DOCSLIB.ORG

Based Natural Resource Management in Wodebeyes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Based Natural Resource Management in Wodebeyes Action Oriented Training of Natural Resource Management Case Study of Community- Based Natural Resource Management in Wodebeyesus Village, Debaitilatgin Woreda, Ethiopia Research Report submitted to Larenstein University of Applied Sciences In Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Development, specialization Training in Rural Extension and Transformation (TREAT) BY Habtamu Sahilu Kassa September 2008 Wageningen the Netherlands © Copyright Habtamu Sahilu Kassa, 2008. All rights reserved PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this research project in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a post graduate degree, I agree that the library of the university may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this research project in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purpose may be granted by Larenstein Director of Research. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this research project or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and the University in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my research project. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this research project in whole or part should be addressed to: Director of Research Larenstein University of Professional Education P.O.Box9001 6880GB Velp The Netherlands Fax: 31 26 3615287 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My sincere thanks is to the Amahara National Regional State and the Sida support program, who offered me to study my masters in development program in the Netherlands. I would like to thank also Dr. Adnan Koucher for his encouragement and moral support during the course time and for his supervising the research, offering critical comments an inspiring technical support that made me to be more proactive in my research work. To all my SARDP – PCU and OSC staff for their harmony, moral, technical and material support during the course and the research work. I especially extend my thanks to Dr.Yitbarek Simane and Dr. Nigusse Alemayehu, who were highly engaged in data analysis and provided me the required technical comments; Ato Assefa Workie and Ato Andualem Addis who were also initially assisted me in the data collecting processes. To Debai Tilat Gin district administrator, Ato Aleligne Necho and others SARDP –WPCC members’ assistances were highly recognized that the arrangement they made for data collection was very smooth and economical too. The Woreda (district) Agriculture & Rural Development experts, Ato Solomon Amogne, Ato Mekuriaw Tizazu, Ato Keskis Guanche, Ato Tizazu Abate, Ato Abiyot Abebe , and Ato Awoke Aderaw ( the study area development agent) paid significant contribution on direct participating in interviewing farmers. Ato Getachew Kifle, an expert in SLUF supported me in supplying the necessary documents about the study area. To the respondent farmers in Wodebeyesus Kebele (village) for their willingness and discipline to share their experiences during the interview. iii DEDICATION To my wife w/o Nigist Alem Endalew whose encouragement motivated me to complete this challenging course, and my daughters Rediet and Hanna Habtamu , for their patience, encouragement, and love during my period of study in the Netherlands. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSION TO USE.......................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................iii DEDICATION.................................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................vii BOX ...................................................................................................................................vii LIST OF ANNEXES .........................................................................................................vii LIST OF ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATION .................................................................viii DEFINATION OF SOME AMAHRIC (NATIONAL LANGUAGE) WORDS .............viii ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ix CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. 1 1.1. Introduction...............................................................................................................1 1.2. Background of the Study .......................................................................................... 2 1.3. Research Context ...................................................................................................... 3 1.4. Problem Statement.................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Research Objectives................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Research Questions and sub questions ...................................................................... 4 1.7 Research Methodology .............................................................................................. 4 1.7.1. The Study Area .................................................................................................. 