DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 China National Human Development Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 China National Human Development Report Development Report 2013 China NationalHuman China National UNDP fosters human development to empower women and men to build better lives in Human Development China. As the UN’s development network, UNDP draws on a world of experiences to assist China in developing its own solutions to the country’s development challenges. Report 2013 Through partnerships and innovation, UNDP works to achieve the rule of law, promoting environmental sustainability, and fighting HIV/AIDS. Sustainable and Liveable Cities: Toward Ecological Civilization Toward Cities: and Liveable Sustainable Toward Ecological Civilization This report is a collaboration between UNDP China and the Institute of Urban and Environmental Studies of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Special thanks go to the Royal Norwegian Embassy, the Peace and Development Foundation, Leighton Asia, Tianyan Green Energy Corporation, Stora Enso and Veolia Group for their kind sponsorships. For copies or information related to this publication, please contact us: UNDP China 2 Liangmahe Nanlu, 100600 Beijing Telephone +86-10-8532-0800 Fax +86-10-8532-0900 中国对外翻译出版有限公司中 国 出 版 集 团 公 司 ISBN 978-7-5001-3754-2 9 787500 137542 定价：69.00 元 CHINA NATIONAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2013 Sustainable and Liveable Cities: Toward Ecological Civilization The preparation of this report was a collaboration between UNDP China and Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences China Publishing Group Corporation China Translation & Publishing Corporation CIP Data China Human Development Report. 2013: Sustainable and Liveable Cities: Toward Ecological Urbanisation: English Compiled by United Nations Development Program. –Beijing: China Translation and Publishing Corporation, June 2013 ISBN 978-7-5001-3754-2 I. China… II. United… III. 1, Urbanisation –Research report –China—2013—English IV. D668 Archival Library of Chinese Publications CIP Data H.Z. (2013) No.122691 All rights reserved. Any part of this publication may be quoted, copied, or translated by indicating the source. No part of this publication may be stored for commercial purposes without prior written permission. The analysis and policy recommendations of the Report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or its Member States.The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps of the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or UNDP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published by :China Translation and Publishing Corporation Address: Floor 6, Wuhua Building, 4(A) Chegongzhuang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China Tel.: (010)68359376 68359303 68359101 68357937 Email: [email protected] Website:http://www.ctpc.com.cn Copy editor: Gretchen Luchsinger Distributor: Xinhua Bookstore Format: 880×1230 mm 1/16 Edition: August 2013, first edition Printing: August 2013, first printing ISBN 978-7-5001-3754-2 Price: RMB 69.00 All right reserved China Translation and Publishing Corporation FOREWORD In 2011 the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics announced that China’s urbanisation rate had surpassed 50 percent. For the first time in China’s long history, there were more citizens living in cities than in rural areas. Asia as a whole has not yet reached the 50 percent mark but is expected to do so by 2020, and Africa by 2035. According to UN estimates, the total number of urban dwellers worldwide is due to increase by 75 percent be- tween now and 2050, when 68 percent of the world population will be city dwellers. Most of this urban growth will occur in Asia and Africa. China’s urbanisation process is of particular importance for two main reasons: speed and scale. It took 6 decades for China’s urbanisation to expand from 10 to 50 percent. This same transition took 150 years to occur in Europe and 210 years in Latin America and Caribbean. China’s rapid urbanisation is characterized by massive internal migration. In 2011, the migrating population reached 260 million. During the next two decades, nearly 310 million more people are expected to migrate from rural to urban areas. Such speed and scale in migration is unprecedented in human history. The majority of China’s major objectives and endeavours will thus be won or lost in its cities. The battle against climate change, the fight against inequalities, and the response to a rapidly ageing population – to mention a few - will depend on measures taken within the context of China’s burgeoning cities. As China urbanises, both challenges and opportunities will arise. Pressures on multiple fronts will increase; the use of natural and energy resources, employment competition, transportation, housing, access to basic social and other public services will all expand. The way China addresses these challenges will shape not only the coun- try’s urban landscape, but also that of the entire nation. Because big parts of China’s future cities have yet to be built, huge urban and national challenges, along with huge costs, can be avoided if the right care and the right decisions are taken now. With the urban