Petrology, Stratigraphy and Sedimentation of the Middle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Petrology, Stratigraphy and Sedimentation of the Middle PETROLOGY, STRATIGRAPHY AND SEDIMENTATION OF THE MIDDLE PROTEROZOIC BAYFIELD GROUP, NORTHWESTERN WISCONSIN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Kent Fred Adamson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 1997 © Kent Fred Adamson, 1997 Abstract The Bayfield Group (Middle Proterozoic, Lake Superior region) is composed of three formations which are, from oldest to youngest, the feldspatholithic to lithofeldspathic Orienta Formation; the quartz-arenitic Devils Island Sandstone; and the feldspatholithic Chequamegon Formation. The average QFL percentages are 69/17 /14 for the Orienta Formation, 95/4/1 for the Devils Island Sandstone, and 79/14/7 for the Chequamegon Formation. The large amounts of quartz and appreciable feldspar suggest that the primary provenance was older Early and Archean rocks. Diagenetic action on the Bayfield Group is evidenced by authigenic quartz, hematite, kaolinite, zeolite, and minor amounts of potassium feldspar. The average pore space of the sandstones in the Bayfield Group decreases with depth. Dissolution of potassium feldspar is the major factor in the development of minor secondary porosity. Accessory minerals show that "normal" zircon is the most prevalent form found within the non-opaque, non-micaceous suite. The presence of "normal" zircons suggests that a potential provenance was Keweenawan volcanics; some residence time in previously deposited rift sediments (such as the Oronto Group) may have occurred. The minor amount of other zircon varieties support the framework grain analyses that older Early Proterozoic and Archean sources were shedding major amounts of sediment into the depositional basin. The Bayfield Group was deposited in a transgressive-regressive lacustrine to fluvial environnment in the waning stages of the Midcontinent Rift System. The Orienta and Chequamegon Formations represent fluvial environments of deposition while the Devils Island Sandstone was likely deposited in a nearshore lacustrine depositional environment. The paleocurrent trend for the Devils Island is toward the east and southeast while paleocurrent trends for the Orienta and Chequamegon Formations are toward the northeast. The exposed sections suggest that the near-shore environment was restricted in comparison to the fluvial systems that were transporting sediment towards the central rift valley. 111 Table of Contents Abstract 111 Table of Contents lV List of Figures lX List of Plates Xl List of Tables XlV Acknowledgements xv INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose of Study 2 Methods 4 Previous Work 5 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 7 Archean Rocks 9 Early Proterozoic 10 Middle Proterozoic 11 Keweenawan Supergroup 11 Grenville Province 13 Paleozoic and Mesozoic 14 Quaternary 14 Regional Structure 15 South Shore Geophysical Data 16 Review of Upper Keweenawan Paleomagnetic Analysis 21 Age of the Bayfield Group - Conclusions 23 lV PETROLOGY - FIELD DESCRIPTIONS 24 Orienta Formation 24 Devils Island Sandstone 28 Chequamegon Formation 33 Fond du Lac Formation 35 Hinckley Sandstone 35 MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY 38 Introduction 38 Sample Preparation 38 Operational Definitions 39 Quartz 39 Feldspars 40 Lithics 41 Miscellaneous Grains 43 Cement/Matrix 44 General Petrographic Characteristics and Descriptions 45 Orienta Formation 45 Devils Island Sandstone 48 Chequamegon Formation 52 Diagenesis of the Bayfield Group 55 Paragenetic Sequence ----------------- 57 Texture 58 Porosity 59 Modal Analysis of Thin Sections 63 v Heavy Minerals 78 Sample Preparation 78 Operational Definitions 80 Modal Analysis of Heavy Minerals 84 Orienta Formation 87 Devils Island Sandstone 87 Chequamegon Formation 