DOCSLIB.ORG

Cosmological Implications of Light Element Abundances: Theory DAVID N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cosmological Implications of Light Element Abundances: Theory DAVID N Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 4782-4788, June 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a colloquium entitled "Physical Cosmology," organized by a committee chaired by David N. Schramm, held March 27 and 28, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Cosmological implications of light element abundances: Theory DAVID N. SCHRAMM Astronomy and Astrophysics Centers 140, The University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; and National Aeronautic and Space Administration/Fermilab Astrophysics Center, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510-0500 ABSTRACT Primordial nucleosynthesis provides (with number of neutrino families and its subsequent verification the microwave background radiation) one of the two quanti- by the Large Electron Positron Collider (LEP) and the tative experimental tests of the hot Big Bang cosmological Stanford Linear Collider (SLC). model (versus alternative explanations for the observed Hubble Also discussed is the possibility that a first-order quark- expansion). The standard homogeneous-isotropic calculation hadron phase transition could have produced variations from fits the light element abundances ranging from 'H at 76% and the standard homogeneous model. It will be shown that 4He at 24% by mass through 2H and 3He at parts in 105 down contrary to initial indications, first-order quark-hadron- to 7Li at parts in 1010. It is also noted how the recent Large inspired results are consistent with the homogeneous model Electron Positron Collider (and Stanford Linear Collider) results. results on the number of neutrinos (N,,) are a positive labora- Finally, a discussion of the recent B and Be observations tory test of this standard Big Bang scenario. The possible in Population (Pop) II stars will be made. It will be shown that alternate scenario ofquark-hadron-induced inhomogeneities is all the Be and B observations, to date, are best explained by also discussed. It is shown that when this alternative scenario galactic cosmic ray spallation (2) in Pop II environments and is made to fit the observed abundances accurately, the resulting not by any cosmological process. conclusions on the baryonic density relative to the critical This report will draw on two recent reviews (3 and 4) and density (fQb) remain approximately the same as in the standard in some ways is an update (20 years later) ofthe light element homogeneous case, thus adding to the robustness of the stan- summary of ref. 5. dard model and the conclusion that fQb 0.06. This latter point is the driving force behind the need for nonbaryonic dark History of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) matter (assuming total density fitt = 1) and the need for dark baryonic matter, since the density of visible matter 1iksib1e < It should be noted that there is a symbiotic connection fQb. The recent Population II B and Be observations are also between primordial nucleosynthesis (hereafter referred to as discussed and shown to be a consequence of cosmic ray BBN) and the 3 K background dating back to Gamow and his spallation processes rather than primordial nucleosynthesis. associates Alpher and Herman. The initial BBN calculations The light elements and N,, successfully probe the cosmological of Gamow's group (6) assumed pure neutrons as an initial model at times as early as 1 sec and a temperature (1) of -1010 condition and thus were not particularly accurate, but their K (-1 MeV). Thus, they provided the first quantitative inaccuracies had little effect on the group's predictions for a arguments that led to the connections of cosmology to nuclear background radiation. and particle physics. Once Hayashi (7) recognized the role of neutron-proton equilibration, the framework for BBN calculations them- selves has not varied significantly. The work of Alpher et al. Yacov Zeldovich (1) noted in material written just before he (8) and Hoyle and Taylor (9), preceding the discovery of the died in 1987 that "the greatest success ofthe Big Bang theory 3 K background, and Peebles (10) and Wagoner et al. (11), is the fact that the quantitative observation of the light immediately following the discovery, and the more recent element abundances agrees with the prediction of the theory work of our group of collaborators (12-18) all do essentially of nucleosynthesis." Such praise from Zeldovich is indeed the same basic calculation, the results of which are shown in pleasing, for the field and, hopefully, the recent develop- Fig. 1. As far as the calculation itself goes, solving the ments that will be described in this paper would not have reaction network is relatively simple by using the numerical detracted from Zeldovich's views. procedures developed slightly earlier for explosive nucleo- This paper will review the present status of primordial synthesis calculations in supernovae (and nuclear weapons nucleosynthesis. After briefly reviewing the history, this tests), with the calculational changes over the last 25 years paper will make special emphasis of the remarkable agree- being mainly in terms of more recent nuclear reaction rates ment of the observed light element abundances with the as input, not as any great calculational insight [although the calculations upon which Zeldovich based his comments. It current Kawano code (18) is somewhat streamlined relative should be remembered that this agreement is one of the two to the earlier Wagoner code (11)]. With the possible excep- prime tests of the Big Bang itself (the other being the tion of 7Li yields (and possibly Be and B to be discussed microwave background) as the successful framework in later), the reaction rate changes over the past 25 years have which to place the observed Hubble expansion. The agree- not had any major affect. The one key improved input is a ment of abundances and predictions works only if the baryon better neutron lifetime determination (19). density is well below the cosmological critical value. The With the exception of the effects of elementary particle review will also mention the nucleosynthesis prediction ofthe assumptions to which we will return, the real excitement for The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge Abbreviations: BBN, Big Bang nucleosynthesis; HDM, hot dark payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" matter; CDM, cold dark matter; LEP, Large Electron Positron in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Collider; SLC, Stanford Linear Collider; Pop, population. 