DOCSLIB.ORG

Tfl Traffic Modelling Guidelines Version 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tfl Traffic Modelling Guidelines Version 3 Traffic Modelling Guidelines TfL Traffic Manager and Network Performance Best Practice Version 3.0 MAYOR OF LONDON Edited by Dr James Smith & Robert Blewitt © Transport for London, September 2010 All rights reserved. Reproduction permitted for research, private study and internal circulation within an organisation. Extracts may be reproduced provided the source is acknowledged. Disclaimer This publication is intended to provide accurate information. However, TfL and the authors accept no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions or for any damage or loss arising from use of the information provided. Foreword 3 Foreword The capacity of London’s traffic network (both road and footway) is coming under increasing pressure and maintaining the smooth operation of this network is a challenging task. A primary goal of the TfL Traffic Manager is to deliver journey time reliability and it is essential that traffic schemes are developed to a high quality and their impacts on the network are well understood and mitigated with journey time reliability as the ultimate outcome. Traffic modelling plays an increasingly vital role in this objective and these guidelines provide invaluable support. They draw upon expertise from across the industry and form a comprehensive source of best practice. It is TfL’s remit to ensure that the effects of all planned interventions on the road network are thoroughly understood before they are implemented. These guidelines are fundamental in achieving this requirement. Alan Bristow TfL Streets Traffic Director Traffic Manager for TfL 4 Traffic Modelling Guidelines Acknowledgements The editors would like to thank the following individuals for their support during the creation of this document: John Green Operational Modelling, Traffic Directorate Kamran Hussain Operational Modelling, Traffic Directorate Ioannis Ioannidis Operational Modelling, Traffic Directorate Cyrus Kibuuka Operational Modelling, Traffic Directorate Vladimir Vorotović Operational Modelling, Traffic Directorate Glynn Barton Network Performance, Traffic Directorate Tony Earl Network Performance, Traffic Directorate Brett Little Network Performance, Traffic Directorate Jason Robinson Network Performance, Traffic Directorate Mangal Singh Network Performance, Traffic Directorate Ajay Tailor Network Performance, Traffic Directorate Neil Adams Traffic Infrastructure, Traffic Directorate Tim Piper Traffic Infrastructure, Traffic Directorate Nicola Cheetham Operations Directorate Steve Cotton Network Assurance Julie Dye Borough Projects and Programme Lorraine Johnson Roads Directorate John Lee Modal Policy Cycling Chris Lines Better Routes and Places Directorate Steve Miller Group Transport Planning and Policy Pam Turton Enforcement and Policing James Binning TRL Ltd David Carrignon Dessau Inc Nick Cottman Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd Samya Ghosh AECOM Ltd Matt Hall Atkins Global Ltd Derek Hooper MWH Australia Pty Ltd Dr Klaus Nökel PTV AG Contents 5 Contents Foreword 3 Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 12 PART A – MODELLING CONSIDERATIONS 15 1 