K1 – Individual Final Standings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

K1 – Individual Final Standings 2017 TCA South Texas State Scholastic Championships: Kinder-1st -- Standings # Place Name ID Rtng Post Team Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[M] TBrk[M] TBrk[S] TBrk[R] TBrk[C] 1 1 Sunny Zhang 15903555 1067 1111 LFOLMITOW56 W42 W45 D26 W12 W34 W2 6.5 28 22 32 29.75 26 2 2-7 Mason Tsay 16099164 916 1059 MCGONZALW64 W93 W73 W13 W6 W5 L1 6.0 31 24.5 34 27.5 27 3 Samuel Qin 16123997 975 1024 LFRANCHOW28 W20 L13 W74 W22 W12 W15 6.0 29.5 24.5 33 28 23 4 Timothy Qin 16124174 843 959 LFRANCHOW70 W19 W109 L7 W17 W21 W18 6.0 29.5 24 32 27 24 5 Ethan R Mei 16090467 975 1055 ATENGLANW52 W27 W17 W43 W7 L2 W14 6.0 29.5 23.5 33.5 28.5 26 6 Bryan Xu 15725571 986 1047 SAPEGGYW77 W22 W44 W11 L2 W26 W16 6.0 29.5 23.5 33 27 25 7 Abraham Baez 15957311 1002 1039 BRGARDENW60 W50 X--- W4 L5 W43 W11 6.0 29 24.5 29 23 24 8 8-10 Nathaniel Vargas 16111560 701 769 EDBETTSW51 L15 D69 W92 W36 W35 W26 5.5 26.5 21.5 29.5 22.5 19.5 9 Crystal Wang 16153233 640 715 MCGONZALW61 L11 W114 D73 W101 W37 W27 5.5 24.5 19.5 27 20.75 20 10 Karina V Garcia 15920350 643 792 MCGARZAW126 W151 H--- W94 L26 W73 W32 5.5 22 19.5 22 15.5 22 11 11-25 Mateus A Jara 15793811 825 873 BRYTURRIW21 W9 W76 L6 W28 W54 L7 5.0 30.5 24.5 34 22.5 23 12 David Vanegas 16111554 627 924 EDBETTSW47 W54 W18 W15 L1 L3 W48 5.0 30.5 24 34.5 22 23 13 Miguel Lozano 16189171 656 898 BRGARDENW78 W16 W3 L2 W48 L14 W54 5.0 29.5 23.5 33 22.5 22 14 Alison Andrade 16111533 830 844 EDBETTSX--- L17 W47 W65 W19 W13 L5 5.0 29 23.5 29 18 20 15 Anthony Ale Garza 15824925 912 910 BRGARDENW140 W8 W90 L12 W29 W42 L3 5.0 28 22 30 19 23 16 Luigi Ramos 15547658 845 854 IDEAMCW88 L13 W61 W96 W45 W20 L6 5.0 27.5 21.5 30.5 19.5 21 17 Abram Matia Lopez 15939947 651 791 OLS W68 W14 L5 W122 L4 W91 W43 5.0 27.5 21.5 30 18.5 20 18 John Torres 15872628 968 943 BRBENBRIW75 W30 L12 W57 W93 W44 L4 5.0 27 21 30 19 22 19 Uriah C Garza 15489826 675 706 BRHUDSONW38 L4 W58 W109 L14 W51 W52 5.0 27 21 29.5 19.5 19 20 Gabriel Martinez 16104013 740 755 BRGARDENW40 L3 W105 W59 W46 L16 W63 5.0 26.5 20.5 29.5 19.5 20 21 Jesus Maldonado 16181640 484 683 SBPALOMAL11 W84 W79 W150 W33 L4 W44 5.0 26.5 20.5 29.5 17.5 19 22 Riquelme Garduza 16105441 734 759 BRGARDENW91 L6 W97 W51 L3 W96 W53 5.0 25.5 19.5 28.5 17 19 23 Aditty Parajulee 16153248 618 632 MCGONZALL99 W62 L55 W112 W47 W46 W42 5.0 23 19 25.5 19 16 24 Emma Morales 15808230 673 643 BRGARDENL53 L47 W129 W107 W100 W59 W49 5.0 21.5 17.5 24 16.5 15 25 Benjamin Orellana 16097811 939 869 EDNLT L90 W31 L121 W154 W71 W74 W34 5.0 21.5 17 22.5 18 16 26 26-41 Anthony J Ruiz 16105168 847 859 BRGARDENW39 W29 W46 D1 W10 L6 L8 4.5 32.5 26 36.5 21.75 23 27 Kavin Elangovan 16076704 705 696 HUROBERTW104 L5 W82 D36 W55 W64 L9 4.5 27.5 21.5 30 16.75 19 28 Elijah Sepulveda 15621778 550 655 EDCANTERL3 W102 W112 W49 L11 W55 