DOCSLIB.ORG

Korea Gas Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Korea Gas Corporation ● Established in Aug 1983, pursuant to ‘Korea Gas Corporation Act’ ● Korean Government holds stakes of 54.56% - Korean Government(26.15%), KEPCO(20.47%) and Local Governments(7.93%) ● Listed on Korea Stock Exchange(KSE) in Dec 1999 Korean Gov. Commitment to KOGAS KOGAS’ Operational & Financial Excellence (As of April, 2018) KOGAS Act Strong Ties with the Government Critical Role of KOGAS in Korea Founded in August 1983, pursuant Direct and indirect Gov. ownership Korea’s only fully-integrated natural gas to the Korea Gas Corporation Act 54.56% provider holding monopolistic position Gov. participated in capital increase Mandates KOGAS the monopolistic Imports approximately 88% of Korea’s position in Korean LNG market (Nov. 2013) demand for LNG Reinstatement of the Cost Pass- Owns and operates nationwide pipeline Through System and guaranteed profit network and storage tanks by Gov. Secures resources through overseas oil & gas projects Domestic Business Overseas(E&P) Business Stable Profitability Growth Opportunity Supply of LNG Purchasing Construction & Exploration and Production(E&P) rd Natural Gas - World 3 Operation of LNG Mozambique, Iraq, Myanmar, etc. - City Gas and largest LNG buyer Storage Tanks생 and - Engines for Business Expansion & Growth Power Sector Nationwide산 Pipelines - Monopoly ● Importing 88% of Korea’s natural gas demands ● 15 Long-term(20 to 25 years) contracts in 10 countries, mixed with ST, MT, spot ● Various efforts to diversify supplier, contract duration, pricing mechanism Qatar (3) 러시Sakhalin(1)아 사할린(1) 4.92MM tons/yr 1.5MM tons/yr The United States(1) 2.1MM tons/yr 2.8MM tons/yr 2MM tons/yr Malaysia(2) Yemen(1) 2MM tons/yr 2MM tons/yr 2MM tons/yr LNG Import 브Brunei(1)루나이(1) (Unit: thousand tons) Oman(1) 1.0MM tons/yr 4MM tons/yr 인Indonesia(2)도네시아(3) 1MM tons/yr Portfolio(2) 0.7MM tons/yr 3.6MM tons/yr Australia(1)호주(4) 2 MM tons/yr 3.5MM tons/yr ● Currently operating 72 storage tanks in 4 LNG receiving terminals (storage capacity of 5.23mmton, 11.47mmkl) ● Nationwide pipeline network (4,790km) managed by 397 stations Existing Terminals (As of Dec ‘17) Samcheok Incheon Pyeongtaek Tongyeong Samcheok Total Incheon Start-up 1996 1986 2002 2014 – Pyeongtaek No. of Tanks 20 23 17 12 72 CAPEX Forecast* Tongyeong (in KRW bn) • Main pipeline - Additional 261km will be added reaching a total grid 5,051km (3,139 mile) by 2021 • Terminals - Incheon expansion(#21~23tanks) : Oct ’15 ~ Jul ’20 (0.2mmkl x 3) - Jeju : 2 tanks are under construction(0.045mmkl x 2, Feb. ‘17~Aug. 19) * Source : FY18 ~ 20 based on the mid-long term financial management plan approved by the government in Sep. 2017(total capex) ● 24 Projects in 13 countries (as of March, 2018) (3 Exploration, 9 Development/Production, 8 LNG Liquefaction/Receiving, 4 Downstream) ● Operating 2 Projects (Iraq Akkas, Mozambique Maputo Pipeline) Exploration (3) Development/Production(9) LNG Project (8) Downstream (4) Project Overview Performance Additional Well and More Production • 2010 : Startup of commercial operation • Production Volume : Total 6.5 billion barrels • Partner : ENI • 2017 OP : 152billion Korean won • Contract Type : TSC (Technical Service Contract) • 1Q 2018 OP : 22 billion Korean won 2017 In bn 1Q Difference Full KRW 2018(A) 1Q(B) (A-B, %) Year Revenue 80 108 485 -28(-25.9%) OP 22 31 152 -9(-29.0%) NI 18 29 139 -11(-37.9%) • Average production : 420kbbl/d (1Q 2017) → 430kbbl/d (1Q 2018) Project Overview Performance • Production Volume : Total 670 million barrels • Sep 2014 : Startup of commercial operation (more than 115,000bbl/d at least for 7 years (production : 15,000bbl/d) during 20 years of production period) • 2017 OP : 11.8 billion won • Partners : Gazprom, Petronas, TPAO • 1Q 2018 OP : 5 billion won • Contract Type : TSC(Technical Service Contract) (1Q 2018 Avg 78,000bbl/d) ※ Consistent increase in production will generate incremental operating profit 1Q 2017 Difference (In bn won) 2018 (A) (A-B) 1Q(B) Full Year Revenue 85.1 63.6 284.4 21.5(33.8%) OP 5.1 11.8 21.2 -6.7(-56.8%) NI 5.6 12.4 -75.3 -6.8(-54.8%) Project Overview Performance • Total of 23 exploration wells drilled • Nov 2013 : Startup of Commercial production • Development of gas field and construction of pipeline • 2017 OP : 46 billion won : Aug ’09 ~ Jul ’13 • 1Q 2018 OP : 17 billion won • Production period : Jul ’13 ~ ’38 2017 1Q Difference In bn won Full 2018(A) 1Q(B) (A-B,%) Scope of Business Stake Year Gas field Production, Marketing, Operation 8.5% (offshore gas field) Revenue 25 21 75 4(19.0%) Offshore Construction and Operation 8.5% 17 4(30.1%) pipeline (Approx.110km) OP 13 46 Onshore Construction and Operation 4.17% pipeline (Approx. 