Unit 7 Vocab
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Dispute Over the Annexation of Texas and Opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's Independence, the Nueces River Was R
American Studies Mr. Carlson The Dispute over the Annexation of Texas and opposition to the Mexican War Prior to Texas's independence, the Nueces River was recognized as the northern boundary of Mexico. Spain had fixed the Nueces as a border in 1816, and the United States ratified it in the 1819 treaty by which the United States had purchased Florida and renounced claims to Texas. Even following Mexico's independence from Spain, American and European cartographers fixed the Texas border at the Nueces. When Texas declared its independence, however, it claimed as its territory an additional 150 miles of land, to the Rio Grande. With the annexation of Texas in 1845, the United States adopted Texas's position and claimed the Rio Grande as the border. Mexico broke diplomatic relations with the United States and refused to recognize either the Texas annexation or the Rio Grande border. President James Polk sent a special envoy, John L. Slidell, to propose cancellation of Mexico's debt to United States citizens who had incurred damages during the Mexican Revolution, provided Mexico would formally recognize the Rio Grande boundary. Slidell was also authorized to offer the Mexican government up to $30 million for California and New Mexico. Between Slidell's arrival on December 6, 1845, and his departure in March 1846, the regime of President Jose Herrara was overthrown and a fervently nationalistic government under General Mariano Paredes seized power. Neither leader would speak to Slidell. When Paredes publicly reaffirmed Mexico's claim to all of Texas, Slidell left in a temper, convinced that Mexico should be "chastised." American Studies Mr. -
Mexican American History Resources at the Briscoe Center for American History: a Bibliography
Mexican American History Resources at the Briscoe Center for American History: A Bibliography The Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin offers a wide variety of material for the study of Mexican American life, history, and culture in Texas. As with all ethnic groups, the study of Mexican Americans in Texas can be approached from many perspectives through the use of books, photographs, music, dissertations and theses, newspapers, the personal papers of individuals, and business and governmental records. This bibliography will familiarize researchers with many of the resources relating to Mexican Americans in Texas available at the Center for American History. For complete coverage in this area, the researcher should also consult the holdings of the Benson Latin American Collection, adjacent to the Center for American History. Compiled by John Wheat, 2001 Updated: 2010 2 Contents: General Works: p. 3 Spanish and Mexican Eras: p. 11 Republic and State of Texas (19th century): p. 32 Texas since 1900: p. 38 Biography / Autobiography: p. 47 Community and Regional History: p. 56 The Border: p. 71 Education: p. 83 Business, Professions, and Labor: p. 91 Politics, Suffrage, and Civil Rights: p. 112 Race Relations and Cultural Identity: p. 124 Immigration and Illegal Aliens: p. 133 Women’s History: p. 138 Folklore and Religion: p. 148 Juvenile Literature: p. 160 Music, Art, and Literature: p. 162 Language: p. 176 Spanish-language Newspapers: p. 180 Archives and Manuscripts: p. 182 Music and Sound Archives: p. 188 Photographic Archives: p. 190 Prints and Photographs Collection (PPC): p. 190 Indexes: p. -
Lesson Ideas for a Destined Conflict
Lesson Ideas for A Destined Conflict Excerpts from Curriculum Guide For Teaching Texas History Written by Yvonne Pittman, Educational Consultant Assisted by M. Elizabeth Appleby, Curator and Lisa A. Struthers, Library Director San Jacinto Museum of History This work was made possible through funding from: Fondren Foundation LyondellBasell Meadows Foundation Houston Endowment Inc. The Gordon A. Cain Foundation Elkins Foundation Union Pacific Foundation BNSF Railway Foundation San Jacinto Day Foundation The Dow Chemical Company H-E-B Tournament of Champions Written by Yvonne Pittman, Educational Consultant Assisted by M. Elizabeth Appleby, Curator and Lisa A. Struthers, Library Director San Jacinto Museum of History Copyright 2015 San Jacinto Museum of History Published by the San Jacinto Museum of History One Monument Circle La Porte, Texas 77571-9585 281-479-2421 www.sanjacinto-museum.org [email protected] August 17, 2015 Contents Lesson Plans Lesson Plan: Texas Annexation 1 Lesson Plan: Mexican War and Early Statehood 14 Strategy Descriptions and Graphic Organizers SDA Document Analysis 20 Walk-About Review 22 Historical Markers Activity 23 Propaganda Exercise 24 Introduction The goal of this guide is to enhance your students’ visit to the exhibit A Destined Conflict: The U.S. - Mexican War. The lessons were excerpted from Curriculum Guide for Teaching Texas History, which is available for download at http://www.sanjacinto- museum.org/Education/For_Teachers/. Lesson documents are in PDF format for ease of downloading, but Word versions are available to teachers on request to insure modifications are simple for classroom use. Related images are at https://sanjacinto- museum.smugmug.com/CurriculumGuide in the 4B Texas Annexation and 4C-Statehood sections. -
