DOCSLIB.ORG

3J-6 ASCOBANS Annual National Reports on the Protection of Small

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3J-6 ASCOBANS Annual National Reports on the Protection of Small Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Working Group on the State of the Environment and Nature STATE & CONSERVATION Conservation 3-2015 Helsinki, Finland, 9-13 November, 2015 Document title ASCOBANS1 Annual National Reports on the protection of small cetaceans and in particular harbor porpoise and HELCOM Recommendation 17/2 Code 3J-6 Category CMNT Agenda Item Agenda Item 3J – Follow-up HELCOM agreements and activities - Recommendations Submission date 4.11.2015 Submitted by Poland Reference STATE & CONSERVATION 2-2015, Paragraph 5J.22 in the outcome Background According to the discussion during the HELCOM State and Conservation 2-2015 meeting, Poland as a lead country on Recommendation 17/2 Protection of Harbour Porpoise in the Baltic Sea Area, informed the meeting that she can report to the next meeting of State and Conservation (3-2015) on the reporting of the Recommendation as previously done, i.e. to ask ASCOBANS to provide information on countries’ activities on harbor porpoise conservation (Paragraph 5J.22 in the outcome). This document contains the Annual National Reports to the ASCOBANS Agreement for year 2014, including information concerning activities aiming at protection of harbor porpoise in particular. Annual National Reports have been received from six Baltic countries which are also members to ASCOBANS (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Sweden) (Annex 1). The document also includes a comparison of the requirements of HELCOM Recommendation 17/2 and the contents of the ASCOBANS National Reports. Action required The Meeting is invited to take note of the information, consider whether the ASCOBANS National Reports fulfil the reporting requirements of the Recommendation 17/2 and agree on how to organize reporting from countries that are not members of the ASCOBANS Agreement. 1 ASCOBANS - Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans in the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas Page 1 of 2 STATE & CONSERVATION 3-2015, 3J-6 Comparison of ASCOBANS National Reports and HELCOM Rec. 17/2 When comparing reporting requirements according to HELCOM Recommendation 17/2 with ASCOBANS Annual National Reporting Format, it should be stated that information required by ASCOBANS is more detailed and requires additional data such as these concerning e.g. Public Awareness and Education. Additionally, countries should report on all cetaceans species present not only on harbor porpoise, however, for the Baltic countries harbor porpoise is the most important species and in most cases the only species which is present in countries’ marine waters. ASCOBANS reporting format has an introductory part which includes all contact details to relevant authorities involved in cetaceans conservation. First chapter Habitat Conservation and Management reports on the actions which are also required in the HELCOM Recommendation 17/2. It includes several subtitles. First one Fisheries interactions – direct interaction with fisheries including information on 1.1 Investigations of methods to reduce by-catch and 1.2 Implementation of methods to reduce by-catch is in line with section a) in Recommendation 17/2 “give highest priority to avoiding by-catches of harbor porpoises (…)”. Next subtitle from ASCOBANS national reporting format such as Reduction of disturbance including information such as 2.1 Anthropogenic noise, 2.3 Major incidents, 2.4 Pollution and Hazardous Substances provide information required in section b) of HELCOM 17/2 Recommendation “take action (…) on threats such as by-catch mortality, underwater noise, pollutant levels, ship strikes (…)”. Next chapter from ASCOBANS national reporting format Marine Protected Areas and subtitle 3.1 Relevant information comply with section c) from HELCOM Recommendation 17/2 “consider the establishment of marine protected areas for harbor porpoises (…)”. Chapter Surveys and Research and subtitle 4.1 Abundance, Distribution, Population Structure from ASCOBANS national reporting format covers first part of section b) from HELCOM Recommendation 17/2 “take action in close-cooperation with ASCOBANS and ICES, for collection and analysis of additional data on population distribution and abundance, stock identities (…)” The ASCOBANS National Reports include necessary information on conservation of harbor porpoise which is required under the Recommendation 17/2, thus they could also fulfill the reporting obligation of the Recommendation. Information from countries which are not members of ASCOBANS Agreement including Russia, Estonia and Latvia will be provided separately (if available). Poland will request these countries via e-mail to provide necessary information. Page 2 of 2 Annex 1 22nd ASCOBANS Advisory Committee