800km) NI 17 13 46 4(30.1%) • Gas Field & offshore pipeline : Posco Daewoo(51%), OVL(17%), MOGE(15%), GAIL(8.5%) • Onshore pipeline : CNPC(50.9%), Posco Daewoo%), MOGE(7.37%), OVL(8.35%), GAIL(4.17%) Project overview Performance Gas Field Browse Basin, 475km offshore of Broome, Western Australia • Made a Final Investment Decision in March 2012 Production Design Capacity 3.6MMton/year - Develop Prelude/Concerto gas into a floating LNG facility Condensate 1.3MMton/year • World’s first FLNG development project LPG 0.4MMton/year • Made an SPA regarding 360,000 tons Participants KOGAS 10%, Shell 67.5%(Operator), • Expect first commercial production from 3Q 2018 Inpex 17.5%, CPC 5% and generate an operating income from 2019 ✽ CAPEX status and forecasts (Unit : US$Million) FY ~2014 2015 2016 2017 2018(E) Total Amount 1,169 193 164 196 159 1,881 Project Overview Plan • Development of Surgil Gas Field, and Sales of Gas and • Oct 2015 : Construction of Chemical Plant Completed Chemical Products • • Products : HDPE* 0.38Mtpa, PP 0.08Mtpa, Feb 2016 : Startup of commercial operation Methane2.5Mtpa • Equity Method gains of W40bn in 2017 * HDPE(High Density Polyethylene), PP(poly propylene) • Equity Method gains of W14.8bn in 1Q 2018 • Reserves : Surgil gas field 97BCM(71MMton) “We expect to make annual average earnings • Partners : UNG 50%, Kor-Uz Gas Chemical Investment *50% * KOGAS 22.5%, Lotte Chemical 24.5%, GS E&R 3% of 50 billion won in this project until 2041” * Brent price assumption : $45/bbl with annual average increase of 1.9% * BCM (Billion Cubic Meter) : 1BCM=0.73MMton of LNG <Business Flow Chart> Project Overview Plan • Terms of contract : 2007 ~ 2053 • Plans to develop each field one by one for entering commercial • Partners : KOGAS 10%, Galp 10%, ENH 10% stage EEA 70% - (Coral FLNG) Made a final investment decision(FID) at June 2017 * EEA : Eni/Exxon Mobile 35.7% respectively, CNPC 28.57 - (Mamba LNG) Working on FID in 2019, plans to enter • Gas initially in Place : Approx. 85 Tcf commercial production in 2024 (expected) - (Mamba Project) Area 1 and 4 straddling project, Co-development between participants of two areas Coral field (C1) Mamba field (M2) Mamba structure (M1-1, M1-2, M1-3) Agulha structure (A1) Project Overview • Area : 12,523 km2 (southeastern offshore of Cyprus) • Terms of contract : 2013 ~ 2018 • Partners : KOGAS 20%, ENI 80% (operator) • Gas initially in Place : Approx. 2.77 Tcf • Major activities - May 2012 : Exploration and Production Sharing Contract - Jan 2014 : 2D(7,086 km2), 3D(4,744 km2 ) seismic aq. - Mar 2015 : 2 exploration wells drilled Plan • Amendment of contract to extend the terms of contract to Jan 2019 • 1 exploration well remaining for commitment in 2018 Project Overview Performance • Sep 24, 2015 : 1st cargo loaded Gas Field Arcadia, Fairview, Roma, and • Oct 27, 2015 : 1st cargo discharged at PyeongTaek Scotia Gas Field in the East Australia • May 27, 2016 : Train 2 production started Proven 5.4 Tcf (101 MMton) Reserves • 1Q 2018 OP : 14 billion won (19 cargos) Liquefaction Design Capacity 7.8MMton/year ✽1 cargo : about 66,000 tons Plant (3.9MMton/year x 2 Trains) u Technology of CBM development being optimized Participants KOGAS 15%, Santos 30%(Operator), Petronas 27.5%, Total 27.5% 2017 1Q Difference In bn won Full 2018(A) 1Q(B) (A-B) Year Revenue 110 95 436 15(15.8%) 25 OP 14 -11 -21 (convert into OP) NI -11 -28 -997* 17(60.7%) Project Overview • Area : 180 km2 (Horn River), 394 km2 (Westcut Bank) • Terms of contract : ’10~ Horn River basin • Partners : KOGAS 50%, EnCana 50% (operator) • Resources (2P+2C) : 871 Bcf (HR), 691 Bcf (WC) • Feb 2010 : Farm-in contract • 34 horizontal wells drilled and hydraulic fractured • Cumulative production : eq. 1.4MM ton of LNG (end 2017) Plan • Adjust development plan in line with Market situation and progress of Canada LNG project u Conduct R&D activities on enhancing productivity of shale gas Glaser et al. (2013) Various productivity in a shale gas play with area and formation 1 9 Engineering factors of hydraulic fracturing ↓ Optimization ↓ Productivity partly enhanced 2 0 Geological, geochemical, geomechanical factors ↓ Sweet spotting ↓ Productivity significantly enhanced 2 1 Procedure of sweet spotting on Shale Gas Forecast fracturing efficiency & sweet spot in shale gas reservoir Optimizatoin of drilling path in shale gas reservoir Forecast fracturing efficiency & sweet spot in shale gas reservoir .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company EUR 750,000,000 2.625 Per Cent
    MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company EUR 750,000,000 2.625 per cent. Notes due 2023 Issue Price: 99.214 per cent. The EUR 750,000,000 2.625 per cent. Notes due 2023 (the Notes) are issued by MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company (the Issuer or MOL). Unless previously redeemed or cancelled, the Notes will be redeemed at their principal amount on 28 April 2023 (the Maturity Date). The Notes will bear interest from and including 28 April 2016 (the Issue Date) at the rate of 2.625 per cent. per annum. Interest on the Notes will be payable annually in arrear on 28 April in each year, commencing on 28 April 2017 . Payments on the Notes will be made in euro. The Issuer may, at its option, redeem all, but not some only, of the Notes at any time at par plus accrued interest, in the event of certain tax changes as described under Condition 7.2 (Redemption for Taxation Reasons). A holder of Notes may, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control as described in Condition 7.3 (Redemption at the option of the Noteholders), require the Issuer to redeem the Notes at par plus accrued interest. The Notes mature on 28 April 2023. This prospectus (the Prospectus) has been approved by the Central Bank of Ireland, as competent authority under Directive 2003/71/EC (which includes the amendments made by Directive 2010/73/EU) (the Prospectus Directive). Such approval relates only to Notes which are to be admitted to trading on a regulated market for the purposes of Directive 2004/39/EC and/or which are to be offered to the public in any Member State of the European Economic Area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Gas Corridor
    Energy July 2013 THE SOUTHERN GAS CORRIDOR The recent decision of The State Oil Company of The EU Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) and its consortium identified the development of a Southern Gas partners to transport the Shah Deniz gas through Corridor to supply Europe with gas from Caspian Southern Europe via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) and Middle Eastern sources as one of the EU’s is a key milestone in the creation of the Southern “highest energy securities priorities”. Azerbaijan, Gas Corridor. Turkmenistan, Iraq and Mashreq countries (as well as in the longer term, when political conditions This Briefing examines the origins, aims and permit, Uzbekistan and Iran) were identified development of the Southern Gas Corridor, including as partners which the EU would work with to the competing proposals to deliver gas through it. secure commitments for the supply of gas and the construction of the pipelines necessary for its Background development. It was clear from the Action Plan that the EU wanted increased independence from In 2007, driven by political incidents in gas supplier Russia. The EU Commission President José Manuel and transit countries, and the dependence by some Barroso stated that the EU needs “a collective EU Member States on a single gas supplier, the approach to key infrastructure to diversify our European Council agreed a new EU energy and energy supply – pipelines in particular. Today eight environment policy. The policy established a political Member States are reliant on just one supplier for agenda to achieve the Community’s core energy 100% of their gas needs – this is a problem we must objectives of sustainability, competitiveness and address”.