Westward Expansion: Texas Annexation Timeline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Westward Expansion: Texas Annexation Timeline Name:_____________________________________ Date:____________ Period:______ Westward Expansion: Texas Annexation Timeline Task: In small groups, you will be asked to create a piece of a timeline about Texas’ “road to independence”. For your activity, you will read the document assigned to your group, answer the fill in the blanks on your worksheet, and create your poster. You will present your posters to the class at the end of the period and they will be displayed in the classroom for your classmates to see! Your poster must include the following: The name of the event and year (s) it occurred A choice of your own, a paragraph summarizing the main ideas of the event OR bulleted list of the chronological order of the events. This should include the cause of the event, an explanation of the event itself and the result/outcome. You must use all the names and terms listed below your group. BE AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE AND USE YOUR OWN WORDS! Group 1: Group 4: 1820s: Stephen Austin leads Americans into Texas March 1836: Battle of the Alamo April 1836: Battle of San Jacinto Words/names to use: Words/names to use: Farming, Stephen Austin, Mexico, Texas Independence, Texas, Mexico, Santa Anna, Sam Houston, siege, Alamo, Lone Star Republic Group 2: 1830s-35s: Mexico tightens control over Texas Group 5: Word/ names to use: 1836: Texas wins independence Santa Anna, dictator, Texas, Mexico Words/names to use: Independence, Texas, Mexico, Sam Houston Group 3: 1835: Texans declare their independence Group 6: 1845 United States annexes Texas Words/ names to use: Independence, Texas, Mexico, Santa Anna, San Antonio, Sam Words/names to use: Houston Annexation (for and against and why) North and South, expansion of slavery, Texas, Mexico Group One: Stephen Austin leads Americans into Texas Texas was a part of Mexico under Spanish control. The Mexican government allowed Americans to settle in Texas. The Mexicans also sold land to America at a cheap price in exchange for American settlers agreed to become Mexican citizens. Stephen Austin lead many Americans to settle in Texas. What did the Mexicans hope the Americans would help with? Help develop land and control Indian Attacks. Group Two: Mexico tightens control over Texas; The Mexican government was not enforcing their laws in Texas at first. In 1830, Mexico feared that Texas would revolt against Mexican rule. Many American settlers who lived in Texas felt more connected with the U.S; both spoke English, practiced Protestantism and had similar customs. Mexico closed Texas to American settlement in 1830. They banned slavery and forced Texans to worship the Catholic Church. This angered the settlers as they felt threatened by the Mexican troops who came north to enforce them. In 1835, tensions got worse. Military dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna came to power. Why would Santa Anna want to drive out the Americans? They were taking over, not following laws- fear of revolt. Group Three: Texans declare their independence: Texans, along with Mexicans did not like Santa Anna’s rise to power. Stephen Austin and many throughout Texas fought many battles for their independence from Mexico. In October 1835, Texans in the town of Gonzales clashed with Mexican troops. They forced the troops to withdraw. Inspired by that victory, Stephen Austin vowed to see “Texas forever free from Mexican domination”. In December of 1835, Texans won a military battle in San Antonio Three months later, on March 2, 1836, Texans declare their independence. They rename themselves the Republic of Texas and elected their first president Sam Houston. One major problem was that Texans still had to defeat the Mexican army to fully become independent. What role did Stephen Austin play in gaining Texas Independence? He promised them he would free Texas from Mexican rule. Group Four: Battle of the Alamo / Battle of San Jacinto After the Battle in San Antonio, many Texans fighters did not believe they had a chance against the Mexican army. Those who