DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Asia in October 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Asia in October 2019 Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 October 2019 in Central Asia was remembered by the selection of Chinese face recognition systems in the capitals of three countries, meetings of regional leaders within the CIS and the Turkic Council, toughening Internet censorship and active cooperation in the military sphere. The analytical platform CABAR.asia provides a brief overview of the most significant events of the region over the past month. Follow us on Facebook KAZAKHSTAN Tokayev on “Valdai” President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, took part in the plenary session of the XVI Annual meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club at the behest of the Russian leader Vladimir Putin. This year, a representative forum uniting authoritative politicians, famous experts and public figures from dozens of countries of the world, was devoted to a discussion of the role of the East in global geopolitics.[1] Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 Kassym-Jomart Tokayev took part in a meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club. Photo: akorda.kz The second president of Kazakhstan, Tokayev, takes part in the forum for the first time. However, the topic of East and Asia is close and well known to the head of state and international diplomat. In his speech, he spoke about the growing role of Asia, outlined the main challenges and problems, and made specific recommendations. In addition to the heads of Russia and Kazakhstan, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, King of Jordan Abdullah II and Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte had a speech at the plenary session.[2] In Kazakhstan, a scientist was sentenced to 10 years of prison on charges of treason A court in Almaty sentenced the Sinologist Konstantin Syroezhkin to 10 years in prison on charges of treason.[3] The 63-year-old Syroezhkin, who was identified as a citizen of Kazakhstan in a KNB report, was detained in February this year in connection with an investigation into the alleged leak of state secrets. Details of the case are not given in the committee’s one-sentence report. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), an American newspaper, wrote in their article (dated July 10) with reference to an informed source, that “Syroezhkin may have passed secret documents to China in exchange for a financial reward.” The publication notes that the Chinese authorities described the Syroezhkin case as “news concocted out of thin air.” WSJ drew attention to the fact that Syroezhkin was an adviser on China to the current president of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, back in the years when he worked as a prime minister. A native of Almaty, 63-year-old Konstantin Syroezhkin, was a graduate of the Higher School of the KGB (USSR), and was considered as one of the leading experts on China. He is the author of more than a thousand articles in Russian, English and Chinese. Since 2006, Syroezhkin worked as the chief scientific associate of the Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of Kazakhstan. The President of Kazakhstan did not like the new alphabet in Latin The Kazakh alphabet based on Latin graphics require improvements. This opinion was expressed on Twitter today, October 21, by the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.[4] “The historic decision on switching to Latin script was made about two years ago. However, Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 there are still flaws in the alphabet. Linguists need to refine the alphabet. I have given the relevant instruction to the Minister of Culture and Sports Aktoty Raimkulova. There is a lot of work ahead,” Tokayev wrote on his page. Историческое решение о переходе на латинскую графику было принято около двух лет назад. Однако в алфавите все же имеются недостатки. Языковедам необходимо усовершенствовать алфавит. Дал соответствующее поручение министру культуры и спорта А.Раимкуловой. Впереди большая работа. — Qasym-Jomart Toqayev (@TokayevKZ) October 21, 2019 On October 26, 2017, Nursultan Nazarbayev, president of Kazakhstan at that time, signed a decree on the translation of Kazakh language alphabet from Cyrillic to Latin script. The government was instructed to ensure a phased translation of the Kazakh language alphabet into the Latin alphabet until 2025. Tokayev banned the construction of the Kok-Zhailau resort Head of State Kassym-Jomart Tokayev once again spoke about the construction of a ski resort on Kok-Zhailau, which is located near Almaty.[5] At the meeting, as part of a working visit to Almaty, the President called plans for the construction of the resort as a problem. “In order not to return to this issue every time, today I forbid to engage in this project. That is, we do not need the construction of a ski resort on Kok-Zhailau,” said Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. “Moreover, all professional ecologists and the competent public are against it,” he added. Last spring, activists of Save the Kok-Zhailau group sent Tokayev a request to stop the construction of the ski resort and return this natural landmark to the Ile-Alatau National Park. Tokayev instructed to cancel the registration of foreign citizens in Kazakhstan In Kazakhstan, the mandatory registration of foreigners with the migration police should be abolished.