William the Conqueror

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William the Conqueror William the Conqueror William I (Old Norman: Williame I; c. 1028[1] continental domains, troubles with his eldest son, and – 9 September 1087), usually known as William threatened invasions of England by the Danes. In 1086 the Conqueror and sometimes William the Bas- William ordered the compilation of the Domesday Book, tard,[2][lower-alpha 1] was the first Norman King of Eng- a survey listing all the landholders in England along with land, reigning from 1066 until his death in 1087. The their holdings. William died in September 1087 while descendant of Viking raiders, he had been Duke of Nor- leading a campaign in northern France, and was buried in mandy since 1035 under the style William II. After a Caen. His reign in England was marked by the construc- long struggle to establish his power, by 1060 his hold on tion of castles, the settling of a new Norman nobility on Normandy was secure, and he launched the Norman con- the land, and change in the composition of the English quest of England in 1066. The rest of his life was marked clergy. He did not try to integrate his various domains by struggles to consolidate his hold over England and his into one empire, but instead continued to administer each continental lands and by difficulties with his eldest son. part separately. William’s lands were divided after his William was the son of the unmarried Robert I, Duke of death: Normandy went to his eldest son, Robert, and his Normandy, by Robert’s mistress Herleva. His illegitimate second surviving son, William, received England. status and his youth caused some difficulties for him after he succeeded his father, as did the anarchy that plagued the first years of his rule. During his childhood and 1 Background adolescence, members of the Norman aristocracy battled each other, both for control of the child duke and for their Norsemen first began raiding in what became Normandy own ends. In 1047 William was able to quash a rebel- in the late 8th century. Permanent Scandinavian settle- lion and begin to establish his authority over the duchy, ment occurred before 911, when Rollo, one of the Viking a process that was not complete until about 1060. His leaders, and King Charles the Simple of France reached marriage in the 1050s to Matilda of Flanders provided an agreement surrendering the county of Rouen to Rollo. him with a powerful ally in the neighbouring county of The lands around Rouen became the core of the later Flanders. By the time of his marriage, William was able duchy of Normandy.[3] Normandy may have been used to arrange the appointments of his supporters as bishops as a base when Scandinavian attacks on England were re- and abbots in the Norman church. His consolidation of newed at the end of the 10th century, which would have power allowed him to expand his horizons, and by 1062 worsened relations between England and Normandy.[4] In William was able to secure control of the neighbouring an effort to improve matters, King Æthelred the Unready county of Maine. took Emma of Normandy, sister of Duke Richard II, as In the 1050s and early 1060s William became a con- his second wife in 1002.[5] tender for the throne of England, then held by the child- Danish raids on England continued, and Æthelred sought less Edward the Confessor, his first cousin once removed. help from Richard, taking refuge in Normandy in 1013 There were other potential claimants, including the pow- when King Swein I of Denmark drove Æthelred and his erful English earl Harold Godwinson, who was named family from England. Swein’s death in 1014 allowed the next king by Edward on the latter’s deathbed in Jan- Æthelred to return home, but Swein’s son Cnut contested uary 1066. William argued that Edward had previously Æthelred’s return. Æthelred died unexpectedly in 1016, promised the throne to him, and that Harold had sworn to and Cnut became king of England. Æthelred and Emma’s support William’s claim. William built a large fleet and two sons, Edward and Alfred, went into exile in Nor- invaded England in September 1066, decisively defeating mandy while their mother, Emma, became Cnut’s second and killing Harold at the Battle of Hastings on 14 October wife.[6] 1066. After further military efforts William was crowned king on Christmas Day 1066, in London. He made ar- After Cnut’s death in 1035 the English throne fell rangements for the governance of England in early 1067 to Harold Harefoot, his son by his first wife, while before returning to Normandy. Several unsuccessful re- Harthacnut, his son by Emma, became king in Den- bellions followed, but by 1075 William’s hold on England mark. England remained unstable. Alfred returned to was mostly secure, allowing him to spend the majority of England in 1036 to visit his mother and perhaps to chal- the rest of his reign on the continent. lenge Harold as king. One story implicates Earl Godwin of Wessex in Alfred’s subsequent death, but others blame William’s final years were marked by difficulties in his Harold. Emma went into exile in Flanders until Harthac- 1 2 3 DUKE OF NORMANDY nut became king following Harold’s death in 1040, and France.