Meeting AC22/Inf.15.1.b The Hague, Netherlands, 29 September - 1 October 2015 Dist. 3 August 2015 Agenda Item 15.1 National Reporting Report from Parties Document Inf.15.1.b 2014 Annual National Report: Denmark Action Requested Take note Submitted by Denmark NOTE: DELEGATES ARE KINDLY REMINDED TO BRING THEIR OWN COPIES OF DOCUMENTS TO THE MEETING 2014 ASCOBANS Annual National Reports This questionnaire has been pre-filled with answers given in 2013 National Report - please update! This format for the ASCOBANS Annual National Reports was endorsed by the 6th Meeting of the Parties in 2009. Reports are due to be submitted to the Secretariat by 31 March of each year. Parties are requested to use this report to provide NEW information on measures taken or actions towards meeting the objectives of the Conservation and Management Plan and the Resolutions of the Meeting of the Parties. The 7th Meeting of the Parties in 2012 agreed to move to online reporting with immediate effect. In order to benefit fully from the opportunities for synergies among CMS Family treaties afforded by this tool, Parties decided that a revised national report format be developed by a small working group assisted by the Secretariat for consideration by the Advisory Committee in preparation for the 8th Meeting of the Parties. While retaining the questions related only to ASCOBANS, it should align more closely to the format used in CMS, AEWA and EUROBATS. General Information Name of Party › Denmark Report prepared by This should indicate the name and affiliation of the lead person for filling in the report. Name Jakob Højer Kristensen Function Biologist Organization Fjord&Bælt Address Margrethes Plads 1 Telephone/Fax +4542131554 Email [email protected] Coordinating Authority and National Coordinator Please confirm the Coordinating Authority responsible for the national implementation of the Agreement, and give the name and contact details of the officially appointed National Coordinator (Focal Point). › The Coordinating Authority, is the Danishy Nature Agency, which is part of the Danish Ministry of Environment. The National Coordinator is: Maj Friis Munk, Biologist, Section of Biodiversity and Species. Phone +45 72542428, email: [email protected] List of National Institutions List of national authorities, organizations, research centres and rescue centres active in the field of study and conservation of cetaceans, including contact details › DTU AQUA, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Section for Ecosystem Based Marine Management, Technical University of Denmark, Charlottenlund Slot, Jægersborg Allé 1, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark. Contact person: Finn Larsen, phone +4535883496, email: [email protected] › The Fisheries and Maritime Museum, Tarphagevej 2, 6710 Esbjerg V, Denmark. Contact person: Lasse Fast Jensen, phone +4576122000, email: [email protected] › Fjord&Bælt, Margrethes Plads 1, 5300 Kerteminde, Denmark. Contact person: Jakob Højer Kristensen, phone +45 42131550, email: [email protected] › Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. Contact person: Jonas Teilmann +45 87158494, email: [email protected] › Marine Biological Research Center, University of Southern Denmark, Hindsholmvej 11, 5300 Kerteminde, 2014 ASCOBANS Annual National Reports [ASCOBANS Party: Denmark] Page 1 of 10 Denmark. Contact person: Magnus Wahlberg, phone +45 22163950, email: [email protected] › The National Veterinary Institute, DTU-VET, Bülowsvej 27, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. Contact person: Mette Sif Hansen, phone +45 35886719, email: [email protected] 2014 ASCOBANS Annual National Reports [ASCOBANS Party: Denmark] Page 2 of 10 Habitat Conservation and Management Fisheries Interactions Direct Interaction with Fisheries 1.1 Investigations of methods to reduce bycatch › Nabe-Nielsen, J., Sibly, R. M., Tougaard, J., Teilmann, J., & Sveegaard, S. (2014). Effects of noise and by- catch on a Danish harbour porpoise population. Ecological Modelling, 272, 242–251. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.025 1.4 Report under EC Regulation 812/2004 Please provide the link to your country's report under EC Regulation 812/2004. › http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0578:FIN:EN:HTML Reduction of Disturbance 2.1 Anthropogenic Noise Please reference and briefly summarise any studies undertaken › Hermannsen, Line, Kristian Beedholm, Jakob Tougaard, and Peter T. Madsen. “High Frequency Components of Ship Noise in Shallow Water with a Discussion of Implications for Harbor Porpoises (Phocoena Phocoena).” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136, no. 4 (2014): 1640–53. 2.3 Major Incidents Major Incidents Affecting Significant Numbers of Cetaceans (two or more animals) Dat Locatio Type of Further e n Incident Information Incident
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A0 Vertical Poster
