DOCSLIB.ORG

IMFAR-Prgm-Bk2011:San Diego.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

International Meeting for Autism Research May 12 -14, 2011 Manchester Grand Hyatt n San Diego, California www.autism-insar.org PROGRAM BOOK IMFAR WELCOME IMFAR is celebrating its 10th anniversary and returning to the site of the first conference, San Diego! We are delighted to welcome everyone to what we feel is our best meeting yet. We believe we have planned a very exciting and informative three days covering the very latest in research focusing on autism. This year the Scientific Program Committee reviewed over 1,000 abstracts from around the world and has put together a solid meeting. As Scientific Program Chair, Dan Geschwind, notes in his remarks, there are a few new events planned in addition to several of IMFAR’s popular features including the Invited Educational Symposia, exceptional keynote speakers, oral sessions, poster presentations, Lifetime Achievement Award and Special Interest Group meetings. We also have a few special surprises planned for the main reception following the presentation of the Lifetime Achievement Award so do not miss it. Planning a meeting like this requires the efforts of some very special people and I would like to acknowledge those who contributed so much of their time and effort to INSAR and the IMFAR event. Along these lines I would like to thank the INSAR Board, the Scientific Program Committee, and the many abstract reviewers who helped ensure the inclusion of the best in autism research. A special thank you goes to Joe Dymek of ConferenceDirect whose invaluable assistance made the job of planning the meeting a pleasure. I would like also to personally acknowledge the members of the Meeting Planning Committee who have worked very hard to make the 2011 IMFAR experience special. Aubyn Stahmer – Meeting Co-Chair Natacha Akshoomoff Laura Hall Stephan Anagnostaras Eric Courchesne Mary Baker-Ericzen Karen Dobkins Lauren Brookman-Frazee Ann Mound Leslie Carver Karen Pierce Christina Corsello Jessica Suhrheinrich Rebecca Gutierrez – Administrative Coordinator Sarah Reed – Staff Volunteer Coordinator Again, welcome to IMFAR 2011 and beautiful San Diego! We hope you enjoy the meeting. Laura Schreibman Meeting Chair TABLE OF CONTENTS Hotel Floor Maps ..................................................4 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE Schedule-At-A-Glance............................................6 Speaker Ready Room .............................................6 In-Conjunction Events............................................9 Meeting Keynote Speakers ...............................................10 Information Awardees ...........................................................11 Acknowledgments ...............................................13 Abstract Author Index.........................................96 General Information...........................................144 Save the Date Exhibitors Listing ..............................................146 Sponsorship ..................................Inside Back Cover 2012 IMFAR Keynote Address.................................................15 Annual Meeting! Invited Educational Symposium.............................15 THURSDAY Oral Sessions .....................................................16 Poster Sessions .................................................18 MAY 12 Invited Educational Symposium.............................29 Oral Sessions .....................................................29 Poster Sessions .................................................32 IMFAR 11th Annual Meeting Keynote Address.................................................45 May 17 – 19, 2012 Invited Educational Symposium.............................45 Sheraton Centre Hotel FRIDAY Oral Sessions .....................................................45 Toronto, Canada Poster Sessions .................................................48 MAY 13 Invited Educational Symposium.............................60 Oral Sessions .....................................................60 Scientific Panels..................................................64 Poster Sessions .................................................67 Special Interest Groups.......................................80 Keynote Address.................................................82 SATURDAY Invited Educational Symposium.............................82 MAY 14 Oral Sessions .....................................................83 Poster Sessions .................................................85 Invited Educational Symposium.............................93 Oral Sessions .....................................................93 Data presented at the Annual International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) is the sole responsibility of the authors. The sponsor of the Annual Meeting, the International Society for Autism Research (INSAR), takes no responsibility for its accuracy. Submitted IMFAR abstracts are reviewed only to ensure that the authors will be presenting empirical data and that aims and conduct of the study, as far as can be ascertained, are consistent with international ethical guidelines for scientific research (Declaration of Helsinki). Acceptance of an abstract for presentation at the Meeting does not represent an endorsement by the Society of the quality or accuracy of the data and their interpretation, which judgment must await publication in a peer review journal. Consumers should recognize that study data presented at meetings is often preliminary and in some cases speculative, and that findings and conclusions have not undergone the rigors of a true peer review process. 1 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM Welcome to IMFAR, 2011. This year marks a true milestone: the 10th anniversary of IMFAR! It seems like only a few years ago that I remember Portia Iversen of Cure Autism Now Foundation proposing that it would be useful to have an international scientific meeting for autism researchers. Given how small the field was, we wondered if there would be sufficient interest and scientific advancement to warrant a meeting, even every other year. This was an unnecessary worry — the field continues to grow rapidly and this year we have broken the 1,000 abstract threshold for the first time. This year the Program Committee has played a large role in designing the program, ranging from choosing the Scientific Panels and Invited Educational Sessions, to organizing the Oral and Poster Sessions. A big thanks to all of those who served on the Scientific Program Committee, especially those who chaired the various sections of the program, each of whom had a major hand in creating this year’s meeting schedule (please see listing of the Program Committee on page 12). The program is continually evolving, but we have essentially kept the successful format developed last year. There are three major types of oral presentations: Invited Educational Sessions (IES), Scientific Panels, and Oral Sessions. The Invited Educational Symposia (IES) were all chosen from a large number of member submissions and represent timely overviews of important advances in the major domains of autism research, ranging from basic science to treatment research. Scientific Panels also represent member submissions, consisting of four closely- linked 15-minute presentations on the same topic or study, chosen by the Program Committee. Similarly, the 2-hour Oral Sessions are comprised of eight abstracts that were organized by the Program Committee to present a series of separate short scientific talks, linked by methods or theme. There are essentially five half-day sessions. To provide an overview of each half-day’s schedule, the entire program is briefly described over the first few pages. Each morning starts with a Keynote Speaker, followed by a Coffee Break. During the next two hours, we have the Invited Educational Symposium (IES), which occurs in parallel with three Oral Sessions. The same format of Oral Sessions and concurrent IES occurs in the afternoons. The only exception is Friday afternoon, when we will have an additional session with the six Scientific Panels and a concurrent Oral Session. Poster Sessions, which comprise the majority of the abstracts, run concurrently each half-day (8:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.) with about 200 posters per session. Presenters will be present for at least the hour indicated by the time stated in the program. The Author Name Index at the back links abstracts to their authors alphabetically by author. Abstract numbers in bold indicate the presenting author. We have also continued the same six Special Interest Groups (SIG) organized last year, but rather than holding them at lunchtime, we are holding them all in the evening on Friday, so as to provide a more casual opportunity to network with those who share similar research interests. Also, we have continued the expanded Technology Demonstration Session that will take place on Friday morning, where innovative developments in technology related to autism research and practice are presented in poster format. New this year is a special luncheon “Meet the Experts” to provide students and fellows the opportunity to network with professors. The idea is to provide an informal venue for students to meet professors whose work, career path, or techniques they would like to discuss in more depth. We are starting this as an experiment this year, so spaces are limited. Since we are talking about lunch, each registrant will receive a $50 gift card good at the hotel and local restaurants, including Seaport Village nearby for daily lunch breaks. Several special presentations
Recommended publications
  • The Effects and Feasibility of Using Tiered Instruction to Increase Conversational Turn Taking for Preschoolers with and Without Disabilities

