ATA July BI-2-REV2.qxd 6/29/07 9:55 PM Page 30

Nigerian 419 E-Mail Scams By Keiran Dunne

Continuing the series on cyber security that began in the April 2007 issue of The ATA Chronicle, this Taking full advantage of modern communications article will focus on e-mail messages that attempt to defraud innocent vic- technology, perpetrators indiscriminately send large tims using variants of the so-called “Nigerian 419 scam,” a form of volumes of e-mail “invitations” to anonymous named after the section of the Nigerian penal code that it violates. potential “investors.”

The 419 Scam: Advance Fee Fraud by Another Name Advance fee fraud is a variation of your account?’ The sums involved costs, or a requirement that the a centuries-old trick are usually in the millions of dol- “investor” must have a certain amount whereby victims are persuaded to pro- lars, and the investor is promised a of money on deposit in an interna- vide money with the promise of real- large share, often 40%. The pro- tional bank in order to process the izing substantially larger returns.1 posed deal is often presented as a transaction, and so forth. Whatever Taking full advantage of modern com- ‘harmless’ white-collar , in the reason, once the money is munications technology, perpetrators order to dissuade participants from advanced to the 419 scammer(s), it is indiscriminately send large volumes later contacting the authorities. never seen again and the transaction is of e-mail “invitations” to anonymous Similarly, the money is often said to never concluded. potential “investors.” The mechanics be the embezzled funds of a recently In other variants of the 419 of the scam are relatively simple: deposed or killed dictator.”2 scheme, perpetrators agree to pur- chase goods from a victim to whom “The ‘investors’ are contacted, typ- Once the “investor” agrees to the they provide a counterfeit payment ically with an offer such as ‘A rich deal, he or she is typically asked to instrument worth more than the total person from the needy country advance a certain amount of money. transaction. The perpetrators then ask needs to discreetly move money The ostensible justification for this the victim to forward a portion of the abroad, would it be possible to use request might be a loan to help defray proceeds to an escrow agent or

30 The ATA Chronicle July 2007 ATA July BI-2-REV2.qxd 6/29/07 9:56 PM Page 31

shipper after the funds have cleared. automatically assume that they are out as spam. Since it is both inexpen- In the U.S., national banks generally immune from advance fee scams. On sive and easy to send millions of mes- make funds for non-local checks the contrary, some scammers appear to sages at a time, perpetrators can make available within five business days.3 specifically target translators and inter- handsome profits even if only a tiny In this way, funds may become avail- preters. In the translation- or interpre- percentage of users agree to a shady able to the account holder days or tation-related 419 scam scenario, a advance fee deal. However, as noted even weeks before the institution in perpetrator masquerades as a client and earlier, not all 419 messages are indis- criminate spam. Some fraudsters appear to target practitioners of spe- cific professions. The perpetrators of advance fee fraud are Consequences of E-Mail Scams According to the 2006 Internet nothing if not creative, and translators and Crime Report published by the National White Collar Crime Center interpreters should not automatically assume and the Federal Bureau of that they are immune from advance fee scams. Investigation, more than 86,000 com- plaints of criminal were filed in the U.S. in 2006, with a total dollar loss of $198.4 million. The report also notes that “of those indi- which they have been deposited learns proposes to sign a contract for a fairly viduals who reported a dollar loss, the that the payment is fraudulent. Thus, substantial translation or interpretation highest median losses were found by the time the fraudulent instrument job. The perpetrator also insists on among Nigerian letter fraud has been identified as such, the making payment in full up front (pre- ($5,100).”4 This latter figure repre- requested payment has already been sumably using a fraudulent payment sents “an increase of $100 per inci- made to the escrow agent or shipper, instrument). In the event that a trans- dent compared with 2005 levels, and and the victim finds himself or herself lator or interpreter accepts such a con- an increase of $2,100 per incident liable for the payment. tract and deposits the payment compared with 2004.”5 Along similar lines, some advance instrument, the scammer will cancel Statistics compiled by the Dutch fee scammers send victims a check the project and request a refund of 80- 419 watchdog group Ultrascan sug- and ask them to deposit it and wire a 90% of the original payment, the dif- gest that 419 scams are a veritable percentage to a third party to whom ference being offered as a token worldwide scourge. According to money is owed. The scammers “gen- “compensation” for the inconvenience. Ultrascan: erously” give a portion of the pro- In the past two years, the North- ceeds of the check (10-20%) to the east Ohio Translators Association • Of all check fraud reported, over 80% victims to “thank” them for their (www.notatranslators.org), of which is Nigerian advance fee fraud-related. assistance. Once again, by the time the author is a member, has received the fraud is discovered, it is too late, several inquiries for “projects” that • Of all counterfeit checks inter- and instead of receiving 10-20% of bore all the hallmarks of such scams. cepted by law enforcement, 76% the proceeds of the (bad) check, the In addition to check fraud, 419 (global 2006) were found, sent, or victims discover that they are liable scams also include lottery scams, non- received by a Nigerian 419 for 100% of the money that has been delivery fraud, auction fraud, as well advance fee fraudster. wired to the third party—and prob- as last will and testament and inheri- ably for bank fees assessed on the tance scams. • 95% of all lottery scams are Nigerian bounced check. 419 advance fee fraud-based. The perpetrators of advance fee Where Do These fraud are nothing if not creative, and Messages Come From? • 91% of last will and testament and translators and interpreters should not Most 419 scam messages are sent inheritance scams are per- ➡