88 KEY AREAS IN THE BAYFIELD GROUP 91 Orienta Formation at Middle River 91 South Landing, Devils Island ----------------- 97 Northern Sand Island 101 Geologic Well Logs 105 PALEOCURRENT ANALYSIS 115 Introduction 115 Orienta Formation 118 Devils Island Sandstone 118 Chequamegon Formation 118 PROVENANCE 123 Introduction 123 Paleocurrent Evidence 124 Petrologic Evidence and Interpretation 126 Accessory Mineral Evidence and Interpretation 127 Fond du Lac Formation Data 127 Hinckley Sandstone Data 128 Vl Interpretation 128 SEDIMENTATION AND ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION 130 Fluvial Systems 130 Nearshore Lacustrine Systems 133 Laminae Sands 134 Forms of Evidence Present 135 Interpretation 138 Orienta Formation 138 Devils Island Sandstone 138 Chequamegon Formation 140 Fond du Lac Formation 140 Hinckley Sandstone 141 TECTONic!SEDIMENTARY MODELS 142 Model 1 - Orienta Formation is equal to the Chequamegon Formation 142 A. Synclinal Structure 142 B. Faulting 144 Model 2 - Orienta Formation is not equal to the Chequamegon Formation 145 CONCLUSIONS 148 REFERENCES CITED 153 Appendix A - Field Data. 160 Appendix B - Outcrop Locations. 181 Appendix C-1 - Orienta Formation Modal Analyses. 183 Appendix C-2 - Devils Island Sandstone Modal Analyses. 185 Appendix C-3 - Chequamegon Formation Modal Analyses. 187 VH Appendix C-4 - Converted QFL and QmFL Percentages from Myers (1971b). 189 Appendix C-5 - Pore space variance. 190 Appendix D - Heavy Mineral Modal Analyses. 191 Appendix E. Paleocurrent Rose Plots. 192 Appendix F. Sand Point Geologic Well Log. 200 Appendix G. Sand Point Well modal analyses. 202 Vlll List of Figures 1 Stratigraphic column for Middle Proterozoic rocks of the Midcontinent Rift System in the Lake Superior region. 1 2 QFL diagram of Oronto and Bayfield Groups showing compositional maturity. 3 3 Basement tectonic provinces in the North American midcontinent. 7 4 Geologic map of the Midcontinent Rift System, showing the Bayfield basin and study area. 8 5 Schematic geologic interpretation of seismic profiles across axis of Midcontinent Rift System, offshore Lake Superior. 18 6 Interpreted reflection profile along line C (shown on Figure 4). 19 7 Geologic map of the Midcontinent Rift System. 20 8 Suggested Apparent Polar Wander path from 1500 to 800 Ma. 22 9 Strikes and dips of Bayfield Group strata. 37 10 Classification of sandstones. 63 11 Orienta Formation QmFLt plot of 18 modal analyses. 69 12 Orienta Formation QFL plot of 18 modal analyses. 70 13 Devils Island Sandstone QmFLt plot of 41 modal analyses. _____ 71 14 Devils Island Sandstone QFL plot of 41 modal analyses. 72 15 Chequamegon Formation QmFLt plot of 17 modal analyses. 73 16 Chequamegon Formation QFL plot of 17 modal analyses. 74 17 Bayfield Group mean modes, QmFLt. 76 18 Bayfield Group mean modes, QFL. 77 19 Outcrop locations for heavy mineral analysis. 79 20 Sketch map of the Middle River at Moonshine Road outcrop area. 94 21 QmFLt diagram for Middle River Orienta samples. 95 lX 22 Structure section on steeply dipping Middle River beds. 96 23 Map of Devils Island showing samples from location 110. 99 24 QmFLt diagram for Devils Island Sandstone, location 1 lOD. 100 25 Sketch map of Sand Island. 103 26 QmFLt diagram for Devils Island Sandstone (location 117). 104 27 Percentages of quartz and lithics in Sand Point well. 109 28 Percentages of feldspar in Sand Point well. 110 29 Maps showing paleocurrent trends in pre-volcanic quartz, interflow sandstones, Oronto Group, and Bayfield Group. 116 30 Paleocurrent directions for Orienta Formation. 120 31 Paleocurrent directions for Devils Island Sandstone. 121 32 Paleocurrent directions for Chequamegon Formation. 122 33 Compositional plots of key sandstone suites. 125 34 The eight basic architectural elements in fluvial deposits. 132 35 Sketch map of how the Midcontinent Rift System may have appeared during Keweenawan sedimentation. 