DOCSLIB.ORG

Kick Off MMU December

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kick Off MMU December Forward looking statements This presentation material contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and These forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and are, by uncertainties. In some cases, we use words such as "ambition", "continue", "could", "estimate", their nature, subject to significant risks and uncertainties because they relate to events "expect", "focus", "likely", "may", "outlook", "plan", "strategy", "will", "guidance" and similar and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors expressions to identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those historical fact, including, among others, statements regarding future financial position, results of expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including levels of industry operations and cash flows; changes in the fair value of derivatives; future financial ratios and product supply, demand and pricing; price and availability of alternative fuels; currency information; future financial or operational portfolio or performance; future market position and exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations; the political and economic policies of Norway conditions; business strategy; growth strategy; future impact of accounting policy judgments; and other oil-producing countries; EU directives; general economic conditions; political sales, trading and market strategies; research and development initiatives and strategy; market and social stability and economic growth in relevant areas of the world; Euro-zone outlook and future economic projections and assumptions; competitive position; projected uncertainty; global political events and actions, including war, terrorism and sanctions; regularity and performance levels; expectations related to our recent transactions, projects and security breaches, including breaches of our digital infrastructure (cybersecurity); changes discoveries, such as the Wintershall agreement, the agreement with OMV and discoveries in the or uncertainty in or non-compliance with laws and governmental regulations; the timing of Bay du Nord prospect in the Flemish Pass Basin offshore Newfoundland as well as on the NCS; bringing new fields on stream; an inability to exploit growth or investment opportunities; the termination of the full-scale carbon capture project at Mongstad; Statoil's interest in the material differences from reserves estimates; unsuccessful drilling; an inability to find and OMV-operated Wisting Central oil discovery in the Hoop area; completion and results of develop reserves; ineffectiveness of crisis management systems; adverse changes in tax acquisitions, disposals and other contractual arrangements; reserve information; future margins; regimes; the development and use of new technology; geological or technical difficulties; projected returns; future levels, timing or development of capacity, reserves or resources; future operational problems; operator error; inadequate insurance coverage; the lack of decline of mature fields; planned maintenance (and the effects thereof); oil and gas production necessary transportation infrastructure when a field is in a remote location and other forecasts and reporting; domestic and international growth, expectations and development of transportation problems; the actions of competitors; the actions of field partners; the production, projects, pipelines or resources; estimates related to production and development actions of governments (including the Norwegian state as majority shareholder); levels and dates; operational expectations, estimates, schedules and costs; exploration and counterparty defaults; natural disasters and adverse weather conditions, climate change, development activities, plans and expectations; projections and expectations for upstream and and other changes to business conditions; failure to meet our ethical and social downstream activities; oil, gas, alternative fuel and energy prices; oil, gas, alternative fuel and standards; an inability to attract and retain personnel; relevant governmental approvals energy supply and demand; natural gas contract prices; timing of gas off-take; technological (including in relation to the agreement with Wintershall); industrial actions by workers and innovation, implementation, position and expectations; projected operational costs or savings; other factors discussed elsewhere in this report. Additional information, including projected unit of production cost; our ability