Annex to Comments on the Additional Documentation (2014-09-08) for Planning Application P13/V2733/FUL Traffic and Transport Impacts – September 2014 Amendments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annex to Comments on the Additional Documentation (2014-09-08) for Planning Application P13/V2733/FUL Traffic and Transport Impacts – September 2014 Amendments West Way Community Concern – Annex to Comments on the Additional Documentation (2014-09-08) for Planning Application P13/V2733/FUL Traffic and transport Impacts – September 2014 amendments Top Line Flaws in the Transport Assessment (TA) submitted with the December 2013 Planning Application as a result of questions raised by Oxfordshire County Council (The Local Transport Authority) and the Highways Agency led to some fundamental changes being made to the design of the TA. But both Transport Assessments that have been produced for the proposed development are fundamentally flawed. Both underestimate the amount of traffic that will be associated with the development on local roads. Both produce very similar results, which happen to show levels of traffic that will not cause problems, but which show enough patronage to make the proposed centre viable. The amount of traffic that is forecast from the very local area is totally implausible (which has the effect of making traffic coming from a distance seem less). Given these two flawed Transport Assessments it is not credible that a sound assessment could be made which would show the development to not create traffic problems. Introduction Two Transport Assessments have now been undertaken using different methodologies, with the second claiming to address issues in the first. They both come to remarkably similar conclusions, but both have many flaws. This appears to point to a deliberate attempt to use complex models to confuse readers, and manipulating assumptions in order to produce results that show the proposal to be viable but not producing excessive traffic. Both have shown a serious lack of local knowledge, with the second merely addressing the most prominent issues raised by the County Council Highways Department and Highways Agency. That the two assessments are both implausible is further evidence that this proposal cannot work without large increases in traffic. Annex 1 contains a short guide to the traffic forecasting elements of a Transport Assessment. Further Annexes, each with a short summary, provide further explanation of the points made below. Comparison of the two West Way assessments This section compares the TA provided with the initial application with that provided in the September 2014 amendment. A sentence describes an aspect of the initial one, while the bullet point shows how it has been altered. (The initial TA) Used different estimates of traffic generated by the development to suit its arguments; • The new version uses only the lower set of data which is for mixed weekdays. Using Fridays (which is what TAs generally assess as a weekday gives figures about 15% higher); (see Annex 2 – Trip Generation) 1 Assumed people would travel from areas that suited its traffic forecasts rather than where patronage would be most likely to be generated from. • The methodology has been altered in response to criticism, but 36-41% of VEHICLE trips are now forecast from a zone of 2803 people who live within about 500m of the site – many times more than is plausible; (See “Annex 3 – The Gravity Model”) Failed to recognise the existence of Westminster Way as the preferred route from the A34 to Botley. • Some account has been taken but it underestimates the amount, partly due to the above, and partly due to ignoring that satnavs send people along Westminster Way and that non local people will soon learn of the shortcut (see Annex 4 – Routes used to reach the site) Assumed that people will use routes that are not credible (e.g. driving through central Oxford from Cowley and Headington). • These have been adapted but still make implausible assumptions, such as the percentage of Cumnor traffic using Cumnor Hill and the A420 to reach the site; The Cowley issue still remains but is less important since so few are now forecast to come from Cowley – seemingly designed to reduce the proportion using the ring road and Botley Road. (see Annex 4 – Routes used to reach the site) Made assumptions about people using the centre who are already ‘passing by’ that are too high given local geography, while assuming that all trips to the current centre are all specially made to go there. • These have been altered, but are just as unlikely – the same proportion of people passing by who will stop is used as for Waitrose on Botley Road, even though much more patronage there is likely to be from passing trade, due to the congested nature of the Botley Road; again, only supermarket funded research from dissimilar locations is quoted. (See Annex 5 – “Diverted and Pass-By traffic) Failed to look beyond very local junctions in terms of traffic diverting (missing out the