DOCSLIB.ORG

IMPACT of CIVIL WAR on LATIN AMERICA By: Andrew Conticelli Period 6 LATIN AMERICA United States- Latin American Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IMPACT of CIVIL WAR on LATIN AMERICA By: Andrew Conticelli Period 6 LATIN AMERICA United States- Latin American Relations IMPACT OF CIVIL WAR ON LATIN AMERICA By: Andrew Conticelli Period 6 LATIN AMERICA United States- Latin American Relations • First the U.S.A wanted to protect and expand its economic and strategic interests in the region. • Inter America relations were expressed in universal, humanitarian terms, nonetheless the U.S. incorporated its distinct political, economic, and strategic interests. • U.S. leaders justified U.S. policy, by showing the region as helpless and in need of American guidance. • Reasons- save the people from the ravages of barbarism, and promote the creation of democratic republics based on American logic. START OF MEXICAN AMERICAN WAR • VIDEO CLIP- HTTP://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH? LIST=PL4FB761427E3E310F&FEATURE=PLAYER_DETAILPAGE&V=6SP-NEZ7I1O EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE CIVIL WAR • TEXAS ANNEXATION • MEXICAN AMERICAN WAR • WILMOT PROVISO • OSTEND MANIFESTO • FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT OF 1850 • COMPROMISE OF 1850 MANIFEST DESTINY -In the United States in the 19th century, Manifest Destiny was the widely held belief that American settlers were destined to expand across the continent. -This idea was used to justify getting into wars and acquiring territories. Texas Annexation • In 1825 President John Quincy Adams allowed the U.S. minister to Mexico, to negotiate the purchase of Texas. • 1830’s U.S. settlers came into Texas and found discontent with Mexican authorities. • 1836 settlers rebelled and defeated Mexico in a short war. • Texas remained an independent nation because of the debate on the extension of slavery. • Eventually Texas was annexed into the U.S. in 1845. Mexican- American War 1846-1848 • “The Invasion of Mexico” An armed conflict between the United States and Mexico. • Mexico did not want to give up Texas or cede any more land to America. • President Polk from America sought war to tract the lands north of the Rio Grande river. • Southern Democrats were intrigued by the idea of “Manifest Destiny and supported the war. • Whigs in the North opposed the war in fear of the rise of a “ Slave Power” Mexican Cession -The territories Mexico gave up to the U.S. in 1848 in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which ended the Mexican-American War (1846 – 1848). -California, Nevada, Utah, most of Arizona, half of New Mexico, about a quarter of Colorado, less than half of the southwest of Wyoming. How did the Mexican American War effect Mexico politically? • On November 10, 1845, President Polk authorized his secret representative John Slidell to pay $25 to $30 million in exchange for the Rio Grande border in Texas and Mexico’s provinces of Alta California and Santa Fe de Nuevo México. • Mexico was not able to decline or negotiate. In 1846, the Presidency changed hands four times, the war ministry six times, and the finance ministry sixteen times. • The General Mexican opinion and most political groups agreed that selling territories to the United States would destroy the national honor. Joaquín de Herrera and others who opposed direct conflict with the United States, were looked down on as traitors. WILMOT PROVISO • The Wilmot Proviso introduced by a congressman named David Wilmot, would have banned slavery in any territory to be acquired from Mexico in the Mexican war or in the future, including the area later known as the Mexican Cession. • Effort by the North to prevent slavery from spreading to newly acquired territories. • Passed by the House in 1846, but the Senate opposed the bill. • Passed again by the House in 1847, but once again the Senate was strongly against the bill. • The opposition of the bill by Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, was a big reason why the Wilmot Proviso never passed. -The OSTENDOstend Manifesto wasMANIFESTO an attempt by the United States to purchase Cuba from Spain and if there was resistance war would be necessary. -The Southerners wanted the island to become a possible new slave state. -In October of 1854, three Americans, the Minister to Spain Pierre Soulé met with the Minister to Great Britain James Buchanan and Minister to France John Y. Mason at Ostend, Belgium. These gentlemen composed a document on Cuba and called it the Ostend Manifesto, claiming the island belonged "naturally to the great family of the states...". -The Ostend Manifesto caused embarrassment to President Franklin Pierce's administration, after it became public. Spanish did not support slavery and wanted the sugar-cane industry to keep float because it was highly profitable. Many