World Bank Document

RP24 Volume 6

REPUBUC OF THE PHIUPPINES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE FOR IBRD

NATIONAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROJECT - PHASE I (NRIMP-I) DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF

Public Disclosure Authorized SURIGAO-DAVAO COASTAL ROAD (CW-RU-1.4 A) BACUAG-GIGAQUIT-CLAVER SECTION

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) (Volume 1/6) MAIN TEXT Public Disclosure Authorized

JUNEJUE202FILE 2002 COPY

LIZ EI KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL

Public Disclosure Authorized in association with

ialCrow HALCROW GROUP LIMITED TECHNIKS GROUP CORPORATION

{|> wDCCD ENGINEERING CORPORATION MULTI-INFRA KONSULT, INC.

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)

NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASE I(NRIMP-I)

BACUAG-GIGAQUIT-CLAVER SECTION

VOLUME I

JUNE 2002'

KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume I (Main Text) Page Executive Summary

1. Rationale 1

2. Objectives 1

3. Methodology

3.1 Institutional Collaboration 2 3.2 Data and Sources 2 3.3 Population 3 3.4 Analytical Tools 3

4. Public Consultation Proceedings 4

5. Resettlement Action Plan

5.1 Project Description 4

5.2 The Local Government Units 6 5.2.1 Bacuag 6 5.2.2 Gigaquit 7 5.2.3 Claver 8

5.3 Socio-Economic Profile of Project Affected Families 9 5.3.1 Demography 10 5.3.2 Economy 13 5.3.3 Level of Living 15

5.4 Project Impacts 5.4.1 Impacts on Land 17 5.4.2 Impacts on Structures 17 5.4.3 Loss of Income 17 5.4.4 Impact on Land Improvements 18

5.5 Compensation Package 5.5.1 Entitlements 18 5.5.2 Affected Structures 18 5.5.3 Severely Affected Structures 19 5.5.4 Compensation Matrix 19 5.5.5 Value of Land Improvement in Absentee Landholdings 27

5.5.6 Compensation Matrix for Residents PAFs 27

5.5.7 Compensation Package 27

5.5.8 RAP Implementation Cost 30

5.5.9 Distribution of Total Compensation by Municipality30

5.5.10 Total RAP Cost 32

6. Implementation Schedule 33

6.1 MOU and Establishment of Committees 33 6.2 Training-Orientation on RAP Implementation 33 6.3 Validation of RAP Report 33 6.4 Public Information Campaign 33 6.5 Finalization of the Compensation Package 34 6.6 Public Meeting/Disclosure 34 6.7 Cut-off Date 34 6.8 Payment 34 6.9 Handing Over the Site for Civil Works 34

7. Monitoring and Evaluation 35

Appendix A Public Consultations

1. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Surigao-Davao Coastal Road, DPWH-XIII Regional Office, Butuan City, Agusan del Sur, January 3, 2001

2. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road, DPWH Surigao City, Surigao del Norte, January 4, 2001 3. Public Consultation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road Gigaquit Municipal Hall, Surigao del Norte, January 22, 2001

Appendix B List of PAFs

Appendix C List of Perennials

Volume II (Appendix)

Appendix D Composite Profile of Marginally Affected PAFs

Appendix E Composite Profile of Severely Affected PAFs

Appendix F Questionnaire LIST OF TABLES

Table No.

5.1 Road Length by Segment and by Type of Road, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.2.1 Road Classification by Type of Pavement in Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.2.3 Road Classification by Type of Pavement in Claver, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3 Distribution by Type of Respondents and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

4.3.1a Distribution of Respondents by Ethnicity and by Extent of Impact and municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.1b Mean Age of Respondents by Educational Level and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.1c Distribution by Household Size and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.1d Distribution by Household Structure and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.2a Primary Occupation by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.2b Mean and Median Income by Source and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.3.3 Level of Household Amenities by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.5.4 Compensation Entitlement Matrix

5.5.7 Compensation Package for Resident PAFs by Use of Structure and Other Entitlements, RAP, Surigao Del Norte, 2001

5.5.8 Budget requirement for RAP Implementation, Surigao del Norte, 2001

5.5.10.1 Estimated Compensation Package for Marginally Affected Structures by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001 5.5.10.2 Estimated Compensation Package for Severely Affected Structures by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001 5.5.10.3 Estimated Compensation Package fro Crop Improvements by Municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

6 RAP Implementation Schedule by Activity, Surigao del Norte, 2001 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-ClaverRoad

Resettlement Action Plan: Bacuag-Qigaquit-Claver Road

Executive Summary

1. Development interventions such as physical infrastructures undoubtedly result into significant positive impacts to the community and the residents both in terms of economic and social activities. However, it is equally true that any development intervention results in some negative externalities. In the case of road infrastructure projects, the obvious negative consequence would be in terms of the social costs associated with environmental damage and human dislocation.

The department has promulgated the social policy framework and specific guidelines for the implementation of projects under NRIMP. The framework and specific guidelines are operationalized in the Policy Framework for Land Acquisition Resettlement and Rehabilitation (LARR) in general, and in the principles outlined for the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), in particular. The said framework is anchored on the philosophy that the adverse impact of NRIMP should be avoided, minimized and/or mitigated to ensure that the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) will not be worse off, if not, benefit from the project. Implicit in the framework are elements of just disturbance compensation based on fair market value and replacement cost, participatory process through local consultations, and internal/external monitoring to ensure proper and effective implementation of the projects. In order to operationalize the policies and principles outlines earlier, it is necessary to conduct rigorous and systematic assessment of the project areas based on acceptable standards in research methods and analysis.

2. In general, the objective of the RAP is to assess the extent of disturbance that NRIMP project will cause to local settlers and to provide the structure for RAP including the logistical requirements for implementation. Specifically, the objectives of RAP include: to set up a process to allow for public consultations with PAPs on the NRIMP projects; to determine the number and geographically locate the PAPs and assess the extent of disturbance; to estimate, based on current market value and replacement cost, the disturbance compensation; to provide the operational mechanisms for timely -RAP implementation including total budgetary allocations; and to formulate the terms of reference for internal and external monitoring of RAP implementation.

RAP preparation and implementation was designed as a collaborative effort among three key institutions, DPWH, the LGUs, and the consulting firm. To ensure smooth implementation and effective coordination among these institutions, a series of orientation and public consultations were organized.

documents. Further, secondary data were also generated pertaining to assessed values of land improvement including structures and productive crops. Secondary data pertaining to the technical description of the project design were used in the linear acquisition and mapping. The determination of the compensation matrix for each of the affected households and the total compensation package was fairly straight forward. Valuation of structures affected by the Project were based on the concept of Replacement Cost. Values were determined based on the estimated quantity of materials needed to put up a structure similar to the one that will be demolished due to the Project and monetized using the current prices of materials as per records of the District Engineer's Office. Similarly, valuation of agricultural and other biological land improvements were based on the assessed value provided for by the District Engineer's Office. In special cases where additional entitlements were required, valuation schemes based on the principles outlined in the LARR Policy were adopted. The mechanical routine of generating summary of actual values were accomplished by simple algorithmic instructions for the computers using standard application software. The cost component of RAP implementation was determined by employing simple budget planning.

4. To ensure that the implementation of RAP will be done smoothly, it was embodied in the policy framework of NRIMP to undergo a series of public consultation. The public consultation was done at two levels. i.e. at the municipal level and at the barangay level.

5. The Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary Road segment under NRIMP I is part of the long- term development of the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road. However, for Phase I of NRIMP, the Surigao Norte Contract Package is only one of the three which includes Marihatag-Barobo-San Francisco Road in Surigao del Sur and Mati-Manay in Davao Oriental.

The Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary road improvement section comprises of two sections which apparently stretches across the three municipalities for a total road length of about 44.5 kilometers.

The other segment which starts from the town of Claver up to the provincial boundary is generally a gravel road. Only about 2.7 kilometers of road is paved with concrete and the remaining stretch of roughly 26 kilometers is paved with gravel characterized as either in very bad or bad condition.

6. The total number of affected structures is 159. However, some affected structures did not have any valid responses with respect to the type of respondents (60). This is because some are public infrastructures and public utilities where it is not possible to identify a specific respondent for such type of structures. In some cases, the owners of the affected structures are absentees or not available. These types of affected structures totaled to 60 which account for about 38 percent of the total number of structures. Therefore, in the foregoing NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-ClaverRoad j

social and economic characterization, most responses will only be valid for 99 cases.

7. Across the entire stretch, from Bacuag to the Boundary of Surigao del Norte, the modal ethnic origin of the PAFs is Bisaya which accounts for 67 percent. The next significant (30.8%) group is categorized as others and this group generally refers to the ethno-linguistic affiliation indigenous to the area which is "Surigaonon". These two groups account for practically all of the respondents (98%).

The average age of the respondents is about 47 years old. Across municipalities, the mean age ranges from 37 years in Bacuag to 51 years in Gigaquit. The average age among Claver respondents which is roughly 46.5 years is much closer to the mean.

In terms of the level of educational attainment, the modal class is elementary graduate with proportion estimated to be 31.3 percent. In cumulative terms, about 60 percent of the respondents were unable to complete high school education. About 17 percent completed high school and college graduates account for 14 percent of the total respondents. It is interesting to note that the proportion of those who did not have any form of education at all is only one percent.

The modal household size is 5 per family. However, it must be noted that household sizes of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 each have proportions clustering between 10 and 11 percent. At the extreme ends of the distribution, about six percent are single households and about 2 percent have either 11 or twelve members.

Slightly more than half (50.5%) of the respondents are characterized under a nuclear household. However, also a relatively higher proportion (43%) are extended households. This, implies that, as the household matures, in a considerable number of cases, members are unable to establish their own households. Extended households can be interpreted as an indication of very limited economic opportunities in the community.

8. The modal occupation of the Project Affected Families (PAFs) is business operation. This primary occupation accounted for roughly 35 percent of the respondents. Farming is also relatively significant with an estimated proportion of about 15 percent of the respondents. The same proportion is attributed to those who are engaged in fulltime housekeeping. The very notable statistical information is the fact that about 21 percent of the respondents are not engaged in any occupation at all. The very minimal proportion of those engaged in other occupations is indicative of the very limited opportunities in the community. Only about 4 percent are employed in their respective profession, 5 percent as skilled laborers and one percent as hired farm worker. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-ClaverRoad iv

9. To put the income distribution in proper perspective, it must be recalled that the instrument was designed to solicit income information only if the structure will be affected severely. Hence, income variables are only supposed to be valid for severe PAFs. Further, it must also be recalled that there are severely affected structures which are public by nature, thus, there are no valid responses to income variables. There are also absentee owners where soliciting the required income variables were not possible.

Given the various primary occupation, the average level of total income is about PhP92,921. The mean is highest among Bacuag residents and lowest from the PAFs in Claver. Respondents from Gigaquit are also relatively well off with an estimated average total income of about PhP118,349. Farm income is very minimal. This implies that the PAFs are relying more on non-farm economic opportunities.

It must be noted that in all cases, the mean is higher than the median which indicates a relatively skewed income distribution. Relatively few individuals are earning extremely high levels of income and the majority are earning low. In fact, in case of farm income, the median is zero which indicates that at least half of the respondents did not have farm-income opportunities.

10. The modal type of dwelling among the PAFs across all municipalities is temporary (35.7%). Semi-permanent dwelling account for about 32 percent. However, a relatively higher proportion are also living in permanent dwellings (17.9%). It must be noted that about 14.3 percent of the PAFs are living in shanties. By municipality, Gigaquit does not reflect the modal class of all the PAFs combined because in the town, the modal class is semi-permanent. The few PAFs in Bacuag are split equally between those living in permanent and those in temporary dwellings with each sharing an estimated proportion of 3.6 percent.

The proportion of the respondents with access to electrical power is relatively high. About 90 percent of the total household respondents are able to access electrical energy. The other ten percent is divided into two: those who are using kerosene gas for lighting (3.6%) and those using oil for lamp (7.1%). The kerosene users are concentrated in Claver while the oil lamp users are mostly residents of Gigaquit.

Majority of the PAFs, in aggregate terms, have access to potable water through pump well system. Access to the other types of water system is practically split between the two extremes. On the one hand, about 28 percent access water through pipe systems. On the other hand, 21 percent of the PAFs are still collecting rain water. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-ClaverRoad v

The modal fuel type used is wood (67.9%) and about 28.6 percent are using LPG for cooking. The remaining 3.6 percent is accounted for by those who use kerosene gas for cooking. About 68 percent of the respondents are using either semi flush toilet facilities. However, the proportion of those who are still using the antipolo system is still relatively high at 14.3 percent. It must be stressed here that also a relatively higher proportion of the PAFs does not have any toilet facilities at all.

11. The project design for the entire Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary section of NRIM-Phase I generally followed the center line of the existing road pavements. There were a few cases where realignments were made; however, these realignments are within the existing Right of Way (ROW) as established by the District Engineer's Office in Surigao City, Surigao del Norte. Hence, there are no land acquisitions in this particular section of the road improvement project

12. Based on the RAP Census, 159 structures will be affected by the road improvement project: 113 are privately owned structures. Of these 113, 82 PAFs are severely affected while 31 are marginally affected. 46 structures are public such as Barangay Waiting Sheds, electric posts and structures for public utilities among others.

Of the total 159 structures, about 119 will be severely affected and 40 will be marginally affected. In Bacuag, there are more public than private structure affected. The same pattern is also true for Claver. However, in Gigaquit, more private structures are affected.

The most common use of the structures affected is residential (39.5%). Structures used both for residential and commercial purposes are also fairly common. These structures account for about 21 percent of those affected by the project. A considerable number of commercial structures have also been affected by the project as well as public structures and utilities and a smaller proportion of other structures such as churches and fences.

13. In some cases, particularly if the structures are used for commercial purposes, income loss is also a significant consequence of the road improvement projects. The proportion of structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes will provide an indicative extent of the income loss. Based on the LARR policy, income loss is estimated on the basis of foregone earnings of the commercial establishment during the construction period not exceeding the equivalent income for thirty days.

14. Within the area of affected structures particularly those which are residential, there are agricultural improvements that will be affected by the project. The most common crops are coconuts and fruit trees. However, the bulk of the disturbance on agricultural crop improvements are along the less settled areas of the road NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-ClaverRoad vi

where lands are cultivated but the farmers are non-residents in that specific area. In such cases, the census was done to merely locate the specific crop improvements and value the crops in terms of the current prices available at the District Engineers' Office.

15. The most number of severely affected structures is in the municipality of Claver with a count of 58 and an estimated share of about 49.6 percent, then Gigaquit comes second highest with an estimated severely affected structures accounting for roughly 39 percent. Bacuag account for only about 11 percent of the total severely affected PAFs. By municipality, the aggregate distribution that more residential structures are affected is also reflected in Claver and Gigaquit. However, in the case of Bacuag, there are more public and commercial/residential that are affected than there are residential.

There are 40 marginally affected structures in the road improvement section in the Bacuag-Claver Provincial Boundary road improvement project. Most of these structures are residential which account for about 45 percent of the total. A considerable proportion (25%) of commercial/residential structures will also be affected. Among these marginally affected PAFs, the high proportion of residential structures is consistent across the three municipalities.

On the basis of the first cluster of crop improvements, banana and coconut are the most common valuable crop improvement in areas along the highway. In terms of the broader classifications, fruit trees and forest trees also account for a considerable number of the affected improvements on the land. The complete listings of all affected improvements along the highway is outlined in Annex E.

16. The total compensation package for 40 marginally affected structures is estimated at roughly PhP639,246. This compensation package includes replacement costs to structures, crop improvements within the vicinity of the structure, and forgone earnings for structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes.

There are about 119 severely affected structures with an estimated total entitlements of PhP3,839,137. This package is spread across the three municipalities, by types of structures.

By municipality, as in the case of the marginally affected structures, Claver accounts for more than half of the total compensation package for the three municipalities with an estimated cost of about PhP376,006. Again, the remaining portion is shared between the other two municipalities: PhP243,435 for Gigaquit and for Bacuag, PhP19,806.