D29 4.5 26.5 20.5 29 16.25 17.5 29 Nelly Danie Gomez 15546037 680 700 BRHUDSONW36 L26 W84 W53 L15 W90 D28 4.5 25.5 20.5 28.5 17.25 18.5 30 Alejandro Garcia 15820682 702 675 EDNLT W65 L18 L49 W113 W61 D40 W66 4.5 25 20 28 17.25 16 31 Marco Anton Tovar 16145961 459 592 LFOLMITOD32 L25 W159 W69 D117 W50 D33 4.5 25 20 25.5 14.5 16.5 32 Eduardo Sastre Jr 15789746 766 714 BRPAREDED31 W53 W150 W101 L34 W75 L10 4.5 24.5 19 27 14.75 20.5 33 Charles Molina 15939754 779 724 BRPAREDEW103 L90 W62 W63 L21 W57 D31 4.5 24 19 26.5 17.25 18.5 Page 1 3/13/2017 1:19 PM 2017 TCA South Texas State Scholastic Championships: Kinder-1st -- Standings # Place Name ID Rtng Post Team Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[M] TBrk[M] TBrk[S] TBrk[R] TBrk[C] 34 26-41 Juan Arteaga 16211766 377 512 SHJENSEND86 W137 W124 W121 W32 L1 L25 4.5 24 17.5 26 13.25 21.5 35 Jorge Garcia 15825013 502 562 BRAACHAML48 W49 W107 D120 W76 L8 W82 4.5 23.5 18 26 15.25 17 36 Careli Samneblia 16116278 428 556 BRAACHAML29 W112 W123 D27 L8 W94 W77 4.5 23.5 18 26 14.25 16 37 Raina Fat-Anthony 15920344 446 554 MCGARZAL50 W72 H--- W124 W121 L9 W81 4.5 21.5 18.5 21.5 12.5 16 38 Adrian J Guerra 16211793 423 452 SHJENSENL19 W95 L92 D87 W123 W76 W75 4.5 21.5 16.5 24 14.25 14 39 Nathan John 16123233 499 505 EDCANTERL26 L46 W148 D95 W124 W84 W73 4.5 21 16.5 23 13 13 40 Emma Liguez 15929804 447 538 MCPEREZL20 W135 W149 X151 L44 D30 W80 4.5 20.5 15.5 20.5 9.75 16 41 Elijah Al Jackson 15822625 448 452 EDCANTERL42 L120 W134 W119 D58 W101 W79 4.5 19.5 15.5 22 14 13.5 42 42-72 Carlos D Moreno 15547114 755 727 BRHUDSONW41 L1 W83 W98 W66 L15 L23 4.0 28.5 22 31.5 15 19 43 Cristian Pirtle 15560203 806 786 BREPISCOW57 W81 W120 L5 W52 L7 L17 4.0 28 22 30.5 14 21 44 Sebastian Garcia 15916395 772 745 LFOLMITOW98 W67 L6 W104 W40 L18 L21 4.0 27 21 29.5 14.5 20 45 Bernardo Ruiz 16153171 680 685 MCGONZALW59 W48 L1 W67 L16 L63 W100 4.0 27 20.5 30 15 18 46 Arman Migue Lopez 15939953 325 533 OLS W123 W39 L26 W60 L20 L23 W103 4.0 25.5 20.5 28 14 18 47 Karina Yu 16004173 397 557 ATINTS L12 W24 L14 W136 L23 W106 W93 4.0 25.5 20.5 27.5 13 13 48 Jose Franc Aldape 16250760 873 811 OLS W35 L45 W78 W103 L13 W98 L12 4.0 25 20 27.5 14 18 49 Ai Markel Ramirez 16224234 324 513 MCRAYBURW136 L35 W30 L28 W103 W60 L24 4.0 25 20 27 13.5 17 50 Sofia Eli Posadas 16132881 705 655 EDCANTERW37 L7 L102 W135 W67 L31 W85 4.0 25 19.5 27 14 15 51 Isabella Barba 15939911 430 461 OLS L8 W107 W144 L22 W108 L19 W117 4.0 24.5 19 26.5 11 15 52 Jordan Munoz 16131296 538 548 PSCARMANL5 W82 W106 W142 L43 W117 L19 4.0 24.5 18.5 26.5 11.5 17 53 Marcil Sandoval 16093618 420 537 BRMARTINW24 L32 X--- L29 W138 W93 L22 4.0 24 20.5 24 10 16 54 Derick Hess 16112296 783 757 PSMCKEEVW96 L12 W99 W91 W90 L11 L13 4.0 24 19 27 12 19 55 Matthew Kuntz 16125450 272 491 LFOLMITOW133 L91 W23 W56 L27 L28 W98 4.0 24 19 26.5 14.5 17 56 Brithany Garza 16105388 612 577 BRGARDENL1 W83 W135 L55 W97 