Introduction 17 2 Background to Traffic Signal Scheme Modelling in London 19 2.1 Introduction 19 2.2 Legislative Responsibilities 20 2.2.1 Applying the NMD in TfL 20 2.2.2 Modelling Journey Time Reliability 21 2.3 Transport Modelling Hierarchy 22 2.3.1 Strategic 23 2.3.2 Cordon Area 23 2.3.3 Micro-simulation 23 2.3.4 Local Area 24 2.3.5 Operational 24 2.3.6 Model Integration 24 2.4 Modelling Standards 25 2.5 Fit for Purpose Modelling 25 2.6 Modelling Expertise 26 2.7 Site Visit and Data Collection 26 2.8 Assessing Future Scenarios 26 2.9 Modelling Boundary 27 2.10 Presentation of Modelling Results 27 2.11 Delivery of Traffic Modelling 28 3 Scheme Considerations 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Overarching Objectives 29 3.3 Interested Parties 29 3.4 Scheme Design 30 3.4.1 Junction Layout 30 3.4.2 Fixed Time and Adaptive Control 30 3.4.3 Traffic Signal Timing Plans 31 3.4.4 Contingency Signal Timings 31 3.4.5 24/7 Operation 31 3.4.6 Scheme Safety 32 4 General Traffic Considerations 33 4.1 Introduction 33 4.2 Route Choice for Local Modelling 33 6 Traffic Modelling Guidelines 4.3 When to move from Local Modelling to Strategic Modelling 34 5 Public Transport Considerations 35 5.1 Introduction 35 5.2 Assessment of Buses 35 5.3 Bus Stops 36 5.4 Bus Lanes & Pre-Signals 36 5.5 Bus Priority (BP) 37 6 Pedestrian Considerations 38 6.1 Introduction 38 6.2 Pedestrian Demand and Desire Lines 39 6.3 Isolated Pedestrian Crossings 39 6.4 Isolated Signalised Pedestrian Crossing Facilities 40 6.5 Pedestrian Facilities at Signalised Junctions 40 6.5.1 Full Pedestrian 41 6.5.2 Parallel Pedestrian 41 7 Cyclist Considerations 42 7.1 Introduction 42 7.2 Junction Design 42 7.3 Inclusion of Cyclists 43 8 Air Pollution Impacts 44 8.1 Introduction 44 8.2 TfL Objectives 45 9 Which Traffic Modelling Software? Why? 47 9.1 Introduction 47 9.2 Deterministic Models for Traffic Signal Control 48 9.2.1 Isolated Signalised Intersections 48 9.2.2 Isolated Non-Signalised Intersections 49 9.2.3 Networks 49 9.3 Micro-simulation Models 50 9.4 Assignment Models 51 PART B – MODELLING GUIDANCE 53 1 Introduction 55 2 Modelling Principles 57 2.1 Model Definitions 57 2.1.1 Model Scope 58 2.1.2 Base Model 58 2.1.3 Proposed Model 58 2.2 Model Auditing Process 59 2.2.1 Use of Approved TfL Models 60 2.3 Network Familiarisation 61 2.3.1 Model Boundary 61 2.3.2 Site Paperwork 62 2.3.3 Online Data Sources 62 2.4 Data Acquisition 63 Contents 7 2.4.1 Typical Traffic Conditions 63 2.4.2 Site Visits 64 2.4.3 Traffic Count Surveys 65 2.4.3.1 Passenger Car Unit 66 2.4.4 Private Transport Surveys 67 2.4.4.1 Cruise Times 67 2.4.4.2 Journey Times 68 2.4.4.3 Queue Lengths 69 2.4.5 Flared Approaches 69 2.4.6 Non-Green and Flashing Amber 69 2.4.7 Saturation Flow 70 2.4.7.1 Use of Calculation Formula RR67 71 2.4.8 Degree of Saturation 72 2.4.8.1 Underutilised Green Time 72 2.4.9 Signal Timings 75 2.4.9.1 UTC Junctions 75 2.4.9.2 Non-UTC Junctions 76 2.4.9.3 Demand-Dependent Stages 77 2.4.9.4 Pedestrian Facilities 77 2.4.10 Public Transport Surveys 78 2.4.10.1 Bus Route Frequencies 78 2.4.10.2 Bus Journey Times 78 2.4.10.3 Bus Stop Usage and Dwell Times 78 2.4.10.4 Bus Lane Usage 79 2.5 Model Development 79 2.5.1 Versions of Modelling Software 80 2.5.2 Base Model Calibration 81 2.5.3 Base