17. In addition to the compensation package to the PAFs, RAP implementation will entail overhead and logistical costs. This cost covers the management of the implementation process, honoraria to field personnel and committee members, maintenance and operating expenses and financial administration, among others. NRJMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaguit-ClaverRoad vii

18. The following is the summary of the total estimated cost of the RAP including the cost of implementation:

Compensation Package

Marginal Effect on Structures PhP 639,246

Severe Effect on Structures PhP 3,839,137

Income Loss PhP 662,770

Relocation Allowance PhP 700

Land Improvements PhP 22, 405

Affected Trees PhP 332,725

Sub-Total PhP 5,496,983

Contingencies

Allowance for Inflation (based on the 2000 rate for CARAGA @ 3.4) PhP 186,897

Estimation Error @ 5% 274,849

RAP Implementation @ 10 % PhP 549,698 of total Compensation

Sub-Total PhP 1,010,444

External Monitoring $ 2,000.00

As summarized, the total cost of the RAP is PhP 6,507,427 and $2,000.00

18. The underlying principle of the LARR Policy Framework, in general, and the RAP in particular, is to provide mitigating measures to at least ensure that the PAFs will not be worse off as a consequence of the road improvement project. It is for this reason that the survey instrument was designed to capture the critical aspects of the PAFs social and economic conditions to provide the benchmark for future assessments in the context of monitoring and evaluation. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) BACUAG-GIGAQUIT-CLAVER ROAD PROJECT NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

1. RATIONALE

Development interventions such as physical infrastructures undoubtedly result into significant positive impacts to the community and the residents both in terms of economic and social activities. However, it is equally true that any development intervention results in some negative externalities. In the case of road infrastructure projects, the obvious negative consequence would be in terms of the social costs associated with environmental damage and human dislocation.

Within the framework of the DPWH Medium-Term Development Program (1999-2004), the Department has been introducing institutional reforms. In particular, the Agency has institutionalized, through the creation of offices in the department, the in-house capability to assess the social and environmental consequences of the projects under the National Roads Improvement and Management Program (NRIMP).

Hence, the department has promulgated the social policy framework and specific guidelines for the implementation of projects under NRIMP. The framework and specific guidelines are operationalized in the Policy Framework for Land Acquisition Resettlement and Rehabilitation (LARR) in general, and in the principles outlined for the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), in particular. The said framework is anchored on the philosophy that the adverse impact of NRIMP should be avoided, minimized and/or mitigated to ensure that the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) will not be worse off, if not, benefit from the project. Implicit in the framework are elements of just disturbance compensation based on fair market value and replacement cost, participatory process through local consultations, and internal/external monitoring to ensure proper and effective implementation of the projects.

In order to operationalize the policies and principles outlined earlier, it is necessary to conduct rigorous and systematic assessment of the project areas based on acceptable standards in research methods and analysis.

2. OBJECTIVES

In general, the objective of the RAP is anchored on two basic principles: prevent, if possible, the dislocation of local settlers and if the disturbance is unavoidable then the objective of RAP is to assess the extent of disturbance that NRIMP project will cause to local settlers, provide mitigating measures to minimize the impact and to provide compensation to actual damages to properties and other land improvements. The RAP NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 2

will also provide the mechanisms for implementation including the logistical and administrative.

Specifically, the objectives of RAP include:

2.1. to set up a process to allow for public consultations with PAPs on the NRIMP projects;

2.2. to determine the number and geographically locate the PAPs and assess the extent of disturbance;

2.3. to estimate, based on current market value and replacement cost, the disturbance compensation;

2.4. to provide the operational mechanisms for timely RAP implementation including total budgetary allocations; and

2.5. to formulate the terms of reference for internal and external monitoring of RAP implementation.

3. METHODOLOGY

3.1. Institutional Collaboration

RAP preparation and implementation was designed as a collaborative effort among three key institutions, DPWH, the LGUs, and the consulting Firm. To ensure smooth implementation and effective coordination among these institutions, a series of orientation and public consultations were organized.

On the one hand, orientation programs were organized to enable DPWH and LGU staff members who will be involved in RAP preparation and implementation to appreciate the philosophy and principles behind the RAP. On the other hand, public consultations were designed to inform settlers along the sites about the project and the expected consequences to the community and the households.

3.2. Data and Sources

The basic inputs for RAP preparation include primary and secondary data. Secondary data about the overall social and economic situation obtaining in the communities along the project sites were generated through municipal documents. Further, secondary data were also generated pertaining to the valuation of affected structures and land improvements. For affected structures, prevailing market prices of construction materials were generated to assess the replacement costs. For agricultural improvements, NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 3

current assessed value of crops and other commercial trees were also solicited from the Assessors' Office. Secondary data pertaining to the technical description of the project design were used in the linear acquisition and mapping.

Primary data were also generated through actual Project Affected Persons (PAPs) and key-informants. Attributes of PAPs at the household level were generated through the administration of a structured survey instrument and through complete enumeration of the identified PAPs. Critical primary data were also solicited from key-informants. For instance, technical informations were required to determine the number of Project Affected Families (PAFs) and the extent of disturbance. Right of Way (ROW) limits were solicited from the appropriate key-informants at the District Engineer's Office.

3.3. Population

Because of the nature of the problem, it is required that complete enumeration of all affected structures, families, and all other land improvements will have to be accounted for to establish the impact of the road improvement project.

3.4. Analytical Tools

In order to put the Resettlement Action Plan in proper perspective, there was need to characterize the communities affected by the project. This was done by employing descriptive statistical analysis of both secondary and primary data pertaining to the respective communities. Specifically, the analysis involved the use of the standard measures of central tendencies, dispersions and distributions.

The determination of the compensation matrix for each of the affected households and the total compensation package was fairly straight forward. Valuation of structures affected by the Project was based on the concept of Replacement Cost. Values were determined based on the estimated quantity of materials needed to put up a structure similar to the one that will be demolished due to the Project and monetized using the current prices of materials as per records of the District Engineer's Office. Similarly, valuation of agricultural and other biological land improvements were based on the assessed value provided for by the District Engineer's Office. In special cases where additional entitlements were required, valuation schemes based on the principles outlined in the LARR Policy were adopted (Annex A).

The mechanical routine of generating summary of actual values were accomplished by simple algorithmic instructions for the computers using standard application software. The cost component of RAP implementation was determined by employing simple budget planning. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 4

4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCEEDINGS

To ensure that the implementation of RAP will be done smoothly, it was embodied in the policy framework of NRIMP to undergo a series of public consultation. The public consultation was done at two levels. i.e. at the municipal level and at the barangay level.

Two orientation meetings were conducted at the earlier stage of the RAP preparation report. Both meetings were facilitated by the Chief of EIAPO. The first was conducted at the DPWH CARAGA Regional Office in Butuan City and the second was at the Surigao del Norte District Engineer's Office in Surigao City.

Due to the proximity the three municipalities affected by the Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver road improvement project, it was deemed sufficient to hold a single consultation in the municipality of Gigaquit which is the town at the middle.

To ensure wider participation, particularly among potential PAFs, letters of communications were sent earlier to notify the respective LGU officials. As indicated in Annex B.3, the consultation was well attended including the three respective mayors, the Barangay Chairmen of the affected communities and potential PAFs.

During this consultation, in attendance was only LGUs but there were representatives of PAFs in every barangay.

Annex B outlines the highlights of the proceedings in both orientation meeting and public consultations. The orientation meetings were basically centered on the introduction of NRIMP and the LARR Policy Framework because the audience were the implementers of RAP.

Consequently, most of the discussions clustered about issues relating to the Role of the DPWH Regional and District staff members. In contrast, because the audience of the public consultations were the potential PAFs, issues revolved around compensation and entitlements.

5. RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN

5.1. Project Description

The Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver Road segment under NRIMP I is part of the long- term development of the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road. However, for Phase I of NRIMP, the Surigao Norte Contract Package is only one of the three which includes Marihatag- Barobo-San Francisco Road in Surigao del Sur and Mati-Manay in Davao Oriental. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 5

Figure 5.1. Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver road section of NRIMP -1, Surigao del Norte, 2001. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 6

The Bacuag-Gigaquit-Claver road improvement section comprises of two sections which apparently stretches across the three municipalities for a total road length of about 44.5 kilometers (Table 5.1).

The first segment starts from Bacuag to the town proper of Claver. The segment is about 15.7 kilometers long. Only about 4 kilometers of the entire stretch of road is paved with concrete cement and about half a kilometer is characterized to be in either very bad or bad condition. The remaining segment of about 11.8 kilometers is paved with gravel where six kilometers is characterized as either in good or fair condition and the remaining 5.8 is in bad or very bad condition.

Table 5.1. Road length by segment and by type of road, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Segment | Condition - LengthbyType |'Totai lPCC J AC I Grav Earth| Length

Good/Fair 3 -- 6.0 J (kn) Bacuag- Claver ^ Bad/V Bad 0.4, 5.8 6.2 | Impassable - F - .Sub Tote-l V' . | .8 g

5.2. The Local Government Units

5.2.1. Bacuag

Bacuag is, relatively speaking, an old municipality. The influx of migrants, generally from the province of Bohol, started as early as the 1880s and the municipality itself was established in 1919. In the earlier developments. The municipality was then comprised of only five brarangays. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 7

The municipality is spread across a total land area of about 14,617 hectares divided into 9 different barangays. Close to half (44%) of the municipality are mountainous with patches of forest, grass lands, swamps, and marshes. The remaining portion of arable lands are being utilized generally for low intensive agricultural production.

Table 5.2.1. Road classification by type of pavement in Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Classification Length Pavement Concrete Earth Gravel National 3.100 3.100 Provincial 8.307 8.307 Municipal 23.758 1.365 22.393 Barangay 86.333 0.210 86.124 Total 99.106 1.575 97.531

Source: MPDO, Bacuag, Surigao del Norte, 1997.

The available statistics based on the socio-economic profile of the municipality is quite old (1997). In recent years there have been construction of concrete pavement along the national passing through the municipality. However, for the other portions of the municipality, most of the characterization in terms of the level of road infrastructures would still be very relevant. Even the recent characterization presented earlier as part of the project description indicated the very low level of concrete pavement in the Bacuag- Claver segment of the road.

The total length of the road network for the municipality is quite minimal. For the total length of about 99 kilometers of road, only about 1.5 kilometers were paved with concrete in 1997. The remaining 97.5 kilometers are paved with gravel and the bulk of the roads are classifies as barangay roads. In terms of road density, the municipality has about 688 meters of gravel pavement per square kilometer of land area and about ten meters of concrete pavement per square kilometer.

5.2.2. Gigaquit

Gigaquit is the second to the last town to the south towards the provincial boundary to Surigao del Sur. The general topography of the town is mountainous. From a relatively short distance from the shorelines, the area of the town abruptly rises towards the Diwata Mountain ranges. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 8

The municipality is composed of 13 barangays spread across an area of about 23,570 hectares. Most of the arabe lands are devoted to the production of coconut and some irrigated lands are devoted to the production of rice.

The road network of the municipality is relatively less extensive. The only portion paved with concrete is about a kilometer of road along the highway cutting through Barangay San Isidro and about 4 kilometers from the highway towards the Central Business District of the municipality.

There are on-going attempts by special projects funded by the World Bank to provide irrigation and farm to market roads in the municipality particularly in the in Barangay San Isidro. Specifically, an eleven kilometer all-weather road is under construction to connect the upland barangays of Lahi and Sico-sico to the lowland communities. At this point in time, the only practical means of access to the upland barangays is through Daywan river via pump boats.

5.2.3. Claver

Claver, as a geo-political unit, became a municipality only in 1955. Hence, relative to the other municipalities in the province, it is a very young town. The total land area of the municipality stretches to about 32,262 hectares of land spread across 14 barangays including an island and a few islets. The total population of the town is about 17,376.

While the area is quite huge, most are spread along the mountainous sections and are therefore classified as forest lands. Only about 30 percent of the land area has been declared alienable and disposable (A&D) lands.

Table 5.2.3. Road classification by type of pavement in Claver, Surigao del None, 2001.

Classification Length Pavement Concrete Earth Gravel National Provincial Municipal 8.638 2.484 2.368 3.786 Barangay 14.027 1.020 5.722 7.285 Total 22.665 3.504 8.090 11.071

Source: MPDO, Claver, Sungao del Norte, 2000. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 9

The available data set provided by the Municipal Planning and Development Office (MPDO) does not contain information on the length and classification of roads under the administrative jurisdiction of the provincial and national agencies. The total length of the road network for the municipality of Claver is very low. The total length of concrete is about 3.5 kilometers; however, but the total road length is only 22.6 kilometers. Further, a high proportion of the road network is still earth pavement.

Considering that the area of the municipality is relatively large, then the road density would indeed seem very minimal. In terms of the total road length, the density is only about 70 meters per square kilometer of land area.

5.3. Socio-Economic Profile of Project Affected Families

The total number of affected structures is 159. However, some affected structures did not have any valid responses with respect to the type of respondents (60). This is because some are public infrastructures and public utilities where it is not possible to identify a specific respondent for such type of structures. In some cases, the owners of the affected structures are absentees or not available. These types of affected structures totaled to 60 which account for about 38 percent of the total number of structures (Table 5.3). Therefore, in the foregoing social and economic characterization, most responses will only be valid for 99 cases.

Among the affected structures with valid responses, the modal type of respondent is the spouse with an estimated proportion of roughly 40 percent. Husbands, as respondents, accounted for about 18 percent and a minimal proportion (3.8%) of the respondents were the children.

Table 5.3 Distribution by Type of Respondents and by Municipality, Surigao del Norte

Municipality Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total

Respondent Not Applicable Count 7 24 29 58 % of Total 4.5% 14.0% 18.5% 36.9%

Husband Count 2 15 12 29 % of Total 1.3% 10.2% 7.0% 18.5%

Spouse Count 8 24 32 64 % of Total 5.0% 15.1% 20.1% 40.3%

Child Count 3 3 6 % of Total 1.9% 1.9% 3.8% Total Count 17 66 76 159 % of Total 10.7% 41.5% 47.8% 100.00% NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 10

53.1. Demography

As raised in the previous section, there are only 99 cases with valid types of respondents and hence, the only cases where socio-economic characterization is possible. In most characterization, therefore, the number of cases with valid responses is 99.

Across the entire stretch, from Bacuag to the Boundary of Surigao del Norte, the modal ethnic origin of the PAFs is Bisaya which accounts for 67 percent, 33 percent of which are PAFs who owns marginally affected structures while 67 percent are Bisayan PAFs with severely affected structures (Table 5.3.1a). The next significant group generally refers to the ethno-linguistic affiliation indigenous to the area, which is "Surigaonon". This group accounts for about 30 percent of the total number of valid cases. Severely affected Surigaonon PAFs represents a total of about 77 percent while those marginally affected PAFs only represents about one fourth of the total Surigaonon PAFs.

There are no information on the chronology of the influx of Christian migrants in the area and also with respect to their cultural makeup. Surigaonon and Bisaya are two of the dominant ethno-linguistic groups in the area. These groups, however, are not classified as indigenous people.

PAFs along the Bacuag-Claver segment include migrants from Ilocos, Southern Tagalog, and Visayas. However, most identify themselves as either Bisaya or Surigaonon. Majority of the severely affected Bisayan PAFs reside in Claver. Severely affected Surigaonon PAFs, on the other hand, reside mostly in Gigaquit.

Table 5.3.1a. Distribution of respondents by ethnicity and by extent of impact and municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

Extent of Municipality Impact Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total Severe tlocano Count 1 I %of Total 1.4% 1.4% Tagalog Count I I %of Total 1.4% 1.4% Bisaya Count 3 17 25 45 %of Total 4.3% 24.3% 35.7% 64.3% Surigaonon Count 3 12 8 23 %of Total 4.3% 17.1% 11.4% 32.9% Total Count 6 29 35 70 %of Total 8.6% 41.4% 50.0% 100.0%, Marginal Bisaya Count 4 12 6 22 %of Total 13.8% 41.4% 20.7% 75.9% Surigaonon Count 1 6 7 %of Total 3.4% 20.7% 24.1% Total Count 4 13 12 29 %of Total 13.8% 44.8% 41.4% 100.0% NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 11

Table 5.3.1b indicates the mean age of the respondents by levels of educational attainment and by municipality.

