DOCSLIB.ORG

The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

  1287
Copy Link
The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Geoffrey Chaucer, The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, vol. 7 (Supplement: Chaucerian and Other Pieces) [1897] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected]. LIBERTY FUND, INC. 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-1684 Online Library of Liberty: The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, vol. 7 (Supplement: Chaucerian and Other Pieces) Edition Used: The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, edited from numerous manuscripts by the Rev. Walter W. Skeat (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1899). 7 vols. Author: Geoffrey Chaucer Editor: Walter W. Skeat About This Title: The late 19th century Skeat edition with copious scholarly notes and a good introduction to the texts. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 2 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1993 Online Library of Liberty: The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, vol. 7 (Supplement: Chaucerian and Other Pieces) About Liberty Fund: Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright Information: The text is in the public domain. Fair Use Statement: This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 3 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1993 Online Library of Liberty: The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, vol. 7 (Supplement: Chaucerian and Other Pieces) Table Of Contents Errata and Addenda Introduction I: The Testament of Love. Book I Prologue. [ ] Book II. Book III. II.: The Plowmans Tale. III.: Jack Upland. IV.: John Gower Unto the Worthy and Noble Kinge Henry the Fourth. V.: Thomas Hoccleve. the Letter of Cupid. VI.: To the Kinges Most Noble Grace; and to the Lordes and Knightes of the Garter. VII.: A Moral Balade. VIII.: John Lydgate. the Complaint of the Black Knight; Or, the Complaint of a Loveres Lyfe. IX.: The Flour of Curtesye. X.: A Balade; In Commendation of Our Lady. XI.: To My Soverain Lady. XII.: Ballad of Good Counsel. XIII.: Beware of Doubleness. XIV.: A Balade: Warning Men to Beware of Deceitful Women. XV.: Three Sayings. XVI.: La Belle Dame Sans Mercy. Translated Out of French By Sir Richard Ros. XVII.: The Testament of Cresseid. XVIII.: The Cuckoo and the Nightingale; Or the Book of Cupid, God of Love. XIX.: Envoy to Alison. XX.: The Flower and the Leaf. XXI.: The Assembly of Ladies. XXII.: A Goodly Balade. XXIII.: Go Forth, King. XXIV.: The Court of Love. XXV.: Virelai. XXVI.: Prosperity. XXVII.: Leaulte Vault Richesse. XXVIII.: Sayings Printed By Caxton. XXIX.: Balade In Praise of Chaucer. Notes. Glossarial Index. List of Subscribers. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 4 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1993 Online Library of Liberty: The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, vol. 7 (Supplement: Chaucerian and Other Pieces) [Back to Table of Contents] ERRATA AND ADDENDA INTRODUCTION § 1.The following pieces are selected, as being the most important, from among the very numerous ones which have been appended to Chaucer’s works in various editions. I use the word ‘appended’ advisedly. It is not true that these works were all attributed to Chaucer in the black-letter editions. The Praise of Peace was marked as Gower’s in Thynne’s first edition of 1532. Another piece in that edition is attributed to Scogan. The Letter of Cupid is expressly dated 1402, though Chaucer died in 1400. The Flower of Curtesye contains the words ‘Chaucer is dede’; and The Testament of Cresseid contains a remark which, in modern English, would run thus—‘Who knows if all that Chaucer wrote is true?’ Those who, through ignorance or negligence, regard Thynne’s edition of Chaucer as containing ‘Works attributed to Chaucer’ make a great mistake; and even if the mistake be excused on the ground that it has been very generally and very frequently made, this does not lessen its magnitude. The title of Thynne’s book is very instructive, and really runs thus:—‘The Workes of Geffray Chaucer newly printed, with dyuers workes which were neuer in print before, &c.’ This is strictly and literally true; for it contains such works of Chaucer’s as had previously been printed by Caxton, Wynkyn de Worde, and Julian Notary (see vol. i. p. 28), together with ‘dyuers workes [of various authors] which were neuer in print before.’ Which is the simple solution of the whole matter, as far as this edition is concerned. The same remarks apply to the second edition in 1542, and the third, printed about 1550. But Stowe, in 1561, altered the title so as to give it a new meaning. The title-page of his edition runs thus:—‘The Woorkes of Geffrey Chaucer, newly printed with diuers Addicions which were neuer in printe before.’ Here the authorship of Chaucer was, for the first time, practically claimed for the whole of Thynne’s volume. At the same time, Stowe did not really mean what he seems to say, for it was he who first added the words—‘made by Ihon lidgate’—to the title of ‘The Flower of Curtesie,’ and who first assigned a title (ascribing the poem to dan Ihon lidgat) to the poem beginning ‘Consider wel’; see no. 40 (vol. i. p. 33). § 2. It is clear that Thynne’s intention was to print a collection of poems, including all he could find of Chaucer and anything else of a similar character that he could lay his hands on1 . In other words, the collection was, from the beginning, a collection of the Works of Chaucer and other writers; and this fact was in no way modified by the adoption by Stowe and Speght of misleading titles that actually assigned to Chaucer all the poems in the volume! See further, as to this subject, in the discussion of The Court of Love below. PLL v6.0 (generated September, 2011) 5 http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1993 Online Library of Liberty: The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, vol. 7 (Supplement: Chaucerian and Other Pieces) The number of pieces appended, at various times, to Chaucer’s Works are so numerous that I have been obliged to restrict myself to giving a selection of them only. Of the non-Chaucerian pieces printed by Thynne in 1532, I have included all but three. The rejected pieces are those numbered 18, 21, and 22 in the list given at p. 32 of vol. i. They are all poor and uninteresting, but I add a few words of description. 18.A Praise of Women. Noticed in vol. i. p. 37. Though decisively rejected by Tyrwhitt, and excluded from Moxon’s reprint, it was revived (for no good reason) by Bell, and consequently appeared in the Aldine edition, which was founded on Bell’s. It enumerates the merits of womankind, and condemns the slanders of men concerning them. We ought to worship all women out of reverence for the Queen of heaven, and we shall do well to pray to Our Lady to bring us to the heaven in which she and all good women will be found. Thynne is not the sole authority for this poem, as it occurs also (in a Scottish dress) in the Bannatyne MS., fol. 275. The whole of this MS. (written in 1568) was printed for the Hunterian Club in 1873–9; see p. 799 of that edition. 21.The Lamentation of Mary Magdalen. Noticed in vol. i. p. 37. This lugubrious piece was probably the wail of a nun, who had no book but a Vulgate version of the Bible, from which all her quotations are taken. It bears no resemblance to any work by Chaucer, nor to any of the pieces in the present volume. It consists of 102 seven-line stanzas. The metre resembles Lydgate’s, but the final -e is hardly ever used. Bell’s text is not taken from Thynne, but from some later and inferior reprint of it. For this poem, Thynne’s first edition is the sole authority. 22.The Remedy of Love.
Recommended publications
  • Sixty Years of Australia in Space