remained, retreated to an old Spanish mission called the Alamo. This would quickly become a fort for them. Colonel William Travis had only 157 men but were experienced fighters. Texans were low on food, water, medicine and ammunition. Beginning on February 23, 1826, 6,000 Mexican troops began to siege on the Alamo. This will for twelve days, but the fort held strong and they held off the Mexican troops. Finally, on March 6, a Mexican cannon fire broke through the Alamo walls. Mexican troops stormed in killing all but five Texans inside. Those five will later be executed on Santa Anna’s orders. After the slaughter of the Alamo, Texans wanted revenge. The slogan “remember the Alamo” was used as a battle cry. Many Texans and the United States joined the Texan cause. On April 21, 1836, Houston’s army defeated the Mexican army in the Battle of San Jacinto. Houston forced Santa Anna to surrender and grant Texas its independence. The new nation of Texas was then nicknamed the Lone Star Republic Mexico will never officially recognize this. Why do you think Santa Anna surrendered? He was forced to after Houston defeated him in the Battle of San Jacinto. Group Five: Texas wins independence: Although Mexico never officially recognizes Texas as independent, Texas elects Sam Houston as the first president of the Republic of Texas. Houston faced many problems though. The country was in debt, has no deal with the Indian attacks in small communities and the fact that Mexico does not recognize their independence. Houston believes the only solution to his problem is to be annexed (or added) to the United States. Why do you think Mexico refused to recognize the independence of Texas? They wanted to keep the land and believed it was theirs. Group Six: United States annexes Texas: Americans were divided about whether to annex Texas. Southerners generally favored it because they will gain land and Texas would allow slavery. Northerners did not favor annexation because they did NOT want slavery to expand. It would also likely lead to a war with Mexico. Despite many objections, the U.S. annexed Texas in 1845. Texas becomes the 28th state. What is the impact of Texas being annexed to the United States? It will lead to war with Mexico. .
Recommended publications
  • The Dispute Over the Annexation of Texas and Opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's Independence, the Nueces River Was R
    American Studies Mr. Carlson The Dispute over the Annexation of Texas and opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's independence, the Nueces River was recognized as the northern boundary of Mexico. Spain had fixed the Nueces as a border in 1816, and the United States ratified it in the 1819 treaty by which the United States had purchased Florida and renounced claims to Texas. Even following Mexico's independence from Spain, American and European cartographers fixed the Texas border at the Nueces. When Texas declared its independence, however, it claimed as its territory an additional 150 miles of land, to the Rio Grande. With the annexation of Texas in 1845, the United States adopted Texas's position and claimed the Rio Grande as the border. Mexico broke diplomatic relations with the United States and refused to recognize either the Texas annexation or the Rio Grande border. President James Polk sent a special envoy, John L. Slidell, to propose cancellation of Mexico's debt to United States citizens who had incurred damages during the Mexican Revolution, provided Mexico would formally recognize the Rio Grande boundary. Slidell was also authorized to offer the Mexican government up to $30 million for California and New Mexico. Between Slidell's arrival on December 6, 1845, and his departure in March 1846, the regime of President Jose Herrara was overthrown and a fervently nationalistic government under General Mariano Paredes seized power. Neither leader would speak to Slidell. When Paredes publicly reaffirmed Mexico's claim to all of Texas, Slidell left in a temper, convinced that Mexico should be "chastised." American Studies Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Houston New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Project