4782 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 Colloquium Paper: Schramm Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 4783 situation emphasized by Yang et al. (15) that the light element of with 0.01 0.1 1.0 abundances are consistent over 9 orders magnitude -v 1.0 BBN, but only if the cosmological baryon density is con- strained to be around 5% of the critical value. o i- j 4He(mass ' 10 | BBN was the 2 fraction) The other development of the 1970s for explicit calculation of Steigman (33) showing that the number of neutrino generations, NV, had to be small to avoid over- production of 4He. [Earlier independent work (9, 34, 35) had F 1. BH+rHe commented about a dependence on the energy density of exotic particles but had not done explicit calculations probing 3He Nv] This will subsequently be referred to as the Steigman, Schramm, and Gunn (SSG) limit. To put this in perspective, Z 0.1 1. I 0 0 one should remember that the mid-1970s also saw the dis- 1-8 CONCO RDANCE-"1 covery of charm, bottom, and tau, so that it almost seemed as if each new detector produced new particle discoveries, _j 160- and yet, cosmology was arguing against this "conventional" wisdom. Over the years, the SSG limit on NV improved with 4He abundance measurements, neutron lifetime measure- ments, and limits on the lower bound to the baryon density, hovering at NV, : 4 for most of the 1980s and dropping to density (,q) for a homogeneous universe. below 4 (but not excluding 3) just before LEP and SLC turned on (16, 17, 36, 37). The recent verification of this cosmolog- BBN over the last 25 years has not really been in redoing the ical prediction by the LEP and SLC results (79), where N,, = basic calculation. Instead, the true action is focused on 2.99 ± 0.05, is the first verification of a cosmological pre- understanding the evolution of the light element abundances diction by a high-energy collider. Thus, in some sense LEP and using that information to make powerful conclusions. In (and SLC) have checked the Big Bang model at temperatures the 1960s, the main focus was on 4He, which is very insen- of -101" K and times of -1 sec. sitive to the baryon density. The agreement between BBN The power of homogeneous BBN comes from the fact that predictions and observations helped support the basic Big essentially all of the physics input is well determined in the Bang model but gave no significant information, at that time, terrestrial laboratory. The appropriate temperature regimes, with regard to density. In fact, in the mid-1960s, the other 0.1-1 MeV, are well explored in nuclear physics laboratories. light isotopes (which are, in principle, capable of giving Thus, what nuclei do under such conditions is not a matter of density information) were generally assumed to have been guesswork but is precisely known. In fact, it is known for made by spallation processes during the T-Tauri phase of these temperatures far better than it is for the centers of stars stellar evolution (20) and so were not then taken to have like our sun. The center of the sun is only a little over 1 keV, cosmological significance. It was during the 1970s that BBN thus, below the energy where nuclear reaction rates yield fully developed as a tool for probing the universe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Cosmology," Organized by a Committee Chaired by David N
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, p. 4765, June 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper serves as an introduction to the following papers, which were presented at a colloquium entitled "Physical Cosmology," organized by a committee chaired by David N. Schramm, held March 27 and 28, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Physical cosmology DAVID N. SCHRAMM Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 The Colloquium on Physical Cosmology was attended by 180 much notoriety. The recent report by COBE of a small cosmologists and science writers representing a wide range of primordial anisotropy has certainly brought wide recognition scientific disciplines. The purpose of the colloquium was to to the nature of the problems. The interrelationship of address the timely questions that have been raised in recent structure formation scenarios with the established parts of years on the interdisciplinary topic of physical cosmology by the cosmological framework, as well as the plethora of new bringing together experts of the various scientific subfields observations and experiments, has made it timely for a that deal with cosmology. high-level international scientific colloquium on the subject. Cosmology has entered a "golden age" in which there is a The papers presented in this issue give a wonderful mul- tifaceted view of the current state of modem physical cos- close interplay between theory and observation-experimen- mology. Although the actual COBE anisotropy announce- tation. Pioneering early contributions by Hubble are not ment was made after the meeting reported here, the following negated but are amplified by this current, unprecedented high papers were updated to include the new COBE data.