population growing at such rapid pace, China needs to develop smart city planning and a strong network of clean energy, public mass transportation, implement strict standards of energy efficiency for build- ings, and promote voluntary green actions by citizens and businesses. Given the long life span of city infrastruc- tures and buildings, impacts of China’s decisions now will be felt for next several decades. Urbanisation also pro- vides an opening to increase equal access by all to opportunities and social services and to address some of the current inequalities that are emerging as the country transitions to an economy where market mechanisms play a greater role. Cities are centres of economic and cultural development, and increasingly, culture and creativity are being recognized as essential for vibrant, liveable cities. The urgency and significance of the urbanisation process in China prompted UNDP to focus its National Human Development Report on Sustainable and Liveable Cities: Toward Ecological Civilization. The report focuses on two main questions: how can we make China’s cities more liveable, and how can we ensure that citizens better enjoy the potentials associated with urban growth? To answer these questions, the report explores the current urban transformation in China from the perspective of human development. It looks at international practices and makes recommendations and projections into the future, based on the key areas of China’s urban transfor- mation that will directly affect people. i We are aware that there have been numerous insightful studies on urbanisation in China in recent years focus- ing on subjects such as low carbon cities, urban planning, and so on. The current report does not attempt to replicate them. Rather, it explores a range of topics - health, employment, housing, social services, culture, as well as cross-sectoral issues like inequality, rural-urban linkages, the natural environment, through a sustainable human development lens. China’s political commitment to a successful urban transformation is unambiguous. The country’s leadership has placed urbanisation on top of its political agenda. The government of China is fully aware of the need to turn its attention to making sure that its cities are more liveable, more humane, and sustainable for its people. Premier Li Keqiang stated in March 2013 that the new model of urbanisation should be human-centred, and should ensure the prosperity of the people, and the quality of urbanisation. The country’s leadership adopted the policy of Ecological Civilization and is aiming to green its development trajectory as well as to nurture the countries evolving social and cultural creativity. President Xi Jinping stated in April 2013 that China will focus more on the quality and efficiency of economic development, to build a “Beauti- ful China”, and will strengthen the ecological civilization construction with more efforts toward green develop- ment, circular development and low-carbon development and to balance industrial development and green, sustainable development. Since urbanisation stands at the intersection diverse economic, social, political, cultural and environmental poli- cy streams, guiding the urbanisation process requires good governance - good policies, good division of labour and coordination - horizontally across sectors and vertically across levels of government. It also requires good cooperation between government, private sector, social organisations and citizens. This Report is a collaboration between the UNDP China and Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. It was compiled by a distinguished team of Chinese and international experts. I would like to extend my sincere thanks and warmest congratulations to all the authors and particularly Professor Pan Jiahua’s team for their outstanding work. I would also like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation and gratitude to the Royal Norwegian Embassy, the Peace and Development Foundation, Leighton Asia, Tianyan Green Energy Corporation, Stora Enso and Veolia Group for their generous donations that have made this report possible, and to the many colleagues in the United Nations System who provided valuable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modelling Quality of Life for Sustainable Development
    MODELLING QUALITY OF LIFE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT V. Varma1, G. Chattopadhyay2, M.M.K. Khan3 Process Engineering and Light Metal (PELM) Centre Faculty of Science, Engineering and Health Gladstone Campus, CQUniversity Bryan Jordan Drive, QLD-4680, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract The growing human population and the strain on natural resources are having an adverse effect on human lives. Findings from leading research organizations have highlighted that the accelerated depletion of natural capital is expected to be a big challenge for Sustainable Development (SD) of the world in the medium to long term future. SD is currently defined as, ‗Development that meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs‘. However the current trend of research indicates that this view of SD is limited. Major areas of focus for SD are economic, social and environmental. One area not reflected well in the existing models is quality of life. The rationale behind this is the complexity and difficulty in modelling. Scarcity of natural resources, potable water and the slow pace of development for alternate sources of energy coupled with the affects of climate change will drive nations around the world to conflicts. With human population estimated to reach 9 billion by 2050 there would be an adverse impact on the quality of life (QOL) of people. The Well-Being Index (WI), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), Global National Happiness (GNH) and Quality of Living are used to capture QOL, albeit with limited success. There is a need to define QOL in an easy to understand way and develop a user-friendly and practical model to provide inputs to models on SD.