DOCSLIB.ORG

THE LUCIANIC RECENSION of the GREEK BIBLE 1 Among the Several

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE LUCIANIC RECENSION of the GREEK BIBLE 1 Among the Several CHAPTER ONE THE LUCIANIC RECENSION OF THE GREEK BIBLE 1 Among the several scholars of the ancient Church who occupied themselves with the textual criticism of the Bible, one of the most influential was Lucian of Antioch. Though not as learned or as productive in a literary way as either Origen or Jerome, Lucian's work on the text of the Greek Bible proved to be of significance both in his own day and, to an even greater extent, during the centuries following. In fact, his recension of the text of the New Testament, with only minor modifications, continued to be used widely down to the nineteenth century, and still lives on in the so-called Ecclesiastical text of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Little is known of the life of Lucian of Antioch. Born probably at Samosata in Syria about the middle of the third century, he was educated at Edessa under a certain Macarius, who, according to Suidas, was a learned expounder of holy Scripture. After a period when he may have studied at Caesarea, Lucian transferred to the famous theological school of Antioch, of which he and Chrysostom, Diodorus, Theodoret, and Theodore of Mopsuestia were to be some of the more distinguished alumni. Apparently Lucian was in sympathy with the theological views of his fellow townsman, Paul of Samosata, and when Paul was deposed for Christological heresy in A.D. 268 (or 270), he too with­ drew from the Church. During his later years Lucian seems to have become more orthodox, and under the episcopate of Cyril of Antioch (A.D. 283-304) he was restored to ecclesiastical fellowship. He died in the peace of the Church, suffering martyrdom for the faith at Nicomedia, Bithynia, probably on January 7, 312. Many are the historical and theological problems connected with the person and influence of Lucian of Antioch. The question has even been raised as to whether Lucian the excommunicated heretic was the same person as Lucian the martyr and Biblical scholar. 2 1 The substance of this chapter was presented as a lecture at the Sym­ posium on Antioch of Syria held during May, 1959, at the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. 2 This view, suggested earlier by Ceillier, Fleury, De Broglie, and Oikono­ mos, has been revived by D. S. Balanos in Ilp(Xx-nxcx -t'ij<; 'Ax(X37)µ((X<; 'A67)v&v, 2 THE LUCIANIC RECENSION OF THE GREEK BIBLE There is no need, however, to suppose the existence of two Lucians, one orthodox and one heretical; the somewhat conflicting reports can be easily reconciled by the assumption that Lucian was a critical scholar whose views on the Trinity and on Christology differed from what was later defined at Nicea as the orthodox position, but that he wiped out all stains of doctrinal aberrations by his heroic confession and martyrdom.1 It is quite understandable that during his connection with the school at Antioch he exerted a pervasive influence upon the theological views of those who came to adopt Arian theology. Indeed, Arius himself, a former pupil of Lucian's, declared (in a letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia) that he was merely following Lucian's views regarding Christology. Along with Arius, other sympathizers of Lucian's point of view-such as Eusebius of Nicomedia, Maris of Chalcedon, Leontius of Antioch, Eudoxius, Theognis of Nicaea, Asterius-became a closely-knit group that were dubbed "Collucianists." It is, however, not the vicissitude of doctrinal disputes 2 that is our concern here, but the part that Lucian played in editing the text of the Greek Bible. Though not a little has been written on the subject, it is unfortunate that, with only a few exceptions,3 scholars have confined their attention either to problems relating to his recension of the Greek Old Testament or to those relating to the New Testament. Such restrictions of interest have worked to the disadvantage of both groups of scholars. Just as the grammarian and the lexicographer of the New Testament can learn much from an examination of the language of the Septuagint, so too the tex- vn (1932), 306-3II, and by Gustave Bardy, Recherches sur saint Lucien d'Antioche et son ecole (Paris, 1936). 