Table 5.3.1b. Mean age of respondents by educational level and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Age (years) Municipality Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total Elementary Mean 80.00 63.12 55.38 60.47 Undergraduate n 1 8 8 17 %n 1.0% 8.1% 8.1% 17.2% Elementary Graduate Mean 41.00 58.77 48.06 52.32 n 1 13 17 31 %n 1.0% 13.1% 17.2% 31.3% HS Undergraduate Mean 29.00 72.33 52.83 53.82 n 2 3 6 11 %n 2.0% 3.0% 6.1% 11.1% HS Graduate Mean 32.00 37.29 33.80 34.71 n 5 7 5 17 %n 5.1% 7.1% 5.1% 17.2% College Undergraduate Mean 35.67 29.50 34.13 n 6 2 S %n 6.1% 2.0% College Graduate Mean 32.00 38.80 41.63 39.93 n 1 5 8 14 %n 1.0% 5.1% 8.1% 14.1%5. None Mean 51.00 51.00 n 1 %n 1.0% 1.0% Total Mean 37.10 51.31 46.57 47.63 n 10 42 47 99 %n 10.1% 42.4% 47.5% 100.0%

At this point, it would be worthy to note the distribution of the respondents by municipality. About 90 percent of the respondents are under the political jurisdictions of the municipalities of Claver (47.5%) and Gigaquit (42.4%). The remaining 10 percent are within the boundaries of Bacuag.

The modal household size is 5 per family (Table 5.3.1c). However, it must be noted that household sizes of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 each have proportions clustering between 10 and 11 percent. At the extreme ends of the distribution, about six percent are single households and about 2 percent have either 11 or twelve members.

Table 5.3.1c. Distribution by household size and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Municipality Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total HH 1 n 5 1 6 size %n 5.2% 1.0% 6.2% 2 n 2 5 3 1( %n 2.1% 5.2% 3.1% 10.3% 3 n 2 8 1( %n 2.1% 8.2% 10.37A. 4 n 4 6 1( %n 4.1% 6.2% 10.3% 5 n 1 9 15 2' %n 1 0% 9.3% 15.5% 25.8%. 6 n 4 5 2 ii %n 4.1% 5.2% 2.1% 11.3%A, 7 n 2 4 5 11 %n 2.1% 4.1% 5.2% 11.3%A. 8 n 1 3 3 7 %n 1.0% 3.1% 3.1% 7.2S% 10 n 2 3 E. %n 2.1% 3.1% 5.2%9. 11 n 1 1 %n 1.0% 1.0n 12 n 1 1 %n 1.0% 1n.0 Total n 10 41 46 97 %n 10.3% 42.3% 47.4% 100.0%

Slightly more than half (50.5%) of the respondents are characterized under a nuclear household (Table 5.3.1d). However, also a relatively higher proportion (43%) are extended households. This implies that, as the household matures, in a considerable number of cases, members are unable to establish their own households. Extended NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 13

households can be interpreted as an indication of very limited economic opportunities in the community.

Table 5.3.1d. Distribution by household structure and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Municipality Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total HH Single n 4 1 structure % n 4.1% 1.0% 5.2%5 Nuclear n 5 19 25 4') % n 5.2% 19.6% 25.8% 50.5%9 Extended n 5 17 20 4:' %n 5.2% 17.5% 20.6% 43.3%; Joint n I 1 %n 1.0% 1.0LK Total n 10 41 46 9'7 % n 10.3% 42.3% 47.4% 100.0%

53.2. Economy

The modal occupation of the Project Affected Families (PAFs) is business operation. This primary occupation accounted for roughly 35 percent of the respondents. Farming is also relatively significant with an estimated proportion of about 15 percent of the respondents.

The same proportion is attributed to those who are engaged in fulltime housekeeping. The very notable statistical information is the fact that about 21 percent of the respondents are not engaged in any occupation at all.

The very minimal proportion of those engaged in other occupations is indicative of the very limited opportunities in the community. Only about 4 percent are employed in their respective profession, 5 percent as skilled laborers and one percent as hired farm worker. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 14

Table 5.3.2a. Primary occupation by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Municipality Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total Primary Farmer n 5 10 15 Occupation %of n 5.1% 10.2% 15.3%.

Hired Farm Worker n I %ofn 1.0% 1,0% Skilled Labor n 3 2 5 %ofn 3.1% 2.0% 5.1% Professional Employment n 1 3 4 %ofn 1.0% 3.1% 4.1% Business Operator n 6 15 14 35 %ofn 6.1% 15.3% 14.3% 35.79, House Keeping n 3 5 7 15 %ofn 3.1% 5.1% 7.1% 15.3%, Others n I 1 2 %ofn 1.0% 1.0% 2.09.; None n 11 10 21 %ofn 11.2% 10.2% 2144% Total n 10 41 47 98 %ofn 10.2% 41.8% 48.0% 100.0%

To put the income distribution in proper perspective, it must be recalled that the instrument was designed to solicit income information only if the structure will be affected severely. Hence, income variables are only supposed to be valid for severe PAFs. Further, it must also be recalled that there are severely affected structures which are public by nature, thus, there are no valid responses to income variables. There are also absentee owners where soliciting the required income variables were not possible.

Consequently, Table 5.3.2b only represent 41 valid responses. Given the various primary occupation, the average level of total income is about PhP92,921. The mean is highest among Bacuag residents and lowest from the PAFs in Claver. Respondents from Gigaquit are also relatively well off with an estimated average total income of about PhP118,349. Farm income is very minimal. This implies that the PAFs are relying more on non-farm economic opportunities.

Table 5.3.2b Mean and median income by source and by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001

Non-Farm Total Municipality Farm Income Income Income Bacuag Mean 1,667 125,375 127,042 Median 0 82,125 87,125 N 3 3 3 Gigaquit Mean 6,510 111,839 118,349 Median 0 39,000 39,350 N 16 16 16 Claver Mean 3,973 65,802 69,775 Median 0 49,813 49,813 N 22 22 22 Total Mean 4,794 88,127 92,921 Median 0 54,000 54,000 N 41 41 41

5.33. Level of Living

The modal type of dwelling among the PAFs across all municipalities is temporary (35.7%, Table 533). Semi-permanent dwelling account for about 32 percent. However, a relatively higher proportion are also living in permanent dwellings (17.9%). It must be noted that about 14.3 percent of the PAFs are living in shanties. By municipality, Gigaquit does not reflect the modal class of all the PAFs combined because in the town, the modal class is semi-permanent. The few PAFs in Bacuag are split equally between those living in permanent and those in temporary dwellings with each sharing an estimated proportion of 3.6 percent.

Table 5.3.3. Level of household amenities by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

%of Total

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit aaver Total Type of Permanent 3.6% 3.6% 10.7% 17.9% house S houseSemi 17 9% 14.3% 32.1% Pcrmonent Temporary 3.6% 14.3% 17.9% 35.7%

Shanty 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% Total 7.1% 42.9% 50.0% 100.0%

%of Total

Municipality

Bacruag Gigaqutt Claver Total Lighting Electricity 7.1% 35.7% 46.4% 89.3%

Kerosene 3.6% 3.6%

Oil Lamp 7.1% 7.1% Total 7.1% 42.9% 50.0% 100.0%

%of Totat

Municpality

B.actag Gigaquit Ctaver Total Watec Rain 10.7% 10.7% 21.4% system Spring I River 3.6% 3.6%

Artesian Wetl 3.6% 3 6% Pump Welt 17.9% 25.0% 42.9% Piped Water 3.6% 10 7% 14.3% 28 6% Total 7.1% 429% 50.0% 100.0%

%of Total

Municipality

Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total Cooking Wood 3.6% 28.6% 35.7% 67.9% Fuel LPG 14.3% 143% 28.6%

Kerosene 3.6% 3.6%

Total 7.1% 42.9% 50.0% 100.0%

%of Total

Municipality

Bacuag G.gaquit Claver Total Toilet Open Pit 3 6% 3.6% facilities Antipolo 7.1% 7.1% 14.3%

Semi Flush 7.1% 321% 28.6% 67 9% None 14.3% 143% Total 7.1% 42.9% 500% 1000% NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 17

5.4. Project Impacts

5.4.1. Impacts on Land

The project design for mne entire iiacuag-Gigaquit-Claver section of NRIM-Phase I generally followed the center line of the existing road pavements. There were a few cases where realignments were made; however, these realignments are within the existing Right of Way (ROW) as established by the District Engineer's Office in Surigao City, Surigao del Norte. Hence, there are no land acquisitions in this particular section of the road improvement project.

5.4.2. Impacts on Structures

Census and inventory of affected assets were conducted in January- March 2001, including the conduct of baseline socio-economic survey for marginally and severely affected households. The cut-off date is 13 March 2001.

Based on the RAP Census, 159 structures will be affected by the road improvement project: 119 are structures which would be severely affected by the road improvement project and 40 will be marginally affected.

In both severe and marginally affected structures, the common use are residential, commercial, and commercial/residential (structures used for both residential and commercial purposes). Among severely affected structures, the three categories account for about three quarters (69%) of the total structures (Table 5.4.2). The remainder is spread across structures used as public infrastructures, public utilities and other uses such as walkways and school fences, among others.

The proportion of the three categories in the marginally affected structures is even much higher, which is estimated at about 77.5 percent. The remaining proportion is distributed across public infrastructures and other uses.

Of the 159 structures, the road project will affect 113 PAP households who will be adversely affected by the loss of their main structure (i.e. independent house, cum store or independent shops). 82 PAFs are severely affected and 31 are marginally affected. On NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 18

the other hand, 412 PAP households who are losing an estimated 3,810 trees and perennials of various species have been identified.

5.4.3. Loss of Income

In some cases, particularly if the structures are used for commercial purposes, income loss will also be a significant consequence of the road improvement projects. The proportion of structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes will provide an indicative extent of the income loss. Based on the LARR policy, income loss is estimated on the basis of foregone earnings of the commercial establishment during the construction period not exceeding the equivalent income for thirty days.

5.4.4. Impact on Land Improvements

Within the area of affected structures particularly those which are residential, there are agricultural improvements that will be affected by the project. The most common crops are coconuts and fruit trees. In cases such as these, improvements are assessed and valued using the current market prices of construction materials as provided by the District Engineers Office, Department of Public Works and Highways.

5.5. Compensation Package

5.5.1. Entitlements

There are no land acquisitions in the Bacuag-Claver-Provincial Bdry Road Section improvement project. Hence, the compensation entitlements are limited, as the case maybe, to affected structures, trees and other improvements and disturbance compensations such as foregone income and subsistence allowance for PAFs.

5.5.2. Affected Structures

Based on the guidelines, if the total floor area affected exceeds 20 percent of the total floor area of the structure, the impact is considered severe. In such cases, the whole structure will be acquired and estimated for payments. However, in the implementation of the survey, field workers were given the prerogative to deviate from the rigid 20 percent cut-off to allow for special cases for considerations. For instance, it will not require 20 percent of damage for light structures and shanties to destroy the stability of the structure; hence, judgments are made at the field where even at less 20 percent, some structures were considered to be severely affected. They are also cases where mitigation measures can be suggested to spare huge and expensive structures. All structures are within the ROW as established by the DPWH. Hence, entitlements are on the basis of NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 19

their being owners or tenants of structures. In this case, entitlements are patterned in the schedule outlined in Table 5.5.4.

5.53. Land Improvements in Absentee Landholdings

During the course of the RAP Survey, valuable land improvements along the roads were determined to be affected by the road improvement project. However, in cases where the landowners or tenants are non-settlers in the area, it was deemed appropriate for practical purposes, to simply locate the specific improvement along the road section and attach the corresponding value.

5.5.4. Compensation Matrix

In line with the aforementioned objectives and principles of resettlement (Chapter 3) and the legal framework (Chapter 4), the matrix below will be used in the settlement of claims for compensation for lost assets of PAPs. Unless otherwise indicated, payment of compensation and other entitlements and the extension of assistance will be given to PAP households, not individuals. No relocation site is being envisaged for the project. PAFs that will be adversely affected by the loss of their main structures will reorganize their structures on adjacent or nearby lots. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 20

Table 5.5.4 Entitlement Matrix

Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php) Arable Land Actual area needed by Owners with full title, tax declaration For the portion of the land needed: N/A the road project and the or who are covered by customary law + Cash compensation None equivalent to zonal value + remaining land is still (e.g. possessory rights, usufruct) or 10% (AO 50) economically viable other acceptable proof of ownership + Topping-up supplemental assistance equivalent to the difference between the zonal value + 10% and the fair market value in the area as established by the independent appraiser to be hired by the project +Cash compensation foT perennials of commercial value as determined by the DENR or the concemed appraisal committee +PAP will be given sufficient time to havvest crops on the subject land PAPs without title, tax declaration, or For the portion of the land needed: are N/A not covered by customary law +PAP will be given sufficient time to harvest crops (e.g., possessor rights, usufruct) or +Cash compensation for perennials of commercial other acceptable proof of ownership value as determined by the DENR or the concemed appraisal committee + Financial assistance to make up for land preparation in the amount of PhP150 per square meter Remaining land become Owners with full title, tax declaration +Cash compensation equivalent to zonal economically not viable or value +10% N/A who are covered by customary law (AO 50) or, if feasible, 'land for land' will be (i.e., PAP losing >20% (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or provided in terms of a new parcel of land of of land holding or even other acceptable proof of ownership equivalent productivity, when at a location acceptable to losing c20% but, PAP, and with long-term security the of tenure. remaining land is +Topping-up supplemental assistance not economically equivalent to viable the difference between the zonal anymore) value + 10% and the fair market value in the area as established by the independent appraiser to be hired by the project +Subsistence allowance of PhP15,000 +PAP will be given sufficient time to harvest crops +Cash compensation for perennials of commercial value as determined by the DENR or the concemed appraisal committee +If relocating, PAP to be provided free transportation +Rehabilitation assistance (skills training and other development activities) equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage in a I new income activity NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 21

Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php) PAPs without title, tax declaration, +Financiat assistance equivalent to the average annual N/A are not covered by customary law gross harvest for the past 3 years but not less than (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or lPb15,000 other acceptable proof of ownership +PAP will be given sufficient time to harvest crops +Cash compensation for perennials of commercial value as determined by the DENR or the concerned appraisal committee +Financial assistance to make up for land preparation in the amount of PhP150 per square meter +If relocating, PAP to be provided free transportation +Rehabilitation assistance (skills training and other development activities) equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage in a new income activity N/A Agricultural lessees As per RA 6389 and EO 1035: +Disturbance compensation equivalent to five times the average of the gross harvest on the land holding during te five preceding years but not less than PhP15,000. +Rehabilitation assistance (skills training and other development activities) equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage ina new income activity Temporary use of land N/A All PAPs +Compensation to be provided for loss of income during the period, standing crops, cost of soil restoration and damaged structures 2 Residential land N/A Actual area needed by Owners with full title, tax declaration For the portion of the land needed: and/or the road project and the or who are covered by customary law +Cash compensation equivalent to zonal value +10% (AO Commercial land remaining land isstill (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or 50) viable for continued use other acceptable proof acceptable +Topping-up supplemental None assistance equivalent to the proof of ownership difference between the zonal value +10% and the fair market value in the area as established by the independent appraiser to be hired by the project +Cash compensation for perennials of commercial value as determined by the DENR or the concemed appraisal committee NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 22

Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php) Remaining residential Owners with full title, tax declaration +Cash compensation equivalent to zonal value +10% N/A or commercial land or who are covered by customary law (AO 50) or, if feasible, 'land for land' will be provided in becomes not viable for (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or terms of a new parcel of land of equivalent market continued use. other acceptable value, proof of ownership at a location acceptable to PAP, and with long-term security of tenure. The replacement land should be of acceptable size under zoning laws or a plot of equivalent value, whichever is larger, in a nearby resettlement area with adequate physical and social infrastructure. When the affected holding is larger in value than the relocation plot, cash compensation will cover the difference in value. +Topping-up supplemental assistance equivalent to the difference between the zonal value +10% and the fair market value in the area as established by the independent appraiser to be hired by the project +Cash compensation for perennials of commercial value as determine by the DENR or concerned appraisal committee +If relocating, PAP to be provided free transportation Temporary use of land All PAPs +Compensation to be provided for loss of income during N/A the period, standing crops, cost of soil restoration and damaged structures 3 Main Structures Structure, with or Owners of structure will full title or +Compensation in cash for affected (e.g., house, without a building portion of the Residential - 18 PAFs tax declaration to the land or those structure, including the cost house cum shop)- permit, partially of restoring the remaining who are covered by customary law structure, as determined by the concemed appraisal Affected structure - Php 186,245 affected and the (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or committee 93 PAFs with no deduction for salvaged building Income loss remaining structure is . other acceptable proof of ownership materials. n/a Relocatiom n/a still viable for +PAPs who have business affected due to partial impact Rehabilitation nla continued use. on the structure are entitled to a subsistence allowance for Other n/a the loss of income during the reconstruction 28 PAFs period. (Such will be verified and computed by the Municipal Resettlement Implementing committee or RIC). Res'l/Comm'l - 10 PAFs

Affected structure - Php 320,282 Income loss - 196,200 Relocation - n/a Rehabilitation n/a Others n/a NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 23

Owners of structures, including +Compensation in cash shanty dwellers for affected portion of the in urban areas, have structure, including the cost of restoring the remaining no title or tax declaration to the land structure, as determined by the concemed appraisal or other acceptable proof of committee with no deduction for salvaged building ownership materials. +Shanty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go back R = 18 to PAFs their place of origin in the province or be shifted to govemment relocation sites will be provided free R/C = 10 PAFs transportation +PAPs who have business affected due to partial impact on the structure are entitled to a subsistence allowance for the loss of income during the reconstruction period. (Such will be verified and computed by the municipal Resettlement Implementing Committee or RIC). +Professional squatters will not receive compensation but they can collect their salvageable materials.