to create or improve value; future sources of information on factors that may affect Statoil's business, is contained in Statoil's Annual financing; exploration and project development expenditure; effectiveness of our internal policies Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the U.S. Securities and plans; our ability to manage our risk exposure; our liquidity levels and management; and Exchange Commission, which can be found on Statoil's website at www.statoil.com. estimated or future liabilities, obligations or expenses and how such liabilities, obligations and expenses are structured; expected impact of currency and interest rate fluctuations; Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are expectations related to contractual or financial counterparties; capital expenditure estimates and reasonable, we cannot assure you that our future results, level of activity, performance or expectations; projected outcome, objectives of management for future operations; impact of PSA achievements will meet these expectations. Moreover, neither we nor any other person effects; projected impact or timing of administrative or governmental rules, standards, decisions, assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking standards or laws (including taxation laws); estimated costs of removal and abandonment; statements. Unless we are required by law to update these statements, we will not estimated lease payments and gas transport commitments are forward-looking statements. You necessarily update any of these statements after the date of this report, either to make should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could them conform to actual results or changes in our expectations. differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described above in "Financial Risk update". 2 Oil and gas prices – volatility is part of the game Higher oil prices and gas prices in Europe, decoupled gas in North America Oil price Gas prices Brent blend (USD/bbl, 2013 prices) Henry Hub and NBP (USD/MMBtu, 2013 prices) 150 20 Actual NBP actual 120 Historical average NBP Historical average 15 HH actual HH historical average 90 10 60 5 30 0 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1975 1985 1995 2005 4 Kilder: Reuters EcoWin, Statoil. Uncertainty is something we are always facing … which makes predictions valuable and disagreements profitable … Dow Jones Industrial Average Dow Jones Industrial Average Dow Jones Industrial Average Monthly change (%) 18000 100000 50 16000 40 10000 14000 30 12000 20 1000 10000 10 8000 100 0 6000 -10 4000 10 2000 -20 0 1 -30 1900 1912 1924 1936 1948 1960 1972 1984 1996 2008 1926 1900 1913 1939 1952 1965 1978 1991 2004 1900 1913 1926 1939 1952 1965 1978 1991 2004 5 Source: Reuters EcoWin A strong trend affecting economics and energy Economic gravity moves (back) to the east, and so does energy demand The global economic centre of gravity Shifting energy demand Based on geographical weighting of GDP Share in global energy demand, % 100 75 50 25 0 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Rest of world India China OECD Pacific OECD Europe OECD North America 6 Source: McKinsey (map), IEA, Statoil Growth, efficiency and energy demand Non-OECD driving growth, energy efficiency to improve by almost 40% Economic growth Growth and energy intensity Global energy demand Annual change in GDP (%) Growth (%) and toe/million 2005-USD TPED, bn toe '91-00 '01-10 11-20 20 8 21-30 '31-40 8 300 International bunkers Other non-OECD Non-OECD Asia OECD 6 15 4 200 4 10 0 100 2 5 TPED GDP 0 Energy intensity (rhs) OECD Non- Other -4 0 0 OECD non- 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Asia OECD 7 Source: IHS Global Insight and IEA, Statoil Fossil fuels are here to stay Emerging economies drive demand growth – oil demand peaks ~ 2030 Global oil demand Global gas demand ex bio fuels, mbd 1000 bcm 150 6 International bunkers International bunkers Other non-OECD 125 Non-OECD Asia 5 Other non-OECD OECD Non-OECD Asia 100 4 OECD 75 3 50 2 25 1 0 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 8 Source: IEA, Statoil Global economy: cautious improvement Slow and uneven growth, but still on track for a gradual acceleration Economic growth 2000-2015 • US economy Annual change in GDP (%) – Some GDP loss from shutdown expected 15 OECD in 4Q 2013, but still on track for stronger Non-OECD USA growth China – Debt ceiling looms in 2014 10 • Eurozone – Out of record long recession, finally 5 – Will continue to grow over the final quarter of 2013 and beyond, but growth will be muted 0 • Japan sees temporary boom China’s recent uptick underpinned by -5 • 2000 2005 2010 2015 policy support and improved exports • Risk and uncertainty remain elevated 9 Source: IHS Global Insight and Statoil Classification: 9 Oil price action
