DOCSLIB.ORG

ISOFAR EXPO South Korea 2015 Hall 1 to 10 Printed Sent.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISOFAR EXPO South Korea 2015 Hall 1 to 10 Printed Sent.Pdf Goesan County Chungbuk Province, Republic of Korea WORLD ORGANIC EXPO (WOE) 2015 www.isofar.org IMPRINT CONTACT/COORDINATION Prof. Dr. Ulrich Köpke (ukiol@uni‐bonn.de) Institute of Organic Agriculture Katzenburgweg 3 D‐53115 Bonn Tel. +49‐2 28‐73‐56 16 Fax +49‐2 28‐73‐56 17 E‐Mail: iol@uni‐bonn.de www.iol.uni‐bonn.de Layout: Hannah Becker Christian Dahn Susanne Geuer July, 2013 2 Content Hall 1 ‐ Healthy and resilient soil ………………….. ............................. 5 Hall 2 ‐ Clean water……………………………….. ....................................... 49 Hall 3 & 4 ‐ Clean air and mitigation of climate change……………………………………………………………. .......................... 69 Hall 5 ‐ Enriched biodiversity……………………….. ............................ .99 Hall 6 ‐ Animal welfare………………………………… ........................... 125 Hall 7 ‐ Optimal product and process quality.. ........................... 139 Hall 8 ‐ General human well‐being……………… ............................. 199 Hall 9 ‐ Organic lifestyle……………………………… ............................ 225 Hall 10 ‐ Practical skills for Organic Agriculture… ................... 365 3 4 Goesan County Chungbuk Province, Republic of Korea WORLD ORGANIC EXPO (WOE) 2015 Hall 1 Healthy and resilient soil Authors: Prof. Dr. Mohammed BenKheder and Prof. Dr. Ulrich Köpke www.isofar.org 5 Content A Mission: ..................................................................................................... 8 B Contents .................................................................................................... 9 B 1 Soil fertility – Soil quality .............................................................. 10 B 2 Nutrient management in Organic Agriculture ....................... 10 B3 The prominent role of Soil Organic matter (SOM) – Humus11 B 3.1 Role and function of organic matter .............................................. 12 B 3.2 Maintaining and increasing SOM ..................................................... 13 B 3.3 Cropping systems role – crop rotation design (B 2, i.) ...... 13 B 4 Nitrogen fixation............................................................................... 14 B 5 Mobilizing nutrients – increasing the soil‐root interfac ..... 15 B 5.1 Weathering /Unlocking soil‐nutrients .................................. 15 B 6 Reducing nutrient losses, nitrate leaching .............................. 16 B 7 Inhibit weed growth ........................................................................ 16 B 8 Cover crops and green fallow benefits ..................................... 16 B 9 Tillage and soil conservation ....................................................... 16 B 9.1 The mouldboard plough: ........................................................... 16 B 9.2 Reduced tillage intensity ........................................................... 17 B 10 Soil Biology....................................................................................... 17 B 10.1 Intact soil life: .............................................................................. 17 B 10.2 Abundance of soil organisms: ......................................................... 17 B 10.3 The multifunctional role of soil organisms: .......................... 17 B 10.4 Beneficial plant‐microbial interactions: symbiosis and ... association: .................................................................................................................. 18 B 10.5 Crop protection effects ............................................................. 18 B 11 Controlling, maintaining and monitoring soil fertility ..... 18 B 11.1 Assessing soil quality on‐site: ................................................ 18 B 12 Off‐farm purchased nutrients – manures and fertilizers 19 B 12.1 Basics and principles of use.............................................................. 19 B 12.2 Optimized application .............................................................. 19 B 12.3 Organic nitrogen fertilizers: which, how much, where, ... and when? ..................................................................................................................... 19 B 12.4 Mineral non‐N‐fertilizers ........................................................ 19 6 B 12.5 Organic fertilizers for soil conditioning (basal dressing), supplying nutrients, foliar spray ….. ........................................................... 19 C Central displays .................................................................................... 19 C 1 Sidewall 1: Soil as a life natural body and living entity ....... 20 C 2 Sidewall 2: Soil fertility building ................................................. 20 C 3 Sidewall 3: Cropping systems – crop rotations ...................... 