11 PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE PEST STATUS of WEED Nature Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

11 PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE PEST STATUS of WEED Nature Of In: Van Driesche, R., et al., 2002, Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 413 p. 11 PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE B. Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York PEST STATUS OF WEED Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L., (Fig. 1) is a weed of natural areas and its spread across North America has degraded many prime wetlands result- ing in large, monotypic stands that lack native plant species (Thompson et al., 1987; Malecki et al., 1993). Established L. salicaria populations persist for de- cades, are difficult to control using conventional tech- niques (chemical, physical, and mechanical), and con- tinue to spread into adjacent areas (Thompson et al., 1987). Purple loosestrife has been declared a noxious weed in at least 19 states. Nature of Damage Economic damage. With the exception of reduced palatability of hay containing purple loosestrife and Figure 1. Purple loosestrife stand. reduction of water flow in irrigation systems in the (Photo by B. Blossey.) West, purple loosestrife does not cause direct eco- nomic losses. Indirect losses accrue due to reductions in waterfowl viewing and hunting opportunities. Ecological damage. The invasion of L. salicaria alters biogeochemical and hydrological processes in wetlands. Areas dominated by purple loosestrife (Fig. 2) show significantly lower porewater pools of phos- phate in the summer compared to areas dominated by Typha latifolia L. (Templer et al., 1998). Purple loosestrife leaves decompose quickly in the fall re- sulting in a nutrient flush, whereas leaves of native species decompose in the spring (Barlocher and Biddiscombe, 1996; Emery and Perry, 1996; Grout Figure 2. Wetland dominated by purple et al., 1997). This change in timing of nutrient release loosestrife. (Photo by B. Blossey.) at a time of little primary production results in sig- Specialized marsh birds such as the Virginia rail nificant alterations of wetland function and could (Rallus limicola Vieillot), sora (Porzana carolina L.), jeopardize detritivore consumer communities least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis Gmelin), and Ameri- adapted to decomposition of plant tissues in spring can bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus Rackett), many of (Grout et al., 1997). which are declining in the northeastern United States 149 Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States (Schneider and Pence, 1992), avoid nesting and for- lations in all but the eastern United States (the oldest aging in purple loosestrife (Blossey et al., 2001a). infested area) still expanding, In the Northeast and Black terns (Clidonias niger L.), once a common Midwest, a significant portion of the potentially avail- breeding species at the Montezuma National Wild- able habitat has been invaded. life Refuge in upstate New York, declined and be- came locally extinct by 1987. The local extinction coincided with a population explosion of purple loos- BACKGROUND INFORMATION estrife from few individuals in 1956 to a coverage of ON PEST PLANT more than 19% of the total area (600 ha), represent- ing 40% of the emergent marsh habitat in 1983 (T. Taxonomy Gingrich, pers. comm.). Another wetland specialist, Purple loosestrife is a member of the Lythraceae (the the marsh wren (Cistothorus palustris Wilson), was Loosestrife family), with highly variable growth form conspicuously absent in purple loosestrife-dominated and morphology. Main leaves are 3 to10 cm long and wetlands but used adjacent cattail marshes (Rawinski can be arranged opposite or alternate along the and Malecki, 1984; Whitt et al., 1999). The federally squared stem and are either glabrous or pubescent. endangered bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergi The inflorescence is a spike of clusters of reddish- Schoepff) loses basking and breeding sites to en- purple petals (10 to15 mm in length). Flowers are tri- croachment of purple loosestrife (Malecki et al., morphic with short, medium, and long petals and sta- 1993). mens. Many