DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., Et Al.,1 ) Case No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., Et Al.,1 ) Case No Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 298 Filed 06/09/20 Entered 06/09/20 20:10:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 62 Edward O. Sassower, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice) Michael A. Condyles (VA 27807) Steven N. Serajeddini, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice) Peter J. Barrett (VA 46179) Anthony R. Grossi (admitted pro hac vice) Jeremy S. Williams (VA 77469) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Brian H. Richardson (VA 92477) KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP KUTAK ROCK LLP 601 Lexington Avenue 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1000 New York, New York 10022 Richmond, Virginia 23219-4071 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Telephone: (804) 644-1700 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 Facsimile: (804) 783-6192 Proposed Co-Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-32299 (KLP) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) DEBTORS’ APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION AND EMPLOYMENT OF ALVAREZ & MARSAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC AS RESTRUCTURING ADVISORS TO THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 327(A) AND 328(A) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 13, 2020 The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) respectfully state as follows in support of this application (this “Application”):2 1 Due to the large number of Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, for which joint administration has been granted, a complete list of the Debtor entities and the last four digits of their federal tax identification numbers is not provided herein. A complete list may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://cases.stretto.com/intelsat. The location of the Debtors’ service address is: 7900 Tysons One Place, McLean, VA 22102. 2 The detailed description of the Debtors and their business, and the facts and circumstances supporting the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases, are set forth in greater detail in the Declaration of David Tolley, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Co-Restructuring Officer of Intelsat S.A., in Support of Debtors’ Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Motions [Docket No. 6] (the “First Day Declaration”), filed contemporaneously with the Debtors’ voluntary petitions for relief filed under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) on May 13, 2020 (the “Petition Date”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Application shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the First Day Declaration or as later defined herein, as applicable. KE 68019753 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 298 Filed 06/09/20 Entered 06/09/20 20:10:41 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 62 Relief Requested 1. The Debtors seek entry of an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, (the “Order”), (a) authorizing the retention and employment of Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC together with employees of its affiliates (all of which are wholly-owned by its parent company and employees), its wholly owned subsidiaries, and independent contractors (collectively, “A&M”) as restructuring advisor for the Debtors in accordance with the terms and conditions of the engagement letter dated as of March 30, 2020 (the “Engagement Letter”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 to the Order and incorporated by reference herein, effective as of May 13, 2020, and (b) approving the terms of A&M’s employment, including the proposed compensation arrangements and the indemnification provisions set forth in the Engagement Letter, as modified pursuant to the Order, under section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. In support of this Application, the Debtors respectfully submit the declaration of Justin Schmaltz, managing director at Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC (the “Schmaltz Declaration”), which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, and respectfully state as follows in further support of this Application. Jurisdiction and Venue 2. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Court”) has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, dated August 15, 1984. The Debtors confirm their consent, pursuant to rule 7008 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), to the entry of a final order by the Court in connection with this Application to the extent that it is later determined that the Court, 2 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 298 Filed 06/09/20 Entered 06/09/20 20:10:41 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 62 absent consent of the parties, cannot enter final orders or judgments in connection herewith consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution. 3. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. 4. The bases for the relief requested herein are Bankruptcy Code sections 327(a) and 328(a), Bankruptcy Rules 2014(a) and 2016, and rules 2014-1 and 2016-1 of the Local Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the “Local Bankruptcy Rules”). Background 5. The Debtors (together with their non-Debtor affiliates, the “Company”) operate one of the world’s largest satellite services businesses, providing a critical layer in the global communications infrastructure. As the foundational architects of satellite technology, the Company operates the largest satellite fleet and connectivity infrastructure in the world. 6. Through its global and extra-terrestrial network of satellites and teleports, the Company provides diversified communications services to the world’s leading media companies, fixed and wireless telecommunications operators, data networking service providers for enterprise and mobile applications in the air and on the seas, multinational corporations and internet service providers in the most challenging and remote locations across the globe. The Company is also the leading provider of commercial satellite communication services to the U.S. government and other select military organizations and their contractors. The Company’s administrative headquarters are in McLean, Virginia, and the Company has extensive operations spanning across the United States, Europe, South America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. 7. On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors are operating their business and managing their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. 3 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 298 Filed 06/09/20 Entered 06/09/20 20:10:41 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 62 On May 15, 2020, the Court entered an order granting procedural consolidation and joint administration of these chapter 11 cases pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b). A&M’s Qualifications 8. In consideration of the size and complexity of their business, as well as the demands of the circumstances, the Debtors have determined that the services of experienced restructuring advisors will substantially enhance their attempts to maximize the value of their estates. A&M is well qualified to provide these services in light of their extensive knowledge and expertise with respect to chapter 11 proceedings. 9. A&M specializes in interim management, crisis management, turnaround consulting, operational due diligence, creditor advisory services, and financial and operational restructuring. A&M’s debtor advisory services have included a wide range of activities targeted at stabilizing and improving a company’s financial position, including developing or validating forecasts, business plans and related assessments of a business’s strategic position; monitoring and managing cash, cash flow and supplier relationships; assessing and recommending cost reduction strategies; and designing and negotiating financial restructuring packages. 10. Since its inception in 1983, A&M has been a global provider of turnaround advisory services to companies in crisis or those in need of performance improvement in specific financial and operational areas, including: In re Windstream Holdings, Inc., No. 19-22312 (RDD) (Bankr. D. SDNY April 22, 2019; In re Bristow Group Inc., No. 19-32713 (DRJ) (Bankr. D. Del. May 11, 2019); In re Southcross Energy Partners, L.P., No. 19-10702 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del. Apr. 1, 2019); In re Imerys Talc America, Inc., No. 19-10289 (LSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 13, 2019); In re Fairway Energy, LP, No. 18-12684 (LSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 26, 2018); In re Enduro Res. Partners LLC, No. 18-11174 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. May 15, 2018); In re Toys “R” Us, Inc., No. 17-34665 (KLP) (Bankr. E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2017); In re Gulfmark Offshore, Inc., No. 17-11125 4 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 298 Filed 06/09/20 Entered 06/09/20 20:10:41 Desc Main Document Page 5 of 62 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. May 26, 2017); In re Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., No. 17-10015 (KJC) (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 26, 2017); In re La Paloma Generating Co., No. 16-12700 (CSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 28, 2016); In re Erickson Inc., No. 16-34393 (HDH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2016); In re Key Energy Servs. Inc., No. 16-12306 (BLS) (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 31, 2016); In re Halcón Resources Corporation, No. 16-11724 (BLS) (Bankr. D. Del. Aug. 1, 2016); In re Seventy Seven Finance Inc., No. 16-11409 (LSS) (Bankr. D. Del. June 26, 2016); In re Southcross Holdings LP, No. 16-20111 (MI) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. May 6, 2016); In re Magnum Hunter Res. Corp., No. 15- 12533 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 28, 2016); In re Swift Energy Co., No. 15-12670 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 1, 2016); In re Offshore Grp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alma Platinum IV UBS Multi Strategy Alternatives
    Not for retail distribution. For EEA investors: This marketing material is intended for professional clients only (cf. MiFID Directive 2014/65/EU Annex II) and must be read in conjunction with the Key Investor Information Document. For Hong Kong investors, this document is solely intended for professional investors. For Swiss investors: this document is solely intended for qualified investors (Art. 10 Para. 3 of the Swiss Federal Collective Investment Schemes Act (CISA)). 30 October 2020 Alma Platinum IV UBS Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund Assets under Management: € 331,512,874 Investment Strategy Alma Platinum IV UBS Multi Strategy Alternatives ("the Fund") is a “multi-manager” fund, meaning that Alma Capital Investment Management (the "Management Company") appoints a number of sub-investment managers to each manage a segment of the assets of the Fund (Segment). UBS Hedge Fund Solutions LLC (the "Investment Adviser") advises the Management Company on selection of sub-investment managers and allocation of Fund to each Segment from time to time. The sub-investment managers will invest in a wide range of investments, using a variety of investment strategies and techniques. Among these may be i) “equity hedge” strategies, where the Fund will invest in shares of companies but use financial contracts (derivatives) to try to limit the effect of negative market movements; ii) “relative value” strategies, where the Fund will invest in across a variety of assets but will try to take advantage of mis- pricing and other opportunities to gain a return; iii) “trading strategies” where the Fund will invest in a broad range of assets (share in companies, foreign exchange, tradable debt issues by companies and governments, currencies) where a sub-investment manager believes that it can achieve a return; and iv) “credit/income” strategies where the Fund will invest in debt investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice to Holders of Notes Issued by York CLO-3 Ltd. And, As Applicable, York CLO-3 LLC and Notice to the Parties Listed on Sc
    Global Corporate Trust 214 N. Tryon Street, 26th Floor Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 Notice to Holders of Notes issued by York CLO-3 Ltd. and, as applicable, York CLO-3 LLC Rule 144A Accredited Investor Class Regulation S of Notes1 CUSIP ISIN CUSIP ISIN CUSIP ISIN Class A-R Notes 98625UAU6 US98625UAU60 G98474AK8 USG98474AK82 98625UAV4 Class B-R Notes 98625UAW2 US98625UAW27 G98474AL6 USG98474AL65 98625UAX0 Class C-R Notes 98625UAY8 US98625UAY82 G98474AM4 USG98474AM49 98625UAZ5 Class D-R Notes 98625UBA9 US98625UBA97 G98474AN2 USG98474AN22 98625UBB7 Class E-R Notes 98625VAG5 US98625VAG59 G98472AD8 USG98472AD83 98625UAH3 Class F Notes 98625VAJ9 US98625VAJ98 G98472AE6 USG98472AE66 98625UAK7 Subordinated Notes 98625VAC4 US98625VAC46 G98472AB2 USG98472AB28 98625V AD2 US98625VAD29 and notice to the parties listed on Schedule A attached hereto. Notice of Assignment of Collateral Management Agreement and Request for Consent PLEASE FORWARD THIS NOTICE TO BENEFICIAL HOLDERS Reference is made to that certain (i) Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2016 (as amended by Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of July 6, 2017, Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of August 23, 2017, and Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of April 15, 2021, and as may be further amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Indenture”), among York CLO-3 Ltd., as issuer (the “Issuer”), York CLO-3 LLC, as co-issuer (together with the Issuer, the “Co-Issuers”), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (in such capacity, the “Trustee”), and (ii) Collateral Management Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2016 (as amended by the Amendment to Collateral Management Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2017, the “Collateral Management Agreement”) by and between the Issuer and York CLO Managed Holdings, LLC, as collateral manager (the “Collateral Manager”).
