DOCSLIB.ORG

Reflections on a Revision of the Definition of the EU SME

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reflections on a Revision of the Definition of the EU SME Reflections on a Revision of the Definition of the EU SME Crehan, Patrick December 2020 This publication is a report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Union concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Contact information Name: James P. Gavigan Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Edificio Expo, Calle Inca Garcilaso, 3, 41092 Seville, Spain Email: [email protected] Tel.: +34 9544 88409 EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC123296 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-28301-0 doi:10.2760/602855 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Union, 2020 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Except otherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This means that reuse is allowed provided appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. All content © European Union 2020 How to cite this report: Crehan, P., Reflections on a Revision of the Definition of the EU SME, Gavigan J. editor, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-28301-0, doi:10.2760/602855, JRC123296. Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 The Case for Revising the Definition of the SME in Europe ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 The EU Definition ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 The EVCA Challenge .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 The Business Europe Challenge ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 A Need for Clarity ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2 Other Approaches to Small Business Size Standards ......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 The Definition of Medium Sized Business in Italy ..................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 The 50+ Definitions of Small Business Used Around the World ................................................................................................ 10 2.3 The Many Definitions of Small Business Employed in the USA ................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 The History of Size Standards in Small Business Set-Aside ......................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Size Standards for Small Business Set-Aside by Sector and Over Time .......................................................... 12 2.3.3 The 2019 Revision and Methods Used .............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.3.4 Size Standards for the SBIR Program................................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3.5 Access by Small VC-backed Business to the SBIR Program ......................................................................................... 15 2.3.6 Access by Small VC-Backed Business to the PPP Program ........................................................................................... 15 2.3.7 The New SBA Rules of Affiliation and Criteria for Independent Ownership and Control .................. 17 3 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 The Possibility of Multiple SME standards applied in EU Programs ........................................................................................ 18 3.2 The Public Interest Served by SMEs and the VC Industry .................................................................................................................. 18 3.3 The Purpose and Application of Rules relating to Ownership and Control ........................................................................ 19 3.4 Exceptions to the General SME definition in the US and Europe ................................................................................................ 20 3.5 Suggested Ways to Proceed .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 List of abbreviations and definitions ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Annex 1: Ambiguous Language ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Annex 2: Legal Persons, Natural Person and Partnerships ............................................................................................................................ 25 Annex 3: Stress Testing the EU Definition of the SME ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Where the SME is a Parent Company ........................................................................................................................................................................ 27 When the SME is a Subsidiary or Affiliate ............................................................................................................................................................ 28 When the SME is backed by a VC or PE Fund .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Annex 4: The LP-GP Relationship ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 LP-GP Agreements ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 i Tensions in LP-GP relations ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mergers and Acquisitions - Collar Contracts
