Social Impact Overview of Hobart Airspace Changes (September 2017/March 2018) Consultation Summary Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Social Impact Social Impact Overview of Hobart Airspace Changes (September 2017/March 2018) Consultation Summary Report Prepared for Airservices Australia August 2018 denny street latham act 2615 51 ׀ [email protected] address ׀ email 166 491 0419 ׀ mobile 819 925 900 41 ׀ taniaparkes abn@ ׀ www.taniaparkes.com.au twitter ׀ web Disclaimer This report has been prepared with due care by the consultants, who believe the contents to be fair and accurate. However, neither Tania Parkes Consulting nor individual authors of the Report accept any responsibility for any error or omission, nor for any application of its contents. Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .................................................................................... 2 2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 Key Themes................................................................................................. 6 4.0 Key Considerations ..................................................................................... 9 5.0 Consultation Methods ............................................................................ 14 Attachment 1: Feedback and Stories .................................................................. 18 Attachment 2: Demographic information .......................................................... 53 Attachment 3: Information Sheet ....................................................................... 70 CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT HOBART AIRSPACE CHANGES (SEPTEMBER 2017/MARCH 2018) 1.0 Executive Summary Airservices Australia’s (Airservices) primary obligation is to ensure that aircraft and passengers are able to travel safely. In doing this, Airservices considers factors around social and economic impacts and other cultural and environmental factors. This report is an overview of social impacts The following community feedback from the undertaken to better understand the effects of social impact consultations is provided for flight path changes on individuals and their Airservices to consider in its flight path review: communities. 1. For many community members, the negative The report was compiled from consultation impact of the flight path changes has had a sampling of areas affected by the September compounding affect due to the devastating 2107 and March 2018 Hobart flight path changes, bushfires in 2008. analysed together with desktop research. 2. Most community members would like This report is not a full social impact assessment. Airservices to consider a flight path that extends over water (i.e. along the east coast A recurring narrative in the community feedback and up the Derwent River). was that people and communities matter, and that particular consideration should be given to 3. Should a flight path over water not be the important connection between individuals feasible, some community members would and their communities. A community was like Airservices to explore options for either a described as encompassing the proximate smaller wider corridor or multiple flight paths. This coastal and county villages and towns, not just will ‘share’ the number of aircraft flying over the immediate locality. communities and properties. The most notable aspect of the conversations was 4. Most community members would like a call for Airservices to consider the devastating Airservices to consider the proximity of flight impact of the 2013 bushfires on individuals, their paths to the World Heritage listed Coal Mine families, their businesses and communities; and Historic Site. the long and slow process of recovery for some, if 5. Many community members perceive that not most of the affected people. The noise from aircraft noise reverberates around hills, aircraft flown overhead, which had not previously valleys and bays; and that low ambient noise existed, is said to compound the impact on increases the awareness of noise exposure. individuals and communities and has generated a collective reaction. 6. Some community members would like Airservices to monitor the use of designated flight paths by airlines and pilots. 2 CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT HOBART AIRSPACE CHANGES (SEPTEMBER 2017/MARCH 2018) 7. Most community members would like example, to facilitate informed dialogue, Airservices to be more informative, some community members would like access transparent and approachable in their to the initial findings of the Hobart Airspace communications with the public. For Design Review ahead of the consultations. 3 CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT HOBART AIRSPACE CHANGES (SEPTEMBER 2017/MARCH 2018) 2.0 Introduction Airservices implemented standardised flight path routes in September 2017 for aircraft arriving and departing Hobart. A modification to the new routes was introduced in March 2018. The new flight paths are associated with Review are available on the Airservices satellite-based navigation systems aimed at website improving the safety of aircraft landing and (http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/wp- departures. The use of the satellite navigation content/uploads/Hobart-Airport-SID-and- systems is occurring across Australia as STAR-review-TOR_Final.pdf). required by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority The Hobart Airspace Design Review will be (CASA). undertaken afresh with the safety of air In April 2018 the Aircraft Noise Ombudsman navigation as the primary consideration and (ANO) released her report Investigation into will include: complaints about the introduction of new An assessment of the operability of the flight paths in Hobart April 2018. Airservices design implemented on 14 September accepted the ANO recommendations 2017, also including the planned change including that Airservices seek expertise in to the runway 30 STAR for community engagement. implementation in March 2018 Airservices retained Tania Parkes Recommendations for any changes that Consulting (TPC) to lead community would enhance the safety of the design engagement to better understand the balanced with minimising the effects of social impacts of the September 2017 and aircraft noise on the community as far as March 2018 Hobart flight path changes to practicable inform the Hobart Airspace Design Consideration of the requirements list in Review. the Operational Requirements and The Hobart Airspace Design Review is a Constraints section of the Terms of technical review being undertaken by Reference. Airservices. Given Airservices requirements to consider Within the operational requirements and safety as the most important consideration constraints at Hobart Airport, Airservices will and the regulatory requirements to utilise review the design of the Standard Instrument satellite-based navigation, SIDs and STARs Departures (SIDs) and Standard Instrument must continue to be utilised at Hobart Airport Arrivals (STARs) for runway 12 and runway to ensure the travelling public continue to 30. The Terms of Reference for the Design 4 CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT HOBART AIRSPACE CHANGES (SEPTEMBER 2017/MARCH 2018) receive the best level of air traffic control Pre-consultation stakeholder introductions were service with the safest outcomes. made in May 2018 and broader community consultation sampling of areas affected positively The initial findings of the Design Review are and negatively by the new flight paths was expected to be ready for consultation in undertaken in June 2018. This report describes August 2018. the key themes that arose from the community TPC was also tasked with assisting Airservices to feedback and together with desktop research, the develop an engagement plan with community considerations to which those themes gave rise. input that would form the basis for consultation on the Hobart Airspace Design Review when the Tania Parkes Consulting thanks all initial findings are available. The June 2018 consultation participants and contributors to consultations informed the draft Community this research. Engagement Plan. 5 CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT HOBART AIRSPACE CHANGES (SEPTEMBER 2017/MARCH 2018) 3.0 Key Themes The issues raised by the community through the impacts of the combined affects of several events June 2018 community engagement can be on people’s lives. summarised under the following themes: Community connectedness Compounding affect The divergent views across the south east region The noise created by aircraft travelling on the new about the impact of new flight path changes has flight paths, in addition to other traumatic events contributed to fragmenting the cohesiveness of that individuals, families, businesses and communities. communities have experienced, has had a Many consultation participants expressed that compounding affect. while the villages and towns may have small These events include the 2013 bushfires which populations, they consider themselves as destroyed hundreds of homes and properties in connected and interdependent communities. The Tasmania’s south east region. sense of kinship is strong having had to rebuild Location of the Forcett - Dunalley fire on 18 January 2013i their lives and communities after the 2013 bushfires. They look out for one another. An alternate view was voiced on social media and privately by some parts of the community who differentiate between what is said to be the ‘new comers’ to the area compared with those who have lived there for many years. These people say the increased flights do not overly impact them and point to the economic benefit of increased flights bringing more tourism and enterprise