DOCSLIB.ORG

Lexicographic Treatment of the Valency Aspects of Verbal Diatheses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lexicographic Treatment of the Valency Aspects of Verbal Diatheses Charles University in Prague Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Doctoral Thesis LEXICOGRAPHIC TREATMENT OF THE VALENCY ASPECTS OF VERBAL DIATHESES Anna Vernerová Prague, 2019 Doctoral Thesis Anna Vernerová Supervisor of the doctoral thesis: doc. RNDr. Markéta Lopatková, Ph.D. Lexicographic treatment of the valency aspects of verbal diatheses Study programme: Computer Science Specialization: Mathematical Linguistics Typeset with LATEX. Prague, 2019 I declare that I carried out this doctoral thesis independently, and only with the cited sources, literature and other professional sources. I understand that my work relates to the rights and obligations under the Act No. 121/2000 Coll., the Copyright Act, as amended, in particular the fact that the Charles University has the right to conclude a license agreement on the use of this work as a school work pursuant to Section 60 paragraph 1 of the Copyright Act. In . ........... Název práce: Slovníkové zpracování valenčních aspektů slovesných diatezí Autor: Anna Vernerová Ústav: Ústav formální a aplikované lingvistiky Vedoucí disertační práce: doc. RNDr. Markéta Lopatková, Ph.D., Ústav formální a aplikované lingvistiky Klíčová slova: valence, diateze, pasivní participium Abstrakt: Diateze, a to jak ty tvořené pomocí pasivního participia (pasivum, prostý a posesivní rezultativ, recipientní diateze), tak i tzv. zvratné pasivum (deagentizace) byly v minulosti předmětem řady studií jak v bohemistické, tak i v mezinárodní lingvistice, pro češtinu ale dosud chybělo jejich důkladné slovníkové zpracování. V této dizertační práci se zabývám zachycením diatezí tvořených pomocí pasivního participia a s nimi příbuzných verbonominálních konstrukcí v gramatické komponentě valenčního slovníkuVALLEX. Vlastnímu tématu práce předchází krátký historický úvod a podrobné shrnutí pojetí valence ve Funkčním generativním popisu. Title: Lexicographic treatment of the valency aspects of verbal diatheses Author: Anna Vernerová Department: Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Supervisor: doc. RNDr. Markéta Lopatková, Ph.D., Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Keywords: valency, diathesis, passive participle Abstract: Diatheses have been the topic of a number of linguistic studies in Czech as well as international linguistics. Previous investigations have led to the delimitation of diatheses formed with the passive participle (the passive, objective (with auxiliary být ‘to be’) and possessive (with auxiliary mít ‘to have’) resultative, and recipient diatheses) and the so-called reflexive passive (deagen- tive diathesis), but systematic dictionary treatment has not been carried out yet. This dissertation is concerned with the diatheses that are formed with the passive participle and their treatment in the Functional Generative Description (FGD). After a thorough description of the valency theory of FGD, I discuss the design of the Grammatical Component of the valency lexicon VALLEX, concentrating on the rules for the formation of the diatheses that are built with the passive par- ticiple. Related verbonominal constructions and a new candidate for treatment as a diathesis (the subjective resultative) are also discussed. To my parents, who taught me the love of words, and to my husband, who a thousand times helped me survive the despair of a semicolon missing at an unidentifiable place in a perl script. Contents Contents viii List of Figures and Tables xi Preface xiii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The topic of this dissertation ..................... 1 1.2 Method ................................ 3 1.3 Structure of this dissertation ..................... 4 I Valency in linguistics and especially in the Func- tional Generative Description 7 2 Valency in historical and international perspectives 9 2.1 First steps towards the concept of valency . 10 2.1.1 Aristotle ............................ 10 2.1.2 The Medieval era ....................... 12 2.2 Václav Philomates and Jan Blahoslav: Grammatica česká . 13 2.3 Sentence diagrams .......................... 24 2.4 Predecessors of the Valency Theory of the Functional Generative Description .............................. 36 2.5 Existing reviews of the literature concerned with valency . 40 2.6 Valency lexicons ............................ 41 3 Valency in the Functional Generative Description 45 3.1 Linguistic analysis through a system of layers . 46 viii CONTENTS 3.1.1 Meaning vs. content ..................... 46 3.1.2 The full system of layers ................... 