Ethanol Production Performance of Ozone Treated Tannin Grain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethanol Production Performance of Ozone Treated Tannin Grain e-Xtra* Ethanol-Production Performance of Ozone-Treated Tannin Grain Sorghum Flour1 Shuping Yan,2,3 Xiaorong Wu,2 Jon Faubion,4 Scott R. Bean,5 Liming Cai,4 Yong-Cheng Shi,4 Xiuzhi S. Sun,4 and Donghai Wang2,6 ABSTRACT Cereal Chem. 89(1):30–37 Ozone has been reported as being able to degrade macromolecules 72 hr of fermentation, the efficiencies of ozone-treated sorghum flour such as cellulose, starch, lignins, and tannins in the textile, pulping, were 2–5% higher than those of untreated samples. Measured tannin and water-treatment industries. Thus, we hypothesized that ozone treat- levels of ozone-treated samples decreased significantly from 3.8 to ment may also inactivate tannin activity and increase fermentation ef- 2.7%. Gel-permeation chromatographic results indicated that both deg- ficiency of tannin sorghum lines. The objective of this research was to radation and polymerization processes might have happened to starch study the physicochemical properties of ozone-treated whole tannin molecules during ozone treatment. Rapid Visco Analyzer data showed grain sorghum flour and its fermentation performance in ethanol pro- that the setback of viscosity of ozone-treated flour was lower than that duction. Results showed that the ethanol yields from ozone-treated of untreated flours. Distillers dried grains with solubles made from tannin grain sorghums were significantly higher than yields from the ozone-treated sorghum were low in residual starch (<1%) and high in untreated flour. The fermentation efficiency of ozone-treated tannin crude protein (≈35%). Therefore, ozonation could be a novel and use- grain sorghum was approximately 90%, which was 8–14% higher than ful method to improve ethanol yield and fermentation efficiency of that of untreated samples at the 36th hr of fermentation. At the end of tannin grain sorghum. The use of ethanol as a gasoline alternative, ethanol production, sorghum have focused on these grain sorghum types. Little re- and ethanol-production capacity in the United States are increas- search has been conducted on ethanol production from tannin ing rapidly because of federal mandates requiring the mixing of sorghum lines. Interest in tannin sorghum utilization has in- ethanol into gasoline. As stipulated by the Energy Independence creased as health benefits associated with tannins have been dis- and Security Act of 2007 and the expanded Renewable Fuels covered (Awika and Rooney 2004); tannin grain sorghum lines Standard, annual ethanol production will grow to 15 billion also have been shown to carry agronomic benefits such as resis- gallons by 2012 and to 36 billion gallons by 2022. Currently, tance to drought, birds, mold, insects, and disease and higher ethanol in the United States is produced mainly from crop-based grain yield than nontannin grain sorghum (Reichert et al 1980; starch-rich grains. Grain sorghum is one of the primary feed- Hahn and Rooney 1986). Although growing tannin sorghum has stocks for ethanol production. In 2009, more than 30% of the U.S. the advantages of lower production and storage costs and higher grain sorghum crop was used for ethanol production. As a major grain yields, the production of tannin sorghum and its use for sorghum grower, the state of Kansas used approximately 50% of ethanol production and animal feed are not desirable, largely be- its 2010 sorghum crop for ethanol production (Agri-Energy cause of the adverse effects of tannin on enzyme activity, starch Solutions 2009; Jessen 2010). and protein digestion, and ethanol fermentation efficiency. For Grain sorghum is a viable feedstock for ethanol production (D. identity-preserved and specialty markets, however, the use of tan- Wang et al 2008), and the performance of grain sorghum in etha- nin sorghum is very attractive. nol production has been studied and evaluated recently (Monk et Tannins are a group of highly hydroxylated phenolic com- al 1984; Wu et al 2007, 2010). Ethanol conversion efficiency has pounds that are common in plants. Sorghum tannins have been been intensively studied because of the importance of, and public actively studied for some time now with regard to food or feed concern over, net energy gain in ethanol production. Virtually all uses. Tannins may impact the processing, product quality, and of the current commercial sorghum lines in the United States are nutritional values of sorghum (Elkin et al 1996; Awika and tannin-free, and most of the previous research studies involving Rooney 2004; Kobue-Lekalake et al 2009). Sorghum tannins are located in the outer layers of the kernel, beneath the pericarp in the pigmented testa layer of sorghum grain. Tannins protect sor- * The e-Xtra logo stands for “electronic extra” and indicates that Figures 3 and 4 ghum grains, but because of their negative effects in animal nutri- appear in color online. tion, many studies have been conducted to remove