[2] his half-brother Edward followed Harthacnut to England; There are indications that Robert may have been briefly Edward was proclaimed king after Harthacnut’s death in [7][lower-alpha 2] betrothed to a daughter of King Cnut, but no marriage June 1042. took place. It is unclear if William would have been sup- planted in the ducal succession if Robert had had a le- gitimate son. Earlier dukes had been illegitimate, and 2 Early life William’s association with his father on ducal charters appears to indicate that William was considered Robert’s most likely heir.[2] In 1034 Duke Robert decided to go on pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Although some of his support- ers tried to dissuade him from undertaking the journey, Robert convened a council in January 1035 and had the assembled Norman magnates swear fealty to William as his heir[2][15] before leaving for Jerusalem. He died in early July at Nicea, on his way back to Normandy.[15] 3 Duke of Normandy 3.1 Challenges William I ~ Sprota = Esperleng Ermengarde = Conan of of Anjou Brttany Fulk III Château de Falaise in Falaise, Lower Normandy, France; ~ Rodulf of Anjou Richard I = Gunnora Seinfreda Herfast of Ivry William was born in an earlier building here. Duvelina of Crepon Judith of = Richard II = Papia of Archbishop Geoffrey Geoffrey I Hawise= Joscelina of Brittany Rennes Envermeu Robert of Eu Fulbert of of Rouen Humphrey Osbern = Emma Geoffrey Falaise +++++++ the Steward de Vielles ++++++++ Martel Alan III of ---------- Richard III Gilbert of William was born in 1027 or 1028 at Falaise, Normandy, Brittany Roger de +++++++ Alice= Renaud I of Brionne Montgomery Burgundy ++++++ [1][8][lower-alpha 3] Walter Herleva ~ Robert I Roger de William Archbishop most likely towards the end of 1028. He of Falaise William Beaumont Fitz Osbern +++++++ Mauger +++++++ ++++++++ Guy of of Talou William the ++++++ of Rouen Roger de Burgundy ---------- +++++++ was the only son of Robert I, Duke of Normandy, son of Conqueror ------------ ------------ Montgomery ++++++++++ Duke Richard II.[lower-alpha 4] His mother, Herleva, was the daughter of Fulbert of Falaise; Fulbert may have been a Diagram showing William’s family relationships. Names with [9] tanner or embalmer. She was possibly a member of the "---" under them were opponents of William, and names with ducal household, but did not marry Robert.[2] Instead, she "+++" were supporters of William. Some relatives switched sides later married Herluin de Conteville, with whom she had over time, and are marked with both symbols. two sons – Odo of Bayeux and Robert, Count of Mortain – and a daughter whose name is unknown.[lower-alpha 5] One William faced several challenges on becoming duke, in- of Herleva’s brothers, Walter, became a supporter and cluding his illegitimate birth and his youth: the evidence protector of William during his minority.[9][lower-alpha 6] indicates that he was either seven or eight years old at Robert also had a daughter, Adelaide of Normandy, by the time.[16][17][lower-alpha 7] He enjoyed the support of his another mistress.[12] great-uncle, Archbishop Robert, as well as the king of France, Henry I, enabling him to succeed to his father’s Robert became Duke of Normandy on 6 August 1027, [20] succeeding his elder brother Richard III, who had only duchy. The support given to the exiled English princes succeeded to the title the previous year.[1] Robert and in their attempt to return to England in 1036 shows that the new duke’s guardians were attempting to continue his brother had been at odds over the succession, and [2] Richard’s death was sudden. Robert was accused by some his father’s policies, but Archbishop Robert’s death in writers of killing his brother, a plausible but now unprov- March 1037 removed one of William’s main support- [13] ers, and conditions in Normandy quickly descended into able charge. Conditions in Normandy were unsettled, [20] as noble families despoiled the Church and Alan III of chaos. Brittany waged war against the duchy, possibly in an at- The anarchy in the duchy lasted until 1047,[21] and con- tempt to take control. By 1031 Robert had gathered con- trol of the young duke was one of the priorities of those siderable support from noblemen, many of whom would contending for power.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Origins of Lordship