    The Effects and Feasibility of Using Tiered Instruction to Increase Conversational Turn Taking for Preschoolers with and Without Disabilities

    THE EFFECTS AND FEASIBILITY OF USING TIERED INSTRUCTION TO INCREASE CONVERSATIONAL TURN TAKING FOR PRESCHOOLERS WITH AND WITHOUT DISABILITIES A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College and Graduate School of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Sandra Hess Robbins May 2013 © Copyright, 2013 by Sandra Hess Robbins All Rights Reserved ii A dissertation written by Sandra Hess Robbins B.S.Ed., University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, 2002 M.Ed., Kent State University, 2006 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ____________________, Co-director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kristie Pretti-Frontcak ____________________, Co-director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Sanna Harjusola-Webb ____________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Christine Balan ____________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Richard Cowan Accepted by ____________________, Director, School of Lifespan Development and Educational Mary Dellman-Jenkins Sciences ____________________, Dean, College of Education, Health, and Human Services Daniel F. Mahony iii ROBBINS, SANDRA HESS, Ph.D., May 2013 Lifespan Development and Educational Sciences THE EFFECTS AND FEASIBILITY OF USING TIERED INSTRUCTION TO INCREASE CONVERSATIONAL TURN TAKING FOR PRESCHOOLERS WITH AND WITHOUT DISABILITIES (282 pp.) Co-Directors of Dissertation: Kristie Pretti-Frontczak, Ph.D. Sanna Harjusola-Webb, Ph.D. The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness and feasibility of using tiered instruction to increase the frequency of conversational turn taking (CTT) among preschoolers with and without disabilities in an inclusive setting. Three CTT interventions (Universal Design for Learning, Peer Mediated Instruction, and Milieu Teaching) were organized on a hierarchy of intensity and implemented in an additive manner.
  • IN the UNITED STATES COURT of FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE of SPECIAL MASTERS No. 01-162V Filed: February 12, 2009 to Be Published