or deactivate 1 Contribution number 11-346-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, tannins. Chibber et al (1978) reported that mechanical abrasion or Manhattan, KS 66506. decortication of sorghum coat layers could reduce the tannin con- 2 Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, tent of sorghum flour for food uses by physically removing the Manhattan, KS 66506. tannins. Reichert et al (1980) reported that anaerobic storage of 3 Current address: C. W. Brabender Instruments, Inc., 50 East Wesley Street, South Hackensack, NJ 07606. grain sorghum treated with water or HCl solution decreased tan- 4 Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, nin content in grain sorghum. Daiber and Taylor (1982) steeped KS 66506. sorghum seeds in dilute formaldehyde solution and dilute NaOH 5 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service, to decrease tannin levels. These methods likely degraded or cross- Grain and Animal Health Research Center, Manhattan, KS 66502. Names are linked the tannins, rendering them inactive. Germination of grain necessary to report factually on available data; however, USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA sorghum is another way to reduce tannin content (Reichert et al implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be used. 1980; Yan et al 2009). Deactivation of tannins during germina- 6 Corresponding author. Phone: (785) 532-2919. Fax: (785) 532-5825. E-mail: tion was similar to the reduction reported during anaerobic stor- [email protected] age of water-treated sorghum. The deactivation mechanism in http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/ CCHEM-06-11-0075 both processes may be the same, that is, enzymatic degradation © 2012 AACC International, Inc. (Yan et al 2009). 30 CEREAL CHEMISTRY Mullins and NeSmith (1986) studied ethanol fermentation from pensions were incubated in a 45°C water-bath shaker for 72 hr bird-resistant (i.e., tannin-containing) and non-bird-resistant (i.e., with constant agitation (150 rpm). The content from the flask was containing no tannins) grain sorghum and reported that high tan- sieved through a no. 200 wire sieve (opening 75 μm), and the nin levels greatly reduced the ethanol-production rate. Wu et al retained overs were washed twice with 200 mL (2 × 200 mL) of (2007) reported tannin content as a major factor affecting ethanol distilled water to recover starch. The washed overs were dis- conversion efficiency of grain sorghum in lines containing tan- carded, and the throughs were collected and passed through a no. nins. All results showed that ethanol yield and fermentation effi- 200 wire sieve (opening 75 μm). Again, the overs were discarded ciency increased as tannin content decreased in treated sorghum and the throughs were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 30 min. After (Yan et al 2009). each centrifugation, the supernatant and tailings were removed Ozone is a strong oxidant with oxidation potential of 2.07 eV. and discarded. The prime starch was washed with distilled water Ozone has the power to degrade vital components in living cells and centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 30 min. A total of 10 washing quickly and to kill microorganisms. It works at low dosage levels and centrifuge cycles were conducted to obtain clean prime and leaves no residue in the treated product. Because of these starch. The prime starch was freeze-dried for gel-permeation advantages, ozone has been used in water treatment, food proc- chromatography. essing (Kim et al 1999), and corn and wheat steeping prior to milling (Ruan et al 2004; Dhillon et al 2009). Previous studies Gel-Permeation Chromatography have shown that ozone degrades macromolecules such as lignin Four milligrams of purified starch from whole-grain sorghum (Sugimoto et al 2009), protein, and carbohydrates (Yosef et al flour was mixed with 4 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 1994; Wang et al 1999, 2008). Seo et al (2007) reported that chi- stirred in a boiling water bath for 24 hr. The sample was filtered tosan could be depolymerized by ozone treatment. Thus, the hypo- through a 2 µm filter, and then 200 µL was injected into a gel- thesis of the current project was that ozone treatment may degrade permeation chromatography (GPC) instrument (PL-GPC 220, or inactivate sorghum tannin and reduce its adverse activity dur- Polymer Laboratories, Amherst, MA) equipped with three differ- ing fermentation, thereby increasing the fermentation efficiency ent pore sizes of Phenogel columns (100Å, 103Å, and 105Å, Phe- of tannin sorghum. A process for deactivating sorghum tannins nogel GPC, 10 µm, 300 × 7.8 mm), a guard column (Phenome- prior to ethanol fermentation would enable additional uses for nex, Torrance, CA), and a differential refractive index detector. tannin-containing sorghum lines grown for special purposes such The eluent system was DMSO containing 5.0 mM NaNO3 at a as nutraceuticals or would prove valuable in areas of the world flow rate of 0.8 mL/min.
