A Study of Morphophysiological Descriptors of Cultivated Anthurium
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hamamelis.Pdf
Amer. J. Bot. 77(1): 77-91. 1990. COMPARATIVE ONTOGENY OF THE INFLORESCENCE AND FLOWER OF HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA AND LOROPETALUM CHINENSE (HAMAMELIDACEAE)' Department of Plant Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824 A B S T R A C T A comparative developmental study of the inflorescence and flower of Hamamelis L. (4- merous) and Loropetalum (R. Br.) Oliv. (4-5 merous) was conducted to determine how de- velopment differs in these genera and between these genera and others of the family. Emphasis was placed on determining the types of floral appendages from which the similarly positioned nectaries of Hamamel~sand sterile phyllomes of Loropetalum have evolved. In Hamamelis virginiana L. and H. mollis Oliv. initiation of whorls of floral appendages occurred centripetally. Nectary primordia arose adaxial to the petals soon after the initiation of stamen primordia and before initiation of carpel primordia. In Loropetalum chinense (R. Br.) Oliv. floral appendages did not arise centripetally. Petals and stamens first arose on the adaxial portion, and then on the abaxial portion of the floral apex. The sterile floral appendages (sterile phyllomes of uncertain homology) were initiated adaxial to the petals after all other whorls of floral appendages had become well developed. In all three species, two crescent shaped carpel primordia arose opposite each other and became closely appressed at their margins. Postgenital fusion followed and a falsely bilocular, bicarpellate ovary was formed. Ovule position and development are described. The nectaries ofHamamelisand sterile phyllomes of Loropetalum rarely develop as staminodia, suggesting a staminodial origin. However, these whorls arise at markedly different times and are therefore probably not derived from the same whorl of organs in a common progenitor. -
Plant Terminology
PLANT TERMINOLOGY Plant terminology for the identification of plants is a necessary evil in order to be more exact, to cut down on lengthy descriptions, and of course to use the more professional texts. I have tried to keep the terminology in the database fairly simple but there is no choice in using many descriptive terms. The following slides deal with the most commonly used terms (more specialized terms are given in family descriptions where needed). Professional texts vary from fairly friendly to down-right difficult in their use of terminology. Do not be dismayed if a plant or plant part does not seem to fit any given term, or that some terms seem to be vague or have more than one definition – that’s life. In addition this subject has deep historical roots and plant terminology has evolved with the science although some authors have not. There are many texts that define and illustrate plant terminology – I use Plant Identification Terminology, An illustrated Glossary by Harris and Harris (see CREDITS) and others. Most plant books have at least some terms defined. To really begin to appreciate the diversity of plants, a good text on plant systematics or Classification is a necessity. PLANT TERMS - Typical Plant - Introduction [V. Max Brown] Plant Shoot System of Plant – stem, leaves and flowers. This is the photosynthetic part of the plant using CO2 (from the air) and light to produce food which is used by the plant and stored in the Root System. The shoot system is also the reproductive part of the plant forming flowers (highly modified leaves); however some plants also have forms of asexual reproduction The stem is composed of Nodes (points of origin for leaves and branches) and Internodes Root System of Plant – supports the plant, stores food and uptakes water and minerals used in the shoot System PLANT TERMS - Typical Perfect Flower [V. -
Auxin Regulation Involved in Gynoecium Morphogenesis of Papaya Flowers
Zhou et al. Horticulture Research (2019) 6:119 Horticulture Research https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0205-8 www.nature.com/hortres ARTICLE Open Access Auxin regulation involved in gynoecium morphogenesis of papaya flowers Ping Zhou 1,2,MahparaFatima3,XinyiMa1,JuanLiu1 and Ray Ming 1,4 Abstract The morphogenesis of gynoecium is crucial for propagation and productivity of fruit crops. For trioecious papaya (Carica papaya), highly differentiated morphology of gynoecium in flowers of different sex types is controlled by gene networks and influenced by environmental factors, but the regulatory mechanism in gynoecium morphogenesis is unclear. Gynodioecious and dioecious papaya varieties were used for analysis of differentially expressed genes followed by experiments using auxin and an auxin transporter inhibitor. We first compared differential gene expression in functional and rudimentary gynoecium at early stage of their development and detected significant difference in phytohormone modulating and transduction processes, particularly auxin. Enhanced auxin signal transduction in rudimentary gynoecium was observed. To determine the role auxin plays in the papaya gynoecium, auxin transport inhibitor (N-1-Naphthylphthalamic acid, NPA) and synthetic auxin analogs with different concentrations gradient were sprayed to the trunk apex of male and female plants of dioecious papaya. Weakening of auxin transport by 10 mg/L NPA treatment resulted in female fertility restoration in male flowers, while female flowers did not show changes. NPA treatment with higher concentration (30 and 50 mg/L) caused deformed flowers in both male and female plants. We hypothesize that the occurrence of rudimentary gynoecium patterning might associate with auxin homeostasis alteration. Proper auxin concentration and auxin homeostasis might be crucial for functional gynoecium morphogenesis in papaya flowers. -
