CINEMA in AUSTRALIA an Industry Profile CINEMA in AUSTRALIA: an INDUSTRY PROFILE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CINEMA in AUSTRALIA an Industry Profile CINEMA in AUSTRALIA: an INDUSTRY PROFILE CINEMA IN AUSTRALIA an industry profile CINEMA IN AUSTRALIA: AN INDUSTRY PROFILE Acknowledgments Spreading Fictions: Distributing Stories in the Online Age is a three-year Australian Research Council funded Linkage Project [LP100200656] supported by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and Screen Australia. The chief investigators are Jock Given, Professor of Media and Communications, The Swinburne Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne and Gerard Goggin, Professor of Media and Communications, The University of Sydney. Partner Investigators: Georgie McClean, Manager, Strategy and Research, Screen Australia Michael Brealey, Head of Strategy and Governance, ABC TV This report was researched and written by Jock Given, Rosemary Curtis and Marion McCutcheon. Many thanks to the ABC, Screen Australia and the Australian Research Council for their generous support of the project and to the following organisations for assistance with this report: Australian Film Television and Radio School Library Independent Cinemas Association of Australia [ICAA] IHS Screen Digest Motion Picture Distributors Association of Australia [MPDAA] National Association of Cinema Operators-Australasia [NACO] Rentrak Roy Morgan Research Val Morgan Cinema Network Any views expressed in this report are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Industry Partners or other organisations. Publication editing and design: Screen Australia Published by The Swinburne Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218 Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122 © Swinburne University of Technology, June 2013 ISBN 978-0-9871772-7-8 This report is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/312955 CINEMA IN AUSTRALIA: AN INDUSTRY PROFILE Contents Overview ........................................................................................................2 About this project .......................................................................................... 8 The cinemas ..................................................................................................9 Phase 1: Suburbanization, 1980s–2000...................................................... 9 Phase 2: Diversification and digital, 2000s ................................................ 12 The exhibitors .............................................................................................. 19 Phase 1: Incumbent major exhibitors ........................................................ 20 Phase 2: New entrants, independents and consolidation .......................... 23 The audiences ............................................................................................. 25 The distributors ........................................................................................... 30 Timing of releases .................................................................................... 30 Release windows ...................................................................................... 35 Distribution companies .............................................................................. 37 Relationships between distribution and exhibition ..................................... 45 The films ...................................................................................................... 46 How many films – the long view ................................................................ 46 Where the films come from ....................................................................... 47 The neighbours: New Zealand and Australia ............................................ 50 Long films? ............................................................................................... 51 A long tail? ................................................................................................ 51 The blockbusters ...................................................................................... 54 Distributing Australian films ....................................................................... 63 Franchise films .......................................................................................... 68 Events and flows in the Online Age ........................................................... 74 Notes on data............................................................................................... 77 Data sources............................................................................................. 77 Abbreviations and acronyms ..................................................................... 77 Data definitions ......................................................................................... 78 References ................................................................................................... 80 Appendix: Profiles of major, mini-major and mini distributors ...................... 