    Hydrochemical characterization of SGD in the Bay of Puck, Southern Baltic Sea Żaneta Kłostowska1,2*, Beata Szymczycha1, Karol Kuliński1, Monika Lengier1 and Leszek Łęczyński2 1 Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, 81-712 Sopot, Poland 2 Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, Marszałka Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378 Gdynia, Poland * [email protected] Introduction Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is defined as all flow of water from seabed to the water column and is a significant path of both water masses and chemical substances exchange between land and ocean (Burnett et al. 2003). SGD in the Bay of Puck has been recognized as an important source of selected chemical substances in comparison to rivers, atmospheric deposition and point sources (Szymczycha and Pempkowiak 2016). The assumption was made that SGD off Hel is representative for the whole area. As inner and outer part of the Bay of Puck characterizes with different oceanographic conditions there is a need to verify whether SGD composition is similar at both parts. The aim of this study was to identify difference in SGD composition at several sites located in the Inner and Outer part of the Bay of Puck including sites located in Hel Peninsula and mainland. Methods The research was carried out within 2016 and 2017. Three active groundwater discharge areas were identified in Hel Peninsula (Hel, Jurata, Chałupy), and three at inland part of the bay (Puck, Swarzewo and Osłonino) based on in situ salinity measurements (Fig.1.). Samples with Cl- concentration smaller than 1000 mg·dm-3 represented SGD, while samples with Cl- concentration higher than 1000 mg·dm-3 were recognised as seepage water.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Yearbook of International Law Vol. XVIII/1989-1990
    POLISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW XVIII ACADEMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES INSTITUT DES SCIENCES JURIDIQUES ANNUAIRE POLONAIS DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL XVIII 1989— 1990 OSSOLINEUM MAISON D’EDITION DE L’ACADEMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES Dr. Władysław Czapliński ul. Widawska 7/36 01-494 Warszawa POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF LAW STUDIES POLISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW XVIII 1989— 1990 WROCŁAW-WARSZAWA-KRAKÓW ZAKŁAD NARODOWY IMIENIA OSSOLIŃSKICH WYDAWNICTWO POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK 1992 EDITORIAL COMMITTEE * COMITE DE REDACTION Lech Antonowicz, Remigiusz Bierzanek, Wojciech Góralczyk, Roman Jasica, Jerzy Kranz, Manfred Lachs, Jerzy Makarczyk, Janusz Mic- kiewicz, Stanisław E. Nahlik, Jerzy Rajski, Krzysztof Skubiszewski, Janusz Symonides, Andrzej Wasilkowski, Karol Wolike EDITORIAL BOARD • REDACTION Andrzej Wasilkowski (Editor-in-Chief) Jerzy Rajski (Deputy Editor-in-Chief) Renata Szafarz (Deputy Editor-in-Chief) Address of the Editorial Board • Adresse de la Rédaction Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 00-330 Warszawa The typescript of the current issue was handed to the Publisher in December 1989. Contents * Table des matières Articles WŁADYSŁAW CZAPLIŃSKI, The Polish-East German Dispute on the Delimitation of Maritime Areas in the Bay of Pomerania an Appraisal 7 GENOWEFA M. GRABOWSKA, Les avis consultatifs— de la Cour Internationale de Justice 17 RUDOLF OSTRIHANSKY, The “ Mazilu Opinion” of the International Court of Justice and Its Contribution to Clarification of International Law 31 ANNA PRZYBOROWSKA-KLIMCZAK,
    [Show full text]
  • In Pomerania Bay, Gdansk Bay and Curonian Lagoon
    Journal of Elementology ISSN 1644-2296 Pilarczyk B., Pilecka-Rapacz M., Tomza-Marciniak A., Domagała J., Bąkowska M., Pilarczyk R. 2015. Selenium content in European smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus L.) in Pomerania Bay, Gdansk Bay and Curonian Lagoon. J. Elem., 20(4): 957-964. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2015.20.1.876 SELENIUM CONTENT IN EUROPEAN SMELT (OSMERUS EPERLANUS EPERLANUS L.) IN POMERANIA BAY, GDANSK BAY AND CURONIAN LAGOON Bogumiła Pilarczyk1, Małgorzata Pilecka-Rapacz2, Agnieszka Tomza-Marciniak1, Józef Domagała2, Małgorzata Bąkowska1, Renata Pilarczyk3 1Chair of Animal Reproduction Biotechnology and Environmental Hygiene West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin 2 Chair of General Zoology University of Szczecin 3Laboratory of Biostatistics West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin Abstract Migratory smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus L.) may be perceived as a valuable indicative organism in monitoring the current environmental status and in assessment of a potential risk caused by selenium pollution. The aim of the study was to compare the selenium content in the European smelt from the Bay of Pomerania, Gdansk, and the Curonian Lagoon. The experimen- tal material consisted of smelt samples (muscle) caught in the bays of Gdansk and Pomerania and the Curonian Lagoon (estuaries of the three largest rivers in the Baltic Sea basin: the Oder, the Vistula and the Neman). A total of 133 smelt were examined (Pomerania Bay n = 67; Gdansk Bay n = 35; Curonian Lagoon n = 31). Selenium concentrations were determined spec- trofluorometrically. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance, calculated in Statistica PL software. The region of fish collection significantly affected the content of selenium in the examined smelts.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreading of Brine in the Puck Bay in View of In-Situ Measurements