20 C 4 Sidewall 4: Soil conservation ........................................................ 21 C 5. Middle of the hall: ............................................................................ 22 C 5.1 Living stands/plots: ..................................................................... 22 C 5.2 ‘The World of Compost’ ............................................................... 22 C 5.3 The Soil Counter: ........................................................................... 22 IMPRINT ...................................................................................................... 23 CONTACT/COORDINATION .................................................................. 23 7 Hall N°: 1 Title: Healthy and resilient soil A Mission: giving extensive insight to… The keyrole of soil fertility in Organic Agriculture Preserving the soil as the most important resource for agricultural production Healthy soil through organic production systems produces healthy crop that fosters the health of animal and people The organic farmer as a provider of soil conservation /maintainer of soil /manager of soil resilience Tools and technologies that are used in Organic Agriculture to provide and safeguard high soil quality Maintain and/or improve biological, physical and chemical soil fertility by wider and more diversified crop rotation, well‐focused used of organic manure (leguminous green manure) Improved organic matter management and soil health The increase of food production is needed to feed a rapidly increasing world population. The primary purpose of consumers in his choices for esculents and foods is for improved human health and well‐being. Warranting healthy and resilient soil, organic product assurance systems and balanced living and ecological systems and cycles will ensure consumer’s expectations and satisfaction concerning process quality. A crucial component in this endeavor is improvement and maintenance of soil fertility. Organic Agriculture harmonizes the interests of sustainable/perpetuable ecological production, soil conservation, and natural balances. The hall shall display: ‐ The contribution of Organic Agriculture to reach the objective of healthy, fertile, biologically active, and resilient soil with improved structure and enhanced nutrient availability. ‐ Strategies and innovative technologies of soil fertility building in Organic Agriculture. 8 Overall view: Soil as a life natural body and living entity, an ecosystem carrying and containing a broad spectrum of living organisms Soil as the main source of nutrients and medium to feed plants The optimization of soil ‐ root interactions for nutrient management Soil as a basis for biodiversity, food and life An old English saying: Live as if you would die tomorrow, Farm as you would live forever The shortest definition of Organic Agriculture ‘To fulfil our obligations to our descendents and to stabilize our communities, each generation should sustain its resources at a high level and hand them along undiminished’ (William A.Duerr 1968) Features of Organic Agriculture impact on soil conservation management. Various soil functions will be presented on photos, posters and scientific imprints: i.e. ‐ Crop rotations systems for fertility building including legumes, and green manure ‐ Different sources and values of organic matter: crop residues, animal manure/solid/liquid, compost, compost tea, organic fertilizers ….. ‐ High activities of micro and macro‐organisms ‐ Measures for preventing soil erosion and soil degradation ‐ The role of the topsoil ‐ The role of the subsoil – where the hidden half of the soil meets the hidden part of the plant: the rizosphere/drilosphere: typical processes, effect on water and nutrient uptake, mobilizing nutrients from the solid phase B Contents Delivered message: ‘Feed the soil and the soil will feed the plants. The healthy soil results in healthy plants, healthy animals and healthy people’. The ultimate goal is to reach a perpetuity of high soil quality. 9 B 1 Soil fertility – Soil quality Soil fertility is a function of soil use and management, i.e. the ability of soil to sustain crop growth in the long term Soil quality in Organic Agriculture is the capacity to function within the farm boundaries in order to sustain biological productivity and biodiversity, maintain and enhance quality of water, air and climate as well as to promote human health and habitation Soil fertility in Organic Agriculture consists of: i. Production functions, i.e. efficient sustainable net production of crops combined in diversified crop rotations, and ii. Ecological functions, i.e. filter‐ and buffer function of the soil, self‐regulation, resilience and resilience/system stability. Soil fertility has major and measurable impacts to the environment, amongst others the quality of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arrowroot Production and Utilization in the Marshall Islands