136 36 Sketch map of Northwestern Wisconsin showing the location of brownstone quarries and seacaves. 141 37 A cross section depicting the Devils Island Sandstone as the core of a syncline. 143 38 A cross section depicting the Devils Island Sandstone deposited adjacent to a small-throw fault. 144 39 Sketch of a cross section of the Bayfield Group showing a theoretical depositional pattern for the sediments. 147 x List of Plates Plate ·1 - Orienta Formation 26 A. Large cross-bed sets within the Orienta Formation at Amnicon Falls, location 4. B. Ripple marks in the Orienta Formation at Copper Creek, location 17. Plate 2 - Orienta Formation 27 A. Trough cross-bedding in the Orienta Formation at Copper Creek, location 14. B. Steeply dipping beds of Orienta Formation on Middle River and Moonshine Road, location 33. Plate 3 - Devils Island Sandstone 30 A. Ripple marks and mudcracks on the same bed, Devils Island Sandstone, Devils Island, location 11 OM2. B. Mudcracks in the Devils Island Sandstone, Devils Island, location 1 lOPl. Plate 4 - Devils Island Sandstone 31 Cross-bedding in Devils Island Sandstone, Devils Island, location 11 OAl. Plate 5 - Devils Island Sandstone 32 Seacaves of Devils Island Sandstone, Devils Island, location 11 OS. Plate 6 - Chequamegon Formation 34 A. Channel in the Chequamegon Formation, Hermit Island. B. Large lensoid massive bodies (channels?) on North Twin Island. Plate 7 - 46 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Orienta Formation. Plate 8 - 47 Photomicrograph of sandsone - Orienta Formation. Xl Plate 9 - 49 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Devils Island Sandstone. Plate 10 - 50 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Devils Island Sandstone. Plate 11 - 51 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Devils Island Sandstone. Plate 12 - 53 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Chequamegon Formation. Plate 13 - 54 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Chequamegon Formation. Plate 14 - 61 Photomicrograph of sandstone - Orienta Formation. Plate 15 - 62 Photomicrograph
Recommended publications
  • Potential Capacity for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the Midcontinent Rift System in Minnesota
    MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Harvey Thorleifson, Director POTENTIAL CAPACITY FOR GEOLOGIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM IN MINNESOTA L. Harvey Thorleifson, Minnesota Geological Survey, Editor A report prepared in fulfillment of the requirements of Minnesota Legislative Session 85 Bill S. F. 2096 Minnesota Geological Survey Open File Report OFR-08-01 University of Minnesota Saint Paul – 2008 Cover figure credit: Iowa Geological Survey 2 POTENTIAL CAPACITY FOR GEOLOGIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE MIDCONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM IN MINNESOTA 3 This open file is accessible from the web site of the Minnesota Geological Survey (http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/) as a PDF file readable with Acrobat Reader. Date of release: 24 January 2008 Recommended citation Thorleifson, L. H., ed., 2008, Potential capacity for geologic carbon sequestration in the Midcontinent Rift System in Minnesota, Minnesota Geological Survey Open File Report OFR-08-01, 138 p Minnesota Geological Survey 2642 University Ave West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114-1057 Telephone: 612-627-4780 Fax: 612-627-4778 Email address: [email protected] Web site: http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/ ©2008 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. 4 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY L. H. Thorleifson . 7 INTRODUCTION L. H. Thorleifson . 11 CLIMATE CHANGE L. H. Thorleifson . 11 Introduction . 11 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) .
