Rietveldt Black Lounge Chair- c 1950 & Red Chair Charles & Ray Eames

Chaise Longue- 1928 Marcel Breuer Corbu, Perriand, Wassily Chair, Jeanneret, 1925

Critical Reading & Writing: Mies van der Rohe & Ottom Posture & the Chair an, 1929 Arch 3711 Lecture 01.2

Cescae Chair-1928 Marcel Breuer Arch 3711

Saaarinen Pedestal/ Tulip Chair

Grand & Petit Confort (Club) Chair, 1928, Le Corbusier, Charlotte Perriand, Pierre Jeanneret Jorge Ferrari-Hardoy , 1938 Overview: Critical Reading & Writing: Posture & the Chair

I Relation to Course Material II Cranz Article A. Content B. Structure of the Article C. Thesis Statement(s) in relation to structur III Reading IV Free-Writing Exercise V Critical Paper #1-A Assignment VI Writing Resources for Students Website VII About Chairs & Design Thinking VIII Chance to sit on chairs

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context

Grand & Petit Confort (Club) Chair, 1928, Le Corbusier, Charlotte Perriand, Pierre Jeanneret Relation of Cranz Reading & Critical Paper to Course Objectives

1. Develop critical thinking skills founded in a cultural approach

2. “Read” places within our culture

3. Understand the role of a professional in support of society’s welfare.

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context

Grand & Petit Confort (Club) Chair, 1928, Le Corbusier, Charlotte Perriand, Pierre Jeanneret Cranz Article - Content

Discussion

Galen Cranz (Kellogg Fellows Leadership Alliance Website

Rietveldt Black Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context & Red Chair Cranz Article - Content

“The flawed nature of Introduction “The Alexander “A brief history of Section chair sitting and Technique” chairs” chair design” Content of section

Purpose of Section

Thesis or summary statements in section

Rietveldt Black Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context & Red Chair Cranz article- Reading: Expert Readers

Expert readers

- Read with a purpose - Use background knowledge to situate text - Establish context before beginning” - Evaluate…and have an opinion..” - Read flexibly, skim and skip when appropriate”

From Leah Christiansen. 2008. “The Paradox of Legal Expertise: A Study of Experts and Novices Reading the Law”, Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal 53,

Saaarinen, Pedestal or Tulip Chair

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Cranz article- Reading: The 80% Read

Cranz is is not an easy reading.

About Critical reading: Don’t expect to get 100%, especially the first time through

For many difficult readings you will understand 80 % of what you read (or 50% or 30%). That is enough for a first read.

Don’t worry about it. Learn to identify the key ideas, and the key arguments and then go back and re-read.

Saaarinen, Pedestal or Tulip Chair

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Cranz article- Annotations

Not a thesis statement, a summary

Thesis

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Cranz article- Annotations

Thesis

Evidence (Posture)

Claim Claim Argument

Proposed Action

Saaarinen, Pedestal or Tulip Chair Claim Cranz article- Annotations

Images Important to Argument

Anectodatal evidence- not convincing

Evidence (posture) Cranz article- Annotations

Evidence (posture & Evidence design) (status)

Claim)

Evidence (design)

Evidence (design & posture)

Saaarinen, Pedestal or Tulip Chair

Evidence Architecture(design) 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Cranz article- Annotations

Thesis re-stated with regard to evidence

Architecture Cranz article- Graph of Overall Structure 5 parts structure & how the paragraphs are distributed

4-part structure & how the paragraphs are distributed 90-91 91-93 93-96 96-98 ½ page 2 pages 2 ½ pages 2 pages

Number of paragraphs in each section

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Cranz article- Identifying Thesis Statements

What are the thesis statements in the Cranz Text?

I invite several of you to write the thesis statements you found in the location where you found them on the blackboard.

Saaarinen, Pedestal or Tulip Chair

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Cranz article- Characterizing Thesis Statements

Discussion of Cranz’s thesis statements

Are they all a thesis statement? Why or why not?

Is there a main one?

Are these statements Debatable Non-obvious Of correct scope?

How does each contribute to the article overall?

Saaarinen, Pedestal or Tulip Chair

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Free-Writing in this Class

Why do we do free-writing in this class?

An opportunity to get started on your critical papers.

A chance to think about topics related to the lectures

Some people learn best from writing their thoughts

Rapson Rapid Rocker Designed by Ralph Rapson, 1945 Locally commissioned and built by Jonathan Leck, 2000 Reissued by redlurered in 2002 Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Free-Writing in this Class

Why do we do free-writing in this class?