    [Show full text]
  • Near-Field Cosmology with Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
    AA53CH16-Frebel ARI 29 July 2015 12:54 Near-Field Cosmology with Extremely Metal-Poor Stars Anna Frebel1 and John E. Norris2 1Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; email: [email protected] 2Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Mount Stromlo Observatory, Weston, Australian Capital Territory 2611, Australia; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2015. 53:631–88 Keywords The Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics is stellar abundances, stellar evolution, stellar populations, Population II, online at astro.annualreviews.org Galactic halo, metal-poor stars, carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars, dwarf This article’s doi: galaxies, Population III, first stars, galaxy formation, early Universe, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122423 cosmology Copyright c 2015 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved Abstract The oldest, most metal-poor stars in the Galactic halo and satellite dwarf galaxies present an opportunity to explore the chemical and physical condi- tions of the earliest star-forming environments in the Universe. We review Access provided by California Institute of Technology on 01/11/17. For personal use only. the fields of stellar archaeology and dwarf galaxy archaeology by examin- Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2015.53:631-688. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org ing the chemical abundance measurements of various elements in extremely metal-poor stars. Focus on the carbon-rich and carbon-normal halo star populations illustrates how these provide insight into the Population III star progenitors responsible for the first metal enrichment events. We extend the discussion to near-field cosmology, which is concerned with the forma- tion of the first stars and galaxies, and how metal-poor stars can be used to constrain these processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 275 Lecture Notes, Spring 2015 C@Edward L. Wright, 2015
    Astronomy 275 Lecture Notes, Spring 2015 c Edward L. Wright, 2015 Cosmology has long been a fairly speculative field of study, short on data and long on theory. This has inspired some interesting aphorisms: Cosmologist are often in error but never in doubt - Landau. • There are only two and a half facts in cosmology: • 1. The sky is dark at night. 2. The galaxies are receding from each other as expected in a uniform expansion. 3. The contents of the Universe have probably changed as the Universe grows older. Peter Scheuer in 1963 as reported by Malcolm Longair (1993, QJRAS, 34, 157). But since 1992 a large number of facts have been collected and cosmology is becoming an empirical field solidly based on observations. 1. Cosmological Observations 1.1. Recession velocities Modern cosmology has been driven by observations made in the 20th century. While there were many speculations about the nature of the Universe, little progress was made until data were obtained on distant objects. The first of these observations was the discovery of the expansion of the Universe. In the paper “THE LARGE RADIAL VELOCITY OF NGC 7619” by Milton L. Humason (1929) we read that “About a year ago Mr. Hubble suggested that a selected list of fainter and more distant extra-galactic nebulae, especially those occurring in groups, be observed to determine, if possible, whether the absorption lines in these objects show large displacements toward longer wave-lengths, as might be expected on de Sitter’s theory of curved space-time. During the past year two spectrograms of NGC 7619 were obtained with Cassegrain spectrograph VI attached to the 100-inch telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Cosmology Physics 6010, Fall 2017 Lam Hui
    Physical Cosmology Physics 6010, Fall 2017 Lam Hui My coordinates. Pupin 902. Phone: 854-7241. Email: [email protected]. URL: http://www.astro.columbia.edu/∼lhui. Teaching assistant. Xinyu Li. Email: [email protected] Office hours. Wednesday 2:30 { 3:30 pm, or by appointment. Class Meeting Time/Place. Wednesday, Friday 1 - 2:30 pm (Rabi Room), Mon- day 1 - 2 pm for the first 4 weeks (TBC). Prerequisites. No permission is required if you are an Astronomy or Physics graduate student { however, it will be assumed you have a background in sta- tistical mechanics, quantum mechanics and electromagnetism at the undergrad- uate level. Knowledge of general relativity is not required. If you are an undergraduate student, you must obtain explicit permission from me. Requirements. Problem sets. The last problem set will serve as a take-home final. Topics covered. Basics of hot big bang standard model. Newtonian cosmology. Geometry and general relativity. Thermal history of the universe. Primordial nucleosynthesis. Recombination. Microwave background. Dark matter and dark energy. Spatial statistics. Inflation and structure formation. Perturba- tion theory. Large scale structure. Non-linear clustering. Galaxy formation. Intergalactic medium. Gravitational lensing. Texts. The main text is Modern Cosmology, by Scott Dodelson, Academic Press, available at Book Culture on W. 112th Street. The website is http://www.bookculture.com. Other recommended references include: • Cosmology, S. Weinberg, Oxford University Press. • http://pancake.uchicago.edu/∼carroll/notes/grtiny.ps or http://pancake.uchicago.edu/∼carroll/notes/grtinypdf.pdf is a nice quick introduction to general relativity by Sean Carroll. • A First Course in General Relativity, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy (ASTR) 1