    [Show full text]
  • A Field and Petrographic Study of the Freda
    A FIELD AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE FREDA FORMATION ALONG THE MONTREAL RIVER, GOGEBIC COUNTY, MICHIGAN fey GORDON R. SMALE A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 1958 ProQuest Number: 10008738 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10008738 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 A FIELD AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE FREDA FORMATION ALONG THE MONTREAL RIVER, GOGEBIC COUNTY, MICHIGAN •"by Gordon R „ Smal'e ABSTRACT The Montreal River provides a geographic boundary between Wisconsin and Michigan on the south shore of Lake Superior. A geologic study, both field and laboratory, was made of the 12,000 foot thickness of steeply dipping Freda for­ mation exposed along this river. The field study Includes mapping of sedimentary structures In an effort to determine the dominant current directions during deposition of the formation. Pebble and quartz grain orientation as well as heavy mineral and rock composition analyses were made In the laboratory to supplement the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakehore Geologic Resources Inventory
    Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Division Prepared by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich National Park Service August 7, 2010 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a geologic resources inventory report. The purpose of scoping is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and monitoring and research needs. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The National Park Service held a GRI scoping meeting for Apostle Islands National Lakeshore on July 20-21, 2010 both out in the field on a boating site visit from Bayfield, Wisconsin, and at the headquarters building for the Great Lakes Network in Ashland, Wisconsin. Jim Chappell (Colorado State University [CSU]) facilitated the discussion of map coverage and Bruce Heise (NPS-GRD) led the discussion regarding geologic processes and features at the park. Dick Ojakangas from the University of Minnesota at Duluth and Laurel Woodruff from the U.S. Geological Survey presented brief geologic overviews of the park and surrounding area. Participants at the meeting included NPS staff from the park and Geologic Resources Division; geologists from the University of Minnesota at Duluth, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, and U.S. Geological Survey; and cooperators from Colorado State University (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 ON THIS PAGE An opening in an ice-fringed sea cave reveals ice flows on Lake Superior. Photograph by Neil Howk (National Park Service) taken in winter 2008. ON THE COVER Wind and associated wave activity created a window in Devils Island Sandstone at Devils Island. Photograph by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich (Colorado State University) taken in summer 2010. Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 May 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • OLA Geopark Rock Specimens
    OLA GeoPark Rock Specimens A. Compeau Creek Gneiss Type: Metamorphosed intrusive igneous rock Description: An intrusive igneous rock that has been metamorphosed to varying degrees. This rock unit is evident north of Marquette in the vicinity of Sugarloaf Mountain, and in the Republic area along portions of highway M 95. Minerals: Quartz, orthoclase feldspar, amphibole Age: Approx. 2.7 billion years B. Gabbro (unknown rock unit name) Type: Intrusive igneous rock Description: Dark colored, medium-grained igneous rock. Gabbro is the intrusive chemical equivalent of basalt. (Basalt is an extrusive igneous rock commonly erupted from volcanoes.) Minerals: Plagioclase feldspar, augite (a clinopyroxene), olivine Age: Unknown for this sample C. Konna Dolomite Type: Metamorphosed sedimentary rock Description: Calcareous sediments containing magnesium, deposited in mid-depth ocean waters, that were later metamorphosed to become dolostone. The Kona varies from being thinly bedded to massive, and some horizons contain stromatolites—fossilized mounds of algae. Portions of the Kona have been silicified (replaced with quartz). Minerals: Dolomite (CaMgCO3) Age: Approximately 2.3 billion years D. Red Granite Type: Intrusive igneous rock (unknown rock unit name) Description: Red granite has a reddish/pinkish hue in part because of the presence of the alkali feldspars microcline and orthoclase. Granite is typically massive, meaning that it does not have layering, bedding, or preferred mineral orientation. Minerals: Quartz, alkali feldspar, and trace amounts of amphibole and/or mica Age: Unknown for this sample E. Gabbro Type: Intrusive igneous Description: This specimen from the Eagle Mine contains low grade sulfide ore deposits. It was deposited as a sill where rising magma exploited weaknesses in pre-existing formation.