    Central Houston New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Project ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 Camden Downtown I 271 2 Broadstone Summer Street 375 3 Lincoln Heights 292 4 St Andrie 232 5 Aspire At 610 282 6 South Main Building 186 7 Le Palais 165 45 8 Dolce Midtown 201 9 Pearl Marketplace At Midtown 264 10 Drewery Place 357 46 11 Regalia At The Park 229 48 12 Preston, The (High Rise) 373 49 3 13 13 Broadstone Heights Waterworks 309 23 21 14 City Place Memorial Park 264 15 Broadstone Arts District 327 16 Broadstone 15th Street Flats 337 16 17 Alta Washington Avenue 204 18 Alexan Lower Heights 375 19 Alexan Memorial 356 20 Crest at Taylor 381 21 Chase Heights I (High Rise) 152 22 Westcott, The (High Rise) 315 43 47 23 Chase Heights II 284 24 Hanover River Oaks (High Rise) 370 25 Gables Westcreek (High Rise) 295 17 20 50 18 51 26 Reverie At River Hollow 304 44 2 15 27 Novel River Oaks 330 22 4 28 Alexan Lynn Park 383 29 Alta West Alabama 304 30 Briar Hollow (High Rise) 200 19 14 12 11 31 Alta Med Main 338 64 32 La Columbe d'Or (High Rise) 285 66 26 37 67 33 2111 Austin 216 42 34 40 34 Montrose At Buffalo Bayou 224 7 8 30 36 1 35 Travis, The (High Rise) 336 39 61 41 36 Driscoll, The (High Rise) 318 68 37 Alta River Oaks 364 54 33 63 9 59 65 38 Broadstone Museum Dist (Hi-Rise) 325 25 10 62 39 1810 Main (High Rise) 290 27 52 32 35 40 800 Crawford (High Rise) 314 24 58 41 Camden Downtown II (High Rise) 289 28 29 42 Navigation Blvd Site 293 53 43 Standard Heights 301 44 Vic, The 165 38 45 1001 West 34th Site 392 46 Slate Heights 287 60 47 White Oak Highline
    [Show full text]
  • San Jacinto Battleground Award
    THE BATTLE OF SAN JACINTO APRIL 21, 1836 San Jacinto Monument and Sam Houston Area Council Museum of History Boy Scouts of America SAM HOUSTON AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INSTRUCTIONS FOR SAN JACINTO BATTLEFIELD HIKE Thank you for your interest in Texas heritage. We believe that this cooperative effort between the Sam Houston Area Council Boy Scouts and the State of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department will not only prove to be fun but highly interesting and instructive for all. This package includes a map of the San Jacinto Monument State Historical Park, five (5) sets of narratives to be read to your group at specific points during your hike, and a request for patches to be completed at the end of your hike. To qualify for the patch each participant must follow the trail as indicated on the map and participate (reading or listening) in each of the five (5) narratives at the proper points. Here's how it goes: 1. Get your pack, troop, crew, ship or post together on any day of the year preferably in uniform. 2. Drive to the San Jacinto Monument at the Historical Park in La Porte. Park in the parking provided around the monument. Disembark your unit and walk back to Point A (circled A). Reading Stops are defined on your map with circles around the numbers 1 through 5. Monuments are defined with squares around the numbers 1 through 20. 3. At Point 1 (Monument 11) have one or more of your group read History Stop Program Stop 1 narrative to the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Moffette Lea (Wife of General Sam Houston)
    Margaret Moffette Lea (Wife of General Sam Houston) Margaret Moffette Lea was born 11 April 1819 in Marion (Perry County), Alabama, one of four daughters born to Temple Lea and Nancy Moffette. She was a granddaughter of George Lea and Lucy Tolbert (Talbert) and a great granddaughter of Captain William (South Hico) Lea of Caswell County, North Carolina. Captain William Lea was a brother of James (Kilgore’s Branch) Lea of Caswell County, North Carolina. These two brothers, William and James Lea were among the founding families of Caswell County. Margaret Mofette Lea was a first cousin to Thomas Lee. Their father's (Temple Lea and Ransom Lea) were brothers. Temple Lea and Ransom Lea moved from Georgia to Alabama. Margaret's genealogical line leads to the Lea family of Virginia. In Star of Destiny: The Private Life of Sam and Margaret Houston, Madge Thornall Roberts (Foreword by Ralph B. Campbell) (1993)1 