L66 W99 4.0 24 17.5 26 11.5 15 57 Austin Luc Garcia 16131708 481 550 EDCANTERL43 W58 W110 L18 W102 L33 W105 4.0 23.5 18.5 26.5 13 15 58 Itzel Cisneros 16215733 300 416 HRSAMHOUW125 L57 L19 W147 D41 W78 D70 4.0 23.5 18.5 25 12.25 15 59 Gavyn Hernandez 16111512 426 468 EDBETTSL45 W79 W153 L20 W92 L24 W95 4.0 23.5 18.5 25 11 15 60 Justice E Escobar 16099384 580 562 HRBME L7 W105 W113 L46 W62 L49 W102 4.0 23.5 18 26.5 13 15 61 Analise Farias 16149215 404 454 SHWERNECL9 W92 L16 W127 L30 W135 W108 4.0 23.5 18 25.5 10.5 13 62 Andrew Flores 16131343 370 451 PSCARMANW115 L23 L33 W152 L60 W107 W90 4.0 22.5 17.5 24 10.5 14 63 Miguel Vela 16111596 434 509 EDBETTSL93 W71 W136 L33 X150 W45 L20 4.0 22.5 17.5 22.5 10 15 64 Lucia Chavez 15929261 508 499 LFRANCHOL2 D94 W137 W128 W120 L27 D68 4.0 22.5 16.5 24.5 10.5 15.5 65 David Mantle 15929790 434 460 MCPEREZL30 W106 W85 L14 D79 D95 W97 4.0 22 17.5 25 12.75 14.5 66 Hrothgar Bazan 16155575 323 466 LFRANCHOD137 W86 D122 W81 L42 W56 L30 4.0 22 17.5 24 13.25 18 Page 2 3/13/2017 1:19 PM 2017 TCA South Texas State Scholastic Championships: Kinder-1st -- Standings # Place Name ID Rtng Post Team Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Rd 7 Tot TBrk[M] TBrk[M] TBrk[S] TBrk[R] TBrk[C] 67 42-72 Nathan A Macias 15808031 417 492 BRBENBRIW80 L44 W146 L45 L50 W116 W92 4.0 21.5 17.5 23.5 11.5 15 68 Josue Gracia 16137013 409 414 BRAACHAML17 D121 W125 L71 W86 W120 D64 4.0 21.5 16.5 23.5 11.75 13.5 69 Daniel Hir Garcia 16224240 309 393 MCRAYBURW147 L74 D8 L31 D118 W138 W96 4.0 21.5 16 23 11.25 14 70 Nyko Garcia 16112281 497 460 PSMCKEEVL4 L76 W133 W130 D122 W121 D58 4.0 21 15 23 10.75 13 71 Peyton Parker 16145055 253 423 MCGARZAW145 L63 H--- W68 L25 D83 W104 4.0 20.5 17.5 20.5 10.75 15 72 Antwon Estrada 15862842 267 464 PSCARMANW111 L37 W77 L90 W104 L80 W91 4.0 20.5 16 23 12.5 16 73 73-89 Felipe Cantu 16250733 333 476 OLS W144 W140 L2 D9 W80 L10 L39 3.5 21 21 29 10.25 18 74 David Sion Moreno 16156447 484 515 SHWERNECL151 W69 W95 L3 W105 L25 D83 3.5 19.5 19.5 28.5 11.75 14.5 75 Aubry N Ramirez 15559474 511 494 BRHUDSONL18 W99 W87 D76 W94 L32 L38 3.5 19 19 27 11.25 16 76 Ricard Delgadillo 15931371 312 388 LFRANCHOW157 W70 L11 D75 L35 L38 W123 3.5 19 19 25 9.25 16 77 Makayla Cervantes 16124111 554 511 BRBENBRIL6 W97 L72 W106 D83 W89 L36 3.5 18.5 18.5 27.5 11.25 13.5 78 Emma Vela 16111548 417 413 EDBETTSL13 W110 L48 D86 W87 L58 W121 3.5 18 18 25 10.75 12 79 Ignacio Lucio 15866913 235 361 W118 L59 L21 W140 D65 W122 L41 3.5 18 18 25 9.5 14.5 80 Isabella Ramirez 15801022 662 560 BRAACHAML67 D101 W115 W89 L73 W72 L40 3.5 18 18 24.5 12 14 81 Carson Roy Robles 16135765 625 557 PSCARMANW100 L43 W116 L66 W99 D82 L37 3.5 17.5 17.5 25 10.75 16 82 Andres Morin 16224228 355 407 MCRAYBURW141 L52 L27 W144 W88 D81 L35 3.5 17.5 17.5 24 9.25 15 83 Sean Quintanilla 16181661 364 406 LFOLMITOW127 L56 L42 W141 D77 D71 D74 3.5 17.5 17.5 23.5 10 14 84 Aubrey N Cisneros 