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company EUR 750,000,000 2.625 Per Cent
    MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company EUR 750,000,000 2.625 per cent. Notes due 2023 Issue Price: 99.214 per cent. The EUR 750,000,000 2.625 per cent. Notes due 2023 (the Notes) are issued by MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company (the Issuer or MOL). Unless previously redeemed or cancelled, the Notes will be redeemed at their principal amount on 28 April 2023 (the Maturity Date). The Notes will bear interest from and including 28 April 2016 (the Issue Date) at the rate of 2.625 per cent. per annum. Interest on the Notes will be payable annually in arrear on 28 April in each year, commencing on 28 April 2017 . Payments on the Notes will be made in euro. The Issuer may, at its option, redeem all, but not some only, of the Notes at any time at par plus accrued interest, in the event of certain tax changes as described under Condition 7.2 (Redemption for Taxation Reasons). A holder of Notes may, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control as described in Condition 7.3 (Redemption at the option of the Noteholders), require the Issuer to redeem the Notes at par plus accrued interest. The Notes mature on 28 April 2023. This prospectus (the Prospectus) has been approved by the Central Bank of Ireland, as competent authority under Directive 2003/71/EC (which includes the amendments made by Directive 2010/73/EU) (the Prospectus Directive). Such approval relates only to Notes which are to be admitted to trading on a regulated market for the purposes of Directive 2004/39/EC and/or which are to be offered to the public in any Member State of the European Economic Area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Gas Corridor
    Energy July 2013 THE SOUTHERN GAS CORRIDOR The recent decision of The State Oil Company of The EU Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) and its consortium identified the development of a Southern Gas partners to transport the Shah Deniz gas through Corridor to supply Europe with gas from Caspian Southern Europe via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) and Middle Eastern sources as one of the EU’s is a key milestone in the creation of the Southern “highest energy securities priorities”. Azerbaijan, Gas Corridor. Turkmenistan, Iraq and Mashreq countries (as well as in the longer term, when political conditions This Briefing examines the origins, aims and permit, Uzbekistan and Iran) were identified development of the Southern Gas Corridor, including as partners which the EU would work with to the competing proposals to deliver gas through it. secure commitments for the supply of gas and the construction of the pipelines necessary for its Background development. It was clear from the Action Plan that the EU wanted increased independence from In 2007, driven by political incidents in gas supplier Russia. The EU Commission President José Manuel and transit countries, and the dependence by some Barroso stated that the EU needs “a collective EU Member States on a single gas supplier, the approach to key infrastructure to diversify our European Council agreed a new EU energy and energy supply – pipelines in particular. Today eight environment policy. The policy established a political Member States are reliant on just one supplier for agenda to achieve the Community’s core energy 100% of their gas needs – this is a problem we must objectives of sustainability, competitiveness and address”.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    ANNUAL REPORT 2010 Annual Creportontent 2010 s 1 2 Key performance indicators 92 board of directors and management board 4 message to shareholders 92 Governing bodies structure of JsC Gazprom Neft 9 highlights 93 Membership of the Board of Directors 100 Membership of the Management Board 12 development strategy 105 Total compensation for members of Board 18 Company history of Directors and Management Board 20 Company structure 22 Geography of operations 106 environment and innovations 26 Competitive state of the company 106 Environmental protection and safety 114 Innovation activity 31 company Key performance indicators by type of operation 119 energy and energy saving in 2010 31 Oil and gas exploration and production 122 social responsibility 41 Oil refining and regional policy 45 Production