    THE ANCIENT ORIGINS OF THE LORDSHIP OF BOWLAND Speculation on Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Norse and Brythonic roots William Bowland The standard history of the lordship of Bowland begins with Domesday. Roger de Poitou, younger son of one of William the Conqueror’s closest associates, Roger de Montgomery, Earl of Shrewsbury, is recorded in 1086 as tenant-in-chief of the thirteen manors of Bowland: Gretlintone (Grindleton, then caput manor), Slatebourne (Slaidburn), Neutone (Newton), Bradeforde (West Bradford), Widitun (Waddington), Radun (Radholme), Bogeuurde (Barge Ford), Mitune (Great Mitton), Esingtune (Lower Easington), Sotelie (Sawley?), Hamereton (Hammerton), Badresbi (Battersby/Dunnow), Baschelf (Bashall Eaves). William Rufus It was from these holdings that the Forest and Liberty of Bowland emerged sometime after 1087. Further lands were granted to Poitou by William Rufus, either to reward him for his role in defeating the army of Scots king Malcolm III in 1091-2 or possibly as a consequence of the confiscation of lands from Robert de Mowbray, Earl of Northumbria in 1095. 1 As a result, by the first decade of the twelfth century, the Forest and Liberty of Bowland, along with the adjacent fee of Blackburnshire and holdings in Hornby and Amounderness, had been brought together to form the basis of what became known as the Honor of Clitheroe. Over the next two centuries, the lordship of Bowland followed the same descent as the Honor, ultimately reverting to the Crown in 1399. This account is one familiar to students of Bowland history. However, research into the pattern of land holdings prior to the Norman Conquest is now beginning to uncover origins for the lordship that predate Poitou’s lordship by many centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Ancestors of the Chicago Rodger's
    Selected Ancestors of the Chicago Rodger’s Volume I: Continental Ancestors Before Hastings David Anderson March 2016 Charlemagne’s Europe – 800 AD For additional information, please contact David Anderson at: [email protected] 508 409 8597 Stained glass window depicting Charles Martel at Strasbourg Cathedral. Pepin shown standing Pepin le Bref Baldwin II, Margrave of Flanders 2 Continental Ancestors Before Hastings Saints, nuns, bishops, brewers, dukes and even kings among them David Anderson March 12, 2016 Abstract Early on, our motivation for studying the ancestors of the Chicago Rodger’s was to determine if, according to rumor, they are descendants of any of the Scottish Earls of Bothwell. We relied mostly on two resources on the Internet: Ancestry.com and Scotlandspeople.gov.uk. We have been subscribers of both. Finding the ancestral lines connecting the Chicago Rodger’s to one or more of the Scottish Earls of Bothwell was the most time consuming and difficult undertaking in generating the results shown in a later book of this series of three books. It shouldn’t be very surprising that once we found Earls in Scotland we would also find Kings and Queens, which we did. The ancestral line that connects to the Earls of Bothwell goes through Helen Heath (1831-1902) who was the mother and/or grandmother of the Chicago Rodger’s She was the paternal grandmother of my grandfather, Alfred Heath Rodger. Within this Heath ancestral tree we found four lines of ancestry without any evident errors or ambiguities. Three of those four lines reach just one Earl of Bothwell, the 1st, and the fourth line reaches the 1st, 2nd and 3rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Thevikingblitzkriegad789-1098.Pdf
    2 In memory of Jeffrey Martin Whittock (1927–2013), much-loved and respected father and papa. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of people provided valuable advice which assisted in the preparation of this book; without them, of course, carrying any responsibility for the interpretations offered by the book. We are particularly indebted to our agent Robert Dudley who, as always, offered guidance and support, as did Simon Hamlet and Mark Beynon at The History Press. In addition, Bradford-on-Avon library, and the Wiltshire and the Somerset Library services, provided access to resources through the inter-library loans service. For their help and for this service we are very grateful. Through Hannah’s undergraduate BA studies and then MPhil studies in the department of Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic (ASNC) at Cambridge University (2008–12), the invaluable input of many brilliant academics has shaped our understanding of this exciting and complex period of history, and its challenging sources of evidence. The resulting familiarity with Old English, Old Norse and Insular Latin has greatly assisted in critical reflection on the written sources. As always, the support and interest provided by close family and friends cannot be measured but is much appreciated. And they have been patient as meal-time conversations have given way to discussions of the achievements of Alfred and Athelstan, the impact of Eric Bloodaxe and the agendas of the compilers of the 4 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. 5 CONTENTS Title Dedication Acknowledgements Introduction 1 The Gathering