Model Validation 81 2.5.4 Proposed Model Development 82 2.5.4.1 Changes to Junction Design 84 2.5.4.2 Changes to Traffic Flow 85 2.5.4.3 Demand Dependency Adjustments 85 2.6 Proposed Model Optimisation 86 2.6.1 Initial Optimisation 87 2.6.1.1 Underutilised Green Time (UGT) 87 2.6.1.2 Junction Storage Effects 89 2.6.1.3 Cycle Time Optimisation 89 2.6.1.4 Junction Performance 89 2.6.2 Optimisation Fine Tuning 90 2.6.2.1 Balancing the Network 90 2.6.2.2 Utilisation of Network Capacity 91 2.6.2.3 Protecting the Network 91 2.6.3 Proposal Evaluation & Impact Assessment 91 2.7 Model Reports 92 2.7.1 Calibration Report 92 2.7.2 Validation Report 93 8 Traffic Modelling Guidelines 2.7.3 Proposal Report 94 3 LinSig Modelling 95 3.1 Introduction 95 3.2 LinSig Version 3 96 3.3 Appropriate Use of LinSig 96 3.3.1 Skeleton Models 96 3.3.2 Isolated Junctions / Multiple Streams with Single Controller 97 3.3.3 Networks 97 3.3.4 Proposed Design Changes 97 3.4 LinSig Modelling Approach 97 3.5 Program Settings 98 3.5.1 Junction Details 98 3.5.2 Controller Details 98 3.6 Model Build 99 3.6.1 LinSig Model Structure 99 3.6.2 Traffic Flows 100 3.6.3 Routing / Lane Usage 100 3.6.4 Saturation Flows 101 3.6.5 Flare Usage 101 3.6.6 Priority Give-Way Parameters 102 3.6.7 Opposed Right-Turning Vehicles 102 3.6.8 Demand-Dependent Stages 102 3.6.9 Exit-blocking 103 3.7 LinSig Output 103 3.7.1 Link Results 103 3.7.2 Cyclic Flow Profile and Uniform Queue Graphs 103 3.7.3 Report Builder 104 3.8 LinSig Calibration Requirements 104 3.9 LinSig Validation Requirements 104 3.10 Developing Proposed Models 105 3.10.1 Cycle Time Optimisation 105 3.10.2 Signal Timing Optimisation 105 3.11 Additional LinSig Modelling Issues 105 3.11.1 Sliver Queues 105 4 TRANSYT Modelling 108 4.1 Introduction 108 4.1.1 TRANSYT 13 108 4.1.2 TranEd 109 4.1.3 Appropriate Use of TRANSYT 109 4.2 TRANSYT Modelling Approach 110 4.2.1 Program Settings 111 4.3 Model Build 112 4.3.1 TRANSYT Network Structure 112 4.3.2 TRANSYT Labelling Convention 114 4.3.2.1 Node Numbering 115 4.3.2.2 Traffic Link Numbering 115 Contents 9 4.3.2.3 Pedestrian Link Numbering 115 4.3.2.4 Exit Link Numbering 115 4.3.2.5 Priority Link Numbering 115 4.3.3 Node Input Data 116 4.3.3.1 Signalised Nodes 116 4.3.3.2 Non-Signalised Nodes 116 4.3.4 Link Input Data 116 4.3.4.1 Major Links 117 4.3.4.2 Minor Links 117 4.3.4.3 Signal-Controlled Links 118 4.3.4.4 Bottleneck Links 118 4.3.4.5 Give-Way Links 118 4.3.4.6 Flared Approaches 119 4.3.4.7 Pedestrian Links 119 4.3.4.8 Entry and Exit Links 120 4.4 Modelling Techniques 120 4.4.1 Flow Smoothing 120 4.4.2 Adjustment of Start and End Lags 121 4.4.3 Demand-Dependency 121 4.4.4 Exit-Blocking / Underutilised Green Time 122 4.4.5 Opposed Right-Turn Movements at Signals 122 4.4.5.1 Stop and Delay Weightings 123 4.4.5.2 Queue Limits 124 4.5 Public Transport 125 4.6 Calibrated TRANSYT Base Model 125 4.7 Validated TRANSYT Base Model 126 4.8 Developing Proposed Models 126 4.8.1 Modifying Network Structure 127 4.9 TRANSYT Network Optimisation 128 4.9.1 Cycle Time Optimisation 128 4.9.2 Signal Timing Optimisation 128 4.10 TRANSYT Output 129 4.10.1 .PRT File 129 4.10.2 Graphical Output 130 5 VISSIM Modelling 132 5.1 Introduction 132 5.1.1 Appropriate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impacts of HGV Tolling Schemes