Juan Cortina Worksheet
Name Date Lone Star Legends: Unit 4 CHAPTER 13 Section 2 The Changing Face of Texas 13.2B Juan Cortina Pupil’s Edition, Mexican Folk Hero pp. 290–293 Known as the Robin Hood of the Rio Grande, Juan Nepomuceno Cortina (1824–1894) stands as a champion of Mexican civil rights in Texas. uan Cortina was born in Camargo in Tamaulipas, ranch, where he issued a proclama- JMexico, to an aristocratic family in 1824. His tion of rights for Mexican Texans. mother inherited a large cattle ranch in the Rio The proclamation called on the “sacred right of self- Grande Valley around Brownsville, where he moved preservation” and demanded justice for the oppressed as a young boy. and abused Mexican residents in the Rio Grande The War with Mexico In his early twenties, Cortina Valley. fought in the War with Mexico against the United Hot Pursuit In the following months, Cortina and States, serving as a cavalryman. After the war, he his army were pursued by forces, including the Texas moved to the north side of the Rio Grande, where he Rangers and a joint Mexican-Anglo force of militia- was charged at least twice by Texas authorities as a men. Cortina quickly defeated the latter group, cattle rustler. He was not arrested, though, and he though one of his closest lieutenants, Tomás Cabrera, remained popular with the Mexicans in the area. was captured by a town posse. Hero of the Poor After the signing of the Treaty of When the Texas Rangers got involved, they Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848), which established the quickly hanged Cabrera, fueling the fire that drove Texas boundary at the Rio Grande, Cortina rose in Cortina. -
Texas and the Civil
Texans Go to War Unit 8 Vocab Mexican Texans • The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo had promised all the benefits of United States citizenship to Mexican-Americans. But the federal government proved unable to keep its promises. In Texas, many Tejanos were denied the right to vote, lost their lands in court, and often found themselves persecuted, rather than protected, by officers of the law. Juan Cortina “The Robin Hood of the Rio Grande” • Juan Cortina was a Mexican Rancher who fought in Mexican-American War on the Mexican side. • After Mexico lost the war his land was divided in two. Texas authorities invalidated (taken away) many of his land claims. • "Flocks of vampires, in the guise of men," he wrote, robbed Mexicans "of their property, incarcerated, chased, murdered, and hunted them like wild beasts". •Juan Cortina believed that the rights of Tejanos were being violated throughout Texas. •Cortina carried out acts of violence against corrupt officials. His acts were called Cortina’s War. Juan •He raised a private army that defended “Tejano’s” Cortina against “Anglos” trying to take their land. • The Democrats were the dominant political party, and had Political very little competition from the Parties Whig party. -Texans would vote for southern democrats until the 1980’s! • Sam Houston, though he never joined the party, supported the Know-Nothing party which opposed immigration to the United States. Know-Nothing party flag Republican Party • 1854 Northerners created the Republican Party to stop the expansion of slavery. Southerners saw the Republican party as a threat and talk of secession increased. -
Chicano Resistance in the Southwest
Chicano Resistance In The Southwest Alfred Porras, Jr. INTRODUCTION There are two dimensions of racism, economic and cultural, as indicated by Christine E. Sleeter (1). The first dimension involves “violent conquest, accompanied by the construction of a belief system that the conquering group is culturally and intellectually superior to the group it has conquered.” The second dimension involves ongoing attempts by the colonizing society to consolidate and stabilize control over the land and people, and to incorporate the people into the labor force in subordinate positions. At the cultural level, the colonizing group proclaims the superiority of its social system. During times of rebellion or instability, the dominant society reinforces its dominance through violence, and through assault on the culture, language, religion, or moral fiber of the subordinate group. (2) Based on this definition of racism I begin my study of Chicano resistance in the “American” Southwest, since Sleeter’s first dimension is clearly present in the United States military takeover “with forcible measures to overturn Mexican land-ownership claims and to undermine Mexican culture, the Spanish language, and the Catholic religion."(3) This curriculum unit concerning conflict and resolution has the purpose to dispel the myth of the sleeping giant or the idea that the Mexican American people are unaware of their political potential. This curriculum unit will address three basic questions. What is conflict and resistance? What are the roots of conflict? What are the different modes of resistance? According to Robert J. Rosenbaum, the history of the Mexican-American War of the mid-1800's indicates that it was a quick war and no real resistance occurred during the take over of Mexican land and during the imposition of dominance by the U.S. -