1 So, for example, Albert Ehrhard, Die Kirche der Miirtyrer (Munich, 1932), pp. 304f., and Adhemar d'Ales, "Autour de Lucien d'Antioche," Melanges de l'universite Saint Joseph (Beyrouth), xx1 (1937), 185-199, who point out that it is extremely unlikely that two persons of the same name should have played important roles in Antioch at the same time without leaving in the sources a trace of their differentiation from each other. 2 For discussions of Lucian from a doctrinal point of view, reference may be made to E. Buonaiuti, "Luciano martire, la sua dottrina e la sua scuola," Rivista storico-critica delle scienze teologiche, 1908, pp. 830-836, 909-923; 1909, pp. 104-II8; Friedrich Loofs, Das Bekenntnis Lucians, des Miirtyrers ( = Sitzungsberichte der koniglich preussischen A kademie der W issenschajten, Berlin, 1915), pp. 576-603; Adolf von Harnack, Dogmengeschichte, 5te Aufl., II (Tiibingen, 1931), 187-190; and, especially, Bardy, op. cit. 3 E.g. M. Spanneut's recent study, "La Bible d'Eustathe d'Antioche - Contribution a l'histoire de la 'version lucianique,' " Studia Patristica, ed. F. L. Cross, 1v (TU, LXXIX [Berlin, 1961]), 171-190. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Protestant Missionary Network in Ottoman Turkey, 1876-1914
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 6(1); April 2014 The American Protestant Missionary Network in Ottoman Turkey, 1876-1914 Devrim Ümit PhD Assistant Professor Founding and Former Chair Department of International Relations Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Karabuk University Turkey Abstract American missionaries have long been the missing link in the study of the late Ottoman period despite the fact that they left their permanent trade in American as well as Western conceptions of the period such as “Terrible Turk” and “Red Sultan” just to name a few. From the landing of the first two American Protestant missionaries, Levi Parsons and Pliny Fisk, on the Ottoman Empire, as a matter of fact on the Near East, in early 1820, until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, American missionaries occupied the increasing attention of the Ottoman bureaucracy in domestic and foreign affairs while the mission work in the Ottoman Empire established the largest investment of the American Board of Commissionaries for Foreign Missions (A.B.C.F.M.) in the world, even above China and India, on the eve of the war. The bulk of the correspondence of the Ottoman Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the period was with the United States and this was chiefly concerned about the American mission schools. Therefore, this paper seeks to examine the encounter between the Ottoman officialdom and the American Protestant missionaries in Ottoman Turkey during the successive regimes of Sultan Abdülhamid II and the Committee of Union and Progress, the Unionists in the period of 1876-1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Cult in the Decapolis Nysa-Scythopolis As a Test Case
    Chapter 14 Imperial Cult in the Decapolis Nysa-Scythopolis as a Test Case Gabriel Mazor* The imperial cult, an elusive phenomenon, which generated its own cultic per- spectives and political ideology, is a vague and much disputed topic among scholars. It was formerly much more intensively researched in the center of the empire and its satellite regions, for instance in Greece and Asia Minor, than in the relatively remote eastern provinces of Syria Palaestina and Arabia (Taylor 1931; Cerfaux and Tondriau 1957; Herz 1978; Price 1984). Shortly after Actium (30/29 BCE), the koina of Asia and Bithynia requested permission to worship Octavian as their savior (σωτήρ) (Cassius Dio Roman History 51, 20, 6–7; Fishwick 1987–2005, 3:3). They were soon followed by Pergamon and Nicomedia worshiping him with Dea Roma and divus Julius, and Dea Roma in Ephesus and Nicaea (Suetonius, Aug. 52; Tacitus, Ann. 4.37; Fishwick 1987–2005, 1:77, 126–30). In 29 BCE, Octavian dedicated the temple of divus Julius and by the legal power of adoption became divi filius. First in Asia Minor and the East and later in the West, the practice of the ruler cult was rapidly promoted into a central cultic theme. In the East, Herod, king of Judea, was the first (under political circumstances) to devote remarkable and unprecedented efforts in dedicating re-founded cities, a newly constructed harbor, palaces, and impe- rial cult temples and temene in honor of his new patron Augustus (Sebastos) and his ruler cult, along with celebrating festivals and hosting quinquennial games honoring Caesar, all accomplished in less than two decades (30–10 BCE).