of petroleum products 122 Personnel, occupational safety, and health 46 Sales of petroleum products management 48 Premium business segments 127 Social responsibility in areas of operations 52 Export of crude oil and petroleum products 129 to shareholders and investors 54 analysis of the company’s 129 Authorised capital shareholder capital financial results of activity structure by the management 130 Share market and capitalisation 54 Definitions and recalculation methodology 132 Participation in the Depositary Receipt 54 Forecast statements Program 55 Key performance indicators for 2008–2010 134 Dividend history 56 Key financial and performance indicators 135 Observing the Corporate Code of Conduct 57 Result of activities for 2010 compared to 2009 138 asset management and 57 Production segments corporate structure 58 Changes in structure of the group 60 Performance indicators and analysis 140 credit ratings and debt portfolio 66 Results of activities management 76 Financial appendices 140 Credit rating 77 Financial indicators 141 Debt obligations 78 Additional information 142 glossary of Key terms 84 investment program and definitions 86 Key risK factors 145 appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report for First Quarter of 2021
    Квартални извештај за први квартал 2021. године QUARTERLY REPORT FOR FIRST QUARTER OF 2021 1 NIS Group The Quarterly Report for First Quarter of 2021 presents a factual overview of NIS Group’s activities, development and performance in first three months of 2020. The Report covers and presents data for NIS Group, comprising NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad and its subsidiaries. If the data pertain only to certain individual subsidiaries or only NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad, it is so noted in the Report. The terms: ‘NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad’ and ‘the Company’ denote the parent company NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad, whereas the terms ‘NIS’ and ‘NIS Group’ pertain to NIS j.s.c. Novi Sad with its subsidiaries. The Quarterly Report for first quarter of 2021 is compiled in Serbian, English and Russian. In case of any discrepancy, the Serbian version shall be given precedence. The Quarterly Report for First Quarter of 2021 is also available online on the corporate website. For any additional information on NIS Group, visit the corporate website www.nis.eu. 2 Quarterly Report For First Quarter Of 2021 Contents Contents .........................................................................................................................................3 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................4 Business report ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Highlights ........................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Petroleum Corp. and Cooperations with Nocs and Iocs
    NOC-IOC Forum Enhancing Global Energy Security through Cooperation and Partnership 30-31 March, 2009 - Kuwait Turkish Petroleum Corp. and Cooperations with NOCs and IOCs Mehmet UYSAL President & CEO TPAO TPAO: Turkish National Oil Company since 1954 • Reserve: ~ 1 billion boe • 2P Reserve: ~ 9 billion boe • Current Production: ~ 80.000 boe/d • E&P experience over 50 years • Recent Offshore Discoveries • Intense Deep Offshore Exploration Activities • Focus: Middle East, North Africa,Caspian Region and South America • Target: E&P Growth, Transportation & Retail Expansion • Current Cash Flow: $ 2,2 billion • 5 year E&P Investments (2004-08): $ 3.54 billion Energy Corridor and CEYHAN Ceyhan OIL GAS LNG Ceyhan Energy Hub BLUENABUCCOBTCSAMSUNTURKMENISTANWESTERNTURKEYIRANKERKTURKEY PIPELINE USTREAM–K ISTURKEY- -–GREECE INCEYHAN PIPELINECEYHAN BETWEEN - 1 PIPELINE-– ITALY THEPIPELINEPIPELINE IRANPIPELINE PRODUCERS INTERCONNECTORPIPELINE AND CONSUMERS, SCP PIPELINE BLUEARAPIRAQLNG (NIGERIA STREAM–GASTURKEYTHEREFORE PIPELINE -2ALGERIA) PROJECT PIPELINE IT IS A NATURAL BRIDGE. Bottlenecks of transportation : 1 Million b/d 3 Million b/d 17 Million b/d 1 Million b/d 12 Million b/d 4 Million b/d 3 Million b/d 6,5 – 7 Million barrel of oil will be marketed via Turkey. NOC’s and IOC’s Oil & Gas Reserves and Daily Productions Oil Reserves Oil Production Billion Barrel EI TOP 100 : 1.059,4 (%86) World Reserve: 1.237,9 2008- EI TOP 100 COMPANIES Natural Gas Reserves Natural Gas Production Tcm EI TOP 100 : 120 (%68) World Reserve: 177,4 Source: BP Statistical Review 2008 , EI Top 100 Companies (2008) Cooperations in BLACK SEA PETROBRAS %50 TPAO %50 Exploration Blocks EXXONMOBIL %50 TPAO %50 Exploration Blocks TPAO %13,5 Expl.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Sanctions