[6] “If we really want to strengthen the investment and tourist attractiveness of the largest Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 cities and the country as a whole, we need to get rid of this anachronism as soon as possible. In addition to inconvenience for foreign guests, compulsory registration is a source of corruption. The very fact that foreign guests have passed border control is migratory registration. Why is digitalization being carried out, about which we discuss so much?” – said the President at a meeting in Almaty. He added that the government should resolve the issue before the new year. The Minister of Interior affairs, Yerlan Turgumbayev reported to the president that the agency was ready for this. Now, foreign citizens arriving to Kazakhstan (except for certain categories) are required to register in the internal affairs bodies within five days from the date of crossing the border. Tokayev expanded the powers of Nazarbayev The first president of Kazakhstan, the head of the Security Council, Nursultan Nazarbayev, received powers in the field of personnel policy, allowing him to control almost all major appointments in the republic.[7] The decree of the current president of the republic, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, dated October 9, is published in the legal information system of statutory and regulatory enactments.[8] According to the decree, the president will have power to appoint ministers, with exception of the heads of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Internal Affairs. These appointments may occur only after agreement with the head of the Security Council. The head of the council should agree on the appointments of heads of bodies directly subordinate and accountable to the president of Kazakhstan – the administration and management of the president, the Prosecutor General’s Office, the National Security Committee, the National Bank, the Republican Guard, the foreign intelligence service, the president’s security service, the Accounts Committee for monitoring the execution of the republican budget and anti-corruption agencies. Presidential spokesman Berik Kurmangali called the decree[9] “orderly” and dictated by the provision of the law “On Security Council”, which was adopted in 2018, even before Nazarbayev resigned. Grandson of Nazarbayev convicted in London for assaulting a policeman Aisultan Nazarbayev, 30-year-old grandson of the first president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 Nazarbayev, was sentenced to probation for assaulting a policeman in London.[10] The sentence involves a probationary period, continued treatment for drug addiction, community service and a fine. Nazarbayev was found guilty of the fact that, being under the influence of drugs, he resisted the police, hit and bit one of them. According to investigators, the policeman’s hand left a deep bite mark, and “blood flowed plentifully from the wound.” The sentence involves a trial period of one and a half years. If during this period he breaks the law, the sentence will become conditional. Tokaev instructed to establish a Chinese face recognition system in the capital President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev praised the method of digitizing personal data in China, saying that Kazakhstan should adopt the experience of Beijing.[11] This statement by Tokayev was made against the backdrop of increased anti-Chinese sentiment in Kazakhstan and US sanctions against Chinese companies for the production of video surveillance systems and digital technologies. The president praised Hikvision cameras, which can accurately recognize people’s faces, and instructed the government to work in this direction. Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 Tokayev at the office of Hikvision in Hangzhou in September 2019. Photo: akorda.kz The Hikvision company, which is included in the US sanctions list, has been supplying Kazakhstan cities with video surveillance cameras and security equipment for the last three to four years. So far, Hikvision cameras in Kazakhstan control only road safety. KYRGYZSTAN Atambayev’s advisor was sentenced to seven years in prison Ikramzhan Ilmiyanov, a former adviser to ex-president of Kyrgyzstan Almazbek Atambayev, was sentenced to seven years in prison, a fine of 160 thousand KGS ($ 2.3 thousand) and confiscation of property.[12] The court found Ilmiyanov guilty of receiving $ 150,000 from the Diesel complect company Month in Review: Central Asia in October 2019 for helping to end the criminal case of tax evasion. Ilmiyanov moved to the post of adviser to Atambayev from being his driver first, which caused sharp criticism from opponents of the head of state. In October 2018, Ilmiyanov was put on the wanted list; a few days later he was arrested.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mammadov Azerbaijan's Geopolitical Identity.Indd