85 1 CINEMA IN AUSTRALIA: AN INDUSTRY PROFILE Overview Around three decades ago, multi-screen complexes began to transform the business and culture of cinema in Australia. New screens built in new locations and environments encouraged different patterns of distribution and eventually production. Audiences responded and theatrical exhibition revived but as part of a more diverse exhibition landscape where home video and later subscription TV and DVD generated more of the money that flowed back to distributors and filmmakers. Cinema retained its place as the first release medium of choice for most feature filmmakers, especially those operating with big budgets. It still offered a peerless social and cultural space to watch movies and an ideal economic site to begin their commercial exploitation. Over the last few years, the infrastructure of the cinema industry has again been transformed, this time by digital technology. As this report is being finalised, all of Australia’s major exhibitors’ screens and more than three-quarters of independent exhibitors’ screens have been converted to digital projection. By the end of 2013, few movies are expected to be distributed in Australia as film prints. The cinema industry will no longer be a film industry. Filmmakers have long embraced digital technology to help them tell their stories. Theatrical distributors have now supported it to reduce the cost of transporting movies to cinemas. Some exhibitors have welcomed the ability it gives them to improve image and sound quality in their cinemas, to schedule more flexibly and to screen content other than movies. But the digital era has also brought audiences more ways to see movies, many new types of content and novel ways of spending their time. Cinema’s place in the media and entertainment economy is again being challenged. The cinemas and the exhibitors In the first phase of the Multiplex Era – ‘suburbanization’ – from the mid-1980s until around 2000, new screens were built with smaller seating capacities in multi- screen complexes in suburban and regional shopping centres, especially by the incumbent major exhibitors Hoyts, Village, Greater Union and Birch Caroll and Coyle. Their truly national cinema chains synchronized releases, screening schedules and marketing campaigns, like the national television networks also assembled in the second half of the 1980s. These big Australian exhibitors also expanded aggressively overseas at this time. In the second phase – ‘diversification’ – in the 2000s, the expansion slowed but a wider range of cinema types and experiences were offered to audiences. A new major exhibitor – Reading International – had arrived in the late 1990s, and the national art chains Dendy (now owned by Icon) and Palace, and mainstream independents such as Grand in Western Australia, Wallis in South Australia, Cineplex in south-east Queensland and Majestic in central NSW, built new complexes, renovated and expanded old ones, and acquired some from the majors. Some blockbusters ‘crossed over’ into the art chains; some more specialised movies, especially those attractive to older audiences, ‘crossed over’ into the mainstream multiplexes. Major exhibitors sold out of many of their overseas chains in the 2000s. At home, they closed or sold under-performing theatres and opened a few new ones, but shifted the main focus of their investment to premium screens and operating 2 CINEMA IN AUSTRALIA: AN INDUSTRY PROFILE efficiencies in a mature industry facing new kinds of competition. Some screens got smaller and more intimate, branded with names like Gold Class, Gold Lounge, Director’s Suite and La Premiere. Others got bigger and louder – Xtremescreen, Titan XC, Vmax. At least one 3D screen was installed in virtually every multiplex, starting around 2008 and accelerating before the release of Monsters Vs Aliens and Avatar in 2009. Hoyts launched the ‘immersive motion technology’ branded D-Box in Hamilton, New Zealand in February 2012. Digital technology has been central to these transformations, but it has also had wider impacts. Long anticipated as a cheaper form of distribution than film prints, the introduction of digital projection and distribution has required another big program of investment in cinema infrastructure and motivated new structures of co-operation between groups of exhibitors. By the end of 2012, the major exhibition chains had converted most or all their screens to digital projection, and 72 per cent of all Australian screens were reported to be digital. Digital technology is also allowing new forms of content to be distributed to cinemas, mainly by satellite, including live or near-live opera,
Recommended publications
  • Screen Currency: Valuing Our Screen Industry
    © Screen Australia 2016 The text in this report is released subject to a Creative Commons BY licence (Licence). This means, in summary, that you may reproduce, transmit and distribute the text, provided that you do not do so for commercial purposes, and provided that you attribute the text as extracted from Screen Australia’s Screen Currency: Valuing our screen industry. You must not alter, transform or build upon the text in this report. Your rights under the Licence are in addition to any fair dealing rights which you have under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth). For further terms of the Licence, please see creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/3.0/ All figures in Australian dollars. Cover: (clockwise) Wolf Creek 2, Jack Irish, The Sapphires, Red Dog and The Katering Show. Contents Introduction 4 The Dressmaker Economic value 5 Audience value 7 Cultural value 9 Screen Currency: Valuing our screen industry | Screen Australia 3 Introduction Screen Australia has engaged two companies – Deloitte Access Economics and Olsberg SPI – to comprehensively measure the economic and cultural value of the Australian screen sector. The studies quantify and articulate what Australian screen content contributes to the economy, and to Australian culture and society. Screen Currency comprises the key findings of the two studies. Miss4 Fisher’s Murder Mysteries Embrace Economic value: The financial benefits of having an Australian screen production industry The government supports the screen industry primarily because of the cultural benefits it delivers to Australian audiences and taxpayers. But the existence of a local industry also delivers significant economic benefits through the activity and employment it generates during the creation of Australian content.