    Astronomy (ASTR) 1 ASTR 5073. Cosmology. 3 Hours. Astronomy (ASTR) An introduction to modern physical cosmology covering the origin, evolution, and structure of the Universe, based on the Theory of Relativity. (Typically offered: Courses Spring Odd Years) ASTR 2001L. Survey of the Universe Laboratory (ACTS Equivalency = PHSC ASTR 5083. Data Analysis and Computing in Astronomy. 3 Hours. 1204 Lab). 1 Hour. Study of the statistical analysis of large data sets that are prevalent in the Daytime and nighttime observing with telescopes and indoor exercises on selected physical sciences with an emphasis on astronomical data and problems. Includes topics. Pre- or Corequisite: ASTR 2003. (Typically offered: Fall, Spring and Summer) computational lab 1 hour per week. Corequisite: Lab component. (Typically offered: Fall Even Years) ASTR 2001M. Honors Survey of the Universe Laboratory. 1 Hour. An introduction to the content and fundamental properties of the cosmos. Topics ASTR 5523. Theory of Relativity. 3 Hours. include planets and other objects of the solar system, the sun, normal stars and Conceptual and mathematical structure of the special and general theories of interstellar medium, birth and death of stars, neutron stars, and black holes. Pre- or relativity with selected applications. Critical analysis of Newtonian mechanics; Corequisite: ASTR 2003 or ASTR 2003H. (Typically offered: Fall) relativistic mechanics and electrodynamics; tensor analysis; continuous media; and This course is equivalent to ASTR 2001L. gravitational theory. (Typically offered: Fall Even Years) ASTR 2003. Survey of the Universe (ACTS Equivalency = PHSC 1204 Lecture). 3 Hours. An introduction to the content and fundamental properties of the cosmos. Topics include planets and other objects of the solar system, the Sun, normal stars and interstellar medium, birth and death of stars, neutron stars, pulsars, black holes, the Galaxy, clusters of galaxies, and cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Li Abundances in the Protogalaxy and Globular Clusters
    Draft version April 18, 2019 Typeset using LATEX preprint style in AASTeX62 Initial Li Abundances in the Protogalaxy and Globular Clusters Based upon the Chemical Separation and Hierarchical Structure Formation Motohiko Kusakabe1 and Masahiro Kawasaki2,3 1School of Physics, and International Research Center for Big-Bang Cosmology and Element Genesis, Beihang University, 37, Xueyuan Road, Haidian-qu, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China 2Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan 3Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, the University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan (Received xxx, 2018; Revised xxx, 2018; Accepted xxx, 2018) ABSTRACT The chemical separation of Li+ ions induced by a magnetic field during the hierarchical structure formation can reduce initial Li abundances in cosmic structures. It is shown that cosmological reionization of neutral Li atoms quickly completes as soon as the first star is formed. Since almost all Li is singly ionized during the main course of structure formation, it can efficiently separate from gravitationally collapsing neutral gas. The separation is more efficient in smaller structures which formed earlier. In the framework of the hierarchical structure formation, extremely metal-poor stars can have smaller Li abundances because of their earlier formations. It is found that the chemical separation by a magnetic field thus provides a reason that Li abundances in extremely metal-poor stars are lower than the Spite plateau and have a large dispersion as well as an explanation of the Spite plateau itself. In addition, the chemical separation scenario can explain Li abundances in NGC 6397 which are higher than the Spite plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metal-Poor End of the Spite Plateau I