    # 62 VALDAI PAPERS February 2017 www.valdaiclub.com AZERBAIJAN’S GEOPOLITICAL IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 21ST CENTURY CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS Farhad Mammadov About the author: Farhad Mammadov PhD in Philosophy, Director, Center for Strategic Studies under the President of Azerbaijan The views and opinions expressed in this Paper are those of the author and do not represent the views of the Valdai Discussion Club, unless explicitly stated otherwise. AZERBAIJAN’S GEOPOLITICAL IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 21ST CENTURY CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS The 21st century began with chaos in international relations, the growing multipolarity of the once unipolar world, and geographic determinism giving prominence to regional leaders, who are resisting unipolar projects and competing with each other in their geographical region. However, nation states have shown that they are still to be reckoned with. International organizations and transnational law enforcement agencies, which were created to fi ght transnational threats such as international terrorism, drug cartels and criminal organizations, have not increased their effi ciency. Nation states continue to shoulder the biggest burden of fi ghting the above threats. Globalization has stimulated integration and accelerated various global processes, but it has not made this world safer or more stable. The connection between national, regional and global security is growing stronger. The fact that transnational threats operate as a network has highlighted the importance of interaction between nation states in fi ghting these threats. But strained relations between the geopolitical power centers, contradictions between regional states and the revival of bloc mentality are hindering the civilized world from consolidating its resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's “Pivot to Asia”
    Russia’s “Pivot to Asia”: The Multilateral Dimension Stephen Blank STEPHEN BLANK is a Senior Fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council. He can be reached at <[email protected]>. NOTE: Sections of this working paper draw on Stephen Blank, “Russian Writers on the Decline of Russia in the Far East and the Rise of China,” Jamestown Foundation, Russia in Decline Project, September 13, 2016. Working Paper, June 28, 2017 – Stephen Blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper explores the opportunities and challenges that Russia has faced in its economic pivot to Asia and examines the potential roadblocks to its future integration with the region with special regard to multilateral Asian institutions. Main Argument Despite the challenges Russia faces, many Russian writers and officials continue to insist that the country is making visible strides forward in its so-called pivot to Asia. Russia’s ability to influence the many multilateral projects that pervade Asia from the Arctic to Southeast Asia and increase its role in them represents an “acid test” of whether or not proclamations of the correctness of Russian policy can stand up to scrutiny. Such scrutiny shows that Russia is failing to benefit from or participate in these projects. The one exception, the Eurasian Union, has become an economic disappointment to both Russia and its other members. Russia is actually steadily losing ground to China in the Arctic, Central Asia, and North Korea. Likewise, in Southeast Asia Moscow has promoted and signed many agreements with members of ASEAN, only to fail to implement them practically. Since Asia, as Moscow well knows, is the most dynamic sector of the global economy, this failure to reform at home and implement the developmental steps needed to compete in Asia can only presage negative geoeconomic and geopolitical consequences for Russia as it steadily becomes increasingly marginalized in the region despite its rhetoric and diplomatic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, China, and Usa in Central Asia.Indd
    VALDAI DISCUSSION CLUB REPORT www.valdaiclub.com RUSSIA, CHINA, AND USA IN CENTRAL ASIA: A BALANCE OF INTERESTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR COOPERATION Timofey Bordachev, Wan Qingsong, Andrew Small MOSCOW, SEPTEMBER 2016 Authors Timofey Bordachev Programme Director of the Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club, Director of the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies at the National Research University – Higher School of Economics, Ph.D. in Political Science Andrew Small Senior Transatlantic Fellow, Asia program, German Marshall Fund of the United States Wan Qingsong Research Fellow of the Center for Russian Studies (the National Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences under the Ministry of Education of PRC), School of Advanced International and Area Studies at East China Normal University; Research Fellow of the Center for Co-development with Neighboring Countries (University - Based Think Tank of Shanghai); holds a Doctorate in Political Science The authors express their gratitude for assistance in preparing the report and selection of reference materials to Kazakova Anastasia, Research Assistant, Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies at the National Research University – Higher School of Economics. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Valdai Discussion Club, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Contents Introduction: The Challenge of Central Asia .........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL PROBLEMS for GLOBAL GOVERNANCE Valdai Discussion Club Grantees Report