    E3S Web of Conferences 54, 00029 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185400029 SWIM 2018 Spreading of brine in the Puck Bay in view of in-situ measurements Małgorzata Robakiewicz Department of Coastal Engineering and Dynamics, Institute of Hydro-Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdańsk, Poland. ABSTRACT Since autumn of 2010 in the north-eastern part of Poland underground gas stores are under construction by diluting salt deposits. A by-product of the technology applied is brine, which is discharged into the coastal waters of the Puck Bay (south Baltic Sea). In the pre- investment study a theoretical analysis of the mixing conditions in the near-field and far- field of the proposed installation was conducted. An extensive monitoring programme carried out since 2010 shows a good mixing of brine with the surrounding waters. Excess salinity due to the continuous discharge of brine estimated using data measured in situ is generally lower than permitted, i.e. not exceeding 0.5 psu in the near-field of installation. INTRODUCTION Increasing demands for gas storage capacity encouraged Polish Gas and Oil Company (PGNiG) to make use of salt deposits located in the north-eastern part of Poland, in the area bordering on the Puck Bay (the inner part of the Gulf of Gdańsk, South Baltic Sea), to create underground gas stores. A complex of 10 chambers (total volume of 250x106 m3) was designed for construction in Kosakowo, near Gdynia. Owing to local geological conditions, the chambers are created at a depth of 800-1600 m. The construction site (GSS, Figure 1) is located about 4 km away from the Baltic Sea coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Sea Levels at Selected Stations on the Baltic Sea Coast*
    doi:10.5697/oc.56-2.259 Extreme sea levels at OCEANOLOGIA, 56 (2), 2014. selected stations on the pp. 259–290. C Copyright by Baltic Sea coast* Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, 2014. KEYWORDS Baltic Sea Extreme sea levels Storm surges and falls Tomasz Wolski1,⋆, Bernard Wiśniewski2 Andrzej Giza1, Halina Kowalewska-Kalkowska1 Hanna Boman3, Silve Grabbi-Kaiv4 Thomas Hammarklint5, Jurgen¨ Holfort6 Zydruneˇ Lydeikaite˙ 7 1 University of Szczecin, Faculty of Geosciences, al. Wojska Polskiego 107/109, 70–483 Szczecin, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] ⋆corresponding author 2 Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Navigation, Wały Chrobrego 1–2, 70–500 Szczecin, Poland 3 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palm´enin aukio 1, FI–00101 Helsinki, Finland 4 Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Toompuiestee 24, 10149 Tallinn, Estonia 5 Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Sven K¨allfelts Gata 15, 42471 G¨oteborg, Sweden 6 Bundesamt f¨ur Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie, Neptunallee 5, 18057 Rostock, Germany 7 Environmental Protection Agency, Taikos pr. 26, LT–91149, Klaipeda, Lithuania Received 25 October 2013, revised 6 February 2014, accepted 11 February 2014. * This work was financed by the Polish National Centre for Science research project No. 2011/01/B/ST10/06470. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 260 T. Wolski, B. Wiśniewski, A. Giza et al. Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyse and describe the extreme characteristics of the water levels and illustrate them as the topography of the sea surface along the whole Baltic Sea coast. The general pattern is to show the maxima and minima of Baltic Sea water levels and the extent of their variations in the period from 1960 to 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • National Studies of the Law Applicable on the Continental Shelf and in the EEZ