ornamental varieties have been devel- Purple loosestrife is competitively superior over oped, some through introgression with the native L. native wetland plant species (Gaudet and Keddy, alatum (Ottenbreit and Staniforth, 1994). Until re- 1988; Weiher et al., 1996; Mal et al., 1997). The spe- cently, Lythrum virgatum L. was treated as a sepa- cies is dominating seedbanks, particularly in areas rate species also introduced from Europe but the spe- with established purple loosestrife populations (Well- cies is now considered a synonym of L. salicaria ing and Becker, 1990; 1993).The fact that expanding (Ottenbreit and Staniforth, 1994). Further details can purple loosestrife populations cause local reductions be found in Mal et al., (1992). in native plant species richness has been demonstrated by the temporary return of native species following Biology the suppression of L. salicaria through use of herbi- Purple loosestrife needs temperatures above 20°C and cide (Gabor et al., 1996). However, without the con- moist open soils for successful germination. Seedlings tinued use of herbicides, purple loosestrife re-invades grow rapidly (>1 cm/day) and plants can flower in and re-establishes dominance within a few years their first growing season. Established plants can tol- (Gabor et al., 1996). In areas where the distributions erate very different growing conditions, including of L. salicaria and of the native winged loosestrife, permanent flooding, low water and nutrient levels, Lythrum alatum Pursh., overlap, the taller, more and low pH. Plants can grow in rock crevasses, on conspicuous purple loosestrife reduces pollinator gravel, sand, clay and organic soils. Plants develop a visitation to L. alatum resulting in significantly re- large, laterally branching rootstock with starch as the duced seed set of L. alatum. (Brown, 1999). main form of nutrient storage (Stamm-Katovitch et Extent of losses. Direct losses are difficult to al., 1998). Mature plants can develop rootstocks of quantify due to lack of long-term monitoring pro- heavier than 1 kg and can produce more than 30 an- grams and data. nual shoots reaching a maximum height of more than Geographical Distribution 2 m. Plants are long lived and mature plants may pro- duce more than 2.5 million seeds annually, which re- Lythrum salicaria now occurs in all states of the main viable for many years. Spread to new areas oc- United States, except Florida, Alaska, and Hawaii, curs exclusively by seed, which is transported mainly and in nine Canadian provinces. The abundance of by water but also adheres to boots, waterfowl and L. salicaria varies throughout this range with popu- other wetland fauna. 150 Purple Loosestrife Analysis of Related Native Plants in the Eastern basin (Blossey, 1995b). Additional surveys were con- United States ducted in North America from Maryland to Ne- braska (Hight, 1990). The Lythracea belong to the order Myrtales of which four families (Lythraceae, Thymelaceae, Onagraceae, Natural Enemies Found and Melastomataceae) are native to much of North America. Within the Lythraceae, 12 species (exclud- No native or accidentally introduced herbivores with ing L. salicaria) belonging to the genera Ammannia, the potential for control of L. salicaria were found in Cuphea, Decodon, Lagerstroemia, Lythrum, Rotala, North America (Hight, 1990). More recently, sev- and Didiplis (Peplis) occur in the northeastern Unites eral native pathogens have been evaluated for their States (Gleason and Cronquist, 1991). With the ex- potential as biological control agents (Nyvall, 1995; ception of Didiplis diandra (Nutt.), water purslane, Nyvall and Hu, 1997). Surveys in Europe identified all species of the Lythraceae covered by Gleason and more than 100 different insect species most com- Cronquist (1991) were used in the host specificity monly associated with purple loosestrife (Batra et al., testing (Blossey et al., 1994a, b; Blossey and 1986), but only nine species were evaluated in more Schroeder, 1995). detail (Blossey, 1995b). Host Range Tests and Results HISTORY OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Of the nine potential control agents identified in EFFORTS IN THE EASTERN Europe, six species were tested for their host speci- UNITED STATES ficity, against 48 test