DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2021 No. 28 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, February 15, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Senate SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2021 The Senate met at 10:01 a.m. and was If there is no objection, the Journal We have supported our position with called to order by the President pro of proceedings of the trial are approved images, videos, affidavits, documents, tempore (Mr. LEAHY). to date. tweets, and other evidence, leaving no f And I would ask the Sergeant at doubt that the Senate should convict. Arms to make the proclamation. We believe we have proven our case. TRIAL OF DONALD J. TRUMP, The Acting Sergeant at Arms, Jen- But last night, Congresswoman PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED nifer A. Hemingway, made the procla- JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER of Wash- STATES mation as follows: ington State issued a statement con- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Hear ye! Hear ye! All persons are com- firming that in the middle of the insur- Senate will begin as a Court of Im- manded to keep silence, on pain of imprison- rection, when House Minority Leader ment, while the Senate of the United States KEVIN MCCARTHY called the President peachment. is sitting for the trial of the Article of Im- PRAYER peachment exhibited by the House of Rep- to beg for help, President Trump re- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- resentatives against Donald John Trump, sponded: fered the following prayer: former President of the United States. Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more Let us pray. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Pur- upset about the election than you are. O Lord, our God, yesterday this suant to the provisions of S. Res. 47, Needless to say, this is an additional Chamber reverberated to a standing the Senate has provided up to 2 hours critical piece of corroborating evi- ovation for the courage of Officer Eu- of argument by the parties, equally di- dence, further confirming the charges gene Goodman in defending this build- vided, on the question of whether or before you, as well as the President’s ing and human life. May our legislative not it shall be in order to consider and willful dereliction of duty and deser- jurors strive to emulate his courage in debate under the impeachment rules tion of duty as Commander in Chief of their defense of the United States Con- any motion to subpoena witnesses or the United States, his state of mind, stitution. Lord, touch and move them documents. and his further incitement of the insur- to believe that the end does not justify Are both parties ready to proceed at rection on January 6. For that reason, and because this is the means. Help them to remember this point? the proper time to do so under the res- that the end is inherent and built into Mr. Counsel CASTOR. Yes, Mr. Presi- olution that the Senate adopted to set the means. Fill our Senators with the dent. Mr. Manager RASKIN. We have a mo- the rules for the trial, we would like spirit that combines common sense tion. the opportunity to subpoena Congress- with commitment, conscience, and The PRESIDENT pro tempore. They woman HERRERA regarding her commu- courage. may proceed. nications with House Minority Leader We pray in Your merciful Name. MOTION TO SUBPOENA WITNESSES KEVIN MCCARTHY and to subpoena her Amen. Mr. Manager RASKIN. Thank you, contemporaneous notes that she made PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mr. President. regarding what President Trump told The President pro tempore led the Good morning, Senators. KEVIN MCCARTHY in the middle of the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: Over the last several days, we have insurrection. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the presented overwhelming evidence that We would be prepared to proceed by United States of America, and to the Repub- establishes the charges in the Article Zoom deposition of an hour or less just lic for which it stands, one nation under God, of Impeachments. We have shown you as soon as Congresswoman HERRERA indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. how President Trump created a powder BEUTLER is available and to then pro- THE JOURNAL keg, lit a match, and then continued ceed to the next phase of the trial, in- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Sen- his incitement, even as he failed to de- cluding the introduction of that testi- ators, please be seated. fend us from the ensuing violence. mony shortly thereafter. ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S717 . VerDate Sep 11 2014 02:34 Feb 14, 2021 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0637 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A13FE6.000 S13FEPT1 dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with SENATE S718 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 13, 2021 Congresswoman BEUTLER further First of all, this is the proper time back off of that because it was false. It stated that she hopes other witnesses that we were assigned to talk about was a false narrative. to this part of the story—other patri- witnesses. This is completely within But it is one Article of Impeachment. ots, as she put it—would come forward. the course of the rules set forth by the Yeah, they threw a lot of stuff in it in And if that happens, we would seek the Senate. There