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Derivation of LQI
    Appendix A Derivation of LQI Abstract The Life Quality Index (LQI) is derived from economic princi- ples. The LQI can be used to estimate the societal capacity to commit re- sources to risk reduction, SCCR. The LQI, in a format simple for practical application, can be written as EKG, where G is the real GDP/person/year, E is the life expectancy and K is a constant. The societal capacity SCCR, de- rived from the LQI, equals KG/E and is described in Chap. 2. The purpose of this appendix is to describe the derivation of LQI from economic prin- ciples and to prepare for the calibration of the parameter K using economic data in Appendix C. A.1 Introduction Efficient management of risks to life safety involves the search for a bal- ance between the overall potential for harm and good outcomes. In recent years several acceptability criteria with quantitative rationales have been derived from compound social indicators (Lind et al. 1992, Nathwani et al. 1997, Rackwitz 2002, Lind 2002) to support evaluation of broad program outcomes. Lind et al. (1992) proposed the use of two key social indicators, real GDP per capita and life expectancy at birth (both also used in the UN Hu- man Development Project Index, HDI) for judging the effectiveness of de- cisions about risk and life safety. The concept was expanded by Nathwani et al. (1997) who further developed the Life Quality Index (LQI) to estab- lish a test of efficiency for programs and regulations to manage risks. The LQI is simpler than the HDI and based on well-defined component indices weighted to reflect peoples’ revealed preference for the work/non-work- time ratio and productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles for Managing Risk
    Principles for Managing Risk: A Search for Improving the Quality of Decisions J.S. Nathwani 1, N.C. Lind, M.D. Pandey Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 1 Professor (Adj), Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. N2L 3G1 Dr. Nathwani is the Senior Advisor, Strategic Development, Ontario Hydro Services Co., 700 University Ave., Toronto, ON. M5G 1X6 2 Principles for Managing Risk: A Search for Improving the Quality of Decisions J.S. Nathwani 2, N.C. Lind, M.D. Pandey Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Abstract: The prospect of disease and death command widespread attention resulting in much effort expended to reduce risk and promote safety. The aim is to develop practical and workable policies 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the seminal contributions of Prof. Ernest Siddall, Prof. Jan Narveson, and Prof. F. Kenneth Hare. Members of the Joint Committee on Health and Safety of the Royal Society of Canada and the Canadian Academy of Engineering (1990-1996) also contributed to the early development of ideas in this paper. The results and the conclusions of this study do not represent the views of any organization; we remain solely responsible for all opinions and errors in this book. 4 0.1 INTRODUCTION We consider the problems of managing risks responsibly on behalf of others. “What should we do when the safe and the dangerous are inextricably intertwined?3” It is unrealistic to seek maximum benefit without considering the risks involved, but it is just as naïve to pursue risk minimization without regards for the cost.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Canada Wide Standard for Particulate Matter and Ozone: Cost
    Canada Wide Standard for Particulate Matter and Ozone: Cost-Benefit Analysis using a Life-Quality Index M.D. Pandey1 and J.S. Nathwani 2 Institute for Risk Research University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Accepted for publication in Int. J. Risk Analysis 1 Associate Professor of Civil Engineering 2 Professor (Adj), Department of Management Sciences Dr. Nathwani is the Manager, Strategic Planning, Hydro One Inc, 483 Bay Street, Toronto, ON 1 Abstract The adverse impacts of particulate air pollution and ground level ozone on public health and the environment have motivated the development of Canada Wide Standards (CWS) on air-quality. In cost-benefit analysis of air-quality options, valuation of reduction in mortality is a critical step as it accounts for almost 80% of the total benefits and any bias in its evaluation can significantly skew the outcome of the analysis. The overestimation of benefits is a source of concern since it has the potential of diverting valuable resources