    Moscow, September 2014 valdaiclub.com GLOBAL PROBLEMS FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE Valdai Discussion Club Grantees Report Global Problems for Global Governance Valdai Discussion Club Grantees Report Moscow, September 2014 valdaiclub.com Authors This report was prepared within the framework of the Research Grants Alexander Konkov Program of the Foundation for (Russian Federation) Development and Support of the Valdai PhD in Political Science. Head of the Discussion Club. International Peer Review at the Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian The views and opinions of authors Federation, member of the Peer Сouncil at expressed herein do not necessarily state the Institute for Socio-Economic and Political or reflect those of the Valdai Discussion Research, visiting lecturer at the Moscow State Club, neither of any organizations University and at the Financial University the authors have been affiliated under the Government of the Russian with or may be affiliated in future. Federation, member of the board at the Russian Political Science Association The paper had been prepared by the authors before the outbreak Hovhannes Nikoghosyan of the Ukrainian crisis, and therefore (Armenia) the text of the report does not contain PhD in Political Science, visiting lecturer at any analysis of the events. the Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University (Yerevan), research fellow at the Information and Public Relations Centre under the Administration of the President of Armenia (2010-2012), visiting scholar at Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University (2012–2013) ISBN 978-5-906757-09-8 Contents 4 Introduction 8 Chapter 1. Russia in Global World 24 Chapter 2. Global Trends of Global Governance 24 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Inozemtsev, “Russia's Economic Modernization: the Causes of A
    Notes de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Visions 96 Russia’s Economic Modernization: The Causes of a Failure Vladislav INOZEMTSEV September 2016 Russia/NEI Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the few French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European and broader international debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-616-8 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2016 Cover: © Philippe Agaponov How to quote this document: Vladislav Inozemtsev, “Russia's Economic Modernization: The Causes of a Failure”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 96, September 2016. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Ifri-Bruxelles Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 1000 – Brussels – BELGIUM Tel.: +32 (0)2 238 51 10 – Fax : +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan).
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Nagorno Karabakh Conflict from Iran's Perspective
    INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY POLICY (ISP) WORKING PAPER THE 2020 NAGORNO - KARABAKH CONFLICT FROM IRAN’S PERSPECTIVE by Vali KALEJI Center for Strategic Studies (CSS) The COVID-19 pandemic: impact for the post-Soviet space and Russia’s aspirations VIENNA 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 II. CURRENT FLOW OF WAR IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH: SECURITY CONCERNS IN IRAN'S NORTHWESTERN BORDERS ................................................................................................................................. 5 III. IRAN SECURITY AND MILITARY REACTIONS .......................................................................................... 13 IV. IRAN’S DIPLOMATIC DYNAMISM ............................................................................................................. 17 V. ANALYZING IRAN’S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD THE 2020 NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT ....... 26 VI. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................. 29 1 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Vali Kaleji is an expert on Central Asia and Caucasian Studies in Tehran, Iran. His recent publications in Persian: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO): Goals, Functions and Perspectives (2010), South Caucasus as a Regional Security Complex, (2014), Political Developments in the Republic of Armenia, 1988- 2013 (2014), Iran, Russia and China in
    [Show full text]
  • Valdai Club Report the International Dimension of the Nagorno
