DOCSLIB.ORG

Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Fall 2000 Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent Guyora Binder University at Buffalo School of Law Nicholas J. Smith University of New Hampshire Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Guyora Binder & Nicholas J. Smith, Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent, 32 Rutgers L.J. 115 (2000). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/285 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FRAMED: UTILITARIANISM AND PUNISHMENT OF THE INNOCENT GuyoraBinder*andNicholas J. Smith" I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................116 II. THE DEBATE OVER PUNISHING THE INNOCENT ...................123................. A. The Charge...................................................................................123 B. Five Responses .............................................................................127 1. Acceptance ...............................................................................127 2. Definitional Evasion ................................................................128 3. Minimization ................................129........................................... (a) Punishment of Associates .................................................130 (b) Punishment Based on Low Standards of Proof.................131 (c) Preventive Incapacitation ..................................................132 (d) Framing the Innocent ........................................................132 (i) An Institution ...............................................................132 (ii) An Individual Act ........................................................135 4. Comparison ..............................................................................136 5. Restriction, or Rule Utilitarianism ..................137........................ C. The State of the Debate.................................................................139 III. BENTHAM ON PUNISHING THE INNOCENT ...........................................140 A. "Unavoidable Mis-Seated" Punishment......................................141 B. "Collective" Punishment..............................................................144 C. "Apparent"Punishment...............................................................148 D. PublicDeception.........................................................................151 IV. UTILITY AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE? .........................................................155 A. Utility in Bentham'sPredecessors...............................................156 1. Hume ........................................................................................156 2. Helvetius ..................................................................................159 3. Beccaria ...................................................................................162 • Professor of Law, State University of New York at Buffalo. Thanks are due to Barbara Fried, William Twining, Tom Grey, Richard Craswell, Mark Kelman, Joe Bankman, Amy Chua, David Mills, Bob Weisberg and other participants in the Stanford Law and Philosophy workshop, and to Pablo De Greiff, Markus Dubber, Louis Kaplow, Liam Murphy, Justin Schwartz and Jim Wooten for comments and suggestions. ** Law Clerk, Judge Nygaard, U.S.C.A. 3rd Cir.; J.D., Buffalo; Ph.D., Vanderbilt. Thanks are due to Nicole Smith for editorial advice. 115 RUTGERS LA W JOURNAL [Vol. 32:115 B. Bentham's Utility Principle.......................................................... 166 C. Bentham's InstitutionalAccount ofMorality............................... 168 V. UTILITY AS PROCESS AND DISCOURSE ................................................. 174 A. Security andProcedure.................................................................. 174 B. UtilitarianLanguagein the Policy Process................................. 176 1. Utilitarianism as a Rhetorical Project ...................................... 176 2. The Language of Law .............................................................. 178 3. The Language of Policy Reform ............................................. 182 VI. SECURITIES AGAINST MISRULE: LEGALITY, DEMOCRACY, PUBLICITY ........................................................................................... 184 A. Legality......................................................................................... 184 B. Democracy.................................................................................... 189 C. Publicity........................................................................................ 200 VII. INSTITUTIONAL UTILITARIANISM AND ETHICAL UTILITARIANISM ..... 210 A. UtilitarianismPenology asan Applicationof Institutional Utilitarianism................................................................................ 210 B. The Invention of Ethical Utilitarianism........................................ 214 C. The Revival ofInstitutionalUtilitarianism................................... 218 D. The BoundariesofInstitutionalUtilitarianism............................ 