from other needs to support broader health care objectives, education and social services that contribute to enhanced quality of life. We have developed a framework of reasoning for the assessment of risk reduction initiatives that would support the public interest and enhance safety and quality of life. The paper presents the Life Quality Index (LQI) as a tool to quantify the level of expenditure beyond which it is no longer justifiable to spend resources in the name of safety. It is shown that the LQI is a compound social indicator comprising societal wealth and longevity, and it is also equivalent to a utility function consistent with the basic principles of welfare economics and decision analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOOD SOCIETY FRAMEWORK: an ESSAY on UNDERSTANDING the QUALITY of LIFE Professor Patrick W
    Spring & Summer, May & August SOCIAL 2010 INDICATORS • NETWORK Number 102 & 103 ISSN 0885 6729 NEWS A Quarterly Review of Social Reports and Research on Social Indicators, Social Trends, and the Quality-of-Life. SINews Included of WorkingN Group 6ET on Social Indicators and Social Reporting of the International Sociological Association. THE GOOD SOCIETY FRAMEWORK: AN ESSAY ON UNDERSTANDING THE QUALITY OF LIFE Professor Patrick W. Jordan Fellow, Royal Society of Medicine [email protected] Good societies are those in which the food; whether work, home and public envi- QoL have been proposed and, although conditions enable their citizens to have ronments are generally safe. there is some overlap in their dimensions, a high standard of well-being. Tradition- • Peace and Security - whether crime is there is little consensus as to which is the ally, the main measures used to quantify most appropriate. a society's level of well-being have been low and people feel safe in their homes and financial measures, in particular 'stan- public areas; whether or not society is af- The indices differ both in terms of the dard of living', which is mainly a measure fected by war or terrorism. dimensions that they use and in the of people's income and spending power. • Culture and Leisure - whether there is weightings that they give to each dimen- sion. More recently, attention has been fo- a rich and rewarding culture, both 'high' and cussed on wider and more far-reaching 'popular'; whether there are opportunities to The Good Society Framework (GSF) was measures of well-being which look at participate in rewarding leisure activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Music - a Multi-Scalar Index for Evaluating Sustainability in Cities
    Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development 19 MuSIC - A Multi-scalar Index for Evaluating Sustainability in Cities Luca D'Acci and Patrizia Lombardi Politecnico di Torino, DICAS - Department 0/Housing and City Abstract It is intemationally recognized that Sustainable development is achallenging multi-stake holders process, encompassing multiple dimensions and trans­ disciplinary knowledge. The idea of sustainability dates back more than 30 years. Over these decades, govemments, communities and businesses have all responded to the challenge of sustainability to some extent. Citizens in alm ost all countries not only know the issues, but tend to feel that the quality of the environment is important both to their own wellbeing and to the common good. Despite all these efforts, when the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) released the results of a four-year global study into the state of global ecosystem services and the possible consequences of anticipated ecosystem change on human wellbeing, the board feit it necessary to present the following waming: ... the results of human activity are putting such astrain on the natural functions of Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted. According to Adams (2006), one of the reasons is the problem of metrics as a result of the desire to set targets and measure progress. Using indicators as a means for measuring or assessing the sustainability of cities and practices intended to improve sustainability is criticized for several reasons. One of the main concems is the way in which indicators are developed through often "ad hoc" processes without a structured framework or consensus on what urban sustainability is, a consensus which is still more of a political than a scientific enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture, Space, and Society in Chinese Villages, 1978-2018
    Wesleyan University The Honors College Constructing Nostalgic Futurity: Architecture, Space, and Society in Chinese Villages, 1978-2018 by Juntai Shen Class of 2018 A thesis submitted to the faculty of Wesleyan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Departmental Honors from the College of Social Studies and with Departmental Honors in Art History Middletown, Connecticut April, 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgement - 2 - [Introduction] A Playground for Minds and Actions Modern Chinese Villages - 4 - [Chapter 1] Houses as a Mirror of the Boom and Bust Liangjia’s Spontaneous Path of Architectural Development - 27 - [Chapter 2] A Socialist Paradise on Earth Huaxi’s Story of Socialist Great Revival - 59 - [Chapter 3] Intermingled Sounds of Chickens and Dogs