    [Show full text]
  • English Alliterative Verse: Poetic Tradition and Literary History
    ENGLISH ALLITERATIVE VERSE English Alliterative Verse tells the story of the medieval poetic tradition that includes Beowulf, Piers Plowman, and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, stretching from the eighth century, when English poetry first appeared in manuscripts, to the sixteenth century, when alliterative poetry ceased to be composed. Eric Weiskott draws on the study of meter to challenge the traditional division of medieval English literary history into ‘Old English’ and ‘Middle English’ periods. The two halves of the alliterative tradition, divided by the Norman Conquest of 1066, have been studied separately since the nineteenth century; this book uses the history of metrical form and its cultural meanings to bring the two halves back together. In combining literary history and metrical description into a new kind of history he calls ‘verse history,’ Weiskott reimagines the historical study of poetics. eric weiskott is Assistant Professor of English at Boston College. In addition to publishing widely on alliterative verse and early English literary history in journals such as Anglo-Saxon England, ELH, Modern Language Quarterly, Modern Philology, Review of English Studies, and Yearbook of Langland Studies, Weiskott is also a practicing poet. Most recently, his poems have appeared in burnt- district, Cricket Online Review, and paper nautilus. His first poetry chapbook was Sharp Fish (2008). With Irina Dumitrescu, he has co- edited a volume of essays with the working title Early English Poetics and the History of Style. cambridge studies
    [Show full text]
  • The French Language and the Common Law 341
    The French language and the common law 341 The French language and the common law Ronald Cantlie" THIS ESSAY HAS BEEN PROMPTED by a brief anonymous article in the Manitoba Bar Newsletter Headnotes and Footnotes for October, 1987,1 en- titled "Le Français et la `Cornmon Law' and in particular by two pas- sages therein.2 The first of these passages consists of a single sentence as follows: la 'common law', c'est en effet le système de droit uniforme que Guillaume le Con- quérant, premier roi francophone d'Angleterre instaura dans ce pays au Xle siècle. 1989 CanLIIDocs 164 The second passage reads: Malgré cette interdiction, un auteur britannique pouvait encore ecrire ce qui suit au XIXe siècle: [TRADUCTION] Il n'est guère possible de parler convenablement de droit en anglais et, lorsque l'on tente l'experience, il faut, pour éviter d'être trop maladroit, avoir recours à une langue fortement francisée... Bref, du point de vue historique, la véritable langue du droit anglais, c'est le français! The statements made in the second of these quotations are entirely correct. But the first quotation is equally entirely wrong. William I did not impose a uniform system of law on England. He systematized land tenure, with the result that in time England became the best organized feudal state in Europe, but that is essentially all he did. The statements made in the first quotation are based on a misunderstanding of the na- ture and immediate consequences of the historical event commonly, but somewhat inaccurately, referred to as the Norman Conquest.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Consolidation of Power Level
    Key Words, Week 1: Key Individuals, Week 2: History, Y9 T1b: Norman Consolidation of Power Revolt A rebellion against the ruler of a country William the Norman king of England, ruled from 1066 (those rebelling are known as rebels). Conqueror to 1087. Level: Grade 5 (compulsory) Regent A trusted advisor to the king that was allowed Edwin and Morcar Anglo-Saxon earls of Mercia and to run the country while he was absent. Northumbria. Submitted in 1066, but later Key dates, Week 3: th Motte and A castle which was easy to build, used by the rebelled multiple times. 25 Dec William crowned king at Westminster bailey Normans to control England soon after the Edgar Atheling An Anglo-Saxon claimant to the throne. 1066 Abbey. Conquest. Allied with the Scots and the Danes to Aug A major rebellion in the north, led by Landholder The person that lives on the land, effectively fight William. 1068 Edwin and Morcar. renting it from the king. Robert de A Norman earl, given the job of subduing Jan 1069 Robert de Comines was burned to death Landowner The person who actually owns the land. After Comines Northumbria. Burned to death by rebels. by rebels in Durham. 1066, the king was the only landowner in Hereward the An Anglo-Saxon thegn and rebel who took Sept The Danes invaded and supported the England. Wake Ely. 1069 Anglo-Saxon rebellion, led by Edgar. Tenure The process by which you held land from the William fitzOsbern Loyal followers of William and his regents Oct 1069 William paid off the Danes and defeated king.