citizens in the North were angered that the South was willing to start a war with Spain to extend more slave holding states. FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT OF 1850 • The fugitive slave law or fugitive slave act was passed by the United States congress on September 18, 1850, as part of the compromise of 1850 between southern slave-holding interests and Northern free-soldiers • This act was very controversial because it increased the Northern fears of a "slave power conspiracy". • It declared that all runaway slaves were, upon capture, to be returned to their masters. • Free slaves returned- $5, Unfree slaves- $10 COMPROMISE OF 1850 • The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five bills passed in the U.S. in September, which defused a four-year confrontation between the slave states of the south and the free states of the north regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. • The compromise, drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky and brokered by Clay and democrat Stephen Douglas, avoided secession or civil war and reduced sectional conflict for four years. • California is admitted undivided as a free state, denying southern expansion to the pacific • Texas trades some territorial claims for debt relief • New Mexico and Deseret are denied statehood and become New Mexico territory and Utah territory with slavery left to popular sovereignty. North Gets South Gets California admitted as a free state No slavery restrictions in Utah or New Mexico territories Slave trade prohibited in Washington D.C. Slaveholding permitted in Washington D.C. Texas loses boundary dispute with New Mexico Texas gets $10 million Fugitive Slave Law THE END OF THE CIVIL WAR • The American Civil War came to an end with a victory for the Union on April 9, 1865. Over the next couple months, the Confederate forces surrendered in different parts of the country. • Soon after the war, President Lincoln being the commander in Chief of the Army and Navy issued the Emancipation Proclamation which declared the freedom of all slaves in the Confederate states of America. • It took over 100 years for blacks to have the same equal rights as whites. Three amendments to the U.S. Constitution helped blacks have the same opportunities as whites and have the same right to vote. • The South was in debt much more than the South because of the decision to print more money when the Cotton industry failed. PRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENT • Origin- This primary source document is a picture of the Battle of Buena Vista which was fought at Puerto de la Angostura, Coahuila on February 22-23, 1847. The battle was between Mexico and the United States. • Purpose- The purpose of this primary source document is to show the horrific warfare that went on during the Mexican-American War. The artist wanted to portray the Mexican Army as being enormous and the United State’s Army equal in size. • Value- The value of the primary source document is that I believe it is a good representation of how the battles happened during the Mexican-American War. Also, how the Americans had superior weapons compared to the Mexicans. • Limit- I believe the artist is a little bias by showing the American Army as more superior than the Mexican Army. For example, there are more dead bodies on the ground from the Mexican side than the American side. The picture may not show enough of how the Americans had a huge advantage with technology and strategy. Also, how the Mexicans were at a disadvantage but instead the picture depicts both sides of the battle as being equal. BIBLIOGRAPHY • "The U.S.-Mexican war (1846-1848)." The U.S.-Mexican war (1846-1848). N.P., N.D. Web. 07 Nov. 2013. • "The U.S.-Mexican war (1846-1848)." The U.S.-Mexican war (1846-1848). 07 Nov. 2013 <http:// www.Historyguy.Com/mexican-american_war.Html>. • Berliner Yvonne, Leppard Tom, Mamaux Alexis, Rogers. D Mark, Smith David, 2011. History of the Americas. PRINT. • Keen, Benjamin, Mark Wasserman, and Benjamin Keen. A History Of Latin America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1988. PRINT. • Stanchak, John e. Civil War. New York: Dorling Kindersley Pub., 2000. PRINT. • "The American Civil War Home Page." The American Civil War Home Page. N.P., N.D. Web. 07 Nov. 2013. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dispute Over the Annexation of Texas and Opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's Independence, the Nueces River Was R