4 1.7.2. The Research Design ......................................................................................... 4 1.7.3. Sampling Procedure........................................................................................... 5 1.7.4 Data Collection Methods and Strategy ............................................................... 5 1.7.5. Data Analysis................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER TWO: LITRATURE REVIEW ...................................................................... 7 2.1 Natural Resources Management ................................................................................ 7 2.2 Training...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Training Need Assessment (TNA)............................................................................. 8 2.4 Participation ...............................................................................................................9 2.5 Adoption .................................................................................................................. 10 2.6 Learning ................................................................................................................... 11 2.6.1 Learning Theories and Model......................................................................... 12 2.7 Conceptual Framework.......................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER THREE: GENERAL BACKGROUND OF DEBAI TILAT GIN WOREDA (DISTRICT)....................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Location and Agro- ecology .................................................................................... 15 3.2 Population ................................................................................................................ 16 3.3 Agriculture ............................................................................................................... 16 3.4 Infrastructure and Social Services ........................................................................... 17 3.5 Economic activity .................................................................................................... 18 CHAPTER FOUR: REASERCH FINDINGS................................................................... 19 4.1 Description of the respondents................................................................................. 19 4.2 Agricultural Production in Wodebeyesus ................................................................ 20 4.3. Training and Need Assessment process.................................................................. 21 4.4 Opportunities that enhance Learning....................................................................... 24 4.4.1 External factors ................................................................................................. 24 4.4.2 Internal factors .................................................................................................. 25 v 4.5 Participation ........................................................................................................... 25 4.6 Adoption .................................................................................................................. 25 4.7 Community Organization for Natural Resource Management ................................ 25 CHAPTER FIVE: ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................... 27 5.1 Detail Description of the Respondents .................................................................... 27 5.2 Training Need Assessment (TNA)..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • (Lupinus Albus L.) Landraces
    AJCS 11(1):55-62 (2017) ISSN:1835-2707 doi: 10.21475/ajcs.2017.11.01.pne226 Genotype by trait biplot analysis to study associations and profiles of Ethiopian white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) landraces Mulugeta Atnaf*, Kassahun Tesfaye, Kifle Dagne and Dagne Wegary Supplementary Table 1: Ethiopian white lupin landraces considered for the study. (a). Ethiopian white lupin landraces considered for the first study EBI EBI Acc no code Zone District Altitude Acc no code Zone District Altitude Acc1 242279 Awi Ankesha 2310 Acc37 238993 BD Sp Bahir dar 1990 Acc2 242280 Awi Ankesha 2185 Acc38 238994 BD Sp Bahir dar 2020 Acc3 242281 Awi Ankesha 2310 Acc39 239011 BD Sp Bahir dar 2090 Acc4 242282 Awi Ankesha 2410 Acc40 239020 BD Sp Bahir dar 1940 Acc5 242266 WG Dembecha 2110 Acc41 239022 BD Sp Bahir dar 1930 Acc6 239044 Awi Banja 2600 Acc42 239023 BD Sp Bahir dar 1930 Acc7 242277 Awi Banja 2560 Acc43 228519 SG Dera Acc8 242278 Awi Banja 2560 Acc44 242311 SG Dera 1860 Acc9 242283 Awi Banja 2160 Acc45 242312 SG Dera 1960 Acc10 242284 Awi Banja 1960 Acc46 242313 SG Dera 1960 Acc11 236619 Awi Banja 2570 Acc47 242314 SG Dera 2160 Acc12 239045 Awi Banja 2600 Acc48 242315 SG Dera 2380 Acc13 242273 Awi Banja 2490 Acc49 242316 SG Dera 2460 Acc14 242274 Awi Banja 2450 Acc50 242268 WG Dembecha 2010 Acc15 242276 Awi Banja 2590 Acc51 239018 WG BD Z 1950 Acc16 105018 Acc52 242319 SG Dera 2510 Acc17 105005 Awi Dangila 1940 Acc53 105002 SG Este 2420 Acc18 228520 Awi Dangila Acc54 226034 SG Este 2560 Acc19 242290 Awi Dangila 2240 Acc55 242321 SG Este 2630 Acc20 242291