15824218 308 317 BRAACHAMW129 L21 L29 D123 W154 L39 W132 3.5 16.5 16.5 22.5 7.75 13 85 Mia Pruneda 16217807 165 328 STMARYSBD89 D87 L65 D126 W128 W140 L50 3.5 16 16 22 9.25 13.5 86 Juliet A Olivares 15876307 219 296 HRSAMHOUD34 L66 D152 D78 L68 W139 W126 3.5 16 16 22 9.25 11 87 Christopher Munoz 16168572 224 294 MCPEREZD138 D85 L75 D38 L78 W125 W122 3.5 15.5 15.5 22 10 11.5 88 Marcos L Gonzalez 16234225 498 431 OLS L16 L109 W111 W110 L82 D118 W120 3.5 15 15 22.5 10 11 89 Fernando Chavez 16251721 330 320 SHJENSEND85 W139 L94 L80 W137 L77 W127 3.5 14.5 14.5 20 8.25 13.5 90 90-119 Adrian M Aramburo 16234047 510 580 OLS W25 W33 L15 W72 L54 L29 L62 3.0 26 22 31 13.5 17 91 Austin P Alvarado 16189144 446 448 BRLONGORL22 W55 W141 L54 W114 L17 L72 3.0 22 20 27 9 14 92 R Salinas-Luebert 16250775 111 291 OLS W119 L61 W38 L8 L59 W131 L67 3.0 22 19.5 27.5 10 14 93 Mackenzie Douglas 15931386 698 631 LFRANCHOW63 L2 W131 W102 L18 L53 L47 3.0 21.5 19 27.5 9.5 16 94 Aaron Araiza 16180275 340 343 EDJEFFERW142
Recommended publications
  • Web Appendix
    Online Appendix for “Productivity Shocks, Long-Term Contracts and Earnings Dynamics” Neele Balke∗, Thibaut Lamadon† September 25, 2020 W1 Model web appendix........................ W1 W1.1 Properties of equilibrium functions............ W1 W1.2 Existence of equilibrium................. W9 W2 Identification web appendix.................... W23 W2.1 Data............................ W24 W2.2 Identifying the choice probabilities............ W24 W2.3 Identifying the model parameters............ W26 W2.4 Proofs........................... W27 W3 Data web appendix......................... W43 W3.1 Institutional background................. W43 W3.2 Moments description................... W45 W4 Estimation web appendix..................... W46 W4.1 Numerical solution to the model............. W47 W4.2 Simulating moments.................... W48 W4.3 Optimization........................ W48 W4.4 Computing standard errors................ W49 ∗Kenneth C. Griffin Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, [email protected]. †Kenneth C. Griffin Dept. of Economics, University of Chicago, [email protected], IFAU, IFS and NBER. W1 Model web appendix W1.1 Properties of equilibrium functions In this section, we define the set J of profit functions of the firm and then, taking an arbitrary J ∈ J as given, derive properties of the market tightness, job finding probability, and search and effort policy functions in equilibrium. Definition W1 (Definition of J). Let J be defined as the set of firms’ value functions J : S × V → R such that (J1) For all (x, z) ∈ S and all V1,V2 ∈ V with V1 ≤ V2, the difference J(x, z, V2)− J(x, z, V1) is bounded by −BJ (V2 − V1) and −BJ (V2 − V1) where BJ ≥ BJ > 0 are some constants. (J2) For all (x, z, V ) ∈ S × V, J(x, z, V ) is bounded in [J, J] where J = f(x,z)−u−1 v+c(e)−βv f(x,z)−u−1 v+c(e)−βv 1−β and J = 1−β .