    [Show full text]
  • Richest Hedge Funds the World's
    THE WORLD’S DR. BROWNSTEIN’S WINNING FORMULA RICHEST PAGE 40 CANYON’S SECRET EMPIRE HEDGE PAGE 56 CASHING IN ON CHAOS FUNDS PAGE 68 February 2011 BLOOMBERG MARKETS 39 100 THE WORLD’S RICHEST HEDGE FUNDS COVER STORIES FOR 20 YEARS, DON BROWNSTEIN TAUGHT philosophy at the University of Kansas. He special- ized in metaphysics, which examines the character of reality itself. ¶ In a photo from his teaching days, he looks like a young Karl Marx, with a bushy black beard and unruly hair. That photo is now a relic standing behind the curved bird’s-eye-maple desk in Brownstein’s corner office in Stamford, Connecticut. Brownstein abandoned academia in 1989 to try to make some money. ¶ The career change paid off. Brownstein is the founder of Structured Portfolio Man- agement LLC, a company managing $2 billion in five partnerships. His flagship fund, the abstrusely named Structured Servicing Holdings LP, returned 50 percent in the first 10 months of 2010, putting him at the top of BLOOMBERG MARKETS’ list of the 100 best-performing hedge CONTINUED ON PAGE 43 DR. BROWNSTEIN’S By ANTHONY EFFINGER and KATHERINE BURTON WINNING PHOTOGRAPH BY BEN BAKER/REDUX FORMULA THE STRUCTURED PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT FOUNDER MINE S ONCE-SHUNNED MORTGAGE BONDS FOR PROFITS. HIS FLAGSHIP FUND’S 50 PERCENT GAIN PUTS HIM AT THE TOP OF OUR ROSTER OF THE BEST-PERFORMING LARGE HEDGE FUNDS. 40 BLOOMBERG MARKETS February 2011 NO. BEST-PERFORMING 1 LARGE FUNDS Don Brownstein, left, and William Mok Structured Portfolio Management FUND: Structured Servicing Holdings 50% 2010 135% 2009 TOTAL RETURN In BLOOMBERG MARKETS’ first-ever THE 100 TOP- ranking of the top 100 large PERFORMING hedge funds, bets on mortgages, gold, emerging markets and global LARGE HEDGE FUNDS economic trends stand out.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Leading Women in Hedge Funds 2020
    Fifty Leading Women in Hedge Funds 2020 I N A S S O C I A T I O N W I T H 50 LEADING WOMEN IN HEDGE FUNDS 2020 50 LEADING WOMEN IN HEDGE FUNDS 2020 Introduction HAMLIN LOVELL, CONTRIBUTING EDITOR, THE HEDGE FUND JOURNAL his is the eighth edition of our managers of all time – according to LCF Edmond 50 Leading Women in Hedge de Rothschild analysis – namely Bridgewater Funds report and is published Associates and Lone Pine. The two Lone Pine in association with EY for the women in this year’s report are two of the three seventh time. Whilst Covid-19 portfolio managers who succeeded Lone Pine’s has denied us the opportunity founder Steve Mandel. Three of the report’s to host accompanying events discretionary equity portfolio managers specialize in London and New York, at in the healthcare and biotechnology sector, which least this year, the professional achievements has attracted more attention this year for obvious Tof the women featured in this year’s report reasons. Four of the investment professionals shine through, nonetheless. We are so pleased work for systematic and quantitative hedge fund An analysis of the S&P to be publishing this report just a few days after managers, which is notable given the general Kamala Harris made history by becoming the dearth of women in STEM. Another noteworthy first female, first black and first Asian-American cluster is three women managing multi-billion Composite 1500 found US Vice-President-elect. s the leading global evidence is clear. Having more amounts in liquid credit strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Hedge Fund and Fund of Hedge Funds Managers
    View the full Quarterly Update at: https://www.preqin.com/docs/quarterly/hf/Preqin-Quarterly-Hedge-Fund-Update-Q2-2016.pdf The Preqin Quarterly Update: Download the data pack at: Hedge Funds, Q2 2016 www.preqin.com/quarterlyupdate Largest Hedge Fund and Fund of Hedge Funds Managers Fig. 1: Top Hedge Fund Managers by Assets under Management Manager Location Year Established Assets under Management Bridgewater Associates US 1975 $147.4bn as at 31 March 2016 AQR Capital Management US 1998 $84.1bn as at 31 March 2016 Man Group UK 1983 $53.1bn as at 31 March 2016 Och-Ziff Capital Management US 1994 $42.0bn as at 1 April 2016 Standard Life Investments UK 2006 $37.7bn as at 31 March 2016 Two Sigma Investments US 2001 $35.0bn as at 31 March 2016 Winton Capital Management Ltd. UK 1997 $34.5bn as at 31 March 2016 Millennium Management US 1989 $33.0bn as at 1 March 2016 Renaissance Technologies