    [Show full text]
  • G-012011-1E Geological Precambrian Timeline Midwest
    Copper Harbor Conglomerate Gunflint Formation: Breccia with white quartz Precambrian Geologic Events in the Mid-Continent of North America G-012011-1E 1 inch (Century Mine, Upper Peninsula MI) (Sibley Peninsula, Thunder Bay, ON) Compiled by: Steven D.J. Baumann, Alexandra B. Cory, Micaela M. Krol, Elisa J. Piispa Updated March 2013 Oldest known rock showing a dipole magnetic field: red dacite in Austrailia Paleomagnetic Line 3,800 3,700 3,600 3,500 3,400 3,300 3,200 3,100 3,000 2,900 2,800 2,700 2,600 2,500 2,400 2,300 2,200 2,100 2,000 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 Paleozoic Period Siderian Rhyacian Orosirian Statherian Calymmian Ectasian Stenian Tonian Cryogenian Ediacaran Eoarchean Paleoarchean Mesoarchean Neoarchean Era Paleoproterozoic Mesoproterozoic Neoproterozoic Eon Archean Proterozoic Pass Lake Kama Hill Sibley Group Sediments (Sibley Basin, Thunder Bay Area, ON) McGrath Gneiss McGrath Complex (EC MN) Metamorphic and cataclastic event Formation Formation Outan Island Formation Nipigon Formation Recent Era of Great Mid-continent Basin Formation (MI, IL, IA, IN, KY, MO) 2 inches Marshfield Archean Gneiss (C WI) Linwood Archean Migmatite (C WI) Sudbury Dike Swarm (SE ON) Quinnesec Formation Intrusions (NE WI) Quinnesec Formation Metamorphism (NE WI) Hatfield Gneiss (WC WI) Pre-Quinnesec Formations deposited (NE WI) Upper Rove Formation Baraboo Quartzite LEGEND (Sibley Peninsula, Thunder Bay, ON) Gray granodioritic phase Montevideo Gneiss (SW MN) Red granite phase Montevideo Gneiss
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Stratigraphic Nomenclature for Wisconsin (Wisconsin
    UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Information Circular Number 8 Paleozoic Stratigraphic Nomenclature For Wisconsin By Meredith E. Ostrom"'" INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic stratigraphic nomenclature shown in the Oronto a Precambrian age and selected the basal contact column is a part of a broad program of the Wisconsin at the top of the uppermost volcanic bed. It is now known Geological and Natural History Survey to re-examine the that the Oronto is unconformable with older rocks in some Paleozoic rocks of Wisconsin and is a response to the needs areas as for example at Fond du Lac, Minnesota, where of geologists, hydrologists and the mineral industry. The the Outer Conglomerate and Nonesuch Shale are missing column was preceded by studies of pre-Cincinnatian cyclical and the younger Freda Sandstone rests on the Thompson sedimentation in the upper Mississippi valley area (Ostrom, Slate (Raasch, 1950; Goldich et ai, 1961). An unconformity 1964), Cambro-Ordovician stratigraphy of southwestern at the upper contact in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan Wisconsin (Ostrom, 1965) and Cambrian stratigraphy in has been postulated by Hamblin (1961) and in northwestern western Wisconsin (Ostrom, 1966). Wisconsin wlle're Atwater and Clement (1935) describe un­ A major problem of correlation is the tracing of outcrop conformities between flat-lying quartz sandstone (either formations into the subsurface. Outcrop definitions of Mt. Simon, Bayfield, or Hinckley) and older westward formations based chiefly on paleontology can rarely, if dipping Keweenawan volcanics and arkosic sandstone. ever, be extended into the subsurface of Wisconsin because From the above data it would appear that arkosic fossils are usually scarce or absent and their fragments cari rocks of the Oronto Group are unconformable with both seldom be recognized in drill cuttings.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Midcontinent Rift Magmatism and the Paleogeography of Laurentia
    THEMED ISSUE: Tectonics at the Micro- to Macroscale: Contributions in Honor of the University of Michigan Structure-Tectonics Research Group of Ben van der Pluijm and Rob Van der Voo The end of Midcontinent Rift magmatism and the paleogeography of Laurentia Luke M. Fairchild1, Nicholas L. Swanson-Hysell1, Jahandar Ramezani2, Courtney J. Sprain1, and Samuel A. Bowring2 1DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720, USA 2DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139, USA ABSTRACT Paleomagnetism of the North American Midcontinent Rift provides a robust paleogeographic record of Laurentia (cratonic North America) from ca. 1110 to 1070 Ma, revealing rapid equatorward motion of the continent throughout rift magmatism. Existing age and paleomagnetic constraints on the youngest rift volcanic and sedimentary rocks have been