DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY COUNCIL ~Gfnda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITY COUNCIL ~Gfnda CITY OF VENTURA CITY COUNCIL ~GfNDA Supplemental Information Packet Public Communications Received by 4:00 p.m., November 9, 2020. Meeting of November 9, 2020 Supplemental Information: Any agenda related public documents received and distributed to a majority of the City Council after the Agenda Packet is printed are included in Supplemental Packets. Supplemental Packets are produced as needed. The Supplemental Packet is available in the City Clerk's Office, 501 Pol i Street, Room 204, Ventura, during normal business hours as well as on the City's Website - www.cityofventura.ca.gov https://www.cityofventura.ca.gov/1236/City-Council-Public-Hearing-NoticesSuppl Ventura City Council Agenda www.cityofventura.ca.gov AGENDA ITEM 7 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS pc Antoinette Mann From: Patty Overley (personal) Sent: Thursday, October 29, 20 To: Matt Lavere; Cheryl Heitmann; Erik Nasarenko; Christy Weir; Sofia Rubalcava; Jim Friedman; Lorrie Brown; City Manager Internet Email; Jamie Peltier; Dara Sanders Cc: Glenn Overley Subject: -EXT- Haley Point (HP) proposed development concerns To whom it may concern, With COVID 19 upon us, this City's Development process, created by the city in an attempt to dea l with the non-face to face meetings is not working for me and many others who are not computer literate. To visit web-type meeting is not something I can do easily. I am sure many others are in the same boat as me. This process is not fa ir and has limited citizens from participating in city council meetings and government processes. There needs to be another process to make certain all residents in the affected area of Ha ley Point have an opportunity to state their position on this proposed project that will directly impact their day to day exposure to the project in a negative way. The city has an enormous amount of information.on file about the 2005 general plan and all the addendums and discussions that has occurred over the years, since 2005. To require a citizen to retain or research this information to make an intelligent statement regarding development or re-development withi n the city is impossible. From what I have read and learned from those that have shared their thoughts with me, the following statement contains my concerns about this proposed development. I am not opposed to development, but do not want to see a "plug and play" approach to fill in open parcels because of 5B330. This is not "planned development" it is "reactionary development" that will harm the look and feel of Ventura forever. It does not have to be that way. 1.) Medium density and high density development are both appropriate for fill in type development under certain circumstances, the Ha ley Point proposal " IS NOT ONE OF THOSE PARCELS". Other areas on major roadways like Main Street and Thompson are both more suitable for this type of development. They have immediate access to main roadways and do not use residential streets to ga in access to a development that does not fit the neighborhood. The Mid-Town Channel Drive Parcel is different than the parcels on Main Street and those on Thompson. What differs is the fact that Channel does not have DIRECT access to a major roadway. Instead, Haley Point (HP) will use residential streets to ga in access to Channel to enter the HP complex. If the railroad crossing at Seaward were still ground level, as it was when the HP parcels were originally zoned as Ml, then the complex would make since, as HP residents cou ld gain access from a main roadway (Seaward), similar to those parcels on Main and also on Thompson. The point is that the city wants to claim that this proposal follows the letter of the law and is in compliance with the amended General Plan for Ventura. The truth is the HP proposed development is not in the "spirit" of t he General Plan. I do not think anyone ever intended for multi-storied medium density development inside a predominately single story residential tract that was developed during the forties and fifties. This wi ll destroy the look and feel of t he neighborhood forever, if allowed. If you look at the homes on Porter, in the same tract, they are newer, but more compliant with the feel of the original neighborhood. The difference is they won't have the ocean views the HP project will have if they are al lowed to develop a parcel with multiple stori es. 2.) HP project by design will require huge amounts of water. This is water that the city has continua lly struggled to provide its existing customers. Th ink about it for a m inute. If the parcel as designed allows 72 units, that mean 150 or so (2 baths/2.5 baths) toilets being supplied with water. That means that sewage for these same toilets w ill also be moved from the complex, via a sewer trunk that was designed decades ago. Kitchen sinks (72), bathroom sinks (150+), washers (72), dish washers (72) and water for the HP landscape needs. That is a lot of water. The other potential issue is water pressure for existing customers in the neighborhood that could be affected. I have extreme low pressure and hard water now. What will adding 72 more (homes) users to an older (many decades old) water system do to existing customers water service? The quality of the water and low pressure is already an issue . Is it going to get better with more customers on the same supply lines? Is this a situation where the city is placing the cart in front of the horse? Are we going to try and fix this issue after the fact and then charge tax payers to fix the problem the city created with the developer? 