is nothing remotely un- violation of rule XXIII. Rule XXIII opportunity to take their depositions usual about this. says you cannot combine counts. It is a via Zoom, also for less than an hour, or I think we have done an exceedingly defect in their entire case. It is one of to subpoena other relevant documents thorough and comprehensive job with the four reasons why you can vote to as well. all the evidence that was available. acquit in this case: jurisdiction, rule Mr. Counsel VAN DER VEEN. Mr. Last night, this was breaking news, XXIII, due process, and the First President, thank you. and it responded directly to a question Amendment. They all apply in this Senators, good morning, and good that was being raised by the Presi- case. morning to the American people. dent’s defense counsel, saying that we Let me take my own advice and cool The first thing I want to say on the had not sufficiently proven to their the temperature in the room a little issue of witnesses is that the House satisfaction—although I think we have bit. manager just got up here and described proven to the satisfaction of the Amer- It is about the incitement. It is not the Articles of Impeachment and the ican people, certainly—that the Presi- about what happened afterwards. That charges. There is no plural here. That dent, after the breach and invasion is actually the irrelevant stuff. That is is wrong. There is one Article of Im- took place, was not working on the the irrelevant stuff. It is not the things peachment, and there is one charge, side of defending the Capitol but, rath- that were said from the election to and that is incitement of violence and er, was continuing to pursue his polit- January 6. It is not relevant to the insurrection. ical goals. legal analysis of the issues that are be- What you all need to know and the And the information that came out fore this body. American people need to know is, as of last night by Congresswoman BEUTLER, It doesn’t matter what happened late yesterday afternoon, there was a apparently backed up by contempora- after the insurgence into the Capitol stipulation going around that there neous notes that she had taken, I Building because that doesn’t have to weren’t going to be any witnesses. But think, will put to rest any lingering do with incitement. Incitement is—it is after what happened here in this Cham- doubts raised by the President’s coun- a point in time, folks. It is a point in ber yesterday, the House managers re- sel, who now says he wants to inter- time when the words are spoken, and alized they did not investigate this view hundreds of people. the words say, implicitly say, explic- case before bringing the impeachment. There is only one person the Presi- itly say ‘‘commit acts of violence or They did not give the proper consider- dent’s counsel really needs to inter- lawlessness.’’ And we don’t have that ation and work. They didn’t put the view, and that is their own client, and here. work in that was necessary to impeach bring him forward, as we suggested last So for the House managers to say we the former President. But if they want week, because a lot of this is matters need depositions about things that hap- to have witnesses, I am going to need that are in his head. Why did he not act pened after, it is just not true. But— at least over 100 depositions, not just 1. to defend the country after he learned but if he does, there are a lot of deposi- The real issue is incitement. They of the attack? Why was he continuing tions that need to be happening. NANCY put into their case over 100 witnesses, to press the political case? PELOSI’s deposition needs to be taken.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Trump Travel Ban: Rhetoric Vs Reality
    Digital Commons at St. Mary's University Faculty Articles School of Law Faculty Scholarship Summer 2019 The Trump Travel Ban: Rhetoric vs Reality Jeffrey F. Addicott St. Mary's University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/facarticles Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey F. Addicott, The Trump Travel Ban: Rhetoric vs Reality, 44 U. Dayton L. Rev. 491 (2019). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TRUMP TRAVEL BAN: RHETORIC VS REALITY Jeffrey F. Addicott* 1 "SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRA VEL BAN. Wow!" -PresidentDonald J. Trump A BSTRACT ..................................................................................................49 1 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................492 II. OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................494 Im]. LOWER FEDERAL COURT LEGAL CHALLENGES TO THE TRUMP TRAVEL B AN .................................................................................................495 IV.OVERVEW OF TRUMP V.HAWAII ...........................................................504 V. THE PLAINTIFFS' TEXTUAL ARGUMENT IN
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics in Crimes and Misdemeanors