interpreted to record a slowdown of this motion as rifting waned. We present new paleomagnetic and geochronologic data from the ca. 1090–1083 Ma “late-stage” rift volcanic rocks exposed as the Lake Shore Traps (Michigan), the Schroeder-Lutsen basalts (Minnesota), and the Michipicoten Island Formation (Ontario). The paleomagnetic data allow for the development of paleomagnetic poles for the Schroeder-Lutsen basalts (187.8°E, 27.1°N; A95 = 3.0°, N = 50) and the Michipicoten Island Formation (174.7°E, 17.0°N; A95 = 4.4°, N = 23). Temporal constraints on late-stage paleomagnetic poles are provided by high-precision, 206Pb-238U zircon dates from a Lake Shore Traps andesite (1085.57 ± 0.25 Ma; 2σ internal errors), a Michipicoten Island Formation tuff (1084.35 ± 0.20 Ma) and rhyolite (1083.52 ± 0.23 Ma), and a Silver Bay aplitic dike from the Beaver Bay Complex (1091.61 ± 0.14 Ma), which is overlain by the Schroeder-Lutsen basalt flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Concretions Or Fossils?
    PALAIOS, 2016, v. 31, 327–338 Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/palo.2016.013 MACROSCOPIC STRUCTURES IN THE 1.1 Ga CONTINENTAL COPPER HARBOR FORMATION: CONCRETIONS OR FOSSILS? 1 1 2 1 3 ROSS P. ANDERSON, LIDYA G. TARHAN, KATHERINE E. CUMMINGS, NOAH J. PLANAVSKY, AND MARCIA BJØRNERUD 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA 2Department of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA 3Geology Department, Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin 54911, USA email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Continental siltstones of the Mesoproterozoic Copper Harbor Formation, Michigan contain macroscopic structures of a size and morphological complexity commonly associated with fossils of eukaryotic macroorganisms. A biogenic origin for these structures would significantly augment the Proterozoic continental fossil record, which is currently poor, and also add to a growing body of sedimentological and geochemical data that, albeit indirectly, indicates the presence of life in continental settings early in Earth’s history. These three- dimensional structures occur abundantly within a single cm-scale siltstone bed. Along this bedding plane, these structures are generally circular-to-ovoid, range up to several centimeters in diameter, and most specimens possess a transecting lenticular element. Structures exhibit sharp, well-rounded external margins and, in contrast to the surrounding aluminosilicate-rich matrix, are calcitic in composition. Surrounding sedimentary laminae are deflected by and cross cut the structures. A fossiliferous origin is considered but rejected and an authigenic concretionary origin is favored based on these characters. However, a concretionary origin does not exclude the possibility of a biogenic precursor that served as a locus for early diagenetic calcite precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Massive Sulfide Occurrences in Wisconsin
    MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 79-2 , t STATUS REPORT THE MASSIVE SULFIDE OCCURRENCES IN WISCONSIN by M G Mudrey, Jr available from Geological and Natural History Su rvey University of Wisconsin-Extension 1815 University Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53706 MISCELLANEOUS PAPER ,79-2 STATUS REPORT THE MASSIVE SULFIDE OCCURRENCES IN WISCONSIN by M G. Mudrey, Jr available from Geological and Natural History Survey University of Wisconsin-Extension 1815 University Avenue Madison, Wisconsin 53706 STATUS REPORT - THE MASSIVE SULFIDE OCCURRENCES IN WISCONSIN by M. G. Mudrey, Jr.l Four volcanogenic massive sulfide ore bodies have been discovered in northern Wisconsin in the past ten years, only three of which have available geologic information. The deposits contain zinc, copper, and substantially lesser amounts of lead, silver and gold. The relations of these deposits to the volcanic country rock are only now beginning to be understood. Model-lead isotopic ages from the deposits indicate mineralization essentially coeval with volcanic deposition. The deposits are hydrothermally altered, and metamorphosed, but alteration pipes are not recognized. The largest find to date consists of 70 million tons of ore averaging 5 percent zinc and one percent copper. GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK Middle PI'ecamhrian rocks in northern Wisconsin consist of three main facies (Figure 1): a dominantly metasedimentary sequence including quar'tzites and conglomerates, carbonates, iI'on'�·formation, and slate; a volcanogenic' sequence of submarine flows, volcaniclastic material, and associated mafic intrusives; and a plutonic sequence dominantly of granitic to tonalitic batholiths (Table 1). MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS IN WISCONSIN Geology modIfied from Sims n076) lA'zC".::£j Granitic Rocks L,�d Metasedimentary Rocks Ed Metavolcanic Rocks Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Illustrations Table Introduction