222 I. INTRODUCTION Utilitarian penology treats punishment as a costly instrument of public policy, permissible only when its benefits in reducing future crime outweigh the pain, fear, and public expense it imposes. According to utilitarian penology, therefore, the aim of maximizing welfare both justifies and limits the institution of punishment. While utilitarian penology has traditionally emphasized deterrence, reform and incapacitation as mechanisms by which punishment might reduce crime, it values any crime-inhibiting effect of punishment. Utilitarian penology also compares punishment to other policies which might achieve greater crime reductions at less social cost. Deterrence, for example might be most cost-effectively achieved by increasing the availability and benefits of lawful employment, or by technologies of law enforcement and urban design that increase the certainty of apprehension. Likewise, character reform might be better achieved by early education and by drug rehabilitation than by incarceration. Utilitarian penology has a distinguished history. Utilitarians such as Beccaria and Bentham championed such key reforms as the development of 20001 FRAMED: UTILITARIANISM AND PUNISHMENT police forces, comprehensive penal codes and penitentiaries, the abandonment of torture and corporal punishment, and reduced reliance upon capital punishment. Nevertheless, utilitarian penology has recently lost its luster, at least in the United States. The 1970's witnessed an explosion of retributivist thought among philosophers, legal scholars and publicists. Retributivists held that beneficial consequences provided neither a necessary nor a sufficient reason to punish, and that bad consequences provided neither a necessary nor a sufficient reason to refrain from punishing. Punishment could only be justified-and limited-by the moral desert of offenders. Retributivists participated in public debates over criminal justice policy, attacking probation, parole, indeterminate sentencing, rehabilitative programs, and determinist accounts of crime, whether invoked to excuse individuals I or to justify ameliorative social programs. 2 Retributivists promoted determinate sentencing and thereby contributed to the passage of the harsh federal sentencing guidelines. 3 Retribution was invoked by the Supreme Court as a constitutionally legitimate purpose of punishment in upholding the constitutionality of the death penalty.4 Retributivist attacks on utilitarian penology resonated with some sectors of the American public: retributive punishment bore witness to the inviolability and inflexibility of certain moral standards during an era of social change and cultural conflict. Increasing pessimism about the efficacy of government policy-particularly in influencing the behavior and life- chances of the poor-decreased public confidence that a combination of penal and social welfare measures could control crime. Popular perception painted urban centers as dangerous jungles in which anonymous offenders confronted little meaningful risk of apprehension, and were pathologically resistant to rational incentives. In the face of these public attitudes, criminal legislation seemed to shift from the domain of public policy to that of symbolic politics. 5 Rather than 1. Michael Moore, Causationandthe Excuses, 73 CAL. L. REV. 1091 (1985). 2. Stephen J. Morse, The Twilight of Welfare Criminology:A Reply to Judge Bazelon, 49 S. CAL. L. REV. 1247 (1976). 3. FRANCIS A. ALLEN, THE DECLINE OF THE REHABILITATIVE IDEAL: PENAL POLICY AND SOCIAL PURPOSE (1981); RICHARD SINGER, JUST DESERTS: SENTENCING BASED ON EQUALITY AND DESERT (1979); THE TWENTIETH CENTURY FUND TASK FORCE ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING, FAIR AND CERTAIN PUNISHMENT (1976); ANDREW VON HIRSCH, DOING JUSTICE: THE CHOICE OF PUNISHMENTS (1976). 4. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976). 5. Markus Dirk Dubber, Recidivist Statutes as Arational Punishment, 43 BUFF.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jurisprudence--Philosophy Or Science Henry Rottschaefer
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1927 Jurisprudence--Philosophy or Science Henry Rottschaefer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rottschaefer, Henry, "Jurisprudence--Philosophy or Science" (1927). Minnesota Law Review. 1465. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1465 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW Journal of the State Bar Association VOLUI%1E 11 MARCH, 1927 No. 4 JURISPRUDENCE- PHILOSOPHY OR SCIENCE By HENRY ROTTSCHAEFER* T WOULD perhaps be practically impossible to secure for any definition of the term Jurisprudence any very general accep- tance. It is doubtful whether there exists even any general agree- ment as to what subjects are within its scope. The problem of whether, and in what sense, it is to be considered philosophy or science, cannot, however, be discussed without adopting at least some tentative notion of its meaning that shall serve as the basis for the discussion. This can be more effectively done by a general description of the types of problem usually dealt with in treatises and courses on Jurisprudence than by framing a logically correct definition that secured accuracy and completeness by resort to a convenient vagueness. Investigation discloses its use to denote lines of inquiry having little in common other than a professed interest in general questions and problems concerning law and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Stingray-Boats-2014-Model-Brochure