    Mergers and Acquisitions - Collar Contracts An Chen University of Bonn joint with Christian Hilpert (University of Bonn) Seminar at the Institute of Financial Studies Chengdu, June 2012 Introduction Model setup and valuation Value change through WA Welfare analysis Traditional M&A deals Traditional M&A deals: two main payment methods to the target all cash deals: fixed price deal stock-for-stock exchange: fixed ratio deal Risks involved in traditional M&A transactions: Pre-closing risk: the possibility that fluctuations of bidder and target stock prices will affect the terms of the deal and reduce the likelihood the deal closes. Post-closing risk: after the closing the possible failure of the target to perform up to expectations, thus resulting in overpayment ⇒ major risk for the shareholders of the bidder An Chen Mergers and Acquisitions - Collar Contracts 2 Introduction Model setup and valuation Value change through WA Welfare analysis Pre-closing instruments: Collars Collars were introduced to protect against extreme price fluctuations in the share prices of bidder and target: Fixed price collars and fixed ratio collars Collar-tailored M&A deals have both characteristics of traditional all-cash or stock-for-stock deals. Collars can be used by bidders to cap the payout to selling shareholders An Chen Mergers and Acquisitions - Collar Contracts 3 Introduction Model setup and valuation Value change through WA Welfare analysis Fixed price collar (taken from Officer (2004)) First Community Banccorp Inc. - Banc One Corp., 1994, with K = 31.96$, U = 51$, L = 47$, a = 0.6267, and b = 0.68. 34 33 32 Payoff 31 30 29 44 46 48 50 52 54 Bidder stock price An Chen Mergers and Acquisitions - Collar Contracts 4 Introduction Model setup and valuation Value change through WA Welfare analysis Fixed ratio collar (taken from Officer (2004)) BancFlorida Financial Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest-Rate Caps, Collars, and Floors
    November 1989 Interest-Rate Caps, Collars, and Floors Peter A. Abken As some of the newest interest-rate risk management instruments, caps, collars, and floors are the subject of increasing attention among both investors and analysts. This article explains how such instruments are constructed, discusses their credit risks, and presents a new approach for valuing caps, collars, and floors subject to default risk. 2 ECONOMIC REVIEW, NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1989 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis November 1989 ince the late 1970s interest rates on all types of fixed-income securities have What Is an Interest-Rate Cap? Sbecome more volatile, spawning a va- riety of methods to mitigate the costs associ- An interest-rate cap, sometimes called a ceil- ated with interest-rate fluctuations. Managing ing, is a financial instrument that effectively interest-rate risk has become big business and places a maximum amount on the interest pay- an exceedingly complicated activity. One facet ment made on floating-rate debt. Many busi- of this type of risk management involves buying nesses borrow funds through loans or bonds on and selling "derivative" assets, which can be which the periodic interest payment varies used to offset or hedge changes in asset or according to a prespecified short-term interest liability values caused by interest-rate move- rate. The most widely used rate in both the caps ments. As its name implies, the value of a de- and swaps markets is the London Interbank rivative asset depends on the value of another Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is the rate offered asset or assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Caps and Floors (MMA708)
    School of Education, Culture and Communication Tutor: Jan Röman Caps and Floors (MMA708) Authors: Chiamruchikun Benchaphon 800530-4129 Klongprateepphol Chutima 820708-6722 Pongpala Apiwat 801228-4975 Suntayodom Thanasunun 831224-9264 December 2, 2008 Västerås CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………. (i) Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1 Caps and caplets……………………………………………………………...... 2 Definition…………………………………………………………….……. 2 The parameters affecting the cap price…………………………………… 6 Strategies …………………………………………………………………. 7 Advantages and disadvantages..…………………………………………. 8 Floors and floorlets..…………………………………………………………… 9 Definition ...……………………………………………………………….. 9 Advantages and disadvantages ..………………………………………….. 11 Black’s model for valuation of caps and floors……….……………………… 12 Put-call parity for caps and floors……………………..……………………… 13 Collars…………………………………………..……….……………………… 14 Definition ...……………………………………………………………….. 14 Advantages and disadvantages ..………………………………………….. 16 Exotic caps and floors……………………..…………………………………… 16 Example…………………………………………………………………………. 18 Numerical example.……………………………………………………….. 18 Example – solved by VBA application.………………………………….. 22 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………. 26 Appendix - Visual Basic Code………………………………………………….. 27 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………. 30 ABSTRACT The behavior of the floating interest rate is so complicate to predict. The investor who lends or borrows with the floating interest rate will have the risk to manage his asset. The interest rate caps and floors are essential tools
    [Show full text]
  • Interest Rate Caps, Floors and Collars
    MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY COURSE SEMINAR DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS ANALYTICAL FINANCE II – MT1470 RESPONSIBLE TEACHER: JAN RÖMAN DATE: 10 DECEMBER 2004 Caps, Floors and Collars GROUP 4: DANIELA DE OLIVEIRA ANDERSSON HERVÉ FANDOM TCHOMGOUO XIN MAI LEI ZHANG Abstract In the course Analytical Finance II, we continue discuss the common financial instruments in OTC markets. As an extended course to Analytical Finance I, we go deep inside the world of interest rate and its derivatives. For exploring the dominance power of interest rate, some modern models were derived during the course hours and the complexity was shown to us, exclusively. The topic of the paper is about interest rate Caps, Floors and Collars. As their counterparts in the equity market, as Call, Put options and strategies. We will try to approach the definitions from basic numerical examples, as what we will see later on. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 2. CAPS AND CAPLETS................................................................................................... 2 2.1 CONCEPT.......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 PRICING INTEREST RATE CAP ......................................................................................... 3 2.3 NUMERICAL EXAMPLE .................................................................................................... 4 2.4 PRICING