    The Base of the Upper Keweenawan, ILLUSTRATIONS Michigan and Wisconsin FIGURE 1. Distribution of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate and included mafic lava members...........................................2 By WALTER S. WHITE 2. Stratigraphic section of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate..2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY 3. Longitudinal stratigraphic section of Keweenawan rocks below the base of the Nonesuch Shale............................3 4. Mean directions of magnetization for some Keweenawan GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1354-F rocks.. ..............................................................................6 A proposal to adopt the top of the Copper Harbor 5. Proposed nomenclature for middle and upper Keweenawan Conglomerate as the base of the upper Keweenawan in rocks ................................................................................9 the Lake Superior region TABLE TABLE 1. Compressional wave velocities (km/sec) for selected Keweenawan stratigraphic units, Lake Superior region ...7 ABSTRACT UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, The top of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate (base of WASHINGTON : 1972 Nonesuch Shale) is a more satisfactory boundary between upper and middle Keweenawan rocks in northern Michigan and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR adjacent parts of Wisconsin than the various horizons that ROGERS G. B. MORTON, Secretary have been used hitherto without stratigraphic consistency from GEOLOGICAL SURVEY place to place. Irving’s original boundary (1883) cannot be V. E. McKelvey, Director followed away from the Keweenaw Peninsula. The top of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate comes closer to marking the Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-75175 close of Keweenawan volcanism than other major boundaries and actually adheres more closely to Irving’s original concept For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office than the boundary that he himself chose.
    [Show full text]
  • Making It and Breaking It in the Midwest: Continental Assembly and Rifting from Modeling of Earthscope Magnetotelluric Data
    Precambrian Research 278 (2016) 337–361 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Precambrian Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/precamres Making it and breaking it in the Midwest: Continental assembly and rifting from modeling of EarthScope magnetotelluric data Paul A. Bedrosian United States Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA article info abstract Article history: A three-dimensional lithospheric-scale resistivity model of the North American mid-continent has been Received 23 September 2015 estimated based upon EarthScope magnetotelluric data. Details of the resistivity model are discussed in Revised 2 March 2016 relation to lithospheric sutures, defined primarily from aeromagnetic and geochronologic data, which Accepted 19 March 2016 record the southward growth of the Laurentian margin in the Proterozoic. The resistivity signature of Available online 25 March 2016 the 1.1 Ga Mid-continent Rift System is examined in detail, in particular as relates to rift geometry, extent, and segmentation. An unrecognized expanse of (concealed) Proterozoic deltaic deposits in Keywords: Kansas is identified and speculated to result from axial drainage along the southwest rift arm akin to Midcontinent rift the Rio Grande delta which drains multiple rift basins. A prominent conductor traces out Cambrian rifting Magnetotellurics Paleoproterozoic in Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, and Kentucky; this linear conductor has not been imaged before and Precambrian suggests that the Cambrian rift system may have been more extensive than previously thought. The high- Lithosphere est conductivity within the mid-continent is imaged in Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin where it is Suture zone coincident with Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks. The high conductivity is attributed to metallic sulfides, and in some cases, graphite.
    [Show full text]