Wencun’s Cultural and Aesthetic Experiment - 103 - [Epilogue] The Presence of Nostalgic Futurity - 135 - Research Bibliography - 144 - Image Appendix - 154 - 1 Acknowledgement This project would not have come to fruition were it not for the help of a host of gracious people along the way. Firstly, I am deeply indebted to my thesis advisors, Professors Joseph Siry and Ying Jia Tan. Professor Siry’s infinite knowledge of architectural history and global culture, as well as his incredible work efficiency and sharp criticism pushed me to become a better thinker, writer, and human being. Professor Tan’s high academic standard, and more importantly, his belief in my idea and vision gave me confidence through all the ups and downs during the writing process. I will always treasure my conversations with both about China, villages, buildings, arts, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • China National Human Development Report Special Edition
    China National Human Development Report Special Edition In Pursuit of a More Sustainable Future for All: China’s Historic Transformation over Four Decades of Human Development This report is a collaboration between United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the China Institute for Development Planning at Tsinghua University, and the State Information Center China Publishing Group Corporation China Translation & Publishing House F OREWORD Foreword 1 his Special Edition of the China egory to the high human development TNational Human Development Report category since UNDP first began analyzing marks multiple anniversaries: the 70th global HDI trends in 1990. anniversary of the founding of the People’s China already had higher social indicators Republic of China, the 40th anniversary of than the norm amongst low-income coun- China’s Reform and Opening Up, the 40th tries at the beginning of its Reform and anniversary of UNDP and UN’s presence Opening Up period due to the implemen- in China as well as the 20th anniversary tation of widespread basic health care and of the production of National Human education. The reforms that began in 1978 Development Reports in China. resulted in rapid economic development, China has made extraordinary strides in which further propelled the improve- human development from its founding in ment of social indicators. By 2000, the era 1949 and especially since the beginning of economic scarcity was effectively over of the Reform and Opening Up. China’s and the government shifted its focus to Human Development Index (HDI) value address scarcities in other areas incorpo- increased from 0.410 in 1978 to 0.752 in rating social and ecological development.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Dimensions of Quality of Life (Assessment of Environmental Indicators That Influence the Quality of Life in Indonesia)
    MSc Programme in Urban Management and Development Rotterdam, The Netherlands September 2015 Thesis Title: Environment Dimensions of Quality of Life (Assessment of Environmental Indicators that Influence the Quality of Life in Indonesia) Fitri Novitasari Supervisor: Dr. Ir. Ronald Wall Co-Supervisor: Dr. Spyridon Stavropoulos Specialization: Urban Competitiveness and Resillience MASTER’S PROGRAMME IN URBAN MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (October 2014 – September 2015) Environment dimensions of quality of life (Assessment of environmental quality dimensions that influence quality of life in Indonesia) Fitri Novitasari Indonesia Supervisor: Dr. Ir. Ronald Wall Co-Supervisor: Dr. Spyridon Stavropoulos UMD 11 Report number: 797 Rotterdam, September 2015 ii Environment Dimensions of Quality of Life (Assessment of Environmental Quality Dimensions that Influence Quality of Life in Indonesia) Summary The understanding and improvement of the human living environment have been major goals of individuals, researchers, communities and governments. The overall assessment of humans’ living environment has been commonly expressed by the term quality of life across multiple disciplines. An understanding quality of life has tremendous potential implications because improving quality of life is a major policy and sustainability goal. In order to obtain the comprehensive understanding about quality of life and sustainable development aspect, recently, several global institutions used a number of standard tools to measure aspects of environmental quality in relation to quality of life. The main purpose of the quality of life measurement is providing tangible information about what is needed for the accomplishment of a good life, value of humankind, how strong human bonds are and the relationship to the environment. As one of the prominent developing countries, Indonesia sought to expand the availability of data regarding regarding quality of life and environmental quality to support improvements on sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Land Reform: Property Rights and Land Use Xinhao Yang [email protected]