3.) What are the environmental, public utilities and traffic issues associated with this potential HP project. Prior to any approval, will the city require environmental impact studies, traffic related studies, and soil contamination studies. Additionally will that city reach out to wildlife experts to determine any potential impact on wildlife as a result of the disruption to the current environment? I visited the site toda and was uickl reminded of how beautiful the view is and how well and stron the breeze is that comes from the beach up the mild bluff toward Channel Drive. This will forever be changed if developed as proposed by the HP developer. The ramifications of a decision like this should be made with eyes completely open and not be taken lightly. The property has been used for many years to complete automotive and oil drilling equipment repairs. The logical conclusion is that oil related products and asbestos, both listed as hazardous chemicals by the state of California, may be present on the site and may require mitigation prior to any development. The aforementioned studies should not be waived by the city. They should be an absolute requirement before any decision is made by the city. Along the utilities aspect of the proposed HP project. The main utilities (SCE) have power lines and poles on the railway side of the project. Consideration should be given to remove these poles and place utilities underground to improve the views and aesthetics of the project at a cost to the developer. Traffic studies will determine the impact of traffic moving in an out of the tract. Keep in mind, that although the HP proposed development are currently listed at 72 units, the fact is most homes have at least two vehicles per household. If any of these households have teenage children, add a car or two Realistically, the traffic study should consider at least 150 cars plus any vehicles for visitors. Then there is another component to add for delivery vehicles. Finally, how can an accurate traffic study be completed under COVID conditions? In conclusion, the point of any residential development within an in-fill situation should be to improve the area with development. This development as proposed does not appear to do that. It appears upon the surface, that much more still needs to be investigated by the city before a decision to approve a project like this can be rendered. I want to clearly state for the record that I am not against development, as long as it is right for the area . I would like to see this project scaled down. I see 8 condos per acre more appropriate for the space and surrounding complex's. I do not believe that block walls on Channel to separate the complex from the existing neighborhood is appropriate. Roadways in the complex should resemble the existing neighborhood. With more parking permitted in the complex. The units should be a mix of one and two story buildings. Three story height does not fit the neighborhood. Being on the bluff, makes it too visible as a three story unit. It is good for the developer, who will sell the units as coastal view properties at a premium cost. As proposed, it is not good for the neighborhood. The studies I mentioned protect the city and the neighborhood from issue in the future and should be required. That area was initially designed (historically from the 40's and S0's) to allow for light industrial, with traffic flowing off of Seaward, when the roadway still crossed over the railway tracks at road level. Now with many years passed, it is important to investigate all the impacts that maybe at play. This includes traffic related issues and any environmental components that have been created on the subject property from its use as a Ml zoned property, actively involved in industries that have used dangerous chemicals over the years, prior to the state knowing their danger.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stingray-Boats-2014-Model-Brochure
    ABOUT STINGRAY Based in Hartsville, South Carolina, Stingray occupies 3-5 About Stingray Technology over 225,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities and Z-Plane Hull is situated on 46 acres. 6 Warranty Environment Stingray is a privately held, family-owned business, 8-19 Sport Boats representing one of the longest continual ownerships in 8-9 180RX Sport Boat the marine industry today! Stingray has been building 10-11 191RX Sport Boat 12-13 198LE/LF Sport Boat quality runabouts since 1979 based on some very basic 14-15 225LR Sport Boat 16-17 225SX Sport Boat principles: innovation, craftsmanship, and integrity. 18-19 250LR Sport Boat Because of our “independent” status, Stingray can 20-35 Sport Decks react to changing market conditions in a much shorter 20-21 194LE/LF/LX Sport Deck cycle time than the larger corporate entities. This often 22-23 198LX Sport Deck 24-25 204LR Sport Deck Outboard leads to early recognition of shifts in consumer trends or 26-27 208LR Sport Deck demographics and thus designing products to meet those 28-29 214LR Sport Deck Outboard 30-31 215LR Sport Deck needs in a more proactive way. 32-33 234LR Sport Deck Outboard 34-35 235LR Sport Deck Stingray leads the industry with many technological 36-37 Deck Boat firsts. In 1985, Stingray was the first boat company to use 36-37 212SC Deck Boat CAD-driven CNC routers to produce production parts. In 38-49 Cuddies / Cruiser 1993, Stingray introduced the first 5-axis CNC waterjet 38-39 208CR Sport Deck Cuddy 40-41 215CR Sport Deck Cuddy designed to trim fiberglass parts, followed in 1996 by a 42-43 225CR Cuddy 44-45 235CR Sport Deck Cuddy CNC flatbed waterjet for cutting flat goods.
