Electron-Spin Dynamics in Elliptically Polarized Light Waves
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Electron-spin dynamics in elliptically polarized light waves 1, 1, 2 1, 2 Heiko Bauke, ∗ Sven Ahrens, and Rainer Grobe 1Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 2Intense Laser Physics Theory Unit and Department of Physics, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790-4560 USA (Dated: November 4, 2014) We investigate the coupling of the spin angular momentum of light beams with elliptical polarization to the spin degree of freedom of free electrons. It is shown that this coupling, which is of similar origin as the well-known spin-orbit coupling, can lead to spin precession. The spin-precession frequency is proportional to the product of the laser-field’s intensity and its spin density. The electron-spin dynamics is analyzed by employing exact numerical methods as well as time-dependent perturbation theory based on the fully relativistic Dirac equation and on the nonrelativistic Pauli equation that is amended by a relativistic correction that accounts for the light’s spin density. PACS numbers: 03.65.Pm, 31.15.aj, 31.30.J– 1. Introduction quantum mechanical equations of motion, relativistic and non- relativistic. Subsequently, we solve these equations via time- dependent perturbation theory in Sec. 3 and by numerical meth- Novel light sources such as the ELI-Ultra High Field Facility, ods in Sec. 4. In Sec. 5 we estimate under which experimental for example, envisage to provide field intensities in excess of 20 2 conditions the predicted spin precession may be realized before 10 W/cm and field frequencies in the x-ray domain [1–6]. we summarize our results in Sec. 6. Such facilities open the possibility of probing light-matter inter- action in the ultra-relativistic regime [7–9]. In this regime, the quantum dynamical interaction of electrons, ions, or atoms can be modified due to relativistic corrections of the Dirac equation 2. Electrons in standing laser fields to the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation. In certain setups, however, relativistic effects may change the dynamics not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively. As an example, spin-orbit 2.1. Laser fields with elliptical polarization interaction, that is, the interaction of a particle’s spin with its orbital angular momentum, can lead to a splitting of atomic We examine electrons in standing light waves formed by two energy levels, which are degenerated within the framework of counterpropagating laser beams with circular or elliptic polar- nonrelativistic quantum theory. At ultra-high laser intensities ization. The electric and magnetic field components of two also, spin effects can set in [10–12]. elliptically polarized laser fields counterpropagating in the di- In our recent publication [13], we demonstrated that relativis- rection of the x axis are given by tic effects may also modify the spin dynamics of an electron ! ! 2π(x ct) 2π(x ct) in external electromagnetic waves with elliptical polarization. E1;2(r; t) = Eˆ cos ∓ ey + cos ∓ η ez ; This effect can be attributed to a coupling of the spin density λ λ ± that is associated with the external laser field to the electron’s (1a) ! ! spin. The coupling between the electronic spin and the pho- Eˆ 2π(x ct) 2π(x ct) B (r; t) = cos ∓ η e cos ∓ ez : tonic spin is of similar origin as the well-known spin-orbit 1;2 c ∓ λ ± y ± λ effect. Both effects have in common that two angular momen- (1b) arXiv:1409.2647v2 [quant-ph] 3 Nov 2014 tum degrees of freedom are coupled that are of different origin. Other examples for the interaction between different kinds of Here, we have introduced the speed of light c, the position T angular momentum have been studied in very different contexts, vector r = (x; y; z) , the time t, and ex, ey, and ez denoting e. g., the angular momentum of phonons in a magnetic crystal unit vectors in the direction of the coordinate axes. The two and the angular momentum of the crystal [14] or the orbital electromagnetic waves (1) feature the same wavelength λ, the angular momentum of light and the internal degrees of motion same electric field amplitude Eˆ, and the same intensity in molecules [15], to mention two recent examples. 