plant species in 32 genera (for a complete list of test plants taxonomically associated, Area of Origin of Weed associated wetland plants, and important agricultural plants see Blossey et al., 1994b). This selection was Lythrum salicaria has distribution centers in Europe based on literature reports of their specificity, their and Asia. The European distribution extends from distribution and availability in the field, and initial Great Britain across western Europe into central observations of their impact on purple loosestrife Russia with the 65th parallel as the northern distri- performance. The selected species were the root-min- bution limit (Tutin et al., 1968). Purple loosestrife is ing weevil, Hylobius transversovittatus Goeze; two common throughout central and southern Europe leaf beetles, Galerucella calmariensis L. and and along the coastal fringe of the Mediterranean Galerucella pusilla Duftschmidt; a flower-feeding basin. In Asia, the main islands of Japan are the core weevil, Nanophyes marmoratus Goeze; a seed-feed- of the species native range, with outlying populations ing weevil, Nanophyes brevis Boheman; and a gall extending from the Amur River south across the low- midge, Bayeriola salicariae Gagné. lands of Manchuria and other parts of China to Host specificity
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Suitability for Crapemyrtle Bark Scale (Acanthococcus Lagerstroemiae) Differed Significantly Among Crapemyrtle Species
    insects Article Host Suitability for Crapemyrtle Bark Scale (Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae) Differed Significantly among Crapemyrtle Species Bin Wu 1, Runshi Xie 1, Gary W. Knox 2 , Hongmin Qin 3,* and Mengmeng Gu 4,* 1 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; [email protected] (B.W.); [email protected] (R.X.) 2 Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida/IFAS North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL 32351, USA; gwknox@ufl.edu 3 Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 4 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, College Station, TX 77843, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.Q.); [email protected] (M.G.); Tel.: +1-979-458-0512 (H.Q.); +1-979-845-8567 (M.G.) Simple Summary: An exotic insect, crapemyrtle bark scale (CMBS, Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae), has spread across 14 states of the U.S. The infestation of CMBS has negatively impacted the growth, flowering, and even fruiting of some Lythraceae plants to various extent, including cultivars of Lagerstroemia indica, L. fauriei, and Punica granatum. This raises concerns that CMBS would threaten other crapemyrtle species and native Lythraceae plants. Understanding the host range and the host suitability for CMBS would help evaluate the potential risks to landscapes and other ecosystems. Information on the host suitability provides beneficial information for breeding resistant cultivars. In this study, we conducted a host range test on six Lagerstroemia species (L. caudata, L. fauriei ‘Kiowa’, L. indica ‘Dynamite’, L. limii, L. speciosa, and L. subcostata) and a native Lythraceae plant in California (California loosestrife, Lythrum californicum) over 25 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Purple Loosestrife
    11 PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE B. Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York PEST STATUS OF WEED Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L., (Fig. 1) is a weed of natural areas and its spread across North America has degraded many prime wetlands result- ing in large, monotypic stands that lack native plant species (Thompson et al., 1987; Malecki et al., 1993). Established L. salicaria populations persist for de- cades, are difficult to control using conventional tech- niques (chemical, physical, and mechanical), and con- tinue to spread into adjacent areas (Thompson et al., 1987). Purple loosestrife has been declared a noxious weed in at least 19 states. Nature of Damage Economic damage. With the exception of reduced palatability of hay containing purple loosestrife and Figure 1. Purple loosestrife stand. reduction of water flow in irrigation systems in the (Photo by B. Blossey.) West, purple loosestrife does not cause direct eco- nomic losses. Indirect losses accrue due to reductions in waterfowl viewing and hunting opportunities. Ecological damage. The invasion of L. salicaria alters biogeochemical and hydrological processes in wetlands. Areas dominated by purple loosestrife (Fig. 2) show significantly lower porewater pools of phos- phate in the summer compared to areas dominated by Typha latifolia L. (Templer et al., 1998). Purple loosestrife leaves decompose quickly in the fall re- sulting in a nutrient flush, whereas leaves of native species decompose in the spring (Barlocher and Biddiscombe, 1996; Emery and