at pages two and eight the following is found: Margaret Moffett Lea came from an Alabama family of distinguished men that included soldiers, lawyers, and laymen active in the state government, so it would not seem impossible that she could be introduced to so famous a man as Sam Houston. Margaret carried the name of one of the most distinguished families of the south. Her father, 1 "Much is known about Sam Houston's political and military career, but until Star of Destiny the influence of his wife and children on his life have been overlooked. Written by the great-great-grandaughter of Sam Houston and Margaret Lea, who draws upon previously unpublished family letters between husband and wife to reveal a deep interdependency between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • 1872: Survivors of the Texas Revolution
    (from the 1872 Texas Almanac) SURVIVORS OF THE TEXAS REVOLUTION. The following brief sketches of some of the present survivors of the Texas revolution have been received from time to time during the past year. We shall be glad to have the list extended from year to year, so that, by reference to our Almanac, our readers may know who among those sketches, it will be seen, give many interesting incidents of the war of the revolution. We give the sketches, as far as possible, in the language of the writers themselves. By reference to our Almanac of last year, (1871) it will be seen that we then published a list of 101 names of revolutionary veterans who received the pension provided for by the law of the previous session of our Legislature. What has now become of the Pension law? MR. J. H. SHEPPERD’S ACCOUNT OF SOME OF THE SURVIVORS OF THE TEXAS REVOLUTION. Editors Texas Almanac: Gentlemen—Having seen, in a late number of the News, that you wish to procure the names of the “veteran soldiers of the war that separated Texas from Mexico,” and were granted “pensions” by the last Legislature, for publication in your next year’s Almanac, I herewith take the liberty of sending you a few of those, with whom I am most intimately acquainted, and now living in Walker and adjoining counties. I would remark, however, at the outset, that I can give you but little information as to the companies, regiments, &c., in which these old soldiers served, or as to the dates, &c., of their discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Ideas for a Destined Conflict
    Lesson Ideas for A Destined Conflict Excerpts from Curriculum Guide For Teaching Texas History Written by Yvonne Pittman, Educational Consultant Assisted by M. Elizabeth Appleby, Curator and Lisa A. Struthers, Library Director San Jacinto Museum of History This work was made possible through funding from: Fondren Foundation LyondellBasell Meadows Foundation Houston Endowment Inc. The Gordon A. Cain Foundation Elkins Foundation Union Pacific Foundation BNSF Railway Foundation San Jacinto Day Foundation The Dow Chemical Company H-E-B Tournament of Champions Written by Yvonne Pittman, Educational Consultant Assisted by M. Elizabeth Appleby, Curator and Lisa A. Struthers, Library Director San Jacinto Museum of History Copyright 2015 San Jacinto Museum of History Published by the San Jacinto Museum of History One Monument Circle La Porte, Texas 77571-9585 281-479-2421 www.sanjacinto-museum.org [email protected] August 17, 2015 Contents Lesson Plans Lesson Plan: Texas Annexation 1 Lesson Plan: Mexican War and Early Statehood 14 Strategy Descriptions and Graphic Organizers SDA Document Analysis 20 Walk-About Review 22 Historical Markers Activity 23 Propaganda Exercise 24 Introduction The goal of this guide is to enhance your students’ visit to the exhibit A Destined Conflict: The U.S. - Mexican War. The lessons were excerpted from Curriculum Guide for Teaching Texas History, which is available for download at http://www.sanjacinto- museum.org/Education/For_Teachers/. Lesson documents are in PDF format for ease of downloading, but Word versions are available to teachers on request to insure modifications are simple for classroom use. Related images are at https://sanjacinto- museum.smugmug.com/CurriculumGuide in the 4B Texas Annexation and 4C-Statehood sections.
