DOCSLIB.ORG

Homes4life Deliverable D2.5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Homes4life Deliverable D2.5 Ref. Ares(2019)7390107 - 30/11/2019 Certified smart and integrated living environments for ageing well D2.5-Innovation Analysis report Charting Europe’s Innovation Landscape for Age-friendly Housing Deliverable D3.2 Authors and institution Frans Sengers (Utrecht University), Alexander Peine (Utrecht University) Date 30-Nov-19 Dissemination level PU Public, fully open, e.g. web X CO Confidential, restricted under conditions set out in Model Grant Agreement CI Classified, information as referred to in Commission Decision 2001/844/EC This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 826295. The content of this document reflects only the author’s view and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. D2.5 | Innovation Analysis report Document change history Date Version Authors / Description commentators 27-Mar-2019 v0.1 UU + TNO + AGE + Approach Innovation analysis Eurocarers + TEC + proposed UPM 11-Jun-2019 v0.2 All partners Approach Innovation analysis consolidated 8-Nov-2019 v0.3 UU Consolidation outline draft UU internal 25-Nov-2019 v0.4 UU Send full draft 28-Nov-2019 v0.5 All partners Feedback on full draft 29-Nov-2019 V0.6 UU Integrate feedback to produce final report 30-Nov-2019 V1.0 UU + TEC Submission to EC Public 2 D2.5 | Innovation Analysis report Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 7 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Homes4Life ............................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Aims and objectives of this report ........................................................................ 8 1.3 Relations to other activities in the project ........................................................... 9 1.4 Report structure .................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Contribution of partners ...................................................................................... 10 2 Conceptual background: on innovation and homes .................................. 12 2.1 Home as a starting point ..................................................................................... 12 2.2 Home as an innovation junction ........................................................................ 12 2.3 Home as a site for experimentation ................................................................... 13 2.4 Home as a patchwork of regimes ...................................................................... 14 3 Methods: a three-step approach ................................................................... 16 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Step 1: Scoping .................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Step 2: Analysis .................................................................................................... 18 3.4 Step 3: Implications ............................................................................................. 19 4 Findings: experimenting with age-friendly housing across Europe ............ 20 4.1 Database .............................................................................................................. 20 4.2 The Netherlands ................................................................................................... 29 4.2.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 29 4.2.2 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 29 4.2.3 Exemplary pilots ................................................................................................................. 33 4.2.4 Support structures .............................................................................................................. 35 4.3 Ireland .................................................................................................................. 37 4.3.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 37 4.3.2 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 37 4.3.3 Exemplary pilots ................................................................................................................. 39 4.3.4 Support structures .............................................................................................................. 40 4.4 France ................................................................................................................... 42 4.4.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 42 4.4.2 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 42 Public 3 D2.5 | Innovation Analysis report 4.4.3 Exemplary pilots ................................................................................................................. 43 4.4.4 Support structures .............................................................................................................. 45 4.5 Poland................................................................................................................... 47 4.5.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 47 4.5.2 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 47 4.5.3 Exemplary pilots ................................................................................................................. 