    [Show full text]
  • “We're All in the Same Boat”: a Review of the Benefits of Dragon
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2012, Article ID 167651, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2012/167651 Review Article “We’re All in the Same Boat”: A Review of the Benefits of Dragon Boat Racing for Women Living with Breast Cancer Susan R. Harris Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3 Correspondence should be addressed to Susan R. Harris, [email protected] Received 18 November 2011; Revised 5 May 2012; Accepted 6 May 2012 Academic Editor: Tieraona Low Dog Copyright © 2012 Susan R. Harris. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This narrative review summarizes findings from quantitative and qualitative research literature that has been published over the past 15 years since an initial, community-based pilot study first challenged the long-held medical belief that vigorous, upper-body exercise would lead to lymphedema in women who were at risk due to treatments for breast cancer. Dragon boat racing originated in China more than 2000 years ago and has become a popular recreational and competitive support around the world. From the advent of the world’s first breast cancer survivor dragon boat team, Abreast in a Boat launched in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1996, there are now more than 140 breast cancer survivor dragon boat teams paddling and competing in 12 different countries. The wealth of quantitative and qualitative research that has ensued since that pilot study further supports the initial hypothesis that resistance exercise, for example, dragon boat paddling, is not only safe for women recovering from conventional breast cancer therapies but also shows that dragon boating has been embraced as a complementary exercise therapy by the cancer survivors participating in this magical sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelfth Sunday of the Year (2021) – June 20 “As Evening Drew On” (Mark 4:35)
    Twelfth Sunday of the Year (2021) – June 20 “As evening drew on” (Mark 4:35). “The Gospel passage we have just heard begins like this. For weeks now it has been evening. The darkness has gathered over our squares, our streets and our cities; it has taken over our lives, filling everything with a deafening silence and a distressing void, that stops everything as it passes by; we feel it in the air, we notice it in people’s gestures, their glances give them away. We find ourselves afraid and lost. Like the disciples in the Gospel we were caught off guard by an unexpected, turbulent storm. We have realized that we are on the same boat, all of us fragile and disorientated, but at the same time important and needed, all of us called to row together, each of us in need of comforting the other. On this boat are all of us. Just like those disciples, who spoke anxiously with one voice, saying “we are perishing” (v.38), so we too have realized that we cannot go on thinking about ourselves, but only together can we do this.” With these words Pope Francis led the world in a most extraordinary moment of prayer on Friday, March 27th, 2020, in a dark, empty and rain swept St. Peter’s Square in Rome as the world was embraced in a lockdown. For his reflection he used today’s Gospel, with the disciples questioning Jesus as to whether or not he cares they are perishing, sinking, losing control of their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Seamanship in Traditional Utility Boats Responsibility - Competence -Safety - Training
    Good seamanship in traditional utility boats responsibility - competence -safety - training The Coast Association's Captain's committee (Forbundet Kystens Høvedsmannsutvalg) Foreword Good seamanship used to be something one grew into by li ving everyday life on an exposed coast. At the same time, it was something one needed to shive to develop in play with a boat, weather and shipmates. Now there has been a break in the transmission ofknowledge, procedures and abilities. Not everyone "knows what they are doing." Mistakes and accidents tend to lead to a demand for close regulation of details and formalized training. Within the coastal culture movement, we rather believe in raising awareness of the captain's responsibility and of the competences and abilities that must be acquired through practice. This is not a textbook on sailing utility boats, and neither is it a curriculum for captains­ to-be. It is a contribution to the work being done with traditional utility boats. We want to invite those interested to participate in a discussion of what good seamanship in traditional uti! i ty boats means. We wish to contribute to a discussion of what competence it would be reasonable to require of a captain. We want to identify some of the basic procedures that in a concentrated form contain hundreds of years of experience with these boats. We want to present a blueprint for how one can conduct systematic training and development of knowledge and abilities related to the use of the boats. The Coast Association's national conference in Kabelvåg, July/August 1998 Captain's committee (Høvedmannsutvalget) Jon Bojer Godal, Wiggo S.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Fleet: an Ebbtide of Shrimp Boats on the San Sebastian River