    IN the UNITED STATES COURT of FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE of SPECIAL MASTERS No. 01-162V Filed: February 12, 2009 to Be Published

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 01-162V Filed: February 12, 2009 To Be Published * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COLTEN SNYDER, by and through * KATHRYN SNYDER and JOSEPH SNYDER, * his natural guardians and next friends * Omnibus Autism * Proceeding; * Autism Spectrum Disorder, * Pervasive Developmental * Disorder, Causation, Petitioners, * Measles, MMR, Mercury, * Thimerosal, Waiver v. * Applying Daubert, * Weight of Expert Opinions, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT * Credibility of Witnesses OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Christopher W. Wickersham, Sr., Esq., Lloyd Bowers, Esq., and Thomas B. Powers, Esq., for petitioners. Alexis S. Babcock, Esq., Katherine Esposito, Esq., Voris Johnson, Esq., and Vincent Matanoski, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION1 Vowell, Special Master: On March 22, 2001, Kathryn and Joseph Snyder [“petitioners”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 1 Vaccine Rule 18(b) provides the parties 14 days to request redaction of any material “(i) which is trade secret or commercial or financial information which is privileged and confidential, or (ii) which are medical files and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa12(d)(4)(B). Petitioners have waived their right to request such redaction. See Petitioners’ Notice to W aive the 14-Day “W aiting” Period as Defined in Vaccine Rule 18(b), filed December 2, 2008. Respondent also waived the right to object to the disclosure of information submitted by respondent. See Respondent’s Consent to Disclosure, filed January 14, 2009. Accordingly, this decision will be publicly available immediately after it is filed.
  • Women with High Functioning ASD: Relationships and Sexual Health

    Women with High Functioning ASD: Relationships and Sexual Health

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2020 Women with High Functioning ASD: Relationships and Sexual Health Isabelle Taylor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the Developmental Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Isabelle, "Women with High Functioning ASD: Relationships and Sexual Health" (2020). CMC Senior Theses. 2553. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2553 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Women with High Functioning ASD: Relationships and Sexual Health A Literature Review and Proposed Workshop Manual Submitted to Professor Caitlyn Gumaer By Isabelle Taylor for Senior Thesis 2020 November 30 Table of Contents Author’s Note.................................................................................................................................. 1 Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 2 Literature Review.................................................................................................................... 3 - 38 Symptoms and Diagnosis.............................................................................................. 3 - 7 Gender Differences.....................................................................................................
  • IMFAR 2010 Disclosure Report *Indicates Presenting Author