    ABOUT STINGRAY Based in Hartsville, South Carolina, Stingray occupies 3-5 About Stingray Technology over 225,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities and Z-Plane Hull is situated on 46 acres. 6 Warranty Environment Stingray is a privately held, family-owned business, 8-19 Sport Boats representing one of the longest continual ownerships in 8-9 180RX Sport Boat the marine industry today! Stingray has been building 10-11 191RX Sport Boat 12-13 198LE/LF Sport Boat quality runabouts since 1979 based on some very basic 14-15 225LR Sport Boat 16-17 225SX Sport Boat principles: innovation, craftsmanship, and integrity. 18-19 250LR Sport Boat Because of our “independent” status, Stingray can 20-35 Sport Decks react to changing market conditions in a much shorter 20-21 194LE/LF/LX Sport Deck cycle time than the larger corporate entities. This often 22-23 198LX Sport Deck 24-25 204LR Sport Deck Outboard leads to early recognition of shifts in consumer trends or 26-27 208LR Sport Deck demographics and thus designing products to meet those 28-29 214LR Sport Deck Outboard 30-31 215LR Sport Deck needs in a more proactive way. 32-33 234LR Sport Deck Outboard 34-35 235LR Sport Deck Stingray leads the industry with many technological 36-37 Deck Boat firsts. In 1985, Stingray was the first boat company to use 36-37 212SC Deck Boat CAD-driven CNC routers to produce production parts. In 38-49 Cuddies / Cruiser 1993, Stingray introduced the first 5-axis CNC waterjet 38-39 208CR Sport Deck Cuddy 40-41 215CR Sport Deck Cuddy designed to trim fiberglass parts, followed in 1996 by a 42-43 225CR Cuddy 44-45 235CR Sport Deck Cuddy CNC flatbed waterjet for cutting flat goods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utilitarian Influence on American Legal Science in the Early Republic
    1 The Utilitarian Influence on American Legal Science in the Early Republic Steven J. Macias California Western School of Law [email protected] (rev. 9/8) In Utilitarian Jurisprudence in America, Peter King held up Thomas Cooper, David Hoffman, and Richard Hildreth, as those early American legal thinkers most notably influenced by Bentham.1 For King, Hildreth represented “the first real fruition of Benthamism in America,” whereas Cooper’s use of Bentham was subservient to his Southern ideology, and Hoffman’s use was mainly to “reinforce” a utilitarianism otherwise “derived from Paley.”2 Although Hildreth’s work falls outside the timeframe of early-American legal science, Cooper’s and Hoffman’s work falls squarely within it. What follows is, in part, a reevaluation of Cooper and Hoffman within the broader context of early republican jurisprudence. Because Cooper became an advocate of southern secession late in life, too many historians have dismissed his life’s work, which consisted of serious intellectual undertakings in law and philosophy, as well as medicine and chemistry. Hoffman, on the other hand, has become a man for all seasons among legal historians. His seven-year course of legal study contained such a vast and eclectic array of titles, that one can superficially paint Hoffman as advocating just about anything. As of late, Hoffman has been discussed as a leading exponent of Scottish Common Sense philosophy, second only to James Wilson a generation earlier. This tension between Hoffman-the-utilitarian and Hoffman-the-Scot requires a new examination. A fresh look at the utilitarian influence on American jurisprudence also requires that we acknowledge 1 PETER J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Firefighter's Walk to Christianity | Don Mcnea Fire School
    A Firefighter’s Walk to Christianity Enclosed you will find Bible verses that are pertinent to a firefighter’s walk to Christianity. Please feel free to download and print the 26 pages of this document. We all know that, as firefighters, we face more temptation than others may due to our time off. Therefore, our walk with the Lord needs to be stronger. We hope this will help you on a walk to Christianity. May God Bless You! This book is dedicated to the Reverend John Higginbotham, a mighty man of God, whose only desire in life was to be a blessing to anyone he came in contact with. The Ten Commandments 1. I am the LORD your God. You shall worship the Lord your God and Him only shall you serve. 2. You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain. 3. Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day. 4. Honor your father and your mother. 5. You shall not kill. 6. You shall not commit adultery. 7. You shall not steal. 8. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. 9. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife. 10. You shall not covet your neighbor's goods. 7 STEPS TO VICTORY 1. I know. 2. I believe 3. I’m persuaded. 4. He is able. 5. He keeps. 6. Committed. 7. Against that day. The Gospel According to Matthew Chapter 5 – The Beatitudes 3-12. Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are they who mourn, for they will be comforted.