An opportunity to get started on your critical papers.

A chance to think about topics related to the lectures

Some people learn best from writing their thoughts

Rapson Rapid Rocker Designed by Ralph Rapson, 1945 Locally commissioned and built by Jonathan Leck, 2000 Reissued by redlurered in 2002 Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Free-Writing Exercise:

Thesis:

Designers should accept/challenge the normative or typical use of the chair when they design

Rapson Rapid Rocker Designed by Ralph Rapson, 1945 Locally commissioned and built by Jonathan Leck, 2000 Reissued by redlurered in 2002 Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A-

Due next Thursday (2 copies please)

You will revise this paper

But remember!

The more you put into the first draft, the better your final draft

(also- This will be your TA’s first impression of you)

Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Process (see suggested writing process in syllabus)

1.Begin with the critical reading Experienced writers begin from annotations 2. Write to think – Experienced Writers generate & test possible ideas by making drafts 3. Shape your argument argument – Experienced Writers shape and (re)organize initial drafts to provide coherence and transitions 4. Avoid Pitfalls- EW Attend to primary tasks, audience, purpose, main idea 5. Edit your Paper- EW write & rewrite (and use spell check) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Process (see suggested writing process in syllabus)

1.Begin with the critical reading Experienced writers begin from annotations 2. Write to think – Experienced Writers generate & test possible ideas by making drafts 3. Shape your argument argument – Experienced Writers shape and (re)organize initial drafts to provide coherence and transitions 4. Avoid Pitfalls- EW Attend to primary tasks, audience, purpose, main idea 5. Edit your Paper- EW write & rewrite (and use spell check) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Process (see suggested writing process in syllabus)

1.Begin with the critical reading Experienced writers begin from annotations 2. Write to think – Experienced Writers generate & test possible ideas by making drafts 3. Shape your argument argument – Experienced Writers shape and (re)organize initial drafts to provide coherence and transitions 4. Avoid Pitfalls- EW Attend to primary tasks, audience, purpose, main idea 5. Edit your Paper- EW write & rewrite (and use spell check) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Process (see suggested writing process in syllabus)

1.Begin with the critical reading Experienced writers begin from annotations 2. Write to think – Experienced Writers generate & test possible ideas by making drafts 3. Shape your argument argument – Experienced Writers shape and (re)organize initial drafts to provide coherence and transitions 4. Avoid Pitfalls- Experienced Writers attend to primary tasks: audience, purpose, main idea 5. Edit your Paper- Experienced Writers write & rewrite (and use spell check) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Process (see suggested writing process in syllabus)

1.Begin with the critical reading Experienced writers begin from annotations 2. Write to think – Experienced Writers generate & test possible ideas by making drafts 3. Shape your argument argument – Experienced Writers shape and (re)organize initial drafts to provide coherence and transitions 4. Avoid Pitfalls- Experienced Writers attend to primary tasks: audience, purpose, main idea 5. Edit your Paper- Experienced Writers write & rewrite (and use spell check) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Process (see suggested writing process in syllabus)

1.Begin with the critical reading Experienced writers begin from annotations 2. Write to think – Experienced Writers generate & test possible ideas by making drafts 3. Shape your argument argument – Experienced Writers shape and (re)organize initial drafts to provide coherence and transitions 4. Avoid Pitfalls- Experienced Writers attend to primary tasks: audience, purpose, main idea 5. Edit your Paper- Experienced Writers write & rewrite (and use spell check) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical papers- Opportunity for Scholarly Writing

Your audience is professional designers & classmates

You will be evaluated on: Use & placement of Thesis Statement Support of thesis with evidence (including citations of sources, especially course reading(s)) Structure of your paper/argument. Edit your Paper- Experienced Writers write & rewrite (and use spell check)

Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical papers- Opportunity for Scholarly Writing

Reference Material:

Assignment Description

Suggested Writing Process (see syllabus hard copy or online)

Nancy Wood Handout For ideas about how to make a strong case

Rubric Edit your Paper- Experienced Writers write & rewrite (and use spell check)

Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context University of Minnesota, Fall 2013 Arch 3711, Julia Williams Robinson/ James Wheeler Department of Architecture Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Critical paper #1-A- Assignment

Critical Paper #1A (2 hard copies due on Thursday, Sept 12)

Please write a paper using the thesis provided below, phrased either positively or negatively. Writers write & rewrite (and Designers should accept/challenge the normative use of the chair when they design use spell check) Underline your thesis statement. Write a clear argument supporting your thesis based upon the evidence provided in the Cranz article. You may also include your own experience to supplement your argument. Provide a clear introduction an argument and a conclusion. For help in framing your argument you may want to refer to the Nancy Wood summary posted on the web. See suggested writing process following these descriptions.