    IMFAR 2010 Disclosure Report *Indicates Presenting Author

    IMFAR 2010 Disclosure Report *indicates presenting author Final Name Title Relationships Number 104.005 * R. B. Beaumont The Secret Agent Society: A Multimedia The Social Skills Training Institute: Curriculum for Enhancing the Social Skills of Employment (full or part-time) Children with Asperger's Disorder The Social Skills Training Institute: Receipt of royalties 104.007 R. L. Koegel Type, Function, and Complexity of Koegel Autism Consultants: Ownership or Language Gains in Young Children with partnership Autism Spectrum Disorder Following Behavioral Intervention 104.007 L. K. Koegel Type, Function, and Complexity of Koegel Autism Consultants: Ownership or Language Gains in Young Children with partnership Autism Spectrum Disorder Following Behavioral Intervention 104.008 R. L. Koegel Using the Tools of the Trade: The ADOS as a Koegel Autism Consultants: Ownership or Measure of Treatment Change partnership 104.008 L. K. Koegel Using the Tools of the Trade: The ADOS as a Koegel Autism Consultants: Ownership or Measure of Treatment Change partnership 105.002 A. S. Carter Relationship Between Sensory Over- Alice S. Carter: Receipt of royalties Responsivity and Anxiety in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: 105.007 A. S. Carter Early Sensory Over-Responsivity and Alice S. Carter: Receipt of royalties Affective Symptoms of Children with ASD and Later Family Impairment 105.01 A. M. Wetherby Early Red Flags for Autism Spectrum Author: Other: AW is an author of the Disorders in Toddlers in the Home Early Screening for Autism and Environment Communication Disorders (ESAC) Author: Non-remunerative Brookes Publishing: Other: AW is an author of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS) Brookes Publishing: Receipt of royalties 105.011 W.
  • Immune Dysfunction and Autoimmunity As Pathological Mechanisms in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Immune Dysfunction and Autoimmunity As Pathological Mechanisms in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    REVIEW published: 13 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00405 Immune Dysfunction and Autoimmunity as Pathological Mechanisms in Autism Spectrum Disorders Heather K. Hughes 1,2, Emily Mills Ko 1,2, Destanie Rose 1,2 and Paul Ashwood 1,2* 1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States, 2 MIND Institute, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a group of heterogeneous neurological disorders that are highly variable and are clinically characterized by deficits in social interactions, communication, and stereotypical behaviors. Prevalence has risen from 1 in 10,000 in 1972 to 1 in 59 children in the United States in 2014. This rise in prevalence could be due in part to better diagnoses and awareness, however, these together cannot solely account for such a significant rise. While causative connections have not been proven in the majority of cases, many current studies focus on the combined effects of genetics and environment. Strikingly, a distinct picture of immune dysfunction has emerged and been supported by many independent studies over the past decade. Many players in the immune-ASD puzzle may be mechanistically contributing to pathogenesis of these disorders, including skewed cytokine responses, differences in total numbers and frequencies of immune cells and their subsets, neuroinflammation, and adaptive and Edited by: innate immune dysfunction, as well as altered levels of immunoglobulin and the presence Jijun Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China of autoantibodies which have been found in a substantial number of individuals with Reviewed by: ASD. This review summarizes the latest research linking ASD, autoimmunity and immune Andreas Martin Grabrucker, dysfunction, and discusses evidence of a potential autoimmune component of ASD.
  • Different Minds

    Different Minds

    DIFFERENT MINDS if there’s one thing Ralph Or not. the fact that there are few AN INFECTIOUS THEORY Adolphs wants you to under- absolutes is part of why the set of dis- Much of that insight comes from Pat- stand about autism, it’s this: “it’s orders—autism, Asperger’s, pervasive terson, who pioneered the study of the wrong to call many of the people developmental disorder not otherwise connections between the brain and the on the autism spectrum impaired,” says specified (PDD-NOS)—that fall under immune system in autism, schizophrenia, the Caltech neuroscientist. “they’re autism’s umbrella are referred to as and depression a decade ago. simply different.” a spectrum. As with the spectrum of the main focus of that connection? these differences are in no way insig- visible light—where red morphs into Some kind of viral infection during preg- nificant—they are, after all, why so much orange, which morphs into yellow— nancy, Patterson explains. Or, rather, the effort and passion is being put into un- it is difficult to draw sharp lines immune response that infection inevitably derstanding autism’s most troublesome between the various diagnoses in engenders. traits—but neither are they as inevitably the autism spectrum. to bolster his argument, Patterson devastating as has often been depicted. And, like the autism spectrum itself, points to a recent study by hjordis O. they are simply differences; intriguing, the spectrum of autism research at Atladottir of Aarhus University, Denmark, fleeting glimpses into minds that work in Caltech also runs a gamut. Adolphs, and colleagues—“an extraordinary look at ways most of us don’t quite understand, for example, studies brain differences over 10,000 autism cases” in the Danish and yet which may ultimately give each between adults on the high-functioning Medical Register, which is a comprehen- and every one of us a little more insight portion of the autism spectrum and the sive database of every Dane’s medical into our own minds, our own selves.
  • UC San Francisco Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC San Francisco Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCSF UC San Francisco Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Anticipating Autism: Navigating Science, Uncertainty, and Care in the Post-Genomic Era Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h13w1wf Author Lappe, Martine Danielle Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Anticipating Autism: Navigating Science, Uncertainty, and Care in the Post-Genomic Era by Martine Danielle Lappe DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Sociology in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO Copyright 2012 by Martine Danielle Lappé ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the generosity and support of many people. I want to especially thank the parents, scientists and advocates who shared their experiences and perspectives with me, answering my questions with patience and candor. This research would not have been possible without them. I also owe a debt of gratitude to the coordinators and staff of the epidemiologic study I followed. I want to thank Kristine Wise and McKenzie Oliver in particular, for going above and beyond to help facilitate my research. I have been very fortunate to have an incredibly thoughtful, generous and inspiring dissertation committee to guide me through this process. My chair Adele Clarke has been a trusted resource and caring advisor. Her mentorship has nourished my thinking and supported this project from its beginning. I am particularly grateful to her for helping me make important theoretical and empirical connections, and for always asking thought-provoking questions. This dissertation would not have been possible without her incredible balance of cheerleading and encouragement, cultivated over an inspiring career.
  • IN the UNITED STATES COURT of FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE of SPECIAL MASTERS No