possibility of traffic diverting from the A34). • This is still true, and ignores the possibility that traffic will come on along Westminster Way, before heading North again; (See Annex 5 – “Diverted and Pass-By traffic) Assumed that people will link their shopping trips to such an exaggerated extent that the total trips to all shops turns out as less than those to the supermarket on its own. • Minor changes have been made but the total trips to the entire centre is still quite often less than that expected for the supermarket alone; They quote supermarket funded research from areas that are not like Botley, while ignoring other research. (See Annex 6 – “Secondary Linked Trips”) Used a survey to show how much traffic uses the current centre, but ignored the possibility that people drive straight through without stopping, and stop to drop children off for school but do not use the centre. • Not changed, but a recent survey by West Way Community Concern shows at least 19% of traffic in the morning peak is not using the centre. (see separate report “Errors in June 2013 traffic survey 25-09-2014”) 2 Made assumptions about how many trips should be added to the current situation due to unused office space, that are exaggerated. • Not changed; (These two points mean that traffic using the current site is overestimated, which has the effect of making the proposed development look as though it is adding less traffic than it actually will do). (see initial objection) Showed parking levels to be close to, but below, capacity. • This has been completely changed using lower trip generation rates, and assumptions that include those working at the site (amounting to 97 vehicles throughout the day) will park off- site – presumably in the surrounding streets; (see Annex 7 – Parking) Was optimistic about parking levels off site saying there would not be a problem, but with no evidence put forward. • Now uses a large area to assess ‘parking stress’ and concludes that 390 vehicles would need to be parked within 400m to cause 90% parking stress. The 97 expected employees cars (at any one time) and other parking could mean stress could be reached in the 200m radius normally use very much sooner; (see Annex 7 – Parking) . The real effect would be likely to be to large increases on most roads in the area, but with especially large increases on Westminster Way from the A34, and much greater congestion on the already congested West Way, Botley Road and A420 link from Botley Road to the A34. Westminster Way is in an Air Quality Management Area and that the extra traffic and likely congestion would add to emissions and pollution levels there. 3 Annex 1 - A Layperson’s Guide to Transport Assessment traffic calculations There is an entire industry devoted to writing Transport Assessments (TAs). They are commissioned by developers who want to see their development built. In order to gain planning permission they need to show that the traffic impacts will not be ‘severe’, so developers won’t want to pay for a TA that doesn’t back up their case. ‘Severe’ impacts usually occur where noticeable congestion will happen, and that assessment of congestion (or delays at junctions) is the very last stage of the analysis. So if congestion is predicted consultants will sometimes go back in the process to alter the figures until the ‘correct’ result is produced. Hence, in a sense, the tail often wags the dog. For the traffic prediction part of a TA, consultants will usually initially conduct what they feel is a fair assessment of how much traffic will be produced by the development, where it will come from and how it will be distributed across local roads, and then work out what that means for congestion at junctions. It is a multi stage process, for which there is no standard procedure. For most smaller developments it will be found that there will be few problems caused, but if there is any doubt, or if congestion is shown to the likely, the consultants have plenty of scope to play around with the figures and assumptions to make it look as though there will be no problem. It has been said that transport assessment has the complexity of rocket science but the accuracy of a circus cannon. There is plenty of jargon which is not always used in the same way, and even most transport professionals baulk at the thought of unpicking the details of how a TA has been done and whether it is correct or fair. The inherent inaccuracy of prediction coupled with the knowledge that most people (including Local Authority staff and Planning Committee members) will not feel able to challenge what is written, ensures that consultants have got used to getting away with showing that some major developments will have little traffic impact. In many cases they’re right – traffic to some developments will be largely due to people who are passing by anyway – a petrol station is an obvious example! Most new developments do not generate entirely new journeys but change the day to day travel patterns that people are making already.