49 3.1.3 A simplified system of layers . 53 3.1.4 Place of valency in the system of layers . 54 3.2 Structure of the lexicon: lexemes and lexical units . 58 3.2.1 Aspect and aspectual pairs (or n-tuples) . 58 3.2.2 Homonymy: criteria for distinguishing separate lexemes . 61 3.2.3 Polysemy: criteria for distinguishing separate lexical units 63 3.3 Delimiting and labelling complementations . 66 3.3.1 What constitutes a complementation . 66 3.3.2 Actants and free modifications . 67 3.3.3 The principle of actant shifting . 73 3.4 Obligatory and optional complementations: the dialogue test . 86 3.4.1 Typical and alternating complementations . 90 3.5 Forms of expression .......................... 91 3.6 Valency frames ............................ 93 3.6.1 Order of the complementations in a valency frame . 94 3.6.2 Typographic conventions ................... 95 3.7 Additional attributes of lexical units. Division of the lexicon into Data and Grammar Components . 95 3.8 Valency within the system of layers . 97 II Verbal diatheses and related deverbal adjectives 101 4 General structure of the rules 103 5 Constructions with the auxiliary být ‘to be’ 111 5.1 Passive and objective resultative diatheses with auxiliary být ‘to be’ 111 5.1.1 Passive and resultative in the Prague Dependency Treebank 114 5.1.2 Passive and resultative diathesis in the Data Component of VALLEX . 118 5.1.3 The basic rule . 119 5.1.4 Supplementary rules . 124 5.1.4.1 Transitive verbs . 125 5.1.4.1a Verbs with an accusative complementation . 125 5.1.4.1b Verbs with a genitive complementation . 133 5.1.4.2 Intransitive verbs . 135 5.1.4.2a Intransitive verbs with a genitive complementation . 135 5.1.4.2b Fluctuating verbs with a genitive complementation . 139 ix CONTENTS 5.1.4.2c Intransitive verbs without a genitive complementation . 144 5.2 Adjectives derived from passive participles . 148 5.2.1 Adjectives derived from passive participles of transitive verbs152 5.3 Resultative and adjectives derived from verbs with an accusative ‘Experiencer’ and nominative ‘Stimulus’ . 154 5.4 Subjective resultative derived from reflexive verbs . 160 6 Possessive resultative (with the auxiliary mít ‘to have’) 169 6.1 Possessive resultative of non-conversive type . 171 6.2 Possessive resultative of conversive type . 176 6.2.1 Basic rules ............................176 6.2.2 Supplementary rules . 182 6.3 The possessive resultative and verbal aspect . 186 7 Recipient diathesis (with the auxiliary dostat ‘to get’) 187 7.1 The recipient diathesis in VALLEX . 187 7.2 Verbs entering the recipient diathesis . 192 7.3 Recipient diathesis in the Prague Dependency Treebank . 196 7.4 Recipient diathesis with the auxiliary mít/mívat ‘to have’? . 197 7.5 The recipient diathesis and verbal aspect . 198 7.5.1 The recipient passive diathesis on the event–state continuum201 7.6 Recipient-like structures derived from dát + inf ‘let/give sb inf’ . 203 8 Conclusion 205 8.1 Summary ...............................205 8.2 Future work .............................. 207 8.2.1 The boundary between resultative and verbonominal readings207 8.2.2 The passive participle in spoken data . 207 Bibliography 213 Index 239 A Types of complementations 241 B Alternations and diatheses: terminology and examples 249 C The Grammatical Component 253 D List of publications 259 x List of Figures and Tables 1.1 Types and subtypes of diatheses ..................... 2 2.1 Sentence diagrams of Clark (1847) and March (1867) . 28 2.2 Sentence diagrams of Reed and Kellogg (1876) . 29 2.3 Sentence diagrams of Kern (1883b) ................... 30 2.4 Gebauer’s in-line marking of a relation between two words (1904) . 31 2.5 Gebauer’s marking of phrase structure (1904) . 32 2.6 Gebauer’s system for capturing the dependency structure of com- pound sentences (1904) .......................... 33 2.7 A sentence diagram of Šmilauer (1947) . 34 2.8 A sentence diagram of Tesnière (1959) . 35 3.1 System of layers in the Functional Generative Description . 50 3.2 Analysis of a sample sentence from PCEDT on four layers of annotation 55 3.3 Example entries from the valency lexicon VALLEX . 57 3.4 Illustrating the concepts of lexeme, lexical units and lexical forms.A similar figure has been used at least since (Žabokrtský, 2005, p.35), e.g. lately in the introductory part of VALLEX (Lopatková et al., 2016a, p. 24). .............................. 65 3.5 Characteristics of actants and free modifications . 69 3.6 Characteristics of quasivalency complementations . 70 3.7 Schema of actant shifting ........................ 74 3.8 t-layer and a-layer representations of two sentences . 99 5.1 Sample annotation of the passive diathesis in PDT. 115 5.2 Sample annotation of the resultative diathesis in PDT. 116 5.3 Sample annotation of a verbonominal construction in PDT. 117 xi List of Figures and Tables 8.1 Number of rules for each type of construction . 206 A.1 Characteristics of actants and free modifications . 242 A.2 Characteristics of quasivalency complementations . 243 A.3 Actants and quasivalency complementations . 244 A.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metalanguage and Encoding Scheme Design for Digital Lexicography
