• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Quantum backflow in a ring Arseni Goussev School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3HF, United Kingdom (Dated: February 25, 2021) Free motion of a quantum particle with the wave function entirely comprised of plane waves with non-negative momenta may be accompanied by negative probability current, an effect called quantum backflow. The effect is weak and fragile, and has not yet been observed experimentally. Here we show that quantum backflow becomes significantly more pronounced and more amenable to experimental observation if, instead of letting the particle move along a straight line, one forces it to move in a circular ring. I. INTRODUCTION is the so-called Bracken-Melloy bound. Finding the exact value of cline remains an open challenge. It is interesting The probability density of a quantum particle may flow to note that cline is independent of the time window T , in the direction opposite to that of the particle's momen- the particle's mass µ, or Planck's constant ~. tum [1, 2], an effect called quantum backflow (QB) [3] [4]. Many questions related to QB have been addressed The effect is inconceivable from the viewpoint of classi- in the literature. These include QB against a constant cal physics, and in this respect can be paralleled with force [7], the pertinence of QB to the arrival-time prob- other genuinely quantum phenomena such as tunneling lem [8{11], position dependence of the backflow cur- or Schr¨odinger'scat states. Unlike the latter, however, rent [5, 12, 13], probability backflow in relativistic quan- QB is relatively unexplored and yet to be observed ex- tum systems [14{16], QB in escape problems [17, 18], and perimentally. QB in many-particle systems [19]. Recently, the prob- The QB effect can be formulated as follows. Consider lem of QB has been generalized to states with position- a nonrelativistic particle moving freely along a straight momentum correlations [20]. line, the x-axis. Let the particle's wave function be com- As of today, QB has not been experimentally observed prised only of plane waves p1 eikx with nonnegative mo- 2π in any true quantum system [21]. One of the difficul- menta, ~k 0, so that at time t the wave function reads ties hindering experimental observation of QB is a rela- ≥ 1 ikx tively small value of cline [22]. As pointed out in Ref. [3], Z 2 e (x; t) = dk φ(k)e−i~k t=2µ ; (1) one natural strategy for detecting QB would be to work 0 p2π with an electrically charge particle, for which a mea- where µ is the particle's mass, and φ(k) is a complex- surement of the probability current is equivalent to that R 1 2 of the electric current. If the charge of the particle is valued function normalized according to 0 dk φ(k) = +1 j j q (for concreteness taken to be positive) and the cur- 1 = R dx (x; t) 2. The associated probability cur- −∞ j j rent measurement time is T , then the magnitude of the rent j (x; t) is given by detected backflow electric current approximately equals q R T=2 ~ ∗ @ T −T=2 dt j , which cannot exceed clineq=T . The fact j = Im : (2) − µ @x that cline is less than 4% hampers the direct detection of the backflow current. The QB effect consists in the fact that j can be negative, for some x and t, in spite of the particle's momentum Another obstacle to observing QB experimentally is being nonnegative with certainty. In other words, even the difficulty of preparing a state with an appreciable though the momentum of a particle is pointing \to the backflow current. Theoretical considerations show [23] right", the probability density can (locally in space and that states whose integrated backflow current is close to the Bracken-Melloy bound, c , are characterized by in- arXiv:2008.08022v2 [quant-ph] 24 Feb 2021 time) flow \to the left"; this is clearly impossible in the line classical world. finite position width and infinite mean energy, and there- One of the most surprising features of QB is that the fore are not realizable in a laboratory setting. The value effect has a nontrivial dimensionless scale associated with of the integrated backflow current seems to become signif- it: The probability current through a given point, say x = icantly smaller than cline if one restricts their attention to 0, integrated over an arbitrary time window, T=2 < t < the states with a finite position width and/or finite mean T=2, has a (finite) greatest lower