US 1982 $32.3bn as at 31 March 2016 BlackRock Alternative Investors US 1997 $30.2bn as at 31 March 2016 Viking Global Investors US 1999 $29.0bn as at 29 February 2016 Adage Capital Management US 2001 $27.5bn as at 31 December 2015 Elliott Management US 1977 $27.0bn as at 31 December 2015 Baupost Group US 1982 $26.9bn as at 31 December 2015 D.E. Shaw & Co. US 1988 $26.0bn as at 31 March 2016 Marshall Wace UK 1997 $26.0bn as at 31 May 2016 Davidson Kempner Capital Management US 1990 $25.4bn as at 31 March 2016 Citadel Advisors US 1990 $24.0bn as at 31 March 2016 Brevan Howard Capital Management Jersey 2002 $22.1bn as at 31 March 2016 GAM UK 1983 $22.0bn as at 30 June 2015 York Capital Management US 1991 $22.0bn as at 31 December 2015 Source: Preqin Hedge Fund Online Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Manager Profile
    Principal Portfolio Strategies Manager Profile Principal Global Multi-Strategy Portfolio Sub-advised by AQR Capital Management, Wellington Management, LA Capital, Ascend Capital LLC, Loomis Sayles, Finisterre Capital LLP, Sound Point Capital Management, Graham Capital Management LP, York Capital Management, and KLS Diversified Asset Management LP Investment Philosophy and Process Portfolio Philosophy: The Principal Global Multi-Strategy portfolio (the portfolio) seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation with an emphasis on positive total Principal Portfolio Strategies1 returns and relatively low volatility. The portfolio uses a multi-sub-advisor structure is a specialized boutique that and a combination of alternative strategies in its efforts toward this goal. engages exclusively in the The investment advisor’s investment philosophy and strategy may not perform creation of asset allocation as intended and could result in a loss or gain. solutions. Principal Portfolio Strategies has an established Portfolio Management Process: Principal Portfolio Strategies is responsible market presence as a manager for the day-to-day management process of the portfolio. Our dedicated in-house of multi-asset class and/ hedge fund due diligence team is responsible for monitoring and oversight of the or multi-manager products. portfolio. Dual monitoring of the underlying sub-advisors provides an additional Additionally, the boutique layer of risk management. oversees the proprietary due The portfolio invests in a broad range of instruments including (but not limited to) diligence process for identifying, equities, bonds, currencies, convertible securities, and derivatives such as futures, selecting, and monitoring options, swaps, and forwards. The portfolio is considered non-diversified, which means investment managers. The it can invest a higher percentage of assets in securities of individual issuers than a philosophy of Principal diversified fund can.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 | E​ Vensky.Com ​ 2
    Dear Reader: MONTE CARLO We use Monte Carlo analysis extensively in our planning process. My friend Michael Kitces hit the nail on its head in his recent Newsletter. “Why I advocate the use of Monte Carlo analysis. ‘I'd rather be vaguely right than precisely wrong.’ – Keynes” GREAT ARTICLE, AS ALWAYS In “You Can’t Handle the Truth,” Larry Swedroe once again, in his classic clear and understated style addresses an important investor reality – “over confidence.” For example, he offers the summary of a study “​Why Inexperienced Investors Do Not Learn: They Do Not Know Their Past Portfolio Performance​” where the authors analyzed the actual performance of the online brokerage accounts of individual investors. ● Investors are unable to give a correct estimate of their own past portfolio performance. The correlation coefficient between return estimates and realized returns was not distinguishable from zero. ● People overrate themselves. Only 30% considered themselves average. Investors overestimated their own performance by an astounding 11.5% a year. And portfolio performance was negatively related with the absolute difference between return estimates and realized returns – the lower the returns, the worse investors were when judging their realized returns. It seems likely investors are unable to admit how badly they have done. While just 5% believed they had experienced negative returns, the reality was that 25% had done so. ● On average, investors underperform relevant benchmarks. While the arithmetic average monthly return of the benchmark was 2.0%, the mean gross monthly return of investors was just 0.5%. And more than 75% of investors underperformed. He concludes with “my personal favorite story on investor overconfidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Preqin Special Report: the Private Debt Top 100