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications 1427998433.Pdf
    THE CHURCH OF ARMENIA HISTORIOGRAPHY THEOLOGY ECCLESIOLOGY HISTORY ETHNOGRAPHY By Father Zaven Arzoumanian, PhD Columbia University Publication of the Western Diocese of the Armenian Church 2014 Cover painting by Hakob Gasparian 2 During the Pontificate of HIS HOLINESS KAREKIN II Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians By the Order of His Eminence ARCHBISHOP HOVNAN DERDERIAN Primate of the Western Diocese Of the Armenian Church of North America 3 To The Mgrublians And The Arzoumanians With Gratitude This publication sponsored by funds from family and friends on the occasion of the author’s birthday Special thanks to Yeretsgin Joyce Arzoumanian for her valuable assistance 4 To Archpriest Fr. Dr. Zaven Arzoumanian A merited Armenian clergyman Beloved Der Hayr, Your selfless pastoral service has become a beacon in the life of the Armenian Apostolic Church. Blessed are you for your sacrificial spirit and enduring love that you have so willfully offered for the betterment of the faithful community. You have shared the sacred vision of our Church fathers through your masterful and captivating writings. Your newest book titled “The Church of Armenia” offers the reader a complete historiographical, theological, ecclesiological, historical and ethnographical overview of the Armenian Apostolic Church. We pray to the Almighty God to grant you a long and a healthy life in order that you may continue to enrich the lives of the flock of Christ with renewed zeal and dedication. Prayerfully, Archbishop Hovnan Derderian Primate March 5, 2014 Burbank 5 PREFACE Specialized and diversified studies are included in this book from historiography to theology, and from ecclesiology to ethno- graphy, most of them little known to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • THEATRE of WAR 264–241 Bc 0 200 400 Kilometres 0 100 200 Miles
    a S e i a n h e n T y r r Liparian Lipara Isles Mylae Messana Panormus Tyndaris Cale acte Soloeis Drepanum Eryx Himers Motya Segesta Tauromenium Aegatian Naxos Isles Lilybaeum Entella Mt Etna Agyrium Mazara SICILY Selinus Enna Catane Heraclea Acragas Leontini M e d i t e r r Syracuse a n Gela Phoenician settlements e Ecnomus Acrae a n S Plemmyrium Greek settlements e a Native settlements Camerina 0 25 50 75 kilometres 0 25 50 miles Pachynus THEATRE OF WAR 264–241 BC 0 200 400 kilometres 0 100 200 miles Ticinus ILLY RICUM Ticinum DALMATIA Po Trebia Bononia Fanum Pisa Arno Ariminum Trasimeme Perusia Adriatic Sea CORSICA Cosa Tiber Alba Fucens Veii Rome Allifae Cannae Beneventum SARDINIA Pompeii Brundisium Neapolis Tarentum Tyrrh enian Sea Croton a M Se e n d i Messana ia t Rhegium on e r I r a Lilybaeum n SICILY e a n S Carthage e a Syracuse AFRICA Zama ITALY IN THE WAR WITH HANNIBAL THE EASTERN EMPIRE k S e a B l a c Artaxata Sinope GREA TER ARMENIA Heraclea PONTUS Byzantium BITHY NIA Nicomedia MA CEDONIA SOPHENE GALA TIA Halys C APP ADOCIA LYCAONIA CORDUENE Pergamon ASIA P ARTHIAN KINGDOM Tigris Athens Ephesus OSROHENE Antioch Euphrates ACH AEA CILICIA LY CIA SY RIA Seleucia RHODES CYPRUS CRETE Roman Empire M e d i t e Roman Provinces r r a n e a n S e a PALESTINE Cyrene Jerusalem Roman Protectorates Parthian Kingdom CY RENAICA Alexandria 0 200 400 kilometres EGYPT 0 100 200 miles Nile THE ROMAN EMPIRE UNDER HADRIAN n a e c O c i t n a a e l North S t Sea ic A lt York Ba BRIT AIN London Aral Sea Colonia Agrippina Rhine Mainz Danube GAUL
    [Show full text]
  • A REASSESSMENT of GALLIENUS' REIGN TROY KENDRICK Bachelor