    MONDILEX: I УШ ИИ а Conceptual Modelling of Networking of '•ШАШЛ ЩЛ Centres for High-Quality Research in Slavic Lexicography and Their Digital Resources L. Stur Institute of Linguistics Slovak Academy of Sciences Metalanguage and Encoding Scheme Design for Digital Lexicography MONDILEX Third Open Workshop Bratislava, Slovakia, 15-16 April, 2009 Proceedings Bratislava 2009 MONDILEX: Conceptual Modelling of Networking of Centres for High- Quality Research in Slavic Lexicography and Their Digital Resources Ľ. Štúr Institute of Linguistics, Slovak Academy of Sciences Metalanguage and Encoding Scheme Design for Digital Lexicography Innovative Solutions for Lexical Entry Design in Slavic Lexicography MONDILEX Third Open Workshop Bratislava, Slovakia, 15–16 April, 2009 Proceedings Radovan Garabík (Ed.) The workshop is organized by the project GA 211938 MONDILEX Conceptual Modelling of Networking of Centres for High-Quality Research in Slavic Lexicography and Their Digital Resources supported by EU FP7 programme Capacities – Research Infrastructures Design studies for research infrastructures in all S&T fields Metalanguage and Encoding Scheme Design for Digital Lexicography Bratislava, Ľ. Štúr Institute of Linguistics, 2009. The volume contains contributions presented at the Third open workshop “Metalanguage and encoding scheme design for digital lexicography”, held in Bratislava, Slovakia, on 15–16 April 2009. The workshop is organized by the international project GA 211938 MONDILEX Conceptual Modelling of Networking of Centres for High- Quality
    [Show full text]
  • Monosemy and the Dictionary Henri Béjoint
    Monosemy and the Dictionary Henri Béjoint I. The Notion of "Monosemy" in Linguistics The notion of "monosemy" is often mentioned by linguists, though not always under that name—Cruse (1986), for example, uses "univocality", Catford (1983:24) discusses the use of terms such as "oligosemy" "eurysemy" and "stenosemy" — but it is hardly ever defined or exemplified. Also, few linguists have tried to evaluate the quantitative importance of monosemy: how many words can be considered monosemous in English and in other languages? When evaluations are attempted, the results are surprisingly divergent, the discrepancies probably being due to the indeterminacy ofthe definition of "monosemy". The situation is all the more surprising as "polysemy" is discussed in every single book about semantics. Lexical polysemy has been considered as an unfortunate imperfection by many linguists in the past (dialectologists, after Gilliéron, and structuralists), but nowadays it is often presented as an indispensable feature of language: without polysemy, language could not cope with the diversity and the variability of the notions to be expressed. If every single "referent" had a different name, the lexical code would impose an extraordinary burden on the memory of the language user (see Hagège 1985:126).1 Whichever attitude is adopted, polysemy is important for the semanticist: indeed, for some, it is "the very object of semantics" (Rey-Debove 1971:256). If monosemy is inseparable from polysemy, it must be an equally fundamental concept. Its study is particularly important in terminology, since it is one of the most often quoted characteristics of the term as opposed to the word, but it is also important in lexicology and lexicography.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Dictionaries As Emergent Archives of Contemporary Usage and Collaborative Codification
    Online Dictionaries as Emergent Archives of Contemporary Usage and Collaborative Codification Colleen Cotter Queen Mary, University of London John Damaso Arizona State University February 2007 Abstract Within the history of modern English lexicography, individual dictionary editors have had ultimate control over the selection, meaning, and illustration of words; extensive collaboration with contributors has been limited. However, Internet technologies that easily permit exchanges between a user and a database have allowed a new type of dictionary online, one that is built by the collaboration of contributing end-users, allowing ordinary users of dictionaries who are not trained lexicographers to engage in