Tibetan Buddhist Analytical Meditation and Monastic Debate: a Psychological Analysis of a Reasoning-Based Meditation Practice
Tibetan Buddhist analytical meditation and monastic debate: a psychological analysis of a reasoning-based meditation practice Authors: Marieke K. van Vugt, Institute of Artificial Intelligence & Cognitive Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Amir Moye, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Joshua Pollock, Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent OH, USA Bryce Johnson, Science for Monks. Marcel O. Bonn-Miller, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Devon, PA. Kalden Gyatso, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Jampa Thakchoe, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Thokney Adentsang, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Ngawang Norbu, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Lobsang Tenzin, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Thabkhe Lodroe, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Jampa Lobsang, Sera Jey Monastic University, Bylakuppe, India. Thupten Gyaltsen, Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, Dharamsala, India. David M. Fresco, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent OH, USA Abstract Analytical meditation and monastic debate are contemplative practices engaged in by Tibetan Buddhist monastics that have up to now been largely unexplored in Western contemplative science. The highly physical form of contemplative debating plays an important role in the monastic curriculum. Based on intensive discussions
[Show full text]