    American Studies Mr. Carlson The Dispute over the Annexation of Texas and opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's independence, the Nueces River was recognized as the northern boundary of Mexico. Spain had fixed the Nueces as a border in 1816, and the United States ratified it in the 1819 treaty by which the United States had purchased Florida and renounced claims to Texas. Even following Mexico's independence from Spain, American and European cartographers fixed the Texas border at the Nueces. When Texas declared its independence, however, it claimed as its territory an additional 150 miles of land, to the Rio Grande. With the annexation of Texas in 1845, the United States adopted Texas's position and claimed the Rio Grande as the border. Mexico broke diplomatic relations with the United States and refused to recognize either the Texas annexation or the Rio Grande border. President James Polk sent a special envoy, John L. Slidell, to propose cancellation of Mexico's debt to United States citizens who had incurred damages during the Mexican Revolution, provided Mexico would formally recognize the Rio Grande boundary. Slidell was also authorized to offer the Mexican government up to $30 million for California and New Mexico. Between Slidell's arrival on December 6, 1845, and his departure in March 1846, the regime of President Jose Herrara was overthrown and a fervently nationalistic government under General Mariano Paredes seized power. Neither leader would speak to Slidell. When Paredes publicly reaffirmed Mexico's claim to all of Texas, Slidell left in a temper, convinced that Mexico should be "chastised." American Studies Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow of Napoleon Upon Lee at Gettysburg
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Military Park Seminar The Shadow of Napoleon upon Lee at Gettysburg Charles Teague Every general commanding an army hopes to win the next battle. Some will dream that they might accomplish a decisive victory, and in this Robert E. Lee was no different. By the late spring of 1863 he already had notable successes in battlefield trials. But now, over two years into a devastating war, he was looking to destroy the military force that would again oppose him, thereby assuring an end to the war to the benefit of the Confederate States of America. In the late spring of 1863 he embarked upon an audacious plan that necessitated a huge vulnerability: uncovering the capital city of Richmond. His speculation, which proved prescient, was that the Union army that lay between the two capitals would be directed to pursue and block him as he advanced north Robert E. Lee, 1865 (LOC) of the Potomac River. He would thereby draw it out of entrenched defensive positions held along the Rappahannock River and into the open, stretched out by marching. He expected that force to risk a battle against his Army of Northern Virginia, one that could bring a Federal defeat such that the cities of Philadelphia, Baltimore, or Washington might succumb, morale in the North to continue the war would plummet, and the South could achieve its true independence. One of Lee’s major generals would later explain that Lee told him in the march to battle of his goal to destroy the Union army.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing the Civil War and Reconstruction Center for Legislative Archives
    Reviewing the Civil War and Reconstruction Center for Legislative Archives Address of the Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society NAID 306639 From 1830 on, women organized politically to reform American society. The leading moral cause was abolishing slavery. “Sisters and Friends: As immortal souls, created by God to know and love him with all our hearts, and our neighbor as ourselves, we owe immediate obedience to his commands respecting the sinful system of Slavery, beneath which 2,500,000 of our Fellow-Immortals, children of the same country, are crushed, soul and body, in the extremity of degradation and agony.” July 13, 1836 The Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society was founded in 1832 as a female auxiliary to male abolition societies. The society created elaborate networks to print, distribute, and mail petitions against slavery. In conjunction with other female societies in major northern cities, they brought women to the forefront of politics. In 1836, an estimated 33,000 New England women signed petitions against the slave trade in the District of Columbia. The society declared this campaign an enormous success and vowed to leave, “no energy unemployed, no righteous means untried” in their ongoing fight to abolish slavery. www.archives.gov/legislative/resources Reviewing the Civil War and Reconstruction Center for Legislative Archives Judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court Case Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sanford NAID 301674 In 1857 the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African ancestry had no constitutional rights. “The question is simply this: Can a Negro whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such, become entitled to all the rights and privileges and immunities guaranteed to the citizen?..