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    ANNUAL REPORT 2010 Annual Creportontent 2010 s 1 2 Key performance indicators 92 board of directors and management board 4 message to shareholders 92 Governing bodies structure of JsC Gazprom Neft 9 highlights 93 Membership of the Board of Directors 100 Membership of the Management Board 12 development strategy 105 Total compensation for members of Board 18 Company history of Directors and Management Board 20 Company structure 22 Geography of operations 106 environment and innovations 26 Competitive state of the company 106 Environmental protection and safety 114 Innovation activity 31 company Key performance indicators by type of operation 119 energy and energy saving in 2010 31 Oil and gas exploration and production 122 social responsibility 41 Oil refining and regional policy 45 Production of petroleum products 122 Personnel, occupational safety, and health 46 Sales of petroleum products management 48 Premium business segments 127 Social responsibility in areas of operations 52 Export of crude oil and petroleum products 129 to shareholders and investors 54 analysis of the company’s 129 Authorised capital shareholder capital financial results of activity structure by the management 130 Share market and capitalisation 54 Definitions and recalculation methodology 132 Participation in the Depositary Receipt 54 Forecast statements Program 55 Key performance indicators for 2008–2010 134 Dividend history 56 Key financial and performance indicators 135 Observing the Corporate Code of Conduct 57 Result of activities for 2010 compared to 2009 138 asset management and 57 Production segments corporate structure 58 Changes in structure of the group 60 Performance indicators and analysis 140 credit ratings and debt portfolio 66 Results of activities management 76 Financial appendices 140 Credit rating 77 Financial indicators 141 Debt obligations 78 Additional information 142 glossary of Key terms 84 investment program and definitions 86 Key risK factors 145 appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report for First Quarter of 2021
    Квартални извештај за први квартал 2021. године QUARTERLY REPORT FOR FIRST QUARTER OF 2021 1 NIS Group The Quarterly Report for First Quarter of 2021 presents a factual overview of NIS Group’s activities, development and performance in first three months of 2020. The Report covers and presents data for NIS Group, comprising NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad and its subsidiaries. If the data pertain only to certain individual subsidiaries or only NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad, it is so noted in the Report. The terms: ‘NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad’ and ‘the Company’ denote the parent company NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad, whereas the terms ‘NIS’ and ‘NIS Group’ pertain to NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad with its subsidiaries. The Quarterly Report for first quarter of 2021 is compiled in Serbian, English and Russian. In case of any discrepancy, the Serbian version shall be given precedence. The Quarterly Report for First Quarter of 2021 is also available online on the corporate website. For any additional information on NIS Group, visit the corporate website www.nis.eu. 2 Quarterly Report For First Quarter Of 2021 Contents Contents .........................................................................................................................................3 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................4 Business report ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Highlights ........................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Petroleum Corp. and Cooperations with Nocs and Iocs
    NOC-IOC Forum Enhancing Global Energy Security through Cooperation and Partnership 30-31 March, 2009 - Kuwait Turkish Petroleum Corp. and Cooperations with NOCs and IOCs Mehmet UYSAL President & CEO TPAO TPAO: Turkish National Oil Company since 1954 • Reserve: ~ 1 billion boe • 2P Reserve: ~ 9 billion boe • Current Production: ~ 80.000 boe/d • E&P experience over 50 years • Recent Offshore Discoveries • Intense Deep Offshore Exploration Activities • Focus: Middle East, North Africa,Caspian Region and South America • Target: E&P Growth, Transportation & Retail Expansion • Current Cash Flow: $ 2,2 billion • 5 year E&P Investments (2004-08): $ 3.54 billion Energy Corridor and CEYHAN Ceyhan OIL GAS LNG Ceyhan Energy Hub BLUENABUCCOBTCSAMSUNTURKMENISTANWESTERNTURKEYIRANKERKTURKEY PIPELINE USTREAM–K ISTURKEY- -–GREECE INCEYHAN PIPELINECEYHAN BETWEEN - 1 PIPELINE-– ITALY THEPIPELINEPIPELINE IRANPIPELINE PRODUCERS INTERCONNECTORPIPELINE AND CONSUMERS, SCP PIPELINE