accordance with NEMA requirements and other international requirements.

viii. RAP Implementation and Supenzision. lhe Committee noted that the RAP study was prepared to establish the basis for compensation of Project Affected Persons for property that will be lost in the corridor for the proposed Overhead Transmission Line (OHTL). The implementation of the RAP will involve disclosure to groups and individuals. The Resettlement Action Plan valuation report shall be publicly disclosed in Kampala at UETCL officcs and at cach affected district hcadquarters for review. Por PAPs who raise objections, the grievances will be referred to the grievance a committee set for the project to deal with complaints on compensation. Experiences from similar projects have exhibited continued delays associated with payments to Project Affected Persons (PAPs) especially to tKose lapd owners that have agreed to the valued com rates ,,/

Nru & I 15 I l) e

w *---- \F\- Recommendation: The committee recommends that In accordance with Uganda's compensation and resettlement requirements, the Project Affected Persons (PAPsf should be compensated in a timely and adequate manner in order to guard against the implementation delays for this project that might arise due to poor RAP implementation.

8.O CONCLUSTON

The Committee recommends that the request by Government to borrow JPY 13.659 billion (US$l25.lM) from the Japan International Cooperation Agency O (JICA) to finance the Kampala Metropolitan Transmission System Improvement

Prq CC approvcd subjt't'1 to Lhc rccommcndaLions hcrcin

I Ct w o Ng/

lTlPage \€tr REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL ECONOMY ON THE pRoposAL BY GOVERNMENT TO BORROW UP TO JPY 13.6598N (US$ 125.1M1 FROM JAPAN TNTERNATTONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICAI TO FINANCE THE I(AMPALA METROPOLITAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.

Io I reuIB CONSTITUENCY 1 Hon. Bbumba Syda Namirembe Nakaseke North CountY clP 2 Hon. Bategeka Lawrence V/CP Hoima MunicipalitY

3 Hon. Tayebwa Thomas Ruhinda North

Hon. Muyanja Johnson SenYonga Mukono South Countv

5 Hon. Kamara John NrnzeYtmerna Bufumbira North

6 Hon. Kalule Sengo Emmanuel Gomba East CountY

7 Hon. Igeme Nathan Nabeta Jinja Municipality

8 llon. Migadde Robert Ndugwa Bur,,uma Islands County

9 Hon. Okello AnthonY Kioga County n>-, i0 Hon. Musoke Paul Sebulime Buiinve County North

11 Hon. Kibalya Henry Moris Bugabula South

; Hon. Guma Gumisiriza David Ibanda North Cottntv t3 Hon. Nambeshe John BaPtist rvfanjiva Countr,

l4 Hon. Ikojo John Bosco Bukedea County (-' 15 Hon. Angura Fredrick Tororo South CountY

16 Hon. Katoto Hatwib Katerera County

77 Hon. Amero Susan Amuria Woman Rep

18 lPage r W {o NAME CONSTITUENCY SIGNATURE 18 Hon. Mandera Amos Buyamba CountY

19 Hon. Babirye Judith Builnve Woman ReP

20 Hon Scguya l. John Bosco Mawokota CounLY South

21 Hon.Anne Mary Tumwrne Ntoroko Woman ReP

22 Hon.Katwesirye Oliver KoYekYenga Buhweju Woman ReP

23 Hon.Akamba Paul Busiki

24 Hon.Adeke Anna Ebaju National Female Youth

Hon.Nauwat RosemarY Amudat Woman ReP

26 Hon.Atiku Bernard Ayrrru county

27 Hon.Lakot Oruni Susan (caPt) UPDF

28 Ilon. Jack Wameinga Wamar Mberlc Municipality

29 Hon. William Nzoghu Busongora North

30 Hon. Herbert Edmund Ariko Soroti MunicipalitY lr*

31 Hon. Jimmy Akena Lira Municipality

32 Hon.Nargaga Mariam DWR Ner-muLurnbai

e Hon.Ayepa Michael Labwor County

34 Hon.Lokeris Samson Dodoth East

35 Hon.Kajara Aston Mwenge South

lglPage