    Sixty Years of Australia in Space

    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 153, part 1, 2020, pp. 46–57. ISSN 0035-9173/20/010046-12 Sixty years of Australia in space Kerrie Dougherty Space Humanities Department, International Space University, Strasbourg, France Email: [email protected] Abstract Australia’s involvement in space activities commenced in 1957, at the beginning of the Space Age, with space tracking and sounding rocket launches at Woomera. By 1960, Australia was considered one of the leading space-active nations and in 1967 became one of the earliest countries to launch its own satellite. Yet by 1980, Australia’s space prominence had dwindled, with the country lacking both a national space agency and a coherent national space policy. Despite attempts in the latter part of the 1980s to develop an Australian space industry, the lack of a coherent and consistent national space policy and an effective co-ordinating body, left Australia constantly “punching below its weight” in global space activities until the Twenty First Century. This paper will briefly examine the often-contradictory history of Australian space activities from 1957 to the announcement of the Australian Space Agency in 2017, providing background and context for the later papers in this issue. Introduction Launchpad: the Woomera or 60,000 years the Indigenous people of Rocket Range FAustralia have looked to the sky, using “If the Woomera Range did not already exist, the stars to determine their location, find the proposal that Australia should engage in their way across the land and mark the a program of civil space research would be passage of the seasons and the best times unrealistic”.
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection

    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection

    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
  • Desind Finding

    Desind Finding

    NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application.

  • The Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough 100 Years of Innovative Research, Development and Application

    Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 The Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough 100 years of Innovative Research, Development and Application Dr Graham Rood Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) Formerly Head of Man Machine Integration (MMI) Dept. RAE Farnborough ABSTRACT Aviation research and development has been carried out in Great Britain for well over a century. Starting with balloons in the army at Woolwich Arsenal in 1878, progressing through kites and dirigibles in 1907, through to the first practical aeroplanes, the B.E.1 and B.E.2, designed and built by the Royal Aircraft Factory in April 1911. At this time Mervyn O’Gorman was installed as the Superintendent of the Army Aircraft Factory and began to gather the best scientists and engineers and bring scientific methods to the design and testing of aeroplanes. Renamed the Royal Aircraft Factory (RAF) in April 1912, it designed, built and tested aircraft, engines and aircraft systems throughout WW1. In 1918 its title was changed to the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) to avoid confusion with the newly formed Royal Air Force. From then on RAE Farnborough and its outstations, including Bedford and Pyestock, developed into the biggest aviation research and development establishment in Europe and one of the best known names in aviation, working in all the disciplines necessary to build and test aircraft in their entirety. On the 1st April 1991 the RAE ceased to exist. The Establishment was renamed the Aerospace Division of the Defence Research Agency (DRA) and remained an executive agency of the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD). It was the start of changing its emphasis from research to gain and extend knowledge to more commercially focussed concerns.
  • Irresponsible Weapons Transfers and Future Weapon Systems