    Valdai Discussion Club Report The Breakdown of the Status Quo and the International Dimension of the Nagorno-Karabakh Crisis Kerim Has, Vali Kaleji, Sergey Markedonov valdaiclub.com #valdaiclub December 2020 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Valdai Discussion Club, unless explicitly stated otherwise. ISBN 978-5-907318-18-2 © The Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club, 2020 42 Bolshaya Tatarskaya st., Moscow, 115184, Russia About the Authors Kerim Has Expert on International and Russia-Turkey Relations (Turkey) Vali Kaleji PhD in Regional Studies, Central Asia and Caucasian Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran and analyst at the Institute for Iranian and Eurasian Studies (IRAS) (Iran) Sergey Markedonov Leading Researcher at the Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University; Editor-in-Chief of the Journal “International Analytics” (Russia) Contents 3 The Internationalisation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Regional Confl ict 6 The Breakdown of the Old Status Quo: New Challenges 9 Turkey: Old Interests, New Role 12 Iran: A Policy of Careful Balance Iran’s position towards the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh confl ict Iran’s security and military reactions Iran diplomatic dynamisms 20 Georgia: Fragile Neutrality 22 Russia, the United States and France: Results of the Stress Test Moscow between Baku, Yerevan and Ankara US: Nagorno-Karabakh against the background of the election campaign France: the Mediterranean, European leadership and internal unity through the Nagorno-Karabakh prism Big deals or pragmatism? Potential scenarios The Breakdown of the Status Quo and the International Dimension of the Nagorno-Karabakh Crisis 3 The Internationalisation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Regional Confl ict An Armenian-Azerbaijani confrontation is nothing new in international politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Foreign Policy: the Internal
    RUSSIA’S FOREIGN POLICY FOREIGN RUSSIA’S XXXXXXXX Andemus, cont? Giliis. Fertus por aciendam ponclem is at ISPI. omantem atuidic estius, nos modiertimiu consulabus RUSSIA’S FOREIGN POLICY: vivissulin voctum lissede fenducient. Andius isupio uratient. THE INTERNAL- Founded in 1934, ISPI is Actu sis me inatquam te te te, consulvit rei firiam atque a an independent think tank committed to the study of catis. Benterri er prarivitea nit; ipiesse stiliis aucto esceps, INTERNATIONAL LINK international political and Catuit depse huiumum peris, et esupimur, omnerobus economic dynamics. coneque nocuperem moves es vesimus. edited by Aldo Ferrari and Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti It is the only Italian Institute Iter ponsultorem, ursultorei contern ultortum di sid C. Marbi introduction by Paolo Magri – and one of the very few in silictemqui publint, Ti. Teatquit, videst auderfe ndiissendam Europe – to combine research Romnesidem simaximium intimus, ut et; eto te adhui activities with a significant publius conlostam sultusquit vid Cate facteri oriciamdi, commitment to training, events, ompec morterei iam pracion tum mo habem vitus pat veri and global risk analysis for senaributem apecultum forte hicie convo, que tris. Serum companies and institutions. pra intin tant. ISPI favours an interdisciplinary Bonertum inatum et rem sus ilicaedemus vid con tum and policy-oriented approach made possible by a research aur, conenit non se facia movere pareis, vo, vistelis re, crei team of over 50 analysts and terae movenenit L. Um prox noximod neritiam adeffrestod an international network of 70 comnit. Mulvis Ahacciverte confenit vat. Romnihilii issedem universities, think tanks, and acchuiu scenimi liescipio vistum det; hacrurorum, et, research centres.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARD the GREAT OCEAN, OR the NEW GLOBALIZATION of RUSSIA Valdai Discussion Club Analytical Report
    Moscow, JuLY, 2012 valdaiclub.com TOWARD THE GREAT OCEAN, OR THE NEW GLOBALIZATION OF RUSSIA Valdai Discussion Club Analytical Report Toward the Great Ocean, or the New Globalization of Russia Valdai Discussion Club analytical report Moscow, July, 2012 valdaiclub.com Head of the research group and executive editor: Sergei Karaganov, Chairman of the Presidium of the Council for Foreign and Defense Policy and Chairman of the Valdai Discussion Club Authors: Oleg Barabanov, Professor at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations under the Russian Foreign Ministry Timofei Bordachev, Director of Research Programs at the Council for Foreign and Defense Policy Contents 5 Introduction: A New Global Agenda 8 Chapter 1. Asia as a Challenge and an Opportunity 20 Chapter 2. From a European Power to a Globalized Power Research background and acknowledgments This paper is based on the analytical report Asian Vector prepared by the National Research University – Higher School of Economics in 2010; abstracts from Through Harmonious Development to Regional Stability: Russia and China in a New Global Architecture prepared by the Asian Section of the Valdai Discussion Club in 2010; abstracts from To the Great Ocean: Russia and Asia, or Russia in Asia? prepared by the Asian Section of the Valdai Discussion Club in 2011; the reports Russia as a Euro-Pacific Power: New Trends in Asian Regional Architecture and the Role of Russia and Korean Peninsula: Challenges and Opportunities for Russia prepared by the Russian World Foundation; and a number of
    [Show full text]
  • Toward the Great Ocean—2, Or Russia's Breakthrough to Asia