    A&A 522, A26 (2010) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913282 & c ESO 2010 Astrophysics The metal-poor end of the Spite plateau I. Stellar parameters, metallicities, and lithium abundances,, L. Sbordone1,2,3,P.Bonifacio1,2,4,E.Caffau2, H.-G. Ludwig1,2,5,N.T.Behara1,2,6, J. I. González Hernández1,2,7, M. Steffen8,R.Cayrel2,B.Freytag9, C. Van’t Veer2,P.Molaro4,B.Plez10, T. Sivarani11, M. Spite2, F. Spite2,T.C.Beers12, N. Christlieb5,P.François2, and V. Hill2,13 1 CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team, France 2 GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, Place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France 3 Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85741 Garching, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 4 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, Italy 5 Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Landessternwarte, Königstuhl 12, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 6 Institut d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 226, boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium 7 Dpto. de Astrofísica y Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain 8 Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany 9 Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon, UMR 5574: Université de Lyon, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 allée d’Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France 10 Université Montpellier 2, CNRS, GRAAL, 34095 Montpellier, France 11 Indian Institute of Astrophysiscs, II Block, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 034, India 12 Dept. if Physics & Astronomy, and JINA: Joint Insrtitute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big-Bang Theory: Construction, Evolution and Status
    L’Univers,S´eminairePoincar´eXX(2015)1–69 S´eminaire Poincar´e The Big-Bang Theory: Construction, Evolution and Status Jean-Philippe Uzan Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris UMR 7095 du CNRS, 98 bis, bd Arago 75014 Paris. Abstract. Over the past century, rooted in the theory of general relativity, cos- mology has developed a very successful physical model of the universe: the big-bang model. Its construction followed di↵erent stages to incorporate nuclear processes, the understanding of the matter present in the universe, a description of the early universe and of the large scale structure. This model has been con- fronted to a variety of observations that allow one to reconstruct its expansion history, its thermal history and the structuration of matter. Hence, what we re- fer to as the big-bang model today is radically di↵erent from what one may have had in mind a century ago. This construction changed our vision of the universe, both on observable scales and for the universe as a whole. It o↵ers in particular physical models for the origins of the atomic nuclei, of matter and of the large scale structure. This text summarizes the main steps of the construction of the model, linking its main predictions to the observations that back them up. It also discusses its weaknesses, the open questions and problems, among which the need for a dark sector including dark matter and dark energy. 1 Introduction 1.1 From General Relativity to cosmology A cosmological model is a mathematical representation of our universe that is based on the laws of nature that have been validated locally in our Solar system and on their extrapolations (see Refs.
    [Show full text]
  • 19. Big-Bang Cosmology 1 19
    19. Big-Bang cosmology 1 19. BIG-BANG COSMOLOGY Revised September 2009 by K.A. Olive (University of Minnesota) and J.A. Peacock (University of Edinburgh). 19.1. Introduction to Standard Big-Bang Model The observed expansion of the Universe [1,2,3] is a natural (almost inevitable) result of any homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model based on general relativity. However, by itself, the Hubble expansion does not provide sufficient evidence for what we generally refer to as the Big-Bang model of cosmology. While general relativity is in principle capable of describing the cosmology of any given distribution of matter, it is extremely fortunate that our Universe appears to be homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. Together, homogeneity and isotropy allow us to extend the Copernican Principle to the Cosmological Principle, stating that all spatial positions in the Universe are essentially equivalent. The formulation of the Big-Bang model began in the 1940s with the work of George Gamow and his collaborators, Alpher and Herman. In order to account for the possibility that the abundances of the elements had a cosmological origin, they proposed that the early Universe which was once very hot and dense (enough so as to allow for the nucleosynthetic processing of hydrogen), and has expanded and cooled to its present state [4,5]. In 1948, Alpher and Herman predicted that a direct consequence of this model is the presence of a relic background radiation with a temperature of order a few K [6,7]. Of course this radiation was observed 16 years later as the microwave background radiation [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 405: Introduction to Cosmology Section A01, Spring 2018