Understanding the Origin and Rapid Diversification of the Genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae), Integrating Molecular Phylogenetics, Morphology and Fossils
University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 8-3-2011 Understanding the origin and rapid diversification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae), integrating molecular phylogenetics, morphology and fossils Monica Maria Carlsen University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Carlsen, Monica Maria, "Understanding the origin and rapid diversification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae), integrating molecular phylogenetics, morphology and fossils" (2011). Dissertations. 414. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/414 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mónica M. Carlsen M.S., Biology, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 2003 B.S., Biology, Universidad Central de Venezuela – Caracas, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biology with emphasis in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics June 2011 Advisory Committee Peter Stevens, Ph.D. (Advisor) Thomas B. Croat, Ph.D. (Co-advisor) Elizabeth Kellogg, Ph.D. Peter M. Richardson, Ph.D. Simon J. Mayo, Ph.D Copyright, Mónica M. Carlsen, 2011 Understanding the origin and rapid diversification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae), integrating molecular phylogenetics, morphology and fossils Mónica M. Carlsen M.S., Biology, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 2003 B.S., Biology, Universidad Central de Venezuela – Caracas, 1998 Advisory Committee Peter Stevens, Ph.D. -
Anthurium Andraeanum) As a Cut Flower in Bangladesh
Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 103-107, 2013 VARIETAL STUDY OF ANTHURIUM (ANTHURIUM ANDRAEANUM) AS A CUT FLOWER IN BANGLADESH M.S. ISLAM, H. MEHRAJ, M.Z.K. RONI, S. SHAHRIN AND A.F.M. JAMAL UDDIN* Department of Horticulture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh ABSTRACT Five varieties viz., Caesar, Aymara, Ivory, Jewel, and Triticaca were in use for the study in Randomized Complete Block Design with five replications. Significant differences among cultivars were noted for all attributes evaluated. Variety ‘Triticaca’ had maximum stalk length and diameter, spathe length and breadth, spadix length, vase life and flowers per plant. Through present analysis it is noticed that, variety ‘Titicaca’ are exceedingly preferred because of its attractive flowers, excellent flower size, yield potentiality and long shelf life. Key words: Anthurium, Cut flower, Vase life INTRODUCTION Anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum) is a slow-growing perennial flowering plant that requires shady, humid conditions as found in tropical forests. The genus anthurium is evergreen and belongs to the family Araceae as the plant possesses an underground rhizome with adventitious roots, characteristic of the family. Anthurium characteristically produces numerous inflorescences subtended by brightly colored spathes, which are carried on long, slender peduncles. Spathes are characteristically heart-shaped, flat, puckered and shiny and flowers have a wide range of spathe colors viz., white, pink, salmon-pink, red, light-red, dark-red, brown, green, lavender, cream or multi-colored. The colorful spathe is long-lasting. However, the ‘true’ flowers are found on the spadix and have large numbers of pistils, each surrounded by four stamens. -
Peduncle Detection of Sweet Pepper for Autonomous Crop
1 Peduncle Detection of Sweet Pepper for Autonomous Crop Harvesting - Combined Colour and 3D Information Inkyu Sa1∗, Chris Lehnert2, Andrew English2, Chris McCool2, Feras Dayoub2, Ben Upcroft2, Tristan Perez2 Abstract—This paper presents a 3D visual detection method for the challenging task of detecting peduncles of sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum) in the field. Cutting the peduncle cleanly is one of the most difficult stages of the harvesting process, where the peduncle is the part of the crop that attaches it to the main stem of the plant. Accurate peduncle detection in 3D space is therefore a vital step in reliable autonomous harvesting of sweet peppers, as this can lead to precise cutting while avoiding damage to the surrounding plant. This paper makes use of both colour and geometry information acquired from an RGB-D sensor and utilises a supervised-learning approach for the peduncle detection task. The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated and evaluated using qualitative and quantitative results (the Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) of the detection precision-recall curve). We are able to achieve an AUC of 0.71 for peduncle detection on field-grown sweet peppers. We release a set of manually annotated 3D sweet pepper and peduncle images to Fig. 1. Sweet pepper picking in operation showing a robotics arm equipped assist the research community in performing further research on with an end-effector tool to harvest the pepper by cutting its peduncle. The this topic. photo highlights the presence of occlusions and varying lighting conditions of peduncles and sweet peppers grown in a field environment. -