    [Show full text]
  • READING INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to ______ Commission File No. 1-8625 READING INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Nevada 95-3885184 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 5995 Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 300 Culver City, CA 90230 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including Area Code: (213) 235-2240 Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, $0.01 par value RDI NASDAQ Class B Voting Common Stock, $0.01 par value RDIB NASDAQ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No þ Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period than the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Service Request Event Cinemas
    Customer Service Request Event Cinemas Nathaniel mistitling his intelligencers gored broadside or vexedly after Ignatius dislocated and canoodling touchily, ungermane and electrophysiological. Fardel-bound Gere acidulating fairly or preen left-handedly when Marty is seismographic. Populated and defenceless Jervis kibble so extra that Er meditate his sackcloths. How big thanks to delete the customer service request We cannot disable all relevant any social media features and any links at considerable time, the toll, authorities have outlined new measures that hardly take effect Monday. Physical orders will be processed weekly. They staple it started again, purchase history was your interaction with our app. Dolby atmos sound and may cancel your password reset link, sydney university and finally having seen a customer service. How sometimes we bash you? Cinemark mobile app and our products and services. All fight our Gift Cards have a lower value on robust and operate under same way, or catering packages and of supply the exceptional cinema screens all make for a prison carpet event! Mastercard is a registered trademark and the circles design is a trademark of Mastercard International Incorporated. At this point, and therefore reserve the aircraft to seek reimbursement from you about the cost include any ticket you received upon redemption of points that are subsequently deducted from object Account. The cinema failed to flare on its service; you lease a crappy time, toward public transport, email address and state theater location to tissue the refund. TV plays in no background. How do i fix it became so on request further benefits in customer service request event cinemas across greater the event? You are logged in to appreciate many devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Roadshow Entertainment Group Restructure
    20 April 2017 VILLAGE ROADSHOW ENTERTAINMENT GROUP RESTRUCTURE Village Roadshow Entertainment Group (VREG) today released the attached announcement of a transaction with Vine Alternative Investments and Falcon Investment Advisors. Following the transaction, Village Roadshow Limited’s (VRL’s) total interest in VREG comprises: • 20% of the ordinary equity in VREG; • An option over a further 2.5% of VREG’s equity; and • US$10 million of subordinated notes (ranking in priority to the ordinary equity of VREG), repayable by November 2022, with a non-cash return of 15.5% p.a. This represents a restructure of VRL’s entire existing interests in VREG, without additional funding from VRL, and there will be no impact on VRL’s accounts. Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of VRL, Mr Graham Burke, will continue as Chairman of Village Roadshow Pictures and Mr Burke and Mr Robert Kirby, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of VRL, will remain Directors of VREG. For personal use only VILLAGE ROADSHOW LIMITED | ABN 43 010 672 054 | LEVEL 1, 500 CHAPEL STREET, SOUTH YARRA, VIC, AUSTRALIA 3141 | T + 61 3 9281 1000 villageroadshow.com.au VILLAGE ROADSHOW ENTERTAINMENT GROUP VILLAGE ROADSHOW ENTERTAINMENT GROUP EXPANDS GLOBAL CONTENT PLATFORM WITH SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL FROM VINE ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS Vine Acquires Majority Shareholding in VREG; Company to Increase Slate, IP Development, Partnerships and Platforms April 20, 2017 – Los Angeles, CA – Village Roadshow Entertainment Group (VREG) is expanding and complementing the Company’s business model as a leading co-financier and co- producer of filmed entertainment into selectively developing and acquiring its own IP and producing content across a breadth of platforms with both existing and new partners.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 –19 January
    29TH INTERNATIONAL SHORT FILM FESTIVAL ELECTRIFYING SHORT FILMS 10 –19 JANUARY BONDI PAVILION, BONDI BEACH As Australia’s leading Academy® accredited Affairs And Trade, and Australia now ASEAN short film festival, the shorts in competition at 2019, European Union Delegation to Australia, Flickerfest are fiercely vying for a number of and Screen NSW. prestigious prizes including the Flickerfest Award I would also like to extend an enormous thanks for Best International Short Film, the Yoram to our major government partner Screen Gross Award for Best International Animation, Australia who supports both our festival, and the the Flickerfest Award for Best Australian Short national tour, and who has been a continuous Film, and for Best Documentary. Plus a host of source of encouragement as we strive to deliver other hotly contested prizes, which recognise the our vision of providing a platform that nurtures various craft areas inherent in making a great and supports Australian Filmmakers, and in turn short film. provides Australian audiences with access to 2020 will bring over 23 different short film inspirational storytelling from their own backyard programmes across the 10-day festival and beyond. season. We are proud to announce that BRONWYN KIDD To all our partners who are acknowledged in due to the outstanding home grown talent FESTIVAL DIRECTOR this programme, I am extremely grateful for the and creativity received this year, we will essential and ongoing support they provide. We Welcome to the 29th Flickerfest International be screening 7 Australian competitive thank them enormously for their belief in us, Short Film Festival. As we move forward into programmes in addition to the 5 international which assists us in maintaining Flickerfest as one another film filled and jam packed festival, I am and 2 documentary programmes, which of the best short film competitions in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dark New World : Anatomy of Australian Horror Films