Recommended publications
  • Ozonedisinfection.Pdf
    ETI - Environmental Technology Initiative Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652 What is disinfection? Human exposure to wastewater discharged into the environment has increased in the last 15 to 20 years with the rise in population and the greater demand for water resources for recreation and other purposes. Disinfection of wastewater is done to prevent infectious diseases from being spread and to ensure that water is safe for human contact and the environment. There is no perfect disinfectant. However, there are certain characteristics to look for when choosing the most suitable disinfectant: • Ability to penetrate and destroy infectious agents under normal operating conditions; • Lack of characteristics that could be harmful to people and the environment; • Safe and easy handling, shipping, and storage; • Absence of toxic residuals, such as cancer-causing compounds, after disinfection; and • Affordable capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. What is ozone disinfection? One common method of disinfecting wastewater is ozonation (also known as ozone disinfection). Ozone is an unstable gas that can destroy bacteria and viruses. It is formed when oxygen molecules (O2) collide with oxygen atoms to produce ozone (O3). Ozone is generated by an electrical discharge through dry air or pure oxygen and is generated onsite because it decomposes to elemental oxygen in a short amount of time. After generation, ozone is fed into a down-flow contact chamber containing the wastewater to be disinfected. From the bottom of the contact chamber, ozone is diffused into fine bubbles that mix with the downward flowing wastewater. See Figure 1 on page 2 for a schematic of the ozonation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol Purification with Ozonation, Activated Carbon Adsorption, and Gas Stripping Shinnosuke Onuki Iowa State University
    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications 9-4-2015 Ethanol purification with ozonation, activated carbon adsorption, and gas stripping Shinnosuke Onuki Iowa State University Jacek A. Koziel Iowa State University, [email protected] William S. Jenks Iowa State University, [email protected] Lingshuang Cai Iowa State University Somchai Rice Iowa State University SeFoe nelloxtw pa thige fors aaddndition addal aitutionhorsal works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs Part of the Agriculture Commons, Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, and the Organic Chemistry Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ abe_eng_pubs/909. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ethanol purification with ozonation, activated carbon adsorption, and gas stripping Abstract Fermentation of sugar to produce ethanol also produces volatile byproducts. This study was aimed at purifying corn-based ethanol for industrial and pharmaceutical use. The er search was on treatment for 10 impurities removal after distillation. The the anol headspace was sampled with solid-phase microextraction and analyzed with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. A 40 mg/L ozone treatment resulted in >56% and >36% removal of styrene and 2-pentylfuran, respectively, without significant generation of byproducts.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication No. 17: Ozone Treatment of Private Drinking Water Systems
    PRIVATE DRINKING WATER IN CONNECTICUT Publication Date: April 2009 Publication No. 17: Ozone Treatment of Private Drinking Water Systems Effective Against: Pathogenic (disease-causing) organisms including bacteria and viruses, phenols (aromatic organic compounds), some color, taste and odor problems, iron, manganese, and turbidity. Not Effective Against: Large cysts and some other large organisms resulting from possible or probable sewage contamination, inorganic chemicals, and heavy metals. How Ozone (O3) Treatment Works Ozone is a chemical form of pure oxygen. Like chlorine, ozone is a strong oxidizing agent and is used in much the same way to kill disease-causing bacteria and viruses. It is effective against most amoebic cysts, and destroys bacteria and some aromatic organic compounds (such as phenols). Ozone may not kill large cysts and some other large organisms, so these should be eliminated by filtration or other procedures prior to ozone treatment. Ozone is effective in eliminating or controlling color, taste, and odor problems. It also oxidizes iron and manganese. Ozone treatment units are installed as point-of-use treatment systems. Raw water enters one opening and treated water emerges from another. Inside the treatment unit, ozone is produced by an electrical corona discharge or ultraviolet irradiation of dry air or oxygen. The ozone is mixed with the water whenever the water pump is running. Ozone generation units require a system to clean and remove the humidity from the air. For proper disinfection the water to be treated must have negligible color and turbidity levels. The system requires routine maintenance and an ozone treatment system can be very energy consumptive.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide in Water Implications For