Recommended publications
  • Oxford CYM CMS House, Watlington Road, Oxford, OX4 6BZ
    Oxford CYM CMS House, Watlington Road, Oxford, OX4 6BZ Email: [email protected] Tel: 01865 787455 Travel to Oxford CYM @ CMS House BUS From train station: Pick up the number 5 Oxford Bus company bus to Blackbird Leys from outside the train station—bus stop R2 every 10 mins From Town Centre: pick up the number 5 Oxford Bus Company bus to Blackbird Leys from St Aldates—bus stop G3 every 10 mins A return Ticked is around £2.80 Continue on bus through City Centre, up the Cowley Road, throuGh Cowley Centre up onto the Blackbird Leys estate. Get off on the 2nd stop on Balfour Road (see map) turn left up Tucker Road onto Sandy Lane, walk towards the WatlinGton By Car (NB sat navs do not direct accurately to CMS Road, cross over at the traffic liGhts and the CMS Building is car park, enter Transport Way instead of post code) straiGht in front of you. (We are by the B480 siGn on below map) From the M40 /London ***Think*** could you help a fellow student by car sharing, Leave the M40 at junction 8 and join the A40 towards picking someone up on root etc?*** Oxford. Continue on the A40 until the HeadinGton roundabout, take the first exit onto the A4142 (Eastern Bypass Road). Continue on past BMW on the left. Leave the A4142 at the Cowley junction At the roundabout at the bottom of the slip road take the first exit onto WatlinGton Road (B480) Continue for 0.4 miles and CMS House is on the left on the corner of Transport Way opposite LIDL.
    [Show full text]
  • Radcliffe House Boars Hill Oxford
    RADCLIFFE HOUSE Boars Hill Oxford RADCLIFFE HOUSE Boars Hill Oxford Ox1 An OutstAnding fAmily HOuse Only fOur miles frOm centrAl OxfOrd Principal House Drawing room Dining room Study Sitting room Kitchen/breakfast room Games room Master bedroom suite with dressing room and bathroom 4 further bedroom suites Cottage and Summer House Kitchen/sitting room Bedroom Bathroom Garaging for 4 cars Summer house with shower room and kitchenette +44 (0)20 7861 1070 55 Baker Street Swimming pool Mature gardens and grounds London W1U 8AN [email protected] In all approximately 1.75 acres +44 (0)1865 790 077 280 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED [email protected] www.knightfrank.com Viewing by appointment only. these particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. your attention is drawn to the important notice on the last page of the text. SITUATION Boars Hill is a sought after residential area, famous for its wooded rural setting, just 4 miles from the centre of the city of Oxford, with its wide range of schools, services and cultural amenities. Boars Hill is well served by communications with excellent access to the A34 and national motorway network. in easy reach are the regional centres of newbury and swindon. communications by rail are excellent with fast trains from either Oxford and didcot Parkway to london Paddington, taking about 50 and 40 minutes respectively or from the new Oxford Parkway station to london marylebone from Autumn 2015. radcliffe House is situated on foxcombe road, close to the main private schools in and around the Boars Hill area.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide
    Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide A city walk exploring the cultural and industrial heritage of the Oxford Canal Take a walk on a canal in the heart of the City of Oxford and discover a fascinating world outside of its dreaming spires! www.oxfordcanalheritage.org F O R D C X A O N E A L H T H L E I R A I T R A G E T Hythe Bridge 1 On the Heritage Trail The self-guided Oxford Canal Heritage Trail a thriving narrowboat community, canal is a linear walk along the Oxford Canal that locks, under ancient bridges along a green is approximately three miles (five kms) in corridor full of wildlife. On the trail you will total. You can begin either in Pocket Park learn why the canal was, and continues to just inside Hythe Bridge near the centre of be, so important, nationally as well as locally. Oxford City or at Ball’s Bridge in Wolvercote You will also find out why the canal was built, to the north of the city. There is the option who built it, who paid for it, and who pays of walking past Ball’s Bridge up to Duke’s for it now; the uses to which it was first put, Cut to complete the whole Trail although how its usefulness has changed overtime, you will have to return to near Balls Bridge how it could have been lost for ever, and the to get back into Oxford. However, unless the reasons for its revival. weather is poor, take your time and, whilst There is a large scale map of the Heritage you are walking, imagine the bustle of life on Trail at its start in Hythe Bridge Street this 200 year old canal when horses pulled (Ordnance Survey grid reference SU 508 working boats full of coal and other cargoes 064) and near the end of the trail at Ball’s to Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Conference Series: March 2017 Conference Programme