    IN the UNITED STATES COURT of FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE of SPECIAL MASTERS No

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 01-162V Filed: February 12, 2009 To Be Published * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COLTEN SNYDER, by and through * KATHRYN SNYDER and JOSEPH SNYDER, * his natural guardians and next friends * Omnibus Autism * Proceeding; * Autism Spectrum Disorder, * Pervasive Developmental * Disorder, Causation, Petitioners, * Measles, MMR, Mercury, * Thimerosal, Waiver v. * Applying Daubert, * Weight of Expert Opinions, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT * Credibility of Witnesses OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Christopher W. Wickersham, Sr., Esq., Lloyd Bowers, Esq., and Thomas B. Powers, Esq., for petitioners. Alexis S. Babcock, Esq., Katherine Esposito, Esq., Voris Johnson, Esq., and Vincent Matanoski, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION1 Vowell, Special Master: On March 22, 2001, Kathryn and Joseph Snyder [“petitioners”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 1 Vaccine Rule 18(b) provides the parties 14 days to request redaction of any material “(i) which is trade secret or commercial or financial information which is privileged and confidential, or (ii) which are medical files and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa12(d)(4)(B). Petitioners have waived their right to request such redaction. See Petitioners’ Notice to W aive the 14-Day “W aiting” Period as Defined in Vaccine Rule 18(b), filed December 2, 2008. Respondent also waived the right to object to the disclosure of information submitted by respondent. See Respondent’s Consent to Disclosure, filed January 14, 2009. Accordingly, this decision will be publicly available immediately after it is filed.
  • Environmental Health Issue

    Environmental Health Issue

    FIFTH EDITION 2006, Volume 45 R5 Environmental Health and Autism In thIs Issue: Time To GeT a Grip By martha r. Herbert, m.D., ph.D. Beyond Behavior—Biomedical Diagnoses in Autism spectrum Disorders By Margaret L. Bauman, M.D. transforming the Public Debate on neurotoxicants By Elise Miller, M.Ed. ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Autism does not have to be a life sentence You’re not about to give up on your child. Neither Are We. Since , the Autism Treatment Center of America™ has provided innovative training programs for parents and professionals caringifor children challenged by Autism Spectrum Disorders and related developmental difficulties. • Practical Tools • Powerful Results • Limitless Hope c Help your child improve in all areas of over p learning, development, communication and hoto skill acquisition. : © W I Join us for our internationally-acclaimed ll T ERR Son-Rise Program® Start-Up, a y comprehensive weeklong training program for parents and professionals. We don’t put limits on the possibilities for your child. Free 25-Minute Initial Call 877-766-7473 We’ll give you the keys to unlock their world. HOME OF THE SON-RISE PROGRAM® SINCE 1983 South Undermountain Road Sheffield, MA - USA Telephone: -- • E-mail: [email protected] www.autismtreatment.com Copyright © 2006 by The Option Institute & Fellowship. All rights reserved. 02.06-6 CONTENTS December 2006 page 18 SpOTlIGHT Time to Get A Grip By marTHa r. HerBerT, m.D., pH.D. Does an environmental role in autism make sense? How do we decide? And if environment is involved in autism, what do we do about it? These are challenging questions.
  • (!Congress of Tbe ~Niteb ~Tates ~A~Btngton, Tjb(( 20510

    (!Congress of Tbe ~Niteb ~Tates ~A~Btngton, Tjb(( 20510

    (!Congress of tbe ~niteb ~tates ~a~btngton, tJB(( 20510 August 1, 2016 The Honorable Dr. John King Secretary of Education U.S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20202 Attn: Meredith Miller Re: Notice ofProposed Rulemaking Docket ID ED-2016-0ESE-0032, Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act­ Accountability and State Plans Dear Secretary King: In negotiating the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) with our colleagues, we fought to preserve the Department of Education's (Department) full regulatory authority to promulgate rules and issue guidance. We applaud the Department's notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on 34 CFR parts 200 and 299 for balancing ESSA' s strong and clearly articulated federal guardrails with the new law's flexibility for state and local decision-making. The Department's unique role in upholding the civil rights legacy of this law is critical to ensure implementation honors Congressional intent that states and local educational agencies sufficiently support improving outcomes for the nation's disadvantaged students, including through improving equity of educational opportunity. While Congress replaced much of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) with new statutory requirements in ESSA, the new law maintains the historic and bipartisan focus of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) on improving educational outcomes for our nation's disadvantaged students, including low-income students, students of color, students with disabilities, and English learners. In putting forth the proposed regulations, the Department employed its regulatory authority to articulate parameters that will empower states and school districts to use the new flexibility that ESSA affords.
  • IMFAR 2004 Program Book