50 4.5.4 Support structures .............................................................................................................. 51 5 Conclusion: implications and reflections ...................................................... 55 5.1 Readiness levels .................................................................................................. 55 5.2 Pathways and patterns ........................................................................................ 57 5.3 Implications for certification ............................................................................... 60 6 References ........................................................................................................ 63 7 Annexes ............................................................................................................ 65 7.1 Annex 1: Interview Protocol ................................................................................ 65 Public 4 D2.5 | Innovation Analysis report List of Tables and Figures FIGURE 1 – METHODOLOGICAL STEPS FIGURE 2 – THE HOGEWEYK FIGURE 3 – THE GREAT NORTHERN HAVEN FIGURE 4 – 27 DELVALLE FIGURE 5 – MIMO WIEKU APARTMENT TABLE 1 – EXPERIMENTS RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES THROUGHOUT EUROPE TABLE 2 – EXPERIMENTS RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN THE NETHERLANDS TABLE 3 – SUPPORT PROGRAMMES RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN THE NETHERLANDS TABLE 4 – EXPERIMENTS RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN IRELAND TABLE 5 – SUPPORT PROGRAMS RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN IRELAND TABLE 6 – EXPERIMENTS RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN FRANCE TABLE 7 – SUPPORT INITIATIVES RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN FRANCE TABLE 8 – EXPERIMENTS RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN POLAND TABLE 9 – SUPPORT INITIATIVES RELATED TO AGE-FRIENDLY HOMES IN POLAND Public 5 D2.5 | Innovation Analysis report Acronyms and abbreviations AAL Active Assisted Living EIP AHA European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing DIY Do It Yourself EU European Union H4L Homes4Life project ICT Information and Communication Technologies TIS Technological Innovation Systems WHO World Health Organisation WP Work Package Public 6 D2.5 | Innovation Analysis report Executive Summary Throughout Europe a variety of innovative pilot projects – or ‘experiments’ – are being implemented to improve the life-course resilience of existing and newly built home environments. These experiments reflect the distinct socio-economic context of their locations and, more importantly, they provide a glance into potential future directions for the development of age-friendly homes. It is important to take stock of this diversity in order to get ideas about the range of home environments into which the Homes4Life certification scheme might be introduced and therefore about the flexibility required by the certification scheme when it is deployed throughout Europe. This report provides an overview of 67 ongoing experiments in the domain of age-friendly housing. By focusing on four countries – the Netherlands, Poland, Ireland and France – we draw more detailed attention to some of these experiments. Overall, we find that, besides the variation between these countries, there is a more important type variation in terms of differences in the character of these experiments and the directions proposed by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Case Study: the Surroundings of the Eastern Part of the Former Airport Runway Rakowice-Czyżyny in Cracow
    Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series No. 27 (2015): 81–93 BULLETIN OF GEOGRAPHY. SOCIO–ECONOMIC SERIES DE journal homepages: http://www.bulletinofgeography.umk.pl/ http://wydawnictwoumk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/BGSS/index http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bog ISSN 1732–4254 quarterly G Mechanisms of densification of the city in the neoliberal economy - a case study: the surroundings of the eastern part of the former airport runway Rakowice-Czyżyny in Cracow Dominika Hołuj1, CDFM, Artur Hołuj2, CDMR Cracow University of Economics, Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland; 1Department of Economic and Social History, UNES- CO Chair for Heritage and Urban Studies; phone: +48 122 937 466; e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author); 2De- partment of Regional Economy, Chair for Economy of Region and Spatial Engineering; phone: +48 122 935 314; e-mail: holuja@ uek.krakow.pl How to cite: Hołuj, D. and Hołuj, A., 2015: Mechanisms of densification of the city in the neoliberal economy - a case study: the surroundings of the eastern part of the former airport runway Rakowice-Czyżyny in Cracow. In: Szymańska, D. and Rogatka, K. editors, Bulle- tin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 27, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University, pp. 81–93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ bog-2015-0006 Abstract. The article is a case study of land use planning in the surroundings of Article details: the eastern side of the runway of the former airport Rakowice-Czyżyny in Cra- Received: 5 December 2013 cow. The area was chosen because it is an example reflecting the history of many Revised: 22 April 2014 urban spaces that are well connected externally, well equipped in infrastructure, Accepted: 7 December 2014 and favourably located in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Europe UNITARY COUNTRY