    [Show full text]
  • SAM HOUSTON PARK: Houston History Through the Ages by Wallace W
    PRESERVATION The 1847 Kellum-Noble House served as Houston Parks Department headquarters for many years. Photo courtesy of Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, HABS, Reproduction number HABS TEX, 101-HOUT, 4-1. SAM HOUSTON PARK: Houston History through the Ages By Wallace W. Saage he history of Texas and the history of the city grant from Austin’s widow, Mrs. J. F. L. Parrot, and laid Tof Houston are inextricably linked to one factor out a new city.1 They named it Houston. – land. Both Texas and Houston used the legacy of The growth of Sam Houston Park, originally called the land to encourage settlement, bringing in a great City Park, has always been closely related to the transfer multicultural mélange of settlers that left a lasting im- of land, particularly the physical and cultural evolution pression on the state. An early Mexican land grant to of Houston’s downtown region that the park borders. John Austin in 1824 led to a far-reaching development Contained within the present park boundaries are sites ac- plan and the founding of a new city on the banks of quired by the city from separate entities, which had erected Buffalo Bayou. In 1836, after the Republic of Texas private homes, businesses, and two cemeteries there. won its independence, brothers John Kirby Allen and Over the years, the city has refurbished the park, made Augustus C. Allen purchased several acres of this changes in the physical plant, and accommodated the increased use of automobiles to access a growing downtown. The greatest transformation of the park, however, grew out of the proposed demoli- tion of the original Kellum House built on the site in 1847.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Mangiaracina James Crisisinfluence.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE INFLUENCE OF THE 1830s NULLIFICATION CRISIS ON THE 1860s SECESSION CRISIS JAMES MANGIARACINA SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Amy Greenberg Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of History and Women’s Studies Thesis Supervisor Mike Milligan Senior Lecturer in History Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This thesis aims to connect the constitutional arguments for and against secession during the Nullification Crisis of 1832 with the constitutional arguments for and against secession during the Secession Crisis of 1860-1861. Prior to the Nullification Crisis, Vice President John C. Calhoun, who has historically been considered to be a leading proponent of secession, outlined his doctrine of nullification in 1828. This thesis argues that Calhoun’s doctrine was initially intended to preserve the Union. However, after increasingly high protective tariffs, the state delegates of the South Carolina Nullification Convention radicalized his version of nullification as expressed in the Ordinance of Nullification of 1832. In response to the Ordinance, President Andrew Jackson issued his Proclamation Regarding Nullification. In this document, Jackson vehemently opposed the notion of nullification and secession through various constitutional arguments. Next, this thesis will look at the Bluffton Movement of 1844 and the Nashville Convention of 1850. In the former, Robert Barnwell Rhett pushed for immediate nullification of the new protective Tariff of 1842 or secession. In this way, Rhett further removed Calhoun’s original intention of nullification and radicalized it.
    [Show full text]
  • Independence Trail Region, Known As the “Cradle of Texas Liberty,” Comprises a 28-County Area Stretching More Than 200 Miles from San Antonio to Galveston
    n the saga of Texas history, no era is more distinctive or accented by epic events than Texas’ struggle for independence and its years as a sovereign republic. During the early 1800s, Spain enacted policies to fend off the encroachment of European rivals into its New World territories west of Louisiana. I As a last-ditch defense of what’s now Texas, the Spanish Crown allowed immigrants from the U.S. to settle between the Trinity and Guadalupe rivers. The first settlers were the Old Three Hundred families who established Stephen F. Austin’s initial colony. Lured by land as cheap as four cents per acre, homesteaders came to Texas, first in a trickle, then a flood. In 1821, sovereignty shifted when Mexico won independence from Spain, but Anglo-American immigrants soon outnumbered Tejanos (Mexican-Texans). Gen. Antonio López de Santa Anna seized control of Mexico in 1833 and gripped the country with ironhanded rule. By 1835, the dictator tried to stop immigration to Texas, limit settlers’ weapons, impose high tariffs and abolish slavery — changes resisted by most Texans. Texas The Independence ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Trail ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ On March 2, 1836, after more than a year of conclaves, failed negotiations and a few armed conflicts, citizen delegates met at what’s now Washington-on-the-Brazos and declared Texas independent. They adopted a constitution and voted to raise an army under Gen. Sam Houston. TEXAS STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES Gen. Sam Houston THC The San Jacinto Monument towers over the battlefield where Texas forces defeated the Mexican Army. TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Four days later, the Alamo fell to Santa Anna.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Battleground: the Competing Legacies of San Jacinto by James E