    IMFAR 2004 Program Book

    2004 PROGRAM Friday & Saturday May 7 – 8, 2004 The Hyatt Hotel Sacramento, California 1 I M F A R Acknowledgements Board Members Program Committee President David Amaral Linda Daly Marian Sigman, PhD University of California, Davis University of California, Los MIND Institute Petrus de Vries Angeles Cambridge University Anthony Bailey Oxford University Glen Dunlap Vice President Sally Rogers, PhD University of South Florida Grace Baranek University of California, Davis University of North Carolina at MIND Institute Chapel Hill Deborah Fein University of Connecticut Treasurer Simon Baron-Cohen Edwin Cook, MD Cambridge University Eric Fombonne University of Chicago McGill University Marlene Behrmann Secretary Carnegie Mellon University Christopher Gillberg Diane Chugani, PhD Hill Goldsmith Wayne State University Susan Bookheimer University of California, Los University of Wisconsin Program Chair Angeles Robin Hansen Nancy Minshew, MD University of California, Davis University of Pittsburgh Medical Dermot Bowler City University Center Sandra Harris Rutgers University Membership Chair Marie Bristol-Power Robert Schultz, PhD Robert Hendren Yale University Jacob Burak University of California, Davis McGill University Nominations Chair Susan Hyman Joseph Piven, MD Tony Charman University of Rochester University of North Carolina University College London Chapel Hill Bob Joseph Diane Chugani Boston University School of Publications Chair Wayne State University/ Medicine David Amaral, PhD Children’s Hospital of Michigan University of California,
  • Infant Brain Imaging Study Network an NIH Autism Centers of Excellence (ACE) Network: IACC Meeting Washington, D.C. April 2011

    Infant Brain Imaging Study Network an NIH Autism Centers of Excellence (ACE) Network: IACC Meeting Washington, D.C. April 2011

    Infant Brain Imaging Study Network an NIH Autism Centers of Excellence (ACE) Network University of North Carolina University of Washington Washington University in St. Louis Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Montreal Neurological Institute University of Utah University of Alberta Principal Investigator: Joe Piven Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities University of North Carolina IACC Meeting Washington, D.C. April 2011 IBIS (Infant Brain Imaging Study) Network NIH Autism Center of Excellence (www.ibis-network.org ) “A Longitudinal MRI Study of Infants at Risk for Autism” Infant Siblings of 6 months 12 months 24 months Older Autistic Children Rationale for the IBIS Network: (1) onset of brain overgrowth and (2) onset of autistic behavior both appear to occur in the latter part of the first year of life in autistic individuals Studies Reporting Increased Brain Volume (5-10%) in Autism MRI Studies Brain Volume Subject Age Piven et al. (1992) increased mid-sagittal area 18 - 53 yrs Piven et al (1995) increased total brain volume 14 – 29 yrs Hazlett et al (2005) increased total brain volume (N=51) 2 yrs Courchesne et al (2001) increased cerebral. gray and white 2 – 4 yrs only Sparks et al (2002) increased total cerebral 3-4 yrs Aylward et al (2002) increased TBV (HFA) under 12 yrs Lotspeich et al (2004) increased cerebral gray (N=52) 7 – 18 yr Herbert et al (2004) increased (radiate) white matter (N=13) ~ 9 yrs Palmen et al (2005) increased TBV, cerebral gray (N=21) 7 – 15 yrs Schultz et al (unpub) increased TBV, GM, WM (N=117) 7-36 yrs Hyde et al, (2008) increased gray vol (VBM + cortical thick) young adults Freitag et al, (2009) increased TBV, GM and WM (N=15) HFA adol/adult Hardan et al, (2006) increased TBV, gray/cortical thick 17 HFA children Schuman et al (2010) increased cerebral gray and white 2-5 yrs Increased Brain Volume Noted by Two Years of Age MRI Studies Brain Volume Subject Age Piven et al.