    Poland EUROPe UNITARY COUNTRY Basic socio-economic indicators Income group - HIGH INCOME: OECD Local currency - Zloty (PLN) Population and geography Economic data AREA: 312 679 km2 GDP: 960.2 billion (current PPP international dollars) i.e. 24 952 dollars per inhabitant (2014) POPULATION: million inhabitants (2014), 38.484 REAL GDP GROWTH: 3.3% (2014 vs 2013) a decrease of 0.0% per year (2010-14) UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 9% (2014) 2 DENSITY: 123 inhabitants/km FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, NET INFLOWS (FDI): 17 275 (BoP, current USD millions, 2014) URBAN POPULATION: 60.6% of national population GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION (GFCF): 20% of GDP (2014) CAPITAL CITY: Warsaw (4.5% of national population) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX: 0.843 (very high), rank 36 Sources: OECD, Eurostat, World Bank, UNDP, ILO Territorial organisation and subnational government responsibilities MUNICIPAL LEVEL INTERMEDIATE LEVEL REGIONAL OR STATE LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF SNGs 2 478 380 16 2 874 municipalities counties regions (gmina) (powiat) (województwo) Average municipal size: 15 530 inhabitantS Main features of territorial organisation. Poland has a three-tier system of subnational government, enshrined in the Constitution ratified in 1997. The regional level (voivodeships) was created by the 1999 Local Government Organisation Act. The intermediate level is made up of counties which were abolished in 1975 and re-established in 1999. Among the counties, 314 are “rural counties” and 66 are urban municipalities with county status. Having more than 100 000 inhabitants, they exercise both municipal and county responsibilities. Municipalities, re-established in 1990, are divided into three categories: urban municipalities, rural municipalities and mixed municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Regional Development in the Context of Population Ageing. Analysis Based on the Example of Opolskie Voivodeship
    sustainability Article Challenges of Regional Development in the Context of Population Ageing. Analysis Based on the Example of Opolskie Voivodeship Krystian Heffner 1, Brygida Klemens 2,* and Brygida Solga 2 1 Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice, ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland; heff[email protected] 2 Faculty of Economics and Management, Opole University of Technology, ul. Luboszycka 7, 45-036 Opole, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-6064-48067 Received: 19 July 2019; Accepted: 16 September 2019; Published: 23 September 2019 Abstract: Demographic changes, primarily the problem of progressive ageing, are one of the key challenges to development in Poland. The Opolskie voivodeship belongs to the regions characterised by extremely unfavourable demographic phenomena. This is because some population changes here have a broader dimension than on average in Poland and in the EU. Thereby, they have far-reaching as well as complex economic and social consequences in the region. Due to the fact that demographic processes are determined in the long term, and it is extremely difficult to influence them in the short term, the adaptation of social and economic spheres and, at the same time, the use of specific opportunities resulting from these changes, seems a useful strategy for regional development policy. Therefore, in the context of senioral policy, complex, coherent and diversified activities in the sphere of growth of professional activity of elderly people, support for life-long learning, improvement of seniors’ living conditions, including the development of health infrastructure, and seniors’ integration in society prove to be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Values As a Factor in the Location of Residential Investments
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bernaciak, Arnold; Strzelecka, Natalia Article Natural values as a factor in the location of residential investments Economic and Environmental Studies (E&ES) Provided in Cooperation with: Opole University Suggested Citation: Bernaciak, Arnold; Strzelecka, Natalia (2014) : Natural values as a factor in the location of residential investments, Economic and Environmental Studies (E&ES), ISSN 2081-8319, Opole University, Faculty of Economics, Opole, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 149-162 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/178854 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu www.ees.uni.opole.pl ISSN paper version 1642-2597 ISSN electronic version 2081-8319 Economic and Environmental Studies Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Samodzielność Jednostek Pomocniczych Samorządu Terytorialnego