    Oxford Conference Series| 13th-15th March 2017 | 1 FLE 2017 Learning Oxford Conference Series: March 2017 Conference Programme 5th Academic International Conference on Interdisciplinary Legal Studies AICILS 2017 (Oxford) 3rd International Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Marketing ICBEMM 2017 (Oxford) Conference Venue: University of Oxford, St. Anne's College, Oxford, United Kingdom Conference Dates: 13th-16th March 2017 AICILS Oxford ICBEMM Oxford www.flelearning.co.uk FLE Learning Oxford Conference Series| 13th-15th March 2017 | 2 Contents FLE LEARNING .................................................................................................................................................. 2 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME DAY ONE* ........................................................................................................... 3 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME DAY TWO* ........................................................................................................ 11 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME DAY THREE* ...................................................................................................... 15 IMPORTANT INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 16 FLE Learning FLE Learning seeks to develop the knowledge and skills of both public and private sector actors on key new developments and issues in the area of law, trade, business, finance and economics by organising a variety of events, such as conferences, courses, training,
    [Show full text]
  • Old Headington Conservation Area Appraisal
    Old Headington Conservation Area Appraisal July 2011 Old Headington Conservation Area Appraisal Contents Contents Page. Statement of Special Interest 1 Summary 2 Significance 2 Vulnerability 3 Negative features 3 1. Introduction 4 Policy Context 4 Public Consultation 5 2. Landscape Setting 6 Geographical location 6 Geology and topography 6 Setting 7 Biodiversity 8 3. Historical Development 10 Archaeological Potential 20 4. Spatial Analysis 22 Key Positive Characteristics: 22 Plan form and layout 23 Views and Vistas 27 Trees and green landscape 28 Public Realm 29 5. Buildings 32 Key Positive Characteristics 32 Building Types and Forms 32 Materials, Style and Features 39 Buildings of Local Historic Interest and ‘Positive’ Buildings 42 6. Character Areas 43 The Historic Core - Old High Street and St Andrew’s Road 43 The Croft 46 Bury Knowle 50 Larkin’s Lane and St Andrew’s Lane 53 Headington House and Osler Road Mansions 56 Dunstan Road 59 Green Fields 62 Cuckoo Lane 65 7. Negative Features, Issues and Opportunities for Enhancement 67 8. Sources 71 Appendix: Listed Buildings 72 Maps: Map 1. Old Headington Conservation Area Map 2 Old Headington Spatial Analysis Map 3. Old Headington Positive Buildings Map 4. Old Headington Character Areas Old Headington Conservation Area Appraisal Statement of Special Interest Statement of Special Interest Old Headington retains the character of a quiet rural village largely built between the 17th and 19th centuries within an attractive green setting despite encroachment by suburban housing from the late 19th to mid 20th century. The conservation area is made up of several character areas, including the village's historic core of closely spaced houses fronting principal streets and an intricate network of smaller lanes including highly distinctive residential areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford to Cambridge Expressway Strategic Study: Interim Report
    OXFORD TO CAMBRIDGE EXPRESSWAY STRATEGIC STUDY Deliverable 1 – Examination of the Strategic Case for New Expressway East-West Road Links 08/07/2016 Confidentiality: Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks First Issue Second Issue Third Issue Fourth Issue Date February 2016 April 2016 April 2016 July 2016 Prepared by Andi Redhead Andi Redhead Andi Redhead Andi Redhead Edward Shortridge Edward Shortridge Edward Shortridge Edward Shane Luck Shane Luck Shane Luck Shortridge Shane Luck Signature Checked by Adrian Hames Adrian Hames Adrian Hames Adrian Hames Signature Authorised by Mike Batheram Mike Batheram Mike Batheram Mike Batheram Signature Project number 70015095 70015095 70015095 70015095 Report number 1 1 1 1 Revision 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1 | 144 OXFORD TO CAMBRIDGE EXPRESSWAY STRATEGIC STUDY Deliverable 1 – Examination of the Strategic Case for New Expressway East-West Road Links 08/07/2016 Client Highways England / Department for Transport Lead Consultant WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Limited Tel: 01223 558 050 www.wsp-pb.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF Integrated Delivery Team Contacts Adrian Hames – [email protected] 07825643848 Helen Spackman – [email protected] 01793 816555 Mike Batheram – [email protected] Project number: 70015095 Dated: 08/07/2016 2 | 144 Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Study Objectives ......................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Heritage Walks Book 2
