Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in the Texas High Plains
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in the Texas High Plains 2012 Final Report Submitted to Plains Cotton Growers Plains Cotton Improvement Program Dr. Mark Kelley , Extension Agronomist-Cotton Mr. Chris Ashbrook, Extension Assistant-Cotton Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center Lubbock, TX February, 2013 Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in the Texas High Plains 2012 Final Report Submitted to Plains Cotton Growers Plains Cotton Improvement Program Dr. Mark Kelley Extension Agronomist-Cotton Mr. Chris Ashbrook Extension Assistant Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center Lubbock, TX February, 2013 Trade names of commercial products used in this report are included only for better understanding and clarity. Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Texas A&M System is implied. Readers should realize that results from one experiment do not represent conclusive evidence that the same response would occur where conditions vary. Extension programs serve all people regardless of socioeconomic level, race, color, sex, religion, disability, or national origin. The Texas A&M System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the following for their support of this project: Plains Cotton Growers - Plains Cotton Improvement Program and Cotton Incorporated - Texas State Support for funding Systems Variety Test Producer-Cooperators: Mark and David Appling - Blanco Rickey Bearden - Plains Mark and Ryan Williams- Farwell USDA-ARS Researcher: Dr. John Wanjura - USDA-ARS, Lubbock Companies: All-Tex, Americot/NexGen, Bayer CropScience (FiberMax and Stoneville), Delta and Pine Land/Monsanto, Dyna-Gro, PhytoGen, Croplan Genetics, Syngenta, Chemtura, NuFarm Americas Inc. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Specialists and Assistants: Dr. Jason Woodward - Extension Pathologist Mr. Colton Smith - Extension Assistant Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Agents: Curtis Preston, CEA-AG/NR, Bailey County Monti Vandiver, EA-IPM, Bailey/Parmer Counties Kerry Siders, EA-IPM, Cochran/Hockley Counties Caitlin Jackson, CEA-AG/NR, Crosby County Dustin Patman, EA-IPM, Crosby/Floyd Counties Gary Roschetzky, CEA-AG/NR, Dawson County Tommy Doederlein, EA-IPM, Dawson/Lynn Counties Ethan Fortenberry, CEA-AG/NR, Floyd County Gary Cross, EA-AG/NR, Hale County Mark Brown, CEA-AG/NR, Lubbock County Bryan Reynolds, CEA-AG/NR, Lynn County Benji Henderson, CEA-AG/NR, Parmer County David Graf, EA-AG/NR, Swisher County Chris Bishop, CEA-AG/NR, Terry County ii Scott Russell, EA-IPM, Terry/Yoakum Counties JW Wagner, CEA-AG/NR, Yoakum County Marcel Fischbacher, CEA-AG/NR, Moore County Jody Bradford, CEA-AG/NR, Carson County Brandon McGinty, CEA-AG/RF, Gray County Brad Easterling, CEA-AG/NR, Sherman County Scott Strawn, CEA-AG/NR, Ochiltree County Texas A&M AgriLife Research: Dr. Jane Dever Dr. Terry Wheeler Mr. Jim Bordovsky Mr. Casey Hardin Dr. Danny Carmichael Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute - Texas Tech University: Dr. Eric Hequet Ms. Kathy Martin Texas Department of Agriculture - Food and Fibers Research For funding of HVI analyses iii Table of Contents Title page.................................................................. i Acknowledgments............................................................ i i Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties.................................................1 Summary.............................................................1 Introduction...........................................................2 Materials and Methods..................................................2 Site Information........................................................3 Results..............................................................5 Summary and Conclusions...............................................7 Acknowledgments......................................................8 Tables...............................................................9 Additional Replicated Irrigated Large Plot Demonstrations. .......................2 0 Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Chris Bass, Mueshoe, TX - 2012 ...................................2 1 Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration David Crump, Ralls, TX - 2012.....................................2 7 Replicated LEPA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration AG-CARES, Lamesa, TX - 2012....................................3 3 Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Texas AgriLife Research Center, Halfway, TX - 2012. 