    [Show full text]
  • War for the English Throne Houston Area Model United Nations
    Houston Area Model United Nations Crisis Committee War for the English Throne The Kingdom of England Triple Joint Crisis Committee Houston Area Model United Nations 46 January 21-22, 2021 Hello Delegates, Welcome to the 46th Houston Area Model United Nations Conference! The war for the English Throne, which took place in 1066 was the cumulation of conflicts, which occurred after the Vikings came into contact with continental Europe and England. Here each one of will have a chance to participate in events that took place just before the swords were crossed. The three main participants will be the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of England, and The Duchy of Normandy, along with some of their respective allies. The Kingdom of Norway is Directed by, Omama Ahmed, who is a current freshman at Lonestar college with plans to transfer to New York university. She is intending to study public health and has been a delegate in her high school Model UN in the past three years. She has always loved the program and was thrilled when given the opportunity to be a part of the crisis committees. She’s very excited to be working with two great Crisis directors for her first year and cannot wait to see how the conference goes. The Duchy of Normandy is directed by, Joel Varghese who is a sophomore currently attending Texas A&M University at College Station, studying Industrial Engineering. He has been a part of Model UN, since his sophomore year at high school and he plans on pursuing this passion until he graduates college.
    [Show full text]
  • History Lower
    History KNOWLEDGE ORGANISER Paper2: Anglo-Saxons and Normans L What’s in my knowledge Organiser? 1. Unit Sheets / Checklists This will help you know what is required at each stage of your learning. 2. Powerful Knowledge The key information you need to recall 3. Practice Pages Use the knowledge from section 2 to practise exam questions here. 4. Revision Tools Tasks to help you embed your knowledge. 1. Unit Sheets / Checklists This will help you know what is required at each stage of your learning. Confidence Levels KNOWLEDGE CHECKLIST Key Topic 1: Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-66 ANGLO-SAXON SOCIETY Monarchy and government (Power and role of the King and the Witan) Earldoms, local government and the legal system. The economy The social structure (Pyramid of power and the roles within it) Features of towns and villages The role and power of the Church EDWARD THE CONFESSOR AND THE SUCCESSION CRISIS The Godwin family (Power, position and Harold) Harold Godwinson’s visit to Normandy and promise to William The Northumbrian uprising against Tostig and his exile. The death of Edward the Confessor and reasons this caused a succession crisis. THE RIVAL CLAIMANTS FOR THE THRONE The motives and claims of William of Normandy, Harald Hardrada, Harold Godwinson and Edgar the Aetheling. The coronation and reign of Harold Godwinson in 1066. The reasons for and significance of the outcome of the battles of Gate Fulford and Stamford Bridge. THE NORMAN INVASION The Battle of Hastings Reasons for William’s victory. (Leadership skills of Harold and William, Norman and English troops and tactics) Key Topic 2: William I in power: securing the kingdom, 1066-87 ESTABLISHING CONTROL The submission of the earls to William in 1066 and his coronation.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Organiser Focus: the Norman Conquest
    Knowledge Organiser Focus: The Norman Conquest I should already know: Key Words How to plot and use a Cavalry Mounted soldiers on horseback timeline in chronological Claimant Someone believing they should be king order. Feigned Retreat Pretending to run away so that enemy is tricked into following Feudal System Hierarchy of society, with the King at the top I will learn: Fyrd Anglo-Saxon soldiers who joined the army at times of trouble. They • What life was like pre- were usually farmers and were poorly trained. 1066. • Why there was a Housecarls Full-time, well-trained Anglo-Saxon warriors succession crisis in 1066. Oath A very serious promise • The 3 main contenders for Shield Wall Overlapping shields in battle for protection the throne: Harold Godwinson, Harald Hardrada, William of Greater Depth Challenge Normandy How important was Tostig? • The events of the 3 main Tostig Godwinson: brother of battles: Gate Fulford, Harold Godwinson and Earl of Stamford Bridge, Hastings. Northumbria. He lost his • The effects of the Norman Earldom because of his Conquest including the tyrannical rule and joined Harrying of the North Edward the Confessor died in Hardrada. 1066 with no heirs, This will help in the future: leaving a disputed Further Reading succession and 3 Fact: https://www.bbc.com/bitesize Crime and Punishment through main claimants for /guides/zsjnb9q/revision/1 time the throne. This led Anglo-Saxon & Norman Britain to 3 battles taking Fiction: 1066 (I was there) by Jim place that year. Eldridge Knowledge Organiser Focus: The Norman Conquest Summarise your learning Chronology: what happened on these dates? 1043 Edward the Confessor crowned King of England Anglo- Anglo-Saxons England was Saxon a largely peaceful and 1064 Harold’s embassy to Normandy society prosperous kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norman Conquest Prepre -- 10661066 Y 912 ◦ Scandinavian Northmen Gained the Right to Occupy the Normandy