Introduction to Plant Science Flower and Inflorescence Structure Introduction
INTRODUCTION TO PLANT SCIENCE FLOWER AND INFLORESCENCE STRUCTURE INTRODUCTION Seed or fruit production is a major contributor of food for our welfare. There are numerous reasons for this but some of the major factors are the high nutritional value of the seed and fruit we produce as well as the storability of the seed itself. These are products of the process of sexual reproduction. As such, we put an emphasis on the understanding of this process. Plant reproduction is the production of offspring in plants, which can be accomplished by sexual or asexual reproduction. Sexual reproduction produces offspring by the fusion of gametes, resulting in offspring genetically different from the parent or parents. Asexual reproduction produces new individuals without the fusion of gametes, creating genetically identical (clones) to the parent plants except when mutations occur.. This laboratory exercise will cover (a) the diversity of flower types in respect to structure and classification, (b) the differing anatomy associated with the male and female floral structures of both dicot and monocot plants, and (c) the different structural differences with the various types of inflorescences found with economically important species. LEARNING OUTCOMES 1. Understand the process of sexual reproduction of economically important plants and the characteristics related to the process. 2. Be able to correctly use the terminology and identify the structure of the flowers produced by common agronomic and horticultural species. 3. Learn the characteristics and the associated terminology of inflorescences that support the floral structures during the process of sexual reproduction. MATERIALS & METHODS – SEED DIVERSITY 1. Flowering plants of various plant species of both monocots and dicots. -
Characterization of the Antiyeast Compound and Probiotic Properties
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology ISSN: 0717-3458 http://www.ejbiotechnology.info DOI: 10.2225/vol13-issue5-fulltext-2 Optimization in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Anthurium andraeanum using GFP as a reporter Qing Zhao1 · Ji Jing2 · Gang Wang2 · Jie Hua Wang2 · Yuan Yuan Feng2 2 2 Han Wen Xing · Chun Feng Guan 1 School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, PR China 2 School of Agriculture and Bioengineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, PR China Corresponding author: [email protected] - [email protected] Received September 16, 2009 / Accepted May 5, 2010 Published online: September 15, 2010 © 2010 by Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile Abstract Although Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocols for many economically important plant species have been well established, protocol for a number of flowering plants including Anthurium andraeanum remains challenging. In this study, we report success in generating transgenic Anthurium andraeanum cv Arizona using Agrobacterium GV3101 strain harboring a binary vector carrying gfp as a reporter gene. The possibility of facilitating the screening process for transgenic plants expressing functional proteins using gfp marker was explored. In order to realize high transformation efficiency, different explant sources including undifferentiated callus pieces and petioles were compared for their regeneration efficiency and susceptibility to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. We also optimized the concentration of AS added to co-cultivation media. Genomic PCR revealed that 11 of the 22 resistant plantlets regenerated on selective medium were successfully transformed. Green fluorescence was observed using a fluorescence microscope in 7 of the 11 PCR-positive plants, indicating GFP was expressed stably in the transformed Anthurium andraeanum. -
A New Species of Anthurium Sect. Andiphillum (Araceae) from Cultivation
PALMARBOR Croat and Hodel: New Anthurium (Araceae) 2020-8: 1–16 A New Species of Anthurium sect. Andiphillum (Araceae) from Cultivation THOMAS B. CROAT AND DONALD R. HODEL Key Words: Anthurium, Araceae, sect. Andiphillum, new species, Mexico. Introduction The genus Anthurium was last revised for Central America nearly 40 years ago (Croat 1983; 1986) and will soon be revised again for Flora of Mesoamerica (Croat in prep.). The new revision will contain 370 species of Anthurium, up from around 220 species known in 1986. The most recently discovered species has resulted from a fortuitous situation. The junior author had an Anthurium growing in his garden near Los Angeles, California and suspected it might be new to science (Figs. 1–2). He sent photos and material of the plant to the senior author who also suspected it was new to science. The senior author investigated the material and keyed it out in both the Lucid Anthurium Key (an as yet unpublished, on-line electronic key) and the newly composed key to Anthurium for Flora of Mesoamerica (Croat in prep.), which confirmed the authors’ suspicions. This new species, though ostensibly of unknown origin, is little known in cultivation, existing only in a few private, exotic plant collections in Southern California. The species regularly sets fruit, a good sign that it is probably not a hybrid. It certainly must have originated from Mexico or possibly Guatemala, the only two countries where the sect. Andiphillum occurs (except rarely in Honduras). The more or less D-shaped to U-shaped petioles and the very large fruits (berries) readily distinguish this section (Carlsen and Croat 2019; Croat and Hormell 2017). -