Open Mangiaracina James Crisisinfluence.Pdf
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE INFLUENCE OF THE 1830s NULLIFICATION CRISIS ON THE 1860s SECESSION CRISIS JAMES MANGIARACINA SPRING 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Amy Greenberg Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of History and Women’s Studies Thesis Supervisor Mike Milligan Senior Lecturer in History Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This thesis aims to connect the constitutional arguments for and against secession during the Nullification Crisis of 1832 with the constitutional arguments for and against secession during the Secession Crisis of 1860-1861. Prior to the Nullification Crisis, Vice President John C. Calhoun, who has historically been considered to be a leading proponent of secession, outlined his doctrine of nullification in 1828. This thesis argues that Calhoun’s doctrine was initially intended to preserve the Union. However, after increasingly high protective tariffs, the state delegates of the South Carolina Nullification Convention radicalized his version of nullification as expressed in the Ordinance of Nullification of 1832. In response to the Ordinance, President Andrew Jackson issued his Proclamation Regarding Nullification. In this document, Jackson vehemently opposed the notion of nullification and secession through various constitutional arguments. Next, this thesis will look at the Bluffton Movement of 1844 and the Nashville Convention of 1850. In the former, Robert Barnwell Rhett pushed for immediate nullification of the new protective Tariff of 1842 or secession. In this way, Rhett further removed Calhoun’s original intention of nullification and radicalized it. -
Self-Guided Tour, Non-School Groups
1 MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY Self-guided tour, non-school groups August, 2012 We would like to welcome you to the Museum of South Texas History. We hope you will enjoy your time here and will learn something about the history and heritage of the area in which we live. I. The Butterfly/ Native Plants Garden: As you move toward the mesquite entry doors, we hope you notice the flowers on the west side of the walkway. They are examples of the flowers and plants native to this region that attract butterflies and birds. You pass several types of Lantana, as well as Butterfly Weed, Manzanita, Spring Mist Flower, and Vara Dulce. II. The Grand Lobby: The Grand Lobby, like the Museum building itself, echoes the “Spanish Colonial Revival” style that became widely popular in the early 20th Century. (Many original buildings in this style can still be found in the Valley.) Tile patterns in the floors, admission area, and Grand Stairway recall the heritage of Spain and Mexico. The Great Tower rises over 60 feet from the floor. Suspended from it by a hand-forged chain is a chandelier, hand-crafted of steel and copper. South Texas animal motifs decorate it. How many can you identify? There are more animals (8) worked into the metal archways across the hallway and in front of the store. Notice the metal railings, mounted in the recessed arches 12 feet above the floor. These came from the old Hidalgo County Courthouse in Edinburg. (It opened in 1910, and was torn down after the present courthouse opened in 1954.) The Grand Entry doors and the Reception Area/ Admission Area counter tops are made of mesquite wood. -
Annexation & Manifest Destiny
Annexation & Manifest Destiny Research Annexation- the incorporating of a country or territory into another country or territory; one area joining another What benefits would Texas get by joining the U.S. rather than staying an independent Republic? U.S. was much smaller in 1844 (27 states) (Colored) Territory belonged to the U.S. (White) Land and that belonged to Mexico Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. 1. Protection of U.S. armed forces. The U.S. Army & Navy would be responsible for defending Texas against hostile Indians & Mexico. Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. 2. Become part of the U.S. postal system Mid-1840’s, the Postal System began charging rates essentially based on weight and whether a letter was going more than or fewer than 300 miles. In 1855, the rate structure was 3 cents for a letter weighing a half-ounce and traveling up to 3,000 miles, which included most of the United States and its territories. Letters going farther than 3,000 miles were charged postage of ten cents per sheet. Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. 3. Become part of the U.S. money system. Examples U.S. Money mid-1800s Texas ‘Redbacks’ Benefits of Texas being annexed into the U.S. • By 1842, the Redbacks had become virtually worthless and had lost the power of legal tender. Once again Texans used bank notes from other American states instead of the Texas money. • A new series of currency, was issued in 1842. These were similar once again to treasury bills and little use was made of them by the general public. -