    Florida’s Fleet: An Ebbtide of Shrimp Boats on the San Sebastian River By Brendan Burke Lighthouse Archaeological Maritime Program (LAMP) St. Augustine, Florida December 20091 This paper focuses on a relatively recent part of St. Augustine’s history, one that had global implications and formed a central component of the town’s economy for almost half a century. Shrimp boat building was a major industry during the 20th century on the city’s waterfront and between 1943-1985 almost three thousand, if not more, shrimp boats were launched by local builders. The types of builder ranged from single individuals operating on rented property to corporate boat factories capable of mass- producing trawlers at rates usually seen only during wartime. Labor pattern shifts concurrent with changes in production can be seen as boatbuilding systems in St. Augustine, and elsewhere, move towards to commodify labor and, arguably, the skilled craftsmanship of the individual or family builder is lost. The St. Augustine example, like other towns engaged in hull-specific boatbuilding, such as Mystic, Connecticut and their 1 Paper presented at the 61st annual meeting of the Florida Anthropological Society, Pensacola, Florida, May 8-9, 2009. “half-clipper”, saw a change in technology and labor patterns that changed the face of the waterfront and the people working there. Three examples of shrimp boat building yards are used here to illustrate this transition. The first is a small family owned business building few boats but providing all of the labor and skills themselves. The second is a family owned business but utilizing wage laborers to supplement and expand the abilities of the yard to produce boats in production style.
    [Show full text]
  • SERMONS “IN the SAME BOAT” Scripture Lessons: Mark 4:35-42; Ephesians 2:13-22 This Sermon Was Preached by Dr
    FIRST (SCOTS) SERMONS “IN THE SAME BOAT” Scripture Lessons: Mark 4:35-42; Ephesians 2:13-22 This sermon was preached by Dr. Joseph S. Harvard III on Sunday, August 16, 2015 at First (Scots) Presbyterian Church in Charleston, South Carolina. Maybe you heard about the preacher who stood up to preach, and he said, “Before I begin my sermon I have something important to say." Before I begin I want to express my deep gratitude to the Search Committee that called me here and the Session who called me to serve as Transitional Pastor for this congregation. Carlisle and I are honored to be joining you on this journey of faith. I have long admired this congregation for your witness to the Gospel in this historic city. Phil Noble is a mentor and long-time friend. I join you in admiration and gratitude for the ministry of Danny Massie and Tita Massie. I am aware this is a significant time of transition and I am looking forward to making the journey with you and working with excellent colleagues. Carlisle and I are so glad to be joining you and we solicit your prayers and your support. As I was considering my call to serve with you, I have been pondering this story about Jesus stilling the storm. In the story, Jesus invites the disciples into the boat. Jesus says, “Let us go to the other side.” Jesus takes the initiative. Have you noticed how it works that way for us? I was not looking for a church to serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Fall 2000 Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent Guyora Binder University at Buffalo School of Law Nicholas J. Smith University of New Hampshire Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Guyora Binder & Nicholas J. Smith, Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent, 32 Rutgers L.J. 115 (2000). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/285 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FRAMED: UTILITARIANISM AND PUNISHMENT OF THE INNOCENT GuyoraBinder*andNicholas J. Smith" I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................116 II. THE DEBATE OVER PUNISHING THE INNOCENT ...................123................. A. The Charge...................................................................................123 B. Five Responses .............................................................................127 1. Acceptance ...............................................................................127