-Renters (tenants) of leased affected +Given 3 months notice on the schedule of demolition NA structures, including renters of shanty +If shifting isrequired, PAP dwellings is given transitional in urban areas allowance equivalent to one month rent of a similar structure within the same area None +For house tenants renting structures outside of, or within the ROW, and who have to transfer elsewhere, free transportation will be provided +Renting shanty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go back to their place of origin in the province or be shifted to govemment relocation sites will be provided free transportation Entire structure affected Owners of structures with full title or OR when +Compensation in cash for the entire structure at the remaining tax declaration to the land or those replacement cost as determined structure becomes not who are by the concerned covered by customary law appraisal committee without deduction for salvaged viable for continued (e.g., possessory rights, usufruct) or building materials. use, with or without a other acceptable proof of ownership +Inconvenience building permit allowance of PhP10,000 per PAP. +PAPs who have business affected due to the severe impact 65 PAFs on the structure are entitled to a subsistence allowance for the loss of income during the reconstruction period. (Such will be verified and computed by the RIC). +If relocation is necessary, free transportation will be provided +Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills training and other development activities and equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood ______(e.g., house cum shop) isno longer viable and the PAP ______will have to engage in a new income activityo_engage_in_a_new_income_ac__vity NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 24

Owners of structures., including +Compensation in cash for the entire shanty dwellers strructure at Residential - 44 PAFs in urban areas, have replacement cost as determined by the concemed no title or tax declaration to the land appraisal committee without deduction for salvaged Affected structure - Phpl ,436,723 or other acceptable proof of building materials. ownership Income loss n/a +Shanty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go back to their Relocation n/a place of origin in the province or be shifted to Rehabilitation R = 44 PAFs govemment relocation sites will be provided free Allowance R/C = 21 PAFs transportation n/s +PAPs who have business affected due to the severe impact on the structure are entitled to a subsistence House cum shop - 21 PAFs allowance for the loss of income during the reconstruction period. (Such will be verified and Affected computed structure - Php 1,175,624 by the RIC). Income +If loss 191,770 relocation is necessary, free transportation will be Rehabilitation provided Allowance n/a +Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills training and other development activities and equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood (e.g., house cum shop) is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage in a new income activity +Professional squatters will not receive compensation but they can collect their salvageable materials NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 25

Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php) Renters (tenants) of leased affected +Given 3 month notice on the schedule of demolition structures, including renters of shanty +PAP is given transitional allowance equivalent to one dwellings in urban areas month tent of a similar structure within the same area +For house tenants renting structures outside of, or within R = I PAFs the ROW, and who have to transfer elsewhere, free R/C = 1 PAFs transportation will be provided +Renting shaty dwellers in urban areas who opt to go back to their place of origin in the provicne or be shifted to govemment relocation sites will be provided free transportation +Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills training and other development activities and equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided incoordination with other government agencies if the present means of livelihood (e.g., house cum shop) is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage in a new income 4 Independent activity Shops, with or without Owners of structure with or without +Compensation shops (structures) building in cash for affected portion of the Commercial - 3 PAFs permit, full ftile or tax declarafion to the land structure, including partially the cost of restoring the remaining affected and or those who are covered by structure, as determined the remaining by the concemed appraisal Affected structure - Php 41,833 structures customary law (e.g., possessory committee with no 20 deduction for salvaged building Income loss 30,000 PAFs are still viable for rights, usufruct) or other acceptable continued use. materials. proof of ownership +As determined by Relocation n/a the RIC, PAPs will be entitled to Rehabilitation n/a transitional allowance to cover for their computed 3 PAFs 3 PAFs income loss during the demolition and reconstruction of their shops, but not to exceed a 1 month period. Renters (tenants of affected shops +As determined by the RIC, shop renters will be entitled to a transitional allowance to cover for their computed None income loss during the period that their business is interrupted Entire shop affected OR Owner of structure with or without +Compensation incash for the when the remaining full title entire structure at Commercial - 17 PAFs or tax declaration to the land replacement cost as determined by the concemed structure becomes not or those who appraisal are covered by committee without deduction for salvaged building viable for continued customary law (e.g., possessory Affected structure - Php 778,135 materials. Income loss use, with or without a rights, usufruct) or other acceptable +Subsistence 244,800 building allowance of PhP15,000 to each PAP Relocation permit proof of ownership +Free transportation 700 will be provided if relocating Rehabilitation n/a +Rehabilitation assistance in the 17 PAFs 17 PAFs fom of skills training and other development actvities and equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage in a new income activity ______+Professional squatters will not receive compensation but they can collect their salvageable materials NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 26

Type of Loss Application Entitled Person Entitlement Compensation Amount (Php) Renters (tenants) of affected shops Given 3 month notice on the schedule of demolition +As deternined by the RIC, shop renters will be entitled None to a transitional allowance to cover for their computed income loss during the period that their business is interrupted, but not to exceed a 3 month period. +If shifting, either permanently or temporarily is required, shop renters are entitled to free transportation +Rehabilitation assistance in the form of skills training and other development activities and equivalent to PhP15,000 will be provided in coordination with other govemment agencies if the present means of livelihood is no longer viable and the PAP will have to engage S Other fixed assets in a new income activity. Loss of, or damage to, +Compensation or structures in cash for affected portion of the structure, Affected other structures: affected assets, partially including the cost of restoring the remaining structure, as Php 237,001 or entirely determined 23 PAFs by the concemed appraisal committee, with no depreciation nor deduction for salvaged building materials. 6 Electric and/or Loss of, or damage to, +Compensation in cash for affected water connection affected assets, portion of the structure, partially including the cost of or entirely restoring the remaining structure, as Affected utilities: determined by 1 PAFs the concemed appraisal committee, with no Php 8,441 depreciation nor deduction for salvaged building materials. 7 Loss of, or damage to, +Compensation Public facilities in cash at replacement cost to respective Affected Public facilities: public infrastructure agencies. (e.g., public water Php 294,099 22 PAFs tanks, tram lines, bus stop sheds, loading platform, public health center, barangay center, electric or telephone lines, etc.) 8 Trees/Perennials 3,810 trees owned by 412 PAFs Php - 332,725 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 27

Hence, there are only four distinct types of PAFs in relation to affected structures: marginally affected owners; marginally affected non-owners; severely affected owners; and severely affected non-owners. Additional entitlements depending on the attributes of the PAFs are provided for as outlined in the entitlement matrix in the LARR Policy.

Since the PAFs are thinly stretched along the entire segment, there will be no elaborate relocation scheme. Each severely affected PAF will have to individually workout their own relocation process using the proceeds of the compensation package that accrue to them as part of their entitlements.

5.5.5. Value of affected Perennials

As mentioned earlier, the value of perennials was estimated based on the current market prices as provided by the District Engineers Office, Department of Public Works and Highways.

All in all, about PhP 332,725.00 will be required to compensate for damages to trees and other perennials.

5.5.6 Compensation Matrix for Resident PAFs

Based on the LARR policy the compensation entitlements are summarized in Table 5.5.4. At this point it is deemed appropriate to outline the basic assumptions adopted to operationalize the entitlements provided for under the Policy.

5.5.6.1. Replacement Costs.

The affected structures were mainly categorized as residential, commercial, commercial/residential, public infrastructures, public utilities and other types of structures. The structures, based on the linear acquisition survey were evaluated as to whether the impact is severe or marginal following the guidelines in the LARR Policy and the appropriate cost entitlements were estimated using the replacement cost concept.

5.5.6.2. Land Improvements

In most cases, other valuable improvements within the home lot were also affected. These improvements were also valued to form part of the total compensation package for the PAFs. Valuation of other structures were done on the basis of the replacement costs concept and valuation of crop improvements were done on the basis of the current market value. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 28

5.5.6.3. Income Loss

In cases commercial structures, owners and tenants were entitled to a compensation of foregone income as a projected consequence of the implementation of the road improvement project. Income losses were determined as equivalent to the estimated average monthly gross sales of the commercial enterprise.

5.5.6.4. Relocation Allowance

Renters of severely affected structures were expected to be dislocated from their current dwellings. Hence, as provided for in the LARR policy, these PAFs were entitled to a relocation allowance equivalent to their respective monthly rental.

5.5.7. Compensation Package

Table 5.5.7 summarizes the compensation package for the PAFs based on the estent of impact, type of structures and the additional compensation entitlements. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 29

Table 5.5.7. Compensation package for resident PAFs by use of structure and other entitlements, RAP, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Particulars Extent of Impact Marginal Severe Total PAFs Amount PAFs Amount 1. Replacement Costs of Structures Residential 18 186,245 44 1,436,723 1,622,968 Commercial 3 41,833 17 778,135 819,968 Residential/Commercial 10 320,282 21 1,175,624 1,495,906 Sub Toial 31 -54S,360 82 -. 3,390,482 -3,93S,842.1

Public Infrastructures 2 30,595 20 263,504 294,099 Public Utilities 1 8,441 8,441 Others 7 60,291 16 176,710 237,001

Sub Toial . 9 90,886. . 37 448.655 539,541

2. Land Improvements 14 10,925 12 11,480 22,405

3. Income Loss 7 226,200 25 436,570 662,770

4. Relocation Allowance 2 700 700

5. Trees/Perennials 412/ 332,725 3,810 trees

SubTotal-- . . 237,125 _ __. 448,750 1,018,600.

TOTAL -. F. 876,371 4.287,887 5,496,983 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 30

5.5.8. RAP Implementation Cost

In addition to the compensation package to the PAFs, RAP implementation will entail overhead and logistical costs. This cost covers the management of the implementation process, honoraria to field personnel and committee members, maintenance and operating expenses and financial administration, among others. It is suggested here that the total implementation costs of the RAP be pegged at 10 percent of the total compensation to the PAFs. Hence, the implementation cost is projected at about PhP

5.5.9. Distribution of Total Compensation by Municipality

As a matter of policy, RAP implementation will be done by the DPWH District Engineers Office in collaboration with the local government units through the Municipal RAP Implementing Committee (MRIC). Hence, there is the need to outline the total compensation package by municipality.

5.5.9.1. Marginally Affected Structures

The total compensation package for 40 marginally affected structures is estimated at roughly PhP 639,246 (Table 5.5.10.1). This compensation package includes replacement costs to structures, crop improvements within the vicinity of the structure, and forgone eamings for structures used fully or partially for commercial purposes.

Table 5.5.10.1. Estimated compensation package for marginally affected structures by municipality, Surigao del None, 2001.

TMARVAL

Municipality USESTRUC Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total Residential n 3 9 6 18 Sum 10,783 110,297 65,165 186,245 Commercial n 1 1. 1 3 Sum 9,023 26,719 6,091 41,833 Commercial / Residential n 4 6 10 Sum 66,846 253,436 320,282 Public Infra n I 1 2 Sum 3,649 26,946 30,595 Others n 4 3 7 Sum 35,923 24,368 60,291 Total n 4 19 17 40 Sum 19,806 243,435 376,006 639,246 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 31

The bulk of the compensation accrues to the owners of marginally affected commercial or residential/commercial structures with a combined estimated costs of about PhP 360,000. The remaining cost estimate of about PhP280,000 is spread across the other uses including residential, public facilities and other structures.

By municipality, Claver and Gigaquit have the higher compensation packages estimated at about PhP 376,006 and PhP 243,435 respectively. The higher compensation for Claver is attributed to the damage to commercial cum residential structures estimated at PhP253,436.

5.5.9.2. Severely Affected Structures

There are about 119 severely affected structures with an estimated total entitlements of PhP 3,839,136 (Table 5.5.10.2). This package is spread across the three municipalities, by types of structures.

Table 5.5.10.2. Estimated compensation package for severely affected structures by municipality, Surigao del Norte, 2001.

TSEVAL

Municipality USESTRUC Bacuag Gigaquit Claver Total Residential n 2 19 23 44 Sum 12,246 620,852 803,625 1,436,723 Commercial n 2 8 7 17 Sum 71,621 416,063 290,450 778,135 Commercial / Residential n 3 6 12 21 Sum 141,683 462,245 571,696 1,175,624 Public Infra n 4 5 11 20

Sum 43,499 47,720 172,284 263,504 Public Utilities n 1 1 Sum 8,441 8,441 Others n 2 8 6 16 Sum 14,378 46,131 116,200 176,710 Total n 13 47 59 119 Sum 283,428 1,601,453 1,954,255 3,839,136 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 32

By municipality, Claver and Gigaquit for more than PhP3.5 Million of the total compensation package of about PhP3.8 Million. The remaining cost package of about PhP280,000 is allocated for PAFs in Bacuag.

Residential structures account for the highest compensation valued at about PhP1.4 Million. Residential cum commercial structures also account for a higher entitlement of roughly PhP1.1. Million.

5.5.10. Total RAP Cost

The following is the summary of the total estimated cost of the RAP including the cost of implementation:

Compensation Package

Marginal Effect on Structures PhP 639,246

Severe Effect on Structures PhP 3,839,137

Income Loss PhP 662,770

Relocation Allowance PhP 700

Land Improvements PhP 22,405

Affected Perrenials PhP 332,725

Sub-Total PhP 5,496,983

Contingencies

Allowance for Inflation (based on the 2000 rate for CARAGA @ 3.4) PhP 186,897

Estimation Error @ 5% 274,849

RAP Implementation @ 10 % PhP 548,698 of total Compensation

Sub-Total PhP 1,010,444

External Monitoring $ 2,000.00

As summarized, the total cost of the RAP is PhP 6,507,427 and $2,000.00 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 33

6. Implementation Schedule

The implementation of the RAP follows as soon as the World Bank concurs with the salient features of the RAP as endorsed by the GOP through DPWH/IBRD-PMO. After the approval of the RAP Report, implementation will be managed by the EIAPO with the supervision of the IBRD-PMO.

6.1. MOU and Establishment of Committees

Table 6 outlines the fundamental steps, procedures and schedule of the activities required for the implementation of the RAP. To set up the structural basis for the implementation of RAP, the institutionalization of the roles of the various stakeholders in the project will have to be operationalized. This can be done through the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the DPWH and the Local Government Units. The MOU will pave the way for the establishment of the various committees required for the implementation of RAP, namely; the municipal-based Resettlement Implementation Committee (RIC) and the Grievance Committee.

6.2. Training-Orientation on RAP Implementation

Because the concept and the process are relatively new even to the DPWH bureaucracy, there is need to orient the District Offices and the counterpart members of the Local Government Units (LGUs) on the RAP Implementation procedures.

Immediately following the formation of the MRIC, its members will be oriented on the work of the committee. Specifically, the MRIC members will be trained in RAP policies and implementation procedures

6.3. Validation of RAP Report

With the assumptions that the implementing mechanisms for the RAP at all levels has been established, then all the stakeholders can participate in the collaborative work of validating the RAP Report prepared by the consulting Firm. Validation will involve cross checking of the identified PAFs, the accuracy of the linear acquisition, and validation of entitlements and compensation.