    Master in International Economic with a focus on China Chinese land reform: property rights and land use Xinhao Yang [email protected] Abstract: Is China’s “ property rights ” legislation, which distinguishes transferable “property rights” and inalienable “land ownership”, a new concept that is unknown before, or a pragmatic reversion to the individual property rights system abolished by the communist revolution? This study claims that the latter is a better exposition. As part of a “socialist market economy”, such a reversion is manifested in the legal recognition of the leasehold tenure after the “responsibility system” in agricultural production had proved to be successful. As the development of private property rights is a prelude to market transactions, land use rights reform in China should be conducive to the success of China’s economic liberalization policies, provided that there is a contemporaneous advance in the development of the polices and technical know-how, such as new land use right policy and land surveying. Key words: property rights, land reform, land ownership, private property rights, rules of law. EKHM52 Master thesis, First year (15 credits ECTS) October 2014 Supervisor: Patrick Svensson Examiner: Christer Gunnarsson 1 Acknowledgments At the point of finishing this paper, I’d like to express my sincere thanks to all those who have lent me hands in the course of my writing this paper. First of all, I'd like to take this opportunity to show my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Patrick Svensson, who has given me so much useful advices on my writing, and has tried his best to improve my paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools and Strategies for Improving Policy Responses to the Risk of Air Pollution
    TOOLS AND STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING POLICY RESPONSES 181 TOOLS AND STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING POLICY RESPONSES TO THE RISK OF AIR POLLUTION Ari Rabl1, Jatin Nathwani2, Mahesh Pandey3, Fintan Hurley4 ABSTRACT This paper offers a brief review of the need for cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and the available policy instruments for air pollution. To prioritize different possible actions, one needs to know which source of pollution causes how much damage. This requires an impact pathway analysis, i.e. an analysis of the chain emission → dispersion → dose- response function → monetary valuation. The methodology for this is described and illustrated with the results of the ExternE (External Costs of Energy) project series of the European Commission. Two examples of an application to CBA are shown: one where a proposed reduction of emission limits is justified, one where it is not. It is advisable to subject any proposed regulation to a CBA, including an analysis of the uncertainties. Even if the uncertainties are large and a policy decision may have to take other considerations into account, a well documented CBA clarifies the issues and provides a basis for rational discussion. One of the main sources of uncertainty lies in the monetary valuation of premature mortality, the dominant contribution to the damage cost of air pollution. As an alternative an innovative policy tool is described, the Life Quality Index (LQI), a compound indicator comprising societal wealth and life expectancy. It is applied to the Canada-wide standards for particulate matter and ozone. Regardless of monetary valuation, a 50% reduction of PM10 concentrations in Europe and North America has been shown to yield a population-average life expectancy increase in the order of 4 to 5 months.
    [Show full text]
  • WORKING DRAFT the Objective Vs. Subjective Debate One of The
    WORKING DRAFT The Objective vs. Subjective Debate One of the central debates in the quality of life literature revolves around whether the indicators used to measure quality of life are “subjective” or “objective” in nature and understanding the division among the literature is a useful starting point for any attempt to create a quality of life measure particularly one designed to be used as a metric of success. In the literature objective measures are defined as being based on aggregate population data have been advocated by such measures as the UNDP (2008) in their Human Development Index, and the World Bank (2009) in their World Development Indicators. Measures such as life expectancy, adult literacy rates, student enrollment ratios, and gross domestic product per capita are used to create the Human Development Index. The reasoning behind using these measures is based in the belief that the use of quantifiable aggregate measures of economic, social, health or other indicators are sufficient to gauge the quality of life for a given population. Their usage and efficacy also rest on the assumption that the indicators that are being measured are objective in the sense that they are universally seen as desirable attributes. On the other hand, subjective measures, such as those advocated by Brooks and Gill, place the measurement of quality of life in the psychological realm of satisfaction and overall happiness, which is only definable by the individual and thus can only be measured by the use of surveys to individuals. Instead of measuring what they believe to be the most important indicators of quality of life like the UNDP and World Bank do, they instead pose more open questions to the individual, which allows the respondents to express their perceived level of life quality without any bias or value weighting.
    [Show full text]