    1 Environmental Impacts of HGV Tolling Schemes Werner Rothengatter Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Environmental Impacts of 2 HGV Tolling Schemes Directive 2006(38 Impacts of German TollCollect Scheme Plans to Extend Directive 2006/38 Implementation Problems and Caveats More Comprehensive Internalisation Schemes Conclusions 1 Directive 2006/38 3 Full Infrastructure Cost Recovery Differentiation According to - Time of Day/Congestion (100%) - Euro Emission Category (100%) Implementation in Austria and Germany Use of Revenues for Road (ASFINAG) or Road/Rail/IWW (VIFG) 2 Impacts of German TollCollect Scheme 4 Introduced: 2005 GPS/km-based Charging System (Electronic + Manual) Motorways + Some Federal Primaries Charges Based on Full Life Cycle Costs Differentiation According to Euro Categories (100% since 2009) 5 Payment Value added Traffic Control System services Center "Toll Collect" Road Operator GPS Pyment Information Positioning Payment/ VAS GSM/ Call Center Internet POS SMS Forwarder On Board Value added Unit services Automatic Payment Manual Payment Micro-Simulation of Toll Impacts 6 SimulationImpacts der Auswirkungen on Distance, Empty einer Running Maut and Consignments TotalGesamtdistanz Distance EmptyLeerfahrtendistanz Running Distance OhneWithout Maut MitWith Maut Maut Ohne WithoutMaut Mit Maut With Maut SimulationsperiodenSimulation Periods Simulationsperioden Simulation Periods AnzahlConsignments Transportflle perpro WocheWeek Rckkoppelungen auf Feedback with Routenwahl Losgr§en/Frequenzen• Route/Mode Choice Transporteffizienz
    [Show full text]
  • Infogenie-AR-2002 E-FP.Pdf
    Contents 1 Contents Statement from the CEO 3 Company profile 5 Sectoral trend 7 Telecommunications 7 The Call-Center Industry 7 Status Report 9 Business performance 9 Merger 9 Capital measures 9 Developments at InfoGenie Ltd. 9 Federal German Supreme Court (BGH) 10 decision on legal help lines Order portfolio 10 Revenues and earnings 11 Changes to company entities 12 Employees 12 Stock performance 13 Key changes after the end of the period 13 under review Material risks 14 Outlook 14 Corporate Governance Code 15 Directors’ Dealings 15 Annual financial statements 16 Balance sheet 16 Profit & loss statement 17 Capital flow account 18 Movements in equity 20 Appendix 22 Audit Certificate 34 Supervisory Board Report 35 Imprint 36 Company Calendar 10 Status Report Status Report 11 Federal German Supreme Court (BGH) decision on sourcing partner. Thanks to the highly competent advisory What was particularly encouraging in the company’s co- For the financial year as a whole, the Group’s earnings came legal help lines services, this leads to essential end-customer satisfaction operation with Lexware was the renewal of the contractual to minus 3,930 k euros. Compared with the previous year The decision handed down by the German Supreme Court and a corresponding level of customer loyalty. This is where scope for 2003. After collaboration with that firm had initially (minus 4,653 k euros), the shortfall narrowed by 17 per on September 27, 2002 concerning legal advisory services InfoGenie is paid by the businesses placing the orders. been limited to the sector of payroll software (which is subject cent.