bound. More− precisely energy (see Refs. [3, 24] for some examples), although no [3, 5, 6], systematic study of this question has yet been carried out. Z T=2 In this paper we show that the QB effect becomes much inf dt j (0; t) = cline ; (3) −T=2 − more pronounced and more amenable to experimental in- vestigation when considered for a quantum particle mov- where ing in a circular ring. In particular, we show that, for the cline 0:0384517 (4) particle-in-a-ring system, the integrated backflow current ' 2 can be over three times larger than the Bracken-Melloy The Schr¨odingerequation, probability density, and prob- bound, and that the corresponding backflow maximizing ability current are invariant under the gauge transforma- state has finite energy (and, by construction, finite spa- tion β β + @χ and Ψ eiχΨ, where χ(θ) is an ar- ! @θ ! tial extent). Some space-related aspects of QB in systems bitrary real function. Eigenstates m and eigenenergies with rotational motion, such as an electron in a constant Em of the Hamiltonian satisfy H m = Em m and are magnetic field, have been addressed in Ref. [25] and very given by recently in Ref. [26]. Here however we are interested in imθ 2 the time-dependence of QB, and more specifically look e ~ 2 m(θ) = ;Em = (m β) (m Z) : for states maximizing the integrated backflow current. p2π 2µR2 − 2 (10) The set of eigenstates is orthonormal and complete. II. PARTICLE IN A RING All Hamiltonian eigenstates m with m β , where is the ceiling function, have nonnegative≥ d e (gauge- We consider a nonrelativistic particle of mass µ con- invariant)d·e kinetic angular momentum and probability strained to move in a circular ring of radius R. The ring current. Indeed, m is an eigenstate of the kinetic an- lies in the xy-plane of a Cartesian coordinate frame and gular momentum operator ~(`z β) with the eigenvalue − is centered around the origin. The unit vectors along ~(m β) 0, and the probability current corresponding − ≥ ~ the x-, y- and z-axes are denoted by e , e , and e , re- to m is J = 2 (m β) 0. Now, in the spirit of x y z m 2πµR − ≥ spectively. The triplet (ex; ey; ez) is right-handed. We the original QB problem, we consider states Ψ(θ; t) com- further assume that the particle has an electric charge prised of the Hamiltonian eigenstates with nonnegative q, for concreteness taken to be positive, and that there kinetic angular momentum: is a constant spatially-uniform magnetic field B pointing 1 along the z-axis, i.e., B = Bez. X −iEmt= The particle is described by a time-dependent wave Ψ(θ; t) = cm m(θ)e ~ ; (11) function Ψ(θ; t), where θ is the polar angle between ex m=dβe and the position radius vector of the particle. The wave function is periodic, Ψ(θ + 2π; t) = Ψ(θ; t), and satisfies where, in view of Eq. (7), complex amplitudes cm satisfy @Ψ the normalization condition the Schr¨odingerequation i~ @t = HΨ with the Hamilto- nian [27, 28] 1 X 2 2 cm = 1 : (12) ~ 2 j j H = (`z β) ; (5) m=dβe 2µR2 − The corresponding probability current is obtained by @ where `z = i , so that ~`z is the projection of the substituting Eq. (11) into Eq. (9), and reads − @θ canonical angular momentum on ez. Here, 1 2 ~ X qR B JΨ(θ; t) = (m + n 2β) β = (6) 2µR2 − 2~c m;n=dβe ∗ ∗ i(Em−En)t=~ is the dimensionless magnetic flux through the ring, with cmcn m(θ) n(θ)e : (13) 2 × c denoting the speed of light. (A constant term ~ has 8µR2 We now focus on the probability current through a to be added to the Hamiltonian, Eq. (5), if the latter is fixed point on the ring, say θ = 0, integrated over a time derived using the Dirac method [27]. This term however window T=2 < t < T=2, and define the dimensionless plays no role in the context of the present work.) The quantity− wave function is normalized to unity, T=2 Z 2π Z dθ Ψ(θ; t) 2 = 1 : (7) PΨ = dt JΨ(0; t) : (14) −T=2 0 j j The probability density, Ψ(θ; t) 2, satisfies the continuity Substituting Eqs. (13) and (10) into Eq. (14), and eval- equation: j j uating the time integral, we find 2 1 @ Ψ @JΨ X ∗ j j + = 0 ; (8) PΨ = c Kmncn (15) @t @θ m m;n=dβe where JΨ(θ; t) is the probability current, defined as with @Ψ β J = ~ Im Ψ∗ ~ Ψ 2 : (9) α Ψ 2 2 Kmn = (m+n 2β) sinc α(m+n 2β)(m n) : (16) µR @θ − µR j j π − − − 3 Here, 0.4 0.1 T = − α = ~ (17) β 4µR2 0.3 0.075 β = − is a (positive) dimensionless parameter, and the sinc 0.2 sin z 1) 0.05 , β = function is defined as sinc z = z if z = 0 and sinc 0 = 1.

Load more

  6

Copy Link