2 In this contribution, we elaborate and extend the theoreti- I = "0cEˆ (2) cal description of the electron’s spin dynamics as studied in but have opposite helicity. The parameter η ( π; π] deter- Ref. [13]. The article is organized as follows. In Sec. 2 we 2 − describe the considered laser setup and derive the electron’s mines the degree of ellipticity with η = 0 and η = π correspond- ing to linear polarization and η = π/2 to circular polarization. Introducing the wave number k =±2π/λ and the lasers’ angular frequency ! = kc, the total electric and magnetic fields of the ∗ [email protected] standing laser wave that is formed by superimposing the two 2 Note, that for plane wave fields the photonic spin density may be expressed solely by the electric field and the magnetic z y B vector potential, see (5), and many works utilize the expression " E A to define the photonic spin density, which is not equiv- x 0 × λ alent to "0(E A + cB C)/2 for none-plane-wave fields, e. g., standing waves.× The total× amount of spin angular momentum, E however, does not depend on which of both densities is chosen [22], this means Z Z " FIG. 1: (Color online) Schematic illustration of the electric (solid red " E A d3r = 0 (E A + cB C) d3r ; (7) line) and magnetic (dotted blue line) field components of the standing 0 × 2 × × laser wave (3) with η = π/2 that is a superposition of two counterprop- agating circularly polarized laser waves of opposite helicity and equal where the integration goes over all space regions with non- wavelength λ. The electric and magnetic components E and B are vanishing electromagnetic fields. parallel to each other and rotate around the propagation direction. Furthermore, note that the given expressions for the photonic spin density require that the electromagnetic vector potentials A and C are given in Coulomb gauge. If another gauge is electric and magnetic field components (1a) and (1b) follow as applied then A and C in the definition of the spin density have to be replaced by A? and C?, which are defined by splitting the vector potentials A and C such that A = A? + Ak and r A? = 0 E(r; t) = 2Eˆ cos kx (cos !t ey + cos(!t η) ez) ; (3a) · − and r Ak = 0 and similarly for the electric vector potential C 2Eˆ [23]. Thus× the Coulomb gauge is the most convenient gauge to B(r; t) = sin kx ( sin(!t η) e + sin !t ez) : (3b) c − − y study effects of the photonic spin and it is therefore employed here. All predicted effects of this contribution result from For circular fields (η = π/2), the electric and the magnetic gauge invariant quantum mechanical wave equations and are, components (3) are parallel to each other and rotate around the therefore, independent of the choice of the gauge. propagation direction as sketched in Fig. 1. The elliptically polarized fields (1) carry spin angular mo- mentum [16, 17]. The partition of a general light beam’s total angular momentum into orbital angular momentum and spin 2.2. Quantum dynamics in momentum angular momentum was debated in the literature. A definition space that seems to be well established now [18–21] utilizes Coulomb gauge vector potentials for both the magnetic as well as the Introducing the window function, which allows for a smooth electric field component. The Coulomb gauge vector potentials turn-on and turn-off of the laser field, A1;2 and C1;2 of the elliptically polarized fields (1) are 8 >sin2 πt if 0 t ∆T, > 2∆T ≤ ≤ Eˆ w(t) = <1 if ∆T t T ∆T, (8) C1;2(r; t) = ( sin(kx !t η) ey sin(kx !t) ez) ; > > 2 π(T t) ≤ ≤ − −! ± ∓ ± − ∓ :sin − if T ∆T t T, (4a) 2∆T − ≤ ≤ Eˆ the magnetic vector potential of the combined laser fields (3) A1;2(r; t) = ( sin(kx !t) ey sin(kx !t η) ez) : is given by −! ∓ ∓ ∓ ∓ ± (4b) 2w(t)Eˆ A(r; t) = cos kx (sin !t e + sin(!t η) ez) : (9) These potentials are related to the electromagnetic fields via − ! y − E = A˙ = cr C , B = r A = C˙ /c and 1;2 1;2 1;2 1;2 1;2 1;2 The parameters T and ∆T denote the total interaction time and the potentials− comply− × with the Coulomb× gauge as−r A = 1;2 the turn-on and turn-off intervals. The quantum mechanical r C = 0. With these quantities the spin density of each· laser 1;2 evolution of an electron of mass m and charge q = e in the field· is given by the expression " (E A + cB C )/2, 0 1;2 1;2 1;2 1;2 laser field with the vector potential (9) is governed by− the Dirac which reduces in the case of the plane× wave fields (1)× to equation ˆ2 "0 "0E λ sin η 2 (E A +cB C ) = " E A = ex : i~Ψ(˙ r; t) = cα i~r qA(r; t) + mc β Ψ(r; t) (10) 2 1;2 × 1;2 1;2 × 1;2 0 1;2 × 1;2 2πc · − − (5) T The total photonic spin density of the setup is with the Dirac matrices α = (αx; αy; αz) and β [24, 25]. The quasi one-dimensional sinusoidal structure of the vector poten- 2 "0 "0Eˆ λ sin η tial (9) allows us to cast the partial differential equation (10) (E A + cB C) = ex ; (6) 2 × × πc into a set of coupled ordinary differential equations [12].