    UC Irvine Faculty Publications Title Interaction of ozone and hydrogen peroxide in water: Implications for analysis of H 2 O 2 in air Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7j7454z7 Journal Geophysical Research Letters, 9(3) ISSN 00948276 Authors Zika, R. G Saltzman, E. S Publication Date 1982-03-01 DOI 10.1029/GL009i003p00231 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California GEOPHYSICLARESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 9, NO. 3, PAGES231-234 , MARCH1982 INTERACTION OF OZONE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN WATER: IMPLICATIONSFORANALYSIS oFH20 2 IN AIR R.G. Zika and E.S. Saltzman Division of Marine and Atmospheric Chemistry, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 331#9 Abstract. We have attempted to measure gaseous Analytical Methods H202 in air usingan aqueoustrapping method. With continuousbubbling, H 20 2 levels in the traps reacheda a. Hydrogen Peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide in aqueous plateau, indicating that a state of dynamic equilibrium solution was measured using a modified fluorescence involving H202 destrbction was established. We decay technique [Perschke and Broda, 1976; Zika and attribute this behavior to the interaction of ozone and its Zelmer, 1982]. The method involved the addition of a decompositionproducts (OH, O[) withH 20 2 inacld:•ous known amot•at of scopoletin (6-methyl-7-hydroxyl-i,2- solution. This hypothesis was investigated by replacing benzopyrone)to a pH 7.0 phosphatebuffered. sample. the air stream with a mixture of N2, 02 and 0 3. The The sample was prepared bY diluting an aliquot of the results Of this experiment show that H O was both reaction solution to 20 mls with low contaminant producedand destroyedin the traps.
    [Show full text]
  • Ozone: Good up High, Bad Nearby
    actions you can take High-Altitude “Good” Ozone Ground-Level “Bad” Ozone •Protect yourself against sunburn. When the UV Index is •Check the air quality forecast in your area. At times when the Air “high” or “very high”: Limit outdoor activities between 10 Quality Index (AQI) is forecast to be unhealthy, limit physical exertion am and 4 pm, when the sun is most intense. Twenty minutes outdoors. In many places, ozone peaks in mid-afternoon to early before going outside, liberally apply a broad-spectrum evening. Change the time of day of strenuous outdoor activity to avoid sunscreen with a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) of at least 15. these hours, or reduce the intensity of the activity. For AQI forecasts, Reapply every two hours or after swimming or sweating. For check your local media reports or visit: www.epa.gov/airnow UV Index forecasts, check local media reports or visit: www.epa.gov/sunwise/uvindex.html •Help your local electric utilities reduce ozone air pollution by conserving energy at home and the office. Consider setting your •Use approved refrigerants in air conditioning and thermostat a little higher in the summer. Participate in your local refrigeration equipment. Make sure technicians that work on utilities’ load-sharing and energy conservation programs. your car or home air conditioners or refrigerator are certified to recover the refrigerant. Repair leaky air conditioning units •Reduce air pollution from cars, trucks, gas-powered lawn and garden before refilling them. equipment, boats and other engines by keeping equipment properly tuned and maintained. During the summer, fill your gas tank during the cooler evening hours and be careful not to spill gasoline.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Acetone Draft for Public Comment
    ACETONE 1 Toxicological Profile for Acetone Draft for Public Comment July 2021 ***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT*** ACETONE ii DISCLAIMER Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre dissemination public comment under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. ***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT*** ACETONE iii FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a substance's toxicologic properties. Other pertinent literature is also presented, but is described in less detail than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information are referenced. The focus of the profiles is on health and toxicologic information; therefore, each toxicological profile begins with a relevance to public health discussion which would allow a public health professional to make a real-time determination of whether the presence of a particular substance in the environment poses a potential threat to human health.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