    A REASSESSMENT OF GALLIENUS’ REIGN TROY KENDRICK Bachelor of Arts, University of Lethbridge, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS History Department University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Troy Kendrick, 2014 Abstract This thesis examines and reassesses the reign of the Roman emperor Gallienus in the mid-third century CE. Specifically, this paper analyses Gallienus’ military and administrative policies, his conception of his emperorship, and the influence his policies had on his successors.Gallienus ruled over the Roman Empire during a period of unprecedented calamities. The misfortunes of the Roman Empire during this period, and the biases against Gallienus in the writings of the ancient Latin authors, left a less-than-favorable impression of Gallienus’ reign. However, a re-evaluation of Gallienus and his policies unveils a remarkably capable emperor, who should be credited with not only saving the Roman Empire from complete collapse, but laying the foundation for the Empire’s recovery in the late third century CE. iii Acknowledgements I would like offer my thanks to committee members David Hay and Kevin McGeough for their assistance and comments regarding my thesis. I would especially like to thank my supervisor, Christopher Epplett, for the invaluable assistance, encouragement, and patience he has extended to me throughout the entire writing process. Finally, I would like to thank my family for
    [Show full text]
  • The Experiences and Education of the Emperor Julian and How It
    COMPANION TO THE GODS, FRIEND TO THE EMPIRE: THE EXPERIENCES AND EDUCATION OF THE EMPEROR JULIAN AND HOW IT INFLUE NCED HIS REIGN Marshall Lilly Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2014 APPROVED: Christopher Fuhrmann, Major Professor Laura Stern, Committee Member Robert Citino, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Lilly, Marshall. Companion to the Gods, Friend to the Empire: The Experiences and Education of the Emperor Julian and How It Influenced His Reign 361-363 A.D. Master of Arts (History), August 2014, 108 pp., bibliography, 114 titles. This thesis explores the life and reign of Julian the Apostate the man who ruled over the Roman Empire from A.D. 361-363. The study of Julian the Apostate’s reign has historically been eclipsed due to his clash with Christianity. After the murder of his family in 337 by his Christian cousin Constantius, Julian was sent into exile. These emotional experiences would impact his view of the Christian religion for the remainder of his life. Julian did have conflict with the Christians but his main goal in the end was the revival of ancient paganism and the restoration of the Empire back to her glory. The purpose of this study is to trace the education and experiences that Julian had undergone and the effects they it had on his reign. Julian was able to have both a Christian and pagan education that would have a lifelong influence on his reign.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 86 Paphlagonia Compiled by C
    Map 86 Paphlagonia Compiled by C. Foss, 1995 Introduction The map comprises ancient Paphlagonia, and extends into eastern Bithynia and the northernmost part of Galatia. Evidence for the ancient topography is most abundant on the coast, along the Roman roads, and in Galatia. Arrian’s Periplus Ponti Euxini (written c. A.D. 132), together with an earlier text by Menippus (c. 20 B.C.) and a related Late Antique anonymous work, describe the coast in great detail. Most of the sites named in these works can be located at least approximately, although a few resist identification; Müller’s commentary in GGM I remains valuable. For the Roman roads, ItMiller is uncritical; French (1981) is far more useful, but treats only one major road. The roads of Paphlagonia are presented in admirable detail by TIB Paphlagonien, those of northern Galatia likewise by TIB Galatien. The interior of Paphlagonia is a remote, mountainous country, cut off from the regions to the south by long, parallel ranges. Communication east and west is relatively easy; north and south, it is much more difficult. The country contains a few long, wide plains and river valleys, some of considerable fertility. In antiquity, the mountains were heavily forested. For the most part, the region was never densely populated. For a general description, see Leonhard (1915); and for an excellent account of some areas (including eastern Bithynia), with discussion of specific problems, note Robert (1980). RE Paphlagonia gives a full list of all named sites (cols. 2537-50) and of physical remains (2498-2510, 2515). Some features listed there do not appear on the map because of limited significance or uncertainty of dating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Sea Area in the Trade System of the Roman Empire