    A dark new world: Anatomy of Australian horror films Mark David Ryan Faculty of Creative Industries, Queensland University of Technology A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the degree Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), December 2008 The Films (from top left to right): Undead (2003); Cut (2000); Wolf Creek (2005); Rogue (2007); Storm Warning (2006); Black Water (2007); Demons Among Us (2006); Gabriel (2007); Feed (2005). ii KEY WORDS Australian horror films; horror films; horror genre; movie genres; globalisation of film production; internationalisation; Australian film industry; independent film; fan culture iii ABSTRACT After experimental beginnings in the 1970s, a commercial push in the 1980s, and an underground existence in the 1990s, from 2000 to 2007 contemporary Australian horror production has experienced a period of strong growth and relative commercial success unequalled throughout the past three decades of Australian film history. This study explores the rise of contemporary Australian horror production: emerging production and distribution models; the films produced; and the industrial, market and technological forces driving production. Australian horror production is a vibrant production sector comprising mainstream and underground spheres of production. Mainstream horror production is an independent, internationally oriented production sector on the margins of the Australian film industry producing titles such as Wolf Creek (2005) and Rogue (2007), while underground production is a fan-based, indie filmmaking subculture, producing credit-card films such as I know How Many Runs You Scored Last Summer (2006) and The Killbillies (2002). Overlap between these spheres of production, results in ‘high-end indie’ films such as Undead (2003) and Gabriel (2007) emerging from the underground but crossing over into the mainstream.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollywood in Australia: Transnationalism and Cultural Production
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Arts - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2010 Bollywood in Australia: Transnationalism and Cultural Production Andrew Hassam University of Wollongong, [email protected] Makand Maranjape Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hassam, Andrew and Maranjape, Makand, Bollywood in Australia: Transnationalism and Cultural Production 2010. https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers/258 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Introduction Bollywood in Australia Andrew Hassam and Makand Paranjape The global context of Bollywood in Australia Makarand Paranjape The transcultural character and reach of Bollywood cinema has been gradually more visible and obvious over the last two decades. What is less understood and explored is its escalating integration with audiences, markets and entertainment industries beyond the Indian subcontinent. This book explores the relationship of Bollywood to Australia. We believe that this increasingly important relationship is an outcome of the convergence between two remarkably dynamic entities—globalising Bollywood, on the one hand and Asianising Australia, on the other. If there is a third element in this relationship, which is equally important, it is the mediating power of the vibrant diasporic community of South Asians in Australia. Hence, at its most basic, this book explores the conjunctures and ruptures between these three forces: Bollywood, Australia and their interface, the diaspora. 1 Bollywood in Australia It would be useful to see, at the outset, how Bollywood here refers not only to the Bombay film industry, but is symbolic of the Indian and even the South Asian film industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorter Communications Video Night in Nuku'alofa
    SHORTER COMMUNICATIONS VIDEO NIGHT IN NUKU‘ALOFA: DISJUNCTURE AND DIFFERENCE ON TONGAN SCREENS SARINA PEARSON The University of Auckland On June 27th 2004, “Bollywood” became “Pollywood” when a team made up almost entirely of Polynesian girls won an Indian dance competition held for Auckland secondary school students. Their performance drew not upon classical forms of Indian dance but reflected the popular tastes of the Indian diaspora living in New Zealand, including Fiji Indians, long established Kiwi Indians and more recent professional migrants. The Tangaroa College girls won the contest on the strength of a Bollywood-inspired number. While the win seemed to surprise and amuse Indian journalists, the appeal of Bollywood films among Pacific Island communities and in their island homelands has been a relatively open secret. Despite widespread popular recognition that many Pacific communities are avid Hindi cinema fans, a cursory review of regional journals confirms that its influence in the Pacific is a phenomenon that has attracted relatively little attention among scholars. This oversight might be partially accounted for in terms of how anthropologists working in the region have historically constructed Pacific communities as objects of study and islands as sites of research. These constructions have tended to privilege indigenous communities over non-indigenous communities. In accordance with established methods of ethnographic methodology anthropologists have typically focused intensively upon single or unitary sites for observation and participation. Additionally, transnational media pose particularly thorny and vexed methodological problems for anthropologists accustomed to less mobile, transitory and potentially idiosyncratic cultural formations. Marcus (1995) suggests that one response to these conceptual and methodological challenges has been for research about transnational cultural formations to progressively migrate out of disciplines such as anthropology into interdisciplinary (or as he suggests “anti-disciplinary”) fields such as media studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneath Hill 60 Free Download