    Moscow, February 2014 valdaiclub.com Toward the Great Ocean—2, or Russia’s Breakthrough to Asia Valdai Discussion Club Report Toward the Great Ocean—2, or Russia’s Breakthrough to Asia Valdai Discussion Club Report Moscow, February 2014 valdaiclub.com Executive Editor and Head Authors of the Authors’ Group Igor Makarov Sergei Karaganov principal author, lecturer at the Department of Dean of the Faculty of World Economy World Economy, National Research University and International Affairs at the National Higher School of Economics; Research University — Higher School of Ph.D. in Economics Economics; Honorary Chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Oleg Barabanov Defense Policy (CFDP); D.Sc. in History Head of the Department of Policy and Functioning of the European Union and the European Council, Moscow State Institute of International Relations; professor at the Project scientific supervisors Department of International Affairs, National Research University — Higher School of Sergei Karaganov Economics; D.Sc. in Political Science Dean of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs at the National Timofei Bordachev Research University — Higher School of Director of the Center for Comprehensive Economics; Honorary Chairman of the European and International Studies, National Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Research University — Higher School of Defense Policy (CFDP); D.Sc. in History Economics; Ph.D. in Political Science Victor Larin Evgeny Kanaev Director of the Institute of History, professor at the Department of International Archaeology and Ethnography of the Affairs, National Research University — Higher Peoples of the Far East, Far Eastern School of Economics; D.Sc. in History Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; D.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, Asia Centrale E Caucaso Alessio Stilo
    Russia, Asia centrale e Caucaso Alessio Stilo Il Valdai Club 2019 e le aspirazioni russe da potenza globale Uno degli eventi-chiave per comprendere i lineamenti della politica estera russa del nuovo millennio è il Valdai Discussion Club, un forum di discussione annuale fondato nel 2004 che è stato descritto come “l’equivalente russo del Forum di Davos”1 (ma anche “il Bilderberg di Vladimir Putin”2) e la cui sessione del 2019 ha avuto luogo a Sochi dal 30 settembre al 3 ottobre scorso. Nel 2011 è stata creata la Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club, entità sotto la supervisione congiunta del Council on Foreign and Defence Policy (CFDP), del Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), del Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO University) e della National Research University Higher School of Economics al fine di espandere le attività del Forum in nuove aree, tra cui ricerca e lavoro di sensibilizzazione, programmi regionali e tematici. Nel 2014, la Valdai Foundation ha assunto in toto la gestione di tutti i progetti del Valdai Club, trasformandolo in un vero e proprio think tank strutturato, al punto da svolgere sessioni autonome presso il Forum Economico Internazionale di San Pietroburgo e presso il Forum Economico Orientale di Vladivostok, per il quale ha contribuito a predisporre il programma commerciale. In tal modo il Valdai Club, che in origine fungeva da strumento per “raccontare la Russia al mondo”, è diventato una piattaforma stabile orientata a influenzare l’agenda globale e fornire una valutazione qualificata sulle questioni geopolitiche e geoeconomiche, promuovendo “il dialogo tra le élite intellettuali globali3 al fine di trovare soluzioni per superare le crisi del sistema internazionale”4.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Challenge to the Existing Global Order in His Speeches to the Valdai Discussion Club Three Years Running in Fall 2014
    Russia’s Challenge to the Existing Global Order Dr. Roger E. Kanet, Professor of Political Science, University of Miami In his speeches to the Valdai Discussion Club three years running in fall 2014 through 2016 (Valdai 2014, 2015, 2016), President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation reiterated Russia’s refusal to accept as legitimate the post-Cold War international order. In his view that order is simply a set of rules imposed by the West – to its advantage – that the United States and other Western states themselves often do not follow. For Russia, global order should be based on a multipolar system in which a Westphalian sense of absolute sovereignty prevails; the rules for international economic intercourse cannot continue to preference the West and legitimacy must be based on a system that empowers Russia and other emerging state actors. In other words, Russia continues to challenge the West-centric order that emerged after the collapse of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), as its rhetoric and, especially, its actions over the past decade have increasingly made clear (Bodganov 2017). After a short hiatus following the collapse of the USSR, when Russia’s new leadership was apparently committed to joining the West and its institutions, this view of Russia and its place in the world has come to dominate the ruling political elite ever since Vladimir Putin emerged as president at the turn of the century. Russian policy veered away from its short-lived collaborative Western orientation to a unilateralist approach based on the idea that Russia was not fully part of Europe or the West, but rather was a Eurasian state with its own culture and interests.
    [Show full text]