6.4. Public Infornation Campaign

As soon as the validating team finds the RAP Report to be satisfactory or is in compliance with the standards set in the LARR Policy Framework, then a public information campaign can be launched to reiterate the existence of the project and to allow the PAFs to prepare the necessary supporting documents, if needed, for the compensation to be made possible. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 34

6.5. Finalization of the Compensation Package

Subject to modifications in response to changing price conditions, the compensation package will then be finalized to determine the amount to be paid for each individual PAF. Once completed, PAFs will be asked to fill up some forms to indicate their concurrence to the compensation package and to the terms and conditions of the compensation.

6.6. Public Meeting/Disclosure

In a public forum, PAFs will be made aware of their entitlements as a consequence of project disturbance. At this point in time, PAFS will also be informed of the schedule of payments and the schedule of civil works to allow the PAFs to prepare for their reorganization or relocation and to harvest any standing agricultural crops.

6.7. Cut-off Date

As provided for in the policy, only structures existing on or before March 13, 2001 will be entitled to the compensation package.

6.8. Payment

Payment will have to be done in a public place. Hence, the RIC should coordinate with the LGU officials to ensure that PAFs within their areas of jurisdiction are made aware of the schedules of payments.

6.9. Handing Over the Site for Civil Works

One month before the scheduled start of civil works, RAP implementation shall have been completed. This means that PAFs have been paid, reorganized or relocated, and all the stakeholders in the implementation process have performed their tasks in accordance to the DPWH Resettlement Policy. NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad 35

Table 6. RAP implementation schedule by activity, Surigao del Norte, 2002.

Activity Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. MOU & Establishment of Committees 2. Training/Orientation _ 3. Validation fI I I I 1 4 Public Information Campaign,i- 5. Finalization of Compensation Package _ 6. Public Hearing/Disclosure 7. Payment 8. Hand Over of Site _ _ _,

7. Monitoring and Evaluation

The underlying principle of the LARR Policy Framework, in general, and the RAP in particular, is to provide mitigating measures to at least ensure that the PAFs will not be worse off as a consequence of the road improvement project. It is for this reason that the survey instrument was designed to capture the critical aspects of the PAFs social and economic conditions to provide the benchmark for future assessments in the context of monitoring and evaluation.

The instrument was also designed to capture the salient attributes of the PAFs and their affected properties to ensure that the monitoring and evaluation team can validate as whether or not the determination of the entitlements and the estimation of compensations are along the principles outlined in the LARR Policy Framework.

The PAFs profile, the entitlements and the estimated compensation packages presented in the earlier sections are mere summaries of the raw data structured in a standard database format. Electronic copies of the database are provided for to facilitate the monitoring and evaluation of the RAP implementation and impact.

Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the RAP is designed to be conducted at two levels: internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by the Environmental and Social Services/EIAPO in collaboration with the Ditrict Offices, the local government units (LGUs) and the PAFs. DPWH will solicit the services of independent agencies such as research and academic institutions, or other qualified consulting firms to conduct the external monitoring and evaluation (EMA). NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

APPENDIX A

PUBLIC CONSULTATION NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

Annex A. Public Consultations

1. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road, DPWH-XIII Regional Office, Butuan City, Agusan del Sur, January 3, 2001

1.1 Attendance

Mr. Benedicto Pepito, Provincial Agent, Bislig Ms. Anastacia Salas, Engineer II, Bislig Ms. Evelyn Beray, Engineer II, Regional Office Ms. Ma. Theresa Diola, Computer Operator II, Regional Office Ms. Vilma Migrifio, Engineer II, Regional Office Mr. Samson Hebra, Engineer IV, Regional Office Mr. Roldan Pedrozo, Special Investigator, Tandag Ms. Criste Navida, Project Manager, EIAPO-DPWH Ms. Sol Abasa, Engineer III, EIAPO-DPWH Ms. Charlene Blando, Engineer III, EIAPO-DPWH Mr. Jun Castafieto, Katahira and Engineers International Ms. Razel Bautista, Katahira and Engineers International Dr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo, Katahira Consultant

1.2. Briefing on the National Roads Improvement and Management Program and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

Engr. Criste Navida, the Project Manager, presented an overview of the National Roads Improvement and Management Program (NRIMP) and its overall objectives. The principles of the Resettlement Policy were also discussed. Engr. Charlene Blando and Engr. Sol Abasa discussed the concept and process of.implementing the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP).

Also included in the discussion are the requirements of the project and its likely impacts. The implementing units of RAP and their respective duties were also briefly explained. Dr. Gordoncillo on the other hand, presented the tentative schedule of activities for the public consultation and provided the questionnaires to be used in the survey proper.

Al-I NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

1.3. Highlights/Issues Raised

The following are the issues/clarifications raised by the attendee during the orientation:

1.3.1 Settlement of claims for the compensation for lost assets of PAPs. Engr. Navida assured the attendees that the PAPs will be fairly compensated as mandated in the Administrative Order 50. Tapping assistance, in addition to zonal value + 10% will be provided to affected landowners of residential, commercial, or agricultural lands.

1.3.2. Responsibility of the district and regional offices in the actual payments for the PAPs. Engr. Navida reiterated that the funds will be released only upon the request of the District Engineering Office. The District Engineering Office, through the Regional Office, must comply with the requirements and submit to the Head Office the list of PAPs together with the approved vouchers. The funds will be released as soon as the Head Office receives the abovementioned requirements.

1.3.3. Cut-off date of the project for the affected areas. It was clarified in the orientation that the cut-off date is the date of commencement of the census of affected persons within the project's area boundaries. Those who are not covered in the census are not entitled to claim for any compensation.

1.3.4. Incentives for the DPWH staff to be involved in the project. Engr. Navida assured the group that monetary incentives will be given to the DPWH staff who will be involved in the RAP implementation.

A1-2 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

2. Orientation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road DPWH, Surigao City, Surigao del Norte January 4, 2001

1. Attendance

Mr. Romeo Abao, District Engineer Mr. Policarpio Origenes, Assistant District Engineer Mr. Apolinario Larong Sr. Engineer III Ms. Gina Soriano, Engineer II Ms. Ma. Theresa Diola, Computer Operator II, Reg'l Office Ms. Evelyn Beray, Engr. II, Reg'l Office Ms. Criste Navida, EIAPO Ms. Sol Abasa, EIAPO Ms. Charlene Blando, EIAPO Mr. Jun Castafiero, Katahira and Engineers International Ms. Razel Bautista, Katahira and Engineers International Dr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo, Katahira Consultant

II. Briefing on the National Roads Improvement and Management Program and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

Engr. Criste Navida, the Project Manager, presented an overview of the National Roads Improvement and Management Program (NRIMP) and its overall objectives. RAP, its concept and process of implementation were also discussed. Also included in the discussion are the requirements of the project and its likely impacts. The implementing units of RAP and their respective duties were also briefly explained. Dr. Gordoncillo on the other hand, presented the tentative schedule of activities for the public consultation and provided the questionnaires to be used in the survey proper.

III. Highlights/Issues Raised

1). Settlement of claims for the compensation for lost assets of PAPs. Engr. Navida assured the attendees that the PAPs will be fairly compensated as mandated in the Administrative Order 50. Tapping assistance, in addition to zonal value + 10% will be provided to affected landowners of residential, commercial, or agricultural lands.

2). Structure of the RAP implementing units. The prime movers of the RAP project were identified during the orientation. However, their distinguished duties and responsibilities as to the RAP implementation must be further clarified.

3). Incentives of the DPWH staff to be involved in the project. Engr. Navida assured the group that monetary incentives will be given to the DPWH staff who will be involved in the RAP implementation.

A1-3 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

3. Public Consultation on the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Surigao-Davao Coastal Road Gigaquit Municipal Hall, Surigao del Norte January 22, 2001

I. Attendance

Name Designation/Position Address

Danilo Orquina Mayor Bacuag Diosdado Acido Mayor Claver Domingo Perral Mayor Gigaquit Teofilo Llano Brgy. Captain San Antonio, Gigaquit Gorgonia Pusal Brgy. Captain San Isidro, Gigaquit Rodulfo Gesta Brgy. Captain Poniente, Gigaquit Antonio Mainit Sr. Brgy. Captain Panatan, Claver Joverto Degolto Brgy. Captain Urbiztondo, Claver Ricardo Bayeta Brgy. Captain Daywan, Claver Bartolome Gerulla Brgy. Captain Cabugo, Claver Segundino Polam Sr. Brgy. Captain Mahanub, Claver Pedro Paqueo Brgy. Captain Wonge, Claver Victoria Ata Brgy. Councilor San Isidro, Gigaquit Arceli Alburo Brgy. Councilor Cagdinao, Claver Carde dela Rama Brgy. Councilor Cagdinao, Claver Roberto Regulada Brgy. Councilor Cagdinao, Claver Jovencia Manlimos Brgy. Councilor Cabugo, Claver Oliver Tuyor Brgy. Councilor Ladgaron, Claver Marciano Basul Brgy. Councilor Tayaga, Claver Diola Napal Brgy. Councilor Daywan, Claver Antonio Cesarental Purok Chairman Urbiztondo, Claver Lilibeth Gumapac Day Care Worker San Antonio, Gigaquit Maucinita Tupal Brgy. Treasurer Poniente, Gigaquit Pascasio Lacre Resident Mahanub, Claver Ibar Tac-an Resident Urbiztondo, Claver Sulmesita Mula-an Resident Urbiztondo, Claver Fenlie Balberia Resident Urbiztondo, Claver James Bedrano Resident Urbiztondo, Claver NP Paqueo Municipal Engineer Claver Alyn Silagan Municipal Engineer Bacuag TR Paqueo, VII Municipal Engineer. Claver Leopoldo Vega Engr. III Chief PDS DPWH, Tandag Gina Soriano Engr. II DPWH, Tandag Claudio Comia Spl. Agent I DPWH, Tandag Remegio Comia Clerk II DPWH, Tandag Jose Beniga DILG Bacuag Sol Abasa Engineer III EIAPO-Manila

A1-4 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

Dr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo Katahira Consultant Manila Jun Castafieto Katahira Consultant Manila Evelyn Beray Engr. II DPWH-XIII Roldan Pedroso Spl. Investigator DPWH-Tandag Jay Laurente Engineering Assistant DPWH-Tandag Julius Trinidad Engineering Assistant DPWH-Tandag Mena Escalona Katahira Consultant Manila Razel Bautista Katahira Consultant Manila

11. Consultation Proper

Part of the process to finalize the draft Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is to conduct a public consultation where public officials and the affected population meet and discuss the project and its likely impacts. This was done to ensure that the community understands the nature and extent of the project. A consultation implies sharing of ideas, which help in better understanding of the issues arising in the said activity. Such gatherings help disseminate information from project officials to the affected population. It provides accurate information to the affected population and also dispels fears and misconception, thus providing the foundation for collaboration between the affected population and the project officials.

One week before the scheduled date for public consultation, letters of notice were sent to the mayors of the municipalities within the project's boundaries, informing them of the public consultation to be conducted by the Katahira Consultant and the Engineers from the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). The letters were also faxed to the District Engineers in Tandag and Surigao City. Due to some hitch in communication, the letter was not able to reach the office of the District Engineer in Surigao City. They were only informed by the consultant upon his arrival in the province.

Dr. Prudenciano Gordoncillo, Katahira consultant, facilitated the public consultation. He presented the project including its overall objectives and merits. The concept, as well as the process of implementing the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) was also briefly explained. The roles and responsibilities of the DPWH, the LGUs and the Community were further identified during the consultation. The public was also informed of the schedule of the socio-economic survey in their respective municipalities.

III. Highlights/Issues Raised

1). Claims for the compensation for lost assets of PAPs. The consultant assured the public that all PAPs residing in, doing business, cultivating land, have rights over resources within the project area will be eligible for compensation for lost assets. PAPs who own private lands must show title, tax declaration or any proof to show ownership of the lands. Public physical infrastructure such as waiting sheds, electric posts, water pipes, irrigation system, etc., which will be affected by the project are

Al-5 NRIMP-RAP: Bacuag-Gigaquit-ClaverRoad

entitled for compensation. It was also cleared in the consultation that the PAPs who lives within the road right of way will be compensated only for the affected structures and not for the land. The DPWH will be responsible for the payments for the lost assets.

2). Scope of the project's road construction. Dr. Gordoncillo clarified that the road construction will affect the provinces of Surigao del Norte, Surigao del Sur, Agusan del Sur and Davao Oriental. For Surigao del Norte, the road construction includes 12 km from Bacuag boundary to Claver. The road project will improve and rehabilitate gravel roads and convert it to Portland Cement pavement. Existing roads that needs repair will also be rehabilitated. Deteriorating bridges will also be replaced and drainages will also be put in place.

3). Concreting of roads in Brgy. Urbiztondo, Claver. The Brgy. Captain of Urbiztondo, Claver suggested for a re-route since there would be many structures that will be affected in the area including a school fence. Engr. Sol Abasa from DPWH head office however, told the Brgy. Captain that they will first look into the design made by Katahira Engineers. However, she reiterated that still, the Katahira Engineers will have the final decision when it comes to the road design.

4). Assistance from the LGUs. The consultant urged the Mayor and Brgy. Captains of Gigaquit, Bacuag and Claver to orient their barangay members regarding the project ahnd the socio-economic survey to be conducted by the project team. Such orientation will facilitate the data-gathering process and ensure the quality of data provided by the community.

AI-6 APPENDIX B

LIST OF PAFs Appendix B. Case Summaries: Ust of PAF's Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Surname Given Name Location Barangay Severity of

1 Planas Marcelo 1166+080 Campo S 2 Calumpusan Jormy 1166+400 Campo S 3 Verana Culita 1168+989 Poniente S 4 Bayang Cresencia 1169+142 Poniente S 5 Panilag Editha 1169+262 Poniente S 6 Nuez Elena 1169+318 Poniente S 7 Bausing Felicisino 1169+406 Poniente S 8 Acabo Romeo 1169+420 Poniente S 9 Tutor Daminao 1169+770 Poniente S 10 Dumo Roldan 1170+680 San Antonio S 11 Dalagan Samuel 1170+720 San Antonio S 12 Guzon Cecilia 1170+750 San Antonio S 13 Pesito Rodolfo, Jr. 11172+320 San Isidro S 14 Napana Carolina 11172+562 San Isidro S 15 Basola Ricardo 1172+586 San Isidro S 16 Elidia Teodorico 1172+593 San Isidro S 17 Absentee 1172+593 San Isidro S 18 Susasilo Mary Rose 1172+595 San Isidro S 19 Bano Henry 1172+660 San Isidro S 20 Ata Victorianoa 1172+760 San Isidro S 21 Libong Gregorio 1173+440 San Isidro S 22 Saldo Riza 1176+280 San Juan S 23 Dedumo Jr. Martin 1176+840 Daywan S 24 Cuariz Porferio 1178+030 Ladragon S 25 Galagala Rolando 1178+280 Ladragon S 26 Galleon Maximino 1181+480 Panatao S 27 Cagasan Vivencia 1181+490 Panatao S 28 Bagutsay Marcela 1183+192 Wangke S 29 Sumaylo Maricel 1184+720 Cabugo S 30 Guihapon Emelita 1186+855 Urbiztondo S 31 Consigna Anasario, Sr. 1187+280 Urbiztondo S 32 Caliwatan Felipe 1187+300 Urbiztondo S 33 Calabtan Avella 1187+340 Urbiztondo S 34 Diyaluha Elpidio 1187+370 Urbiztondo S 35 Tac-an Ivan 1187+380 Urbiztondo M 36 Betanio FE 1187+470 Urbiztondo S 37 Dagasgas Minelo 1187+500 Urbiztondo S 38 Mulaan Prudencio, Sr. 1187+510 Urbiztondo S 39 Mulaan Prudencio 1187+512 Urbiztondo S 40 Precilda Cresencia 1187+585 Urbiztondo M 41 Buaga Poblia 1187+590 Urbiztondo M 42 Japitan Mario 1191+724 Taganito S 43 Rusiana Emmanuel 1191+920 Taganito S 44 Parpan Alfredo 1192+000 Taganito S 45 Galeon Emilia 1162+380 Pobladon M 46 Iligan Emilyn 1166+160 Campo M

B-I Appendix B. Case Summaries: List of PAF's Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Surname Given Name Location Barangay Severity of