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Globally Rare Coastal Salt Pond Marsh System at Odiorne Point State Park, Rye, New Hampshire
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258108763 A Globally Rare Coastal Salt Pond Marsh System at Odiorne Point State Park, Rye, New Hampshire Article in Rhodora · January 2013 DOI: 10.3119/12-09 CITATION READS 1 116 4 authors, including: Gregg E. Moore Nur P. Ritter University of New Hampshire West Chester University 20 PUBLICATIONS 685 CITATIONS 19 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Gordon Natural Area Monitoring View project San Joaquin Valley Land Retirement Development Project View project All content following this page was uploaded by Gregg E. Moore on 31 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. RHODORA, Vol. 115, No. 961, pp. 1–27, 2013 E Copyright 2013 by the New England Botanical Club DOI: 10.3119/12-09; first published online: January 22, 2013. A GLOBALLY RARE COASTAL SALT POND MARSH SYSTEM AT ODIORNE POINT STATE PARK, RYE, NEW HAMPSHIRE WILLIAM F. NICHOLS NH Natural Heritage Bureau, Division of Forests & Lands – DRED, P.O. Box 1856, 172 Pembroke Road, Concord, NH 03302-1856 e-mail: [email protected] GREGG E. MOORE University of New Hampshire, Department of Biological Sciences and Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, 85 Adams Point Road, Durham, NH 03824 NUR P. RITTER 64 Duncan Road, Hancock, NH 03449 CHRIS R. PETER University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, 85 Adams Point Road, Durham, NH 03824 ABSTRACT. Vegetation patterns in the coastal salt pond marsh system at Odiorne Point State Park in Rye, New Hampshire, the state’s only viable example, are described based on recent surveys and historical data.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of the Lythraceae Based on Four Gene Regions and Morphology
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 166(6):995–1017. 2005. Ó 2005 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2005/16606-0011$15.00 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE LYTHRACEAE BASED ON FOUR GENE REGIONS AND MORPHOLOGY Shirley A. Graham,1,* Jocelyn Hall,y Kenneth Sytsma,y and Su-hua Shiz *Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A.; yDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1579, U.S.A.; and zState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China The family limits of the Lythraceae and relationships among the ca. 31 genera remain poorly known in spite of previous phylogenetic studies. We use morphology and DNA sequences from the rbcL gene, the trnL-F re- gion, and psaA-ycf3 intergenic spacer of the chloroplast and the internal transcribed spacer region of the nu- cleus to explore relationships for up to 27 genera of the Lythraceae sensu stricto and the monogeneric families Duabangaceae, Punicaceae, Sonneratiaceae, and Trapaceae. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian likelihood approaches are employed. Morphology alone provided little phylogenetic resolution. Results from individual gene regions were relatively well resolved and largely congruent, whereas basal rela- tionships were poorly supported. A combined gene analysis of 20 genera produced one fully resolved max- imum parsimony tree that corresponded closely to the maximum likelihood and Bayesian trees in which a monophyletic Lythraceae includes Duabanga, Punica, Sonneratia, and Trapa as derived genera within the family. Decodon is sister to the rest of the family in the maximum parsimony and Bayesian trees, followed by Lythrum and Peplis at the node above and then by the rest of the family, which diverges into two superclades.