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Sermon This Morning Is a Continuation of a Sermon Series Entitled, “Navigating the Storm—How to Journey in Faith Throu
    1 The sermon this morning is a continuation of a sermon series entitled, “Navigating the Storm—How to Journey in Faith through Troubling Times.” There are a number of Biblical stories which unfold on boats that are in the midst of storms; the stories are not only dramatic in their own right, but they tell us a good deal about how to journey through the storms that we encounter in our world today. This morning we are looking at two very memorable accounts from the gospels which took place in a boat on the Sea of Galilee. Let us begin with a moment of prayer . In the Scripture we heard this morning from Mark chapter four, we are told of how the disciples along with Jesus were on a boat crossing the Sea of Galilee, when a storm blew up. The Sea of Galilee is a large freshwater lake, about seven miles wide on average by twenty miles long, and it can become quite rough in a storm. A small boat a few miles from shore in a big storm could get in very serious trouble. Mark gives us a good description of what was happening: "A great windstorm arose, and the waves beat into the boat, so that the boat was being swamped." [Mar 4:37] I've been out sailing with my kids in big wind and waves, and when water starts coming in over the side of the boat it is a bit unsettling. The disciples were in an ancient wooden craft with limited maneuvering ability, and they were in a raging storm on a big lake at night—our passage says that they had departed from shore in the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Huber
    rwgmaMeLIg To Be Deter- Mined kartaMgBiBN’BIRbeTskm<úCa An Exhibition from Cambodia The International Tour 2008 The UN Palais de Nations, Geneva, Switzerland 2009 - 2014 Germany, Kosovo, Slovakia, UK, Ireland, USA, Thailand, Australia A United Nations resolution declared 2005 as the International Year for Sports and Physical Education. It called for governments and international sports bodies to assist developing countries in building sports capacity owing to sport’s ability to foster values essential to social cohesion and intercultural dialogue. Sport, particularly the formation of athletic infrastructures such The Issue as the CNVLD’s league, has been recognised for making a huge contribution to economic and social development. Following the surprise success of the Cambodian National Team’s Silver medal in the 1999 Bangkok FESPIC games, history was made in Sydney 2000 when the first-ever Cambodian national team to participate in the Paralympics managed to defeat the host nation, Australia. Sport’s ability to facilitate intercultural dialogue was beautifully illustrated when the Cambodian The legacy of the landmine lives on in Cambodia. Between 2 and 3 million mines remain scattered across the Cambodian team quickly became the media stars of the entire Paralympic games. The CNVLD subsequently set their objective to countryside and cause up to 1,000 civilian casualties per year. This has given Cambodia the dubious distinction of having become the top-ranked disabled volleyball team in the world. the worldís highest percentage of amputees per capita. Over 70 percent of the disabled athletes who participate in the Cambodian National Volleyball League (Disabled) (CNVLD) are landmine survivors. The Cambodian squad has gone on to compete in the 2001 World Organisation of Volleyball Disabled (WOVD) World Cup in Slovakia, FESPIC in Korea 2002, and the WOVD World Cups in Greece (2003) and Canada (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Tin Foil Boat Challenge
    Tin Foil Boat Challenge Have you ever wondered how a ship made of steel can float? Or better yet, how can a steel ship carry a heavy load without sinking? In this project you will make boats out of aluminum foil to investigate how their size and shape affects how much weight they can carry. The Background Information: The science behind floating was first studied by an ancient Greek scientist named Archimedes. He figured out that when an object is placed in water, it pushes enough water out of the way to make room for itself. This is called displacement. Have you ever experienced displacement? Of course, you have! Remember the last time you got into the bathtub and the water level went up? That's displacement. When you got into the tub, water got out of