Vegetative Vs. Reproductive Morphology
Today’s lecture: plant morphology Vegetative vs. reproductive morphology Vegetative morphology Growth, development, photosynthesis, support Not involved in sexual reproduction Reproductive morphology Sexual reproduction Vegetative morphology: seeds Seed = a dormant young plant in which development is arrested. Cotyledon (seed leaf) = leaf developed at the first node of the embryonic stem; present in the seed prior to germination. Vegetative morphology: roots Water and mineral uptake radicle primary roots stem secondary roots taproot fibrous roots adventitious roots Vegetative morphology: roots Modified roots Symbiosis/parasitism Food storage stem secondary roots Increase nutrient Allow dormancy adventitious roots availability Facilitate vegetative spread Vegetative morphology: stems plumule primary shoot Support, vertical elongation apical bud node internode leaf lateral (axillary) bud lateral shoot stipule Vegetative morphology: stems Vascular tissue = specialized cells transporting water and nutrients Secondary growth = vascular cell division, resulting in increased girth Vegetative morphology: stems Secondary growth = vascular cell division, resulting in increased girth Vegetative morphology: stems Modified stems Asexual (vegetative) reproduction Stolon: above ground Rhizome: below ground Stems elongating laterally, producing adventitious roots and lateral shoots Vegetative morphology: stems Modified stems Food storage Bulb: leaves are storage organs Corm: stem is storage organ Stems not elongating, packed with carbohydrates Vegetative -
Cut Flowers, Cut Foliages, Cut Ornamentals, and Floral Arrangements for Their Corporate, Commercial, and Residential Clients
2017 National Collegiate Landscape Competition Flower and Foliage ID List Brigham Young University—Provo, Utah Reminders for students about scientific names: 1) Genus names are always capitalized. 2) The specific epithet (species name) always starts with a lower-case letter. 3) Cultivar names are always capitalized and enclosed within single quotes. 4) Common names begin with lower-case letters; however, proper nouns are capitalized: i.e. lily of the Nile; Peruvian lily; star of Bethlehem; bells of Ireland 5) The cultivar name is considered a proper name because it is a specific selection of the species or hybrid; it often becomes part of the common name and continues to be capitalized: i.e. Philodendron bipinnatifidum ‘Hope’ = Hope philodendron 6) Technically, there is no space between the hybrid sign “x” and the specific epithet; a space has been used in this list for the sake of clarity: i.e. Chrysanthemum xgrandiflorum = Chrysanthemum x grandiflorum 7) Because numerous species are used and sometimes the exact species is not always known, “spp.” is written following the genus name in lower case letters (as shown on the list). 8) In the case of many hybrids and/or cultivars, the words “Hybrids” or “Hybrid Cultivars,” etc. (as shown) is listed following the genus name. 9) Information in parentheses, synonym scientific names, plant patent numbers, and plant groupings, etc. do not need to be memorized. 10) Although there will be an entire bunch of the same plant material in each vase or bucket, the common name should be listed for one stem: i.e. peony, not peonies; galax leaf, not galax leaves 11) Although genus and species names are generally italicized while cultivar names are not, you will not be required to italicize scientific names. -
Harvard Papers in Botany Volume 22, Number 1 June 2017
Harvard Papers in Botany Volume 22, Number 1 June 2017 A Publication of the Harvard University Herbaria Including The Journal of the Arnold Arboretum Arnold Arboretum Botanical Museum Farlow Herbarium Gray Herbarium Oakes Ames Orchid Herbarium ISSN: 1938-2944 Harvard Papers in Botany Initiated in 1989 Harvard Papers in Botany is a refereed journal that welcomes longer monographic and floristic accounts of plants and fungi, as well as papers concerning economic botany, systematic botany, molecular phylogenetics, the history of botany, and relevant and significant bibliographies, as well as book reviews. Harvard Papers in Botany is open to all who wish to contribute. Instructions for Authors http://huh.harvard.edu/pages/manuscript-preparation Manuscript Submission Manuscripts, including tables and figures, should be submitted via email to [email protected]. The text should be in a major word-processing program in either Microsoft Windows, Apple Macintosh, or a compatible format. Authors should include a submission checklist available at http://huh.harvard.edu/files/herbaria/files/submission-checklist.pdf Availability of Current and Back Issues Harvard Papers in Botany publishes two numbers per year, in June and December. The two numbers of volume 18, 2013 comprised the last issue distributed in printed form. Starting with volume 19, 2014, Harvard Papers in Botany became an electronic serial. It is available by subscription from volume 10, 2005 to the present via BioOne (http://www.bioone. org/). The content of the current issue is freely available at the Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries website (http://huh. harvard.edu/pdf-downloads). The content of back issues is also available from JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/) volume 1, 1989 through volume 12, 2007 with a five-year moving wall.