THE ASSIGNMENT A. Assignment is evaluated on 3 aspects: 1. Use and placement of thesis statement 2. Developing the thesis with evidence (citing sources) 2. Structuring your argument Simple statement at beginning Restatement in context of arguments Recapitulation at the end

Part 1 identifying the thesis (in this case identifying the character of the thesis – and thus the type of evidence required) A. Consider these kinds of theses/ claims (Nancy Wood) Claims of fact – Is it correct? Claims of definition- what is its nature, how should it be defined Claims of cause – What caused it, what are the effects? Claim of value – Is it good or bad? How do we know? Claims of Policy – What should we do about it?

Part 2- using your evidence B. Ways to be critical within a body of evidence (see Nancy Wood handout for details) Examination of issues Identifying the point of view of author Questioning the motivation for ideas Challenging authority & bias Considering context of discussion (cultural, historical, disciplinary, etc.)

Remember to relate the way you write to the way you read. Nancy Wood discusses the approach to college level reading as: Discovering the issues and the author’s position (identify your position as author) Identifying the issues, the claim, the reasons, the evidence (what are you claiming? What is your evidence?) Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, How organizational strategies make an argument more convincing (Is your organization clear?) Identifying the argumentative appeal of words (have you chosen good words to represent your Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll ideas?) Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 Refer to 1.SUGGESTED WRITING PROCESS FOR ALL PAPERS (in syllabus harManufacturedd copy & Moodle web sbyite) Knoll 2. NANCY WOOD SUMMARY Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context

University of Minnesota, Fall 2013 Arch 3711, Julia Williams Robinson/ James Wheeler Department of Architecture Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context

Critical Paper Grading Rubric Julia Williams Robinson & James Wheeler, 2013 Critical paper #1-A- Rubric

Forming a topic Far Exceeds Goes Beyond Meets Does Not Meet All Meets Few If Any Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements

Far Exceeds Goes Beyond Meets Does Not Meet All Meets Few If Any DeWritersscription write Re&quire mrewriteents Requirem en(andts Requ ire m en ts Requirements Requirements

use spell check)

Analysis and Interpretation Far Exceeds Goes Beyond Meets Does Not Meet All Meets Few If Any Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements

Conclusion Far Exceeds Goes Beyond Meets Does Not Meet All Meets Few If Any Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements

Mechanics Far Exceeds Goes Beyond Meets Does Not Meet All Meets Few If Any Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements

Comments

Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by,

Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context WRITING RESOURCES Nancy Wood Reference

University of Minnesota, Fall 2013 Arch 3711, Julia Williams Robinson/ James Wheeler University of Minnesota, Fall 2013 Arch 3711, Julia Williams Robinson/ James Wheeler Department of Architecture Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Department of Architecture Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context