BLUEARAPIRAQLNG (NIGERIA STREAM–GASTURKEYTHEREFORE PIPELINE -2ALGERIA) PROJECT PIPELINE IT IS A NATURAL BRIDGE. Bottlenecks of transportation : 1 Million b/d 3 Million b/d 17 Million b/d 1 Million b/d 12 Million b/d 4 Million b/d 3 Million b/d 6,5 – 7 Million barrel of oil will be marketed via Turkey. NOC’s and IOC’s Oil & Gas Reserves and Daily Productions Oil Reserves Oil Production Billion Barrel EI TOP 100 : 1.059,4 (%86) World Reserve: 1.237,9 2008- EI TOP 100 COMPANIES Natural Gas Reserves Natural Gas Production Tcm EI TOP 100 : 120 (%68) World Reserve: 177,4 Source: BP Statistical Review 2008 , EI Top 100 Companies (2008) Cooperations in BLACK SEA PETROBRAS %50 TPAO %50 Exploration Blocks EXXONMOBIL %50 TPAO %50 Exploration Blocks TPAO %13,5 Expl.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Sanctions
    Iran Sanctions Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs July 9, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS20871 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) Summary Iran is subject to a wide range of U.S. sanctions, restricting trade with, investment, and U.S. foreign aid to Iran, and requiring the United States to vote against international lending to Iran. Several laws and Executive Orders extend sanctions to foreign companies that do business with Iran, as part of an effort to persuade foreign firms to choose between the Iranian market and the much larger U.S. market. A formal U.S. effort to curb international energy investment in Iran began in 1996 with the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA). No firms have been sanctioned under it and the precise effects of that law on energy investment in Iran—as separate from other factors affecting international firms’ decisions on whether to invest in Iran—has been unclear. While international pressure on Iran to curb its nuclear program has increased the hesitation of many major foreign firms to invest in Iran’s energy sector, hindering Iran’s efforts to expand oil production beyond 4.1 million barrels per day, some firms continue to see opportunity in Iran. This particularly appears to be the case for companies in Asia that appear eager to fill the void left by major European and American firms and to line up steady supplies of Iranian oil and gas. ISA was first passed at a time of tightening U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration & Production
    Photo: Ferenc Bibó-Szurkos, Production coordinator, South Hungary Production MOL EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE 2018 MOL GROUP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE – 2018 Photo: Branislav Herchl CONTENT I. MOL GROUP UPSTREAM 2018 II. KEY ACHVIEVEMENTS IN 2017 AND THE 2018 OUTLOOK III. SCHEDULE OF EXPLORATION AND APPRAISAL WELLS IV. LICENCE INFORMATION V. DETAILED WORK PROGRAMS IN 2017 / 2018 V/. HUNGARY V/. CROATIA V/. PAKISTAN V/. UNITED KINGDOM V/. RUSSIA V/. NORWAY V/. KURDISTAN V/. KAZAKHSTAN V/. OTHER COUNTRIES VI. GLOSSARY MOL GROUP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE – 2018 I. MOL GROUP UPSTREAM 2018 2017 PRODUCTION (mboepd)¹ TOTAL: 107 2P RESERVE CHANGES IN 2017 (MMboe)4 CEE MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA CIS NORTH SEA RESERVES (31.12.2016) AFRICA 459 PRODUCTION 2017 Y/E 2P RESERVES (MMboe)² TOTAL: 356 (38) CEE CIS NEW NORTH SEA BOOKINGS 2 MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA AFRICA REVISIONS (69) TOTAL 2017 CAPEX (USD mn)³ TOTAL: 346 CEE PURCH./SALE OF MINERALS NORTH SEA IN PLACE 1 MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA AFRICA RESERVES CIS PRODUCTION (31.12.2017) 356 EXPLORATION 1 Including JVs and Associates (Baitex: 6.2 mboepd, Pearl: 2.4 mboepd) 2 Including JVs and Associates (Baitex: 47.2 MMboe, UGL: 23.5 MMboe) 3 Excluding JVs and Associates (Baitex: 23.8 USD mn, UGL: 1.5 USD mn, Pearl: 0.2 USD mn) 4 Including JVs and Associates (Baitex: 47.2 MMboe, UGL: 23.5 MMboe) 2 MOL GROUP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE – 2018 3 II. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2017 AND THE 2018 OUTLOOK In MOL Upstream continued to pursue ecient Moving forward the Upstream business will remain 1 operations, by maintaining low unit direct a key pillar of the integrated business model of MOL 2017/2018 PRODUCTION (mboepd) production cost and disciplined CAPEX spending Group in line with the strate.