4 1 Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Mike Henson, Ropesville, TX - 2012.................................4 9 Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Rhett Mimms, Acuff, TX - 2012.....................................5 7 Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Luke Steelman, Bovina, TX - 2012 ..................................6 5 iv Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Cody Gruhlkey, Kress, TX - 2012 ...................................7 3 Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Keith Harrison, Brownfield, TX - 2012. 8 1 Replicated LEPA Supplemental (Limited) Irrigation Cotton Variety Research Trial Cheuvront Farms, Seminole, TX - 2012.. 8 9 Texas Panhandle Cotton Variety Trials........................................................9 4 Summary............................................................9 4 Introduction..........................................................9 5 Materials and Methods.................................................9 6 Site Information.......................................................9 6 Results.............................................................9 8 Summary and Conclusions.............................................100 Acknowledgments....................................................102 Tables.............................................................103 Replicated Dryland Large Plot Demonstrations.................................111 Replicated Dryland RACE Variety Demonstration Gary Nixon, Floydada, TX - 2012 ..................................112 Replicated Dryland Cotton Variety Trial Cody Walters, Loop, TX - 2012 ....................................119 2012 Sites Planted but Lost Due to Weather....................................124 Replicated Dryland Systems Variety Demonstration Rickey Bearden, Plains, TX - 2012.................................125 Replicated Dryland RACE Variety Demonstration Rickey Bearden, Plains, TX - 2012.................................126 Replicated Dryland Systems Variety Demonstration Mark and David Appling, Blanco, TX - 2012.. 127 v Replicated Dryland RACE Variety Demonstration Mark and David Appling, Blanco, TX - 2012.. 128 Replicated Dryland RACE Variety Demonstration AG-CARES, Lamesa, TX - 2012...................................129 Replicated Furrow Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Kevin Acker, Dimmitt, TX - 2012...................................130 Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Variety Demonstration Charles Ashbrook, Tahoka, TX - 2012 . 131 Irrigation Management Research Results......................................132 Subsurface Drip Irrigation Pre-plant Irrigation Timing Effects on Germination and Cotton Yield Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Halfway, TX, James P. Bordovsky. 133 Comparison of Cotton Germination Among Three SDI Fields During the Drought of 2011 Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Halfway, TX, James P. Bordovsky. 134 Effects of Variable In-Season Irrigation Capacity on Cotton Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Halfway, TX, James P. Bordovsky. 135 Disease Ratings and Verticillium Wilt Variety Testing............................136 Response of commercially available cotton varieties to Verticillium wilt, Bacterial blight, root-knot nematodes, and Fusarium wilt Terry Wheeler/Jason Woodward, Lubbock, TX. 137 Verticillium wilt variety test results Terry Wheeler/Jason Woodward, Lubbock, TX, 2012. 140 2012 Texas High Plains Production and Weather................................150 Evaluating Field Trial Data..................................................156 vi Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties January 2013 Dr. Mark Kelley, Extension Agronomist - Cotton Mr. Chris Ashbrook, Extension Assistant - Cotton Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Lubbock, TX Characteristics commonly evaluated in small-plot testing include lint yield, turnout percentages, fiber quality, and earliness. Current small-plot variety testing programs are inadequate in scale and design to investigate the economic impact of new transgenic varieties with value-added traits. The objective of this project was to evaluate the profitability of cotton varieties in producers' fields in the Texas High Plains. Three replications of each variety were included at the Farwell and Plains locations with four replications at the Blanco location. At harvest, plot weights were determined using a boll buggy with integral electronic scales. Grab samples were taken from each plot for ginning and fiber quality analysis. In 2012, yields were below what would normally be expected due to continued drought conditions across the Texas High Plains region. A total of three irrigated locations were initiated in 2012. These locations included Blanco, Farwell, and Plains,