Writers write & rewrite (and Nancy V. Wood. College Reading: Purposes & Strategies. Evaluate the Support Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000 Logical reasons and Logical Support (298 -299) use spell check) Types of logical support Critical Reading and Thinking: Reading to Analyze, Ev aluate, Think (260) Facts 1. Understand the Context, Purpose, Point of View Definitions 2. Evaluate the Support, Reasoning, C onclusions Cause-effect 3. Make Inferences and Analyze Values and Beliefs Signs (the existence of one thing indicates at som ething else is true) 4. Use Reading to Help You Think Comparisons Historical- something that happened in the past m ay happen again Shift of focus from study reading to critical reading (261-262) Literal- items in a category are either the sam e or different Shift from exposition to argument Opinions and Personal Credibility (299 -300) Shift from your reading purpose to the author’s reading purpose Emotional Support (301-303) Shift from the language of exposition to the language of argum entation Emotionally loaded language Shift from a single point of view to multiple points of view Emotional examples Shift from writing to learn to writing to think Figurative analogies Shift your reading process Vivid description of an emotional scene Discovering the issues and the author’s position Appeals to needs and values Identifying the issues, the claim , the reasons, the evidence Refutation (taking a position different from your own and showing it is incorrect) (303) How organizational strategies m ake an argument more convincing Identifying the argumentative appeal of words Recognizing Bias (306-307) Author’s attitude) Ways to Predict Controversy and Argument (272-3) Use of emotional support The subject (issues) Alluding to credentials that identify a point of v iew The author (and likely stand) Stacking evidence in favor of a point of view The point of view (in the context of other possible positions) The context for argument (motivation for ideas) Recognizing Misleading Evidence, Faulty Reasoning and Fallacies (308-310 The source (likely bias of the source) Exaggerating or oversimplifying evidence Relying on one’s own authority instead of on evidence Types of Claims (272) Misusing emotional materials Claims of Fact: Did it happen? Is it true? Creating false needs Claims of Definition: What is it? How should we define it? Relying on common fallacies Claims of Cause: What caused it? What are the effects? Hasty generalizations Claims of Value: Is it good or bad? How do we know? Red Herring (evidence used to support a claim that is actually unrelated to it) Claims of Policy: What should we do about it? Faulty cause Straw man ((attributing an argument to an opponent that wasn’t actually m ade) Understanding Context, Purpose & Point of View : 5 Strategies (274-276) Guilt by association 1. Identify the issue and form an issue question Slippery slope (scare tactic, if one thing happens then others will follow) 2. Identify the claim. Determine the type of claim Bandwagon appeal ((everyone is doing it) 3. Speculate about the contex t for the argument Either-or (oversimplifying with 2 unsatisfactory possibilities) 4. Write out your point of view before you read and compare it with the author’s as you read 5. Look for common ground, decide what you think and write your reactions Cross Check Lounge Chair, designed by, Frank Gehry, 1992, manufactured by Knoll Designed by Frank Gehry, 1992 ManufacturedArchitecture by Knoll 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context School of Architecture: College of Design: University of Minnesota http://arch.design.umn.edu/students/wec/

Writing Resources for Students

Forming a Topic WRITING RESOURCES De s cri p ti on Website for Students Analysis & Interpretation Conclusion Citation Styles Book List SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE Student Writing Support Non-Native Speakers of English Writing Types / Genres ABOUT ADMISSIONS NEWS DEGREE PROGRAMS RESEARCH CENTERS FACULTY

STUDENTSters write & rewrite Writing Resources for Students This website exists as a resources for students in the undergraduate architecture program at the Student Work School of Architecture: College of Design: University of MiUnnneivsoterasity of Minnesota. It is a response thto tp:th//ea rWch.deritisnign.umg Enrn.eichdu/edst udeCurntrsicu/weluc/m, which seeks to improve the instruction of writing and graphic communication in the undergraduate program. As a set of shared values Academic Policies established by the architecture faculty, this website serves to aid students by providing a unified set of resources to accomodate different course material and instructors. . Writing Resources for Students Contact Information . Forming a Topic College of Design Description Saint Paul Offices, . Analysis & Interpretation 32 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Ave, St. Paul, MN 55108 P: 612-626-9068 | F: 612-625-1922 Conclusion Hall Workshop [directions and maps] Citation Styles Minneapolis Offices Writing Resources Book List 101 Rapson Hall, 89 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Student Writing Support P: 612-626-9068 | F: 612-625-7525 check) (and Non-Native Speakers of English [directions and maps] Writing Types / Genres Maps & Directions use spell check) Parking & Transportation For Students, Faculty, and Staff

One Stop Designed byMy Frank U Gehry, 1992 © Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and Manufacturedemployer by. Priv aKnollcy Statement Current as of August 6, 2015

Writing Resources for Students This website exists as a resources1 offor 1 students in the undergraduate architecture program at the 8/28/15, 7:08 PM University of Minnesota. It is a response to the Writing Enriched Curriculum, which seeks to improve the instruction of writing and graphic communication in the undergraduate program. As a set of shared values established by the architecture faculty, this website serves to aid students by providing a unified set of resources to accomodate different course material and instructors. Contact Information

College of Design Saint Paul Offices, 32 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Ave, St. Paul, MN 55108 P: 612-626-9068 | F: 612-625-1922 [directions and maps] Minneapolis Offices 101 Rapson Hall, 89 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 P: 612-626-9068 | F: 612-625-7525 [directions and maps]

Maps & Directions Parking & Transportation For Students, Faculty, and Staff

One Stop My U

© Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy Statement Current as of August 6, 2015

1 of 1 8/28/15, 7:08 PM Designer Chairs

So what do designers think about when they design chairs?