    Beyond The Battleground: The Competing Legacies Of San Jacinto BY JAMES E. CRISP you were to ask the average Houstonian to describe the legacy of the Battle of I f San Jacinto, the answer might well be: “Look around you!” In other words, all that Houston is today – all of the political and economic development of Texas and the American Southwest through the last 171 years – is sometimes attributed to the outcome of the test of arms and courage on that pivotal day of April 21, 1836. But put aside for a moment the claim of the battle’s “decisiveness.” It is, after all, a very dubious proposition that a different outcome on that single day would have permanently put a stop to the expansion of the United States across the territories of northern Mexico, given the growing disparity in power and population between Mexico and the United States in the mid-nineteenth century. Rather than imagining what might have been had Santa Anna won the contest that day, think instead about another kind of “legacy.” How does this event from the distant past shape the way we think about ourselves and our world today? 6010845_UofH_Text.indd 12 10/13/10 6:12:34 AM Henry A. McArdle, Dawn at the Alamo, 1905. Courtesy Texas State Library & Archives Commission. 6010845_UofH_Text.indd 13 10/13/10 6:12:35 AM A legacy is by definition a powerful For the Texas story, San Jacinto the Mexican dictator. Trouillot is closer link between the past and the present. is doubly important, because as to the truth when he argues that it was Whatever the precise physical realities the anthropologist, Michel-Rolph actually the outcome of the Battle of of critical events such as the Battle of Trouillot, noted in Silencing the Past: San Jacinto which made possible the San Jacinto, it is the broader narratives Power and the Production of History, traditional Texan interpretation of in which we embed such events that the Mexican General Antonio Lopez the Alamo’s meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 7 Vocab
    Unit 7 Vocab •Cession: transfer of land from one country to another •Compromise of 1850: made California a state New Mexico and Utah territories ended slavery in Washington DC enacted Fugitive Slave Law in the south •Constitution of 1845: state constitution approved by a majority of Texans in 1845 •Executive branch: part of government that carries out the laws •Fugitive Slave Law: required American citizens to help find runaway slaves •Governor: highest ranking in state government •Judicial branch: part of government that interprets the laws •Legislative branch: part of government that makes laws •Legislature: government body that has the power to make or pass laws •Lt. governor: 2nd highest ranking in state government •Manifest Destiny: obvious choice for America to move west •Texas and New Mexico Act: created Texas' present day borders and gave Texas $10 million in return for giving up claims to New Mexico •Treaty of Guadalupe Hildago: ended war with Mexico included Mexican cession (transfer of California and future states of New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado to US) •War with Mexico: fought between 1846-1848 to settle boundary disputes The State of Texas!!! "... And that claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government entrusted to us." - John L. O' Sullivan, "Manifest Destiny" editorial, New York Morning News on December 27, 1845 Manifest Destiny was the idea of the U.S. MANIFEST DESTINY expanding west to the Pacific Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexation & Manifest Destiny
    Annexation & Manifest Destiny Research Annexation- the incorporating of a country or territory into another country or territory; one area joining another What benefits would Texas get by joining the U.S. rather than staying an independent Republic? U.S. was much smaller in 1844 (27 states) (Colored) Territory belonged to the U.S. (White) Land and that belonged to Mexico Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. 1. Protection of U.S. armed forces. The U.S. Army & Navy would be responsible for defending Texas against hostile Indians & Mexico. Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. 2. Become part of the U.S. postal system Mid-1840’s, the Postal System began charging rates essentially based on weight and whether a letter was going more than or fewer than 300 miles. In 1855, the rate structure was 3 cents for a letter weighing a half-ounce and traveling up to 3,000 miles, which included most of the United States and its territories. Letters going farther than 3,000 miles were charged postage of ten cents per sheet. Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. 3. Become part of the U.S. money system. Examples U.S. Money mid-1800s Texas ‘Redbacks’ Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. • By 1842, the Redbacks had become virtually worthless and had lost the power of legal tender. Once again Texans used bank notes from other American states instead of the Texas money. • A new series of currency, was issued in 1842. These were similar once again to treasury bills and little use was made of them by the general public.
    [Show full text]