The ATA Chronicle July 2007 31 ATA July BI-2-REV2.qxd 6/29/07 9:56 PM Page 32

Nigerian 419 E-Mail Scams Continued

petrated by Nigerian 419 advance fee fraud organizations.6 Additional Reading

From Detection to Prevention “Welcome to the World of Scambaiting!” (2007). Unfortunately, we cannot prevent www.419eater.com unscrupulous individuals from sending us scam “invitations.” Cruickshank, Douglas. “I Crave Your Distinguished Indulgence However, we can take steps to mini- (and All Your Cash)” (August 17, 2001). http://archive.salon.com/ mize the number of such messages people/feature/2001/08/07/419scams/print.html that actually make it to our inbox. Following all of the recommended “The ‘Nigerian’ Scam: Costly .” Federal Trade Com- best practices discussed in the first mission Consumer Alerts (Federal Trade Commission, 2007). article in this series is a good start (see www.ftc.gov/bcp/ conline/pubs/alerts/nigeralrt.htm “Spam—It Isn’t Just for Breakfast Any More” on page 21 of The ATA Mikkelson, Barbara, and David P. Mikkelson. “Nigerian Scam.” Urban Chronicle, April 2007). In addition, Legends Reference Pages (2003). www.snopes.com/crime/fraud/ we must remain vigilant. Advance fee nigeria.asp fraud and Nigerian 419 scam warning signs include the following: Silver Lake Editors. Scams & Swindles: , Spoofing, ID , Nigerian Advance Schemes Investment : How to • The e-mail makes references to Recognize and Avoid Rip-Offs in the Internet Age (Los Angeles: actual persons, places, and events. Silver Lake Publishing, 2006). The e-mail may mention respectable businesses, organiza- Tive, Charles. 419 Scam: Exploits of the Nigerian Con Man (Lagos: tions, and/or governments, and the Chicha Favours, 2006). sender may refer by name to actual people associated with these organ- izations. Verification of this infor- mation will confirm that it is true and accurate; however, the proposi- tion itself is bogus.

• The e-mail contains inappropriate • The e-mail contains poor spelling, • The content of the e-mails fails the channels of communication. punctuation, and/or grammar. common-sense litmus test. Notification of lottery winnings or of an inheritance windfall will be made by a total stranger via e-mail, instead of by registered mail with return receipt requested, by phone, If a proposition sounds too good to be true, or some other appropriate means of personal notification. it probably is.

• The e-mail provides inappropriate contact information. The sender will claim to work for a bank or • The e-mail contains ingratiating Conclusion: If It Sounds too large company, but use a free praise from the sender—a total Good to be True, It Probably Is e-mail account; the sender will stranger—about the recipient’s As noted earlier, U.S. victims of provide a cell phone number character, integrity, and discretion. 419 scams lost $5,100 each on instead of a land line; and so forth. average in 2006. In order to avoid

32 The ATA Chronicle July 2007 ATA July BI-2-REV2.qxd 6/29/07 9:56 PM Page 33

4. Internet Crime Report: January 1, More than 86,000 complaints of criminal Internet fraud 2006–December 31, 2006 (National were filed in the U.S. in 2006, with a total dollar White Collar Crime Center and The Federal Bureau of Investigation, loss of $198.4 million. 2007),3. www.ic3.gov/media/annual report/2006_IC3Report.pdf

5. Rosenberg, Eric. “U.S. Internet following their example, it is incum- Initiatives to Slam Multi-million Fraud at All-Time High. ‘Nigerian’ bent upon us to recognize these Dollar Scams” (March 15, 2002 Scam and Other Cost advance fee e-mail scams for what press release). www.treasurer.gov.au/ $198.4 Million.” San Francisco they are. In addition, it is very impor- parlsec/content/pressreleases/2002/ Chronicle (March 31, 2007). www. tant to step back and look at the big 013.asp sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi? picture. How likely is it that someone file=/c/a/2007/03/31/MNGSCOVG would contact a total stranger by 2. “Advance Fee Fraud.” Wikipedia, GI1.DTL e-mail to request assistance con- the Free Encyclopedia (March 20, ducting financial transactions worth 2007). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 6. “419 Unit AFF Statistics & hundred of thousands or even millions Nigerian_419 Estimates” (Ultrascan, March 20, of dollars? The bottom line is that if a 2007). www.ultrascan.nl/html/419_ proposition sounds too good to be 3. Assistance for Customers of statistics.html true, it probably is. National Banks (Washington, DC: Office of the Comptroller of the Notes Currency, 2005), 11. 1. Various sources assert that the Nigerian 419 scam is nothing more than the modern incarnation of the “” scam, whose origins the sources situate with pre- cision in 1588, although they do not indicate the basis for this date. See, for instance, the press release announcing the naming of the Honorable Senator Ian Campbell to Quick Links the post of parliamentary secretary to the treasurer of Australia. “Part of the difficulty in shutting down scams is that they invariably crop up Federal Bureau of Investigation again in slightly different forms. For www.fbi.gov example, today’s Nigerian Scam, where a consumer receives a letter Federal Trade Commission or an e-mail from a fictitious www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/nigeralrt.htm Nigerian exile wanting to transfer millions of dollars, is just a variation National White Collar Crime Center on scam which www.nw3c.org dates back to 1588. The only differ- ence is that the original scam used parchment and the promise of a hidden treasure chest.” “New

The ATA Chronicle July 2007 33