    Iran Sanctions Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs July 9, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS20871 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) Summary Iran is subject to a wide range of U.S. sanctions, restricting trade with, investment, and U.S. foreign aid to Iran, and requiring the United States to vote against international lending to Iran. Several laws and Executive Orders extend sanctions to foreign companies that do business with Iran, as part of an effort to persuade foreign firms to choose between the Iranian market and the much larger U.S. market. A formal U.S. effort to curb international energy investment in Iran began in 1996 with the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA). No firms have been sanctioned under it and the precise effects of that law on energy investment in Iran—as separate from other factors affecting international firms’ decisions on whether to invest in Iran—has been unclear. While international pressure on Iran to curb its nuclear program has increased the hesitation of many major foreign firms to invest in Iran’s energy sector, hindering Iran’s efforts to expand oil production beyond 4.1 million barrels per day, some firms continue to see opportunity in Iran. This particularly appears to be the case for companies in Asia that appear eager to fill the void left by major European and American firms and to line up steady supplies of Iranian oil and gas. ISA was first passed at a time of tightening U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration & Production
    Photo: Ferenc Bibó-Szurkos, Production coordinator, South Hungary Production MOL EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE 2018 MOL GROUP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE – 2018 Photo: Branislav Herchl CONTENT I. MOL GROUP UPSTREAM 2018 II. KEY ACHVIEVEMENTS IN 2017 AND THE 2018 OUTLOOK III. SCHEDULE OF EXPLORATION AND APPRAISAL WELLS IV. LICENCE INFORMATION V. DETAILED WORK PROGRAMS IN 2017 / 2018 V/. HUNGARY V/. CROATIA V/. PAKISTAN V/. UNITED KINGDOM V/. RUSSIA V/. NORWAY V/. KURDISTAN V/. KAZAKHSTAN V/. OTHER COUNTRIES VI. GLOSSARY MOL GROUP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE – 2018 I. MOL GROUP UPSTREAM 2018 2017 PRODUCTION (mboepd)¹ TOTAL: 107 2P RESERVE CHANGES IN 2017 (MMboe)4 CEE MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA CIS NORTH SEA RESERVES (31.12.2016) AFRICA 459 PRODUCTION 2017 Y/E 2P RESERVES (MMboe)² TOTAL: 356 (38) CEE CIS NEW NORTH SEA BOOKINGS 2 MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA AFRICA REVISIONS (69) TOTAL 2017 CAPEX (USD mn)³ TOTAL: 346 CEE PURCH./SALE OF MINERALS NORTH SEA IN PLACE 1 MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA AFRICA RESERVES CIS PRODUCTION (31.12.2017) 356 EXPLORATION 1 Including JVs and Associates (Baitex: 6.2 mboepd, Pearl: 2.4 mboepd) 2 Including JVs and Associates (Baitex: 47.2 MMboe, UGL: 23.5 MMboe) 3 Excluding JVs and Associates (Baitex: 23.8 USD mn, UGL: 1.5 USD mn, Pearl: 0.2 USD mn) 4 Including JVs and Associates (Baitex: 47.2 MMboe, UGL: 23.5 MMboe) 2 MOL GROUP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION UPDATE – 2018 3 II. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2017 AND THE 2018 OUTLOOK In MOL Upstream continued to pursue ecient Moving forward the Upstream business will remain 1 operations, by maintaining low unit direct a key pillar of the integrated business model of MOL 2017/2018 PRODUCTION (mboepd) production cost and disciplined CAPEX spending Group in line with the strate.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Exploration? What Drives Turkey¶S Intensified Offshore : Ωϭοϭϣϟ΍Ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Oil and Gas Exploration? 10/08/2017 : Έηϧϟ΍Φϳέύη
    What Drives Turkey¶s Intensified Offshore : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ Oil and Gas Exploration? What Drives Turkey¶s Intensified Offshore : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Oil and Gas Exploration? 