    [Show full text]
  • Kick Off MMU December
    Forward looking statements This presentation material contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and These forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and are, by uncertainties. In some cases, we use words such as "ambition", "continue", "could", "estimate", their nature, subject to significant risks and uncertainties because they relate to events "expect", "focus", "likely", "may", "outlook", "plan", "strategy", "will", "guidance" and similar and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors expressions to identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those historical fact, including, among others, statements regarding future financial position, results of expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including levels of industry operations and cash flows; changes in the fair value of derivatives; future financial ratios and product supply, demand and pricing; price and availability of alternative fuels; currency information; future financial or operational portfolio or performance; future market position and exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations; the political and economic policies of Norway conditions; business strategy; growth strategy; future impact of accounting policy judgments; and other oil-producing countries; EU directives; general economic conditions; political sales, trading and market strategies; research and development
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Exploration? What Drives Turkey¶S Intensified Offshore : Ωϭοϭϣϟ΍Ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Oil and Gas Exploration? 10/08/2017 : Έηϧϟ΍Φϳέύη
    What Drives Turkey¶s Intensified Offshore : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ Oil and Gas Exploration? What Drives Turkey¶s Intensified Offshore : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Oil and Gas Exploration? 10/08/2017 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΔϣΩϘΗϣϟ΍ΕΎγ΍έΩϟ΍ϭΙΎΣΑϸϟϝΑϘΗγϣϟ΍ίϛέϣ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ 9/24/2021 12:56:45 AM 1 / 2 Turkey has recently launched vigorous efforts to increase its domestic oil and natural gas production to meet its domestic demands. The ongoing problem of reliance on energy imports to meet the majority of its increasing demand has become a key determinant in Turkey¶s foreign policy. It is even driving the country¶s push towards convergence with the world¶s biggest two gas exporters, especially Russia.Over the recent years, the Turkish oil and gas sector witnessed a surge in exploration and prospection, exploration and drilling activity in the country's south-eastern regions. Onshore, foreign companies discovered giant reserves of VKDOHJDVQHDU'L\DUEDNÕU&LW\$VDIXUWKHUVWHSWKH7XUNLVKJRYHUQPHQWKDVUHFHQWO\LQWHQVLILHGSURVSHFWLQJIRURIIVKRUHRLODQG gas resources in both the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. Turkey¶s new effort bears three key indication. Firstly, Ankara wants to consolidate its international influence, especially because global investments shifted their priority in favor of the strategic regions. Secondly, Ankara is keen on narrowing the gap between domestic energy consumption and production. Thirdly, Turkey seeks to preempt attempts by the Greek part of Cyprus to increase its oil and exploration operations in the Mediterranean Sea. Nonetheless, Turkish exploration operations could largely face difficulties due to slowing investment flow caused either by falling oil prices or increasing geopolitical risks. Intensified OperationsAccording to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Turkey¶s proven oil reserves do not exceed 312 million barrels, which is why its daily production was as low as 62000 barrels per day in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 3NOV201015291889 Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom U.S
    3NOV201015291889 Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom U.S.$30,000,000,000 Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes issued by, but with limited recourse to, Gaz Capital S.A., for the sole purpose of financing a loan to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom Under the Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes described in this Base Prospectus (the ‘‘Programme’’), Gaz Capital S.A. (the ‘‘Issuer’’), subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, may from time to time issue loan participation notes (the ‘‘Notes’’) on the terms set out herein, as completed by a final terms document (each, ‘‘Final Terms’’) or a series prospectus (each, ‘‘Series Prospectus’’) setting out the specific terms of each issue. The aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding will not at any time exceed U.S.