    [Show full text]
  • The Coming Crisis, the 1850S 8Th Edition
    The Coming Crisis the 1850s I. American Communities A. Illinois Communities Debate Slavery 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debates II. America in 1850 A. Expansion and Growth 1. Territory 2. Population 3. South’s decline B. Politics, Culture, and National Identity 1. “American Renaissance” 2. Nathaniel Hawthorne a. The Scarlet Letter (1850) 3. Herman Melville a. Moby Dick (1851) 4. Harriet Beecher Stowe a. Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1851) III. Cracks in National Unity A. The Compromise of 1850 B. Political Parties Split over Slavery 1. Mexican War’s impact a. Slavery in the territories? 2. Second American Party System a. Whigs & Democrats b. Sectional division C. Congressional Divisions 1. Underlying issues 2. States’ Rights & Slavery a. John C. Calhoun b. States’ rights: nullification c. U.S. Constitution & slavery 3. Northern Fears of “The Slave Power” a. Sectional balance: slave v. free D. Two Communities, Two Perspectives 1. Territorial expansion & slavery 2. Basic rights & liberties 3. Sectional stereotypes E. Fugitive Slave Act 1. Underground Railroad 2. Effect of Slave Narratives a. Personal liberty laws 3. Provisions 4. Anthony Burns case 5. Frederick Douglass & Harriet Jacobs 6. Effect on the North D. The Election of 1852 1. National Party system threatened 2. Winfield Scott v. Franklin Pierce E. “Young America”: The Politics of Expansion 1. Pierce’s support 2. Filibusteros a. Caribbean & Central America 3. Cuba & Ostend Manifesto IV. The Crisis of the National Party System A. The Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1. Stephen A. Douglas 2. Popular sovereignty 3. Political miscalculation B. “Bleeding Kansas” 1. Proslavery: Missouri a. “Border ruffians” 2. Antislavery: New England a.
    [Show full text]
  • To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism Jacob A
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Honors College at WKU Projects 2010 To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism Jacob A. Glover Western Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Glover, Jacob A., "To Live and Die in Dixie: Robert E. Lee and Confederate Nationalism" (2010). Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects. Paper 267. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/267 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright by Jacob A. Glover 2010 ABSTRACT Robert E. Lee is undeniably one of the most revered figures in American history, and yet despite the adoration awarded to the man over the years, surprisingly little scholarly research has dedicated itself to an inquiry into his nationalistic leanings during the four most important years of his life—the Civil War. In fact, Lee was a dedicated Confederate nationalist during his time in service to the Confederacy, and he remained so for the rest of his life, even after his surrender at Appomattox and the taking of an oath to regain his United States citizenship. Lee identified strongly with a Southern view of antebellum events, and his time in the Confederate army hardened him to the notion that the only practical reason for waging the Civil War was the establishment of an independent Southern nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Ideas for a Destined Conflict
    Lesson Ideas for A Destined Conflict Excerpts from Curriculum Guide For Teaching Texas History Written by Yvonne Pittman, Educational Consultant Assisted by M. Elizabeth Appleby, Curator and Lisa A. Struthers, Library Director San Jacinto Museum of History This work was made possible through funding from: Fondren Foundation LyondellBasell Meadows Foundation Houston Endowment Inc. The Gordon A. Cain Foundation Elkins Foundation Union Pacific Foundation BNSF Railway Foundation San Jacinto Day Foundation The Dow Chemical Company H-E-B Tournament of Champions Written by Yvonne Pittman, Educational Consultant Assisted by M. Elizabeth Appleby, Curator and Lisa A. Struthers, Library Director San Jacinto Museum of History Copyright 2015 San Jacinto Museum of History Published by the San Jacinto Museum of History One Monument Circle La Porte, Texas 77571-9585 281-479-2421 www.sanjacinto-museum.org [email protected] August 17, 2015 Contents Lesson Plans Lesson Plan: Texas Annexation 1 Lesson Plan: Mexican War and Early Statehood 14 Strategy Descriptions and Graphic Organizers SDA Document Analysis 20 Walk-About Review 22 Historical Markers Activity 23 Propaganda Exercise 24 Introduction The goal of this guide is to enhance your students’ visit to the exhibit A Destined Conflict: The U.S. - Mexican War. The lessons were excerpted from Curriculum Guide for Teaching Texas History, which is available for download at http://www.sanjacinto- museum.org/Education/For_Teachers/. Lesson documents are in PDF format for ease of downloading, but Word versions are available to teachers on request to insure modifications are simple for classroom use. Related images are at https://sanjacinto- museum.smugmug.com/CurriculumGuide in the 4B Texas Annexation and 4C-Statehood sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneteenth” Comes Ployer and Free Laborer