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity / Change: Rethinking Options for Trident Replacement
    CONTINUITY / CHANGE: RETHINKING OPTIONS FOR TRIDENT REPLACEMENT DR. NICK RITCHIE Dr. Nick Ritchie Department of Peace Studies BRADFORD DISARMAMENT RESEARCH CENTRE University of Bradford April 2009 DEPARTMENT OF PEACE STUDIES : UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD : JUNE 2010 About this report This report is part of a series of publications under the Bradford Disarmament Research Centre’s programme on Nuclear-Armed Britain: A Critical Examination of Trident Modernisation, Implications and Accountability. To find out more please visit www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/trident.html. Briefing 1: Trident: The Deal Isn’t Done – Serious Questions Remain Unanswered, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing1.html Briefing 2: Trident: What is it For? – Challenging the Relevance of British Nuclear Weapons, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing2.html. Briefing 3: Trident and British Identity: Letting go of British Nuclear Weapons, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing3.html. Briefing 4: A Regime on the Edge? How Replacing Trident Undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing4.html. Briefing 5: Stepping Down the Nuclear Ladder: Options for Trident on a Path to Zero, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing5.html. About the author Dr. Nick Ritchie is a Research Fellow at the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford. He is lead researcher on the Nuclear-Armed Britain programme. He previously worked for six years as a researcher at the Oxford Research Group on global security issues, in particular nuclear proliferation, arms control and disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support
    Wave 56 Influencer Poll Update January 2018 Public Release Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support 1 Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service 80% 71% 70% 71% 70% 66% 66% 66% 67% 63% 63% 63% 64% 61% 63% 60% 50% 46% 47% 47% 45% 44% 42% 43% 42% 39% 38% 40% 35% 32% 33% 34% 34% 30% 20% 10% Likely to Recommend: % Likely/Very Likely Likely to Support: % Agree/Strongly Agree Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Likely to Recommend Military Service Likely to Support Decision to Join § Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military increased significantly from 67% in 2015 to 70% in 2016. § However, Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military remained stable in January–March 2017. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 2 Questions: q1a–c: “Suppose [relation] came to you for advice about various post-high school options. How likely is it that you would recommend joining a Military Service such as the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard?” q2ff: “If [relation] told me they were planning to join the Military, I would support their decision.” Likelihood to Recommend Military Service By Influencer Type Likelihood to Recommend Military Service 80% 70% 63% 59% 59% 60% 58% 60% 57% 56% 57% 55% 54% 53% 48% 55% 50% 54% 47% 52% 51% 44% 51% 47% 42% 42% 42% 49% 41% 43% 42% 45% 45% 46% 40% 42% 37% 41% 39% 41% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37% 39% 34% 35% 34% 30% 33% 33% 32% 33% 32% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 32% 20% 25% 25% 24% 31% 29% 10% % Likely/Very Likely Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fathers Mothers Grandparents Other Influencers § Influencers’ likelihood to recommend military service remained stable in January–March 2017 for all influencer groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • CHICAGO PUBLIC LEAGUE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP JANUARY 28, 2012 8-Board Varsity Standings No. Name St Rate 1 2