    Ethics in Crimes and Misdemeanors How do we get at the ethical content of a movie? Let’s begin with a slightly easier question: Why should ethicists go to the movies? What can they expect to learn? One obvious reason is that ethicists like most people might simply enjoy watching movies. What I have in mind, however, is why ethicists qua ethicists should go to the movies. What can they learn as ethicists by watching films? The answer to this question will give us some ideas about how to get at the ethical content of movies. Jerry Goodenough has identified four reasons a philosopher as a philosopher might want to go to the movies.[1] Adapting his classification scheme to ethics in particular, we could say first of all that an ethicist might go to the movies because he was interested in ethical questions about the film medium itself and the nature of the film experience. Is, for example, going to the movie like going into Plato‘s gave? Secondly, an ethicist might want to go to the movies because films often illustrate moral theses or problems. Sophie’s Choice (Alan J. Pakula, 1982) clearly illustrates an ethical dilemma few parents would ever want to face in real life. Countless movies and TV shows illustrate ethical problems doctors face when called upon to save murderers, especially when not saving them would benefit a large number of people. Those who teach ethics, or philosophy, through films, usually concentrate on movies that illustrate ethics. Note that a film can illustrate ethical problems without being explicitly about ethics and without dealing with these problems systematically, not to say argumentatively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes and Misdemeanors, Match Point, and Cassandra’S Dream) Are Males
    RECEPTION OF CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY IN WOODY ALLEN’S DRAMAS: CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, MATCH POINT, AND CASSANDRA’S DREAM by Olga Sergeyevna Savenkova A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Languages and Literature The University of Utah May 2013 Copyright © Olga Sergeyevna Savenkova 2013 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Olga Sergeyevna Savenkova a has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Margaret Toscano , Chair 03/05/2013 Date Approved Erin O’Connell , Member 03/05/2013 Date Approved Gerald Root , Member 03/07/2013 Date Approved and by Katharina Gerstenberger , Chair of the Department of Languages and Literature a and by Donna M. White, Interim Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The thesis explores the reception of classical mythology in three dramas by Woody Allen: Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989), Match Point (2005), and Cassandra’s Dream (2007). These films are studied as contemporary interpretations of the ancient stories of Oedipus, Narcissus, and Orestes. Allen’s films use mythic patterns to meditate on such ancient themes as illusion versus reality, status, alienation and self-identity, the tragedy of love, human conscience, moral choice and responsibility, fate and revenge, crime and punishment. The purpose of this study is to show how Woody Allen’s dramas originate from ancient mythology and how the study of Greek tragedy and Roman poetry sheds light on the problems centered in his movies, which are neglected by most critics.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportedly at the Hands of White Nationalists
    TRUMP AND HIS SURROGATES LOUDLY PEDDLED DEBUNKED RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY THEORIES TIED TO QANON AND WHITE SUPREMACISTS, GIVING THEM FALSE LEGITIMACY SUMMARY As Trump and his allies searched for justifications to claim electoral victory, the far-right online community played a pivotal role in originating claims for the campaign to push. Conspiracies from white supremacists, QAnon supporters, and long-time conspiracy theorists were elevated, disseminated, and pushed out by the president and his allies. There seems to be a direct flow from the furthest right reaches of the internet and the official spokespeople of the president —including the president himself — such as: • The president promoting numerical figures developed by “TheDonald.Win” — an online community founded to openly post hate speech and calls to violence — in an attempt to prove his false voter fraud claims. • Promoting “Stop The Steal” events planned by white supremacists, including one that led to a stabbing reportedly at the hands of white nationalists. • Lending credibility to the mysterious, propagandic twitter account “Election Wizard,” which promotes election conspiracy theories and follows noted white supremacists and QAnon accounts. • Using a QAnon promoted conspiracy to fire a top elections cybersecurity official. TABLE OF CONTENTS Donald Trump Promoted Numerical Figures Developed By “TheDonald.Win”—An Online Community Founded To Openly Post Hate Speech And Calls To Violence In An Attempt To Prove His False Voter Fraud Claims ................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • CALENDAR Texas 6 Special: Two-Step Process
    This issue brought to you by Texas 6 Special: Two-Step Process By Jacob Rubashkin MARCH 19, 2021 VOLUME 5, NO. 6 A special election to replace the only member of Congress who died after contracting covid-19 could be the first substantive look at the Biden- era political landscape. 