    Irresponsible Weapons Transfers and Future Weapon Systems

    Irresponsibletransfers weapons andfuture weaponsystems Outof Control: 7 2019 | 1 DIRTY PROFITS 7 PROFITS DIRTY | FACING FINANCE FACING Content Executive Summary 4 Features Arms Companies Exporting to Israel: Complicit in the Support of Collective Punishment and Restriction of Movement of Controversial Arms Exports – Palestinians, and Violations of International Law 40 The Role of Defence Companies and Banks 8 Hand-in-Hand: Banks and Arms Companies Profiting From War (Crimes) in Yemen 42 The Bottom line: Controversial Weapons – Why Autonomous Weapons are a Bad Investment 48 The Role of Defence Companies and Banks 10 Methodology 12 Harmful Investments European Banks – Defence policies compared 51 Asset Managers: Controversial Exports in the MENA Region: → Blackrock Inc: Sustainability Champion or Lord of War? 53 Country profiles 16 → Investing Money Safely – A Deadly Business! 55 Company Profiles Recommendations and Demands 57 Airbus SE 21 BAE Systems 23 Boeing Co 25 General Dynamics Corp 27 Appendices to the report Leonardo SpA 28 Appendix 1: Table of Weapons Exports by Company 61 Lockheed Martin Corp 29 Appendix 2: Financial Data Tables 70 Northrop Grumman Corp 31 Appendix 3: Financial Institution Divestment from Companies 71 Raytheon Co 33 Appendix 4: Heading Towards Autonomy? A Potential Watchlist 73 Rheinmetall AG 35 Appendix 5: Assessment for Middle East and North Africa Thales Group 37 (MENA) Region Countries 75 ThyssenKrupp AG 38 2019 | Cover Photo: Smoke rises during an air strike on an army weapons depot on a DIRTY PROFITS 7 PROFITS DIRTY | mountain overlooking Yemen's capital Sanaa April 20, 2015. REUTERS/Khaled Abdullah FACING FINANCE FACING 2 Weapons from the USA, the United Kingdom and France are in high demand in the Gulf region, where conflicts and tensions are rife,’ and ‘Russia, France and Germany dramatically increased their arms sales to Egypt in the past five years.” Pieter D.
  • Dependence: British Space Research Policy 1959-73

    Dependence: British Space Research Policy 1959-73

    1 Title Page National prestige and in(ter)dependence: British space research policy 1959-73 A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health School of Biological Sciences 2016 Stuart A. Butler 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents Title Page .................................................................................................................................. 1 Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 5 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 6 Declaration ............................................................................................................................... 7 Copyright Statement ................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................
  • HSR-36 Document

    HSR-36 Document

    HSR-36 April 2005 An Overview of United Kingdom Space Activity 1957-1987 by Douglas Millard Contact: ESA Publications Division c/o ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands Tel. (31) 71 565 3400 - Fax (31) 71 565 5433 HSR-36 April 2005 An Overview of United Kingdom Space Activity 1957-1987 Douglas Millard Senior Curator of Information, Communication and Space Technologies Science Museum, London HSR-36 Erratum on page 36 The Spacelab-2 mission’s launch date should read 29.07.85, and the payload listing should have included the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) from the University of Birmingham. ii Published by: ESA Publications Division ESTEC, PO Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Editor: Bruce Battrick Price: €20 ISSN: 1683-4704 ISBN: 90-9092-547-7 Copyright: ©2005 The European Space Agency Printed in: The Netherlands iii Contents Introduction . .1 Acknowledgments . .2 Part 1 – UK Space Policy: An impression . .3 Part 2 – The Organization of UK Space Activity . .9 Part 3 – Space Concerns . .13 Launch vehicles . .13 Space science . .14 Space industry . .15 Space interest groups . .15 Part 4 – Literature Survey, Archival Resources and Bibliography . .17 Part 5 – Appendices 5.1 Departmental space interests, 1967 . .23 5.2 Space expenditure, 1965-1987 . .24 5.2a Detailed breakdown of space expenditure, 1965-1972 . .25 5.3 Science missions with UK involvement . .26 5.3a Key to main UK space science groups and space companies . .37 5.4 Applications satellites with UK (including Prime) involvement . .38 5.5 Abbreviations . .40 iv 1 Introduction This history has two main objectives: to provide an overview of United Kingdom civil space activity between 1957 and 1987; and to provide a concise history document that indicates the location of more detailed and specific histories and sources.
  • For Materialising the History of Technology