    J. Ethnobiol. 14(2):211-234 Winter 1994 TRADITIONAL ARROWROOT PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION IN THE MARSHALL ISLANDS DIRK H. R. SPENNEMANN Johnstone Centre of Parks, RecreJltion, and Heritage Charles Sturt University p. 0. Box 789 Albury, NSW 2640 Australia ABSTRACT.-This paperexamines the traditional and modern role of Polynesian arrowroot (Tacca leontopetaloides) in the subsistence and market economy of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, a group of atolls in the central equatorial Pacific Ocean. The plant is discussed in its biological and nutritional parameters. Aspects of traditional arrowroot production, starch extraction, and food preparation are examined. In the final section the potential role of the root crop in modern Mar­ shallese society is discussed. RESUMEN.-Este trabajo examina el papel tradicional y moderno de Tacca leon­ topetaloides en la economfa de subsistencia y de mercado en la Republica de las Islas Marshall, un grupo de Islas coralinas en el Oceano Pacifico ecuatoria1 cen­ tral. Se discuten los parimetros biol6gicos y nutricionales de esta planta, y se examinan los aspectos de la producci6n tradicional, la extracci6n de almid6n y la preparaci6n como alimento. En la secci6n final se discute el papel potencial de este cu1tivo en 1a sociedad moderna de las Islas Marshall. REsUME.-Nous examinons les roles traditionels et modernes de l'arrowroot Polynesien (raWl leontopetaloides) dans la subsistance et I'economie de la Repub­ Iique des Ilsles Marshalles, un groupe d'attoUs de l'Ocean Pacifique Equatorial Central. Les parametres biologiques et nutritifs de cette plante sont consideres. NOllS examinons dif£erents aspects de production traditionelle d'arrowroot, ainsi que I'extraction de la £ecule et Ia preparation des aliments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Environmental Benefits Supplied by Agri-Environment Schemes
    A review of environmental benefits supplied by agri-environment schemes FST20/79/041 Nigel Boatman, Carmel Ramwell, Hazel Parry, Naomi Jones, Julie Bishop, Peter Gaskell, Christopher Short, Jane Mills & Janet Dwyer 15 August 2008 www.lupg.org.uk The Land Use Policy Group The Land Use Policy Group (LUPG) of the UK statutory nature conservation, countryside and environment agencies comprises the Countryside Council for Wales, Natural England, Environment Agency, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, Joint Nature Conservation Committee and Scottish Natural Heritage. The LUPG aims to advise on policy matters of common concern related to agriculture, woodlands and other rural land uses. It seeks to improve understanding of the pros and cons of policy mechanisms related to land use, particularly farming and forestry; to develop a common view of desirable reforms to existing policies; and to promote these views. www.lupg.org.uk Countryside Council for Wales The Countryside Council for Wales champions the environment and landscapes of Wales and its coastal waters as sources of natural and cultural riches, as a foundation for economic and social activity, and as a place for leisure and learning opportunities. It aims to make the environment a valued part of everyone's life in Wales. www.ccw.gov.uk Natural England Natural England is the statutory body working to conserve and enhance England's natural environment, for its intrinsic value, the wellbeing and enjoyment of people and the economic prosperity that it brings. Its role is to ensure that England's unique natural environment, including its land, flora and fauna, freshwater and marine environments, geology and soils are protected and improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Ewe Lamb in the Local Village Show Where Most of the Exhibits Were Taken from the Fields on the Day of the Show
    Cotswold Sheep Society Newsletter Registered Charity No. 1013326 ` Autumn 2011 Hampton Rise, 1 High Street, Meysey Hampton, Gloucestershire, GL7 5JW [email protected] www.cotswoldsheepsociety.co.uk Council Officers Chairman – Mr. Richard Mumford Vice-Chairman – Mr. Thomas Jackson Secretary - Mrs. Lucinda Foster Treasurer- Mrs. Lynne Parkes Council Members Mrs. M. Pursch, Mrs. C. Cunningham, The Hon. Mrs. A. Reid, Mr. R Leach, Mr. D. Cross. Mr. S. Parkes, Ms. D. Stanhope Editors –John Flanders, The Hon. Mrs. Angela Reid Pat Quinn and Joe Henson discussing the finer points of……….? EDITORIAL It seems not very long ago when I penned the last editorial, but as they say time marches on and we are already into Autumn, certainly down here in Wales the trees have shed many of their leaves, in fact some began in early September. In this edition I am delighted that Joe Henson has agreed to update his 1998 article on the Bemborough Flock and in particular his work with the establishment to the RBST. It really is fascinating reading and although I have been a member of the Society since 1996 I have learnt a huge amount particularly as one of my rams comes from the RASE flock and Joe‟s article fills in a number of gaps in my knowledge. As you will see in the AGM Report, Pat Quinn has stepped down as President and Robert Boodle has taken over that position with Judy Wilkie becoming Vice President. On a personal basis, I would like to thank Pat Quinn for her willing help in supplying articles for the Newsletter and the appointment of Judy Wilkie is a fitting tribute to someone who has worked tirelessly over many years for the Society – thank you and well done to you both.