10/08/2017 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΔϣΩϘΗϣϟ΍ΕΎγ΍έΩϟ΍ϭΙΎΣΑϸϟϝΑϘΗγϣϟ΍ίϛέϣ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ 9/24/2021 12:56:45 AM 1 / 2 Turkey has recently launched vigorous efforts to increase its domestic oil and natural gas production to meet its domestic demands. The ongoing problem of reliance on energy imports to meet the majority of its increasing demand has become a key determinant in Turkey¶s foreign policy. It is even driving the country¶s push towards convergence with the world¶s biggest two gas exporters, especially Russia.Over the recent years, the Turkish oil and gas sector witnessed a surge in exploration and prospection, exploration and drilling activity in the country's south-eastern regions. Onshore, foreign companies discovered giant reserves of VKDOHJDVQHDU'L\DUEDNÕU&LW\$VDIXUWKHUVWHSWKH7XUNLVKJRYHUQPHQWKDVUHFHQWO\LQWHQVLILHGSURVSHFWLQJIRURIIVKRUHRLODQG gas resources in both the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. Turkey¶s new effort bears three key indication. Firstly, Ankara wants to consolidate its international influence, especially because global investments shifted their priority in favor of the strategic regions. Secondly, Ankara is keen on narrowing the gap between domestic energy consumption and production. Thirdly, Turkey seeks to preempt attempts by the Greek part of Cyprus to increase its oil and exploration operations in the Mediterranean Sea. Nonetheless, Turkish exploration operations could largely face difficulties due to slowing investment flow caused either by falling oil prices or increasing geopolitical risks. Intensified OperationsAccording to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Turkey¶s proven oil reserves do not exceed 312 million barrels, which is why its daily production was as low as 62000 barrels per day in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 3NOV201015291889 Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom U.S
    3NOV201015291889 Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom U.S.$30,000,000,000 Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes issued by, but with limited recourse to, Gaz Capital S.A., for the sole purpose of financing a loan to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom Under the Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes described in this Base Prospectus (the ‘‘Programme’’), Gaz Capital S.A. (the ‘‘Issuer’’), subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, may from time to time issue loan participation notes (the ‘‘Notes’’) on the terms set out herein, as completed by a final terms document (each, ‘‘Final Terms’’) or a series prospectus (each, ‘‘Series Prospectus’’) setting out the specific terms of each issue. The aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding will not at any time exceed U.S.$30,000,000,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies). This Base Prospectus supersedes any previous base prospectus, offering circular or supplement thereto relating to the Programme. Any Notes issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Base Prospectus are issued subject to the provisions herein. This Base Prospectus does not affect any Notes issued prior to the date hereof. Notes will be issued in Series (as defined in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) and the sole purpose of issuing each Series will be to finance loans (each a ‘‘Loan’’) to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom (the ‘‘Borrower,’’ ‘‘Gazprom’’ or the ‘‘Company’’) as borrower, on the terms of an amended and restated facility agreement between the Issuer and the Borrower dated December 7, 2005 (the ‘‘Facility Agreement’’), as amended and supplemented by a loan supplement to be entered into in respect of each Loan on each Issue Date (each a ‘‘Loan Supplement’’ and, together with the Facility Agreement, each a ‘‘Loan Agreement’’) between the Issuer and the Borrower.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Embargoed Until 9:30 AM GMT Tuesday April 29, 2003
    Campagna per la Riforma della Banca Mondiale ♦ Cornerhouse ♦ FERN ♦ Friends of the Earth England Wales & Northern Ireland ♦ Friends of the Earth France ♦ Friends of the Earth Netherlands ♦ Friends of the Earth US ♦ Platform ♦ Urgewald ♦ WEED ♦ Germanwatch ♦BUND PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until 9:30 AM GMT Tuesday April 29, 2003 Groups File Claim Against BP and Pipeline Partners in 5 Countries: “Green” Company Violating International Norms in Controversial Caspian Oil Pipeline As political and business leaders gather in Paris for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Forum 2003, environmental organizations today submitted complaints to the British, French, German, Italian, and U.S. governments charging that BP and its consortium partners1 in the proposed Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline are breaching the OECD’s “Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.” The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline is a