47 Iligan Emilyn 1166+160 Campo M 48 Parba Felicisimo 1168+820 Poniente M 49 Peligrino Felipa 1170+745 San Antonio M 50 Caga Romulo 1172+582 San Isidro M 51 Picatose Rogelio 1172+600 San Isidro M 52 Pinggal Glicerio 1172+612 San Isidro M 53 Lulab Bemath 1172+665 San Isidro M 54 Sistona Gerrarda 1173+120 San Isidro M 55 Lusdoc Maria 1173+420 San Isidro M 56 Lauro Hermogenes 1175+500 San Isidro M 57 Sumaylo Pampila 1175+950 San Juan S 58 Samontina Wilia 1180+530 Panatao M 59 Vicente Juanita 1183+210 Wangke M 60 Guihapon Emelita 1186+855 Urbiztondo S 61 Consigna Rosalina 1186+878 Urbiztondo M 62 Guihapon Sinona 1191+930 Taganito M 63 Cagampang Rowena 1165+900 Campo S 64 Geneta Arlene 1166+180 San Isidro S 65 Veyra Jeffrey 1172+614 San Isidro S 66 Libaste Melito 1172+620 San Isidro S 67 Lulab Bernath 1172+665 San Isidro S 68 Abandoned 1172+800 San Isidro S 69 Dumas Emily 1172+840 San Isidro S 70 Galinato Simplicia 1173+135 San Isidro S 71 Caueda Eliza 1173+434 San Isidro S 72 Avisado Marilen 1173+446 San Isidro S 73 Simborio Esmaelita 1176+965 Daywan S 74 Apad Romeo 1177+820 Ladgaron S 75 Verano Vicente 1179+100 Ladgaron S 76 Verano Vicente 1179+100 Ladgaron S 77 Patan Lucia 1184+320 Cabugo S 78 Manlimos Religioso 1184+788 Cabugo S 79 Tac-an Ivan 1187+400 Urbiztondo S 80 Gabas Fernando 1166+438 Campo M 81 Tiu Jean 1172+650 San Isidro M 82 Galds Narciso 1178+180 Ladragon M 83 Tino Narciso 1166+085 Campo 5 84 Bano Segundina 1166+653 Campo S 85 Bayang Jose 1169+260 Poniente S 86 Suarez Florife 1170+720 San Antonio S 87 Lumor Teodora 1171+360 Mahanub S 88 Veyra Rosalia 1172+620 San Isidro S 89 Eraso Felisedario 1172+950 San Isidro S 90 Eufenia Marionito 1172+995 San Isidro S 91 Quiri-Quiri Juanito 1178+120 Ladgaron S 92 Naiiial Virginia -S 1180+581 Panatao

B- 2 Appendix B. Case Summaries: List of PAF's Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Surname Given Name Location Barangay Severity of

93 Lamanilao William 1184+330 Wangke S 94 Lopez Emilia 1184+360 Cabugo S 95 Manlimos Teresita 1184+770 Cabugo S 96 Gades Enrique 1186+095 Campo S 97 Rabadan Rufina 1186+882 Urbiztondo S 98 Rabadan Rufina 1186+882 Urbiztondo S 99 Balberia Robert 1187+300 Urbiztondo S 100 Cayumo Gregoria 1887+310 Urbiztondo S 101 Cuarental Antonio, Sr. 1887+310 Urbiztondo S 102 Gonzales Nora 1191+650 Taganito S 103 Galigao Julie 1192+040 Taganito M 104 Asilo Alberto 1168+923 Poniente M 105 Tupal Marianita 1169+380 Poniente M 106 Yabo Jovita 1172+175 San Isidro M 107 Cairon Irene 1172+605 San Isidro M 108 Mainit Antonio, Jr. 1179+090 Ladragon M 109 Precilda Maura 1183+080 Wange M 110 Arecto Marilyn 1184+310 Cabugo M 111 Mosquete Luz 1184+760 Cabugo M 112 Picate Nilda 1184+950 Cabugo M 113 Guihapon Sotera 1191+722 Taganito M 114 Purok Waiting Shed 1164+220 Poblacion S 115 Waiting Shed 1165+100 Campo S 116 Water pipe/faucet 1166+105 Campo M 117 Waiting Shed 1166+408 Campo S 118 Waiting Shed 1169+440 Poniente S 119 Purok Waiting Shed 1170+710 San Antonio S 120 Waiting Shed 1171+320 Mahanub S 121 Waiting Shed 1172+862 San Isidro S 122 Espinaricia Gavina 1173+640 San Isidro S 123 Purok Waiting Shed 1176+160 Daywan S 124 Purok Waiting Shed 1177+860 Ladragon S 125 Waiting Shed 1178+275 Ladragon S 126 Purok Waiting Shed 1183+495 Wangke S 127 Purok 3 WS 1184+792 Cabugo S 128 Waiting Shed 1186+720 Urbiztondo S 129 Purok Waiting Shed 1187+280 Urbiztondo S 130 Waiting Shed 1187+360 Urbiztondo S 131 Purok Waiting Shed 1191+713 Taganito S 132 Cagdanao School Fence 1197+250 Cagdianao S 133 Purok Waiting Shed 1197+295 Cagdianao S 134 Plant Box 1172+645 San Isidro S 135 Waiting Shed 1187+900 Urbiztondo S 136 Market Stall 1172+500 San Isidro S 137 Jamero Alejandro 1162+905 Poblacion S 138 Vargas Rosalina 1166+082 Campo S

B -3 Appendix B. Case Summaries: List of PAF's Surigao del Norte, 2001.

Surname Given Name Location Barangay Severity of

139 Pania Pilar 1168+950 Poniente S 140 Montajas Mansueta 1169+440 Poniente S 141 Pingal Felix 1172+793 San Isidro S 142 Wooden Fence 1172+890 San Isidro S 143 Eupefna Ninifreda 1172+910 San Isidro S 144 Binore Teodolo 1173+372 San Isidro S 145 Tapahan 1173+410 San Isidro S 146 Sulapas Rina 1173+645 San Isidro S 147 Olves Regina 1177+350 Daywan S 148 Fence 1178+340 Ladragon S 149 Jatulan Arsenia 1178+990 Ladragon S 150 Patan Carmen 1184+740 Cabugo S 151 Urbiztondo Pedro 1186+740 Urbiztondo S 152 Guihapon Victoria 1192+035 Taganito M 153 Bano Renato 1171+290 Mahanub S 154 Perral Domingo 1172+800 San Isidro M 155 Babia Elmer 1172+870 San Isidro M 156 Church Pathway 1173+230 San Isidro M 157 Sumarca Frency 1177+450 Ladragon M 158 Church Fence 1187+900 Urbiztondo S 159 Matugas Janet 1192+160 Taganito M

B-4 APPENDIX C

LIST OF PERENNIALS APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Bacuag Barangay: Poblacion I_I_I 1 Palamos, Ciriaco Banana 6 480.00 480.00 2 Cuares, Francisca Banana 8 640.00 754.00 ______M ahogany 2 114.00 ______3 Cuares, Rey John Banana 10 800.00 800.00 Mango (npl) 1 80.00 Cacao 3 360.00 4 Galido, Desiderio Banana 2 160.00 1,120.00 J.Fruit (np) 3 150.00 Coco (p) 3 270.00 C acao 2 100.00 5 Galleon, Banana 3 240.00 240.00 6 Pagapong, Nita Banana 2 160.00 210.00 Jackfruit (np) 1 50.00 ______7 Doranta, Delia Banana 5 400.00 460.00 Doranta, Delia ~~~~Atis 1 160.00 ______Coco 1 90.00 Coco(5yo) 2 100.00 Santol 1 120.00 J.Fruit (np) 1 120.00 Mango (npl) 1 80.00 8 Alaba, Necipuro Gemelina 6 342.00 2,429.00 Calamansi 4 480.00 Macopa 1 120.00 Coco 4 360.00 Banana 4 320.00 Coco 3 240.00 Mahogany 1 57.00 Coco 25 2,250.00 9 Orquina, Jaime Gemelina 2 114.00 2,414.00 Jackfruit 1 50.00 Coco 21 1,890.00 Gemelina 8 456.00 10 Jamero, Alejandro Mahogany 3 171.00 2,797.00 Jackfruit 1 120.00 Banana 2 160.00 Coco 1 90.00 11 Galleon Angel Coco 6 300.00 447.00 ______Gem elina 1 57.00 Coco 25 2,250.00 Guavano 1 120.00 12 Ladaga, Valmerio Mahogany 36 2,052.00 5,004.00 J.Fruit (np) 2 240.00 ______Gemelina. 6 342.00 13 Cuizon, Emerenciana Coco 5 450.00 930.00 ______Coco (5yo) 8 480.00 ______14 Ayoban, Remedios/Remegia, Borja Coco 5 450.00 930.00 Mango (npl) 2 480.00 J.Fruit 1 120.00 15 Sancha, Ambid Mango 1 240.00 1,010.00 Coco 1 90.00 Banana 7 560.00

Page 1 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Banana 11 880.00 16 Naldoza, Porferio Gemelina 1 57.00 1,027.00 Coco 1 90.00 Banana 22 1,540.00 17 Banluta, Gregorio Coco 12 720.00 2,374.00 Mahogany 1 57.00 Gemelina 1 57.00 18 Banluta, Iniego Bmanagnoa 3 240.00 960.00 19 Bernadino, Pablita Banana 1 80.00 80.00 20 Borja, Remegia Banana 5 400.00 580.00 20nCoco 2 180.00 21 Pagapong, Lito Banana (np)4 4 280.00 760.00 Banana 6 480.00 Banana 14 1,120.00 22 Besquira, Mariano Banana (np)4 4 280.00 1,700.00 Coco(5yo) 6 300.00 23 Tan, Jesus P. Banana 6 480.00 620.00 Banana (np)2 2 140.00 24 Paler, Jose Jr. Gemelina 16 912.00 912.00 25 Cusare, Johnny Banana 14 1,120.00 1,120.00 26 Ignalig, Alfreda Gemelina 8 456.00 456.00 27 Lawan, Pablito Gemelina 2 114.00 114.00 28 Galanda, Rufinp Banana 9 720.00 720.00 29 Tado, Amador Banana 20 1,600.00 1,600.00 30 Lauron, Isabel Banana 7 720.00 720.00 Gemelina 55 3,135.00 Coco 10 500.00 5,675.00 31 Desiderio, Salvacion Banana (np) 12 12 840.00 Banana 15 1,200.00 . - Banana (np) 12 960.00 32 Lagat, Ansel Mango (np) 1 50.00 1,010.00 33 Alaba, Sabeniano Banana 13. 1,040.00 1,040.00 34 Elicano, Luciano Banana 5 400.00 600.00 ______Coco 4 200.00 35 Romero, Aurora Banana 4 320.00 320.00 36 Florerosos, Rosario Banana 15 1,200.00 1,200.00 37 Galanida, Patok Banana 4 320.00 370.00 Galanida,Patol'~~~ Mango (np) 1 50.00 ______Banana 5 400.00 38 Galido, Amold Guavano 1 50.00 530.00 Mango (np) 1 80.00 39 Oval, Cenecio Coco 4 360.00 360.00 Subtotal 44,873.00

Page 2 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municaipality: Bacuag Barangay: Campo 40 Galos, Lily Avocado 1 120.00 280.00 Galos, Lily ~~~~~Banana 2 160.00 ______41 Bangcoya, Tessie Banana 5 400.00 400.00 42 Dubluis, Leopoldo Banana 4 320.00 320.00 43 Elacion, Toto Coconut 1 90.00 90.00 44 Alvina Jonald Banana 2 160.00 250.00 ______C oconut 1 90.00 ______45 Oval Cenecio Banana 16 800.00 800.00 Cocunot 2 180.00 46 Oval, Crecencio Banana 15 1,200.00 2,100.00

______M ango 3 720.00 47 Cuares, Maria Banana 4 320.00 320.00 48 Munoz, Tirso Banana 3 340.00 240.00 49 Cagampang, Cedronio Banana 4 320.00 320.00 50 Tantoy, Pedro Banana 9 720.00 720.00 51 Ocon, dominador BCaoncanat 5 400.00 760.00

52 Odchimar, diego Coconut 1 90.00 570.00 Mango 2 480.00 500 53 Aceda, Melguides Banana 10 800.00 920.00 A_eda, Melguides Atis 2 120.00 Coconut 1 90.00 54 Oval, Alberta Gemelina 1 57.00 307.00 Banana 2 160.00 55 Munoz, Toto Coconut 4 360.00 930.00 ______Gem elina 10 570.00 ______56 Virtudazo, Monica Banana 30 240.00 240.00 57 Sulomona, gloria Banana 5 400.00 850.00 Coconut 5 450.00 58 Odhoy, Camelo Coconut 1 90.00 90.00 59 Cagampang, Ines Banana 1 80.00 80.00 60 Vivar, Darwin Banana 1 80.0090 Coconut i _ 90.00 17.0 61 Oval, Roberto Banana 2 120.00 360.00 Coconut 3 270.00 Coconut (5yo) 1 50.00 62 Gedulla, tomas, Jr. Banana 10 800.00 1,480.00 Santol 1 120.00 Guavano 2 240.00 63 PBMA, Campo, Bacuag Cacao 4 480.00 560.00 ______Banana 1 80.00 64 Deguibo, Danilo Banana 15 1,040.00 1,040.00 65 Naldoza, Proferio Atis 1 60.00 174.00 Gemelina 2 114.00 66 Dolor, Emiliana Banana 16 1,280.00 1,280.00 67 Mira, Vicente Banana (p)14 14 840.00 2,120.00 ___ Banana (np) 16 16 1,280.00 _____ 68 Zartiga, Lali Banana 2 160.00 280.00 Cacao 1 120. 00

Page 3 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Atis 1 60.00 69 Ging-Ging, Eutegio Banana (p) 8 640.00 1,540.00 Banana (p) 14 840.00 Banana 11 880.00

70 Teorima, Ambrosio Jackfruit (p) 1 150.00 1,150.00 Jackfruit (np) 2 100.00 71 Esperon, Pedro Banana (p) 8 640.00 940.00 Banana (np) 5 300.00 Coconut 1 90.00 72 Deguibo, Arsenio Breadfruit 1 120.00 390.00 Banana 2 180.00 Subtotal 22,071.00

Page 4 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

JPAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municaipality: Giagaguit Barangay: Poniete 73 Senoren, Luisito Banana 8 640.00 640.00 74 Papaya, Florencio Bmanana 5 400.00 880.00 75 Bayang, Luis/Salili Banana 8 640.00 640.00 76 Salili, Maldo Jackfruit 1 120.00 120.00 77 Bayang, Cresencia Banana 1 80.00 80.00 78 Sumampong, Hermelita Banana 1 80.00 80.00 79 Bersabal, analyn Guavano 1 120.00 120.00 80 Verana, Coleta Jackfruit 1 120.00 120.00 81 Alcantara, Bibiana Cacaoa 1 120.00 360.00

82 Nautan, Virginia Banana 3 240.00 390.00 ______Jackfruit(np) 3 150.00 ______83 Asilo, Alberto Banana 5 400.00 520.00 Cacao 1 120.00 ______84 Alcantara Banana 11 880.00 970.00 coco 1 90.00 Banana 5 400.00 85 Topal, Florencio mango 1 240.00 690.00 Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 Jackfruit(np) 2 192.00 86 Pana, Pilar Atis 2 120.00 504.00 Starapple (np) 1 96.00 Avocado (np) 1 96.00 87 Galgo, Carlito Banana 1 80.00 80.00 mango 1 240.00 88 Beloy, Amy Cacao 1 240.00 1,050.00 Banana 6 480.00 Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 89 Nelida, Ireneo Orange 2 240.00 340.00 Santol (np) 1 50.00 90 Bayang, Cresencio Guavano 1 120.00 180.00 Atis ~ 1 _ 60.00 ______Banana 18 1,440.00 91 Gesta, Rodulfo B. Coco 1 90.00 1,530.00 Mango 2 480.00 Banana 8 640.00 92 Beberino, Paz Jackfruit 2 240.00 2,080.00 Cacao 3 360.00 Guavano 2 240.00 Calamansi 1 120.00 Banana 3 240.00 93 Tuyor, Damiano Calamansi 1 120.00 420.00 Atis 1 60.00 Subtotal 11,794.00