    [Show full text]
  • OPTION-BASED EQUITY STRATEGIES Roberto Obregon
    MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP BOSTON MA CHICAGO IL MIAMI FL PORTLAND OR SAN DIEGO CA LONDON UK OPTION-BASED EQUITY STRATEGIES Roberto Obregon MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP 100 Lowder Brook Drive, Suite 1100 Westwood, MA 02090 meketagroup.com February 2018 MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP 100 LOWDER BROOK DRIVE SUITE 1100 WESTWOOD MA 02090 781 471 3500 fax 781 471 3411 www.meketagroup.com MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP OPTION-BASED EQUITY STRATEGIES ABSTRACT Options are derivatives contracts that provide investors the flexibility of constructing expected payoffs for their investment strategies. Option-based equity strategies incorporate the use of options with long positions in equities to achieve objectives such as drawdown protection and higher income. While the range of strategies available is wide, most strategies can be classified as insurance buying (net long options/volatility) or insurance selling (net short options/volatility). The existence of the Volatility Risk Premium, a market anomaly that causes put options to be overpriced relative to what an efficient pricing model expects, has led to an empirical outperformance of insurance selling strategies relative to insurance buying strategies. This paper explores whether, and to what extent, option-based equity strategies should be considered within the long-only equity investing toolkit, given that equity risk is still the main driver of returns for most of these strategies. It is important to note that while option-based strategies seek to design favorable payoffs, all such strategies involve trade-offs between expected payoffs and cost. BACKGROUND Options are derivatives1 contracts that give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset at a given point in time and at a pre-determined price.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors and Impacts in the Information Society a Prospective Analysis in the Candidate Countries
    FACTORS AND IMPACTS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES REPORT ON ROMANIA Authors: Alexandru Caragea, Radu Gheorghiu, and Geomina Turlea The authors of this report are solely responsible for the content, style, language and editorial control. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. January, 2003 Technical Report EUR 21279 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre (DG JRC) Institute for Prospective Technological Studies http://www.jrc.es Legal notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. Technical Report EUR 21279 EN © European Communities, 2004 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Spain 2 FACTORS AND IMPACTS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS IN THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES Acknowledgements Acknowledgements: We are indebted to RALUCA MIRON (Raiffaisen Bank), for her valuable contribution to this work. REPORT ON ROMANIA 3 Preface Preface The Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) of the Directorate General Joint Research Centre of the European Commission contracted the International Centre for Economic Growth, European Centre (ICEG EC) to act as the coordinator of a consortium of 11 research institutes to carry out this project. The main objective of the project was to provide a series of national monographs studying the development of the Information Society (IS), including both the positive and negative impacts, in each of the candidate countries. These monographs offer an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each country regarding the development of IS, and a view on their possible outcomes; both strongly rooted in factual quantitative data.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivative Valuation Methodologies for Real Estate Investments
    Derivative valuation methodologies for real estate investments Revised September 2016 Proprietary and confidential Executive summary Chatham Financial is the largest independent interest rate and foreign exchange risk management consulting company, serving clients in the areas of interest rate risk, foreign currency exposure, accounting compliance, and debt valuations. As part of its service offering, Chatham provides daily valuations for tens of thousands of interest rate, foreign currency, and commodity derivatives. The interest rate derivatives valued include swaps, cross currency swaps, basis swaps, swaptions, cancellable swaps, caps, floors, collars, corridors, and interest rate options in over 50 market standard indices. The foreign exchange derivatives valued nightly include FX forwards, FX options, and FX collars in all of the major currency pairs and many emerging market currency pairs. The commodity derivatives valued include commodity swaps and commodity options. We currently support all major commodity types traded on the CME, CBOT, ICE, and the LME. Summary of process and controls – FX and IR instruments Each day at 4:00 p.m. Eastern time, our systems take a “snapshot” of the market to obtain close of business rates. Our systems pull over 9,500 rates including LIBOR fixings, Eurodollar futures, swap rates, exchange rates, treasuries, etc. This market data is obtained via direct feeds from Bloomberg and Reuters and from Inter-Dealer Brokers. After the data is pulled into the system, it goes through the rates control process. In this process, each rate is compared to its historical values. Any rate that has changed more than the mean and related standard deviation would indicate as normal is considered an outlier and is flagged for further investigation by the Analytics team.