    [Show full text]
  • [PDF] the WALKING DEAD VOL 8 MADE to SUFFER by AMAZON INC ~! [Pdf] the Walking Dead Vol 8 Made to Suffer
    ~! [PDF] THE WALKING DEAD VOL 8 MADE TO SUFFER by AMAZON INC ~! [PdF] The Walking Dead Vol 8 Made to Suffer. BOOK BY AMAZON INC. Choosing one thing to read, whether or not it is a novel, magazine, or comic book, could be emotional. All of us have read books that leave us breathless as we tell a buddy the plot. For kids, that emotion is escalated to the nth degree, due to the fact choosing just the ideal book is a declaration of independence as a reader and a commitment to a new journey. These articles offer invaluable ideas on all kinds of books, like getaway reads and everyones favorite-picture books. There are also guidelines to assist you pick multicultural books, which reflect RIF commitment to enhancing literacy by means of book distributions: By introducing young readers to new men and women and places, they will start to view equivalent human qualities that are popular bonds involving all people and find out the fantastic differences that distinguish a single culture from a different. This pages features details of The Walking Dead Vol 8 Made to Suffer, along with other about The Walking Dead Vol 8 Made to Suffer by Amazon Inc. To have additional information about the The Walking Dead Vol 8 Made to Suffer, please talk about the link listed below button and obtain the data file or have accessibility to additional information that are highly relevant to THE WALKING DEAD VOL 8 MADE TO SUFFER. READ: THE WALKING DEAD VOL 8 MADE TO SUFFER We are the number #1 books library that have many kind of different eBooks in our database lists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Jurisprudence: Liberty and Equality in Rawls and Dworkin
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 25 Number 2 Volume 25, Spring 1980, Number 2 Article 4 The Politics of Jurisprudence: Liberty and Equality in Rawls and Dworkin Stephen C. Hicks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Jurisprudence Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLITICS OF JURISPRUDENCE: LIBERTY AND EQUALITY IN RAWLS AND DWORKIN STEPHEN C. HICKS* Law as a general system of rules impartially applied acts as the me- dium of sovereign governmental order harmonizing the interests of indi- viduals and groups in society as equally and fairly as possible. The indi- vidual is free within the rules establishing security and order and is free from law which is not conducive to the general good. Similarly, an indi- vidual is free to pursue his own ends if they are compatible with the greatest happiness of the greatest number and also is free not to act on behalf of the common good. While these boundaries are defined by law, the actual social relations within them are the concern of ethics or psy- chology, not legislation.' Thus, political theory as utilitarianism sees the law according to its own representation of the good and its own descrip- tion of human nature. This is the original coordination of individual soci- ety and the body politic in our tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Loughlin Political Jurisprudence
    Martin Loughlin Political jurisprudence Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Loughlin, Martin (2016) Political jurisprudence. Jus Politicum: Revue de Droit Politique, 16 . ISSN 2101-8790 © 2016 Revue internationale de droit politique This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67311/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. POLITICAL JURISPRUDENCE MARTIN LOUGHLIN I: INTRODUCTION Political jurisprudence is a discipline that explains the way in which governmental authority is constituted. It flourished within European thought in the period between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries and since the twentieth century has been in decline. That decline, attributable mainly to an extending rationalization of life and thought, has led to governmental authority increasingly being expressed in technical terms. And because many of the implications of this development have been masked by the growth of an academic disciplinary specialization that sacrifices breadth of understanding for depth of knowledge, sustaining the discipline has proved difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Dostoevsky's Ideal
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2015 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul A. Eppler Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Philosophy Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Eppler, Paul A., "Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man" (2015). Student Publications. 395. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/395 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 395 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Abstract This paper aimed to provide a comprehensive examination of the "ideal" Dostoevsky human being. Through comparison of various characters and concepts found in his texts, a kenotic individual, one who is undifferentiated in their love for all of God's creation, was found to be the ultimate to which Dostoevsky believed man could ascend. Keywords Dostoevsky, Christianity, Kenoticism Disciplines Philosophy Comments This paper was written for Professor Vernon Cisney's course, PHIL 368: Reading- Dostoevsky, Fall 2015. This student research paper is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ student_scholarship/395 Dostoevsky’s Ideal Man Paul Eppler Professor Vernon Cisney Reading Dostoevsky I affirm that I have upheld the highest principles of honesty and integrity in my academic work and have not witnessed a violation of the Honor Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Ethics Anthropocentrism