dictionary-making. We discuss a popular online slang dictionary called UrbanDictionary.com (UD) to illustrate how lexicographic principles are joined with Web-only communication technologies to provide a context for collaborative engagement and meaning-making; and to note the many characteristics and functions shared with the traditional print dictionary. Significantly, UD captures what most traditional English dictionaries fall short of: recording ephemeral quotidian spoken language and representing popular views of meaning. By relying on the users of language to select and define words for a dictionary, UD, which defines more than 1 million words, has in effect influenced access to and formulation of the lexis. Keywords computer-mediated communication, lexicography, slang, youth language; English Queen Mary’s OPAL #9 Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 1 Introduction English lexicography stems from a tradition of relatively limited functional collaboration, beginning with Samuel Johnson’s dictionary in 1755, in which editors overseeing numerous contributors held the ultimate authority over the selection, meaning, and illustration of words.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 2 Structures Handout.Pdf
    2. The definition of a language as a structure of structures 2.1. Phonetics and phonology Relevance for studying language in its natural or primary medium: oral sounds rather than written symbols. Phonic medium: the range of sounds produced by the speech organs insofar as the play a role in language Speech sounds: Individual sounds within that range Phonetics is the study of the phonic medium: The study of the production, transmission, and reception of human sound-making used in speech. e.g. classification of sounds as voiced vs voiceless: /b/ vs /p/ Phonology is the study of the phonic medium not in itself but in relation with language. e.g. application of voice to the explanation of differences within the system of language: housen vs housev usen vs usev 2.1.1. Phonetics It is usually divided into three branches which study the phonic medium from three points of view: Articulatory phonetics: speech sounds according to the way in which they are produced by the speech organs. Acoustic phonetics: speech sounds according to the physical properties of their sound-waves. Auditory phonetics: speech sounds according to their perception and identification. Articulatory phonetics has the longest tradition, and its progress in the 19th century contributed a standardize and internationally accepted system of phonetic transcription: the origins of the International Phonetic Alphabet used today and relying on sound symbols and diacritics. It studies production in relation with the vocal tract, i.e., organs such as: lungs trachea or windpipe, containing: larynx vocal folds glottis pharyngeal cavity nose mouth, containing fixed organs: teeth and teeth ridge hard palate pharyngeal wall mobile organs: lips tongue soft palate jaw According to their function and participation, sounds may take several features: Voice: voiced vs voiceless sounds, according to the participation of the vocal folds e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Different but Not All Opposite: Contributions to Lexical Relationships Teaching in Primary School
    INTE - ITICAM - IDEC 2018, Paris-FRANCE VOLUME 1 All Different But Not All Opposite: Contributions To Lexical Relationships Teaching In Primary School Adriana BAPTISTA Polytechnic Institute of Porto – School of Media Arts and Design inED – Centre for Research and Innovation in Education Portugal [email protected] Celda CHOUPINA Polytechnic Institute of Porto – School of Education inED – Centre for Research and Innovation in Education Centre of Linguistics of the University of Porto Portugal [email protected] José António COSTA Polytechnic Institute of Porto – School of Education inED – Centre for Research and Innovation in Education Centre of Linguistics of the University of Porto Portugal [email protected] Joana QUERIDO Polytechnic Institute of Porto – School of Education Portugal [email protected] Inês OLIVEIRA Polytechnic Institute of Porto – School of Education Centre of Linguistics of the University of Porto Portugal [email protected] Abstract The lexicon allows the expression of particular cosmovisions, which is why there are a wide range of lexical relationships, involving different linguistic particularities (Coseriu, 1991; Teixeira , 2005). We find, however, in teaching context, that these variations are often replaced by dichotomous and decontextualized proposals of lexical organization, presented, for instance, in textbooks and other supporting materials (Baptista et al., 2017). Thus, our paper is structured in two parts. First, we will try to account for the diversity of lexical relations (Choupina, Costa & Baptista, 2013), considering phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic- discursive, cognitive and historical criteria (Lehmann & Martin-Berthet, 2008). Secondly, we present an experimental study that aims at verifying if primary school pupils intuitively organize their mental lexicon in a dichotomous way.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Shifts in the Sphere of Evaluative Units