    CHICAGO PUBLIC LEAGUE CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP JANUARY 28, 2012 8-Board Varsity Standings No. Name St Rate 1 2 3 4 Score 1. Northside (2)................. 1398 W7,63.5 W4,63.0 W9,68.0 W2,36.0 4.0 2. Young (1)..................... 1609 W6,68.0 W3,68.0 W5,68.0 L1,32.0 3.0 3. Lane (4)...................... 1372 W10,52.0 L2,0.0 W6,45.0 W5,48.0 3.0 4. Lincoln Park (6).............. 1144 W11,50.0 L1,5.0 W7,63.0 W8,62.0 3.0 5. Jones (5)..................... 1330 W12,63.0 W8,56.0 L2,0.0 L3,20.0 2.0 6. Kelly (7)..................... 1074 L2,0.0 W11,58.0 L3,23.0 W9,65.5 2.0 7. Lake View (8)................. 956 L1,4.5 W12,50.0 L4,5.0 W11,36.0 2.0 8. Marshall (9).................. 866 W9,42.0 L5,12.0 W10,37.0 L4,6.0 2.0 9. Hubbard (3)................... 1373 L8,26.0 W10,35.0 L1,0.0 L6,2.5 1.0 10. Ace (10)...................... 787 L3,16.0 L9,33.0 L8,31.0 W12,64.0 1.0 11. King (11)..................... nnnn L4,18.0 L6,10.0 W12,54.0 L7,32.0 1.0 12. Noble Street (12)............. nnnn L5,5.0 L7,18.0 L11,14.0 L10,4.0 0.0 Board Cross Tables No. Name Rate 1 2 3 4 Score BOARD 1 1. Schmakel, Sam a, Young....................... 2076 W2 W5 W7 W3 4.0 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources During Drought Conditions and Postfire Water Quality in the Upper Rio Hondo Basin, Lincoln County, New Mexico, 2010–13
    Prepared in cooperation with Lincoln County, New Mexico Water Resources During Drought Conditions and Postfire Water Quality in the Upper Rio Hondo Basin, Lincoln County, New Mexico, 2010–13 Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5086 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Top, Burned forest near Bonito Lake after Little Bear Fire in June 2012 (U.S. Geological Survey photograph by Michael J. Darr, July 2012). Bottom, Streamflow-gaging station located on Eagle Creek below South Fork near Alto, New Mexico, April 2013 (left) and July 2013 (right) (U.S. Geological Survey photographs by Lauren R. Sherson). Water Resources During Drought Conditions and Postfire Water Quality in the Upper Rio Hondo Basin, Lincoln County, New Mexico, 2010–13 By Lauren R. Sherson and Steven E. Rice Prepared in cooperation with Lincoln County, New Mexico Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5086 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Iow Imtx Dpa Ndv Eab Eon Rbs Mzv Bdf Mzv Imdw
    (MDWAY6.MDW) 08157 CHICAGO MIDWAY INTL (MDW) MIDWAY SIX DEPARTURE SL-81 (FAA) CHICAGO, ILLINOIS ATIS TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: BADGER 132.75 PETTY 116.4 BAE B Rwys 4L/R, 13C/L, A N42 49.64' CLNC DEL E Chan 111 W87 38.04' 121.85 22L/R, 31C/R, STANDARD. L-28 GND CON Rwys 13R, 31L, NA, ATC. N43^ 07.01' - W88^17.06' 121.65 L-28, H-5 GIPPER MIDWAY TOWER SIMMN DUPAGE 115.4 GIJ G 118.7 226.3 N41 58.84' JI MIDWAY DEP CON W88 52.71' 108.4 DPA APD Chan 101 118.4 388.0 L-28 Chan 21 N41^ 46.12' - W86^ 19.11' N41^ 53.42' - W88^ 21.01' POLO L-28, H-5-10 L-28 LEWKE 111.2 PLL M VZ N41^ 45.72' Chan 49 W87^ 03.80' R-096 N41^ 57.94' 1500 L-28 W89^ 31.45' 315^ 100 L-28 2400 LOCALIZER 109.9 I-MXT IM TX LOCALIZER 109.9 Chan 36 IOWA CITY I-MDW DMI 116.2 IOW I W WO Chan 36 Chan 109 NOTE: Radar required. 135^ N41^ 31.14' NOTE: Chart not to scale. W91^ 36.80' 224^ EC-3, 03 JUL 2008 to 31 L-28, H-5 1400 1300 4 D M E EARND N41^ 25.52' W87^ 34.33' DENNT MOLINE L-28, H-5 N41^ 25.15' 114.4 MZV ZM V CMSKY W87^ 43.48' Chan 91 BACEN N41^ 19.26' N41^ 24.78' L-28, H-5 ACITO N41^ 24.40' W90^ 38.28' W87^ 52.63' N41^23.92' W88^ 01.78' L-27, H-5 L-28, H-5 W88^11.0' L-28, H-5 PEOTONE L-28, H-5 113.2 EON NEO Chan 79 N41^ 16.18' - W87^ 47.46' NEWTT L-28 N41 03.54' BRADFORD W88 04.60' DANVILLE 114.7 BDF B ROBERTS L-27 111.0 DNV D FD N EC-3, 03 JUL 2008 to 31 Chan 94 V 116.8 RBS R Chan 47 B GUIDO N41^ 09.58' S Chan 115 N40^ 17.42' N40 17.63' W89^ 35.27' N40^ 34.90' - W88^ 09.86' W87^ 51.81' W87 33.43' L-27, H-5 L-27, H-5 H-5 L-27, H-5 T DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION TAKE-OFF RWYS 4L/R: Northbound departures assigned headings 360^ (CW) thru 080^, Climbing right turn to 2400 heading 100^ before proceeding on course, thence.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Immersion Thermistor and Rtd Sensors St-W* Series