    [Show full text]
  • PTV Traffic Platform (MPC-10-229E)
    PTV TRAFFIC PLATFORM Dr. Peter T. Martin Milan Zlatkovic Piyali Chaudhuri Ivana Tasic Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah Date of Research: December 2010 – June 2011 September 2011 Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, gender expression/identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, public assistance status, sex, sexual orientation, status as a U.S. veteran, race or religion. Direct inquiries to the Vice President for Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach, 205 Old Main, (701)231-7708. TABLE OF CONTENTS _Toc297295536 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Major Features .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Review of Past Research .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 20202020 Key Figures
    Annual Report 20202020 Key figures 2020 2019 2018 IFRS IFRS IFRS Porsche SE Group Total assets € million 36,250 35,592 33,708 Equity € million 35,946 35,284 33,416 Investments accounted for at equity € million 35,259 34,597 32,518 Result from investments accounted for at equity € million 2,641 4,406 3,641 Revenue € million 107 116 103 Personnel expenses € million 80 80 77 Financial result € million 54 24 – 3 Result before tax € million 2,646 4,416 3,514 Result after tax € million 2,624 4,408 3,491 Earnings per ordinary share 1 € 8.56 14.39 11.39 Earnings per preference share 1 € 8.57 14.39 11.40 Net liquidity € million 563 553 864 Employees on 31 December 916 951 935 2020 2019 2018 HGB HGB HGB Porsche SE Net profit € million 703 788 480 Net profit available for distribution € million 676 952 676 Dividend per ordinary share € 2.204 2 2.204 2.204 Dividend per preference share € 2.210 2 2.210 2.210 1 Basic and diluted 2 Proposal to the annual general meeting of the Porsche SE Investments of Porsche SE Core Investment Stake of ordinary shares: 53.3 % (Represents a stake of subscribed capital: 31.4 %) Further Investments Minority stakes Status 10 March 2021 2020 “The fiscal year 2020 was also challenging for Porsche SE. We recorded a positive group result after tax of around 2.6 billion euro, despite conditions remaining difficult overall.” Hans Dieter Pötsch 3 1To our shareholders 6 Letter to our shareholders 8 Company boards of Porsche Automobil Holding SE and their appointments 10 Report of the supervisory board 18 Porsche SE share 26 4
    [Show full text]
  • PTV AG Dokumentvorlage Ptvagsingle En.Dot
    Final report Intelligent Cargo Systems study (ICSS) Impact assessment study on the introduction of intelligent cargo systems in transport logistics industry PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG and ECORYS Nederland B.V. Karlsruhe, October 2009 PTV AG SMART 2008/0056_ICSS_Final report Document information Document information Short title: SMART 2008/0056_ICSS_Final report Client: European Commission, DG INFSO Version: Final Report Authors: Marcel Huschebeck, Robert Piers, Dick Mans, Michael Schygulla, Dieter Wild Created on: 17.03.2009 Last saved: 28.10.2009 by Michael Schygulla Legal Notice: Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use which might be made of the information contained in the present study. The European Commission is not responsible for the external websites referred to in the present study. The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the European Commission's official view on the subject. © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged PTV AG / ECORYS Oct-09 Page 2/207 SMART 2008/0056_ICSS_Final report Contents Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Background........................................................................................ 9 1.2 Aims of the study ............................................................................... 9 1.3 Definitions and terminology.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agent-Based Modeling of Traffic Behavior in Growing Metropolitan Areas
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Transportation Research Procedia 10 ( 2015 ) 306 – 315 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, EWGT 2015, 14-16 July 2015, Delft, The Netherlands Agent-based modeling of traffic behavior in growing metropolitan areas Karsten Hager a,*, Jürgen Rauh b, Wolfgang Rid a,c aInstitute of Urban Planning and Design, University of Stuttgart, Keplerstraße 11, 70174 Stuttgart bInstitute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg cDepartment Urban and Spatial Planning, University of Applied Sciences Erfurt, Schlüterstraße 1, 99089 Erfurt Abstract The urban settlement development of the past centuries was characterized by the process of suburbanization. Cur- rently, the process of (re-) urbanization in metropolitan areas leads to population growth. This increase results in even more traffic participants in highly condensed areas and thus challenging the urban mobility system. Capacity and frequency of service of public transportation, a city’s layout and road capacities constrain urban traffic. Transi- tions in travel behavior in Germany (e.g. less young adults consider cars as status symbols, and thus car ownership decreases) as well as the introduction of new types of mobility, such as sharing systems and electric mobility exac- erbate the challenges for the future urban mobility. Both an expansion and modernization of the transportation sys- tem and an intelligent shift of traffic streams will help to overcome those challenges. Traffic simulation software is naturally used to derive results about public transportation in metropolitan areas. With the help of agent-based modeling, however, human behavior in a certain research area can be modeled according to pre-defined rules and variables.