    Astronomy 405: Introduction to cosmology Section A01, Spring 2018 Jon Willis, Elliot 211, Tel. 721-7740, email: [email protected] Website for lecture notes and assignments: http://www.astro.uvic.ca/~jwillis/Jon %20Willis%20Teaching.html Lectures: Location Elliot 161, Monday and Thursday 10.00 – 11.20am. Office hours: Tuesday 2.00pm – 3.00pm. Course text: Introduction to cosmology by Barbara Ryden. See over for additional reading. Course outline: Topic Description Textbook 1 A mathematical model of the universe Chapters 3 to 6 inclusive 2 Measuring the universe Chapter 7 3 The cosmic microwave background Chapter 9 4 Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Chapter 10 5 Dark Matter in the universe Chapter 8 6 Large-scale structure Chapter 12 7 Lambda Chapters 4 and 6 Course assessment: Assignments: 15% Mid-term exams: 15+15% Final exam: 55% Approximately eight assignments will be issued through the semester. Assignments will typically be due one week after the issue date. Late assignments will be accepted up to 24 hours after the due date (with a 25% grade penalty) at which point solutions will be posted on the web and no more assignments will be accepted. The first mid-term exam will take place in class at 1pm on Thursday February 8th. The second mid-term will be scheduled later. Use of calculators: On all examinations the only acceptable calculator is the Sharp EL-510R. This calculator can be bought in the Bookstore for about $10. DO NOT bring any other calculator to examinations Astronomy 405: Introduction to cosmology Section A01, Spring 2018 Additional reading: not compulsory, just useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmological Lithium Problems
    EPJ Web of Conferences 184, 01002 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818401002 9th European Summer School on Experimental Nuclear Astrophysics Cosmological Lithium Problems C.A. Bertulani1,�, Shubhchintak1,��, and A.M. Mukhamedzhanov2,��� 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX 75429, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA Abstract. We briefly describe the cosmological lithium problems followed by a summary of our recent theoretical work on the magnitude of the effects of electron screening, the possible existence of dark matter parallel universes and the use of non-extensive (Tsal- lis) statistics during big bang nucleosynthesis. Solutions within nuclear physics are also discussed and recent measurements of cross-sections based on indirect experimental tech- niques are summarized. 1 Introduction The cosmological lithium problem has become one of the most intriguing open questions in cos- mology due to inconsistencies between observation and calculations based on the standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) for the primordial elemental abundances. The BBN model contains a few parameters such as the baryon-to-photon ratio η = nb/nγ, the neutron decay time τn, and the number of neutrino families Nν (see, for instance, Ref. [1]). The parameter η relates to the baryon density of the universe by means of Ω h2 (η/10 10)/273, with the Hubble dimensionless parameter h defined 0 � − through the relation H0 = 100h km/s/Mpc, the index ‘0’ meaning present time. The anisotropies of the cosmic microwave radiation (CMB) independently determine the value of η [2, 3] when the uni- verse was about 0.3 Myr after the Big Bang.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Cosmology Astronomy 6005 / Physics 6010, Fall 2007 Lam
    Physical Cosmology Astronomy 6005 / Physics 6010, Fall 2007 Lam Hui My coordinates. Pupin 1026. Phone: 854-7241. Email: [email protected]. URL: http://www.astro.columbia.edu/∼lhui. Office hours. Wednesday 2 – 3 pm, or by appointment. Class Meeting Time/Place. Monday and Wednesday, 3:00 pm - 4:10 pm. Pupin 412. Prerequisites. No permission is required if you are an Astronomy or Physics graduate student – however, it will be assumed you have a background in statisti- cal mechanics, quantum mechanics and electromagnetism at the undergraduate level. Knowledge of general relativity is not required. If you are an under- graduate student, you must obtain explicit permission from me. In general, permission will not be granted unless you have taken all the advanced undergraduate physics courses, including mechanics, quantum mechanics, sta- tistical mechanics and electromagnetism. Requirements. Problem sets and eprint report (http://arxiv.org). Two of the problem sets will serve as take-home midterm and final exams. Topics covered. Basics of hot big bang standard model. Newtonian cosmology. Geometry and general relativity. Thermal history of the universe. Primordial nucleosynthesis. Recombination. Microwave background. Dark matter and dark energy. Spatial statistics. Inflation and structure formation. Perturba- tion theory. Large scale structure. Non-linear clustering. Galaxy formation. Intergalactic medium. Gravitational lensing. Texts. The main text is Modern Cosmology, by Scott Dodelson, Academic Press, available at the Labyrinth bookstore on W. 112th Street. The website is http://www.bookculture.com. Other recommended references include: • Volumes 5, 6 and 10 of Landau and Lifshitz. • http://pancake.uchicago.edu/∼carroll/notes/grtiny.ps or http://pancake.uchicago.edu/∼carroll/notes/grtinypdf.pdf is a nice quick introduction to general relativity by Sean Carroll.
    [Show full text]