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwartheg Prydeinig Prin (Ba R) Cattle - Gwartheg
    GWARTHEG PRYDEINIG PRIN (BA R) CATTLE - GWARTHEG Aberdeen Angus (Original Population) – Aberdeen Angus (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Belted Galloway – Belted Galloway British White – Gwyn Prydeinig Chillingham – Chillingham Dairy Shorthorn (Original Population) – Byrgorn Godro (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol). Galloway (including Black, Red and Dun) – Galloway (gan gynnwys Du, Coch a Llwyd) Gloucester – Gloucester Guernsey - Guernsey Hereford Traditional (Original Population) – Henffordd Traddodiadol (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Highland - Yr Ucheldir Irish Moiled – Moel Iwerddon Lincoln Red – Lincoln Red Lincoln Red (Original Population) – Lincoln Red (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Northern Dairy Shorthorn – Byrgorn Godro Gogledd Lloegr Red Poll – Red Poll Shetland - Shetland Vaynol –Vaynol White Galloway – Galloway Gwyn White Park – Gwartheg Parc Gwyn Whitebred Shorthorn – Byrgorn Gwyn Version 2, February 2020 SHEEP - DEFAID Balwen - Balwen Border Leicester – Border Leicester Boreray - Boreray Cambridge - Cambridge Castlemilk Moorit – Castlemilk Moorit Clun Forest - Fforest Clun Cotswold - Cotswold Derbyshire Gritstone – Derbyshire Gritstone Devon & Cornwall Longwool – Devon & Cornwall Longwool Devon Closewool - Devon Closewool Dorset Down - Dorset Down Dorset Horn - Dorset Horn Greyface Dartmoor - Greyface Dartmoor Hill Radnor – Bryniau Maesyfed Leicester Longwool - Leicester Longwool Lincoln Longwool - Lincoln Longwool Llanwenog - Llanwenog Lonk - Lonk Manx Loaghtan – Loaghtan Ynys Manaw Norfolk Horn - Norfolk Horn North Ronaldsay / Orkney - North Ronaldsay / Orkney Oxford Down - Oxford Down Portland - Portland Shropshire - Shropshire Soay - Soay Version 2, February 2020 Teeswater - Teeswater Wensleydale – Wensleydale White Face Dartmoor – White Face Dartmoor Whitefaced Woodland - Whitefaced Woodland Yn ogystal, mae’r bridiau defaid canlynol yn cael eu hystyried fel rhai wedi’u hynysu’n ddaearyddol. Nid ydynt wedi’u cynnwys yn y rhestr o fridiau prin ond byddwn yn eu hychwanegu os bydd nifer y mamogiaid magu’n cwympo o dan y trothwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    27 2000 ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES INFORMATION BULLETIN D’INFORMATION SUR LE RESSOURCES GÉNÉTIQUES ANIMALES BOLETIN DE INFORMACION SOBRE RECURSOS GENETICOS ANIMALES Food Organisation Organización and des de las Agriculture Nations Naciones Organization Unies Unidas of pour para la the l'alimentation Agricultura United et y la Nations l'agriculture Alimentatción Initiative for Initiative pour Iniciativa para Domestic la Diversité la Diversidad Animal des Animaux de los Animales Diversity Domestiques Domésticos The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Les appellations employées dans cette publication et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’ Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. Las denominaciones empleadas en esta publicación y la forma en que aparecen presentados los datos que contiene no implican, de parte de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades o zonas, o de sus autoridades, ni respecto de la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    "First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources" (SoWAnGR) Country Report of the United Kingdom to the FAO Prepared by the National Consultative Committee appointed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Contents: Executive Summary List of NCC Members 1 Assessing the state of agricultural biodiversity in the farm animal sector in the UK 1.1. Overview of UK agriculture. 1.2. Assessing the state of conservation of farm animal biological diversity. 1.3. Assessing the state of utilisation of farm animal genetic resources. 1.4. Identifying the major features and critical areas of AnGR conservation and utilisation. 