$30,000,000,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies). This Base Prospectus supersedes any previous base prospectus, offering circular or supplement thereto relating to the Programme. Any Notes issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Base Prospectus are issued subject to the provisions herein. This Base Prospectus does not affect any Notes issued prior to the date hereof. Notes will be issued in Series (as defined in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) and the sole purpose of issuing each Series will be to finance loans (each a ‘‘Loan’’) to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom (the ‘‘Borrower,’’ ‘‘Gazprom’’ or the ‘‘Company’’) as borrower, on the terms of an amended and restated facility agreement between the Issuer and the Borrower dated December 7, 2005 (the ‘‘Facility Agreement’’), as amended and supplemented by a loan supplement to be entered into in respect of each Loan on each Issue Date (each a ‘‘Loan Supplement’’ and, together with the Facility Agreement, each a ‘‘Loan Agreement’’) between the Issuer and the Borrower.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Embargoed Until 9:30 AM GMT Tuesday April 29, 2003
    Campagna per la Riforma della Banca Mondiale ♦ Cornerhouse ♦ FERN ♦ Friends of the Earth England Wales & Northern Ireland ♦ Friends of the Earth France ♦ Friends of the Earth Netherlands ♦ Friends of the Earth US ♦ Platform ♦ Urgewald ♦ WEED ♦ Germanwatch ♦BUND PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until 9:30 AM GMT Tuesday April 29, 2003 Groups File Claim Against BP and Pipeline Partners in 5 Countries: “Green” Company Violating International Norms in Controversial Caspian Oil Pipeline As political and business leaders gather in Paris for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Forum 2003, environmental organizations today submitted complaints to the British, French, German, Italian, and U.S. governments charging that BP and its consortium partners1 in the proposed Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline are breaching the OECD’s “Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.” The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline is a proposed pipeline that would span 1,056 miles (1,760 kilometers) from the Azerbaijan capital of Baku, through T'bilisi Georgia, ending in the Mediterranean city of Ceyhan, Turkey. A gas pipeline also is planned to follow the same route. British Petroleum (BP) is the lead sponsor; there are nine other participants in the consortium. The BTC consortium is seeking the political and financial support of their countries’ export credit agencies, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank Group. The OECD Guidelines oblige companies to “contribute to sustainable development and to refrain from seeking or accepting exemptions from environmental, health, safety, labour, taxation and other legislation”. The NGOs charge that the Consortium has negotiated agreements that openly flout this obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiongain -V1531/ Publisher Sample
    Visiongain http://www.marketresearch.com/Visiongain -v1531/ Publisher Sample Phone: 800.298.5699 (US) or +1.240.747.3093 or +1.240.747.3093 (Int'l) Hours: Monday - Thursday: 5:30am - 6:30pm EST Fridays: 5:30am - 5:30pm EST Email: [email protected] MarketResearch.com Oil & Gas Pipelines Market Report 2014-2024: Existing Infrastructure, Capex & Length Forecasts, Contract Analysis & Leading Company Profiles Table 5.2.4 Eurasian Major Oil Pipeline Existing Infrastructure (Name, Length (km), Diameter (cm), Capacity (Mto/y), Route, Partners, Commission Date) Name Length Diameter Capacity Route Partners Commissi (km) (cm) (Mto/y) oned ONSHORE Adria- Wien 420 46 8 From: OMV, BP Austria, 1970 Transalpine Pipeline, Shell Austria, Esso Würmlach Austria, Agip To: Schwechat Refinery Adria oil 502 51 13.68 From: Omišalj Oil Jadranski naftovod, 1990 Terminal Naftna Industrija To: Srbije Százhalombatta (Duna refinery), Pančevo, Kostrena (Urinj refinery), Lendava, Bosanski Brod Baku - Supsa 833 - 7.4 From: State Oil Company of 1999 Baku (Sangachal Azerbaijan, Terminal), Azerbaijan Azerbaijan International To: Operating Company Supsa terminal in Georgia Baku- 1330 53 5 From: SOCAR, Azerbaijan 1997 Novorossiysk Baku (Sangachal International Terminal), Azerbaijan Operating Company, Transneft To: Novorossiysk, Russia Baku–Tbilisi– 1768 107 51 From: BP, SOCAR, Chevron, 2006 Ceyhan (BTC) Baku (Sangachal Statoil, TPAO, Eni, Terminal), Azerbaijan Total S.A., Itochu, Inpex, To: ConocoPhillips, Hess Ceyhan, Turkey Corporation Baltic 1300 102 76.5
    [Show full text]