    The information presented here reflects EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2002. The Agency is in the process of updating this information to reflect modifications included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003. The revised information will be posted on the Agency's Clear Skies Web site (www.epa.gov/clearskies) as soon as possible. Overview of the Human Health and Environmental Effects of Power Generation: Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Mercury (Hg) June 2002 Contents The Clear Skies Initiative is intended to reduce the health and environmental impacts of power generation. This document briefly summarizes the health and environmental effects of power generation, specifically those associated with sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), and mercury (Hg). This document does not address the specific impacts of the Clear Skies Initiative. • Overview -- Emissions and transport • Fine Particles • Ozone (Smog) • Visibility • Acid Rain • Nitrogen Deposition • Mercury Photo Credits: 1: USDA; EPA; EPA; VTWeb.com 2: NADP 6: EPA 7: ?? 10: EPA 2 Electric Power Generation: Major Source of Emissions 2000 Sulfur Dioxide 2000 Nitrogen Oxides 1999 Mercury Fuel Combustion- Industrial Processing electric utilities Transportation Other stationary combustion * Miscellaneous * Other stationary combustion includes residential and commercial sources. • Power generation continues to be an important source of these major pollutants. • Power generation contributes 63% of SO2, 22% of NOX, and 37% of man-made mercury to the environment. 3 Overview of SO2, NOX, and Mercury Emissions, Transport, and Transformation • When emitted into the atmosphere, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury undergo chemical reactions to form compounds that can travel long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Method TO-11A
    EPA/625/R-96/010b Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Second Edition Compendium Method TO-11A Determination of Formaldehyde in Ambient Air Using Adsorbent Cartridge Followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) [Active Sampling Methodology] Center for Environmental Research Information Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 January 1999 Method TO-11A Acknowledgements This Method was prepared for publication in the Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Second Edition (EPA/625/R-96/010b), which was prepared under Contract No. 68-C3-0315, WA No. 3-10, by Midwest Research Institute (MRI), as a subcontractor to Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG), and under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Justice A. Manning, John O. Burckle, and Scott Hedges, Center for Environmental Research Information (CERI), and Frank F. McElroy, National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL), all in the EPA Office of Research and Development, were responsible for overseeing the preparation of this method. Additional support was provided by other members of the Compendia Workgroup, which include: • John O. Burckle, U.S. EPA, ORD, Cincinnati, OH • James L. Cheney, Corps of Engineers, Omaha, NB • Michael Davis, U.S. EPA, Region 7, KC, KS • Joseph B. Elkins Jr., U.S. EPA, OAQPS, RTP, NC • Robert G. Lewis, U.S. EPA, NERL, RTP, NC • Justice A. Manning, U.S. EPA, ORD, Cincinnati, OH • William A. McClenny, U.S. EPA, NERL, RTP, NC • Frank F. McElroy, U.S. EPA, NERL, RTP, NC • Heidi Schultz, ERG, Lexington, MA • William T.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Acetone Oxidation Using Ozone on Manganese Oxide
    Chapter 2 Acetone Oxidation Using Ozone on Manganese Oxide Catalysts 2.1 Introduction This chapter presents an activity study of VOC oxidation using ozone over supported manganese oxide catalysts. The VOC used in this study was acetone, which is a common solvent used in many industrial processes such as surface coating, painting, and extraction. Similar to other VOCs, acetone is harmful to human health. Acetone has been studied in the literature as an example of a VOC containing a carbonyl group [1, 2, 3, 4]. In one of the studies involving manganese oxide as the catalyst, Baldi et al. [5] found that the conversion of acetone with excess oxygen over Mn3O4 started at near 473 K, with acetaldehyde being the main product, together with minor amounts of acetic acid. The conversion increased to high values in the temperature range of 510-563 K where the only carbon-containing product was CO2. In another study by Parida and Samal [2] manganese nodules collected from the Indian Ocean were used as the catalysts in the combustion with oxygen of VOCs, including acetone, and it was found that complete oxidation of acetone over these nodules was achieved at a temperature less than 573 K. It was reported by Ragaini et al. [3] that the oxidation temperature of acetone decreased by 10 % when ozone was used in the reaction compared to oxygen using a barium promoted copper- chromite catalyst. 10 In this study the manganese oxide active phase was placed on alumina foam substrates. These are porous monolithic materials with low densities and novel physical, mechanical, and thermal properties that offer potential application as catalyst supports [6, 7, 8, 9].