    TEMPERATURE IMMERSION THERMISTOR AND RTD SENSORS ST-W* SERIES DESCRIPTION The PreCon Model ST-W* Immersion Thermistor and RTD Sensor provides precision remote temperature sensing for building automation systems and mechanical equipment room instrumentation. The active sensing element is a highly stable precision thermistor material or platinum RTD. TCC-12 The sensing element is sealed with a temperature conductive compound in a 4-7/8" (12.4 cm) stainless steel tube and brass fitting. A brass thermowell is the standard well provided with each sensor. A Greenfield connector is factory installed for NEW!flexible connection. The sensor probe assembly is removable from the thermowell for replacement without draining the system. FEATURES • Lifetime warranty • ±0.36°F (±0.2°C) thermistor accuracy ST-W24 • ±1°F (0.53°C) RTD accuracy WEL-B • Wide selection of thermistor and RTD curves • Brass thermowell for quick temperature response • Adaptable with many options • Easy to mount and remove from thermowell • Waterproof stainless steel probe APPLICATION OPTIONS The Model ST-W* is a waterproof sensor featuring a 304 • 304 stainless steel well, maximum temperature 900°F stainless steel probe and brass fitting. The fitting has a 1/2" (482°C),maximum pressure 3000 psig (20,685 kPa) NPT female threads to accept the standard Greenfield fitting. • Handy-box enclosure It has 1/8" NPT male threads for installing into a furnished • Custom lengths (wells available) TEMPERATURE WEL-B thermowell. The thermowells are designed with close • 1/2" LB conduit fitting tolerances, eliminating the need for thermal grease under • Liquid-tight fitting normal conditions. Each well is designed so that the sensor • Weather resistant box assembly can be easily removed after installation.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyword Index
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2014) 39, S692–S709 & 2014 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/14 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Keyword Index 10q24.32 . ............... ................T156 Adolescent Depression . .M198 22q11....................................T37 adolescent development . M100, W223, M133 4-Chlorokynurenine . ....................... W226 adolescent stress . .........................M21 5-HT2A receptor . ....................... W196 ADRA1A . ........................T262 5-HT2C . ................................M130 adrenergic receptor . ....................... W205 5-HT3 receptors........................... W246 adult....................................W82 5-HT7 . ................................ M93 Adversity. ........................M199 5C-CPT . ................................W62 aerobic . ........................M163 5HT5A receptor antagonist....................W191 affective disorders . ........................W80 [11C]carfentanil............................M143 affective neuroscience . M167 affective priming . ........................M112 A African American . ........................T197 aggression . ........... M78, M211, T154, W74 aging..........W31, M181, M223, T54, W30, W31, W227, ABCB gene . ............................ W75 M141, M156, M232, W5, W104 ABCB1 . ................................T254 Agomelatine . ........................W210 Abuse Liability ........................... W160 Agonist . ....................... M266 Abuse Potential ............................W165 agoraphobia