    J UNETEENTH 92 C ELEBRATIONS UNETEENTH is the oldest celebration in the and the connection h eretofore existing be- nation to commemorate the end of slavery in tween them becomes that between em- J the United States. The word “Juneteenth” comes ployer and free laborer. from a colloquial pronunciation of “June 19th,” which With this announcement the last 250,000 slaves in is the date celebrations commemorate. the United States were effectively freed. Afterward In 1863 President Abraham Lincoln signed the many of the former slaves left Texas. As they moved to Emancipation Proclamation, offi - other states to fi nd family mem- cially freeing slaves. However, bers and start new lives, they car- word of the Proclamation did not ried news of the June 19th event reach many parts of the country with them. In subsequent decades right away, and instead the news former slaves and their descendants spread slowly from state to state. continued to commemorate June The slow spread of this important 19th and many even made pilgrim- news was i n part because the A mer- ages back to Galveston, Texas to ican Civil War had not yet ended. celebrate the event. However, in 1865 the Civil War Most of the celebrations ini- ended and Union Army soldiers tially took place in rural areas and began spreading the news of the included activities such as fi shing, war’s end and Lincoln’s Emanci- barbeques, and family reunions. pation Proclamation. Church grounds were also often On June 19, 1865, Major Gen- the sites for these celebrations. As eral Gordon Granger and U nion more and more African Americans Army soldiers arrived in Galves- improved their economic condi- ton, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Mangiaracina James Crisisinfluence.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE INFLUENCE OF THE 1830s NULLIFICATION CRISIS ON THE 1860s SECESSION CRISIS JAMES MANGIARACINA SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Amy Greenberg Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of History and Women’s Studies Thesis Supervisor Mike Milligan Senior Lecturer in History Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This thesis aims to connect the constitutional arguments for and against secession during the Nullification Crisis of 1832 with the constitutional arguments for and against secession during the Secession Crisis of 1860-1861. Prior to the Nullification Crisis, Vice President John C. Calhoun, who has historically been considered to be a leading proponent of secession, outlined his doctrine of nullification in 1828. This thesis argues that Calhoun’s doctrine was initially intended to preserve the Union. However, after increasingly high protective tariffs, the state delegates of the South Carolina Nullification Convention radicalized his version of nullification as expressed in the Ordinance of Nullification of 1832. In response to the Ordinance, President Andrew Jackson issued his Proclamation Regarding Nullification. In this document, Jackson vehemently opposed the notion of nullification and secession through various constitutional arguments. Next, this thesis will look at the Bluffton Movement of 1844 and the Nashville Convention of 1850. In the former, Robert Barnwell Rhett pushed for immediate nullification of the new protective Tariff of 1842 or secession. In this way, Rhett further removed Calhoun’s original intention of nullification and radicalized it.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text of the Ostend Manifesto
    THE OSTEND MANIFESTO Aix-la-Chapelle, October 15, 1854 Sir: The undersigned, in compliance with the wish expressed by the President in the several confidential dispatches you have addressed to us, respectively, to that effect, have met in conference, first at Ostend, in Belgium, on the 9th, 10th, and 11th instants, and then at Aix-la- Chapelle, in Prussia, on the days next following, up to the date hereof. There has been a full and unreserved interchange of views and sentiments between us, which we are most happy to inform you has resulted in a cordial coincidence of opinion on the grave and important subjects submitted to our consideration. We have arrived at the conclusion, and are thoroughly convinced, that an immediate and earnest effort ought to be made by the government of the United States to purchase Cuba from Spain at any price for which it can be obtained, not exceeding the sum of $ (this item was left blank). The proposal should, in our opinion, be made in such a manner as to be presented though the necessary diplomatic forms to the Supreme Constituent Cortes about to assemble. On this momentous question, in which the people both of Spain and the United States are so deeply interested, all our proceedings ought to be open, frank, and public. They should be of such a character as to challenge the approbation of the world. We firmly believe that, in the progress of human events, the time has arrived when the vital interests of Spain are as seriously involved in the sale, as those of the United States in the purchase of the island, and that the transaction will prove equally honorable to both nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Roads to Emancipation: Lincoln, the Law, and the Proclamation Dr