    [Show full text]
  • EUDICOTS (Excluding Trees)
    NOTE - THIS IS A DYNAMIC WORKING LIST 45 467 46 40 165 209 366 Bold #s = published blooming period Contributor initials: KK = Ken Kelman, DN = Dylan Neubauer, VC = Vince Cheap, CB = Chuck Baughman, KM = Ken Moore, AK = Al Keuter AND NOT COMPLETE - Data are constantly Bold common name is used for AK photo filenames. 9.6% 9.9% 35.3% 44.8% 78.4% being updated. dk. grn. = QH confirmed; lt. grn. = QH inferred (inflorescence size for Asteraceae (exc. Madia), corolla size for Fabaceae and disk flower coro Location in Park Family common Older scientific name(s) / Plant Common name (all from KK unless otherwise noted) Color Flower Family name name Synonyms Descriptive notes January February March April May June July August September October November December # Petal ("()"=# of perianth parts, fused; f = s= sepal #) Petal size (mm) Added to Added List Ken's order Index Sandhill Wet areas Non-native Collected /Photo ID Type Group FERNS azolla, fern azolla, Pacific azolla, 1X1988 AK Fern Ferns Azolla filiculoides Pond 123456789101112 Azollaceae Mosquito Fern Pacific mosquitofern giant chain fern, giant chainfern, 2 AK Fern Ferns Woodwardia fimbriata Shaded creek banks 123456789101112 Blechnaceae Deer Fern western chain fern Pteridium aquilinum var. 3 AK Fern Ferns bracken fern Open areas throughout park 123456789101112 Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken pubescens 4 KK AK Fern Ferns Dryopteris arguta coastal wood fern Along creek; backside of Italian trail 123456789101112 Dryopteridaceae Wood Fern 5 KK AK Fern Ferns Polystichum munitum western sword fern Redwood
    [Show full text]
  • Wright's Marsh Thistle, (Cirsium Wrightii), and Mescalero Milkwort (Polygala Rimulicola Var
    Species Status Assessment Report for Cirsium wrightii (Wright’s Marsh Thistle) Version 1.0 Photo courtesy of Robert Sivinski, 2012. October 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Patricia Zenone, Susan Pruitt, Ron Vandervort, and Susan Oetker with assistance from Julie Crawford and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Wright’s Marsh Thistle Listing Recommendation Team (Ted Koch, Susan Jacobsen, Shawn Sartorius, Jodie Smithem, Susan Millsap, and Steve Spangle). We also received assistance from species experts Robert Sivinski (retired) and Daniela Roth of New Mexico State Forestry. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Also, we wish to thank Dr. Robert Sivinski for the use of his photographs in this SSA. With appreciation, in memoriam, to Dr. Patricia Zenone, biologist, ornithologist, and dedicated conservationist. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for Cirsium wrightii (Wright’s Marsh Thistle), Version 1.0. October 2017. Albuquerque, NM. Cirsium wrightii SSA Report ii October 2017 WRIGHT’S MARSH THISTLE SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive status review for Cirsium wrightii (Wright’s marsh thistle (Gray 1853, p. 101)) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and extinction risk. Depending on environmental conditions, C. wrightii can exhibit life history characteristics of a biennial plant (a plant completing development in two years, and producing flowers in its second year) or a weak monocarpic perennial (a plant that lives two or more years, then flowers, sets seed, and dies).
    [Show full text]
  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from Sequences of Four Mitochondrial Genes 1Yin-Long QIU∗ 1Libo LI 1Bin WANG 1,2Jia-Yu XUE 1Tory A
    Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48 (6): 391–425 (2010) doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00097.x Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes 1Yin-Long QIU∗ 1Libo LI 1Bin WANG 1,2Jia-Yu XUE 1Tory A. HENDRY 1Rui-Qi LI 1Joseph W. BROWN 1Ya n g L I U 1Geordan T. HUDSON 3Zhi-Duan CHEN 1(Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA) 2(School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China) 3(Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China) Abstract An angiosperm phylogeny was reconstructed in a maximum likelihood analysis of sequences of four mitochondrial genes, atp1, matR, nad5, and rps3, from 380 species that represent 376 genera and 296 families of seed plants. It is largely congruent with the phylogeny of angiosperms reconstructed from chloroplast genes atpB, matK, and rbcL, and nuclear 18S rDNA. The basalmost lineage consists of Amborella and Nymphaeales (including Hydatellaceae). Austrobaileyales follow this clade and are sister to the mesangiosperms, which include Chloranthaceae, Ceratophyllum, magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots. With the exception of Chloranthaceae being sister to Ceratophyllum, relationships among these five lineages are not well supported. In eudicots, Ranunculales, Sabiales, Proteales, Trochodendrales, Buxales, Gunnerales, Saxifragales, Vitales, Berberidopsidales, and Dilleniales form a basal grade of lines that diverged before the diversification of rosids and asterids. Within rosids, the COM (Celastrales–Oxalidales–Malpighiales) clade is sister to malvids (or rosid II), instead of to the nitrogen-fixing clade as found in all previous large-scale molecular analyses of angiosperms. Santalales and Caryophyllales are members of an expanded asterid clade.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vascular Plant Inventory of the Spur Cross Ranch Conservation Area, Maricopa County, Arizona
    A VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY OF THE SPUR CROSS RANCH CONSERVATION AREA, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA Sarah Hunkins and Kevin Smith Spur Cross Ranch Conservation Area 37622 N. Cave Creek Road Cave Creek, AZ 85331 ABSTRACT A vascular plant inventory of the Spur Cross Ranch Conservation Area was conducted from August 2007 through May 2012. The study site, encompassing 2,154 acres (871 hectares), lies close to the northern edge of the Sonoran Desert, in central Arizona. The elevation ranges from Cave Creek at 2,179 feet (664 meters) to the summit of Elephant Mountain at 3,926 feet (1,197 meters). Sonoran Desertscrub is the dominant vegetation type. An annotated checklist, based on collected plant specimens, comprised 396 taxa, including 390 species, 4 additional infraspecific taxa and 2 interspecific hybrids in 73 plant families. Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Boraginaceae and Brassicaceae accounted for 44% of the species included in the inventory. Non-native taxa accounted for 15% of the flora. One rare species of concern, one new state record, and seven species endemic to Arizona are reported. This inventory documents the current floristic diversity of a regionally significant Conservation Area and provides baseline data for future studies of shifts in diversity and use in land management. INTRODUCTION The Spur Cross Ranch Conservation Area (SCRCA) is situated close to the northern edge of the Sonoran Desert, in central Arizona, on the northeastern margin of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is part of a complex of 10 regional parks that rings the city of Phoenix, managed by the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinnacles Vascular Plant List
    Pinnacles Vascular Plant List nomenclature follows Baldwin et al, 2012 Pinnacles Vascular Plant List Lycophytes SELAGINELLACEAE Selaginella bigelovii Spike Moss Native Ferns AZOLLACEAE Azolla filiculoides Mosquito Fern Native BLECHNACEAE Woodwardia fimbriata Western Chain Fern Native DENNSTAEDTIACEAE Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken Fern Native DRYOPTERIDACEAE Dryopteris arguta Coastal Wood Fern Native Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Sword Fern Native EQUISETACEAE Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant Horsetail Native POLYPODIACEAE Polypodium californicum California Polypody Native Polypodium calirhiza Licorice Fern Native PTERIDACEAE Adiantum jordanii California Maidenhair Fern Native Aspidotis californica California Lace Fern Native Cheilanthes covillei Coville's Lipfern Native Cheilanthes intertexta Coast Lip Fern Native Pellaea andromedifolia Coffee Fern Native Pellaea mucronata var. mucronata Bird's-foot Fern Native Pentagramma pallida Silverback Fern Native Pentagramma triangularis ssp. triangularis Goldback Fern Native WOODSIACEAE Cystopteris fragilis Fragile Fern Native Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE Juniperus californica California Juniper Native PINACEAE Pinus sabiniana Gray Pine Native Magnoliids LAURACEAE Umbellularia californica California Bay Native Eudicots ADOXACEAE Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Blue Elderberry Native Page 1 of 18 Pinnacles Vascular Plant List Eudicots AMARANTHACEAE Amaranthus albus Tumbleweed Alien Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate Amaranth Native Amaranthus californicus California Amaranth Native Amaranthus
    [Show full text]