1.5. Assessment of Animal Genetic Resources in the UK’s Overseas Territories 2. Analysing the changing demands on national livestock production & their implications for future national policies, strategies & programmes related to AnGR. 2.1. Reviewing past policies, strategies, programmes and management practices (as related to AnGR). 2.2. Analysing future demands and trends. 2.3. Discussion of alternative strategies in the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 2.4. Outlining future national policy, strategy and management plans for the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 3. Reviewing the state of national capacities & assessing future capacity building requirements. 3.1. Assessment of national capacities 4. Identifying national priorities for the conservation and utilisation of AnGR. 4.1. National cross-cutting priorities 4.2. National priorities among animal species, breeds,
    [Show full text]
  • Malama `Āina: a Conversation About Maui's Farming Future
    MALAMA `INA: A CONVERSATION ABOUT MAUI’S FARMING FUTURE A PROJECT OF THE MAUI TOMORROW FOUNDATION Looking towards Iao Valley Prepared for Maui Tomorrow Foundation, Inc. March 8, 2016 Report by Permaculture Design International LLC Copyright 2016 by Maui Tomorrow Foundation, Inc. rural lifestyle. Table of Contents FARM ENTERPRISE OPPORTUNITIES 28 INTRODUCTION 1 A Brief Overview of Maui’s “Central Valley” CONCLUSION 35 and Sugarcane 2 REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE 3 APPENDICES 36 Climate Change and Regenerative Agriculture 5 Regenerative Agricultural Land Use Potential and Transition Strategy 6 Transition to Regenerative Agriculture 9 Mainframe Design 13 Methods to Reduce Overhead 13 Livestock and Holistic Management 14 16 Case Studies and Precedents 17 19 Biofuels 20 WATER AND SOIL 22 Water 22 Soil 24 Soil Building Strategies and Bioremediation 25 Cover illustration by Silvia Yordanova Copyright 2016 by Maui Tomorrow Foundation, Inc. INTRODUCTION - love and respect the land, make it yours and claim stewardship for it keep large tracts of contiguous farmland intact, and make farming more affordable. Maui’s - care for and nurture the land farming future is tied to this land. so it can give back all we need to sustain life for ourselves and our future generations people moving forward? For 150 years Maui -Puanani Rogers, Ho`okipa Network agriculture has been large-scale, mono-crop, chemical dependent, and export oriented. Beloved Maui is at a crossroads. The January Laguna Blanca, Argentina. Twelve years after transi- Can a new farming model bring both economic 2016 announcement by Alexander and Baldwin (A&B) that Hawaiian Commercial http://www.tompkinsconservation.org/farm_laguna_ & Sugar (HC&S) will be ending their 36,000 blanca.htm concerned about the loss of jobs for so many families, and want to see Maui’s agricultural wide open to a much-needed conversation legacy continue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoneleigh Herd
    HERD FEATURE THE STONELEIGH HERD The Stoneleigh Herd of Sussex cattle was founded in 2002, a year after Debbie Dann and Alan Hunt had bought the RASE’s herd of rare breed White Park Cattle. White Parks, for all their good looks and photogenic charm, are not the most commercial of breeds so they wanted a breed to complement the White Parks and that would pay the bills and ensure the cattle weren’t just a glorified hobby. After looking at a number of native breeds the selection was narrowed down to South Devons and Sussex (Debbie is originally from Hersmonceux in East Sussex). Sussex easily trumped the South Devons! The dispersal of Mike Cushing’s Coombe Ash Herd in May 2002 provided the ideal opportunity to buy some foundation cows and four cows with calves at foot and back in calf again found themselves travelling up the M40 to Warwickshire. Coombe Ash Godinton 5th, bought as a calf at foot from the Coombe Ash dispersal sale and her heifer calf summer 2013 Debbie’s day job at that time was to run all the competitive classes for the Royal Show and Alan was and still is the Estate Manager for the Royal Showground’s farmland. Since 2007 Debbie has been Breed Secretary for the Longhorn Cattle Society. This means that both Alan and Debbie have full time jobs and the cattle are mostly managed outside of work hours and have to be pretty low maintenance. Stoneleigh Godinton 2nd and calf Cows are housed over the winter as all the grazing is rented and the cattle are easier to manage when they are indoors when the owners are working full time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Grazing by Irish Moiled and Dexter Cattle on Soft Rush