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Surveys 1999
    NUTRITION SURVEYS 1999 – 2000 Region/Zone woreda Date of Agency Sample size Methodology Nutrition Indicatorsi survey Tigre throughout August SCF-UK 937 30 cluster Mean WHL <80%WFL W/H<-2 Z score W/H <-3 Z score 1999 92.8% 5.5% 7.7 % 1.0% Tigre Feb 2000 WVI W/H <-2 Z score W/H <-3 Z score Eastern May 2000 Feb 2000 May 2000 Feb 2000 May 2000 Asti Wenberta 685 13.1% 10.9% NA 2.6% Saesi Tsaedaemba 1412 22.3% 20.1% 3.7% 4.4% Amhara: May-June SCF-UK + 2900 58 clusters in Mean WFL < 80% WFL N.Wello Bugna 1999 worst drought 88.8% 4% Wadla affected woredas. 89,4% 7% Gidan 87.8% 3% Delanta Dawnt 89.4% 7% Gubalafto 90.0% 7% S. Wello Dessie Zuria 89.8% 7% Tenta 90.5% 3% Legambo 90.8% 5% Ambassel 90.7% 6% Mekdella 91.2% 4% Wag Hamra Dehana 88.2% 4% Oromyia Chefa 92.8% 2% Amhara Aug - Oct SCF-UK + 2500 50 clusters in Mean WFL < 80% WFL 1999 worst drought Aug Sept Oct Aug Sept Oct N.Wello Bugna affected woredas. 91.2% 88.7% 89.7% 6.6% 10.6% 7.0% Wadla 91.1% 90.7% 90.6% 7.3% 5.5% 5.7% Gidan 88.4% 88.2% 88.4% 8.9% 8.2% 9.6% S. Wello Delanta Dawnt 87.5% 87.6% 87.5% 11.0% 8.0% 7.6% Dessie Zuria 91.9% 90.9% 90.1% 4.0% 6.2% 5.2% Tenta 89.2% 89.1% 88.4% 10.0% 8.3% 11.7% Legambo 89.1% 89.7% 89.6% 8.4% 6.0% 6.4% Wag Hamra Dehana 89.7% 89.5% 90.5% 8.3% 8.2% 6.4% Amhara March- May SCF-UK + 2500 50 clusters in Mean WFL < 80% WFL N.Wello 2000 worst drought March 2000 May 2000 March 2000 May 2000 Bugna affected woredas 90.1% 90.6% Wadla 90.5% 91.1% S.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Rural Household's Livelihood Strategies in Machakel Woreda, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Nation Regional State, Ethiopia
    Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) Vol.8, No.10, 2018 Determinants of Rural Household's Livelihood Strategies in Machakel Woreda, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Nation Regional State, Ethiopia Adey Belete Department of Disaster Risk Management & Sustainable Development, Institute of Disaster Risk Management & Food Security Studies, Bahir Dar University, P.O.Box 5501 Abstract Rural farm households face an increasing need of looking for alternative income sources to supplement their small scale agricultural activities. However, livelihood strategy is determined by complex and yet empirically untested factors in Machakel Woreda. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the determinants of livelihood strategies in the study area. The data were obtained from 144 sample household heads that were selected through a combination of multi-stage sampling like purposive and simple random sampling techniques. Data were collected through key informant interview, focus group discussion and interview schedule. Multinomial logistic regression model used to analyze determinants of livelihood strategies. Data analysis revealed that farm alone activities has a leading contribution to the total income of sample households (69.8%) followed by non-farm activities (17.2%) and off- farm activities (13 %.). Crop production was the dominant livelihood in the study area and land fragmentation, decline in productivity, occurrence of disaster risk like crop and livestock disease, hail storm, flash flood etc. and market fluctuation were major threatens of livelihood. Four livelihood strategies namely farm alone, farm plus non-farm, farm plus off-farm and farm plus non-farm plus off-farm were identified. Age, education level, sex of household head, marital status, credit access, farm land size, livestock holding size , agro-ecology, family size, frequency of extension contact, distance from market and total net income were major determinants of livelihood strategies in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information Study Tour Ethiopia 2007
    Landscape Transformation and Sustainable Development in Ethiopia | downloaded: 13.3.2017 Background information for a study tour through Ethiopia, 4-20 September 2006 University of Bern Institute of Geography https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.71076 2007 source: Cover photographs Left: Digging an irrigation channel near Lake Maybar to substitute missing rain in the drought of 1984/1985. Hans Hurni, 1985. Centre: View of the Simen Mountains from the lowlands in the Simen Mountains National Park. Gudrun Schwilch, 1994. Right: Extreme soil degradation in the Andit Tid area, a research site of the Soil Conservation Research Programme (SCRP). Hans Hurni, 1983. Landscape Transformation and Sustainable Development in Ethiopia Background information for a study tour through Ethiopia, 4-20 September 2006 University of Bern Institute of Geography 2007 3 Impressum © 2007 University of Bern, Institute of Geography, Centre for Development and Environment Concept: Hans Hurni Coordination and layout: Brigitte Portner Contributors: Alemayehu Assefa, Amare Bantider, Berhan Asmamew, Manuela Born, Antonia Eisenhut, Veronika Elgart, Elias Fekade, Franziska Grossenbacher, Christine Hauert, Karl Herweg, Hans Hurni, Kaspar Hurni, Daniel Loppacher, Sylvia Lörcher, Eva Ludi, Melese Tesfaye, Andreas Obrecht, Brigitte Portner, Eduardo Ronc, Lorenz Roten, Michael Rüegsegger, Stefan Salzmann, Solomon Hishe, Ivo Strahm, Andres Strebel, Gianreto Stuppani, Tadele Amare, Tewodros Assefa, Stefan Zingg. Citation: Hurni, H., Amare Bantider, Herweg, K., Portner, B. and H. Veit (eds.). 2007. Landscape Transformation ansd Sustainable Development in Ethiopia. Background information for a study tour through Ethiopia, 4-20 September 2006, compiled by the participants. Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Bern, 321 pp. Available from: www.cde.unibe.ch.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210714 Access Snapshot- Tigray Region June 2021 V2