How much thought is devoted to the people who will use them?

Below are some chairs made by designers. These are formally interesting, and accept the normative or typical use of the chair.

Later you will get to try out some chairs that are successfully marketed and also accept the normative or typcial use of the chair Diamond Chair,Designed by Harry Bertoia, 1952 Manufactured by Knoll International

Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Designer Chairs

So what do designers think about when they design chairs?

How much thought is devoted to the people who will use them?

Naked Confort Club Chair Designer: John AngeloBenson (UK)2004 Materials: Hay plus Confort chair frame

Grand Confort 1928 Corbu/Jeanneret-Gris/Perriand

ArchitectureSource: Byars 3711:Environmental, Mel. 2008. Newchairs Design: Innovations& the Sociocultural in Design, Context Technology & Materials. San Francisco: Chronicle Book, p 28-9 Designer Chairs

So what do designers think about when they design chairs?

How much thought is devoted to the people who will use them?

Uni Chair

Designer: Tung Chiang (China) 2002

Materials: 15-guage polyvinylchloride (PVC) sheeting, foot-operatedfloor pump ArchitectureSource: Byars 3711:Environmental, Mel. 2008. Newchairs Design: Innovations& the Sociocultural in Design, Context Technology & Materials. San Francisco: Chronicle Book, p 42-3 Designer Chairs

So what do designers think about when they design chairs?

How much thought is devoted to the people who will use them?

Tangram Side Chair

Designer: Nó Design (Flavio Barao Di Samo, Léonardo Massarelli, &Marcio Giannelli (Brazil) 2004

Materials: Oriented strand board (OSB) and screws Saaarinen Tulip

ArchitectureSource: Byars 3711:Environmental, Mel. 2008. Newchairs Design: Innovations& the Sociocultural in Design, Context Technology & Materials. San Francisco: Chronicle Book, p 116-119 Eudora Club Chair Uni Chair Fresh Fat Easy Chair Tangram Side Chair Altra-Ergo Stacking Chair

Contessa Office Armchair Naked Confort Club Chair Designer Chairs

So what do designers think about when they design chairs? How much thought is devoted to the people who will use them? Thank you!

REFERENCES

John Bean. 2001. Engaging Ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Byars, Mel. 2008. Newchairs: Innovations in Design, Technology & Materials. San Francisco: Chronicle Books Kaufman Seats Christiansen, Leah . 2008. “The Paradox of Legal Expertise: A Study of Experts and Novices Reading the Law”, Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal 53,

Fiell, Charlotte & Peter. 2001. Chairs. Koln: Taschel

Wood, Nancy V. 2000. College Reading: Purposes & Strategies. Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Prentice Hall DESIGN APPLICATIONS OF CRANZ’S IDEAS: CRANZ’S PROPOSALS

Galen Cranz’s ideas for: a better airport waiting room and a better office work space

Source: Franck, Karen and Bianca Lipori. , 2000. Architecture Inside Out. Chichester: Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Wiley Academy. FRANK DUFFY, THE WORKPLACE & POSTURE: EXISTING ALTERNATIVE SETTINGS

Ideas about posture play an important role in office design if we consider Frank Duffy’s book The New Office.

In many workplaces, workers use a variety of postures.

Posture affects (and is affected by) activities, expectations, and attitudes.

The Japanese Stock Exchange, EXISTING ALTERNATIVE SETTINGS (Frank Duffy)

Attitudes and expectations are changing about: The right way to work The right way to talk to colleagues

Furniture that supports alternative postures to sitting in chairs is already being used chairs is already being used. Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context EXISTING ALTERNATIVE SETTINGS (Frank Duffy)

Chiat / Day Advertising firm New York City Interior designer: Getano Pesce / Pesce Ltd

Source of images: Duffy, Francis. 1997. The New Office.London: Conran Octapus chairs is already being used. Architecture 3711:Environmental Design & the Sociocultural Context Eudora Club Chair Uni Chair Fresh Fat Easy Chair Tangram Side Chair Altra-Ergo Stacking Chair

Contessa Office Armchair Naked Confort Club Chair

Thank you!

Designer Chairs

Kaufman Seats

Now come look at all the chairs and try out the Balans

(and hand in your free-writing to your TA