    The Black Sea Area in the Trade System of the Roman Empire by Octavian Bounegru, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi Abstract This paper analyses, with epigraphic and archaeological references, the features of trade and ship- ping on the western coast of the Black Sea during the ancient period. It starts with the political and military context of Rome’s involvement in the area since the late second century BC, before dealing with the Mithridatic crisis, when the focus of Roman policy moved to the Aegean and the Black Sea. This tense political constellation triggered the development of regional trade, analysed on the basis of relevant sources, with a special attention devoted to Tomis, the largest outlet in the area of the mouths of the Danube. The author contends that excellent relations existed with the commercial centres of Asia Minor, more precisely Bithynia. A veritable maritime line from Nicomedia to Tomis acted as a major route between Asia Minor and the Black Sea – Danubian region. During the Roman age, the commercial and transport patterns established from Hellenistic times were preserved, and they continued to co-exist with those specific to the Roman world. he Black Sea area is rarely (if ever) men- that the western district of the Black Sea repre- Ttioned in scientific papers devoted to the sents an interesting case study. ancient economy. Even in a recent book con- In terms of economic history, the Black cerning the Roman economic system1 the con- Sea should be analysed as a complex organ- tribution of the Black Sea in the ensemble of ism functioning in close connection with its the Empire’s trade relations is practically ne- adjacent areas.
    [Show full text]
  • OLBA VIII (Özel Say›)
    ISSN 1301-7667 m MERS‹N ÜN‹VERS‹TES‹ KILIKIA ARKEOLOJ‹S‹N‹ ARAfiTIRMA MERKEZ‹ MERSIN UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH CENTER OF CILICIAN ARCHAEOLOGY KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA VIII (Özel Say›) MERS‹N 2003 KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA VIII (Özel Say›) © 2003 Mersin/Türkiye ISSN 1301-7667 OLBA dergisi hakemlidir ve May›s-Haziran aylar›nda olmak üzere, y›lda iki kez bas›lmaktad›r. Published each year in May and June. KAAM’›n izni olmadan OLBA’n›n hiçbir bölümü kopya edilemez. Al›nt› yap›lmas› durumunda dipnot ile referans gösterilmelidir. It is not allowed to copy any section of OLBA without the permit of KAAM. OLBA’ya gönderilen makaleler afla¤›daki web adresinde yada KAAM taraf›ndan da¤›t›lan broflürlerde bildirilmifl olan formatlara uygun oldu¤u taktirde bas›lacakt›r. Articles should be written according the formats mentioned in the following web address or brochures distributed by KAAM Yay›nlanmas› istenilen makalelerin, her y›l›n sonuna kadar afla¤›da belirtilen iletiflim adreslerine teslim edilmifl olmas› gerekmektedir. Articles should be sent to the following correspondence addresses till the end of the year. OLBA’n›n yeni say›lar›nda yay›nlanmas› istenen makaleler için yaz›flma adresi: Correspondance addresses for sending articles to following volumes of OLBA: Prof. Dr. Serra Durugönül Mersin Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü Çiftlikköy Kampüsü 33342-MERS‹N TURKEY Di¤er ‹letiflim Adresleri Other Correspondance Addresses Tel:00.90.324.361 00 01 (10 Lines)/162-163 Fax: 00.90.324.361 00 46 web mail: www.kaam.mersin.edu.tr e-mail: [email protected] m MERS‹N ÜN‹VERS‹TES‹ KILIKIA ARKEOLOJ‹S‹N‹ ARAfiTIRMA MERKEZ‹ (KAAM) YAYINLARI-VIII MERSIN UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH CENTER OF CILICIAN ARCHAEOLOGY (KAAM)-VIII (Özel Say›) Editör Serra DURUGÖNÜL Murat DURUKAN Bilim Kurulu Prof.
    [Show full text]