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Ozone and Where Is It in the Atmosphere? Ozone Is a Gas That Is Naturally Present in Our Atmosphere
    Section I: OZONE IN OUR ATMOSPHERE Q1 What is ozone and where is it in the atmosphere? Ozone is a gas that is naturally present in our atmosphere. Each ozone molecule contains three atoms of oxygen and is denoted chemically as O3. Ozone is found primarily in two regions of the atmosphere. About 10% of atmospheric ozone is in the troposphere, the region closest to Earth (from the surface to about 10–16 kilometers (6–10 miles)). The remaining ozone (about 90%) resides in the stratosphere between the top of the troposphere and about 50 kilometers (31 miles) altitude. The large amount of ozone in the stratosphere is often referred to as the “ozone layer.” zone is a gas that is naturally present in our atmos phere. Earth’s surface, ozone is even less abundant, with a typical OOzone has the chemical formula O3 because an ozone range of 20 to 100 ozone molecules for each billion air mole- molecule contains three oxygen atoms (see Figure Q1-1). cules. The highest surface values result when ozone is formed Ozone was discovered in laboratory experiments in the mid- in air polluted by human activities. 1800s. Ozone’s presence in the atmosphere was later discov- As an illustration of the low relative abundance of ozone ered using chemical and optical measurement methods. The in our atmosphere, one can imagine bringing all the ozone word ozone is derived from the Greek word óζειν (ozein), mole cules in the troposphere and stratosphere down to meaning “to smell.” Ozone has a pungent odor that allows it Earth’s surface and uniformly distributing these molecules to be detected even at very low amounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Why and How They Are Controlled
    United States Office of Air Quality EPA 456/F-99-006R Environmental Protection Planning and Standards November 1999 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Air EPA-456/F-99-006R November 1999 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Why and How They Are Controlled Prepared by Clean Air Technology Center (MD-12) Information Transfer and Program Integration Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Information Transfer and Program Integration Division of the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents of this report reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Copies of this report are available form the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161, telephone number (800) 553-6847. CORRECTION NOTICE This document, EPA-456/F-99-006a, corrects errors found in the original document, EPA-456/F-99-006. These corrections are: Page 8, fourth paragraph: “Destruction or Recovery Efficiency” has been changed to “Destruction or Removal Efficiency;” Page 10, Method 2. Reducing Residence Time: This section has been rewritten to correct for an ambiguity in the original text. Page 20, Table 4. Added Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) to the table and added acronyms for other technologies. Page 29, last paragraph: This paragraph has been rewritten to correct an error in stating the configuration of a typical cogeneration facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet: Ozone Disinfection
    United States Office of Water EPA 832-F-99-063 Environmental Protection Washington, D.C. September 1999 Agency Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Ozone Disinfection DESCRIPTION • Breakage of carbon-nitrogen bonds leading to depolymerization. Disinfection is considered to be the primary mechanism for the inactivation/destruction of TABLE 1 INFECTIOUS AGENTS pathogenic organisms to prevent the spread of POTENTIALLY PRESENT IN UNTREATED waterborne diseases to downstream users and the DOMESTIC WASTEWATER environment. It is important that wastewater be adequately treated prior to disinfection in order for Organism Disease Caused any disinfectant to be effective. Table 1 lists some common microorganisms found in domestic Bacteria wastewater and the diseases associated with them. Escherichia coli Gastroenteritis (enterotoxigenic) Leptospira (spp.) Leptospirosis Ozone is produced when oxygen (O2) molecules are dissociated by an energy source into oxygen atoms Salmonella typhi Typhoid fever and subsequently collide with an oxygen molecule to Salmonella (=2,100 serotypes) Salmonellosis form an unstable gas, ozone (O3), which is used to Shigella (4 spp.) Shigellosis (bacillary disinfect wastewater. Most wastewater treatment dysentery) plants generate ozone by imposing a high voltage Vibrio cholerae Cholera alternating current (6 to 20 kilovolts) across a Protozoa dielectric discharge gap that contains an Balantidium coli Balantidiasis oxygen-bearing gas. Ozone is generated onsite Cryptosporidium parvum Cryptosporidiosis because it is unstable and decomposes to elemental Entamoeba histolytica Amebiasis (amoebic oxygen in a short amount of time after generation. dysentery) Giardia lamblia Giardiasis Ozone is a very strong oxidant and virucide. The Helminths mechanisms of disinfection using ozone include: Ascaris lumbricoides Ascariasis • Direct oxidation/destruction of the cell wall T.
    [Show full text]