    Center for Open Access in Science ▪ Belgrade - SERBIA 3rd International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences http://centerprode.com/conferences/3IeCSHSS.html ISBN (Online) 978-86-81294-02-4 ▪ 2019: 201-210 _________________________________________________________________________ Semantic Shifts in the Sphere of Evaluative Units Tatiana Sallier St. Petersburg State University, RUSSIAN FEDERATION Department of Philology, St. Petersburg Abstract The purpose of the research is to trace some semantic processes occurring in the sphere of evaluative units – lexemes with “good” or “bad” element of meaning. The article is aimed at proving that evaluative units display a semantic shift from more concrete to more abstract meaning. Evaluative lexemes are known to include a denotative (more concrete) seme and an evaluative (abstract) seme. In the process of usage, the denotative seme is suppressed and the lexeme acquires purely evaluative meaning. In the process of “name calling”, “bad” words lose their denotative element and become pure invectives. The denotative seme may not even be known to the speaker. The loss of denotative meaning may occur in the process of word borrowing. Latin “paganus” – a rural dweller – came to mean “pagan” in European languages and the word “поганый” in Russian means just “bad”. Keywords: evaluative, pejorative, semantic shifts, denotative. 1. Introduction The article is aimed at tracing semantic tendencies operating in the sphere of pejorative evaluative lexemes – that is lexemes including an evaluative element of meaning. An evaluative lexeme may be purely evaluative – that is, bear no other meaning except evaluation. Such adjectives as English “good” and “bad” or Russian “хороший”, “плохой” may serve as examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbs of 'Preparing Something for Eating by Heating It in a Particular
    DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOLOGÍA INGLESA Y ALEMANA Verbs of ‘preparing something for eating by heating it in a particular way’: a lexicological analysis Grado en Estudios Ingleses Fabián García Díaz Tutora: Mª del Carmen Fumero Pérez San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife 8 de septiembre de 2015 INDEX 1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Theoretical perspective ........................................................................................................ 6 4. Analysis: verbs of to prepare something for eating by heating it in a particular way: cook, fry and roast. ................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Corpus selection .............................................................................................................. 9 4.2. Verb selection ................................................................................................................ 11 5. Paradigmatic relations ....................................................................................................... 13 5.1. Semantic components and lexematic analysis ............................................................... 13 5.2. Lexical relations ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Emotional Vocabulary and Its Functioning in Story of Alexander Ivanovich Kuprin “Swamp” 61
    Emotional vocabulary and its functioning in story of Alexander Ivanovich Kuprin “Swamp” 61 EMoTional vocabulary and its functioNiNg iN stoRy of AlExander IvanoviCh KUpRiN “Swamp” Vocabulario emoCional y su funcionamiento en lA histoRiA dE AlExANder IvANoviCh KUpRiN “Pantano” ABSTRACT The article is devoted to the problem of using words of different parts of speech in a work of fiction, which call emotions in direct meaning. The method of structural and semantic analysis identified and described the emotive lexemes contained in the story of A.I. Kuprina “Swamp”. The number of emotional units has been determined by facilities of the part of speech, as a result of which it was established that emotive adjectives (102 units) are the most common in the analyzed story. The contexts of the using of words are systematized, among which the most numerous were those where words with denotative