    National Studies of the Law Applicable on the Continental Shelf and in the EEZ The Law Applicable on the Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone: The Polish Perspective Maria Dragun-Gertner and Zuzanna Peplowska Faculty of Law and Administration, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland Dorota Pyć Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Gdańsk, Poland GENERAL/DESCRIPTIVE 1. Is your country a party to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea? Poland is a party to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The Polish Parliament agreed to the ratifi cation of the Convention and Agreement on Part XI on 2 July 1998.1 Consequently, the Convention and Agreement on Part XI was ratifi ed by the President and came into force in Poland on 13 December 1998.2 2. Is or was your country party to the 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf ? 3. Did your country adopt legislation to implement the 1958 Convention (if a party)? Was this legislation amended after 1982? Poland is also a party to the 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf, which was ratifi ed on 22 May 1962.3 On 17 December 1977, the Parliament of the Polish People’s Republic adopted the Act on the Continental Shelf of the Polish People’s Republic, which came into force on 1 January 1978.4 The Polish continental shelf 1. Statute with the agreement for the ratifi cation found in the Offi cial Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland - Dz. U. 1998, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrophyta As a Vector of Contemporary and Historical Mercury from the Marine Environment to the Trophic Web
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Environ Sci Pollut Res (2015) 22:5228–5240 DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-4003-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Macrophyta as a vector of contemporary and historical mercury from the marine environment to the trophic web Magdalena Bełdowska & Agnieszka Jędruch & Joanna Słupkowska & Dominka Saniewska & Michał Saniewski Received: 12 May 2014 /Accepted: 15 December 2014 /Published online: 8 January 2015 # The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Macrophyta are the initial link introducing toxic Introduction mercury to the trophic chain. Research was carried out at 24 stations located within the Polish coastal zone of the Southern Mercury is considered to be one of the most dangerous con- Baltic, in the years 2006–2012. Fifteen taxa were collected, taminants of the environment. The adverse effect of Hg is belonging to four phyla: green algae (Chlorophyta), brown related to its strong chemical and biological activity, as a result algae (Phaeophyta), red algae (Rhodophyta) and flowering of which it is easily absorbed by organisms and spreads in the vascular plants (Angiospermophyta), and total mercury con- environment very rapidly. Mercury compounds become accu- centrations were ascertained. The urbanisation of the coastal mulated in tissues and can undergo biomagnification in or- zone has influenced the rise in Hg concentrations in ganisms on higher trophic levels, reaching concentrations macroalgae, and the inflow of contaminants from the river many times higher than in the environment itself (Förstner drainage area has contributed to an increase in metal concen- and Wittman 1981;Jackson1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Skania Zamkami Stoi Scania – a Land of Castles
    Skania zamkami stoi Scania – a land of castles Aktywnie… na krawędzi kontynentu Actively… at the edge of the continent Nakład: 7 000 Nakład: egz. | ISSN 1426-2959 Szczecin pachnie czekoladą Szczecin smells of chocolate Nr 2021 1 (84) od redakcji \ from the editor Szanowni Państwo, w numerze Spis treści Wszyscy pragniemy, aby ten rok bardziej features Contents sprzyjał wyjazdom i dawał możliwość re- alizacji podróżniczych marzeń. My jeste- śmy w pełnej gotowości, aby je spełniać. 4 Unity Line wypływa na wirtualne wody innowacji Już teraz, zapraszamy na stronę Unity Unity Line sets sail into the Line w odświeżonym wydaniu oraz no- virtual waters of innovation wego sklepu internetowego z wycieczkami do Skandynawii, gdzie w szybki sposób 5 Cała Skandynawia w jednym wyszukamy idealną dla siebie propozycję miejscu podróży. All Scandinavia in one place W najnowszym numerze Baltic Panora- 6 Skania zamkami stoi my niezmiennie zachęcamy Państwa do Scania – a land of castles odkrywania najrozmaitszych zakątków 12 Aktywnie… na krawędzi Skandynawii. Przeniesiemy się do nasze- kontynentu go ulubionego regionu, czyli Skanii, gdzie zdecydowanie warto postawić Actively… at the edge of the na aktywną turystykę, połączoną z elementami edukacji ekologicznej. To idealny kierunek dla osób preferujących turystykę pieszą i rowerową. continent Udamy się również w podróż szlakiem imponujących szwedzkich zam- 16 Jednodniówka w Ystad ków oraz latarni morskich. Day trip to Ystad Zawitamy także do Szczecina, gdzie skosztujemy lokalne, słodkie przy- 18 Szczecińska Wenecja smaki, podpowiemy jak i gdzie miło spędzić wolny czas, a także dlaczego i świnoujski slalom pomiędzy warto wspierać lokalnych rzemieślników. wyspami „Kanapowców” z pewnością zachęcą do ruchu artykuły o zumbie – jednej The Szczecin Venice and the 6 z najczęściej uprawianych form fitness na świecie oraz o aktywnościach, Świnoujście slalom between które warto wpleść do codziennego poruszania się z miejsca A do B.