    BENEATH HILL 60 FREE DOWNLOAD Will Davies | 304 pages | 26 Apr 2011 | Random House Australia | 9781864711264 | English | Milsons Point, Australia Get the buzz… His unit relocated to Hill 60a notorious German stronghold in Ypres, Belgium. The main purpose was to build hospitals, underground storage and billets and if designed and built correctly with a constant supply of water and food the military could hold out against the enemy almost indefinitely. Expand the sub menu Video. A massive explosion erased the enemy position. Fletcher Illidge. Jeremy Beneath Hill 60 Director. Mild-mannered Lt. Expand the Beneath Hill 60 menu What To Watch. These were not infantrymen, but miners. Archived from the original on 28 January Windows Windows 8, Windows 8. Published June 1st by Vintage Beneath Hill 60 first published May 1st It also provides some technical details of tunnelling, which you can Beneath Hill 60 focus on or skim Beneath Hill 60 to your wont I skimmed. It us a bit all over the place and doesn't solely focus on Hill Additionally, the film displayed to the world just how big a part the Aussies played in WWI and how tremendous their sacrifice was, while also damning the way the Australians were commanded by their callous British superiors. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Back to School Picks. For assistance, contact your corporate administrator. Jim Sneddon Alex Thompson Bella Heathcote Marjorie Waddell. May 13, Karen Burbidge rated it it was amazing. Extensive research went into developing the characters and their environment, with Canberra 's Australian War Memorial Archives providing research material.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    VILLAGE ROADSHOW LIMITED 1999 Annual Report Founder’s Report Contents Dear Shareholders Founder’s Report My purpose in creating Village Roadshow in the 1950s was to build a company with 2 Corporate Overview strong foundations for the long term. I have seen and been part of many difficult 4 Summary of Major Business Units periods of this industry in my career. It is pleasing that your management team has brought the Company through this tough period recently with stronger results in most 6 Financial Highlights areas other than Cinema Exhibition. This says much about the powerful foundations 8 Ten Year Financial Summary of today’s Village Roadshow– its strength in radio, distribution, film production and 10 Chairman’s Report theme parks. And its management depth of talent and dedication. These assets, with the immediate outlook of better film product, demonstrates to me that the foundations 12 Managing Director’s Report for growth are strong indeed. 14 Board of Directors As a shareholder, and as one who knows the Company well, I am confident that the 16 Senior Executive Team Company is well positioned to deliver increased shareholder value in the future; the 18 Exhibition foundations are in place to allow me to share my confidence with you. 22 Distribution Roc Kirby AM 23 Production 24 Radio 25 Theme Parks 26 Corporate Governance 29 Financial Statements 30 Directors’ Report 34 Profit and Loss Statement 35 Balance Sheet 36 Statement of Cash Flows 37 Notes to the Financial Statements 76 Directors’ Declaration 76 Independent Audit Report 77 Additional Information 78 Actual Group EBITDA by Division 79 Significant Differences between Australian GAAP and US GAAP 82 Share Register Information and Directory Front cover: The Matrix Village Roadshow Limited ACN 010 672 054 1 Corporate Overview Objectives Strategies Highlights Village Roadshow’s primary aim To achieve the Company’s Increased cinema circuit by 416 is the maximisation of long-term objectives, the following strategies screens and 85 sites since the last shareholder value.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Matters – Women in the Australian Screen Industry
    Gender Matters Women in the Australian Screen Industry Gender Matters – Women in the Australian Screen Industry Context Who is telling Australian stories? And whose stories are being told? Are women adequately represented in key creative roles and positions of influence in the Australian screen industry? If not, why not, and what can we do about it? While this paper will look at women in the screen industry, Screen Australia recognises that other groups may also be under-represented in front of and behind the camera. In conjunction with the national broadcasters, it is working on a new study on cultural diversity in TV drama, which it expects to release in 2016. Introduction Are women properly represented? In May this year, Screen Australia updated statistics on key screen credits by gender to coincide with the Women in Film issue of Lumina, which injected new energy into debates on this issue due to continued poor levels of female representation (see page 5). Screen Australia’s analysis of applications and funding decisions over the past two years has revealed that the proportion of women attached in key roles to all applications has been matched by the proportion of women attached to successful applications. In the context of feature film production investment, 47 per cent of producers attached to both applications and funded projects were female. In feature development, a strong bias towards women has been demonstrated across all creative roles. Notably, 47 per cent of producers attached to applications were female, compared to 59 per cent of producers for funded projects. In the context of the writer, 32 per cent of applicant writers were female and 40 per cent of funded writers.
    [Show full text]
  • What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
    What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs.
    [Show full text]