    For Materialising the History of Technology

    Douglas Millard Black Arrow R4: a candidate for materialising the history of technology Introduction On 28 October 1971, a Black Arrow rocket launched the X3 satellite into orbit. It was the fourth Black Arrow to be built; the first three had been used on development flights. The fifth vehicle, R4, should have launched the next satellite in the X series, but, with the Black Arrow programme already cancelled, it was acquired in 1972 by the Science Museum instead. For almost 15 years the rocket was kept in the Museum's storage facility. In 1986 it was put on display in the museum's new 'Exploration of Space' gallery and in 2000 redisplayed there in a partial refurbishment of the gallery. Black Arrow R4 has now been on museum inventory for over 30 years. How have the museum's practices of collecting and exhibiting artefacts of this kind assisted in our understanding of the Black Arrow programme? How does this understanding compare with that we might obtain from the historical literature? Can the respective objectives of the museum curator and historian find common ground through the artefact? These are the questions addressed in this chapter. I start with a review of R4's museum 'life' and outline the types of historical interpretation of it the museum has offered to the visitor during this time. I move on to compare this display 'historiography' and its shortcomings with that found in the literature for Black Arrow. The study then dips into the museum's collection of primary, printed UK rocketry source material in an attempt to reveal some of the many factors, unacknowledged in both the Black Arrow literature and in R4's displays, that contributed to the shaping of this artefact.
  • Showcasing Space

    Showcasing Space

    SHOWCASING SPACE Edited by Martin Collins Smithsonian InstitutionJ Washington DC Douglas Millard Science MuseumJ London Advisory Editor Robert Bud Science MuseumJ London Associate Editors Bernard Finn Smithsonian InstitutionJ Washington DC Helmuth Trischler Deutsches MuseumJ Munich sCience museum Published 2005 by NMSI Trading Ltd, Science Museum, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2DD All rights reserved © 2005 Board ofTrustees of the Science Museum, except for contributions from employees of US national museums Designed by Jerry Fowler Printed in England by the Cromwell Press ISBN 1 900747 61 8 ISSN 1029-3353 Website http://www.nmsi.ac.uk Artefacts series: studies in the history of science and technology In growing numbers, historians are using technological artefacts in the study and interpretation of the recent past. Their work is still largely pioneering, as they investigate approaches and modes of presentation. But the consequences are already richly rewarding. To encourage this enterprise, three of the world's greatest repositories of the material heritage of science and technology: the Deutsches Museum, the Science Museum and the Smithsonian Institution, are collaborating on this book series. Each volume treats a particular subject area, using objects to explore a wide range of issues related to science, technology and medicine and their place in society. Edited by Robert Bud, Science Museum, London Bernard Finn, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC Helmuth Trischler, Deutsches Museum, Munich Volume 1 Manifesting Medicine Principal
  • Guide to the Herbert Stephen Desind Collection, 1950-1992

    Guide to the Herbert Stephen Desind Collection, 1950-1992

    Guide to the Herbert Stephen Desind Collection, 1950-1992 Brian D. Nicklas 2003 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Unmanned Space Programs, undated..................................................... 4 Series 2: Manned Space Programs, undated...................................................... 398 Series 3: Aircraft, undated................................................................................... 523 Series 4: Countries, undated................................................................................ 599 Series
  • Lessons from British Missile Development

    Lessons from British Missile Development

    Benjamin Cole SOFT TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: LESSONS FROM BRITISH MISSILE DEVELOPMENT by Benjamin Cole Dr. Benjamin Cole is currently a freelance researcher. He received a Ph.D. from Southampton University in 1996. Dr. Cole has previously held research posts in the Arms Control and Disarmament Research Unit of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and the Mountbatten Center for International Studies at the University of Southampton. he leakage and export of bal- attempting to integrate foreign tech- easily overshadowed by the more listic missile technology nologies into an indigenous devel- concrete aspects of missile hard- Tfrom states like Russia, opment program. Because of ware, the soft technology is unques- Ukraine, and China in recent years Britain’s advanced technological tionably more important. Without have heightened concerns about the level and the enormous benefits of sound policy choices, good organi- proliferation of ballistic missiles. its strong links to the United States, zation, skilled personnel and ad- Yet, the precise impact of technol- this also represents one of the best equate financing, no amount of even ogy transfers on the indigenous pro- possible cases for successful tech- the very best equipment can be suf- grams of proliferators is difficult to nology transfer. Therefore, any lim- ficient to create long-range ballistic determine. However, useful obser- its on such efforts identified in this missiles.”2 vations can be discerned from the case study should apply even more This article will test Karp’s the- British attempt to develop the Blue strongly in the case of current sis about soft technology, which sug- Streak ballistic missile system.