    [Show full text]
  • Nord Stream 2 Monitoring Strategy Germany
    Nord Stream 2 Monitoring Strategy Germany Nord Stream 2 AG | May-18 W-PE-EMO-PGE-SOW-800-MONITOEN-01 Page 2 of 48 Content 1 Monitoring Strategy Germany ..................................................................................... 3 2 Environmental Construction Supervision onshore (2018-2020) ............................... 3 2.1 S1, S2 – Protection of soil and groundwater ........................................................... 9 2.2 S3, S4, M13 – Construction fence, amphibian strand guide .................................. 10 2.3 M9, M11, M12 – Construction period limitations, reduction of noise and light immissions to protect breeding birds and bats ................................................................. 11 2.4 M10, CEF1 & 2 – Bat sites and nesting boxes for starlings ................................... 12 3 Environmental Construction Supervision offshore, territorial waters M-WP (2018/2019) ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 M 1/M 2/M 3 Dredging strategy ............................................................................. 15 3.2 M 4/M 5 Turbidity monitoring ................................................................................. 16 3.3 Traffic monitoring .................................................................................................. 20 4 Environmental Construction Supervision offshore, continental shelf (2018/2019) 21 5 Construction monitoring ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Development Plan
    Destination Development Plan Puck Bay and Gdańsk Bay Poland Gdańsk, December 2019 The report done within the framework of the European project entitled: Development, promotion and sustainable management of the Baltic Sea Region as a coastal fishing tourism destination, o nr #R065, implemented in the Baltic Sea Region Programme co-financed from the European Regional Development Fund 2 LIST OF CONTENT list of content ............................................................................................................................. 3 list of figures ............................................................................................................................... 4 list of tables ................................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7 2. Basic information on the plan ........................................................................................... 10 2.1. Primary aim ................................................................................................................ 11 2.2. Methodology ............................................................................................................. 13 2.3. Document structure .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tourist Attractions of the Northern Kashubia Tourist
    55 54 49 Jastrzębia TOURIST ATTRACTIONS OF THE 60 Góra 59 14 58 48 Karwia 215 Dębki 50 15 MorzeNORTHERN Bałtyckie KASHUBIA 51 47 Białogóra 56 52 61 62 13 16 12 Piaśnica 46 45 63 57 Krokowa 44 70 Władysławowo Żarnowiec 215 Mieroszyno J. Żarnowieckie 18 17 Prusewo 73 Starzyński 216 Chałupy Dwór Swarzewo 11 64 Kłanino 65 43 72 Starzyno 19 67 39 42 Bychowo Nadole 7 J. Choczewskie 40 41 20 10 6 66 68 Gniewino Puck 21 Kuźnica 8 Zbiornik j. Dobre Mechowo Jastarnia 53 Elektrowni 22 38 9 Lisewski 213 23 Jurata Dwór 74 J. Salino 37 Rzucewo Piaśnica Zatoka Pucka Wielka Sławutowo 24 71 Osłonino J. Czarne 36 218 26 75 j. Dąbrze Kniewo Sławutówko 27 1 J. Orle 216 25 34 Rekowo Reda Górne 5 35 Rewa 33 4 Biking Trails 28 Mechelinki Hiking Tours 32 3 100 29 Rail Network Reda 2 National and Wejherowo 69 voivodeship roads 30 Kosakowo Hel 31 218 Rumia 1. The Lighthouse in Hel 16. The Fisherman House in Władysławowo 31. Wejherowo Calvary – 25 chapels 46. The bike route: Swarzewo – Krokowa 62. Royal Fern Nature Reserve 2. The Seal Aquarium in Hel 17. The Avenue of Sports Stars in Władysławowo 32. Nordic Walking Park Wejherowo 47. The bike route: Mechowo – Jastrzębia Góra 63. „Sześć Dębów” Manor in Prusewo (Six Oaks Manor) 3. The fishing and yacht harbour in Hel 18. Sanctuary of Saint Mary of Swarzewo 33. Park and Palace Complex in Wejherowo 48. The cliff in Jastrzębia Góra 64. The Manor in Bychowo 4. The Museum of Fishery in Hel 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]