Mexican-Born Outlaw and Folk Hero After Killing a Texas Sheriff in Self-Defense, Cortez (Horse) and Yegua (Mare)
LATINOS Cortez, Gregorio GREGORIO CORTEZ Mexican-born outlaw and folk hero After killing a Texas sheriff in self-defense, Cortez (horse) and yegua (mare). Cortez had recently traded a became both a fugitive from justice and a symbol of yegua, and thus answered truthfully in Spanish when he resistance against the Anglo occupiers of land that denied trading a caballo. Hearing only the word no, Mor- had once belonged to Mexico. As a result, Cortez is a ris believed Cortez was lying and started to arrest him. In Latino folk hero whose exploits have been celebrated the ensuing struggle, Morris shot Romaldo in the mouth, in legends, ballads, and film. wounding him critically; Cortez shot and killed Morris in self-defense; and Choate escaped unharmed. Latino heritage: Mexican For the next ten days, Cortez crisscrossed roughly Born: June 22, 1875; near Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico five hundred miles of southern Texas, on foot and by Died: February 28, 1916; Anson, Texas horse, skillfully avoiding capture, even though he was Also known as: Gregorio Cortez Lira pursued by an estimated three hundred lawmen. When a Area of achievement: Crime posse of eight men attacked the house where he was hid- ing on June 14, Cortez shot and killed Gonzales County EARLY LIFE sheriff Robert M. Glover. Cortez finally was captured Gregorio Cortez Lira (greh-GOH-ree-oh cohr-TEHZ on June 22 in a sheep camp just north of the Rio Grande LEE-rah) was born on a ranch in the state of Tamauli- by one Texas Ranger and one former Texas Ranger, who pas, Mexico, just south of the Rio Grande. -
US History Mexican American War Performance Assessment
US History: Mexican-American War Was the US justified in going to war with Mexico in 1846? Directions: Read the documents, consider both perspectives and develop an argument in response to the question: Was the US justified in going to war with Mexico in 1846? Use evidence from the documents to support your argument. Remember what you have learned about reading and writing with documents. (*justified = right, did they have a good reason for the action taken) Background: Before 1835, Texas was a part of Mexico. In the Texas Revolution, the Texans defeated the Mexicans. Mexico did not accept the 1836 treaty that gave Texas rights to all of the land north of the Rio Grande (even though the Mexican General signed it). Texas was an independent country for 10 years before the US annexed (added) Texas to its territory. People in the US questioned whether adding Texas helped the US by adding more land and resources, or hurt it by expanding slavery and dividing the Northern and Southern states. Texans wanted to join the US, but Mexico did not want to lose Texas. After Texas was added to the US, Mexico and the US disagreed about the location of the border between them. Both thought the disputed area (see map below) was a part of their country. President Polk sent troops to this disputed area in March 1846. Mexicans saw this as an invasion and attacked the US troops. This was the start of the Mexican American War People disagreed about whether the US should have gone to war with Mexico and if the US unfairly started this war. -
CIVILCIVIL WARWAR Leader in Implementing and Promoting Heritage Tourism Efforts in Texas
The Texas Historical Commission, the state agency for historic preservation, TEXASTEXAS administers a variety of programs to IN THE preserve the archeological, historical IN THE and cultural resources of Texas. Texas Heritage Trails Program The Texas Historical Commission is a CIVILCIVIL WARWAR leader in implementing and promoting heritage tourism efforts in Texas. The Texas Heritage Trails Program is the agency’s top tourism initiative. It’s like a whole other country. Our Mission To protect and preserve the state’s historic and prehistoric resources for the use, STORIES OF SACRIFICE, education, enjoyment, and economic benefit of present and future generations. VALOR, AND HOPE Copyright © 2013, Texas Historical Commission TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Texas in theCivil War The United States was rife with conflict and controversy in the years leading to the Civil War. Perhaps nowhere was the struggle more complex than in Texas. Some Texans supported the Union, but were concerned about political attacks on Southern institutions. Texas had been part of the United States just 15 years when secessionists prevailed in a statewide election. Texas formally seceded on March 2, 1861 to become the seventh state in the new Confederacy. Gov. Sam Houston was against secession, and struggled with loyalties to both his nation and his adopted state. His firm belief in the Union cost him his office when he refused to take anMarch oath of allegiance to the new government. 2, 1861 Gov. Sam Houston refused to declare loyalty to the Confederacy and was removed from office by the Texas secession convention in March 1861. SAM HOUSTON PORTRAIT Tensions were high when the Civil War began, and Texans responded in impressive numbers.