    Copyright © 2013 by the National Trust for Historic Preservation i Table of Contents Letter from Erin Carlson Mast, Executive Director, President Lincoln’s Cottage Letter from Martin R. Castro, Chairman of The United States Commission on Civil Rights About President Lincoln’s Cottage, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, and The United States Commission on Civil Rights Author Biographies Acknowledgements 1. A Good Sleep or a Bad Nightmare: Tossing and Turning Over the Memory of Emancipation Dr. David Blight……….…………………………………………………………….….1 2. Abraham Lincoln: Reluctant Emancipator? Dr. Michael Burlingame……………………………………………………………….…9 3. The Lessons of Emancipation in the Fight Against Modern Slavery Ambassador Luis CdeBaca………………………………….…………………………...15 4. Views of Emancipation through the Eyes of the Enslaved Dr. Spencer Crew…………………………………………….………………………..19 5. Lincoln’s “Paramount Object” Dr. Joseph R. Fornieri……………………….…………………..……………………..25 6. Four Roads to Emancipation: Lincoln, the Law, and the Proclamation Dr. Allen Carl Guelzo……………..……………………………….…………………..31 7. Emancipation and its Complex Legacy as the Work of Many Hands Dr. Chandra Manning…………………………………………………..……………...41 8. The Emancipation Proclamation at 150 Dr. Edna Greene Medford………………………………….……….…….……………48 9. Lincoln, Emancipation, and the New Birth of Freedom: On Remaining a Constitutional People Dr. Lucas E. Morel…………………………….…………………….……….………..53 10. Emancipation Moments Dr. Matthew Pinsker………………….……………………………….………….……59 11. “Knock[ing] the Bottom Out of Slavery” and Desegregation:
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th US History Civil War and Reconstruction Units
    8th US History Civil War and Reconstruction Units 1. Complete the first 4 weeks of work in order. The first week covers the Civil War. If you can answer the questions without completing all of the reading, you may do so, as you should have learned the majority of this content in class. Within the unit there are two video lessons, one about Harriet Tubman and another about the 54th Massachusetts. If you have access to your phone or the internet, watch the videos as they are assigned to complete the questions. 2. Weeks 2, 3, and 4 over lessons we have yet to cover in class, including about the period of time after the Civil War, called Reconstruction. You should use the textbook reading to complete the questions and assignments in this section. 3. Week 5 focuses on the STAAR practice unit. Please access the quizlet link on page 76, review the “US History at a glance” pages, and answer the practice problems using the “at a glance” information. 4. For online games, activities and extra practice check out: https://www.icivics.org/games 5. Khan Academy provides a free, online module for 8th Grade US History, including topic overviews and practice. Focus on The Civil War era (1844-1877) https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history WEEK 1 The Civil War 21.1 Introduction he cannon shells bursting over Fort Sumter ended months of confu­ sion. The nation was at war. The time had come to choose sides. TFor most whites in the South, the choice was clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition Chapter 18 Notes Renewing the Sectional Struggle
    The American Pageant th 15 Edition Chapter 18 notes Renewing the Sectional Struggle I. The Popular Sovereignty panache 1. Both parties (Democrats and The Whigs) had powerful support in the north and south. Politicians ignored the slavery issue for the most part. 2. Lewis Cass father of popular sovereignty was nominated for democrat president candidate. o Doctrine that stated that the sovereign people of a territory, should determine the status of slavery in the land themselves. o It was liked by the people because it was democratic and they could choose what was best for them. o Liked by Politicians because the slavery problem was now the people’s problem. o The only bad part was that that it might spread even more slavery. II. Political Triumphs for General Taylor 1. Zachary Taylor was nominated for Whig’s candidate; none of the candidates gave an opinion about slavery. o The free soil party was organized against slavery. “Free soil, free speech, free labor and free men”. It was run by Van Buren and he was their presidential candidate. 2. Taylor’s wartime popularity pulled the votes in his favor. o The free soil Van Buren diverted enough votes away from Cass to help Taylor. III. “Californy Gold” 1. The discovery of gold in California in early 1848 brought hordes of adventures. 2. A fortunate few “struck it rich” but many would have been better off staying at home. o The California gold rush attracted tens of thousands of people most of them criminals. It was a very dangerous place and there was lots of crime.
    [Show full text]