    PREQIN SPECIAL REPORT: THE PRIVATE DEBT TOP 100 ■ The 100 Largest Fund Managers ■ The 100 Largest Institutional Investors AUGUST 2018 PREQIN SPECIAL REPORT: THE PRIVATE DEBT TOP 100 FOREWORD s reported in the 2018 Preqin Global Private Debt Report, the private debt asset class in 2017 was characterized by a trend Atowards greater capital concentration: 17% fewer funds reached a final close than in 2016, while a record $107bn was secured among fund managers. Average fund size increased to $869mn, a leap of $171mn from the previous year. Capital remains concentrated among the top GPs, as the 10 largest funds closed in 2017 secured over a third of total capital raised in the year. Institutional investor appetite for the private debt asset class is strong, with 98% of investors surveyed by Preqin at the end of 2017 planning to increase or maintain their private debt allocations in the long term. The 100 largest private debt LPs have a combined $172bn invested in the asset class, which represents nearly a quarter (22%) of all capital invested in the space. The top LPs are the main drivers behind the growth in prominence of the largest fund managers, as they require GPs to be of sufficient scale to accept and deploy increasingly large commitments. With the objective of providing greater insight into who the most influential players are, Preqin is pleased to provide a comprehensive ranking for the first time of the top 100 GPs and LPs within the private debt asset class, taken from our platform. For the purpose of this report, the GP rankings have been compiled based on the total value of private debt funds raised by each GP in the past 10 years – this includes any capital raised by owned subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum on the Asset Management Industry
    Memorandum on the Asset Management Industry JOHN CRAWFORD October 2016 WORKING PAPER This research paper was prepared for the Volcker Alliance for its project on financial sys- tem stability. The analysis and conclusions contained in this paper are those of the author and should not be interpreted as reflecting the position of the Volcker Alliance, the Al- liance Board of Directors, or the staff of the Alliance. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the author. CONTACT THE AUTHOR [email protected] © 2016 VOLCKER ALLIANCE INC. Printed November, 2016 The Volcker Alliance Inc. hereby grants a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive license to download and distribute the Volcker Alliance paper titled “Memorandum on the Asset Management Industry” (the “Paper”) for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the Paper’s copyright notice and this legend are included on all copies. MeMoranduM on the asset ManageMent Industry • Working Paper taBLE OF contentS I. BacKGrounD 1 A. Asset Management Firms 1 B. Funds. 5 C. Typography of Public Funds 7 1. Open-End Funds 7 2. Money Market Funds. 9 3. Closed-End Funds 10 4. Exchange-Traded Funds 10 5. Unit Investment Trusts 11 D. Investment Company Statistics by Legal Form and Ownership Sources 12 E. Categorization of Funds by Investment Objectives 15 F. Typography of Private Funds 19 G. Data on Private Funds and Advisers. 21 H. Separate Accounts 24 I. Adviser Compensation 26 1. Public Fund Fees 26 2. Private Fund Fees 28 3. Incentives 29 II. REGULation 30 A. Investment Company Act of 1940 (’40 Act) 31 B.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE: Dark Pools: Will Real-Time Reporting Do More Harm Than Good? P.16 Trading Floor Photos: Exclusive Images of Convergex’S Trading Floor and Technology