seme “emotion” are combined with non- emotional lexemes. Attention is paid to the peculiarities of the individual author’s use of complex emotive adjectives. The theoretical significance of the results obtained is to identify the emotionally colored words in the story of A.I. Kuprin and their systematization by facilities of the part of speech; in clarifying of the meaning of the words of emotive semantics on the basis of their functioning in the language of a separate a work of fiction and in Russian language as a whole; in the description of contexts containing emotive vocabulary. The practical significance of the considered material is the possibility of applying of the results obtained in the practice of teaching the modern Russian language to a non-Russian audience and philological analysis of a literary text in scientific researches of this kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Handouts for Advanced Phonology: a Course Packet Steve Parker GIAL
    Handouts for Advanced Phonology: A Course Packet Steve Parker GIAL and SIL International Dallas, 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Steve Parker and other contributors Page 1 of 281 Preface This set of materials is designed to be used as handouts accompanying an advanced course in phonology, particularly at the graduate level. It is specifically intended to be used in conjunction with two textbooks: Phonology in generative grammar (Kenstowicz 1994), and Optimality theory (Kager 1999). However, this course packet could potentially also be adapted for use with other phonology textbooks. The materials included here have been developed by myself and others over many years, in conjunction with courses in phonology taught at SIL programs in North Dakota, Oregon, Dallas, and Norman, OK. Most recently I have used them at GIAL. Many of the special phonetic characters appearing in these materials use IPA fonts available as freeware from the SIL International website. Unless indicated to the contrary on specific individual handouts, all materials used in this packet are the copyright of Steve Parker. These documents are intended primarily for educational use. You may make copies of these works for research or instructional purposes (under fair use guidelines) free of charge and without further permission. However, republication or commercial use of these materials is expressly prohibited without my prior written consent. Steve Parker Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics Dallas, 2018 Page 2 of 281 1 Table of contents: list of handouts included in this packet Day 1: Distinctive features — their definitions and uses -Pike’s premises for phonological analysis ......................................................................... 7 -Phonemics analysis flow chart ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Semic Analysis Summary
    Louis Hébert, Tools for Text and Image Analysis: An Introduction to Applied Semiotics 10. SEMIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY Semic analysis was developed within the field of semantics (the study of meaning in linguistic units). This chapter presents Rastier's interpretive semantics, and semic analysis as formulated therein. Semic analysis is performed on a semiotic act – a text, for example – by identifying the semes, that is, the elements of meaning (parts of the signified), defining clusters of semes (isotopies and molecules) and determining the relations between the clusters (relations of presupposition, comparison, etc., between the isotopies). The repetition of a seme creates an isotopy. For example, in "There was a fine ship, carved from solid gold / With azure reaching masts, on seas unknown" (Émile Nelligan, "The Golden Ship"), the words "ship", "masts" and "seas" all contain the seme /navigation/ (as well as others). The repetition of this seme creates the isotopy /navigation/. A semic molecule is a cluster of at least two semes appearing together more than once in a single semantic unit (a single word, for instance). For instance, in the poem just quoted, there is a semic molecule formed by the semes /precious/ + /dispersion/. It appears in the "streaming hair" ("cheveux épars") of the beautiful Goddess of Love (Venus) who was "spread-eagled" ("s'étalait") at the ship's prow, and also in the sinking of the ship's treasure, which the sailors "disputed amongst themselves" ("entre eux ont disputés"). 1. THEORY Semic analysis is performed on a semiotic act – such as a text – by identifying the semes (the elements of meaning), finding clusters of semes (isotopies and molecules) and determining the relations between the clusters (relations of presupposition, comparison, etc., between the isotopies).