    ZARZĄDZANIE PUBLICZNE 4(12)/2010 Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego dr Adam Strzelecki Toruńska Szkoła Wyższa w Toruniu Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy SAMODZIELNOŚĆ JEDNOSTEK POMOCNICZYCH SAMORZĄDU TERYTORIALNEGO Streszczenie Problematykę samodzielności w samorządzie terytorialnym rozważa się przede wszystkim w stosunku do podstawowych jednostek tej formy sprawowania władzy, to jest w stosunku do gminy i powiatu. Samodzielność fi nansowa wynika ze stopnia autonomii fi nansowej lub decen- tralizacji fi nansowej. Zupełnie inaczej przedstawia się samodzielność fi nansowa w jednostkach pomocniczych gminy, to znaczy w osiedlach i dzielnicach dużych i średnich miast. Podstawowy plan publiczny, jakim jest budżet, występuje tylko w gminie, powiecie i województwie. W wy- padku osiedli i dzielnic to od organu stanowiącego zależy, czy podejmie inicjatywę powołania rad osiedlowych, dzielnicowych i wyposaży te rady w odpowiednie kompetencje i środki fi nan- sowe na realizację ich zadań. Na potrzeby charakterystyki jednostek pomocniczych zostało wybrane: po 6 dużych miast wojewódzkich, w których jest zauważalna efektywność działalności rad osiedlowych, rad dzielnic, po 6 miast, które utraciły status miasta wojewódzkiego i po 6 miast powiatowych średniej wielkości. W wyniku przedstawionych badań na przykładach dużych miast wojewódz- kich odnotowano rozwój samorządności dzielnicowej, osiedlowej. Nie we wszystkich nato- miast byłych miastach wojewódzkich i powiatowych zostały powołane jednostki pomocnicze,
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Raw Materials and Commodities of Poland
    Przegl¹d Geologiczny, vol. 52, no. 8/2, 2004 Mineral raw materials and commodities of Poland Marcin Piwocki*, Stanis³aw Przenios³o* A b s t r a c t. Mineral resources of Poland are presented in a historical view, from the prehistoric beginnings till the present day. Some of the mineral resources in Poland have been exploited constantly since the 11th–12th century — these resources are zinc and lead ores and rock salt. One of the important Polish mining traditions concers of hard coal. Noteworthy is the world earliest crude oil mining industry in the Carpathians region. In the present day, the main achievements of Polish economic geology are: the discovery of copper and silver ores in the Fore-Sudetic monocline; documentation of a new major coal basin in Europe, in the Lublin region, and lignite deposits in the central and western Poland; the discovery of the worlds biggest native sulphur deposits in the Carpathian Foredeep; and also the discovery of the gas fields in the Carpathian Foredeep and in the Polish Lowland. Within the last fifty years some of the mineral raw materials, like iron ores and native sulphur deposits, have lost their economic value. Key words: Poland; mineral resources, deposits, resources, history of investigations Poland has resources of various useful minerals. Many resources, such as metals, was the domain of practics, the of them have been mined for ages and were traditionally prospectors and “treasure hunters”. Thus, from mining and regarded as typical for the country. Some gained importan- mineralogy a new discpline emerged, called first geognosy, ce only in recent decades, while others lost their value.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2020 JESSICA Evaluation Study for Nine Polish Regions
    2014-2020 JESSICA Evaluation Study for Nine Polish Regions: Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Łódzkie, Lubelskie, Małopolskie, Mazowieckie, Śląskie, Świętokrzyskie, Wielkopolskie, Zachodniopomorskie Final Report Part II 30 April 2014 DISCLAIMER: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Sole responsibility for the views, interpretations or conclusions contained in this document lies with the authors. No representation or warranty express or implied will be made and no liability or responsibility is or will be accepted by the European Investment Bank or the European Commission in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document and any such liability is expressly disclaimed. This document is provided for information only. Neither the European Investment Bank nor the European Commission gives any undertaking to provide any additional information or correct any inaccuracies in it. | P a g e 2014-2020 JESSICA Evaluation Study for Nine Polish Regions 139 2014-2020 JESSICA Evaluation Study for Nine Polish Regions: Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Łódzkie, Lubelskie, Małopolskie, Mazowieckie, Śląskie, Świętokrzyskie, Wielkopolskie, Zachodniopomorskie Part II Submitted to: European Investment Bank Date: 7 April 2014 Version: Final Report Report completed by: Regional Project Managers: Cezary Gołębiowski, Marta Mackiewicz, Jacek Goliszewski, and Jan Fido Report reviewed by: Agnieszka Gajewska, Project Team Leader and Lily Vyas, JESSICA Programme Manager Report approved by: Bob Green, Partner, Mazars ©Mazars LLP. All rights reserved April 2014. This document is expressly provided by Mazars LLP to and solely for the use of the EIB and must not be quoted from, referred to, used by or distributed to any other party without the prior consent of the EIB.