    [Show full text]
  • Securities Litigation & White Collar Defense
    New York | Washington D.C. | London | cahill.com Securities Litigation & White Collar Defense Cahill lawyers have been on the front lines of large-scale securities litigation for nearly a century, focusing on the leading issues of the day. Recent matters include the alleged manipulation of the US Dollar London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other reference rates, and multi-billion dollar federal and state court class and individual actions involving subprime and structured finance products (including RMBS, CDO, REMIC, SIV and trust preferred securities), as well as "dark pools” and high-frequency trading. Our recent caseload has also included victories in significant securities actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, including a unanimous jury verdict in the trial of a nationwide securities class action alleging fraud in a bond offering. Our Securities Litigation & White Collar Defense practice is top-ranked by Chambers USA, The Legal 500 and Benchmark Litigation. In 2019, Law360 recognized Cahill’s Securities practice as a Practice Group of the Year and two Cahill partners for their achievements in White Collar. We have handled some of the most significant regulatory and enforcement matters for global banks and transnational companies. Our lawyers have extensive experience conducting multinational investigations involving alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulations, other commercial anti-bribery laws and the Bank Secrecy Act. We also have a long track record of conducting antitrust and price fixing investigations in markets including healthcare, pharmaceuticals, automotive, paper products, homebuilding and tobacco. We are also called upon to assist in resolving complex financial disputes through alternative dispute resolution and in private proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • List of British Entities That Are No Longer Authorised to Provide Services in Spain As from 1 January 2021
    LIST OF BRITISH ENTITIES THAT ARE NO LONGER AUTHORISED TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN SPAIN AS FROM 1 JANUARY 2021 Below is the list of entities and collective investment schemes that are no longer authorised to provide services in Spain as from 1 January 20211 grouped into five categories: Collective Investment Schemes domiciled in the United Kingdom and marketed in Spain Collective Investment Schemes domiciled in the European Union, managed by UK management companies, and marketed in Spain Entities operating from the United Kingdom under the freedom to provide services regime UK entities operating through a branch in Spain UK entities operating through an agent in Spain ---------------------- The list of entities shown below is for information purposes only and includes a non- exhaustive list of entities that are no longer authorised to provide services in accordance with this document. To ascertain whether or not an entity is authorised, consult the "Registration files” section of the CNMV website. 1 Article 13(3) of Spanish Royal Decree-Law 38/2020: "The authorisation or registration initially granted by the competent UK authority to the entities referred to in subparagraph 1 will remain valid on a provisional basis, until 30 June 2021, in order to carry on the necessary activities for an orderly termination or transfer of the contracts, concluded prior to 1 January 2021, to entities duly authorised to provide financial services in Spain, under the contractual terms and conditions envisaged”. List of entities and collective investment
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Book
    Table of Contents Program 5 Speakers 9 NOAH Infographic 130 Trading Comparables 137 2 3 The NOAH Bible, an up-to-date valuation and industry KPI publication. This is the most comprehensive set of valuation comps you'll find in the industry. Reach out to us if you spot any companies or deals we've missed! March 2018 Edition (PDF) Sign up Here 4 Program 5 COLOSSEUM - Day 1 6 June 2018 SESSION TITLE COMPANY TIME COMPANY SPEAKER POSITION Breakfast 8:00 - 10:00 9:00 - 9:15 Between Tradition and Digitisation: What Old and New Economy can Learn from One Another? NOAH Advisors Marco Rodzynek Founder & CEO K ® AUTO1 Group Gerhard Cromme Chairman Facebook Martin Ott VP, MD Central Europe 9:15 - 9:25 Evaneos Eric La Bonnardière CEO CP 9:25 - 9:35 Kiwi.com Oliver Dlouhý CEO 9:35 - 9:45 HomeToGo Dr. Patrick Andrae Co-Founder & CEO FC MR Insight Venture Partners Harley Miller Vice President CP 9:45 - 9:55 GetYourGuide Johannes Reck Co-Founder & CEO MR Travel & Tourism Travel 9:55 - 10:05 Revolution Precrafted Robbie Antonio CEO FC MR FC 10:05 - 10:15 Axel Springer Dr. Mathias Döpfner CEO 10:15 - 10:40 Uber Dara Khosrowshahi CEO FC hy Christoph Keese CEO CP 10:40 - 10:50 Moovit Nir Erez Founder & CEO 10:50 - 11:00 BlaBlaCar Nicolas Brusson MR Co-Founder & CEO FC 11:00 - 11:10 Taxify Markus Villig MR Founder & CEO 11:10 - 11:20 Porsche Sebastian Wohlrapp VP Digital Business Platform 11:20 - 11:30 Drivy Paulin Dementhon CEO 11:30 - 11:40 Optibus Amos Haggiag Co-Founder & CEO 11:40 - 11:50 Blacklane Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern California Regional Intelligence Center 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14Th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 [email protected], [email protected]
    VIA EMAIL Daniel J. Mahoney Deputy Director and Privacy Officer Northern California Regional Intelligence Center 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 [email protected], [email protected] March 17, 2021 RE: California Public Records Act Request Dear Mr. Mahoney, This letter constitutes a request under the California Public Records Act Cal. Gov. Code § 6250 et seq. and is submitted by the Electronic Privacy Information Center. EPIC requests records related to the Northern California Regional Information Center’s (NCRIC) monitoring of protests and use of advanced surveillance technologies. Background The summer of 2020 saw large protests across the country in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. Polls conducted between June 4 and June 22, 2020 estimate that between 15 million and 26 million people attended protests nationwide, marking 2020’s protests as the largest in American history.1 2020 was also a high-water mark for police surveillance of protesters, with reports of aerial and drone surveillance, widespread use of video recording and facial recognition, cellular surveillance, and social media surveillance appearing in news stories across the nation.2 Fusion centers played a prominent role in surveilling protesters, providing advanced tools like facial recognition and social media monitoring to local police.3 The BlueLeaks documents, records 1 Larry Buchanan, Quoctrung Bui, and Jugal K. Patel, Black Lives Matter May Be the Largest Movement in U.S. History, N.Y. Times (July 3, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd- protests-crowd-size.html. 2 See e.g., Zolan Kanno-Youngs, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomberg Briefs
    Wednesday June 8, 2016 www.bloombergbriefs.com MedMen Seeks $100 Million for Marijuana Investments QUOTED BY AINSLIE CHANDLER, BLOOMBERG BRIEF Medical cannabis management company MedMen is raising its first institutional fund "This is the toughest decision- as it tries to capitalize on investors' interest in legal marijuana enterprises. making environment that I MedMen is trying to raise $100 million for MedMen Opportunity Fund, according to think we have ever been in.... firm founder and Chief Executive Adam Bierman. Yesterday, JPMorgan comes MedMen, founded in 2009, previously acted as a management company for out and they say there is a 36 businesses with medical marijuana licenses. It also invested money from family offices and venture funds in special purpose vehicles where the investors held the cannabis percent chance of a licenses, Bierman said in a May 26 interview. recession. As a CIO or head Existing investors pushed the firm to raise a fund to allow for greater diversification in of private equity, what do you their portfolios, he said. do with that?" “If you are a multi-billion dollar family office or an institutional quality investor, you are — Glenn Youngkin, President and COO of not making one-off investments in the $3 million to $5 million range with single-asset Carlyle Group, at a conference June 7 exposure in a market that is complicated from a regulatory environment,” Bierman said. The Los Angeles-based firm held a first close on the WEEK IN NUMBERS fund in May and hopes to have a final close within six months, Bierman said. $13.5 billion — Extra return MedMen The fund will invest in cannabis-related projects, he Calstrs calculates it earned from its said.
    [Show full text]