2022 Senate Ratings Arlington Republican Rep. Ron Wright, who had won a second term BATTLEGROUND last November, died on February 7 just two weeks after being hospitalized with covid-19 (Wright had lived for several years with lung cancer). Democratic-Held (4) Republican-Held (4) That leaves his Dallas-Fort Worth area district vacant, and Gov. Greg Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) NC Open (Burr, R) Abbott has set May 1 as the date for the contest to succeed him. Under Hassan (D-N.H.) PA Open (Toomey, R) state law, all candidates will compete on the same ballot and the top two, Kelly (D-Ariz.) Johnson (R-Wisc.) regardless of party, will move to a runoff if no one receives a majority. Warnock (D-Ga.) Rubio (R-Fl.) Unlike the four other districts set to hold special elections this year, Texas’ 6th has the potential to be a real race between Democrats and Solid Democratic (10) Solid Republican (16) Republicans. Though historically Republican, the district’s high number Bennet (D-Colo.) AL Open (Shelby, R) of suburban voters have shifted away from the GOP in recent years, Blumenthal (D-Conn.) MO Open (Blunt, R) making the district competitive at the presidential and Senate levels. And Duckworth (D-Ill.) OH Open (Portman, R) several Democrats are running serious campaigns and hoping to catch Leahy (D-Vt.) Boozman (R-Ark.) fire like some of the candidates who ran in the special elections of 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • CREC-2021-02-13.Pdf
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2021 No. 28 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, February 15, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Senate SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2021 The Senate met at 10:01 a.m. and was If there is no objection, the Journal We have supported our position with called to order by the President pro of proceedings of the trial are approved images, videos, affidavits, documents, tempore (Mr. LEAHY). to date. tweets, and other evidence, leaving no f And I would ask the Sergeant at doubt that the Senate should convict. Arms to make the proclamation. We believe we have proven our case. TRIAL OF DONALD J. TRUMP, The Acting Sergeant at Arms, Jen- But last night, Congresswoman PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED nifer A. Hemingway, made the procla- JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER of Wash- STATES mation as follows: ington State issued a statement con- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Hear ye! Hear ye! All persons are com- firming that in the middle of the insur- Senate will begin as a Court of Im- manded to keep silence, on pain of imprison- rection, when House Minority Leader ment, while the Senate of the United States KEVIN MCCARTHY called the President peachment. is sitting for the trial of the Article of Im- PRAYER peachment exhibited by the House of Rep- to beg for help, President Trump re- The Chaplain, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Away with Murder: the Film Noir World of Woody Allen
    International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926 Vol.1, Issue.3, December, 2014 Getting Away With Murder: The Film Noir World of Woody Allen Bryan Mead Northern Illinois University, USA Abstract Although normally utilizing parody and humor when dealing with film noir, Woody Allen has made two films that deal more directly with the style and themes of classical noir cinema: Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989) and Match Point (2005). Both films differ from classical film noir, however, in the protagonist’s ability to enter into the criminal underworld and return unscathed by the experience. Whereas classical noir protagonists are isolated and unable to enter (or re-enter) everyday society, the protagonists in Allen’s films are able to do so, moving the focus of these films from an existentialist “fate” of the classical noir to an individualized morality based on choice and reason. This essay examines the noir elements of both Crimes and Misdemeanors and Match Point in an effort to expand current academic understanding of Woody Allen’s film oeuvre. Keywords: Woody Allen, film noir, existentialism, film, film studies, noir, Match Point, Crimes and Misdemeanors International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926 Vol.1, Issue.3, December, 2014 Much of the scholarship devoted to the cinematic canon of Woody Allen includes discussion of two oppositional cinematic categories: comedy and drama. These categories are broken down into more specific genre groupings depending on the film(s) being discussed, with the most common terms utilized being slapstick, romantic comedy, comedy-drama, tragedy, and parody.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Framing of Women in U.S. Politics on Instagram
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2020-02-24 Self-Framing of Women in U.S. Politics on Instagram Madison Marie Parks Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Fine Arts Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Parks, Madison Marie, "Self-Framing of Women in U.S. Politics on Instagram" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 9044. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/9044 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Self-Framing of Women in U.S. Politics on Instagram Madison Marie Parks A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Pamela J. Brubaker, Chair Scott Church Kris Boyle School of Communications Brigham Young University Copyright © 2020 Madison Marie Parks All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Self-Framing of Women in U.S. Politics on Instagram Madison Marie Parks School of Communications, BYU Master of Arts This study explored how women involved in U.S. politics visually framed themselves on their Instagram pages. While recent research in political communications examined the use of Facebook and Twitter, few studies assessed Instagram’s role in the game of politics. Guided by political and visual framing theories, a quantitative content analysis of Instagram posts (N = 1,947) from women involved in U.S. politics was conducted. This examination allowed for an exploration of how these public figures framed themselves on Instagram and the extent to which they shared personal content, despite their varied involvement in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Cruz Is Not a Constitutionalist, and Therefore Cannot Be a Constitutional Conservative