proposed pipeline that would span 1,056 miles (1,760 kilometers) from the Azerbaijan capital of Baku, through T'bilisi Georgia, ending in the Mediterranean city of Ceyhan, Turkey. A gas pipeline also is planned to follow the same route. British Petroleum (BP) is the lead sponsor; there are nine other participants in the consortium. The BTC consortium is seeking the political and financial support of their countries’ export credit agencies, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank Group. The OECD Guidelines oblige companies to “contribute to sustainable development and to refrain from seeking or accepting exemptions from environmental, health, safety, labour, taxation and other legislation”. The NGOs charge that the Consortium has negotiated agreements that openly flout this obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiongain -V1531/ Publisher Sample
    Visiongain http://www.marketresearch.com/Visiongain -v1531/ Publisher Sample Phone: 800.298.5699 (US) or +1.240.747.3093 or +1.240.747.3093 (Int'l) Hours: Monday - Thursday: 5:30am - 6:30pm EST Fridays: 5:30am - 5:30pm EST Email: [email protected] MarketResearch.com Oil & Gas Pipelines Market Report 2014-2024: Existing Infrastructure, Capex & Length Forecasts, Contract Analysis & Leading Company Profiles Table 5.2.4 Eurasian Major Oil Pipeline Existing Infrastructure (Name, Length (km), Diameter (cm), Capacity (Mto/y), Route, Partners, Commission Date) Name Length Diameter Capacity Route Partners Commissi (km) (cm) (Mto/y) oned ONSHORE Adria- Wien 420 46 8 From: OMV, BP Austria, 1970 Transalpine Pipeline, Shell Austria, Esso Würmlach Austria, Agip To: Schwechat Refinery Adria oil 502 51 13.68 From: Omišalj Oil Jadranski naftovod, 1990 Terminal Naftna Industrija To: Srbije Százhalombatta (Duna refinery), Pančevo, Kostrena (Urinj refinery), Lendava, Bosanski Brod Baku - Supsa 833 - 7.4 From: State Oil Company of 1999 Baku (Sangachal Azerbaijan, Terminal), Azerbaijan Azerbaijan International To: Operating Company Supsa terminal in Georgia Baku- 1330 53 5 From: SOCAR, Azerbaijan 1997 Novorossiysk Baku (Sangachal International Terminal), Azerbaijan Operating Company, Transneft To: Novorossiysk, Russia Baku–Tbilisi– 1768 107 51 From: BP, SOCAR, Chevron, 2006 Ceyhan (BTC) Baku (Sangachal Statoil, TPAO, Eni, Terminal), Azerbaijan Total S.A., Itochu, Inpex, To: ConocoPhillips, Hess Ceyhan, Turkey Corporation Baltic 1300 102 76.5
    [Show full text]
  • Karadeniz'de Petrol Arama Shell & TPAO
    Petrol Sızıntısına Önlem ve Müdahale Karadeniz'de Petrol Arama Shell & TPAO Shell ve TPAO ortaklığı, petrol sızıntısı riskini çok ciddiye almaktadır. Bu kapsamda bütün projelerin tasarımında kazara bir sızıntı olması ihtimalini en aza indirgemeye büyük özen göstermektedir. Potansiyel petrol sızıntılarını yönetmenin iki temel yönü vardır. S hell Upstream Turkey BV (SUT) ile Türkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortaklığı (TPAO), Karadeniz’in batısında, Türkiye Münhasır Ekonomik Bölgesi’nde bir petrol arama kuyusu (‘Sile 1’) açmayı planlamıştır. Arama sondaj noktası İstanbul’un Kontroller ve önlemler aracılığıyla sızıntıyı engelleme: kuzeyinde kıyıdan yaklaşık 100 km açıkta olup, 2.093 metre su derinliğinde yer alacaktır. Proje faaliyetleri 2014 yılının sonu /2015 yılının başı için planlanmıştır. • Proje faaliyetlerinin emniyetli operasyon kontrol limitleri içerisinde kalması • Bir sızıntı ihtimalinin azaltılması K uyu, Noble Globetrotter II (NGTII) sondaj gemisi tarafından açılacak olup, İstanbul Haydarpaşa Limanı’nda bulunan Bir sızıntı olması halinde bunun sonuçlarına karşılık veren sızıntı önlem yöntemleri: bir kıyı tedarik üssü ve üç adet Platform Destek Gemisi (PDG) ile desteklenecektir. Sondaj operasyonları emniyet gereklilikleri nedeniyle 500 m’lik bir kuşak içerisinde girişe kapalı bölgede gerçekleştirilecektir. Personel transferi için İstanbul Atatürk • Sızıntıyı durdurmaya ve sızan petrolü kontrol altına almaya yönelik acil durum müdahale yöntemleri • Sızıntının kapsadığı alanı sınırlamaya ve sızan petrolü temizlemeye ilişkin planlar Havalimanı’ndan kaldırılacak helikopterler kullanılacaktır. Sondaj esnasında kıyıdaki tedarik üssünde 20 ile 50 ve sondaj gemisinde yaklaşık 180 çalışan olması öngörülmektedir. Projenin sekiz ay sürmesi planlanmaktadır. Shell ve TPAO ortaklığı, Türkiye’nin ulusal yükümlülüklerini ve en iyi endüstriyel uygulumaları yerine getirebilmek adına bir Petrol Sızıntısı Müdahale Planı geliştiriyor. Projenin başlangıcından önce bu planı tamamlamak için ilgili Türk mercileri ile birlikte çalışmalarımız devam etmektedir.
    [Show full text]