    Oxford Heritage Walks Book 2 On foot from Broad Street by Malcolm Graham © Oxford Preservation Trust, 2014 This is a fully referenced text of the book, illustrated by Edith Gollnast with cartography by Alun Jones, which was first published in 2014. Also included are a further reading list and a list of common abbreviations used in the footnotes. The published book is available from Oxford Preservation Trust, 10 Turn Again Lane, Oxford, OX1 1QL – tel 01865 242918 Contents: Broad Street to Ship Street 1 – 8 Cornmarket Street 8 – 14 Carfax to the Covered Market 14 – 20 Turl Street to St Mary’s Passage 20 – 25 Radcliffe Square and Bodleian Library 25 – 29 Catte Street to Broad Street 29 - 35 Abbreviations 36 Further Reading 36-37 Chapter 1 – Broad Street to Ship Street The walk begins at the western end of Broad Street, outside the Fisher Buildings of Balliol College (1767, Henry Keene; refaced 1870).1 ‘The Broad’ enjoyably combines grand College and University buildings with humbler shops and houses, reflecting the mix of Town and Gown elements that has produced some of the loveliest townscapes in central Oxford. While you savour the views, it is worth considering how Broad Street came into being. Archaeological evidence suggests that the street was part of the suburban expansion of Oxford in the 12th century. Outside the town wall, there was less pressure on space and the street is first recorded as Horsemonger Street in c.1230 because its width had encouraged the sale of horses. Development began on the north side of the street and the curving south side echoes the shape of the ditch outside the town wall, which, like the land inside it, was not built upon until c.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.2.4 Scheme Plans Dependent Development Site Areas Excerpt from West Oxfordshire Local Plan 2031, Adopted September 2018
    1.2.4 Scheme Plans Dependent Development Site Areas excerpt from West Oxfordshire Local Plan 2031, Adopted September 2018 A40 STRATEGY CONCEPTUAL SCHEME PROPOSALS 1. A40 DUAL CARRIAGEWAY 1.1 What is proposed? The proposed scheme plans to extend the existing dual carriageway from Witney eastwards to the proposed Eynsham Park & Ride. The existing shared footway/cycleway on the northern side of the A40 will be retained and improved. New junctions are proposed to ensure properties along the route - and at Barnard Gate - have a safe point of access to the dual car- riageway. Environmental measures will seek to mitigate the impacts arising from widening the road. This scheme will require land outside of the current highway boundary which is currently in private ownership. Once we have a clearer idea of the land required for the scheme we will be contacting land owners to discuss the proposals and our strategy in more detail. 1.2 Why is a dual carriageway proposed? There is already severe congestion on this section of the A40 - particularly during the morning commute. This proposal seeks to increase highway capacity on this section of the A40 for all types of vehicles. This will improve accessibility to the Park & Ride for many users from the west, providing a choice of travel options for onward travel into Oxford. To help deliver planned growth and economic development and mitigate its impact on the existing road transport network. To create additional capacity for east/westbound trips and encourage traffic to use the A40 rather than other, less-suitable routes. To create strong linkages between West Oxfordshire and key services, facilities and employment sites located at Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Streams and Spires a Self Guided Walk Along Oxford’S Waterways
    City of streams and spires A self guided walk along Oxford’s waterways Folly Bridge and island © Webb Aviation www.webbaviation.co.uk Explore a fascinating network of rivers, streams and canals Discover how natural and manmade waterways have shaped the city Learn about the methods used to prevent flooding Find out how water has inspired Oxford’s industry, leisure and literature .discoveringbritain www .org ies of our land the stor scapes throug discovered h walks 2 Contents Introduction 4 Route overview 5 Practical information 6 Detailed route maps 8 Commentary 10 Credits 40 Further information 41 © The Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers, London, 2012 Discovering Britain is a project of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) The digital and print maps used for Discovering Britain are licensed to the RGS-IBG from Ordnance Survey 3 City of streams and spires Explore Oxford’s fascinating network of waterways Introduction Did you know that the city of Oxford is built on a series of islands? This walk is an opportunity to explore an intricate network of waterways that are often overlooked by visitors to the city. Discover gushing mill streams and pic- turesque flood meadows, walk along an industrial canal and a working river, watch leisure boating and competitive rowing. Look for evidence in the names of neighbourhoods, streets, bridges and Pollarded trees at Rewley pubs giving clues to the watery history of Rory Walsh © RGS-IBG Discovering Britain this city. Discover why convicts from Oxford’s prison built many of Oxford’s canal, locks and other structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Cherwell