    Environmental Ethics Anthropocentrism Introduction Anthropcentrism is the world view that places human beings as the center of the cosmos Five Interconnected Themes: 1) natural order has a grand hierarchy (a “Great Chain of Being) 2) the ontological divide between human and nonhuman nature 3) nature as a machine 4) only humans beings have intrinsic value/nature has only instrumental value 5) the moral community is limited to human beings Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) The Summa Contra Gentiles develops the ethical implications of the Great Chain of Being humans are closest to the likeness of God rational creatures exercise free will God bestows intrinsic value on rational creatures “Accordingly intellectual creatures are ruled by God, as though He cared for them for their own sake, while other creatures are ruled as being directed to rational creatures” (63) other creatures are slaves to their environment their actions casually determined by the environment thus human beings alone are morally considerable only human beings have freedom “he is free who is cause of himself . intellectual nature alone is free” human beings have the right to subjugate other beings below on the hierarchy “Hereby is refuted the error of those who said it is sinful for man to kill dumb animals: for by divine providence they are intended for man’s use in the natural order” (64) anticipating Kant, the only danger in killing dumb animals is that such behavior might lead to cruelty to human beings Francis Bacon (1561-1626) The Great Instauration focus of knowledge should be practical the improvement of the human condition knowledge is power over nature “the roads to human power and to human knowledge lie close together, and are nearly the same” this view of knowledge as power is stated more clearly in New Organon (1620) Title refers to Aristotle’s logical and methodological works known collectively as the Organon this will be a new organon, thus a new scientific method “Human knowledge and human power meet in one; for where the cause is not known the effect cannot be produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.The New Science of Moral Cognition: the State of The
    Anales de Psicología ISSN: 0212-9728 [email protected] Universidad de Murcia España Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio; Rosselló, Jaume The new science of moral cognition: the state of the art Anales de Psicología, vol. 30, núm. 3, septiembre-diciembre, 2014, pp. 1122-1128 Universidad de Murcia Murcia, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16731690011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative anales de psicología, 2014, vol. 30, nº 3 (octubre), 1122-1128 © Copyright 2014: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia. Murcia (España) http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.166551 ISSN edición impresa: 0212-9728. ISSN edición web (http://revistas.um.es/analesps): 1695-2294 The new science of moral cognition: the state of the art Antonio Olivera-La Rosa1,2* y Jaume Rosselló1,3 1 Human Evolution and Cognition Group (IFISC-CSIC), University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca (Spain) 2 Faculty of Psychology and Social Sciences. Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó, Medellín (Colombia) 3 Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca (Spain) Título: La nueva ciencia de la cognición moral: estado de la cuestión. Abstract: The need for multidisciplinary approaches to the scientific study Resumen: La necesidad de realizar aproximaciones multidisciplinares al of human nature is a widely supported academic claim. This assumption estudio de la naturaleza humana es ampliamente aceptada.
    [Show full text]
  • “We're All in the Same Boat”: a Review of the Benefits of Dragon
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2012, Article ID 167651, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2012/167651 Review Article “We’re All in the Same Boat”: A Review of the Benefits of Dragon Boat Racing for Women Living with Breast Cancer Susan R. Harris Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3 Correspondence should be addressed to Susan R. Harris, [email protected] Received 18 November 2011; Revised 5 May 2012; Accepted 6 May 2012 Academic Editor: Tieraona Low Dog Copyright © 2012 Susan R. Harris. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This narrative review summarizes findings from quantitative and qualitative research literature that has been published over the past 15 years since an initial, community-based pilot study first challenged the long-held medical belief that vigorous, upper-body exercise would lead to lymphedema in women who were at risk due to treatments for breast cancer. Dragon boat racing originated in China more than 2000 years ago and has become a popular recreational and competitive support around the world. From the advent of the world’s first breast cancer survivor dragon boat team, Abreast in a Boat launched in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1996, there are now more than 140 breast cancer survivor dragon boat teams paddling and competing in 12 different countries. The wealth of quantitative and qualitative research that has ensued since that pilot study further supports the initial hypothesis that resistance exercise, for example, dragon boat paddling, is not only safe for women recovering from conventional breast cancer therapies but also shows that dragon boating has been embraced as a complementary exercise therapy by the cancer survivors participating in this magical sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelfth Sunday of the Year (2021) – June 20 “As Evening Drew On” (Mark 4:35)
    Twelfth Sunday of the Year (2021) – June 20 “As evening drew on” (Mark 4:35). “The Gospel passage we have just heard begins like this. For weeks now it has been evening. The darkness has gathered over our squares, our streets and our cities; it has taken over our lives, filling everything with a deafening silence and a distressing void, that stops everything as it passes by; we feel it in the air, we notice it in people’s gestures, their glances give them away. We find ourselves afraid and lost. Like the disciples in the Gospel we were caught off guard by an unexpected, turbulent storm. We have realized that we are on the same boat, all of us fragile and disorientated, but at the same time important and needed, all of us called to row together, each of us in need of comforting the other. On this boat are all of us. Just like those disciples, who spoke anxiously with one voice, saying “we are perishing” (v.38), so we too have realized that we cannot go on thinking about ourselves, but only together can we do this.” With these words Pope Francis led the world in a most extraordinary moment of prayer on Friday, March 27th, 2020, in a dark, empty and rain swept St. Peter’s Square in Rome as the world was embraced in a lockdown. For his reflection he used today’s Gospel, with the disciples questioning Jesus as to whether or not he cares they are perishing, sinking, losing control of their lives.
    [Show full text]