    [Show full text]
  • OPOLE REGION and CENTRAL MORAVIA on the Trail of the Common Heritage of the Polish-Czech Borderland OPOLE REGION and CENTRAL MORAVIA
    EN active recreation cultural heritage promotional natural events heritage OPOLE REGION AND CENTRAL MORAVIA On the trail of the common heritage of the Polish-Czech borderland OPOLE REGION AND CENTRAL MORAVIA On the trail of the common heritage of the Polish-Czech borderland cultural heritage natural cultural natural heritage heritage heritage active recreation active promotional recreation events The brochure has been created within the project Cultural and Natural Heritage for the Development of Polish-Czech Borderland „Common Heritage” which is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund as part of the Programme INTERREG V-A Czech Republic – Poland and from the resources of the Self-Government of the Opolskie Voivodeship. promotional events Opolska Regionalna Organizacja Turystyczna ul. Żeromskiego 3 OPOLE REGION AND CENTRAL Ordering Party 45-053 Opole tel. +48 77 44 12 521 MORAVIA http://orot.pl On the trail of the common heritage of the Magdalena Budkiewicz Text Dominika Borówka-Sitnik Polish-Czech borderland Jolanta Sieradzka-Kasprzak Piotr Mielec Hundreds of monuments, unique museums, and a rich cul- Content Alicja Mroczek supervision Adam Krzyżanowski tural life, accompanied by a picturesque landscape and Adam Kraska priceless nature, create an extraordinary combination Jarosław Małkowski / BANKFOTO Archive of the Opole Regional Tourist Organisation and its members which attracts thousands of tourists every year. Where can Archive of the project Partner Střední Morava – Sdružení cestovního ruchu Portal www.dabrowskieskarby.pl – s.11 you find all this? On the Polish-Czech borderland: in the re- Prudnicki Ośrodek Kultury – s. 17 Miejski Ośrodek Sportu i Rekreacji w Opolu – s. 18 gion of Opole and Central Moravia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rury I Czuby.Pdf
    Rury i Czuby Rury Lublin Historia dzielnic W 700. rocznicę lokacji miasta „Lublin. 700-lecie. Spis treści Historia dzielnic” – redakcja serii: Środowisko przyrodnicze (J. Rodzoś, P. Mroczek) Dominik Szulc, Hubert Mącik Archeologia o dziejach Rur (R. Niedźwiadek) „Rury i Czuby” – redaktorzy Rury w XVI-XVIII wieku (J. Chachaj, K. Jakimowicz) zeszytu: Dominik Szulc, Jacek Szpital Św. Ducha w Lublinie (D. Prucnal) Chachaj, Hubert Mącik Rury w XX wieku (E. Rzeczkowska) Redakcja techniczna: Dominik Szulc Wydano w ramach serii wydaw- niczej Lubelskiego Towarzystwa Wstęp Genealogicznego „Historia Micra- Historia Magna” – redakcja: Oddajemy w Państwa ręce efekt pracy zespołu interdyscyplinar- Mariusz Ausz, Dominik Szulc nego, skupiającego historyków, archeologów, geografów i historyków sztuki. W każdym zeszycie planowanej przez nas serii znajdziecie Pań- stwo teksty poświęcone ważniejszym okresom w dziejach danej dziel- nicy czy osiedla obecnego Lublina. W ramkach umieszczonych na marginesie tekstu podajemy wy- jaśnienia nie tylko terminów specjalistycznych, które dla większości mieszkańców Lublina mogą nie być zrozumiałe, ale także krótkie in- formacje o niektórych historycznych wsiach. Wszystkie ona oznaczono w tekście głównym grubszą czcionką (np. dziesięcina, Mętów). Konsekwentnie stosujemy tu jednak jasne kryteria doboru wyja- śnianych terminów i nazw. Nie podajemy bowiem informacji o wszyst- kich wymienionych w tekście głównym miejscowościach. Przede wszystkim pomijamy historyczne wsie, które dały początek obecnym dzielnicom i osiedlom Lublina (np. Wrotków), gdyż te wyczerpująco zostaną opisane w innych zeszytach serii. Następnie pomijamy wsie lub miasta leżące w większej odległości od Lublina, choćby leżały w ziemi lubelskiej. Tym samym skupiamy się na wsiach odległych obec- Na okładce: Zespół pawilonów nie o kilka-kilkanaście kilometrów od Lublina, zaś podając ważniejsze handlowo-usługowych na Osiedlu informacje o nich ograniczamy się tylko do daty pierwszej wzmianki, Słowackiego, l.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Official Names of Localities and Their Parts” Was Published in Poland
    UNITED NATIONS GROUP OF EXPERTS WORKING PAPER ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES NO. 18/9 Twenty-ninth session Bangkok, Thailand, 25 – 29 April 2016 Item 9 of the Provisional Agenda Activities Relating to the Working Group on Toponymic Data Files and Gazetteers List of official names of localities in Poland (2015 edition) Submitted by Poland* ___________ * Prepared by Maciej Zych (Commission on Standardization of Geographical Names Outside the Republic of Poland). List of official names of localities in Poland (2015 edition) Summary In October 2015 the second edition of the “List of official names of localities and their parts” was published in Poland. The previous edition of the “List...” was published in 2012. The list was published on the basis of the “Act on official names of localities and physiographic objects”, which entered into force in 2003. This act regulates, among others, rules and procedures for establishing, changing and abolishing official names of localities and their parts, as well as the manner of establishing and publishing lists of official names of localities and their parts. The “List of official names of localities and their parts” contains 103,086 official names of localities and their parts, including: 915 names of towns and cities, 43,068 names of villages, 6,710 names of parts of towns and cities, 36,263 names of parts of villages, 5,132 names of hamlets, and 4,619 names of hamlets of villages. The list is arranged in a table with eight columns: the name of locality is indicated in the first column; in the second column – officially established type of locality; in the third, fourth and fifth columns – affiliation to an administrative unit: commune, county, and voivodship; in the sixth column – the identifier of locality from the National Official Register of the Territorial Division of the Country (TERYT); in the seventh column – genitive ending for names of localities; in the eighth column – adjective (only for names of towns and villages).