    Chapter 7 Cherwell Background Cherwell, North Oxfordshire, lies astride the M40 motorway between London and Birmingham. In population terms, Cherwell is the second largest district in Oxfordshire with a population of approximately 132,000. Over two-thirds of Cherwell’s population live in the three main urban centres – Banbury, Bicester and Kidlington – with populations of 42,000, 29,000 and 17,000 respectively. 15% of Cherwell residents commute outside of Oxfordshire to work. Just over 48,000 remain in Oxfordshire to work with a further 7,000 working at home and 5,000 with no fixed workplace. At the time of the 2001 census, approximately 72,000 residents of Cherwell were in employment. A breakdown of people’s main mode for the journey to work is set out below: Bicycle 4% Other 2% Train 2% Bus 5% Car Passenger 7% Work from home 10% Car driver % 60 On foot 10% Development Challenges Cherwell, because of its location, is becoming a prime location for business relocation. Although this is very good for local employment, it produces a challenge for the authorities to balance between desired economic development and the adverse impacts that this brings to the transport networks. The main transport challenge that Cherwell will face over the next five years is the demand that housing development at Banbury and Page 141 Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan 2006-11 Bicester will place on not only the networks of the towns but also on strategic routes such as the M40 and A34. Housing Growth Assumptions 2006 - 2016 The Oxfordshire Structure Plan 2006 – 2016 proposes 5900 additional dwellings in Cherwell between 2006 and 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • EFL League One 2021/22
    EFL League One 2021/22 John Aitken & Alien Copeland EFL League One 2021/22 Contents Accrington Stanley ..................................................................................................... 4 AFC Wimbledon……………………………………………………………………………..7 Bolton Wanderers .................................................................................................... 10 Burton Albion……………………………………………………………………………….14 Cambridge United ……………………………………………………………………… 19 Charlton Athletic.…………………………………………………………………………. 23 Cheltenham Town ……………………………………………………………………… 29 Crewe Alexandria ………………………………………………………………………… 32 Doncaster Rovers………………………………………………………………………….37 Fleetwood Town…………………………………………………………………………....40 Gillingham…………………………………………………………………………………..45 Ipswich Town……………………………………………………………………………… 49 Lincoln City ……………………………………………………………………………….. 53 Milton Keynes Dons ……………………………………………………………………… 58 Morecambe ………..………………………………………………………………….…. 62 Oxford United………………………………………………………………………………66 Plymouth Argyle ………………………………………………………………………….. 71 Portsmouth………………………………………………………………………………….75 Rotherham United …………………………………………………………………………80 Sheffield Wednesday …………………………………………………………………… 83 Shrewsbury Town……………………………………………………………………….... 87 Sunderland………………………………………………………………………………… 94 Wigan Athletic …………………………………………………………………………… 96 Wycombe Wanderers ………………………………………………………………… 99 1 1. EFL Groundhopper book 2019/20 League One Page 2 EFL League One 2021/22 Guide to League One teams for 2019-20 season in this part of the book I have outlined their history old
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan Draft for Consultation
    111 ● Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan Draft for Consultation While Oxfordshire County Council has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, it does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this document and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. © Copyright, Oxfordshire County Council, 2012 Copyright in the typographical arrangements rests with Oxfordshire County Council. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non-commercial research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The title must be acknowledged as copyright and the title of the publication specified. Unless specified, all maps, tables, diagrams and graphs in this report are a product of Oxfordshire County Council. 222 ● Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan Draft for Consultation CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................5 PREFACE............................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF THE STRATEGY.................................................................10 Background .......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]