    0410_01.qxd 3/9/10 10:24 AM Page 1 INTELLIGENCE FOR THE ELECTRONIC MARKETS APRIL 2010 Buy-side firms are hard at work creating the trading desks of the future. York Capital Management, J.P.Morgan Asset Management and Northern Trust reveal plans for transforming their trading operations. p.22 INSIDE: Dark Pools: Will real-time reporting do more harm than good? p.16 Trading Floor Photos: Exclusive images of ConvergEx’s trading floor and technology. p.12 Gary Maier, CTO, York Capital Management A supplement to Wall Street&Technology Reach for deeper liquidity: SIGMA X Goldman Sachs Electronic Trading connects you to SIGMA X, one of the broadest sources of liquidity. Our ATS is built on the strength of the diverse GSET client base, providing you with superior access to high- quality liquidity. Access SIGMA X through our algorithmic trading strategies, by participating in our point-in- time crossing sessions, or by routing orders directly to the ATS – the choice is yours. The quality liquidity you can discover within SIGMA X can drive better execution and better results. To find out more about how Goldman Sachs Electronic Trading can connect you to people, technology and liquidity across the globe, visit gset.gs.com. ©2009, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. All rights reserved. B:8” T:7.75” S:7” FAST IS AS SLOW AS WE GO. B:10.75” S:9.75” THINK FAST, THINK BLOOMBERG. T:10.5” Speed is in everything we do, from ensuring our data feeds are the fastest in the world to building applications that meet immediate market demands in hours and days, not weeks and months.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Environmental, Social and Governance Activity 2019 ESG REPORT Disclaimer/Risk Factors
    Annual Report on Environmental, Social and Governance Activity 2019 ESG REPORT Disclaimer/Risk Factors General The information presented is current as of the date noted and is being provided at your request and is for your exclusive and confidential use only. It may not be redistributed or reproduced. This report was developed to provide the annual update of York Capital’s Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) activity for 2019. It is not for the purposes of providing financial performance in any way. Future activities or events may differ from items described in this report without notice. This report should not be relied upon for indications of future activity by the Firm. This should not be read as an offer to sell or a solicitation related to any of York Capital’s funds or investments. Specific investments discussed do not represent all past investments. It should not be assumed that any of the investment opportunities discussed were or will be profitable. Delivery or discussion of this presentation should not be construed as an offer or commitment of any sort. Under no circumstances should it be construed as an advertisement. Nothing contained herein should be construed as legal, business or tax advice. No representation or warranty, express or implied is made or given by York Capital Management as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation. The information and content of this document has been prepared by York Capital Management. York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, is a SEC registered investment adviser, and certain of its affiliated entities are authorized and regulated by one of the following: the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation Division of Insurance
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS REGULATION DIVISION OF INSURANCE SUFFOLK, ss. DOCKET NO. F2007-01 _______________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE ACQUISITION OF CONTROL OF AMERICAN EMPLOYERS’ INSURANCE COMPANY BY SPARTA INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. _______________________________________ DECISION AND ORDER I. Introduction On April 2, 2007, SPARTA Insurance Holdings, Inc., (the “Applicant” or “SPARTA”), together with certain shareholders of the Applicant (collectively referred to as “co-Applicants”) submitted an application to the Massachusetts Division of Insurance (“the Division”) on Form A pursuant to section 206B of Chapter 175 of the Massachusetts General Laws ("§ 206B") and 211 CMR 7.00, seeking approval of its plan to acquire control of American Employers’ Insurance Company (the “Insurer” or “AEIC”), a Massachusetts domestic insurance company. SPARTA was formed under the laws of the state of Delaware as a limited liability company effective September 29, 2006 and formerly was known as SPARTA Insurance Holdings, LLC (“SPARTA LLC”). Pursuant to a Certificate of Conversion dated March 7, 2007 filed with the Secretary of State in Delaware, SPARTA LLC converted from a limited liability company to a corporation named SPARTA Insurance Holdings, Inc., under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. SPARTA was formed for the purpose of acquiring and maintaining an insurance company subsidiary that will provide certain commercial lines insurance products. - 1 - The co-Applicants own,
    [Show full text]