Page 5 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality Gigaguit Barangay: San Antonio Mango 1 240.00 94 Malda, Pablito Calamansi 1 120.00 410.00 Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 95 Legaspi, Justiniana Banana 2 160.00 160.00 96 Limbaga, Leopoldo Banana 1 80.00 80.00 Avocado 1 120.00 97 Napoco, constantina Banana 3 240.00 480.00 Calamansi 1 120.00 Didic ~~~~~~Banana 6 480.00 98 Malda, Didic Banana 6 480.00 960.00 99 Azumen, Claudio Banana 1 80.00 80.00 100 Dalagan, Rodulfo Banana 12 960.00 960.00 101 Nada, Jesus Banana 6 480.00 480.00 102 Molina, Regina Banana 3 240.00 240.00 103 Molina, Paquito Banana 3 240.00 240.00 104 Asumen, Policarpio Banana 1 80.00 80.00 Jackfruit (np) 1 96.00 105 Dumo, Rodantarapple 1 120.00 516.00 Mango 1 240.00 106 Etabis, Purification Starapple 2 240.00 480.00 Cacao 2 240.00 ______coconut 1 90.00 Santol 1 120.00 107 Salvador, Bonifacia Banana 1 80.00 770.00 Mango 1 240.00

______Orange 2 240.00 108 Imalay, Linda Banana 9 720.00 770.00 ______Coca (2ya) 1 50.00 109 Asumen, Jaime Banana 4 320.00 434.00 ______G em elina 2 114.00 ______110 Pepino, Victoria Banana 9 720.00 720.00 111 Jason, Matias Starapple 2 240.00 360.00 Cacao 1 120.00 ______Subtotal 8,220.00

Page 6 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

jPAP HHAlnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Gigaguit Barangay: San Isidro Santol 1 120.00 112 Cantila, Juana BCaoncaona 21 810.00 2,890.00 Bamboo 4 280.00 Banana 14 1,120.00 113 Lauro, Lito Cacao 2 240 00 1,780.00 Mango 1 240.00 114 Girtan, Bentoy Banana 2 160.00 160.00 115 Guhitia, Uto Banana 6 480.00 480.00 Coco 1 90.00 116 Valentin/Teodosia Larong Atis 1 120.00 1,010.00 Banana 10 800.00 117 Baquilo, Sabeniana Gemelina 3 171.00 291.00 ______C acao 1 120.00 _ _ _ _ _ 118 Laruga Banana 4 320.00 320.00 119 Eupena, Gullermo Starapple 1 120.00 120.00 120 Eupena, Nillo Banana 1 80.00 80.00 121 Bugahod, Cherilyn Jackfruit 1 120.00 200.00 ______Banana 1 _ 80.00 ______122 Tac-an, Grgorio Banana 8 640.00 740.00 ______Jackfruit 2 100.00 ______123 Tabacon. Clenio Bamboo 5 350.00 350.00 124 Larong, Consing Mahogany 2 114.00 114.00 Cacao 1 120.00 125 Elloren, Benito Santol 1 96.00 256.00 Atis 1 40.00 126 Nada, Letecia Banana 2 160.00 388.00 ______Gemelina 4 228.00 127 Aguilon, Clementino Banana 4 320.00 320.00 Banana 1 80.00 128 Velore, Anaclito Calamansi 2 240.00 440.00 Cacao 1 120.00 129 Venore, Teodulo CBacaoa 1 120.00 200.00 Banana 2 160.00 130 Dumangas, Crspin Cacaouit 1 120.00 450.00

I ______Calamansi 1 120.00 Coco 3 270.00 131 Heirs of Paray Banana 3 240.00 790.00 Bamboo 4 280.00 Coco 9 810.00 132 Galgo, Jesus Bamboo 2 140.00 1,190.00 Mango 1 240.00 133 Guinsisana, Feliciano Banana _ 80.00 80.00 134 Bano, Crisente Calaransi 1 120.00 240.00 Banana 4 320.00 135 Roluna, Teofisto Guavano 3 360.00 800.00 Avocado 1 120.00 136 Sistona, Gerarda Cacao 2 240.00 480.00

Page 7 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

137 Galos, Nemesia Banana 5 400.00 496.00 Calamansi 1 96.00 ______138 Losduc, Deosdidit Banana 2 160.00 160.00 139 Galgo, Alberto Banana 2 160.00 160.00 Banana 14 1,120.00 140 Maria, Losduc Cacao 9 1,080.00 2,410.00 Coconut 1 90.00 Guavano 1 120.00 141 Galeon, Eufracia Banana 2 160.00 160.00 Banana 3 240.00 142 Pinggal, Gonzala Mango 1 240.00 600.00 Guavano 1 120.00 143 Matildo, Adelo Banana 4 320.00 320.00 Mango 1 240.00 144 Egay, Carlos Guavano 1 96.00 606.00 Coconut 3 270.00 Cacao 1 120.00 145 Espin, Delandrino Guavano 4 480.00 780.00 Atis 3 180.00 146 Galolo, Samson Banana 2 160.00 280.00 Starapple 1 120.00 Cacao 1 120.00 Macopa 1 120.00 Guavano 2 192.00 147 Legaspi, Juanita Santol 1 96.00 1,068.00 Starapple 1 120.00 Coconut 2 180.00 Bango 1 240.00 148 Caga, William, Jr. Manaoa 1 240.00 320.00 Banana 1 80.00 149 Basul, Ricardo Coco(5yo) 1 50.00 250.00 Guavano 1 120.00 _ Starapple 2 240.00 150 Reambonaza, Nanette Balamansi 1 120.00 680.00 Mango 1 240.00 Mango 1 240.00 151 Eupena, Gregoria Starapple 2 160.00 760.00 _Guavano 2 240.00 152 Lulab, Bernadette Mango 1 240.00 240.00 153 Moleta, Edmund Banana 2 160.00 160.00 Mango 1 240.00 Banana 2 160.00 Cacao 4 480.00 154 Ata, Victoriana j.Fruit 1 120.00 1,300.00 Avocado 1 120.00 Atis 1 60.00 Calamansi 1 120.00 Coconut 2 180.00 155 Pecante, Enriquita Mango 1 240.00 620.00 Starapple _____ 1 120.00 Banana 1 80.00

Page 8 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

mango 2 480.(;_ Banana 2 160.00 156 Lebaste, Rolando Coconut 1 90.00 910.00 Atis 1 60.00 Guavano 1 120.00 157 Naraha, Roberto Coconut 3 270.00 570.00 ______COc(Syo) 6 300.00 Cacao I_ _ 120.00 158 Bano, Nelson Macopa 1 120.00 360.00 Guavano 1 120.00 Mango 1 240.00 159 Narada, Natividad Banana 2 160.00 490.00 Coconut 1 90.00 Mango 2 480.00 160 Guhitia, Urbana Coconut 1 90.00 666.00 Guavano 1 96.00 161 Garao, Anecito Guavano 2 240.00 240.00 Banana 1 80.00 162 Pedrasa, Roberto mango 1 240.00 370.00 Jackfruit 1 50.00 Mango(np) 1 80.00 163 Paray, Narcisa Banana 6 480.00 680.00 .______O range 1 120.00 Banana 4 320.00 Avocado 2 240.00 Cacao(np) 9 864.00 Cacao (p) 2 240.00 164 Pingal, Lecerio Orange 1 120.00 2,684.00 Jackfruit 2 240.00 mango 1 240.00 Atis 1 60.00 Guavano 3 360.00 Calamansi 1 120.00 Avocado 1 120.00 165 Pingal, Elesio Cacao i 120.00 600.00 Orange 1 120.00 Jackfruit 1 120.00 166 Galigao, Ronito Banana 4 320.00 320.00 167 Guiritan, Mamerto Banana 10 800.00 800.00 167 Guiritan, Mamerto Bamboo 3 210.00 210.00 Cacao 1 120.00 168 Delpa, Editha Jackfruit 1 120.00 320.00 Banana 1 80.00 Bamboo 2 140.00 169 Larong, Apolinario, Sr. T. Mango 4 960.00 4,100.00 Banana 36 2,880.00 Breadfruit 1 120.00 Coco 6 540.00 170 Delapa, Maximo Guavano 1 120.00 790.00 Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 171 Pecito, Martiniana Cacao 1 120.00 120.00 172 Espin, Melinda Calamansi 1 120.00 200.00

Page 9 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

173 Inaya, Pascacio Banana 1 80.00 80.00 174 Turaja, Lino Banana 2 160.00 160.00 175 Galigao, Diosdado Banana 5 400.00 520.00 ______O range 1 120.00 ______176 Guiritan, Elpidio Avocado 1 120.00 280.00 ______Banana 2 160.00 ______177 Napal, Crisanto Banana 2 160.00 160.00 178 Guiritan, Celso Banana 2 160.00 160.00 179 Sulapas, Glenn Banana 1 80.00 80.00 180 Veyra, Dodoy Bamboo 5 350.00 350.00 Banana 5 400.00 181 Eupena, Floro Starapple 1 120.00 640.00 Guavano 1 120.00 Banana 7 560.00 182 Larong, Josepita Bamboo 2 140.00 1,180.00 Banana 8 480.00 183 Napana, sofia Banana 8 640.00 720.00 ______M ango 1 80.00 Banana 20 1,600.00 184 Roman, Catholic church Mango 2 480.00 2,200.00 Cacao 1 120.00 Cacao 4 480.00 185 Eupena, Necito Guavano 1 120.00 800.00 Jackfruit ___1_ 120.00 Banana 1 80.00 Cacao 1 120.00 186 Eupena, Herminia Jackfruit 1 120.00 320.00 Banana 1 80.00 187 Latore, soledad Cacao 1 120.00 120.00 Banana 6 480.00 188 Heirs of Sistona Bamboo 4 280.00 940.00 _Coco 2 180.00 Subtotal 48,679.00

Page 10 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Gigaguit Barangay: Mahanub I Mango 1 240.00 189 Femadez, Feleciana Starapple 1 120.00 440.00 Banana 1 80.00 190 Jason, Alejandra Banana 7 560.00 560.00 191 Cabanda, Aldigonda Banana 8 640.00 640.00 192 Papelleras, Lucina G. Banana 2 160.00 160.00 193 Peruda, Manuel Banana 9 720.00 720.00 194 Lomor, Teodoro Banana 7 560.00 560.00 Calamansi 1 120.00 195 Galolo, Lucina Guavano 1 120.00 320.00 Mango 1 80.00 196 Amarille, Danilo Banana 6 480.00 570.00 Coconut 1 90.00 Guavano 4 480.00 197 Amarille, Lucio j.Fruit 2 100.00 1,060.00 Mango 2 480.00 198 Napana, Ricardo Banana 2 160.00 210.00 Coconut 1 50.00 Subtotal 5,240.00

Page 11 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Daywan 199 Tuazon, Henry Banana (p) 4 320.00 520.00 ______Banana (np) 4 200.00 ______200 Presilda, Arsenio Banana 6 480.00 600.00 ______t~arapple~ 1 120.00 ______Guavano 1 120.00 201 Espinosa Juan Calamansi 1 120.00 800.00 Macopa 2 240.00 Banana 4 320.00 202 Velaya, simeon Banana 4 320.00 320.00 203 Bagnol, Guillermo Banana 2 160.00 280.00 ______Santol 1 120.00 ______Banana 3 240.00 204 Velaya, Teodoro Starapple 1 120.00 600.00 Bre-adfruit 1 120.00 _Cacao 1 120.00 Mango 1 240.00 205 Beguna, Nicolas Jackfruit 5 480.00 1,330.00 Cacao 1 120.00 Coconut 7 490.00 Banana 7 560.00 206 Chato, Esperedion Jackfruit 2 240.00 1,160.00 Mango 1 120.00 Guavano 2 240.00 207 Baradillo, Pablo Mango 1 240.00 360.00 ______Starapple 1 120.00 ______208 Ocon, Feliciano Calamansi 1_ ' 120.00 216.00 ______O range 1 96.00 ______Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 Cacao 3 360.00 209 Bahigawan, Victor Jackfruit(p) 1 120.00 730.00 Macopa 1 120.00 Banana 1 80.00 Banana 1 80.00 210 Larase, Bonifacio Cacao 1 120.00 250.00 Santol 1 50.00

211 Gonzales, Alejandro Cacmnsi 1 120.00 210.00

212 Degulto, Abondo BCaocoanuat 1 280.00 370.00 Banana 2 160.00 213 Degulto, Lucia Jackfruit 2 240.00 640.00 Guavano 2 240.00 214 Andoy, Teoducio Banana 3 240.00 240.00 Banana 5 400.00 Mango 1 240.00 Starapple 1 120.00 215 Paranada, Encarnation Avocado 1 96.00 1,186.00 Coconut 1 90.00 Jackfruit 1 120.00 . ______M ango 1 120.00 216 Giritan, Cresenciana Banana 8 640.00 640.00 217 Ladrido, Lamberto Banana 3 240.00 480.00 Mango 1 240.00

Page 12 of 23 APPENDIX C UST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

218 Elder, Felipe Banana 10 800.00 800.00 219 Cariota, Benito Banana 10 800.00 800.00 220 Giritan, Felisa Banana 7 560.00 680.00 ______Guavano 1 120.00 ______221 Sanchez, Tereso Coconut 1 90.00 90.00 Mango 1 240.00 222 Sering, Samuel Coconut 3 270.00 630.00 Cacao 1 120.00 223 Nazi, Eufracia Banana 4 320.00 434.00 ______G emelina 2 1 14.00- 224 Cordova, Remedios Banana 5 400.00 400.00 225 Alegre, Sofia Banana 3 240.00 360.00 ______G uavano 1 120.00 ______226 Apalisis, Charlito Banana 4 320.00 440.00 ______Guavano 1 120.00 227 Alegre, Arsenio Santol 1 120.00 120.00 228 Nazi, Sisoy Mango 1 240.00 240.00 229 Galido, Anselmo Banana 2 160.00 160.00 230 Pamada, Encarnacion Banana 2 160.00 160.00 231 Larase, Paulina Banana 1 80.00 80.00 Coconut 9 810.00 232 Egay, Carlos Banana 25 2,000.00 3,290.00 Mango 2 480.00 233 Vallescas, Benito Banana 1 80.00 80.00 234 Guhita, Nonilona Mango 1 80.00 130.00 ______Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 1 0 0 235 Laresa, ruben Banana 6 480.00 720.00 ______Starapple 2 240.00 7 0 0 236 Crisaldo, Virgillio Coconuat 16 180.00 1,460.00 Coconut 1 90.00 237 Paque, Caridad Coconut 1 560.00 650.00 238 Acilo Maria Coconut 6 480.00 480.00 239 Layo, Juana Mango 1 240.00 240.00 Cacao 1 120.00 240 Guibao, Emma Guavano 1 120.00 290.00 Jackfruit 1 50.00 241 Paqueo, Teofanes, Jr. Banana 2 160.00 160.00 242 Catog, Ponciano Banana 10 800.00 800.00 243 Napoco, Andre Banana 7 560.00 560.00 244 Ladrido, Nelson Banana 4 320.00 320.00 245 Desoro, Guillerma Banana 3 240.00 240.00 246 Laurderes, Stella Banana 3 240.00 240.00 247 Pacito, Felisa Mango 1 240.00 240.00 Mango (p) 3 720.00 Mango (np) 1 120.00 248 Verano, Rudy Coconut 4 360.00 1,616.00 Banana 4 320.00 Santol 1 96.00 Banana 6 480.00 249 Sebrian, Doreteo Cacao 9 1,080.00 1,800.00 Mango 1 240.00 Mango 1 240.00 250 Comandante, Naning B. Coconut 1 90.00 650.00 Banana 4 320.00 1

Page 13 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Coconut 2 180.00 Mango 5 1,200.00 251 Seventh Day Advantist Macopa 1 120.00 1,740.00 Avocado 1 120.00 Santol 1 120.00 Mango 3 720.00 252 Crisaldo, Virgillio Banana 3 240.00 1,230.00 Coconut 3 270.00 Coconut 1 90.00 253 Napocor, Andre Mango 1 240.00 420.00 Banana 1 90.00 Mango 15 1,200.00 1,680.00 254 Bonite, Jose lBanana 15 1,200.00 1600 Subtotal 35,362.00