your way to make room for you, so the water level in the tub got higher. When an object enters water, two forces act upon it. There's a downward force (gravity) that's determined by the object's weight. There's also an upward force (buoyancy) that's determined by the weight of the water displaced by the object. An object will float if the gravitational force is less than the buoyancy force. So, in other words, an object will float if it weighs less than the amount of water it displaces. This explains why a rock will sink while a huge boat will float. The rock is heavy, but it displaces only a little water. It sinks because its weight is greater than the weight of the small amount of water it displaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Not in the Same Boat
    NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS NEW ECONOMICS FOUNDATION NOT IN THE SAME BOAT THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BREXIT ACROSS UK FISHING FLEETS CONTENTS SUMMARY 2 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 8 SECTION 2: THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT FOR UK FISHING FLEETS 10 2.1 BREXIT WILL FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 10 2.2 THE POLITICAL REALITIES OF BREXIT 13 2.3 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN ACCESS TO WATERS (MODELLED) 17 2.4 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN QUOTA (MODELLED) 22 2.5 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN QUOTA SETTING AND OVERFISHING (MODELLED) 26 2.6 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGE IN TARIFFS TO ACCESS THE EU MARKET (MODELLED) 29 2.7 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES TO NON-TARIFF BARRIERS TO TRADE (MODELLED) 30 2.8 BREXIT IMPACT: MACROECONOMIC CHANGE (NOT MODELLED) 30 2.9 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES IN THE FREE MOVEMENT OF EU LABOUR (NOT MODELLED) 34 2.10 BREXIT IMPACT: CHANGES IN FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT (NOT MODELLED) 35 2.11 BREXIT IMPACT: REGULATORY CHANGE (NOT MODELLED) 36 2.12 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL FACTORS AFFECTING UK FISHERIES POST BREXIT 39 SECTION 3: COMBINING BREXIT SCENARIOS 41 3.1 MAIN SCENARIOS 41 3.2 WHY AN ECONOMIC SCENARIO ANALYSIS IS NECESSARY 44 3.3 THE DIVERSITY OF THE UK FLEET REQUIRES DISAGGREGATED ANALYSIS 45 SECTION 4: RESULTS 48 4.1 RESULTS 48 4.2 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 55 4.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 60 SECTION 5: DISCUSSION 65 5.1 UNDERSTANDING THE RESULTS IN THE CONTEXT OF ENTHUSIASTIC INDUSTRY SENTIMENT FOR BREXIT 65 5.2 COULD OVERFISHING REALLY HAPPEN HERE? 69 SECTION 6: POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 71 SECTION 7: CONCLUSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Benefits of Dragon Boat Racing for Women Living With
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2012, Article ID 167651, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2012/167651 Review Article “We’re All in the Same Boat”: A Review of the Benefits of Dragon Boat Racing for Women Living with Breast Cancer Susan R. Harris Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3 Correspondence should be addressed to Susan R. Harris, [email protected] Received 18 November 2011; Revised 5 May 2012; Accepted 6 May 2012 Academic Editor: Tieraona Low Dog Copyright © 2012 Susan R. Harris. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This narrative review summarizes findings from quantitative and qualitative research literature that has been published over the past 15 years since an initial, community-based pilot study first challenged the long-held medical belief that vigorous, upper-body exercise would lead to lymphedema in women who were at risk due to treatments for breast cancer. Dragon boat racing originated in China more than 2000 years ago and has become a popular recreational and competitive support around the world. From the advent of the world’s first breast cancer survivor dragon boat team, Abreast in a Boat launched in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1996, there are now more than 140 breast cancer survivor dragon boat teams paddling and competing in 12 different countries. The wealth of quantitative and qualitative research that has ensued since that pilot study further supports the initial hypothesis that resistance exercise, for example, dragon boat paddling, is not only safe for women recovering from conventional breast cancer therapies but also shows that dragon boating has been embraced as a complementary exercise therapy by the cancer survivors participating in this magical sport.
    [Show full text]