    TheThe NormanNorman ConquestConquest The Anglo Saxon Chronicle Jan Seidensticker & Philipp Preker 1. The Anglo Saxon Chronicle 1. Pre -1066 2. A.D. 1066 3. A.D. 1070 2. Facts about William I of England 3. Appearance of the French language in England 4. Linguistic impact of the Norman Conquest PrePre -- 10661066 y 912 ◦ Scandinavian Northmen gained the right to occupy the Normandy. ◦ Rollo their leader accepted the French King as his overlord and became the first Duke of Normandy. y 1002 ◦ Æthered the Unready King of England was driven into exile by the Danes and fled to Normandy. ◦ His son Edward was born in France and thus received a French education. y 1042 ◦ When the Danish lined died out, Edward was restored to the English throne. A.D.A.D. 10661066 y King Edward died on the “eve of Twelth day” (6th of Jan.) childless. y The same day King Harold was crowned the new king; he was the son of Godwin Earl of Wessex and had been the principal advisor of Edward. y Harold sent a fleet against William, Duke of Normandy. (William had plans to invade England to claim his right to the English Throne) WhoWho wantedwanted toto claimclaim thethe EnglishEnglish thronethrone BayeuxBayeux TapestryTapestry HaroldHarold thethe newnew kingking A.D.A.D. 10661066 Meanwhile Earl Tosty or Tostig (Brother of Harold), who had previously been banished from the land, invaded Harold’s kingdom. He sailed into the Humber with 60 ships, but was defeated by Edwin Earl of Mercia. A.D.A.D. 10661066 y Tosty fled to Scotland and allied himself with Harald [Hadrada], King of Norway, who also claimed the English throne.
    [Show full text]
  • (1997) 13- 56 1 Domesday Book and the Malets: Patrimony And
    © K.S.B.Keats-Rohan 1996 Printed Nottingham Medieval Studies 41 (1997) 13- 56 Domesday Book and the Malets: patrimony and the private histories of public lives Established on ducal demesne lands at Graville-Sainte-Honorine in the Pays de Caux by the beginning of the eleventh century, the 'grand lignage' of Malet is one of the most inadequately discussed of all the great Norman houses to enjoy large landholdings in England after 1066. An account of the formation of their Norman honour, much of which was held not directly of the duke but of the Giffard family, has been given in recent years by J. Le Maho.1 They also held land near the ducal centre at Caen,2 a connexion that frequently recurs in consideration of their family and tenurial relationships. These are matters fundamental to a study of Malet, but also essential to an understanding of the family's career in the eleventh century is the examination of its association with England. The Malets were the only Norman family of any significance to have had associations with both Normandy and England throughout the century, something that both entitles them to a special status as the 'Anglo-Norman' family par excellence and merits a fresh study. The present study takes as its focal point the career of the Domesday landholder Robert I Malet. The most serious difficulty concerns the period 1087-1100. During this time his Honour of Eye is known to have been held by a powerful favourite of William Rufus, Roger the Poitevin, while he himself apparently completely disappeared from all English and Norman documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 'In Me Porto Crucem': a New Light on the Lost St Margaret's Crux Nigra
    © The Author(s) 2020. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ‘In me porto crucem’: a new light on the lost St Margaret’s crux nigra Francesco Marzella Abstract St Margaret of Scotland owned a reliquary containing a relic of the True Cross known as crux nigra. Both Turgot, Margaret’s biographer, and Aelred of Rievaulx, who spent some years at the court of Margaret’s son, King David, mention the reliquary without offering sufficient information on its origin. The Black Rood was probably lost or destroyed in the sixteenth century. Some lines written on the margins of a twelfth- century manuscript containing Aelred’s Genealogia regum Anglorum can now shed a new light on this sacred object. The mysterious lines, originally written on the Black Rood or more probably on the casket in which it was contained, claim that the relic once belonged to an Anglo-Saxon king, and at the same time they seem to convey a signifi- cant political message. In his biography of St Margaret of Scotland,1 Turgot († 1115),2 at the time prior of Durham, mentioned an object that was particularly dear to the queen. It was a cross known as crux nigra. In chapter XIII of his Vita sanctae Margaretae, Turgot tells how the queen wanted to see it for the last time when she felt death was imminent: 3 Ipsa quoque illam, quam Nigram Crucem nominare, quamque in maxima semper ven- eratione habere consuevit, sibi afferri præcepit.
    [Show full text]