    ETHIOPIA Tigray: Humanitarian Access Snapshot (July 2021) As of 31 July 2021 The conflict in Tigray continues despite the unilateral ceasefire announced by the Ethiopian Federal Government on 28 June, which resulted in the withdrawal of the Ethiopian National Overview of reported incidents July Since Nov July Since Nov Defense Forces (ENDF) and Eritrea’s Defense Forces (ErDF) from Tigray. In July, Tigray forces (TF) engaged in a military offensive in boundary areas of Amhara and Afar ERITREA 13 153 2 14 regions, displacing thousands of people and impacting access into the area. #Incidents impacting Aid workers killed Federal authorities announced the mobilization of armed forces from other regions. The Amhara region the security of aid Tahtay North workers Special Forces (ASF), backed by ENDF, maintain control of Western zone, with reports of a military Adiyabo Setit Humera Western build-up on both sides of the Tekezi river. ErDF are reportedly positioned in border areas of Eritrea and in SUDAN Kafta Humera Indasilassie % of incidents by type some kebeles in North-Western and Eastern zones. Thousands of people have been displaced from town Central Eastern these areas into Shire city, North-Western zone. In line with the Access Monitoring and Western Korarit https://bit.ly/3vcab7e May Reporting Framework: Electricity, telecommunications, and banking services continue to be disconnected throughout Tigray, Gaba Wukro Welkait TIGRAY 2% while commercial cargo and flights into the region remain suspended. This is having a major impact on Tselemti Abi Adi town May Tsebri relief operations. Partners are having to scale down operations and reduce movements due to the lack Dansha town town Mekelle AFAR 4% of fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • British Geological Survey PLANNING
    British Geological Survey TECHNICAL REPORT WC/00/13 Overseas Geology Series PLANNING FOR GROUNDWATER DROUGHT IN AFRICA: TOWARDS A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR ASSESSING WATER SECURITY IN ETHIOPIA Project report on visit to Ethiopia, November-December 1999 British Geological Survey, Wallingford British Geological Survey TECHNICAL REPORT WC/00/13 Overseas Geology Series PLANNING FOR GROUNDWATER DROUGHT IN AFRICA: TOWARDS A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR ASSESSING WATER SECURITY IN ETHIOPIA Project report on visit to Ethiopia, November-December 1999 R C Calow1, A M MacDonald1 and A L Nicol2 1British Geological Survey 2Overseas Development Institute This document is an output from a project funded by the Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the DFID. DFID classification: Subsector: Water and Sanitation Theme: W4 – Raise the well-being of the rural and urban poor through cost-effective improved water supply and sanitation Project Title: Groundwater drought early warning for vulnerable areas Project reference: R7125 Bibliographic reference: Calow, R C, MacDonald, A M and Nicol, A L 2000. Planning for Groundwater Drought in Africa. Towards a Systematic Approach for Assessing Water Security in Ethiopia. Project report on visit to Ethiopia, November – December 1999 BGS Technical Report WC/00/13 Keywords:Ethiopia, groundwater, drought, monitoring Front cover illustration: Looking down onto the River Mille from Abbot Village, Ambassel Woreda. © NERC 2000 Keyworth, Nottingham, British Geological Survey, 2000 Contents Executive Summary iv 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Visit Objectives 1 1.2 Visit Background 1 1.3 Project Aims and Outputs 3 2. THE STUDY AREA: SOUTH WOLLO 4 2.1 Selection Criteria 4 2.2 Physical Background 5 2.3 Socio-economic Background 5 2.4 Institutions 6 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Land Tenure Security of Women in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation Program
    PROTECTING LAND TENURE SECURITY OF WOMEN IN ETHIOPIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE LAND INVESTMENT FOR TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Workwoha Mekonen, Ziade Hailu, John Leckie, and Gladys Savolainen Land Investment for Transformation Programme (LIFT) (DAI Global) This research paper was created with funding and technical support of the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights, an initiative of Resource Equity. The Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights is a community of learning and practice that works to increase the quantity and strengthen the quality of research on interventions to advance women’s land and resource rights. Among other things, the Consortium commissions new research that promotes innovations in practice and addresses gaps in evidence on what works to improve women’s land rights. Learn more about the Research Consortium on Women’s Land Rights by visiting https://consortium.resourceequity.org/ This paper assesses the effectiveness of a specific land tenure intervention to improve the lives of women, by asking new questions of available project data sets. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to investigate threats to women’s land rights and explore the effectiveness of land certification interventions using evidence from the Land Investment for Transformation (LIFT) program in Ethiopia. More specifically, the study aims to provide evidence on the extent that LIFT contributed to women’s tenure security. The research used a mixed method approach that integrated quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative information was analyzed from the profiles of more than seven million parcels to understand how the program had incorporated gender interests into the Second Level Land Certification (SLLC) process.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability and Its Prevalence and Cause in Northwestern Ethiopia
    Disability and its prevalence and cause in northwestern Ethiopia: evidence from Dabat district of Amhara National Regional State: A community based cross-sectional study Solomon Mekonnen Abebe ( [email protected] ) University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Ansha Nega Addis Ababa University Zemichel Gizaw University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Mulugeta Bayisa University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Solomon Fasika University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Molalign Belay University of Gondar College of Social Sciences and Humanities Abel Fekadu University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Mikyas Abera University of Gondar College of Social Sciences and Humanities Research article Keywords: disability, PwDs, DHSS, household survey, northwestern Ethiopia Posted Date: August 4th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-18602/v3 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/16 Abstract Background Disability is not just a factor of an individual’s physical condition; it develops through human interactions and reects the social fabric of communities. Despite the fact that it directly affects 15% of Ethiopians, understanding and policy-relevant studies on disability and the conditions of persons with disabilities are lacking. The Dabat Demographic and Health Surveillance System part of the response to ll this gap. With signicant drawbacks in the Surveillance System, this study aimed at assessing the prevalence, types and major causes of disability in Dabat district. Method A community-based cross-sectional study design was employed and covered 17,000 households residing in 13 Kebeles of Dabat district.
    [Show full text]
  • S P E C I a L R E P O
    S P E C I A L R E P O R T FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION TO ETHIOPIA (Phase 2) Integrating the Crop and Food Supply and the Emergency Food Security Assessments 27 July 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, ROME WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME, ROME - 2 - This report has been prepared by Mario Zappacosta, Jonathan Pound and Prisca Kathuku, under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP Secretariats. It is based on information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned if further information is required. Henri Josserand Mustapha Darboe Deputy Director, GIEWS, FAO Regional Director for Southern, Eastern Fax: 0039-06-5705-4495 and Central Africa, WFP E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 0027-11-5171634 E-mail: : [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web (www.fao.org ) at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Special Alerts/Reports can also be received automatically by E-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an E-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected] , leaving the subject blank, with the following message: subscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L To be deleted from the list, send the message: unsubscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L Please note that it is now possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports/Alerts by region: Africa, Asia, Europe or Latin America (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L, GIEWSAlertsAsia-L, GIEWSAlertsEurope-L and GIEWSAlertsLA-L).
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity Among Households with and Without Podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Food insecurity among households with and without podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia Article (Published Version) Ketema, Kassahun, Tsegay, Girmay, Gedle, Dereje, Davey, Gail and Deribe, Kebede (2018) Food insecurity among households with and without podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia. EC Nutrition, 13 (7). pp. 414-423. ISSN 2453-188X This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/76681/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]