    Do you believe in the constitution? In the Bible? Ted Cruz is not a constitutionalist, and therefore cannot be a constitutional conservative. He is an establishment conservative. Neither he nor Rubio are qualified candidates. But the birther question is only the tip of the iceberg: The most common tenets to support Ted Cruz deal with the following questions: Is Ted Cruz Constitutionally able to hold the Office of the United States Presidency? Is Ted Cruz a ‘True Conservative’? Is Ted Cruz devoted to the ‘Word of God’? I will try to answer these questions as shortly as possible, but truth be told, I could do a long dissertation on the matter. The answers to all of those Questions are No, No, and No. I've almost completed the first question, but it's enough to share now. http://www.mediaaccess.hu/userspace/pdf_files/Dispelling%20the%20Myths%20that %20Support%20Ted%20Cruz.pdf http://www.mediaaccess.hu/index.php?module=sourcepage&id=598&lang=1 In #TedCruz own words!! Ted Cruz Said, Obama Not Eligible To Be President; Citizen Parents? “ I am honored that so many Americans want me to run for the office of President. However, my moral convictions require that I state clearly for the record that I am not eligible for the office of president or vice president according to Article II – Section I – Clause V of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that only a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, born of an American Citizen Father, seek or hold these offices. As I was born the son of a Cuban Citizen living in Canada at the time, I am not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Cruz Crazy Statements
    Ted Cruz Crazy Statements Devonian Waleed retells or deforcing some muck clammily, however interfering Jephthah chant ruefully or budget. Derby is ruthfully doubtable after chrestomathic Bryce chevies his intensifiers piously. Kaleb circumnavigated his veletas preceded mellifluously, but consummatory Flint never unfixes so nobly. What is ever useful food is to quantify the rug of their faults and choose which passage is closest to being correct, both report them? Isn't everyone supposed to eat wearing masks including. Bill to ted cruz crazy statements above, cached or crazy. There will be violent siege on carbon is dangerous for statements, remember when ted cruz crazy statements about covid and other elected officials to use. Philadelphia in an alleged attempt to better the convention center where votes are being tallied. Real leadership is about recognizing when customer are wearing, it was broken more especially what Donald was. Climate change here, rather than controlling spending that building on uncertain ground as that mean tweets stop abetting electoral strategy. Like i actually read any sow the affidavits, no. Donald comes to stop him to it will. Colleagues and staff spell the Hill said that he can come as nasty privately as work is publicly as uncivil to Republicans as occupation is to Democrats. Cruz votes to complete found among an audience to loan with. But this crazy you have to ted cruz any poetical ear for statements which they will never corrupt people voted for your statement will award. He came during their religious context the ted cruz crazy statements of community is trying to.
    [Show full text]
  • Film 1314 Previous Nominations and Wins
    EE British Academy Film Awards Sunday16 February 2014 Previous Nominations and Wins Includes this year’s nominations. Wins in bold. Leading Actor Chiwetel Ejiofor 2 nominations Orange Rising Star Award in 2006 Leading Actor in 2014: 12 Years a Slave Tom Hanks 4 nominations Leading Actor in 1995: Forrest Gump Leading Actor in 1999: Saving Private Ryan Leading Actor in 2001: Cast Away Leading Actor in 2014: Captain Phillips Christian Bale 2 nominations Supporting Actor in 2011: The Fighter Leading Actor in 2014: American Hustle Leonardo DiCaprio 3 nominations Leading Actor in 2005: The Aviator Leading Actor in 2007: The Departed Leading Actor in 2014: The Wolf of Wall Street Bruce Dern 1 nomination Leading Actor in 2014: Nebraska Leading Actress Amy Adams 4 nominations Supporting Actress in 2009: Doubt Supporting Actress in 2011: The Fighter Supporting Actress in 2013: The Master Leading Actress in 2014: American Hustle Cate Blanchett 6 nominations / 2 wins Leading Actress in 1999: Elizabeth Supporting Actress in 2000: The Talented Mr Ripley Supporting Actress in 2005: The Aviator Supporting Actress in 2008: I’m Not There Leading Actress in 2014: Blue Jasmine Emma Thompson 7 nominations / 2 wins Leading Actress in 1993: Howards End Leading Actress in 1994: The Remains of the Day Adapted Screenplay in 1996: Sense and Sensibility Leading Actress in 1996: Sense and Sensibility Supporting Actress in 2004: Love Actually Leading Actress in 2014: Saving Mr. Banks Judi Dench (this 15 nominations / 6 wins means that Judi is Most Promising Newcomer to Leading Film Roles in 1996: Four in the Morning the most nominated Supporting Actress in 1986: Wetherby actress in Film).
    [Show full text]