Page 14 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Cabugo Coco 13 1,170.00 Coco (yo) 18 900.00 255 Avelino, Rodrigo Banana 59 4,720.00 7,750.00 Mango (np) 3 720.00 Mango 3 240.00 Coco 4 360.00 256 Erazo, Juan Coco(yo) 11 550.00 2,670.00 Banana 21 1,680.00 2600 _Mango(np) 1 80.00 Banana 15 1,200.00 257 Erazo, Camilo Coco 2 180.00 1,734.00 Mango 1 240.00 Gemelina 2 114.00 258 Lopez, Eugenio Banana 5 400.00 400.00 Santol(np) 1 50.00 259 Alceran, Comelio Guavano(np) 1 50.00 220.00 Banana(np) 2 120.00 260 Dumadag, Salome Coco 1 90.00 90.00 261 Auceran, Teodocia Santol 1 120.00 360.00 ______M ango 1 240.00 3 0 0 Avocado (np) 1 50.00 Santol (np) 1 50.00 262 Iligan, Lydia Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 354.00 Gemelina 2 114.00 Coco 1 90.00 263 Magpayoc, Lydia Banana 1 80.00 80.00 264 Lambus, Pedro Banana 2 160.00 400.00 Starapple 1 120.00 265 Nasayao, Nonito Coca 2 180.00 410.00 Jackfruit 1 50.00 Atis i 60.00 Macopa 1 50.00 Banana 1 60.00 266 Buca, Teofilo Mango 1 80.00 297.00 Cacao 1 50.00 Gemelina i 57.00 267 Pejo, Felisa Coco 2 6000 240.00 Banana (np) i __ 60.00 268 Degolto, Nenencia Starapple 1 120.00 ______M ango i __ 240.00 3 0 0 269 Mendoza, domingo Mango 1 240.00 240.00 Banana (np) 1 60.00 270 Pejo, Alvina Coco 13 1,170.00 1,780.00

______Coco 11 550.00 271 Vicente, Leonora Santol 1 120.00 120.00 Gemelina 1 57.00 272 Manlimos, Relioso Banana 7 560.00 1,397.00 Coco 7 630.00 Coco (np) 3 150.00 273 Ranioso, Jacinto Coco 9 810.00 1,210.00 aCoco(np)158o 400.00

Page 15 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Coco 15 1,350.00 274 Gedi, Cocordia Coco(np) 10 500.00 2,570.00 Banana 9 720.00 Coco 23 2,070.00 275 Gasulas, Florencio P. Mango 1 240.00 2,790.00 Banana 6 480.00 276 Pecate, Nicanor Guavano 1 120.00 120.00 277 Digol, Antonio Banana 2 160.00 160.00 278 Nautan, Sulina Banana 1 80.00 80.00 279 Bernales, Teofilo Coco 10 900.00 900.00 280 Bernales, Roger Banana 3 240.00 240.00 281 Yamit, Adela Gemelina 1 57.00 57.00 282 Pecate, Renerio Gemelina 4 228.00 228.00 283 Pejo, Jeffrey Banana 9 720.00 990.00 ______C oc a 3 270.00 ______284 Dagasdas, Pedro Coco 1 90.00 90.00 285 Nasayao, Maria Avocado 1 120.00 120.00 286 Geda, Abundio Banana 3 240.00 360.00 Orange 1 120.00 ______287 Sanchez, Eugene Banana 2 160.00 160.00 288 Opalia, Lucresia Coco 27 2,430.00 2,430.00 Banana 17 1,360.00 289 Pejo, Herculando Coco 15 1,350.00 3,190.00 Mango 2 480.00 Banana 7 560.00 290 Mira, Ires Coco 9 810.00 1,520.00 Coco (np) 3 150.00 Subtotal 36,117.00

Page 16 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Wangke Jackfruit 1 120.00 291 Naldoza, Reynalda Orange 1 120.00 410.00 Avocado(np) 1 50.00 Guavano 1 120.00 292 Dialoja, Panfilo Banana 8 640.00 640.00 Coco 1 90.00 Avocado(np) 1 50.00 293 Begonia, Hermeggildo Macopa 1 120.00 670.00 Santol 2 240.00 Orange 1 120.00 ______Jackfruit (np) 1 50.00 294 Sumalyo, Mansuete Banana 3 240.00 240.00 Banana 3 240.00 295 Bagotsay, Marcela Starapple 1 120.00 410.00 .______Santol (np) 1 50.00 296 Gerida, Teodora Banana 8 640.00 640.00 297 Acido, Ester Coco 1 90.00 90.00 298 Lamanilao, Juan MaCnoo 32 720.00 3,600.00 299 Sabalbaro, Expedita/ Bamboo 2 140.00 140.00 Breadfruit 1 120.00 300 Escalada, Reynaldo Mango 1 240.00 1,170.00 Coco 9 810.00 Coco 43 3,870.00 Mango 9 2,160.00 Santol 3 360.00 301 Paqueno, Pedro Santol (np) 1 50.00 10,290.00 Banana 3 240.00 Cacao 1 120.00 Bamboo 1 70.00 Gemelina 60 3,420.00 302 Chua, roberto Bamboo 6 350.00 530.00 Coca 2 180.00 ______303 Presilda, Eugenia Coca 18 1,620.00 1,970.00 Coco (yo) 7 350.00 ______304 Paqueno, Valentina Bamboo 12 940.00 930.00 Coco 30 2,700.00 480.00 3,930.00 305 Paque, PaulinaPaque, Paulina ~~~BananaMango 12 80.00 Coco (yo) 11 550.00 Guavano 1 120.00 306 Obedencio, dioesia Santol (np) 1 50.00 290.00 Calamansi 1 120.00 307 Peid,JreJackfruit 1 120.00 600.00 307 Presilda,Jorge Mango 2 0480.00 Subtotal 26,550.00

Page 17 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Baran ay: Panatao _ 308 Gonzaga, Ricardo Banana 2 160.00 160.00 Starapple 1 120.00 309 Sumalyo, Esmeralda Cacao 4 480.00 840.00 Mango 1 240.00 310 Gonzaga, Pablito Banana 7 560.00 560.00 Banana 2 160.00 311 Pagueo, Rodulfo Mango 1 240.00 2,380.00 Coco 22 1,980.00 312 Bayang, Marcelina/ Mango 3 720.00 720.00 313 Elimanco, Zacarias aocnoana 27 240.00 2,670.00

314 Sulapas, Carmelito/Jose Banana 18 1,440.00 1,680.00 Mangqo 1 240.00 315 Debulos, Barbara Coco 26 2,340.00 2,340.00 316 Marlique, Shirley Mango 1 240.00 320.00 Banana 1 80.00 ______317 Almansa, Vilma Banana 5 400.00 480.00 F~~im~flSd,VIiIIId Mango 1 80.00 318 Patan, Paulino Mango 1 240.00 240.00 319 Escalada, Raymundo Coco 7 630.00 950.00 Banana 4 320.00 320 Verano, Vicente Coco 11 990.00 1,550.00 ______Banana 7 560.00 ______321 Najjal, Virginia Banana 1 80.00 80.00 322 Laroga, Sergio Banana 13 1,040.00 1,040.00 Banana 20 1,600.00 323 Sulapas, Ernesto Coco 3 270.00 1,870.00 324 Go, Jose Pepe/Sumaylo Mango 2 480.00 480.00 325 Es,eralda Coco 3 270.00 270.00 326 Ruaya, FederiCoc Banana 3 240.00 420.00

Subtotal 19,050.00

Page 18 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Anstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Ladgaron Banana 1 80.00 327 Patan, Armando Atis 1 60.00 310.00 Orange 1 120.00 328 Andoy, Ricardo Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 170.00 Gemelina 2 114.00 329 Quire, Cirilo Jackfruit(np) 1 50.00 244.00 Mango 1 80.00 Banana 6 480.00 Banana(np) 4 240.00 330 Paglinawan, Syvia Atis 4 240.00 1,320.00 Mango 1 240.00 Cacao 1 120.00 331 Origenes, Vicente Starapple 1 120.00 120.00 332 Galanida, Rogelio Guavano 1 120.00 120.00 333 Patan, Berto Coco 2 180.00 340.00 Patan, Berto ~~~~Banana 2 160.00 ______Atis 1 60.00 334 Sulapas, Esteban Banana 4 320.00 620.00 . ______Cacao 2 240.00 Banana 4 320.00 335 Galagala, Rogelio Mango 1 240.00 660.00 Jackfruit(np) 2 100.00 336 Paglinawan, Ernesto Banana 7 560.00 610.00 Santol(np) i __ 50.00 337 Galagala, Lea Cacao i 120.00 180.00 Galagala,Lea M~~~As i __ 60.00 Starapple 3 360.00 338 Bronilda, Carol Coco (yo) 2 100.00 620.00 Mango(np) 2 160.00 339 a l i n a to , C o r n el ip G Gemelina 10 570.00 Galinato, Cornel;o ~Starapple(np) 1 50.00 ______340 Galos, Dionisio Banana 2 160.00 400.00 ~~o.su~~Dionislo ~Mango 1 240.00 341 Galagala, Adela Banana 3 240.00 240.00 342 Galgo, Feliciano Banana 2 160.00 160.00

343 r,..~~~~ia ~~~Cacao 1 120.00 100 343 Galindos, Rosita Atis(np) 1 40.00 160.00 Banana 1 80.00 Avocado 1 120.00 344 Dingding, Felicitas Avocado(np) 1 50.00 540.00 Starapple 1 120.00 Starapple(np) 1 50.00 Guavano 1 120.00 345 Sulapas, Anaclito Banana 3 240.00 240.00 346 Galos, Carlito Banana 1 80.00 80.00 347 Galgo, Sofronio Banana 2 160.00 400.00 ~..2cZIYU,QUIIUIIIU Mango 1 f240.00 Subtotal 8,154.00

Page 19 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HHlnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Cagdianao Coco 1 90.00 348 Molinar Tornting Avocado (np) 1 50.00 220.00 Banana 1 80.00 349 Ligtas, Fe Mango 1 240.00 240.00 350 Legaspi, rodrigo Banana 5 400.00 400.00 351 Urbiztondo, Percibal Coco 3 270.00 910.00 Banana 8 640.00 ______352 Nabale, Luis Banana 4 320.00 320.00 353 Guhita, Florante Banana 3 240.00 240.00 354 Urbiztondo, Astero Coco 10 900.00 160 ______Banana 2 160.00 ______355 Uncuna, David Coco 5 450.00 450.00 356 Genaro Banana 4 320.00 320.00 Jackfruit 1 120.00 357 Arguilles, Geronimo, Jr. Banana 02 800.00 1,320.00 ______B anango 1 240.00 ______Mango 1 240.00 358 Escanilla, Maring Banana(np) 3 180.00 260.00

359 Caliwatan, Mecedonio Banana 5 400.00 450.00 ______C oco(np) 1 50.00 ______360 Usondra, Mario Banana(np) 2 120.00 120.00 361 Ebol, Alfredo Jackfruit 1 120.00 210.00 Coco 1 90.00 Subtotal 6,520.00

Page 20 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/Institution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Tagnito 362 Matugas, Janeth Banana 1 80.00 80.00 363 Galigao, Julieta Avocado 1 120.00 120.00 Banana 7 560.00 Coco 8 720.00 Coco(yo) 5 250.00 364 Guihapon, sotera Coco 9 810.00 4,450.00 Coco(3-5 yo) 8 400.00 Coco 2 180.00 Coco 17 1,530.00 Banana 55 4,400.00 365 Guihapon, Nicolas Coco 7 630.00 5,770.00 Coca (3yo) 10 500.00 Cacao 2 240.00 Coco 10 900.00 366 Dagasdas, Maximo Banana 20 1,600.00 2,580.00 ______M ango (np) 1 80.00 367 Guihapon, Pureza Coco 2 180.00 180.00 368 Guihapon, Cenona Banana 4 320.00 320.00 Banana 21 1,680.00 369 Rusiana, Manuel Starapple 1 120.00 2,400.00 Mango 2 480.00 Guavano 1 120.00 370 Guihapon, Jovita Mango 2 480.00 600.00 Avocado 1 120.00 Subtotal 16,500.00

Page 21 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Municipality: Claver Barangay: Urbiztondo Mango 2 480.00 Banana 3 240.00 371 Gonzaga, Lillia Coco 33 2,970.00 4,110.00 Coco(5yo) 6 300.00 Orange 1 120.00

372 Opalia, Lucresia Macnogo 1 270.00 Banana 11 880.00

373 Nasayao, Guilermo Coco (np) 21 150.00 3,160.00 Mango 1 240.00 Coco 39 3,510.00 Mango 2 480.00

374 Urbiztondo, Franciso Gemoe(npa) 6 30000 5,080.00 Banana 2 160.00 Atis 1 60.00 Mango 1 240.00 375 Chua, Lolong Coco 6 540.00 920.00 Bamboo 2 140.00 Coco 13 1,170.00 376 Ebol, Silvestre Banana 37 2,960.00 4,370.00 Mango 1 240.00 377 Ebol, Silvestre Guavano 1 120.00 4,490.00 Coco 5 450.00 378 Pahinados, Lope BCancana 1 80.00 Mango 1 240.00 379 Gedi, Romeo Jackruit (np) 4 200.00 250.00 Gedi, Romeo ~~~~~Starapple(np) 1 50.00 ______Gemelina 1 57.00 380 Sela Pena, Leonora Banana 1 80.00 377.00 Mango 1 240.00 381 Patan, Marcelo Banana 6 480.00 560.00 381Marcelo Patan, ~~~Mango (np) 1 80.00 382 Ebol, Joventino Banana 3 240.00 240.00 Mango 1 240.00 300.00 383 Panatao, Marie Banana 1 60.00 384 Bisnar, Rogelio Banana 2 160.00 160.00 Banana 3 240.00 385 Allocod, Luisa Mango (np) 3 240.00 708.00 Gemelina 4 228.00

386 Bustriguez, Elisio BCancana 52 450.00 610.00 Mango 1 240.00 387 Toda, Leonardo Coco 1 90.00 410.00 Banana 1 80.00 Coco 3 270.00 388 Caliwatan, Sophia Jackfruit 120.00 510.00 Starapple 1 120.00

Page 22 of 23 APPENDIX C LIST OF PERENNIALS

PAP HH/lnstitution Species and No. Amount Total Amount

Coco 2 180.00 389 Rapas, Benito Banana 3 240.00 950.00 Mango 2 480.00 Avocado(np) 1 50.00 390 Rapas Coco 11 990.00 990.00 391 Vallejos, Ricardo Coca 9 810.00 1,370.00 ______Banana 7 560.00 ______392 Nasayao, Marivel Coco 1 90.00 490.00 ______3Banana 5 400.00 393 Betanio, Elido Mango 1 240.00 240.00 394 Rapas, Pastora Guavano 2 240.00 290.00 ______Jackfruit (np) 1 50.00 395 Dalubatan, Gonzalo Mango 1 240.00 240.00 Santol (np) 1 50.00 396 Ligaya, Demetrio Banana 2 160.00 350.00 Starapple 1 50.00 300 Coco 1 90.00 397 Mesias, agustin, Jr. Mango 1 240.00 360.00 Mesias,Jr. agustin, Cacao 1 120.00 ______398 Rapas, Manuel Coco 3 270.00 270.00 399 Cabdan, Felix Coco 1 90.00 90.00 400 Rapas, Teotimo Coca (yao) 14 700.00 1,020.00 ______Banana 4 32 0.0 401 Nasayao, florencio Mango 1 240.00 290.00 Coco (np) 1 50.00 402 Mulaan, Prodencio, Sr. Mango 1 240.00 330.00 ______C oc a 1 __ _ 90.00 403 Dagadas, Percilliano Mango 1 240.00 240.00 404 Rapas, Edilberto Mango 2 480.00 480.00 405 Mulaan, Solmerita Coco 1 90.00 90.00 406 Sumaylo, Saturnina Jackfruit 2 240.00 360.00 ______G uavano 1 120.00 ______407 Vallejos, quintin Banana 2 160.00 160.00 408 Espinol, Ernie Banana 1 80.00 80.00 409 Arquiles, Sophia Coco 5 450.00 600.00 Coca (Sya) 3 150.00 410 Raps, Benjamin Coco 34 3,060.00 3,060.00 411 Mesias, Augustin Coco 7 630.00 1,330.00 ______Coca (3yo) 14 1 700.00 412 Pulvera, Peling Coco 24 2,160.00 2,230.00 Bamboo 1 70.00 Subtotal 43,595.00 Grand Total [ 332,725.00

Page 23 of 23