    [Show full text]
  • Page | 41 Research Article in Uzbek Linguistics, Such Scientists As A
    April 2021 e-ISSN: 1857-8187 p-ISSN: 1857-8179 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4779037 Research Article Morphology and Semantics SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF DERIVATIVE WORDS IN UZBEK Keywords: morpheme, word formation, sememe, seme, ema, polysemous lexemes, LANGUAGE potential seme, derivative seme, relative seme. Jumaeva Feruza Djizak State Pedagogical Institute. City Djizak, Uzbekistan. Abstract This article provides semantic analysis of word structure and construction. The meaning of the derivate word has been studied on the basis of sememe, seme and ema. The possibilities of polysemantic morphemes in word formation are illuminated. An analysis of the formation of artificial words based on semantics is given. It is based on the fact that the meaning of a word has basic and peripheral semantics and that it is important to pay attention to these semantics when studying artificial words by the method of semantic analysis. The semantic and polysemous lexemes of word formation are described. The formation of polysemous lexemes was determined on the basis of each semaphore of polysemous lexemes. The semantic structure of artificial words is studied on the basis of the method of component analysis. The meaning of compound words is analyzed on the basis of sememe, seme, ema. The formation of compound words based on lexemes, sememas, and semantics has been studied. Based on the semantics of polysemous morphemes, the formation of compound words with different meanings has been identified. The formation of lexical units on the basis of free compound (phrase), fixed compound (phrase) and the transition of a sentence to a compound word have been analyzed analytically, and the distinctive features of these units are explained on the basis of semantic, syntactic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Thing to Teach (Which Is Often Never Taught)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 334 847 FL 019 299 AUTHOR Viaggio, Sergio TITLE The First Thing To Teach (Which Is Often Never Taught). PUB DATE 91 NOTE 21p.; Paper presented at the Anrual Meeting of the First Language International Conference (Elsinore, Denmark, 1991). PUB TYPE Viewpoints (Opinion/Position Papers, Essays, etc.) (120) -- Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Classroom Techniques; Curriculum Design; Curriculum Development; Educational Needs; Educational Strategies; *Interpretive Skills; *Language Processing; Professional Training; Skill Development; *Translation ABSTRACT Professional training for translators, most often begun in specialized subject areas, shoule begin with a coursein translation theory. The first purpose of such a course is to teach students to think as translators, whose function is to conveythe message contained in the source language. Simply stated,this is a three-step process of:(1) isolation of semantic meaning (interpretation);(2) conversion of that semantic meaning back into a linguistic form in the target language(re-expression); and (3) refinement or specification (collation). Secondly,the student must develop a thorough understanding of how languages wozk inrelatich to one another (general linguistics).Finally, the practitioner must learn the relative independence of form and meaningin language, and then the need to know the situation of the text as well asits context. The student should learn to further distinguishmeaning, Wiich is linguistic, from cense, which is extra-linguistic,and to understand the elements of situation in a text: intention;motive; cultural background; social, educational, and professionaJlevel; linguistic competence; linguistic style; personalitiesof author and intended audience, etc. While tho foremost task of translatingis a linguistic one, the broader objective is textual equivalence.
    [Show full text]