    [Show full text]
  • A Microscopic Simulation Study on Sirat Expressway Emelie Fransson
    LiU-ITN-TEK-A--18/004--SE Driving behavior modeling and evaluation of merging control strategies - A microscopic simulation study on Sirat Expressway Emelie Fransson 2018-02-16 Department of Science and Technology Institutionen för teknik och naturvetenskap Linköping University Linköpings universitet nedewS ,gnipökrroN 47 106-ES 47 ,gnipökrroN nedewS 106 47 gnipökrroN LiU-ITN-TEK-A--18/004--SE Driving behavior modeling and evaluation of merging control strategies - A microscopic simulation study on Sirat Expressway Examensarbete utfört i Transportsystem vid Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet Emelie Fransson Handledare Ellen Grumert Examinator Johan Olstam Norrköping 2018-02-16 Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under en längre tid från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extra- ordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns det lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/ Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet - or its possible replacement - for a considerable time from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Simulation and Evaluation Environment for a Traffic Flow Analysis System
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2010 Development of a simulation and evaluation environment for a traffic flow analysis system. Peter Bernhardt 1973- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Bernhardt, Peter 1973-, "Development of a simulation and evaluation environment for a traffic flow analysis system." (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 103. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/103 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPMENT OF A SIMULATION AND EV ALUA nON ENVIRONMENT FOR A TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS SYSTEM By Peter Bernhardt Diplom-Wirtschaftsinformatiker (FH), Wildau, 2000 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Speed School of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Industrial Engineering University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 20 1a Copyright 2010 by Peter Bernhardt All rights reserved DEVELOPMENT OF A SIMULATION AND EVALUATION ENVIRONMENT FOR A TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS SYSTEM By Peter Bernhardt A Thesis approved on July 14,2010 by the following Thesis Committee: Professor Dr. William E. Biles, Thesis Director Professor Dr. Gerald W. Evans Dr.' C.-fiffiOthY Hardin 11 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my parents who always believed in me and gave me the freedom to pursue my dreams.
    [Show full text]
  • Vorlage Pressemitteilung Englisch
    PRESS RELEASE ITS World 2018: PTV Group honoured as ambassador for Mobility as a Service (MaaS) PTV presents sustainable mobility solutions for a liveable city at the World Congress for Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) in Copenhagen Karlsruhe/Copenhagen, 18 September 2018. PTV Group has been awarded at the 25th ITS World Congress in Copenhagen for its commitment to Mobility as a Service. Ralf Frisch, Solution Director at PTV, was officially recognized for his role as an active ambassador for Mobility-as-a-Service by the MaaS Alliance, a public- private partnership. Vincent Kobesen, CEO of PTV Group, says: ‘The MaaS-Alliance award reinforces our activities to further strengthen our commitment to Mobility as a Service. We are developing advanced component technologies that enable MaaS offerings to be evaluated quickly and efficiently. Together with several cities and automobile manufacturers, we are evaluating the introduction of these services, KPIs and corresponding parameters as part of studies and what-if scenarios. They should enable MaaS and ultimately the fleets of autonomous vehicles to become part of the entire transport ecosystem’. At the 25th ITS World Congress until 21 September in Copenhagen, PTV Group presents its activities for future-oriented solutions for cities that want to optimally design mobility for people and goods for their urban space. The integrated consideration of all aspects of transport - such as air quality, e-mobility, Mobility as a Service (MaaS), transport logistics or autonomous driving - is the core competence of the enterprise. PTV technology supports the sustainable, efficient and safe implementation of mobility offers and services. Focus on quality of life - this year's trade fair motto How urban mobility will be shaped in the future will determine our quality of life to a large extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Planning Perfect Services Along Line for Passengers and Partners
    PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLANNING PERFECT SERVICES ALONG LINE FOR PASSENGERS AND PARTNERS Sonal Ahuja www.ptvgroup.com Riyadh 10h November 2013 TRAFFIC SOFTWARE www.ptvgroup.com page 2 WHY DO WE NEED MODELS? TO ESTIMATE EFFECTS OF . new road infrastructure . Public Transport supply changes H . new New . demographical developments Commercial changes zone . mobility pricing (toll, parking) . Changes in Super 1 9 9 fuel costs , Maut Diesel 1 9 5 Peage , . regulative actions www.ptvgroup.com page 3 TRANSPORT MODELS – WHY DO WE NEED MODELS? Tools are necessary to support efficient investments into the transport systems to support achieving planning targets Knowledge of the current situation • counting volumes are restricted to separated points • models cover the whole network Forecast ability • Estimation techniques as e.g. trend extrapolation are not precise enough. They cannot respect realistic reaction on impacts caused by several factors ( demographic, price structure , land use, infrastructure...) Conclusions: decisions concerning traffic problems should be based on models good models must be carefully calibrated and validate with empirical data www.ptvgroup.com page 4 Use cases: public transport planning with PTV Visum PTV Visum supports users perfectly in many tasks: 1. Basic Analysis 2. Demand Matrix Analysis 3. Route, Network and Service Planning 4. Network and Service Analysis 5. Estimating the Number of Vehicles Required 6. Performance Indicators 7. Modeling of Fare Systems 8. Line Cost and Revenue Calculation 9. Joint Analysis of external
    [Show full text]
  • PTV GROUP Bericht
    TERMS OF USE §1 OBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT 1. PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG, Haid-und-Neu-Str. 15, 76131 Karlsruhe (PTV) operates the route planning service (the "Service"). The fundamental technical features of the Service are described on the website as set out in Appendix 1. 2. The right to use the service is subject solely to these Terms of Use, in combination with PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG's licence agreements for geographical and traffic data (LGT) and the licence terms and conditions for geodata and additional data (LGA) of PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG. Their contents can be found at https://www.ptvgroup.com/en/terms-privacy/ Terms put forward by the User shall not form part of the agreement unless PTV recognises such terms in writing. 3. Use of the Service is only permitted for companies as defined in Section 14 BGB. PTV reserves the right to check the user's company status and to request supporting documentation. §2 REGISTRATION, CONCLUSION OF CONTRACT 1. Use of the Service is subject to registration. The registration is an offer by the user to PTV to conclude an agreement on use of the Service ("Licence Agreement") according to these terms of use. PTV reserves the right to accept or refuse this offer. 2. Registration may only be performed by persons who are entitled to legally represent the company for which the use of the Service is to apply. 3. The data requested by PTV when registering ("Registration Data") is to be entered accurately and in full. The user shall be obliged to amend any changes at a later date with regard to the Registration Data immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Software-Based Road Safety Analysis in Germany
    Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress Software-based road safety analysis in Germany Prof. Dr. Ulrich Brannolte (Germany, Bauhaus University Weimar - BUW, [email protected]) Dipl. - Ing. Andre Munch (Germany, Planung Transport Verkehr AG - PTV, [email protected]) Dipl. - Ing. Heiko Vo (Germany, Unfallforschung der Versicherer - GDV / UDV, [email protected]) ABSTRACT According to the IRTAD database, Germany have had the highest number of road accidents with 15,050 fatalities in 1980 (an even higher peak with almost 20,000 fatalities had to be observed before this time period in 1970) and was able to reduce this figure to about 4,467 fatalities in 2008 (over 70% reduction). A comprehensive safety management of road infrastructure becomes more and more important in different countries and on international level; specific software-based tools are decisive elements in such kind of approaches. This paper gives an insight into Germany’s analytical road safety work based on the policies and two methods for network safety management applied on macro and micro levels. In Germany a guideline ESN had been issued in 2003. Its methodology focus on the traffic volume and the severity of accidents within the road network by evaluating the accidents on the basis of accident cost rates. Comparing actual accident-cost density [C /km] with a hypothetical estimated base accident-cost density provides information on the so-called safety potential of road sections. The safety potential is the most important parameter to identify network sections on which safety improvement measures are expected to have the greatest effect.
    [Show full text]