    [Show full text]
  • Subnational Government, Enshrined in the Constitution
    EUROPE POLAND UNITARY COUNTRY BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS INCOME GROUP: HIGH INCOME LOCAL CURRENCY: ZLOTY (PLN) POPULATION AND GEOGRAPHY ECONOMIC DATA Area: 306 194 km 2 GDP: 1 105.9 billion (current PPP international dollars), i.e. 28 784 dollars per inhabitant Population: 38.422 million inhabitants (2017), i.e. 0.0% per year (2017) (2010-2015) Real GDP growth: 4.8% (2017 vs 2016) Density: 123 inhabitants / km 2 Unemployment rate: 4.9% (2017) Urban population: 60.1% of national population Foreign direct investment, net inflows (FDI): 10 673 (BoP, current USD millions, 2017) Urban population growth: -0.1% (2017 vs 2016) Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF): 17.7% of GDP (2017) Capital city: Warsaw (4.6% of national population) HDI: 0.865 (very high), rank 33 (2017) MAIN FEATURES OF THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK The Republic of Poland is a unitary parliamentary democracy, with a President as Head of State elected directly by the people to serve for five years, a Prime Minister appointed by the President as Head of Government and a bicameral Parliament (Sejm). The upper house (Chambers of Envoys) has 460 members and the lower house, the Senate has 100 members, all elected by direct election for a four-year term. Neither the upper or lower house directly represent local and regional governments. However, the rules pertaining to the procedures of both assemblies oblige them to consult local and regional governments during the legislative process, in particular through the Association of Polish Counties and the Association of Polish Cities. The principle of decentralisation is enshrined in Article 15 of the 1997 Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish Toponymic Guidelines Isbn 83-900969-2-7
    THE POLISH TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES ISBN 83-900969-2-7 THE POLISH TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES THE NATIONAL GEODETIC AND CARTOGRAPHIC SERVICE SURVEYOR GENERAL OF POLAND Warsaw 1993 Contents Introductory note ................................... .. 3 I. Organizations dealing with standardization of geographical names. '. c. • •• ••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••.•••.• •• 5 II. Toponymic situation in Poland after World War II. ..... .. 6 III. The most important sets of geographical names of Poland.. 10 IV. The principles applied at standardizing geographical names of Poland. .................................... .. 15 V. Geographical and settlement terms. .................. 19 VI. The Polish alphabet. ............................ .. 25 VII. Polish geographical names pronunciation guide. ....... .. 26 Introductory note Following the advice ofthe United Nations Organization the Polish toponymic guidelines for editors of maps and other publications in Poland and abroad have been worked out. They were prepared by professor Kazimierz Rymut from the Institute of the Polish Language of the Polish Academy ofSciences in Cracow, head ofthe Commission for Establishing Names ofLocalities and Physiographic Objects at the Council ofMinisters' Office. The guidelines are meant to provide helpfor people andinstitutions dealing with the study ofgeographical names not professionally, but using them in their publishing and cartographic activities. The issue has been approached on broad terms, the following having been touched upon: organizations and institutions dealing in Poland
    [Show full text]