    [Show full text]
  • 16004670.Pdf
    SEMIANNUALHISTORICAL REPORT&> HEADQUARTERS FIEXD COMMAND DEFENSE ATOMIC. SUPPORT AGENCY SANDIA BASE, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO Activities for the Period 1 July 1968 - 31 December 1968 Other Volumes comprising the Field Command, DAsA' . Semiannual Historical Report as of 31 December . ..::... 1968, are as follows: VOLUME I1 - Bossier Base Shreveport , La. VOLUME I11 - Clarksville Base Clarksville, Term. VOLUME IV - Killeen Base Killeen, Texas VOLUME v - Lake'Mead Base Las Vegas , Nevada VOLUME VI - Manzano Base --.A Albuquerque, New Mexico .: _~_..2 .yy: 2 1s VOLUME VI1 - Sandia Base s'.. Albuquerque, New Mexico .: i% HEADQUARTERS FIELD COMMAND DEFENSE ATOMIC SUPPORT AGENCY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. Headquarters Field Command 1 Secretary to the Staff 4 Equal Employment Opportunity Office 11 Inspector General 16 Judge Advocate 25 Public Information Office 30 Surgeon 35 Safety Engineer 40 Chap lain 44 Headquarters & Headquarters Co., USA Element 46 Naval Administrative Unit 50 1090th USAF Special Reporting Group 56 Hqs Sqn Sec, 1090th USAF SRG 60 Comptroller 63 Adjutant General 90 Intelligence and Security D' Lrectorate 106 Personnel Directorate 111 Joint Personnel Plans & Requirements Office 114 , Army Personnel Division 119 Navy Personnel Division 127 Air Force Personnel Division 130 Civilian Personnel Division 134 Personnel Services Division 145 Logistics Directorate 150 Engineering Division 158 Logistics Division 197 Research and Development Liaison Directorate 215 Stockpile Management Directorate 279 Nuclear Materiel Directorate 300
    [Show full text]
  • 119 $159 $99 $99 $129
    You’ve Captured W45 My Heart. in Silver $129 Valentine’s Day February 14th Each piece is engraved, “You’ve Captured W83 My Heart.” LOVEI YOU W46 Diamond Dancers W6 V81 I U In 14K Gold V18 18K Rose Gold Diamonds that Dance Over Silver More to the Beat of Her Heart. W8 $99 More $159 W8 1/4 ctw $799 Reg. $1200 V18 14K $399 Reg. $600 V81 .15 ctw $699 Reg. $1050 W6 14K $599 Reg. $900 18K Yellow Gold Over Silver Silver & 18K Rose Gold Overlay V71 W28 $119 W27 W63 Bridal Sets V70 W29 W27 1 Carat tw $3,299 Reg. $4950 Silver & 18K W28 .55 ctw $1,999 Reg. $3000 $99 Rose Gold Overlay $99 W29 .60 ctw $2,399 Reg. $3600 K44 & K45 V100 K44 & K45 Diamond 1/2 ctw $1,599 V100 1/3 ctw $899 1 ctw $3,199 V101 .20 ctw $699 Celebration Rings V33 1/2 ctw $1,399 in 14K V33 V101 www.dickinsonjewelers.com Diamond Dancers Silver & Diamonds $99 Reg. $150 W61 Cross & in Silver Infinite W54 R98 W62 W51 V106 Love W60 Infinity Necklace W55 W60 $69 Reg. $105 W86 Your Choice $129 Reg. $195 18K Rose Gold My Angel Diamonds that Silver & CZ Over Silver W86 $69 Reg. $105 is With Me Dance to the Beat of her Heart. W61 $99 Reg. $150 W62 Silver & Diamonds $149 Reg. $225 NEW! Swarovski Crystal T83 W51 $199 Reg. $300 in Sterling Silver V64 W52 W52 $199 Reg. $300 Gold & T83 $99 Reg. $150 Faith V106 $159 Reg. $240 Diamonds R60 Pendant in Sterling Silver W89 R60 $149 Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Matters. a Practical Guide 5B
    NUCLEAR MATTERS A Practical Guide Form Approved Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2. REPORT TYPE 2008 00-00-2008 to 00-00-2008 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Nuclear Matters. A Practical Guide 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Office of the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Nuclear REPORT NUMBER Matters),The Pentagon Room 3B884,Washington,DC,20301-3050 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17.
    [Show full text]