    The impact of grazing by Irish Moiled and Dexter cattle on soft rush (Juncus effusus) Áine O’Reilly Grazing Animals Project 2012 1 Table of Contents Aim…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….......6 2. Literature Review………………………………………………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.1 Soft Rush (J.effusus) ecology and lifecycle………………………………………………….....7 2.1.2 Nutritional values of soft rush………………………………………………………………………8 2.2 The control of soft rush…………………………………………………………………………………..9 2.2.1 The role of the grazing animal in controlling soft rush…………………………………10 2.2.2 The use of goats to control rush infested pasture………………………………………...11 2.2.3 The effect of grazing on soft rush………………………………………………………………..12 2.2.4 The effect of pattern and severity of cutting on the vigour of soft rush………….13 2.2.5 The use of herbicides in controlling soft rush………………………………………………14 2.3 Matching livestock to desired outcomes in pastures……………………………………….14 2.3.1 The use of traditional cattle in grazing systems…………………………………………...14 2.3.2 Age, sex and size effects……………………………………………………………………………...15 2.3.3 Grazing pressure………………………………………………………………………………………..16 2.3.3 The effects of learning experience on diet……………………………………………………16 3. Materials and methods……………………………………………………………………………………………….18 3.1 Site details and treatments……………………………………………………………………………18 3.2 Animals………………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 3.3 Sward measurements……………………………………………………………………………………20 4. Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….21
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Inheritance . I . Color'
    CATTLE INHERITANCE . I. COLOR' HEMAN L . IBSEN Kansas A gricdtural Experiment Station. Manhattan. Kansas Received January 31. 1933 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ......................... 442 COLORGENES ................................................................... 442 Red, R ....................................................................... 442 Black, B ..................................................................... 443 Black Spotting, Bs ............................................................ 443 Modifiers: much black, M, little black, L ....................................... 444 Brindle, Br .................................................................. 445 Intensity and dilution: I and i; D and d ....................................... 447 Self and recessive white spotting, S and s ........................................ 448 Modifiers of s: little white, Lw, much white, Zw ....................... ......... 449 pigmented leg, PI, unpigmented leg, pZ ............................ 449 Roan, N ..................................................................... 451 Roan modifier, rm .... .................................. 454 Recessive white (Nellore cattle), ?evz ............................................. 455 Dominant white (Park cattle), W'p ............................................. 457 Dominant white spotting ....................................................... 458 1 . Hereford pattern, SH...................................................... 458 Modifiers: little white, Lw,much white, Zm ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Report
    EXHIBIT A ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK & POULTRY COMMISSION #1 NATURAL RESOURCES DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 501-907-2400 Complaint Report Type of Complaint Received By Date Assigned To COMPLAINANT PREMISES VISITED/SUSPECTED VIOLATOR Name Name Address Address City City Phone Phone Inspector/Investigator's Findings: Signed Date Return to Heath Harris, Field Supervisor DP-7/DP-46 SPECIAL MATERIALS & MARKETPLACE SAMPLE REPORT ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD Pesticide Division #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Insp. # Case # Lab # DATE: Sampled: Received: Reported: Sampled At Address GPS Coordinates: N W This block to be used for Marketplace Samples only Manufacturer Address City/State/Zip Brand Name: EPA Reg. #: EPA Est. #: Lot #: Container Type: # on Hand Wt./Size #Sampled Circle appropriate description: [Non-Slurry Liquid] [Slurry Liquid] [Dust] [Granular] [Other] Other Sample Soil Vegetation (describe) Description: (Place check in Water Clothing (describe) appropriate square) Use Dilution Other (describe) Formulation Dilution Rate as mixed Analysis Requested: (Use common pesticide name) Guarantee in Tank (if use dilution) Chain of Custody Date Received by (Received for Lab) Inspector Name Inspector (Print) Signature Check box if Dealer desires copy of completed analysis 9 ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY COMMISSION #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 (501) 225-1598 REPORT ON FLEA MARKETS OR SALES CHECKED Poultry to be tested for pullorum typhoid are: exotic chickens, upland birds (chickens, pheasants, pea fowl, and backyard chickens). Must be identified with a leg band, wing band, or tattoo. Exemptions are those from a certified free NPIP flock or 90-day certificate test for pullorum typhoid. Water fowl need not test for pullorum typhoid unless they originate from out of state.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]